Scrapbookpages Blog

May 11, 2012

The day that the crematoria at Auschwitz-Birkenau were destroyed — according to Elie Wiesel’s book “Night.”

Filed under: Holocaust — Tags: , , — furtherglory @ 9:29 am

Carolyn Yeager posted a new article on her blog Elie Wiesel Cons the World yesterday.  The title of the article is Elie Wiesel Knows Soviet “Liberators” Destroyed the Birkenau Crematoriums.  You can read the article in full here.

This quote is from Ms. Yeager’s blog:

The official Holocaust narrative has it that the Red Army did not arrive at the Auschwitz labor camps until January 27th, 1945—where they found some of the barracks burning, and also blown-up crematorium buildings which had housed “gas chambers.” This is the date that is commemorated all over the world as the Liberation of Auschwitz.

However, on page 87 of the novel Night it is stated that the Russians “liberated” the inmates who were left behind at Monowitz (Auschwitz III) on January 20th, two days after the bulk of the prisoners left on the one-day forced march to Gleiwitz, from where they were put on a train to Buchenwald.

I have always suspected that the Germans did not come back and blow up Krema II and Krema III two days after they left the camp on January 18, 1945.  Now we have the proof, from Elie Wiesel’s book which is required reading for every school child in America.  I read the book years ago, but I missed the significance of the statement that the Soviets arrived two days after the Germans left.

Photo of the ruins of Krema II taken by the Soviet liberators of Birkenau, Feb. 1945

My photo of the ruins of Krema II, taken in October 2005

The official story of the Holocaust is that the Germans blew up the crematoria (the buildings which housed the gas chambers) in order to destroy the evidence of the gassing of prisoners at Auschwitz-Birkenau.  But we are asked to believe that they fooled around for months, while the Soviets were advancing across Poland, and did not destroy the evidence of gassing before they abandoned the camp.  The official story is that the Germans not only came back twice to blow up the gas chambers, but they filled in the holes in the roof so that, if the gas chambers were not completely destroyed, there would be no evidence of the holes through which the Zyklon-B was allegedly poured.

My photo of the ruins of Krema II at Birkenau, Oct. 2005

In the photo above, the collapsed roof of the underground gas chamber in Krema II can be seen in the foreground. The ruins of the undressing room, which is at right angles to the gas chamber, can be seen on the left. The International Monument, built in 1965, is in the background.  The ruins of Krema III are on the other side of the International Monument.  The International Monument was built on the road that leads to the Sauna where the incoming prisoners took a shower.  The Holocaust survivors, who are alive today and giving their testimony, saw the prisoners headed towards this road, where they turned and went to the shower room in the Sauna building where the clothing was disinfected.

The road to the Sauna building starts where the International Monument is now located


1 Comment

  1. Story about destroying evidence by Germans is very stupid when we can see that explosion didn´t destroy alleged gas chamber, the roof was only lifted up by explosion and then fell down on the supporting pillars so the roof is almost complete and this can be hardly considered as destroying evidence and this would be hardly sufficient for some criminal who wants to cover crime. They also left intact almost complete documentation of central construction office instead of simply burning it in a few seconds or minutes, instead of this they decided to left it for us as a “proof” of holocaust together with thousands of witnesses.

    “but they filled in the holes in the roof so that, if the gas chambers were not completely destroyed, there would be no evidence of the holes through which the Zyklon-B was allegedly poured.”

    As mentioned earlier, this is impossible, is not possible to fill in hole in the concrete without leaving a trace, this claim from orthodox officials is just absurd. When they decided to use new strategy when they started to say that holes can be seen today, they contradicted their own previous claim about filling the holes, because if the holes were allegedly filled in before explosion to be sure that they will be obliterated in the case of failed destruction, how is possible that they are there as they now claims? They obviously did not fill them in, that is the answer. But if the purpose was to destroy the chamber and the damning holes as official holocaustians claim, why they did not destroy them and after explosion they simply did not care that holes are still visible even after explosion so the main task of obliterating criminal evidence was not achieved?

    Answer is again simple, hole 1(2) was made after the war to get an access to alleged chamber by Poles or Soviets for the purpose of investigation:

    Hole 7, the second visible hole in the roof is accepted by both sides as made after the war and nobody claims that served for Zyklon B, so the only question is who did this hole, when, and why somebody systematically altered this hole during the years to make it look more square and who removed rebars? Obviously somebody who wanted to pass this hole as a hole for Zyklon B. But who needs to do this if the roof already shows genuine Zyklon B holes? Of course nobody, this is needed only when there are no Zyklon B holes.

    Missing holes in krematorium II and III respectively and holes in krematorium I are the most simple and most strongest revisionist arguments which proves whole gassing story and Auschwitz as a lie and alleged witnesses as liars.

    The first mystery for me is why the whole story still did not collapse thanks to these irrefutable proofs when everybody can see the roofs in KI and KII with their own eyes? The peoples do not believe own eyes but believe peoples like Pelt instead of own eyes?

    The second mystery is why they decided to stop using “holes were filled in and are not visible today” and chose to use “holes were located and are visible today” when the holes were in the roof for many years and even from the 40´s? What a miracle when they finally noticed three of them in 1998+! But that is not all, they still wants to make us believe that one of the hole (hole 3) is there, but is completely invisible!

    I really like this cartoon

    Comment by Bob — May 12, 2012 @ 4:05 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: