Scrapbookpages Blog

December 28, 2014

Today is December 28th, the birthday of Woodrow Wilson

Filed under: Germany, World War II — Tags: , , — furtherglory @ 7:52 am

The world, as we know it  today, started with Woodrow Wilson’s 14 points. What would the world be like today, if Wilson had never been born?

My parents worshiped  Woodrow Wilson. That’s why I have studied his life and his influence on the world.

You can learn more about Woodrow Wilson’s private life from the video below.

 

9 Comments »

  1. Not useless to add that the Zionist leader Samuel Untermyer* manipulated and tricked Wilson into WW1, so that Stephen S. Wise** could later go to Europe and secure the Balfour declaration that had been induced by Chaim Weizmann*** a little earlier. The Zionist clique was already plotting and manipulating people in the highest spheres of power on an international scale at that time…

    * Later, the leader of the Jewish international boycott on German goods, intended to worsen the lot of Germany’s Jews and so ‘encourage’ as many German Jews as possible to pack their suitcases and move to Palestine.

    ** Top Zionist leader who led the American delegation at the post-WW1 so-called “peace conference” at Paris-Versailles and who later first brought the Holohoax on the stage of public opinion as a way to make Britain establish a Jewish state in Palestine and aloow large numbers of Jewish migrants there.

    *** Zionist leader who became Israël’s first president in 1948.

    Comment by hermie — December 29, 2014 @ 6:50 pm

    • Hermie! You recall only usual antisemit propaganda as above statements are foolishly baseless..

      Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — December 30, 2014 @ 3:00 am

      • As I see you want more, I’ll give you some, Wolfie.

        President of the [Zionist organization] Keren Hayesod Samuel “Jews are the aristocrats of the world” Untermyer was one of the numerous Jews surrounding President Wilson. Wilson had always been a womanizer. One day, his good ‘friend’ Samuel Untermyer (who was also a NY attorney) came to him with old embarrassing love letters proving that Wilson had had a sexual relationship with the wife of a Professor at Princeton University (a former colleague of Wilson’s). Untermyer told Wilson that his client was willing to accept $40,000 (a very big sum of money in the 1910’s) in lieu of commencing a breach of promise action against him. As Wilson did not have $40,000 available, Untermyer ‘generously’ offered to pay that sum out of his own pocket on one condition: that Wilson promise Untermeyer to appoint to the first vacancy on the United States Supreme court a nominee to be recommended to Wilson by Untermeyer. And that nominee was…Justice Louis Brandeis, the most prominent and most politically influential of all Zionists in the United States at that time. From that position, Brandeis became a close friend of Wilson’s and he was able to trick Wilson into WW1 quite easily.

        After the October 1916 agreement was concluded between the British War Cabinet and the World Zionist Organization (led by Chaim Weizmann), Justice Brandeis volunteered his opinion to president Wilson that the sinking of the S.S. Sussex by a German submarine in the English Channel (after informing the Germans that the SS Sussex was conveying weapons for the British war effort) with the loss of lives of United States citizens justified the declaration of war against Germany by the United States. Relying to a great extent upon the legal opinion of Justice Brandeis, President Wilson addressed both houses of Congress on April 2, 1917 and he appealed to Congress to declare war against Germany, what they did on April 7, 1917. Et voilà…

        Comment by hermie — December 30, 2014 @ 9:00 pm

        • Hermie! Interesting indeed So the puritan Wilson was a woomanizer who had an affair with a married woman.This is consistent with the hisotical fact that in 1916 Wilson had been elected again having assured not to enter the WWI. I will try to find out what kind of agreement had been reached in 1916 between the Britisch War Cabinet and the Zionist Organisation being affraid You are not exactly informed. A good opportunity to wish HAPPY NEW YEAR of further arguments and discussions.

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 1, 2015 @ 10:40 am

        • Hermie! Would You kindly let me know the source of that story of Wilson blackmailed by UK Secret Service through late Mr Untermyer who could easily state – even when not true – to have a client willing to sue with a following scandal. I believe that this had been only a mockery of the UK Secret Service which used Mr Untemyer as a tool. The following Balfour Declaration by itself had no menaingful practical results. How the UK Secret Service got that material or, at least, informations about Woodrow Wilson’s real behaviour, is another question. Clearly I regret that Europe did not follow the wise advice of than Pope to deal a reasonanle peace treaty in 1917.. Your help wpould be highly apreciated. Wolf.

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 1, 2015 @ 12:37 pm

          • Wolf M. wrote: “Hermie! Would You kindly let me know the source of that story of Wilson blackmailed by UK Secret Service through late Mr Untermyer who could easily state – even when not true – to have a client willing to sue with a following scandal. I believe that this had been only a mockery of the UK Secret Service which used Mr Untemyer as a tool.”

            Among other things, there are the words told by former Zionist Benjamin Freedman and Top Zionist leader Stephen Wise.

            Stephen S. Wise’s address before the Cleveland Conference on Palestine in November 1927 (for the 10th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration):

            “What did the British Government undertake to do? Let us see. Next Wednesday will be Balfour Day. November 2nd, a great day! Truly we may say, ‘Zeh ha-yom Asah Adonai,’–It is a day which God gave to the Jewish people and the Jewish hope! But what did the Balfour Declaration promise or affirm? You can not have forgotten the promise to ‘facilitate the establishment in Palestine of a Jewish National Home?’ What does ‘facilitate’ mean? With entire candor I make the confession that I define the term ‘facilitate’ differently from the way in which I defined it ten years ago,–the way in which I defined it five years ago. Surely even Zionists may learn something in the course of ten years. I insist upon giving content to ‘facilitate.’ When the Balfour Declaration was submitted, I said exactly as you did, that Great Britain would not give us Palestine, for a nation cannot give a land to another people. What we expected and asked of the Mandatory Government, which was not yet the Mandatory Government at the time of the Balfour Declaration, was that it keep the door open. We are so humble and modest in the things that we believe may be hoped for from them that are not unfriendly to us, that we reduced ‘facilitate’ to a minimum. A hundred times on the platforms of this and other cities of America I too have urged that what we ask of Great Britain is to keep the door open. As Miss Szold said, it had come about that there is only one door open to Jews. I have come to see that to facilitate means more than opening the door, because one may open a door and after the door has been opened, neutralize the effect of that open door.

            […]

            Has Great Britain as the Mandatory Government facilitated the creation of a Jewish Homeland in Palestine? No! I do not maintain that it has opposed or has made impossible such establishment. But ‘facilitation’ is a positive term. a term of affirmative content, and I am prepared to say to you today that the Mandatory Government has not facilitated the creation in Palestine of the Jewish Homeland. And this is said by one than whom, outsde of the number of British citizens, no man has done more with his voice and every power at his command to give and to win. within the limits of his loyalty to his own land, support and admiration for the British Government in war and in peace alike. This is not said by a Zionist in some Central European land who, after all, was not overmuch rejoiced ten years ago over Great Britain becoming the Mandatory Government for Palestine. It is said by one who had a part in bringing it to pass that the British Government took the responsibility for the Balfour Declaration. Great Britain would not have issued the Balfour Declaration, if some of us in America standing at President Wilson’s side had not moved the President of the United States to see the fitness of making an informal agreement with the British Government, without which the Balfour Declaration would never have been uttered. In those conferences with the President, wherein ours was the advantage of having Justice Brandeis as our chief spokesman, the speaker was one of two or three in America who in that sense helped to make possible the Balfour Declaration.”

            (http://www.jta.org/1927/11/04/archive/dr-wise-criticizes-british-policy-in-palestine-and-zionist-leadership)

            Comment by hermie — January 8, 2015 @ 8:59 am

        • Hermie! You will agree that conveying arms to UK was not compatible with neutrality and the sinking by a German submarine had been the logical result of that act of breaking neutrality. Clearly Wilson wanted to enter WWI and the legal opinion of Brandeis or others had not been necessary at all. I think that Wilson followed the interest of Henry Ford, the banker Morgan, Rockefeller and similar white, Anglo-Saxon and Protestant tycoons looking for the opportunity to make a great profit on the ruins in Europe.

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 2, 2015 @ 10:11 am

          • Wolf M. wrote: “You will agree that conveying arms to UK was not compatible with neutrality and the sinking by a German submarine had been the logical result of that act of breaking neutrality.”

            Clearly.

            Wolf M. wrote: “Clearly Wilson wanted to enter WWI and the legal opinion of Brandeis or others had not been necessary at all.”

            The U.S. declaration of war on the Central Powers came 2 years after the sinking of the Lusitania. Waiting for 2 years before acting is not what leaders who want to enter a war on any excuse do. Something happened between 1915 and 1917. That’s where the Zionist plotters and blackmailers came and successfully dragged America into WW2, so buying Palestine with Gentile blood…

            Top Zionist leader [and future first President of Israël] Chaim Weizmann boasted about that during WW2, when he offered Churchill to do the same thing in the current war. “We can do it again”, Weizmann told Churchill, and the most knowledgeable people know that’s what Zionists did again during WW2.

            And Wilson had been re-elected by the Americans of German ancestry because he had promised not to enter WW1 against Germany. Hard to turn him into a warmonger whose political interests required the American intervention in WW1. Intense pressure had to be exterted on him and it was.

            Wolf M. wrote: “I think that Wilson followed the interest of Henry Ford, the banker Morgan, Rockefeller and similar white, Anglo-Saxon and Protestant tycoons looking for the opportunity to make a great profit on the ruins in Europe.”

            So the deceitful forged status of eternal innocent victims which some Jews have so carefully manufactured through decades for the martyrology-based ‘history’ of Jewry is saved. Nice job, Wolfie…😉

            Comment by hermie — January 8, 2015 @ 9:22 am

  2. I believe that Wodroow Wilson imposed at Versailles a “Punishing Peace Treaty” instead of a “Reasonable Treaty”. So, in Germany and Austria the democratic statesmen – who had been against WWI starting – were compelled to place continous restriction on their people enforcing so nationalistic racist politcal groups. The east european states had increasing difficulties to place their agricultural product in the impoverished German and Austrian market and vice versa German industrial products could hardly benn place in customary east european markets. Who worshiped Wilson or Hitler or Mussolini etc. simply does not know that only G’D can be worshiped. Clear?

    Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — December 28, 2014 @ 8:32 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: