Scrapbookpages Blog

October 11, 2015

Nazi gas chamber valve is a fake — don’t buy it!

Filed under: Dachau, Germany, Holocaust — Tags: — furtherglory @ 11:47 am
Nazi gas chamber valvue is up for auction

Nazi gas chamber valve is up for auction

Another photo of the valve allegedly used to put the gas into the gas chambers of the Holocaust

Another photo of the valve allegedly used to put the gas into the gas chambers of the Holocaust

The object in the two photos above appears to me to be a knob to turn the water on or off in a bathroom sink. I have two knobs exactly like this in the bathroom of my house that was built in 1938. The knobs are attached to a brass fixture exactly like the one in the photo, except that my fixture does not have a swastika carved into it.

Control room at Dachau where the gas was put into the gas chamber

Control room at Dachau where the gas was put into the gas chamber

A closeup of the panel in the center of the photo above shows that it has four push buttons, but the narrator of a film about Dachau did not explain what the buttons were for.

As seen today, there are four sets of lights in the Dachau gas chamber which might have been turned on and off by these buttons. However, in the film shown at the Nuremberg IMT, which was made by the American Army on May 3, 1945, four of the light fixture boxes are called “top vents” through which the gas was put into the room.

A display in the undressing room at Dachau in May 2007, the last time that I visited Dachau, informed visitors that all the push buttons had been stolen after the camp was liberated. The area behind the west wall of the gas chamber, which is shown in the photo above, is off limits to visitors now.

The Dachau gas chamber was described in Document No. 47 of the 79th Congress, 1st Session, Senate Report (May 15, 1945) of the Committee Requested by Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower to the Congress of the U.S. relative to Atrocities and other Conditions in Concentration Camps in Germany. This document, which is quoted below, was entered into the Nuremberg IMT  trial proceedings as IMT Document L-159.

Begin quote:

“The gas chamber was located in the center of a large room in the crematory building. It was built of concrete. Its dimensions were about 20 by 20 feet, and the ceiling was some 10 feet in height. In two opposite walls of the chamber were airtight doors through which condemned prisoners could be taken into the chamber for execution and removed after execution. The supply of gas into the chamber was controlled by means of two valves on one of the outer walls, and beneath the valves was a small glass-covered peephole through which the operator could watch the victims die. The gas was let into the chamber through pipes terminating in perforated brass fixtures set into the ceiling. The chamber was of size sufficient to execute probably a hundred men at one time.”

End quote

You can read about the Dachau gas chamber, as shown to tourists today on my website at http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/KZDachau/DachauLife01C.html

and at http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/GasChamber/history01.html

52 Comments »

  1. This has nothing to do with this post. I keep forgetting to ask. I heard someone say one time,”hitler signed his name to something one time. Anybody know what it was? I’m guessing it’s something that could’ve put his ass in a sling big time .

    Comment by Tim — October 16, 2015 @ 10:49 pm

  2. If you wanted to sell that on ebay.de, you’d have to scratch the swastika off first.

    Comment by eah — October 11, 2015 @ 1:24 pm

    • I have added another photo of the valve. I think that this is definitely a bathroom fixture.

      Comment by furtherglory — October 12, 2015 @ 10:16 am

  3. The SHOAH BUSINESS reached an ashaming level. But … maybe the customers targeted are neo nazis who want a nazi symbol even in their bathroom.

    Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 11, 2015 @ 12:49 pm

    • I think your assessment is correct, Wolf. Gives the neo-Nazis something to daydream about while they are sitting on the toilet.
      If that is the case then I hope the seller gets as much money as they can.

      Comment by HCW — October 11, 2015 @ 12:54 pm

    • I had to look up “neo nazi” on Wikipedia to find out what you are talking about. I found a list of neo-Nazis all over the world: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_neo-Nazi_organizations

      It would seem to me that a “neo-Nazi” would know that the gas was not liquid and that it could not have been turned on in the gas chambers with a bathroom fixture knob. No, the market for this object would be the True Believers crowd.

      Comment by furtherglory — October 11, 2015 @ 1:06 pm

      • You are giving the neo-Nazis too much credit. It has a swastika on it, that would send them into a feeding frenzy.

        Comment by HCW — October 11, 2015 @ 1:26 pm

      • If the gassing wasnt done with those control wheels etc….. then how are they explained?

        Comment by Greg — October 11, 2015 @ 6:36 pm

        • Not by something like what’s pictured above. Pipes were used for exhaust fumes, Zyclon B was lowered or tossed into the room.

          Comment by HCW — October 11, 2015 @ 7:17 pm

        • The gassing was done by the insertion of zyclon B infused pellets into hermetically sealed chambers . These pellets were then left for hours and the gas sublimated off ; this was often assisted by forced warm air ventilation. Objects like clothing were thereby cleaned of all disease vectors such as the common louse which transmitted the deadly typhus.
          The gassing of humans never occurred and is an allied myth which proved very useful post war in the demonisation of any western political group which sought to defend the interests of its own people as well as supporting the foundation and expansion of the Jewish state of Israel.
          It is to this day a very powerful myth supported by the mass media of the west and those who question it are liable for state punishment in most western European countries.

          Comment by peter — October 12, 2015 @ 1:09 am

          • The above explanation correctly explains how ZB was used to kill insects.
            However the Germans also used it to kill human beings at Birkenau. It takes less time and much lower concentrations to kill humans. Humans succumb at 300 PPM.
            Fred Leuchter, an alleged expert, did not realize that it takes a lower concentration of ZB to kill humans.
            http://www.nizkor.org/faqs/auschwitz/auschwitz-faq-06.html

            Comment by HCW — October 12, 2015 @ 7:11 am

            • Did you notice the date on the Nizkor page? Nizkor dates back to 1991. Nizkor is completely out of date and is not used as a source any more. Fred Leuchter is the one and only expert, in the world, on the subject of gas chambers.

              Comment by furtherglory — October 12, 2015 @ 8:28 am

              • It was known back in 1991 that Prussian blue is insoluble — it does not ‘weather away’.

                Comment by eah — October 12, 2015 @ 8:30 am

              • Considering that deniers still talk about Leuchter’s Report and that report is almost 30 years old I feel justified using Nizkor. The facts remain the same.

                Comment by HCW — October 12, 2015 @ 8:38 am

          • Excellent comment. I agree with you 100%.

            Comment by furtherglory — October 12, 2015 @ 8:21 am

          • From the nizkor link:

            Furthermore, the delousing chambers are intact while the extermination chambers were blown up (a .GIF picture of the one of Krema II is available). Therefore, their walls have been exposed to the elements for the last 50 years. The ruins of the gas chamber of Krema II are covered with about 3 feet of water during certain periods of the year; HCN compounds easily dissolve in these surroundings.

            Emphasis added — note especially “easily dissolve”.

            The ‘HCN compound’ of most interest is clearly Prussian blue — Prussian blue is one of the most stable compounds known, and absolutely insoluble:

            1. Prussian blue is extremely insoluble,…

            This info was posted here before (and not all that long ago).

            Keep posting nizkor links — they are no doubt very useful to revisionists.

            Following is a foto of the outside wall of a delousing chamber at Auschwitz-Birkenau — it has also been “exposed to the elements for the last 50 years”:

            Comment by eah — October 12, 2015 @ 8:29 am

            • So is Leuchter for real historians.
              The man did not know it takes less cyanide to kill humans than insects.
              Leuchter stated that he came up with his conclusions after studying source material, however, the Auschwitz curator denied that Leuchter received any materials from him. Leuchter never provided proof that he received any documents from the curator.
              Leuchter stated that he consulted with Du Pont regarding the chemistry of cyanide, however, Du Pont denied ever providing such materials regarding cyanide. Mr. Leuchter never provided proof that this relationship existed.
              He did not tell the company he used for chemical analysis what the samples were for, consequently the company incorrectly treated the samples, diluting the cyanide.

              I could go on but you get the picture.

              I’ve never understood why Leuchter was consulted in the first place. Arthur Butz is an engineer, so is Friedrich Berg. Butz is an associate professor at Northwestern, surely he would know a decent chemist. Why not send them to study the gas chambers at Birkenau?
              Maybe they were afraid of the truth.
              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Claude_Pressac

              Comment by HCW — October 12, 2015 @ 9:00 am

              • Leuchter is qualified only for single “lawfull execution” Gas Chambers of USA murder justice as he is dealing with execution instruments. He is not qualified – as not even updated – to express any opinion on mass murder Gas Chambers of the Nazis where Zyklon B had been employed. The Nazis had been able to keep secret about construction design and operating with Zyklon B; indeed no written design or operation manual had been found; likely there had been only oral instructions. Clearly persons involved had no interest in talking about the subject. Clear at last?

                Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 13, 2015 @ 9:19 am

                • Wolf, plans do exist for the Krema at Auschwitz and I believe there are manuals for the use of Zyclon B (only for use on insects).
                  Your comment on Leuchter and execution chambers for one person is correct. This is why I’ve always wondered why Zundel did not contact an engineer and a chemist to do their studies. The Poles did their own studies after the Leuchter report which refute his findings.

                  Comment by HCW — October 13, 2015 @ 9:40 am

                • HCW: “This is why I’ve always wondered why Zundel did not contact an engineer and a chemist to do their studies.”

                  Probably for the very same reason why US prisons used to call Leuchter to build their execution gas chambers…

                  HCW: “The Poles did their own studies after the Leuchter report which refute his findings.”

                  The Poles first did their own studies which confirmed his findings. And they later did another ‘study’ by excluding the most stable cyanide compounds (ferro-cyanides) from their analysis. Very logical for a ‘study’ done 5 decades after the events. Biased science at its best. Perfect for the biased history which we’re fed with every day…

                  Comment by hermie — October 16, 2015 @ 8:51 am

              • HCW: “So is Leuchter for real historians.”

                You mean historians like Raul Hilberg and his lethal Diesel fumes?? Don’t make me laugh…

                HCW: “The man did not know it takes less cyanide to kill humans than insects.”

                In fact, it doesn’t take less cyanide to kill humans within a few minutes than insects within several hours. Or perhaps the witnesses who mentioned such short killing times for homicidal gassings were lying, is that what one should conclude? What else?😉

                Comment by hermie — October 15, 2015 @ 8:00 am

                • Leuchter makes me laugh.

                  Again, Butz and Berg are engineers. Butz is an associate professor at a prestigious University. Why were they not consulted? I’m assuming Zundel would know who they are and their biographies. Berg led a protest against the showing of the miniseries “Holocaust” and Butz wrote “The Hoax of the Twentieth Century.” The denier community, at least those with prestige, is not a large one. Why not consult an engineer? They could adequately explain what is showing on blue prints, what the set up of the structures means, etc.

                  Comment by HCW — October 15, 2015 @ 11:28 am

                • Fred Leuchter has a degree in History, not a degree in gas chamber engineering. So obviously, he knows nothing. He should never have been hired by the State of Missouri, which has a gas chamber in Jefferson City. They should have hired a person with a degree in gas chamber engineering as a consultant, not a person with a degree in History.

                  Comment by furtherglory — October 15, 2015 @ 11:59 am

                • I also have a degree in history. Would you trust me to build a gas chamber?

                  Comment by HCW — October 15, 2015 @ 12:38 pm

                • fg: “They should have hired a person with a degree in gas chamber engineering as a consultant”

                  Does such a thing as a degree in gas chamber engineering even exist?

                  Leuchter’s job as a builder of gas chambers for US jails is a degree more valid than any engineering degree on that topic. Claiming that Leuchter knows nothing about gas chambers amounts to claiming that the best baker in America knows nothing about bread because he’s a self-made man who learned his job through years of practice instead of years of learning in a bakery school. Had there been a guy more knowledgeable about gas chambers than Leuchter in America, be sure that man would have been hired by US jails for executions and by the Zionist lobby for the refutation of Leuchter’s findings. As that never happened, one must conclude that such an expert is nowhere to be found.

                  Comment by hermie — October 16, 2015 @ 9:10 am

                • The problem with Leuchter is that he wasn’t building one, he was examining the destroyed structure the Nazis built in the 1940’s. If Leuchter actually built gas chambers which I actually doubt. Who is more qualified to examine a structure built to kill thousands, an engineer, architect or a self styled expert who dealt with execution chambers built to accommodate one person? Who is more qualified to deal with chemical analysis, an actual chemist or a self styled expert?

                  Comment by HCW — October 16, 2015 @ 2:26 pm

                • HCW: “Who is more qualified to examine a structure built to kill thousands, an engineer, architect or a self styled expert who dealt with execution chambers built to accommodate one person?”

                  I’d respond: Number 3, as I fail to see how an engineer building let’s say bridges or an architect building let’s say villas could be of any help in this matter.

                  Even if toxicologists specialized in gas poisonings and chemists specialized on cyanide would be very helpful too, that’s certain. I’m still wondering what the Zionist lobby is waiting for before sending the best toxicologists and chemists of the world to Auschwitz, Treblinka, Majdanek, and other places in order to crush Holocaust revisionists with scientific studies supporting their views and interests.

                  HCW: “Who is more qualified to deal with chemical analysis, an actual chemist or a self styled expert?”

                  A guy with a history degree, who patently slept too often during his science lessons at school, maybe?😉

                  Comment by hermie — October 16, 2015 @ 7:45 pm

                • I was actually quite good at science, Hermie. It was the math that got me.
                  You must be talking about Fred Leuchter.

                  Comment by HCW — October 16, 2015 @ 10:28 pm

                • It’s kinda hard to study a gas chamber that the Nazis destroyed at Treblinka.
                  The same with Birkenau.
                  Studies have been done, however.
                  http://holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/pressac/technique-and-operation/pressac0011.shtml
                  http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/holes-report/holes.shtml
                  http://www.holocaust-history.org/irving-david/vanpelt/

                  Comment by HCW — October 16, 2015 @ 10:43 pm

                • HCW: “It’s kinda hard to study a gas chamber that the Nazis destroyed at Treblinka.”

                  It’s hard to make ruins talk in general, but archeologists do it every day nevertheless.

                  But I concede it’s much easier to cry like a spoiled child after finding a tile with a Star of David on it and to be ridiculed after realizing it’s in fact a heraldic mullet star.

                  http://newobserveronline.com/smithsonian-red-faced-after-treblinka-star-of-david-tiles-shown-to-be-not-jewish-at-all/

                  HCW: “The same with Birkenau.”

                  Any archeologist in the world would be very happy to have ruins so well preserved at his disposal as the ones of Krema II and Krema III at Birkenau. What kind of history degree do you have?

                  HCW: “Studies have been done, however.”

                  The ridiculous cracks found by Keren, McCarthy and Mazal were so ridiculous and embarrassing that even Robert Van Pelt was finally reduced to come up with his funny story of Zyklon holes resealed by the Germans afterwards.

                  I was sure that you would bring Pressac. Hilarious to see Holocaustians rely with an unwavering faith on a pharmacian like Pressac and work very hard to ridicule an expert on execution gas chambers like Leuchter. As far as I’m concerned, I’ll look for Pressac’s expertise when someone claims that the Nazis used aspirin as a weapon of mass murder. Until that day, I’ll rather trust Leuchter.😉

                  Comment by hermie — October 17, 2015 @ 7:05 am

            • I wrote about the disinfection chambers on my website at http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/Tour/Birkenau/DisinfectionBuilding.html

              The guided tours at Auschwitz-Birkenau do not go to the buildings shown on my website. It is my understanding that tourists are now required to be on a tour, and are not allowed to run around by themselves, taking photos, as I did. Seeing these buildings causes tourists to become Holocaust deniers. This puts them in danger of being sent to prison in 19 countries.

              You can see photos of Germar Rudolf standing inside one of the rooms where clothes were disinfected. The blue stains are very obvious. Germar spent 14 years in prison as a result of going inside these buildings, which caused him to become a denier. Let this be a warning to all you people.

              Comment by furtherglory — October 12, 2015 @ 10:37 am

              • And yet Pressac went from denial to understanding the truth.
                Again, why blow up morgues or delousing buildings?
                If the Soviets left gassing facilities standing at Majdanek for propaganda purposes, why blow them up at Birkenau?
                Gemar Rudolph broke the law and was sent to prison. The lesson to be learned? Don’t break the law. If you espous Holocaust Denial then go to a country where it isn’t illegal and spout off.

                Comment by HCW — October 12, 2015 @ 11:06 am

                • Germar was living in America where Holocaust denial was not against the law. He was RENDITIONED to Germany for trial. I wrote about this at https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2012/05/11/new-book-by-germar-rudolf-resistance-is-obligatory/

                  Comment by furtherglory — October 12, 2015 @ 11:29 am

                • Sorry, not aware that he was extradited to Germany.
                  Extradition treaties do take precedence if someone is wanted in another country.

                  If it helps I do disagree with Holocaust Denial being illegal. Frankly all it does is provide publicity for those who espous this sort of thing. Better to let them howl in the wind.

                  Comment by HCW — October 12, 2015 @ 11:40 am

                • I wrote about the blowing up of gas chambers on this blog post: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2010/12/20/why-did-the-ss-leave-a-gas-chamber-for-the-american-liberators-to-find-at-dachau/

                  I believe that the Russians blew up the gas chambers at Birkenau so that they could claim that they were gas chambers and not morgues. I believe that the gas chambers at Birkenau were morgues where the bodies were stored before they were burned, a few at a time. Why would anyone put gas chambers in the buildings where bodies were burned? Where did they store the bodies after they were gassed?

                  I wrote about this on this blog post: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2015/07/04/

                  Comment by furtherglory — October 12, 2015 @ 11:41 am

                • But, you have no proof that the Soviets blew up the buildings, this is your opinion. Nothing wrong with that, however, an opinion is not proof. You also did not address Majdanek.

                  Comment by HCW — October 12, 2015 @ 11:45 am

                • I blogged about the Majdanek gas chambers at https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/mietek-grocher-the-man-who-walked-backwards-out-of-a-gas-chamber-and-survived/

                  The number of Jewish deaths at Majdanek has been reduced to 59,000. The number of gas chambers had to be reduced because of this.

                  The claim that the Germans blew up the gas chambers at Birkenau is also an opinion with no proof. Why would they have done this?

                  Comment by furtherglory — October 12, 2015 @ 11:58 am

                • Well, let’s look at this logically.

                  We are going to start with facts:
                  Someone blew up the Krema. That’s indisputable.

                  So, who benefits?

                  While it is possible that the Soviets did it, how does this benefit them?
                  Remember, they rebuilt Krema I. They also left the gas chambers standing at Majdanek. The gas chambers make an excellent propaganda tool directing focus on the Germans. Standing Krema in Auschwitz, whatever their purpose, constitute another excellent propaganda tool. If they are just morgues and crematorium then the Soviets can modify them however they want to tell whatever narrative they desire. Imagine the impact of such modified structures for the world press.

                  Now, for the Germans:
                  If these structures were used to kill hundreds of thousands of Jews than it is in their best interest to destroy these structures as soon as possible to prevent evidence of that crime from being broadcast. This is my viewpoint. On the other hand Hermie, Vincent Reynaud and Robert Faurrison believe the Germans blew up these structures to prevent them from being used as propaganda tools for the Soviets.

                  Now, we also have eyewitness testimony that says the Germans blew them up. I’m not going to go into that because any mention of eyewitness testimony sends Hermie into a psychotic rant. I thought I’d spare you, me and Hermie that pain.

                  Comment by HCW — October 12, 2015 @ 3:59 pm

                • I wrote about the eye-witness testimony given by Filip Müller on this blog post: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/the-gas-chambers-at-auschwitz-birkenau/

                  Comment by furtherglory — October 13, 2015 @ 6:48 am

                • HCW: “Again, why blow up morgues or delousing buildings?”

                  That one has already been answered on several occasions. If you don’t like the answer, please provide us with a logical and strong refutation of t instead of repeating your question ad nauseam.

                  Comment by hermie — October 12, 2015 @ 7:58 pm

                • HCW: “any mention of eyewitness testimony sends Hermie into a psychotic rant. I thought I’d spare you, me and Hermie that pain.”

                  No psychotic rant. Basic logic. That’s probably the reason why you have finally conceded the non-probative value of testimonies.😉

                  In this vein, the testimonies of Black soldiers about the capture of concentration camps at Dachau and Buchenwald are useless for historical research (especially when there are documentary records showing that their units were nowhere around Dachau and Buchenwald at the moment of their capture by U.S. troops), expect maybe for someone wanting to demonstrate the laughable nature of testimonial ‘evidence’. Such testimonies are only good for another bamboozlement of Gentiles by Spielberg…

                  Comment by hermie — October 12, 2015 @ 8:17 pm

              • I was replying to FG, not you, he asked the question.
                Read the comments and catch up, you are the late one to the conversation.

                Comment by HCW — October 12, 2015 @ 8:08 pm

                • HCW: “I was replying to FG, not you, he asked the question.”

                  But you referred to me.

                  Don’t worry. I had perfectly understood your point.

                  HCW: “Read the comments and catch up, you are the late one to the conversation.”

                  Probably the best refutation of the argument in my previous comment…😉

                  Comment by hermie — October 15, 2015 @ 7:51 am

              • Why would they have done this?

                Why did the Germans blow up — or try to blow up: with 6-8m thick reinforced concrete roofs and walls it wasn’t easy, or all that successful — the abandoned, empty bunkers at Hitler’s HQ Wolfsschanze? Were there gas chambers there too? Why did they do the same to the Tannenberg-Denkmal? Must have been a crime scene. Etc — surely many such examples could be found. As usual re the ‘Holocaust’, when there are more or less equally plausible explanations for something, those who believe the conventional ‘Holocaust’ story invariably grasp at the most sinister possible interpretation of events, evidence or not.

                Why the Germans Destroyed the Crematoria but left the “Gas Chambers” Intact

                However, a review of German destruction of the “evidence” at Auschwitz/Birkenau shows that, first of all, the Germans left a mass of documentary evidence untouched; including the complete record of the construction…of the so-called gas chambers…The two most important gas chambers of the entire Holocaust Myth are Leichenkeller 1 of Krema II and Leichenkeller 1 of Krema III. Leichenkeller 1 of Krema II was/is almost entirely complete, with its floor and walls untouched. The roof consisting of two layers of waterproofing and a thick concrete slab roof have partially fallen into the room below. About 35% of the room is still easily accessible. Leichenkeller 1 of Krema III was also left in a highly “inspectable” state, but with its roof completely dropped…On the other hand, the crematoria sections of Krema II and III have been demolished down to the floor of the second level. All traces of crematorium have been removed except for the rail tracks. Even the chimneys have been reduced to scattered bricks…

                The Germans were not destroying evidence of gas chambers but were destroying evidence of crematoria. Why?

                Majdanek or, to be precise, the propaganda use that the Majdanek crematoria “ovens” were put to by the Soviets after their capture July 24, 1944. Majdanek Camp was captured complete, without any dismantling of its facilities…The Soviets and Allies, then, made major propaganda use of the crematorium ovens or “gas ovens” as they were sometimes called then. What is most likely to have happened next was that an order went out “from Berlin” in late September or October saying in effect: “Avoid leaving evidence of crematorium.”

                Comment by eah — October 13, 2015 @ 2:15 am

                • The alleged order sounds like guesswork, the one claimed to have ordered the destruction of the Krema.

                  “What is most likely to have happened next….”

                  Please. If I tried that you would scream to high heaven about it.

                  If that is what allegedly happened then the SS took their sweet time about it if the alleged order came out in September or October. The Sondercommandos destroyed one of the Krema in October during their insurrection, the others remained intact until before the Germans left.

                  Comment by HCW — October 13, 2015 @ 8:04 am

                • eah: The destruction had time problems due to the nearing of Red Army. The SS often did not manage to destruct all in time before having to run away; so something had been left.

                  Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 13, 2015 @ 11:00 am

          • These pellets were then left for hours and the gas sublimated off ;

            And re the alleged gassing of people, it is never acknowledged that all the gas contained in the pellets could never have sublimated away in the average time claimed for a gassing. This means the pellets would still have been actively sublimating extremely deadly HCN gas when the doors to the alleged gas chambers were supposed to have been opened — ventilating the room would not have been enough. And I have never heard where a member of the so-called ‘Sonderkommando’ said they used gas masks to enter the gas chamber. And in any case, a gas mask alone would not have been enough — any skin exposure at all would allow the gas to enter the body.

            Comment by eah — October 12, 2015 @ 8:45 am

            • GAS MASKS:
              Extract from FG https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2011/10/15/eye-witness-description-of-the-procedure-used-in-the-auschwitz-birkenau-gas-chambers/

              The ventilators, patented “Exhator” system, quickly evacuated the gas from the room, but in the crannies between the dead and the cracks of the doors, small pockets of it still remained. Even two hours later it caused a suffocating cough. For that reason the Sonderkommando group which first moved into the room was equipped with gas masks. Once again the room was powerfully lighted, revealing a horrible spectacle. […]

              The Sonderkommando squad, outfitted with large rubber boots, lined up around the hill of bodies and flooded it with powerful jets of water.

              Comment by Herbert Stolpmann — October 12, 2015 @ 10:01 pm

              • Thanks for quoting this. I had forgotten about writing this on my blog.

                Comment by furtherglory — October 13, 2015 @ 6:33 am

              • H. Stolpmann: “The ventilators, patented “Exhator” system, quickly evacuated the gas from the room, but in the crannies between the dead and the cracks of the doors, small pockets of it still remained.”

                As the ventilation of those rooms was upside down (for homicidal gas chambers, not for morgues) and so very ineffective, I doubt that “the ventilators quickly evacuated the gas from the room”. In the morgues/’gas chambers’ of Krema II and Krema III, the air was pumped out at the bottom and pumped in at the top of those rooms. No need to be a university teacher to see that, with a light gas such as HCN, heavier fresh air just pumped in would have been pumped out continually while light poisonous HCN would have remained in the upper part of those rooms. Basic fact about the distribution of gases according to their respective densities.

                H. Stolpmann: ” For that reason the Sonderkommando group which first moved into the room was equipped with gas masks.”

                Doesn’t save the orthodox narrative, as the use of special gas masks for HCN forbade any heavy physical exertion like dragging thousands of dead bodies out of a room. Any violation of that rule would have caused a very fast breaking (saturation) of the fragile filters in those gas masks and a certain death for all the infringers. When they fumigated buildings, the German guys with anti-HCN special gas masks on their face were instructed to move slowly (in order to avoid any physical exertion too heavy) and to go out and breathe fresh air for a few minutes after collecting the pellets of zyklon B and opening the windows on each floor.

                Comment by hermie — October 16, 2015 @ 8:20 pm

                • hermie: “to go out and breathe fresh air for a few minutes after collecting the pellets of zyklon B and opening the windows on each floor.”

                  Unclear. I meant that the German fumigators were ordered to go out and breathe fresh air after collecting the pellets of Zyklon B and opening the windows on a level and that they performed the same operation on the next level only after that breathing break.

                  Comment by hermie — October 16, 2015 @ 8:27 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: