Scrapbookpages Blog

May 28, 2012

Aerial photos of Auschwitz were altered by the CIA to manufacture evidence

Filed under: Holocaust, World War II — Tags: , , — furtherglory @ 1:45 pm

This morning I spent a lot of time reading about the air photos of Auschwitz-Birkenau taken from American reconnaissance planes in 1944 and 1945.  I downloaded the photos from the website of Germar Rudolf here.  In case you don’t know who Germar Rudolf is, he was the first highly qualified Holocaust revisionist, by virtue of his education and intelligence. His books are highly scientific and technical — no hatred nor anti-Semitism involved — just the facts. You can get to know Germar Rudolf on his website here.

The pdf files about the air photos which you can download from Germar Rudolf’s website include photos taken from the Auschwitz Album.  These are photos taken by the Germans during the time that the Hungarian Jews were arriving at Birkenau.  These photos are used by Holocaustians to prove that Jews were gassed, but actually, they prove the opposite.

You can also read about the air photos on this website.  This quote is from the website:

… the photos of Auschwitz (Illustrations 8 and following) were taken by the Americans. It took the Allied landing in Italy in autumn of 1943 before the Americans were able to bomb the industrial area of Upper Silesia; Allied reconnaissance flights over this area therefore did not begin until the winter of 1943/44. However, the corresponding air photos were not submitted to the National Archives by the CIA, and thus made accessible to the public, until the late 1970s. It was also the CIA which published the first photos of Auschwitz-Birkenau in 1979.(16)

The pdf files that you can download from Germar Rudolf’s website explain where and how the photos were altered by the CIA.

The area where the two main crematoria were located has been changed by the building of the International Monument between Krema II and Krema III.  Tourists can no longer see that the main camp road went on into the countryside where there were farms very near the camp.  The International Monument has been built over the intersection of the main road and the road to the Sauna where the Jews took a shower before entering the camp as prisoners.

The aerial photos show that the soccer field was very near one crematorium and that there were 12 kitchens near the crematoria.  The photos show that there was no secrecy surrounding the crematoria; the prisoners could see everything that was going on.  The CIA altered the aerial photos to show high fences around some of the buildings.  The alternations done by the CIA show little chimneys where the Zyklon-B gas could have been poured in, but photos taken by the Germans do not show these openings.

The bottom line is that there is no air photo evidence to support the claim of mass murder at Auschwitz-Birkenau.  You can read it here.


  1. Ball challenged others to dispute him, then refused to communicate with those who wanted to take him up on it.
    Much like the current President, lie big and ignore everybody pointing to reality.

    Comment by Robert — March 19, 2017 @ 1:05 pm

  2. Aerial photographs taken of Auschwitz were initially released by the CIA in 1979 which show spots on top of the roofs of crematoria 2 and 3 that are allegedly Zyklon B introduction ports. Revisionists such as John Ball have argued that these aerial photographs were tampered with and that the spots were drawn in by the CIA. However, “Black Rabbit” and others have pointed out that the aerial photographs of Auschwitz in the hands of the British that were transferred to an archive open to the general public in 2011 (NCAP) show the same features as the aerial photographs in the US Archives, i.e., spots that seem to resemble Zyklon B introduction ports. It has been argued that people like Ball wouldn’t have even known about these photos and that the fact these photographs exist in the British Archives debunks the notion that the CIA tampered with the photos released in 1979. Thoughts? Do you think this is a good argument for the existence of gas chambers at Auschwitz? It is unfortunate for revisionists that these aerial photographs which have been in separate archives seem to corroborate the zigzag pattern of the alleged Zyklon B introduction ports in a sketch made by Sonderkommando inmate David Olère’ that he allegedly sketched during the 40s but that first appeared to the public in 1964 in the French publication Le Droit de Vivre, which predates the CIA releasing the aerial photographs in 1979. To my understanding, there’s also a 1944 Luftwaffe aerial photograph that ostensibly shows the same pattern. Is it even plausible to suggest that all of these photographs are forgeries? Is there some other non-criminal explanation for these markings which coincidentally seem to resemble the sketch made by the inmate David Olère’?

    Comment by Jon — December 10, 2016 @ 1:34 pm

  3. Thanks for doing this very good blog on the air photo evidence, since what is downloadable on Rudolf’s website is the best organized of this material I’ve ever seen. It should be widely circulated as it leaves people like Alfie Goldmeister (not his real name? LOL) with nothing to say. Although Alfie may be a revisionist having fun.

    The best part for me is that the CIA played a major role in perpetrating the HOAX of the HOLOCAUST … which is why so many educated persons call it a HOLOHOAX. That is not an insult because these photos prove it. If the air photos taken by the U.S. Air Force show that what is said was there was NOT there, then nothing else is believable either. A hoax is a hoax is a hoax. We actually need more people saying that.

    Comment by Carolyn Yeager — May 31, 2012 @ 8:40 pm

    • “Although Alfie may be a revisionist having fun.”
      Right you are, I forgot the vast majority of revisionists are idiots. I will also blame my tin-earednes on a chronic lack of sleep recently. The point is if you can say the fences were drawn on – they were – then why can’t you say the underground cellar structures were also drawn on?

      Far more effective in my opinion, but far easy to make up anti-semitic screen names I guess.

      Comment by littlegreyrabbit — June 2, 2012 @ 4:51 am

  4. You sir, are a deplorable cunt.

    Comment by Alfie Goldmeister — May 29, 2012 @ 5:38 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: