Scrapbookpages Blog

January 3, 2013

The Non-Jewish Stake in the Holocaust Mythology — an excellent article by Paul Grubach

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust, World War II — Tags: , , — furtherglory @ 8:22 am

A reader of my blog provided a link to an excellent article, written by Paul Grubach, on the Inconvenient History website which you can read in full here.

Grubach’s article is well-researched and very detailed. He starts off with a long list of Holocaust historians who admit that there is no evidence for much of the “facts” of the Holocaust. He makes many good points about the reasons that Non-Jews hold onto the Holocaust lies, in the face of the complete lack of evidence.

I don’t mind reading a long article because I happen to be a speed reader.  However, to reach a young audience, I feel that he should have started off with the most important part of his article, which is at the very end.

This quote is at the end of the article written by Paul Grubach:

The Future of the Holocaust Mythology: What is to be done?

The traditional Holocaust story plays an enormous political, social and economic role in world affairs. It is as if the whole emotional, intellectual, and institutional set-up of the post World War II world has been built around it. It serves as an ideological “justification” for the sociopolitical arrangements in many parts of the world today. Despite the fact that it is a demonstrably weak and flimsy ideology, it has amazing resiliency. The major reason that the traditional Holocaust story still survives is because there are a wide range of powerful groups that benefit from its perpetuation.

The world sociopolitical status quo that the Holocaust ideology “justifies” and “legitimizes” is threatened with collapse. In this world of endless war and violence, it is the duty of politicians, intellectuals and scholars to attempt to come up with peaceful resolutions to the problems humanity faces. It is now up to the powerful interests that are behind the Holocaust mythology to engage its opponents, the revisionists, in free and democratic debate so we may get at the truth about the fate of the Jews during World War II. In this way, we can help to build a more rational and humane world order, one that is based more upon truth and less upon politically inspired propaganda.

I have nothing to criticize in Paul Grubach’s article.  As far as I can tell, he made no mistakes.  There is just one slight grammatical error: he uses the word “to” when he obviously means “too.”  Too means “too, también, also” as opposed to the preposition “to” as in “to whom are you speaking?”

To get back to Grubach’s article, here are some more of the important points that he makes:

In a word, take away the Holocaust ideology and one important “justification” of the American and British war effort against Germany is consigned to the dustbin of history. Americans and Britons will start asking uncomfortable questions, such as: Why did we go to war with Germany? Maybe we should not have gone to war with Germany, and maybe it was a huge error to be allied with the murderous Stalinist regime? Questions like this clearly pose a threat to the power and influence of the governing elites in American and British society.

One must also not forget that, just as the Soviet Union did, so to did the American and British governments use the Holocaust mythology to hide and obliterate by contrast the awareness of the brutality and mass killing of innocents that they are responsible for. For example, anti-Holocaust revisionist historian Herf admits that the British bombing campaign against Germany resulted in an estimated 500,000 German civilian deaths, disproportionately among women and children.98 Perhaps now we can understand an underlying motive behind Winston Churchill’s statement on the alleged Jewish Holocaust toward the end of the war. He declared: “There is no doubt that this is probably the greatest and most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world, and it has been done by scientific machinery by nominally civilized men in the name of a great state and one of the leading races of Europe.”99

If the alleged mass murder of six million Jews by the Germans is the greatest and most horrible crime ever committed in the whole history of the world, then the mass killing of hundreds of thousands of German women and children by British government bombs pales in comparison, and is obliterated by contrast. The Holocaust ideology performed its services well for Winston Churchill.

[…]

One must view Jewish-Zionism’s success in elevating the Holocaust ideology to the status an unquestionable religious dogma in the surrounding context of non-Jewish interests. During and after WWII, the interests of powerful international Jewish groups dovetailed with the other most powerful groups on this planet—the victorious Allied governments of the Soviet Union, the United States, Great Britain, France and others. Since the most powerful political forces on this planet had a vested interest in promoting the same story, it would be very difficult for anyone to discover that it is false. This is one important reason why the “Holocaust” became an “established fact” throughout much of world.

[…]

The traditional Holocaust story plays an enormous political, social and economic role in world affairs. It is as if the whole emotional, intellectual, and institutional set-up of the post World War II world has been built around it. It serves as an ideological “justification” for the sociopolitical arrangements in many parts of the world today. Despite the fact that it is a demonstrably weak and flimsy ideology, it has amazing resiliency. The major reason that the traditional Holocaust story still survives is because there are a wide range of powerful groups that benefit from its perpetuation.

The world sociopolitical status quo that the Holocaust ideology “justifies” and “legitimizes” is threatened with collapse. In this world of endless war and violence, it is the duty of politicians, intellectuals and scholars to attempt to come up with peaceful resolutions to the problems humanity faces. It is now up to the powerful interests that are behind the Holocaust mythology to engage its opponents, the revisionists, in free and democratic debate so we may get at the truth about the fate of the Jews during World War II. In this way, we can help to build a more rational and humane world order, one that is based more upon truth and less upon politically inspired propaganda.

I urge everyone to read the entire article here.

13 Comments

  1. With some minor exceptions, Holodomor and other Soviet mass atrocities were virtually ignored in the US-and Britain-of the 1930s:

    http://mises.org/books/backdoor.pdf
    (…)
    Bullitt had been more cautious but at times he gave similar assurances. In a conversation with Count Potocki, Polish Ambassador at Washington, he spoke of the possibility of a conflict between Germany and the European democracies. When asked if the United States would enter such a war he replied: “Undoubtedly yes, but only after Great Britain and France had made the first move.” Sentiment in the United States was “so tense
    against Nazism and Hitlerism” that it amounted to a “psychosis” similar to that which existed “before America’s declaration of war on Germany
    in 1917.”54

    After stating that this “psychosis” was partly created by “emigrants from Germany and Czechoslovakia” who incited the American public
    against Germany by the use of “various calumnies,” he finally came to the topic of American sentiment towards Russia:

    “It is interesting to note that in this extremely well-planned campaign which
    is conducted above all against National Socialism, Soviet Russia is almost
    completely eliminated. Soviet Russia, if mentioned at all, is mentioned in a
    friendly manner and things are presented in such a way that it would seem
    that the Soviet Union were co-operating with the bloc of democratic states.
    Thanks to the clever propaganda the sympathies of the American public are
    completely on the side of Red Spain.”55
    (…)
    pp.450-51

    Comment by fnn — January 4, 2013 @ 5:40 am

  2. I was very interested in this article by Paul Grubach on Jared Diamond, and look forward to part two. I’ve read three of Diamond’s books and was unaware of his double-standards when Jewish and Zionist interests were in question.

    http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2011/volume_3/number_3/race_and_history_part_1.php

    Comment by The Black Rabbit of Inlé — January 4, 2013 @ 12:05 am

    • I’m not stalking you but it speaks volumes that you can say in all innocence apparently:

      “I’ve read three of Diamond’s books and was unaware of his double-standards when Jewish and Zionist interests were in question.”

      Reading three books by a left-thinking Jew and liking them (you must or you would not have read the 2nd and then the 3rd one) shows that you are in sympathy, at least, with that world viewpoint, or “Weltanschauung.” And that you don’t grasp the total opposition between the Jewish mind and the Aryan mind, and think that the differences can be bridged. No way, but only the Jews know that they must destroy their enemy altogether.

      Being British, you are part of a nation that has honored Jews, and SOLD OUT to Jews, for many centuries. I hope you can pull yourself out of this mindset 100%. Right now you might be at about 50%.

      Comment by Carolyn Yeager — January 5, 2013 @ 7:58 am

      • This quote is from Wikipedia:
        Begin quote:
        In 1290, King Edward I issued an edict expelling all Jews from England. Lasting for the rest of the Middle Ages, it would be over 350 years until it was formally overturned in 1656. The edict was not an isolated incident, but the culmination of over 200 years of conflict on the matters of usury. Oliver Cromwell encouraged Jews to return to England in 1657, over 350 years after their banishment by Edward I, in the hope that they would help speed up the recovery of the country after the disruption of the Civil Wars[citation needed].
        End quote

        The British have been making up for the expulsion of the Jews in 1290 ever since. Cromwell encouraged the Jews to return because he needed their money. This may be the same reason that the British now honor the Jews: they need their money.

        The Black Knight is an exception to the typical British mind set. We should all encourage him.

        Comment by furtherglory — January 5, 2013 @ 9:28 am

        • You’re so diplomatic, FG. That’s what I appreciate about you most.

          Comment by Carolyn Yeager — January 5, 2013 @ 7:54 pm

          • I appreciate the fact that you are fearless. You are not afraid to stand up to anyone, and to defend your beliefs.

            Comment by furtherglory — January 6, 2013 @ 6:04 am

  3. “The biggest winner was of course Poland which gained over 30,000 square miles and expelled 15 million Germans.”

    Poland didn’t gained so much. Don’t forget the whole country was litterally moved west at the end of WW2. USSR took a big part of Poland’s Eastern lands and Poland got lands from the vanquished of WW2 (Germany’s Western lands) in compensation.

    Comment by hermie — January 3, 2013 @ 6:18 pm

    • The lands lost to the Soviet Union by Poland were largely populated by Ukranians and less than a million Poles were forced west. The myth of the “lost eastern Polish lands ” are just that a myth.

      Comment by Pete — January 4, 2013 @ 12:53 am

      • “The lands lost to the Soviet Union by Poland were largely populated by Ukranians and less than a million Poles were forced west. The myth of the “lost eastern Polish lands ” are just that a myth.”

        I didn’t know that. Thanks for this explanation.

        Comment by hermie — January 4, 2013 @ 3:35 am

  4. Yes an excellent article because there are many groups and nations which benefit from the myth apart from the Zionists . Those nations which gained territory by ethnic cleansing post WW2 also need to maintain the myth. France, Russia, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia all got their bits of the Reich and expelled the German inhabitants. The biggest winner was of course Poland which gained over 30,000 square miles and expelled 15 million Germans.
    I see the BBC website has the death of an unknown pensioner as a headline. The article manages to get in the death of the 50 escapees on Hitler’s direct orders.It mentions he was a POW in Sagan which the article originally claimed was in ” Nazi occupied Poland ” ! Oh the irony. They have now corrected the original article.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-20899976

    Comment by Pete — January 3, 2013 @ 9:15 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: