Scrapbookpages Blog

June 23, 2015

My review of “Auschwitz: Hitler’s Final Solution”

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust — Tags: , , — furtherglory @ 10:10 am

Last night, I watched a new TV special entitled “Auschwitz: Hitler’s Final Solution.”

Let me say, right off the bat, the show was not as bad as I was expecting. There were lots of good aspects of the show.  For example, the name of the Auschwitz commandant, Rudolf Höss was pronounced correctly. (It sounds something like “Hearse.”)

Since the title of the show included the name Auschwitz, not Auschwitz-Birkenau, I was expecting the show to be about the main Auschwitz camp, but the show started off by showing aerial footage of the huge 425 acre Birkenau camp with it’s huge number of wooden barracks, as the narrator told us that 1.1 million people had died at this place.  This indicates that this show was made recently, since the number of deaths is now down from the original 4 million, that was claimed at the Nuremberg IMT,  to 1.1 million, claimed by the current official Auschwitz website.

Then we see the railroad tracks on the inside of the Birkenau camp with the Gate of Death faintly shown in the background.

Finally, we get to the start of the show, which is labeled “Origins – April 1940”.  So it turns out that the show is going to be about the main Auschwitz camp where Rudolf Höss was the first Commandant. We see a shiny black car, traveling towards us, on what looks like a dirt road.  I think that this scene is authentic because, when I first went to Poland in 1998, the roads looked a lot like this.

One of the best things about the show is that Rudolf Höss is humanized. One scene shows him getting his hair cut by a prisoner who says, on the show, that he could have easily slit the Commandant’s throat, but it would have meant his own death, and the new Commandant could have been worse.

At the very end of the show, Rudolf Höss is shown as a loving father, sitting around the fire, with his arms around his children. That’s how one of his daughters has described him. How could such a nice man have killed all those Jews.  Stay tuned for more.

Color photos are shown of the red roof tops of the barracks buildings in the main camp, as we are given the first mistaken information about the main camp. We are told that these building date back to 1940, when the main Auschwitz camp was “a former Polish Army barracks.”  We are told that the main camp was “not for Jews, but for “Polish political prisoners.”  Close, but no cigar. The main camp was first used for illegal combatants, who were fighting as “resistance fighters.”

But to get back to the origins of the main Auschwitz camp, it was built as a camp with barracks for farm workers who stayed there between  jobs, and traveled by train to work on farms throughout Poland.

Auschwitz was the main railroad hub in Europe.  From Auschwitz, a person could go anywhere in Europe, without changing trains.  I wrote about this on this previous blog post:

As the show continues, we learn that “in 1940, the motto of Dachau was put over  the gate into the main Auschwitz camp.”  Of course, we are not told the real meaning of this slogan and why it was put on the main Auschwitz camp, but not on the gate at Birkenau. I wrote about the meaning of the “Arbeit Macht Frei” sign on this blog post:

It is not long before the show gets to the first big lie: a fake photo of “pole hanging.”

This photo is a still shot from a film

This photo is a still shot from a film made by the Soviet Union

I took the photo above in the Museum at Dachau in May 2001. The photo, which is a depiction of the alleged tree hanging punishment at Buchenwald, was not included in the new Museum at Dachau which opened in May 2003.

According to Harold Marcuse, Professor of History at the University of California at Santa Barbara, this scene was created in 1958 for an East German DEFA film, which is why the photo is no longer used. Reference: H. Obenaus, “Das Foto vom Baumhängen: Ein Bild geht um die Welt,” in Stiftung Topographie des Terrors Berlin (ed.), Gedenkstätten-Rundbrief no. 68, Berlin, October 1995, pp. 3-8.

Right after the fake photo is shown, we see some photos of the house where Rudolf Hoess lived.  Then, after a commercial, we see the red roofs of the main camp again. We are told that Auschwitz was located in an area where there was lots of coal, and that the IG Farben company needed coal for their factories where synthetic rubber was being made. We are told that Heinrich Himmler visited the town of Auschwitz, and that the residents were thrown out so that Germans could take over the town.

According to this show, Hitler wanted to “reshape entire countries.”  We are told that Hitler thought that the Russians were “inferior human beings” and that he was “planning mass starvation in the Soviet Union.”  We are told that “the Nazis envisioned the extermination of 3 million Russians in the Soviet Union.”

Then we get to the crux of the matter: “The Jews had lost World War I for Germany.”  I believe that this is correct. Hitler turned against the Jews because he believed that they were the cause of Germany losing World War I.

We were shown photos of Jews being beaten in Ukraine. We were told that 10,000 Jews were gathered in Ukraine and then taken out and shot. We are shown the footage of the dead Jews falling into ditches as they are shot.  But the narrator says: “the Jews cheated the Germans.”  At last, a reason for why the Germans killed the Jews. I never thought that I would ever hear that on TV.

As we see film footage of the survivors of Birkenau marching out, we hear that we are usually told that the Jews were killed for no reason, but a former German soldier, who is on the show, says that “they were killed for a reason.”

I thought that the show would never get around to the gas chambers, but finally the big day arrives and we hear that it was in the Summer of 1941 that prisoners were first “killed by gassing.”

At that point, I thought that we would see a photo of the gas chamber in the main Auschwitz camp, but no, we are told that the gassing started with the “gibbering idiots” and “disabled children” and was then extended to “disabled adults”.

I thought that, at this point, we would see a photo of the gas chamber at Hartheim castle, but no! We are told about another place, that I have never heard of, where the “disabled were sent into a shower room,” and “carbon monoxide was turned on.”

We are told that “the first Auschwitz prisoners were sent to Germany to be gassed, and that these were “worn out prisoners who could no longer work.”  Unfortunately, the location of the gas chamber in Germany was not mentioned.

Finally, we get to the first gassing at Auschwitz. This was the experiment that was allegedly done in Block 11 in the main camp. It was mentioned that “the windows were blocked with sand.”  I have written about this on my website and on this blog post:

The detail about the window being blocked with sand makes me think that this story is a lie. I don’t think that any German person would ever do something like that. It would have been difficult to get the sand out of the window well, although not impossible.

Block 11 had window wells around the basement windows

Block 11 had window wells around the basement windows

Finally, the show gets around to the first homicidal gas chamber where Jews were killed in the Holocaust. I thought that we would see some  photos of the inside of the gas chamber in the main Auschwitz camp, but no! All we see is a photo of the door into the gas chamber, similar to my photo below.

Door into the gas chamber in the Auschwitz main camp

Door into the gas chamber in the Auschwitz main camp

Why can’t we see a photo of the gas chamber in the main camp? Is it because people in the audience would die laughing?

Then we see a photo of two ovens in the gas chamber building, but no photo of the gas chamber room.  The photo of the ovens was similar to my photo below.

A photo of the ovens in the main Auschwitz camp was shown in the docutmentary

A photo of the ovens in the main Auschwitz camp was shown in the documentary

During the show, there were extensive quotes from the confessions of Rudolph Hoess, but there was no mention that these were confessions obtained by many days of British soldiers torturing Hoess. I have quoted his confessions on this page of my website:

Rudolf Hoess appears to be afraid of the nice British officer

Rudolf Hoess appears to be afraid of the nice British officer

It should have been explained in the show that Rudolf Hoess confessed after many days of being kept awake and tortured.  The photo above shows that he is afraid of the British officer who is talking to him. However, the words from his confession were quoted in the show,  as the absolute truth, without saying that these were the words of Rudolf Hoess after many days of torture.


  1. In the Auschwitz Final Solution “Exploitation” 2015 (Captions by Vitac) , the narrator has the military rank correct (Lt. Col.) , but the surname sounded to me as Hess , not Höss (Obersturmbannführer Rudolf Franz Ferdinand Höss {25 November 1900–16 April 1947) •

    The Vitac caption read Rudolf Hess (Rudolf Walter Richard Heß, also spelled Hess (26 April 1894–17 August 1987), •

    Comment by Docile Jim Brady – Bend OR 97702 — September 14, 2015 @ 3:23 pm

  2. Is this the same doco as the British 2005 “Auschwitz – The Nazis And The Final Solution” [2005]

    Comment by Scott — July 14, 2015 @ 12:12 pm

  3. One last thing before I go:
    I myself am not Jewish. My parents raised me as a Roman Catholic. I share that fact with Adolph Hitler. Hitler himself was not German, he was from Austria, a predominantly Roman Catholic country at the time he was born. Another ironic fact that two of the most powerful men of the 20th Century ( and who headed two of the bloodiest governments ever known) were not natives of those countries. Joseph Stalin was not Russian, he was Georgian.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 2:47 am

    • I have read all this with interest because I am a Classical Historian. I just surf around when I am caught up with my postings. Anyhow Don’t forget, Joseph Stalin was NOT his real name. His real name was Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili and he was Jewish, actually Khazar for Jew. Same for Leon Trotsky whose real name was Lev Davidovich Bronshtein. And the same also applies for Lenin whose real name was Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov. All the above were Jews. Matter of fact ALL the Bolsheviks were Jews and most carried alias names in order to protect their true identity. Of the 380 top Bolshevik leaders 360 were Khazars. Only 4 of the reminder had no ties to Jews.

      I could rattle of this stuff, factoids for days, like a machine gun!
      I’m not even warmed up, but thought you would like to know for the record.

      I don’t know if I will be notified of any responses but if you wish to find me I post related historical notes such as this on my FB Wall. I will be listed as Mike Lamb from Stokesdale.

      Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
      Classical Historian Western Civilization

      Comment by Mike Lamb — October 25, 2015 @ 5:53 pm

      • Lenin Uljanov was no way Jewish and Stalin Dsugaswilli attendend the Ortodox Pope College of Tiflis and had been first in his heart and than in his deed driven by anti-Semitism. Indeed Trotzki Bernstein had to flee and other leaders of Jewish ancestry were among the stalinian purges victims. What the hell are you saying here? Are you a nazi propaganda sprayer?

        Comment by o — October 26, 2015 @ 8:07 am

        • Common knowledge for anyone who takes the time to look the people for themselves. You OTOH depends on the laziness of people NOT taking the time to look up the truth. In which case you will spread your propaganda to any of those lazy people who will not take the time to look for the truth. I told the truth and you are highly offended by it. This tells me that you are the one who is anti- -(you fill in the blank). You have an agenda to fulfill and it includes opposes anyone who disagrees with you and your family’s agenda. It matters not how truthful something is, if it goes against you and your family’s agenda, then it is a lie and the messenger MUST be confronted, and if possible punished.

          I am not saying that there wasn’t a Holocaust in Germany, there was. But it didn’t come anywhere near the 6 million Jews that is claimed were killed. Official estimates put it at 282,000. Plus the vast majority of these deaths came the last 2 years of the war when Germany could not even feed itself, much less transport enuff food to all the prison camps. Finally there was a greater number of non-Jews killed at those camps than Jews, and they suffered the same way. Maybe one should also take the time to study just what kinds of *other* people were in those camps.

          The 6 million came from the Jewish powers of influence, used in order to excrete as much money as possible from the defeated Germans and anyone else. There are even writings of their conspiring to do so. All people has to do is take the time to Google. Something you hope they never do.

          Now, shall we go to the Christian Holocaust the Jews committed against over 50 million Christians?
          It goes two way; ya’know?

          Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
          Classical Historian Western Civilization

          Comment by Mike Lamb — October 28, 2015 @ 10:21 am

          • Your Anti Semitism brings to write clear non sense. In East and Central Europe almost the entire great Jewish Comunity disappeared. What the hell of Holocaust could the Jews committ against Christians? For centuries Christians of different Churches slaughtered each other and the Jews stood between ambiss and hammer and were used as scapegoats by the many dominators and hate preachers. Seat down on Your ass and study really history,

            Comment by o — October 29, 2015 @ 11:08 am

            • OOoops, you just made another *Significant* goof!
              Sadly or gladly I must admit, I am NOT anti-Semite!
              Several reasons for this too. Which all of them then prove you to be not a truthful person, even purposely telling them wrong.

              1- I like Palestinians and even some Turks. I also like Syrians.
              Guess what? All of them are SEMITES!

              2- I even like True Torah Jews alright. Of course you know they don’t like the Khazar Jews either, because they also know who they really are. But guess what else? True Torah Jews are also Semites!

              3- But most of all; guess what else; Not all Khazars are actually Semites!

              Why do you accuse me of being anti-Semite when you know it is not so?
              Why do you want to spread (mis-truths) about others?
              Why do you knowingly false accuse me?
              What else are planning to wrong claim against me?
              Or another goy?
              Would I be wrong in claiming you are anti-white, or anti-Christian? Or anti-anything?
              Try me and see….

              Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
              Classical Historian Western Civilization

              Comment by Mike Lamb — October 29, 2015 @ 8:43 pm

              • Looks like I nailed o’s coffin shut…
                Another one bites the dust…..
                Problem is, while I have the Truth on these demons, I cannot fight all of them by myself.
                I cannot fight their system when they control the governments, education, banking and the mass media news organizations that furnishes you your propaganda. Is not there anyone who wishes to learn the Truth, the Truth as the Khazars themselves made, and has proven to everyone by their works and even their writings?
                So sad, you folks don’t even realize these Khazars are leading you and the world to WWIII and not only do you not see it, you even deny it and are offended by someone suggesting it. To which I can only say, time is on my side. I’ve been patient for a long long time, I guess another year or there abouts won’t matter.

                Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
                Classical Historian Western Civilization

                Comment by Mike Lamb — October 30, 2015 @ 6:51 pm

  4. Well, I think that’s it for me, it’s getting late. I hope you enjoy the posts, though I suspect you will not have the courage to leave them up. I’ll drop in on occasion to read things on your website and post some more if you don’t block me.
    BTW, just curious. Is your Holocaust Denial based upon good old fashioned Anti-Semitic attitudes or is it something else? I find Holocaust Denial fascinating, it’s like someone said Napolean was a six foot tall guy from NewJersey who spent his life scrap booking. Or Venezuela won WWII.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 2:33 am

    • Go down through here. You’ll see FG leaves a everything up. FG is a journalist ( university of Missouri I think). As any good journalist would do,FG welcomes opinions from both sides. Check out our 2 friends on here. Hermit and Wolf. Those 2 are always going at it. I told one of them I was gonna book Ceaser’s Palace and let them step in the ring and go at it. As long as you’re not overly abusive on here,FG will respect your opinions .

      Comment by Tim — July 5, 2015 @ 8:02 am

      • I have just pulled one of the comments by P.O. Truth out of the trash bin. His last comment was classified as spam. This happened because he wrote several comments in a short space of time.

        Comment by furtherglory — July 5, 2015 @ 8:16 am

        • Okay. I just figured the person thought this was a jew hating website. That’s why I told the individual you welcome all comments so long as the person making them is not abusive.

          Comment by Tim — July 5, 2015 @ 8:56 am

    • I am not a “Holocaust denier”. I quoted Lawrence Rees extensively on this page of my website:

      I also quoted Lawrence Rees on this page of my website:

      Not only do I not indulge in “Holocaust denial”, I give tips on my blog about how to avoid writing something or showing photos that promote denial:

      To what does the P.O. in your name refer? You were writing comments at 2:30 in the morning. Are you located in the UK or were you just staying up late at night in America?

      Comment by furtherglory — July 5, 2015 @ 9:57 am

      • Told ya. This person thought this was a jew hater site. That’s why I told this person you welcome comments from both sides. Why don’t you ask this person what they think of the “rape of Nan King ” and all the peice of shit Ruskies rhat went door to door abusing the women when they rolled into Berlin. Well this person said they were a student of history

        Comment by Tm — July 5, 2015 @ 4:12 pm

        • The fact that the Red Army committed atrocities is well documented. Not only did they commit rape but they also committed murder during the invasion of Germany. They also stole anything they could get their hands on, from watches to dismantling factories and power plants. During the 1930’s, in the name of industrializing the USSR, Stalin deliberately starved to death some three million Ukrainians between 1932-1933. During the Great Terror, Stalin initiated extensive ethnic cleansing of the USSR, targeting ethnic Poles, Germans, Jews and other minorities. The death toll is not clear but it is estimated that somewhere in the range of 600,000-700,000 Soviet citizens lost their lives.
          After the Germans and Soviets successfully conquered Poland in 1939, Beria, Stalin’s Security Chief, recommended the execution of some 20,000 Polish officers. Stalin agreed and I believe these executions were carried out in the Spring of 1940. This caused considerable embarrassment to the Soviet Government when the Soviets and Poles became allies after the Germans invaded the USSR in 1941. After the Germans discovered one of the sites at Katyn in 1943, this caused a rift in the relationship between Poland and the USSR. This continues to be a problem in Russian and Polish relations to this day.
          Do we all feel better now that I’ve aired Communist dirty laundry? By the way, I’ve always felt that under any equitable settlement Stalin should also have gotten a noose at the of WWII for what he did to his own people.

          Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 7:07 pm

          • The Red Army also committed rape and murder in Yugoslavia, Hungary, Romania and Poland. One of Tito’s representatives complained to Stalin and Stalin shrugged it off.

            Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 7:52 pm

            • Papa Joe was the douchebag from hell. His men on the line were made to walk through mine fields. Don’t tell me Stalin didn’t know about that. when he heard stuff like that,he got off on it like a fat dog. I did my fair share of point when I went to ‘Nam,but it was never to play suicidal mine sweeper. This is what puts a weed up my ass about all this. You don’t have to Oppenheimer to figure out the Krauts “didn’t ” come up with the idea of genocide. Stalin killed way more than Adolph. I’ve heard estimates of 20 million. Now when it comes to hitler,they’ve got an “exact” number. 6 million. I get to thinkin why the Ruskies never had a case put on them for their stunt they pulled in Berlin. Then again how would you explain to a savage that kind of wrong doing,when empathy is no in their vocabulary? I think the reasons are quite simple. They were one of the allies and Ike told everyone the Reds and no one else,are to take Berlin. If Patton took Berlin,the sick shit the Ruskiespulled would’ve never happened. I’ve told people before,I dont hate jews. What I hate are the lies that they and their puppets propagate. Heres a perfect “tall tale” of the jews. Dachau was not liberated by the 761st ( Pattons Panthers). Now Rabbi Lau has his own little BS story on that. He said when he was liberated at dachau,” a big black soldier picked me up by my feet and put me on his shoulder. Good story rabbi,to bad it was a lie. Sad part here,history is written by those who write it. Long as that goes on,the truth will never come out.

              Comment by Tm — July 6, 2015 @ 2:23 pm

          • Society would have fared better had Stalin been hanged in about 1917 (or stillborn – he could not have suffered child abuse) •

            Comment by Docile Jim Brady – Bend OR 97702 — September 14, 2015 @ 1:11 pm

      • Actually I was having trouble sleeping last night when I came across your website. I found it interesting. I’ll continue to come back to see what else you’ve written.
        Here are some more good books on WWII:
        Andrew Roberts The Storm of War
        Richard J. Evans The Coming of the Third Reich, The Third Reich in Power and The Third Reich at War (The Third Reich Trilogy)
        William Shirer The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich (somewhat dated but the info is still good. I disagree with the idea that Hitler was inevitable or that Germans are predisposed towards authorianism. I forgive Shirer his somewhat biased view, he lived through the beginnings of the Third Reich and he despised authoritarian governments.)
        Good books about the Holocaust:
        Saul Friedlander’s The Years of Extermination: Nazi Germany and the Jews, 1939-1945 (I liked this because Friedlander honestly looked at the various relationships between Jews of different countries.)
        Christopher Brownings Ordinary Men ( Though I disagreed with his premise that group pressures could drive men to kill. I think he down played the effect of indoctrination and native Anti-Semitism. I also felt he did not take into effect racism had on these men and on the German army in general. The German army willingly committed atrocities in Poland against non-Jewish Poles and the original Einsatzcommando groups in Poland targeted non-Jewish Polish elites.)

        Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 7:47 pm

        • Thanks for the reading list. I read “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich” over 50 years ago. Then someone gave me a used copy of a First Edition of this book.

          I read “Ordinary Men” many years ago.

          It is hard for me to settle down and read a long book now. I purchased Sarah Helm’s book entitled “If this is a Woman” several month’s ago, and still haven’t read all of it. What little I did read was BORING, BORING, BORING.

          Comment by furtherglory — July 6, 2015 @ 7:24 am

  5. Well, this has been fun. I could go on but I’m getting tired and it’s getting late. I hope you enjoy reading my comments even though I’m pretty sure you’ll delete them because you don’t have the courage to leave them up. I’ll drop back by on occasion to post more if you don’t block me. I have more info to share, info that comes from reputable historians.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 2:24 am

    • The comment above was put in the spam folder by wordpress. I pulled it out of spam and allowed it.

      Comment by furtherglory — July 5, 2015 @ 8:36 am

  6. I do find it interesting that you don’t deny that Germans shot Jews during WWII. You seem to justify this by saying Germans shot Jews because Jews cheated them, implying that the cheating just occurred. What you neglect to mention is that the Einsatzcommando being interviewed states he willingly murdered Jews because of the world view he devoloped as a child when he was told by adults that Jews cheated non-Jews. The Jews he shot during WWII never personally harmed him.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 2:19 am

  7. Did you know that the Isreali Government paid Eichman’s defense attorney and even passed a law enabling him to practice law in Isreal? This defense attorney represented defendants at the original Nuremberg trials. The defense attorney was not Jewish.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 2:11 am

  8. Not even Eichman at his trial in Isreal denied that the Holocaust ever happened. Israeli officials broadcast the trial. I don’t know about you, but if I faced the death penalty and the trial was broadcast, the moment the camera turned to me I’d jump up and scream”I didn’t do it!!!!!!” They are trying to put me to death for some thing I didn’t do!!!!!!” Instead, Eichman repeatedly asserted that he was a very minor cog in the machine, did not influence those above him and did not make policy.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 2:07 am

  9. Here is another fun, yet ironic historical fact:
    The German officer that recommended Adolph Hitler for the Iron Cross, First Class was Jewish. Hitler wore that Iron Cross proudly for the rest of his life.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 1:58 am

  10. Here is a fun fact of history that is also extremely ironic:
    During WWI, the (anti-Semitic) German High Command, worrying that German Jews were ducking out of their civic duty of serving in the Military by serving behind the lines, ordered a study completed showing what percentage Jews made up of military casualties. They expected to find Jews practically nonexistent. What they actually found was that Jews died and were injured at the same rate as Non-Jewish Germans. This is amazing considering that Jews in Germany made up a very small percentage of the population.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 1:54 am

  11. As you can tell, I’ve read a great deal about the Holocaust. I majored in history at school and WWII history fascinates me. I’ve also read a great deal about WWI. Your assertion that Jews cost Germany WWI completely disregards the military reality at the time. Though German troops still held French soil, the combination of the U.S. sending fresh troops plus the effects of the allied blockade forced the German surrender.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 1:43 am

  12. BTW, you must have missed it but the show does give the detail that British soldiers tortured Hoess. Rees also mentions this in his book. Like any respectable historian Rees gives complete details. What you forgot to mention is that Hoess never recanted, even under the threat of a death sentence. As a matter of fact, as far as I can tell, none of the Nazis convicted of crimes ever denied that atrocities ever occurred only that they were following orders.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 1:34 am

  13. I also recommend you read Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka: the Operation Reinhard Camps, I think the name of the author is Avi Arad. There are others but if you are an Amazon Prime Member they are free with your membership. You can download the books to a Kindle or Amazon app.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 1:25 am

  14. Oh crap, I accidentally wandered onto a denier website. Oops, I was trying to see if the show advertised on AHC was the same program I’d watched on Netflix. I also read the book written by an excellent British author, Laurence Rees. For those of you who are interested in actual history, I recommend you read the book by Laurence Rees and watch this program. For those of you who have Netflix, they recently added a program called Aushwitz: Blue Prints of Genocide. It is excellent.

    Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 1:18 am

    • What section does Netflix have it in? I was looking,but don’t see it yet. I found a couple movies on Himmler

      Comment by Tim — July 5, 2015 @ 7:23 am

      • Type Auschwitz: Blueprints of Genocide in the search engine. This will pull it up. I’m looking at it right now.

        Comment by P. O. Truth — July 5, 2015 @ 6:42 pm

  15. I, myself a Shoah special child survivior, avoid to watch such films or certain hypocrite talks in TV. In my opinion we need to study historical background of those events. So one can learn that the nazi doctrine had been racist. Jews were supposed to be exterminated – but meanwhile forced to emigrate until … – while other nations of East EuropeHitl were supposed to be put in slavery. Hitler did not care about details; that was up to Himmler, Heydrich, Goering, etc. etc. As to the above post; who and where produced that film? Thanks for the information.

    Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — June 23, 2015 @ 1:33 pm

    • Expound on “put into slavery ” please. I told you before,I’m trying to get both sides of the story. As for the show FG watched,keep an eye on the “military channel “. They’re slow to pick up new shows. You’ll probably be able to see it again In the next 2 to 3 weeks. They’ll more than likely be showing ,” the rise and fall of the third reich” along with,” hitlers Jurassic park.” Just keep an eye out for the showtimes.

      Comment by Tim — June 23, 2015 @ 1:51 pm

    • …certain hypocrite talks in TV.

      For example?

      Comment by eah — June 23, 2015 @ 1:56 pm

    • In Hitler’s day, the word “racist” was unknown in the USA and it was probably unknown in Germany too. The concept of racism was unknown back then. I know because I was child in grade school back then. In the 1930s and 1940s, everyone believed that there were differences between races, and it was not wrong to point out these differences.

      The “nazi doctrine” was that Germany should be a nation for ethnic Germans, not a diversified country for people from every place in the world and for people of every religion in the world.

      Comment by furtherglory — June 24, 2015 @ 7:15 am

      • FG. Speaking of race,how come nobody ever brings up the fact that, eugenics did not start with the nazis. They wanna blame hitler for coming down on the Hebs ? I read as early as 1909 this shit was going on in California . I also read something about the Hebs wanting to keep isreal pure,so they’ve got marriage laws now concerning the Hebs .

        Comment by Tim — June 24, 2015 @ 8:02 am

        • I wrote about the start of eugenics, in America, on this page of my website:

          Follow the link at the bottom of the page to see the next page.

          Comment by furtherglory — June 24, 2015 @ 10:11 am

          • Did they start gassing the folks at this castle before they started gassing jews? The reason I ask is because when they first started to rub the Jews out,they pumped em full of lead. If they already had technology for the gas houses,why not just continue in that direction. The floor plan was well thought out. It didn’t look like something Billy Bob threw together out his wood scrap pile. While we’re on the subject,how come none of the staff at the castle were never bought up on murder charges? I guess they’re not as worthy as the Jews .

            Comment by Tim — June 24, 2015 @ 12:05 pm

      • The doctrine of the German as master nation in Europe with Jews to be exterminated and other nation put in slavery working for the German masters goes back to 1500/1510 in the HUNDRED CHAPTER BOOK written by the OBERREINLAENDISCHER REVOLUTIONAER and pubblished again in 1893. The idea of an European Area under German rule from the North Sea to the Adria, from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea and from the Marne to the Memel with Poland for the settlement of German farmers – who so should have avoided emigration to America – and Jews to be shipped to Madagascar had been pubblished in 1875 by Paul De Lagarde – Paul Boetiker – a professor of Goetingen University.And I could quote many other German “thinkers” who exposed similar ideas. All those had been picked up by the Nazis for their political programm.

        Comment by Wolf MURMELSTEIN — June 24, 2015 @ 9:00 am

        • Is this the Hundred Chapter book to which you are referring?

          Comment by furtherglory — June 24, 2015 @ 10:16 am

          • No! The manuscript is dated to around 1510 and supposed to have been writen by a Chancelor of Emperor Maximilian who had already to face Ottoman offensives. This book had be mad available to public in 1893.

            Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — June 24, 2015 @ 10:53 am

        • So hitler wanting to be the Donald Trump of his day by annexing pretty much all of the European nations,is really nothing new,right. You said it goes back to the 1500’s. You said people of these nations would become slaves to the Jerries? Why not just do that with the Jews ? I mean when we had slavery here in the states,every black person was a slave. The babies are born and taken care of by the younger slave children. The Momas went back to the fields. Why bump off children under 15 ( I think that’s what the age was) . Hell the preteen slave children would run errands for the masters,take water to the adults working the fields. I’m sure hitler knew from a practical point,the only ones of no use would’ve been the old ones. Hell I’m pretty sure hitler could’ve sold a bunch to the Muslim nation for their slaves. I’m sure he could’ve gotten on the horn to some Muslim leaders and said ,” hello boys! I’m Monty Hall. Welcome to Lets Make a Deal! How much you give me for the Jews ?

          Comment by Tim — June 24, 2015 @ 11:34 am

          • Hitler offered the Arab Nationalist leaders to “settle” the Jews in the “East Europe”! where they were supposed to disappear for bad environment condition, deseases, heavy work etc. Then, in 1941/42 in war time and in order to fasten the extermination of Jews they started the extermination mainly in the Gas Chambers. These are the facts. Hitler wanted the help of the Arabs in order to reach the Oil Fields but considered them as Semites too. But the space of this reply is quite short to explain the conclusions of my historical research. The South State slavery was more rational then the Nazi doctrine. Clear? Good bye.

            Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — June 24, 2015 @ 12:32 pm

      • The nazis took and developed politcally former old doctrines of the German nation destinated to rule on Europe and fight the then crescent Ottoman Empire. In 1875 a certain Paul Boetiler-Paul de la Guard developed the doctrine of a vast Central and East European Aread under German rule – from the Baltic to the Black Sea and from the North Sea to the Adriatic Sea – with Poland to be settled by German peasants; the Jews shipped to Madagascar (!). You see that nazism has deep roots.

        Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — July 5, 2015 @ 1:48 am

        • Where did the Ruskies come in at ? You said German peasants were to populate Poland,but hitler and papa Joe decided to split it in half

          Comment by Tim — July 5, 2015 @ 7:34 am

    • ” In my opinion we need to study historical background of those events”…yeah, we sure do! and since Hitler “did not care about details”, maybe you can show us the written orders where he left it up “Himmler, Heydrich, Goering, etc. etc” to do it all…

      Comment by schlageter — June 24, 2015 @ 12:27 pm

  16. You got me to thinkin about something. You said the “pole picture” was BS. You said it’s a still from a movie made by the Reds. What about the pics we see of the Krauts puttin one in the base of the skulls of the Jews. Is it possible some of those could be BS too? You’re the one who said ,”be critical of WW2 pictures”.

    Comment by Tim — June 23, 2015 @ 12:12 pm

  17. The shekels will keep on flowing, ultimately paid for by western taxpayers.

    The malicious predator picked up and ran with the story that the Soviets made up in order to destroy the German High Command, which would effectively distract from the serious atrocities committed by Allied nations (British and US firebombing of German cities, Soviet murder of Polish officers/intelligentsia at Katyn in Poland, to name merely two examples). The fanciful tale suited the Khazarian aliens perfectly as it permitted them to push for the creation of the state of Israel.

    “Oh woe is us! You murdered six million of us in gas chambers and burnt the bodies in cremation ovens (hence the term ‘holocaust’)! Now give us our own country, free trains and submarines (from Germany), reparations payments up the wazoo for all ‘survivors’ (also Germany), and $3.5 billion per year in ‘aid’ payments (from USA, to spend on military equipment). Plus, us a bonus, let us kill and oppress the people whose land we stole, but never question us about it, because that would make you anti-semites!

    They must now continue to bash us over the head with this, over and over, forever and ever. If enough people ever woke up to the truth, it would be ‘game over’ for them.

    Comment by Jan — June 23, 2015 @ 11:26 am

  18. Well done, a good post. I haven’t seen this particular film but have noted recently that some official media outlets have changed the way they describe Auschwitz. Only today there was a BBC radio report that mentioned Auschwitz as a ‘nazi concentration camp’. No mention of death camp or extermination camp. Maybe they are at last getting the message that the story of six million dead jews and gas chambers used for mass murder are total BS.

    Comment by Clent — June 23, 2015 @ 10:39 am

    • AIU (As I Understand) Auschwitz began as a concentration camp and evolved to a death camp •

      Comment by Docile Jim Brady – Bend OR 97702 — September 14, 2015 @ 1:30 pm

      • The website that you gave is hopelessly out of date. This quote is from that website:

        “Historians and analysts estimate the number of people murdered at Auschwitz somewhere between 2.1 million to 4 million, of whom the vast majority were Jews. The majority of prisoners held at Auschwitz were killed in the various gas chambers though many died from starvation, forced labor, disease, shooting squads, and heinous medical experiments.”

        The latest numbers for the number of deaths at Auschwitz is 1.1 million, of which 900,000 were Jews. The number of Jewish deaths at Majdanek is now officially down to 59,000.

        However the total number of deaths in the Holocaust is still 6 million. That number is sacred and it never changes.

        Comment by furtherglory — September 14, 2015 @ 2:02 pm

        • Oh cmon! Somebody please make up my mind. First it was 6 million. Then it was 4 million. Now we’re down to a million and a half ? With all the money and resources they have,they can’t come up with a number everyone can agree on?

          Comment by Tim — September 14, 2015 @ 2:17 pm

          • The total number of Jews killed in the Holocaust has ALWAYS been 6 million. It is only the numbers of dead Jews in the individual camps that has changed. The number of dead Jews at the three Auschwitz camps has gone from 4 million down to 1.1 million of which 900,000 were Jews. This does not change the sacred number of 6 million.

            At the Nuremberg IMT, the Soviets testified that there were 1.5 million deaths at Majdanek, including 400,000 Jews. Those numbers are now down to 78,000 total deaths, including 59,000 Jews. Still the number of Jewish deaths in the Holocaust is 6 million and will always be 6 million. If you deny this, you will spend up to 5 years in prison in 19 different countries.

            Comment by furtherglory — September 14, 2015 @ 2:46 pm

            • This is what I’m referring to when I tell people I’m here trying to figure out what is really going on. This still don’t make sense. I went to look up some more about the numbers to better understand this better. All I did was get in deeper trying to figure this crap out. I ran across a Lucy Dawidowitz. I swear this lady could probably piss off the pope. Okay I got the Jew virtual library saying 3 mill Jews killed in Poland. The next closest number there is ,900,000 . Those came out of the Ukraine. Yep . This is why they don’t people questioning the holocaust. They’ll start to put 2 and 2 and smell a rat in the woodshed

              Comment by Tim — September 14, 2015 @ 6:21 pm

            • Sure is odd, that a European census in 1933, the last year a total census was available, the total count of Jews in Europe was app. 15 million. In 1947, when the next census was taken, the Jews population had not went down, but UP! It was now app. 17 million. Ruffly figuring, if we take 6 million from 15 million we get 9 million. We count app. 1/2 as men, leaving us with 4 1/2 million. Then we take app. 1/2 of that for women who would or could bear children and we get 2 1/4 million.
              So, 2 1/4 million(which would be on the high side) over 13 years and these women would have to replace the 6 million, plus the additional deaths from other causes during this whole 14 year period. An estimated attrition rate could easily reach another 2 1/4 million over 14 years. This would then add another 2 1/4 million births in the efforts to reach the original 15 million pop. count. And finally we must add that additional 1 million to reach the new census count of 17 million. Totals would be 6m+2.25m+1m. What does that equal? 9.25 million, which for the times would be about right for a war ravaged area and people, even maybe a little high! (Which I tried to err on the positive.) Huum, I would say that someone is off by at least 5 million dead or non-existent Jews/Khazars.

              Simply put the numbers of 6 million were never there to begin with. And if one takes the position of o, then they open up a whole new can of worms, because that would mean the Germans NEVER ever killed all the people they claimed. Which would then mean there was never any Holocaust in the manner the Jews/Khazars made it out to be. Which then would make the statement of fact that ole Adolfu wasn’t personally responsible for all them deaths that you claim as 6 million.
              Nope you have dug yourself in a deep hole, just like you did by raping the German economy right before Adolfu came to power. Which, BTW was the reason he came to power!

              Now citing another source, the Red Cross finished a study in the mid 90s concerning the number of Jewish/Khazar victims of the so called Holocaust. This study took almost 10 years to complete. They searched and complied records from everywhere possible. Their final result was, officially, app. 282,000 Jews/Khazars perished during their so called Holocaust. If one goes back and redoes the numbers I started above, the new numbers will in fact work out close to the total census count of 1947, being app. 17 million Jews/Khazars.

              The only thing sacred about your Holocaust is your faked numbers.
              Wanna see what some of your rabbis had to say in making up those numbers, in quotes?

              Michael– Deo Vindicabamur
              Classical Historian Western Civilization

              Comment by Mike Lamb — October 29, 2015 @ 8:34 pm

  19. One can still get money for producing (more of) this stuff?

    Comment by Jett Rucker — June 23, 2015 @ 10:38 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: