Scrapbookpages Blog

February 6, 2011

Web site that challenges Holocaust denial

Filed under: Holocaust, World War II — Tags: , , — furtherglory @ 8:32 am

Back in April 2010, I read about a new web site that was soon to be launched by British historian Laurence Rees.  The web site that made the announcement put the photo shown below at the top of the home page.

On the web site that made the announcement, the caption under the photo reads: “Prisoners at the Sachsenhausen concentration camp: damning evidence to rebuff attacks on the Holocaust”

Prisoners at Sachsenhausen concentration camp

Exactly what is the “damning evidence” in this photo that rebuffs Holocaust deniers?  Is it the earmuffs that two of the prisoners are wearing?  Young people today probably don’t know what earmuffs are; they might think that the prisoners are listening to music.  In my opinion, this photo scores one for the deniers, but what do I know?

Sachsenhausen was not a “death camp” for Jews and the men in the photo do not appear to be Jewish.  Sachsenhausen was a concentration camp mainly for political prisoners.

I decided to take a  look at the new web site, that was advertised as a website to combat Holocaust denial, which is at http://www.WW2history.com.  I found that the web site is really about the history of World War 2 and that it is aimed at teachers.  To use the web site, one must first sign up and pay a fee.  So the purpose of the web site seems to be to make money, not to combat Holocaust denial. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

I clicked on the teacher’s option for a free look at Laurence Rees’ lesson plans here.  I found that the lesson plan for the segment on the Hungarian Jews directed teachers to “Explain (to the students) that the lesson will explore these issues and the fate of Hungarian Jewry through the testimony of Alice Lok Cahana.”

That name was very familiar to me.  Alice Lok Cahana is one of the Hungarian Jews who survived the Holocaust. Her story was told by Laurence Rees in his book entitled Auschwitz, a New History which I read in preparation for my second trip to Auschwitz in 2005. Alice was also featured in Steven Spielberg’s documentary The Last Days.

Alice Lok was 15 years old when she arrived at Auschwitz in 1944; she passed the selection for the gas chamber and was registered in the Auschwitz II (Birkenau) camp. Alice barely survived because children under 15 were sent immediately to the gas chamber and were dead within an hour or two.

According to her story, as told to Laurence Rees, Alice Lok was selected months later to be gassed in crematorium #5, also known as Krema V. This was one of the two gas chambers at Birkenau that were disguised as shower rooms; the other gas chamber disguised as a shower room was in crematorium #4.  Alice was told that she would be given new clothes after taking a shower. (This was the way that the SS men lured innocent young girls into the gas chamber. What teen-aged girl would not want new clothes?) Alice told Laurence Rees that the purpose of the red brick Krema V building was deceptively disguised by red geraniums in window boxes.  (Another way to lure young girls to their death.)

Old photo of crematorium #5 was taken before the window boxes were put up

By a remarkable coincidence, Alice was inside the gas chamber in Krema V at the exact time that the revolt by the Sonderkommando unit in Krema IV began on October 7, 1944. This was the occasion when the Sonderkommando prisoners blew up the Krema IV gas chamber building with dynamite that had been sneaked into Birkenau by some of the women prisoners who worked in factories outside the camp.

Laurence Rees wrote this in his book Auschwitz, a New History:

“But the revolt did save some lives. It must have been because of the chaos caused by the Sonderkommando in crematorium 4 that the SS guards emptied the gas chamber of crematorium 5 next door without killing Alice Lok Cahana and her group.”

Forget “combating Holocaust denial”; the story of Alice’s escape from the gas chamber would be a good way to explain the term “Deux ex machina” to students in fiction writing classes.   According to Wikipedia, “Deux ex machina”  is the name of a plot device used by writers  when “a seemingly inextricable problem is suddenly and abruptly solved with the contrived and unexpected intervention of some new character, ability or object.”

When I was studying fiction writing in college, this plot device was laughed at and frowned upon.  If Laurence Rees seriously wants to combat Holocaust denial, he should avoid including stories like this in his lesson plans for school kids.

Another reason that Alice Lok Cahana is not a suitable person to give testimony to school kids, who are studying the Holocaust, is the fact that, instead of being gassed at Auschwitz-Birkenau, she was transferred to Bergen-Belsen, just like Anne Frank. This fact tends to disprove the claim that Auschwitz-Birkenau was a “death camp.”

Alice was one of the Hungarian Holocaust survivors featured in Steven Spielberg’s documentary, The Last Days.  In the documentary there is a scene where Alice goes to the Memorial Site at the location of the Bergen-Belsen camp in order to find out what happened to her sister, who was also an inmate there.  Alice is filmed as she  is shown the detailed camp records kept by the Germans at Bergen-Belsen. She learns that her sister was using the name Edith Schwartz when she was at Bergen-Belsen and that she died on June 2, 1945.  The Bergen-Belsen camp was turned over to the British on April 15, 1945 so this means that Edith died while in the care of the British.

According to British historian Martin Gilbert, there were 27,000 Jews who died after the British took over the camp.

A photo of Alice, taken in Bergen-Belsen in 1945, is shown in the documentary The Last Days.  Strangely, Alice does not look emaciated and she has a full head of shoulder-length hair.  She appears to be in remarkable condition, considering that she was in the Auschwitz-Birkenau “death camp,” and then at Bergen-Belsen where the British claimed that the prisoners were starved to death.  So how does the story of Alice Lok Cahana combat Holocaust denial?

4 Comments

  1. Why weren’t the British put on trial for killing those 27000 people. They were in charge of the camp at the time they should have been charged with their deaths. Some people even here think that just because the Germans ran camps and they had issues with typhus and disease that they should be blamed for the typhus disease because they were in control of
    the camps. Fine if you want to use that type of reasoning then why not have the British be put on trial for war crimes for allowing these 27 thousand people that died in bergen-belsen. I guess only Germans can be tried for war crimes everybody else gets away with it

    JR

    Comment by jrizoli — May 30, 2016 @ 2:08 pm

  2. Rees should be laughed out of a career.

    When we look at the top exterminationist “historians”, we are really left with lightweights.

    Rees, Berenbaum, Waltzer ? Is that the best they have?

    The only reason Rees was mentioned twice in my documentary was because this dumbass decided to use absolutely preposterous Grimm fairy tales from “survivors.”

    1) Lok-Cahana’s gas chamber escape
    2) The “Sonderkomando Family’s” ever-changing “three people, one bullet” story

    The pathetic thing is Rees tries to run cover for their fictional fantasies by writing other sentences or even paragraphs trying to prove they gel with truth.

    Your point about “Deux ex machina” is brilliant, and I think really gets to the root of why I got involved in this whole denial thing. I saw “Deux ex machina” and other manipulative devices used by “survivors” in so-called non-fiction testimonies that I would have found laughable in a fictional book or movie.

    “Deux ex machina”, “god out of the machine” ,

    Maybe – “God out of the Gas Chamber” or “God out of Molech” ?

    To be fair, the photo you describe of Lok-Cahana in good shape at Bergen-Belsen appears to show her piling food into her mouth in front of a few corpses…I think it’s only in close-up in the film, I’ve seen the full version in the book. Now I wonder if the full version is a forgery?

    Also, your point about Cahana’s sister dying over a month after the camp was liberated is very good. I mentioned it in an earlier draft and should probably reinstate that point in the second draft.

    The way Spielberg and company “sell” the scene of her family at Bergen Belsen…has to be seen to be believed.

    Her sister died of typhus, over a month after liberation. The British couldn’t save her. And I think the Anne Frank parallel is important as well.

    If anyone knows of any footage of Lok-Cahana telling her gas chamber escape lie, I’d love to put it in my documentary.

    Comment by Eric Hunt — February 13, 2011 @ 12:36 am

  3. I’ve made about the same experience.
    I found so many discrepancies that I sent the site a mail – this one:

    Mr Laurence Rees!

    In pdf “Information_Cards_for_Auschwitz_1941” you state this:
    “Everyone was moaning and yelling because of the cold – it was an incredible sound, I never heard it before. Naked they enter the gassing chamber. It was a devilish, hellish image.”
    – Jerzy Bielecki
    Auschwitz prisoner, AUSCHWITZ 1941

    Every concrete/cement construction is in it self always very cold — it is a physical fact.
    Another physical fact is that Zyklon-B pellets does not start to release its cyanide content until the temperature goes above 26 Celcius/79 Farenheit. Below 26 the pellets are harmless as sugar.

    So that “eye witness” Jerzy Bielecki can only have seen this in his dreams, because when it is so cold that people are moaning and yelling, there is no way that the pellets can release cyanide gas. No way!!
    And that is an undisputable Nobel Prize fact. And it is also a FACT that there where no heating facilities what so ever in any of these buildings.
    And there is no known way of fooling the Laws of Nature, is there!??

    Don’t you find that some what disturbing, Mr Laurence Rees?

    Comment by Königsberg — February 7, 2011 @ 1:41 am

    • Jerzy Bielecki was on the first transport of political prisoners that were brought from Tarnow to the Auschwitz main camp in June 1940. He was a prisoner for over four years before he escaped in July 1944, along with a Jewish woman who was also a prisoner. He is still alive and in his 80s now. As a political prisoner, who had been captured and imprisoned during a war, he would have had a motive to lie to make the enemy look as evil as possible. I don’t think the Germans would have allowed a Polish political prisoner to be a witness to the gassing of prisoners.

      In his testimony, Jerzy claimed that he witnessed this in 1941, so he was talking about the gas chamber in the main camp. This gas chamber did not have an undressing room. The previous director of the Auschwitz Museum admitted that the gas chamber in the main camp did not have any way to heat the pellets. Lawerence Rees should not have used this testimony on his web site that supposedly “challenges Holocaust denial.”

      Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2011 @ 6:33 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: