Scrapbookpages Blog

October 24, 2015

If you could go back in time, would you kill baby Hitler?

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust — Tags: , , — furtherglory @ 9:35 am

A news article which you can read in full here, tells about a Twitter question which asked readers: If you could go back in time, would you kill baby Hitler.  40% of those, who answered the question, said “Yes”.

The implication is that if Hiter had not been allowed to grow up, the Jews would not have been killed in the Holocaust.

Little Baby Hitler

Little Baby Hitler

Hitler's birthplace has a stone monument from Mauthausen casmp

Hitler’s birthplace is marked by a stone monument from Mauthausen concentration camp

Another view of the stone in front of Hitler's birthplace

Another view of the stone in front of Hitler’s birthplace

I wrote about Hitler on this previous blog post:

In my humble opinion, killing baby Hitler would not have saved the Jews. The Jews have been expelled from literally every country in the world, from the beginning of time.   You can read the full list of expulsions at

If not Hitler, someone else would have Holocausted the Jews.

This article explains it:

Choir loft and organ in Parish Church of St. Stephan in Braunau am Inn, Austria

Choir loft and organ in Parish Church of St. Stephan in Braunau am Inn, Austria

I took the photo above in the Catholic parish church in the town of Braunau am Inn, which Hitler attended as a child.

Why have the Jews been kicked out of every country in the world, except the USA, since the beginning of time? I will let the readers of my blog explain it.

On my website, I wrote about the Jews being killed in the city of Rothenburg ob der Tauber in the year 1298:

For some strange reason, Jews have been persecuted, all over the world, for 800 years.  You can’t blame baby Hitler for this.


  1. Kill him,don’t kill him. There would’ve just been someone else. What about if Papa Joe was never born. Probably would’ve been someone else to kill the millions of Ruskies. Carlos Lehder. He was second only to Pablo Escobar in the cocaine world. Carlos father was a Nazi sympathizer. Carlos admired hitler. At the height of his power on the cocaine trade,Carlos was wanting to form a socialist party in Columbia. Patterned after hitlers nazi Germany. Who would Carlos have had bumped off? I should say, what ethnic group of people.

    Comment by Tim — October 28, 2015 @ 10:24 pm

  2. Anybody thinking of going on a pilgrimage to the sites of Nazi brutality in Austria and Southern Germany should be aware that the queue at border control is a nightmare these days !

    Comment by peter — October 25, 2015 @ 2:32 am

  3. “If you could go back in time, would you kill baby Hitler?”

    No, I wouldn’t. I’d rather advise him to cremate the entire British army at Dunkirk at all costs. And I would also advise him to develop nuclear V2-rockets from 1933 in order to be able to stun the British, American and Soviet Golems of World Jewry when (not if, when) needed.

    Comment by hermie — October 24, 2015 @ 9:05 pm

    • Herr Hermie! As Hitler in 1933 got rid of many scientists, or Jews or considered of Jewish race, so he could not develop nuclear energy and arms in time before being defeated. He let the British army at Dunquerk to leave in an attempt to reach an agreement with Great Britain.You ought to study history.

      Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 25, 2015 @ 1:12 am

      • wolf: “Herr Hermie! As Hitler in 1933 got rid of many scientists, or Jews or considered of Jewish race, so he could not develop nuclear energy and arms in time before being defeated.”

        Yeah, I already knew this song. Aryans are too stupid to conceive and design nuclear bombs by themselves. Only Superior Jews could do that. If Hitler believed dumb Aryans could have invented atomic bombs without Chosenites guiding them, he was insane. Blah blah blah. Come on. Hitler dropped any German nuclear program because he thought such weapons would be ready years after the end of the war. Had Germany had a nuclear program, the 3rd Reich would have had operational nuclear bombs years before the Jewish donkeys of America came with their Manhattan firecrack.

        wolf: “He let the British army at Dunquerk to leave in an attempt to reach an agreement with Great Britain.You ought to study history.”

        Another historical distortion by the victors of WW2. You ought to stop believing in every word told by compulsive liars such as Anglo-Americans.

        The Dunkirk pause was an idea of Kleist and Rundstedt, not Hitler, and the impetus for it was not magnanimity or romantic hopes of peace with Britain.

        By 20 May 1940, when Guderian’s tanks reached the sea at Abbeville and closed the trap on the British troops at Dunkirk, Generalfeldmarschall von Kleist asked Generalfeldmarschall von Rundstedt for a pause while the armoured units recovered and the infantry caught up, and Rundstedt agreed to that. At the same time, Göring attempted to persuade Hitler that the Luftwaffe could destroy the trapped Allied armies, freeing the German forces to turn south towards Paris. Hitler accepted that view, and on 24 May issued his famous “Halt Order”. After the war, Rundstedt described the Halt Order as “an incredible blunder” and assigned full blame to Hitler (, but Rundstedt’s biographer conceded that this “does not represent the whole truth”, because the original impetus for a pause at Dunkirk had in fact come from Kleist and Rundstedt himself.

        Comment by hermie — October 25, 2015 @ 9:55 am

        • Herr Hermie! And I know also the song about arms developped by Nazi scientists and techincians who after war end got positions suitable to their professional experiences mainly in USA; sone had been hired by Egypt Nasser Regime.
          Furthermore, interesting what You say about the reason of the Dunkirque halt. It seems therefore that Hitler looked for the heavies destruction way of British cities, so the revenge came as Berling, Hamburg and other German cities came under bombing. The official history taucht that Hitler wanted to reach a truce and peace with UK. Later, in October 1940 he tried to reach a treaty with Vichy France and met twice Petain.
          Instead of mocking me seat down and study better the history of WWI and WWII.

          Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 26, 2015 @ 2:46 am

          • wolf: “It seems therefore that Hitler looked for the heavies destruction way of British cities, so the revenge came as Berling, Hamburg and other German cities came under bombing.”

            Nice example of the biased conclusions drawn by partial minds.

            How does a realization that the fast neutralization of the British armies was needed, show that Hitler wanted to bomb British cities? Nonsensical, as the neutralization of Britain’s armies at Dunkirk would have stopped WW2 and so also the bombings on cities.

            Hitler was very reluctant to bomb British cities, and the German bombings on British cities came as a retaliation against Churchill’s intensive bombings on German cities, not the other way round as claimed by yourself. That was Churchill’s method to have his hands free for the aerial obliteration of Germany he wanted to perpetrate.

            Any discussion with you increases my conviction that Aryans can definitely not live with the gang of compulsive distorters and liars called “the Jewish people” among themselves.

            Comment by hermie — October 26, 2015 @ 4:59 am

            • Herr Hermie! Bombing of British Cities started in Summer 1940 while the British one on German towns only in the autumn. The LUFTWAFFE in first time had been more efficient than the RAF having Nazi Germany prepared for war along the years while Labour party opposed programs to enhance armed forces.

              Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 26, 2015 @ 10:10 am

              • wolf: “Bombing of British Cities started in Summer 1940 while the British one on German towns only in the autumn.”


                The attacks by the Royal Air Force (RAF) on German cities began with the attack on Wilhelmshaven on 5 September 1939. Churchill took office on 10 May 1940 and the first bombing deliberately targetting civilians during WW2 was the British one on the residential areas of Mönchengladbach-Rheydt on 11 May 1940. And from then on made such attacks on cities inthe Ruhr area night after night. The first carpet bombing of a German city was in the night from 15 to 16 May 1940 in Duisburg. After that the RAF committed repeated air attacks on German cities. On 6/7 September 1940, a German air raid on London took place – but specifically on military targets such as ports, railway stations, war factories and power stations. Crews were expressly prohibitted to drop their bombs on residential areas because thereby “no war deciding success could be reached.”

                ‘It may be Inconvenient History but England rather than Germany initiated the murderous slaughter of bombing civilians thus bringing about retaliation. Chamberlain conceded that it was “absolutely contrary to International law.” It began in 1940 and Churchill believed it held the secret of victory. He was convinced that raids of sufficient intensity could destroy Germany’s morale, and so his War Cabinet planned a campaign that abandoned the accepted practice of attacking the enemy’s armed forces and, instead made civilians the primary target. Night after night, RAF bombers in ever increasing numbers struck throughout Germany, usually at working class housing, because it was more densely packed.’ The Peoples’ War, Angus Calder. London, Jonathan Cape, 1969.

                ‘Hitler only undertook the bombing of British civilian targets reluctantly three months after the RAF had commenced bombing German civilian targets. Hitler would have been willing at any time to stop the slaughter. Hitler was genuinely anxious to reach with Britain an agreement confining the action of aircraft to battle zones… Retaliation was certain if we carried the war into Germany… there was a reasonable possibility that our capital and industrial centres would not have been attacked if we had continued to refrain from attacking those of Germany… We began to bomb objectives on the German mainland before the Germans began to bomb objectives on the British mainland… Because we were doubtful about the psychological effect of propagandist distortion of the truth that it was we who started the strategic bombing offensive, we have shrunk from giving our great decision of May 11th, 1940, the publicity it deserves.’ J.M. Spaight, CB, CBE, Principal Secretary to the Air Ministry, Bombing Vindicated.

                ‘The attack on the Ruhr was therefore an informal invitation to the Luftwaffe to bomb London. The primary purpose of these raids was to goad the Germans into undertaking reprisal raids of a similar character on Britain. Such raids would arouse intense indignation in Britain against Germany and so create a war psychosis without which it would be impossible to carry on a modern war.’ The Royal Air Force, 1939-1945, The Fight at Odds, p. 122. Dennis Richards, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

                ‘The inhabitants of Coventry, for example, continued to imagine that their sufferings were due to the innate villainy of Adolf Hitler without a suspicion that a decision, splendid or otherwise, of the British War Cabinet, was the decisive factor in the case.’ F.J.P. Veale, Advance to Barbarism, p. 169.

                ‘I am in full agreement [with terror bombing]. I am all for the bombing of working class areas in German cities. I am a Cromwellian – I believe in “slaying in the name of the Lord!”‘ Sir Archibald Sinclair, Secretary for Air.

                ‘One of the most unhealthy features of the bombing offensive was that the War Cabinet – and in particular the Secretary for Air, Archibald Sinclair (now Lord Thurso), felt it necessary to repudiate publicly the orders which they themselves had given to Bomber Command.’ R.H.S. Crossman, MP, Labour Minister of Housing. Sunday Telegraph, 1 October 1961.

                ‘They [the British Air Chiefs] argued that the desired result, of reducing German industrial production, would be more readily achieved if the homes of the workers in the factories were destroyed; if the workers were kept busy arranging for the burial of their wives and children, output might reasonably be expected to fall… It was concentrated on working class houses because, as Professor Lindemann maintained, a higher percentage of bloodshed per ton of explosives dropped could be expected from bombing houses built close together, rather than by bombing higher class houses surrounded by gardens.’ Advance to Barbarism, F.J.P. Veale.

                Comment by hermie — October 26, 2015 @ 8:24 pm

                • Wilhelmshaven was a legitimate military target, it was a German naval base.
                  Technically Germany targeted civilian targets first:
                  I actually agree with you about Dunkirk, however I disagree that the destruction of the British meant a German victory in WW2. Germany lacked the ability to invade Britain.

                  Comment by HCW — October 28, 2015 @ 6:33 pm

                • HCW: “Wilhelmshaven was a legitimate military target, it was a German naval base.”

                  I didn’t say that Wilhelmshaven was not a legitimate target. I was just answering wolfie’s bamboozlement about the Germans allegedly bombing British cities before any British bomb had fallen on German cities. Wolfie realized his tricks don’t work on me. That’s why he just ran away as usually.

                  HCW: “Technically Germany targeted civilian targets first:

                  The topic is the Germano-British aerial bombing war, not the Germano-Polish war.

                  HCW: “I actually agree with you about Dunkirk, however I disagree that the destruction of the British meant a German victory in WW2. Germany lacked the ability to invade Britain.”

                  With the British & French armies K.O. and out of the picture, an invasion of Britain would have looked like a pleasure trip. Germany lacked the ability to invade (even if I believe that Germany rather lacked the will to invade Britain) only with Britain able to defend herself, what an armyless Britain would of course have been unable to do efficiently. That’s obvious.

                  Comment by hermie — October 30, 2015 @ 9:41 am

                • The eradication of the British army at Dunkirk would not have changed the fact that the German navy lacked the ability to protect a military invasion. The German Navy lost a great many of its capitol ships during the invasion of Norway.
                  The RAF also remained a substantial obstacle to overcome, especially with Harris’s decision not to send anymore fighters to France.
                  I will concede that the loss of the British army would have seriously damaged British morale, however, I think Churchill was still determined to fight on.

                  Comment by HCW — November 2, 2015 @ 12:27 pm

  4. Expulsions of Jews have been ordered within the US. None other than US General and future president Ulysses S. Grant ordered Jews expelled from a sector of Kentucky during the War between the States at a time when Grant was conducting operations in that sector and he found the trafficking activities of Jews in what he considered contraband hindersome to the progress of his campaign.

    This order may not have been much, if at all, carried out, but knowledge of the order led Jews to oppose his subsequent candidacy for president. Any candidate with such opprobrium hanging over his head today wouldn’t even make it to the primaries. Things have changed since 1863.

    Comment by Jett Rucker — October 24, 2015 @ 12:30 pm

  5. The Jews do not believe that the goyim are human. You can read about it at

    Comment by furtherglory — October 24, 2015 @ 10:40 am

    • Furtherglory! You are simply wrong. I repeat; Your stupid classmate came from a crazy ignorant family,

      Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 24, 2015 @ 12:37 pm

  6. Would I kill him given the chance? No. You get what you deserve in life and the jews have had plenty of what they deserve through history. The difference is they never learn and never change their behaviour.

    Comment by Ian Burgess — October 24, 2015 @ 10:04 am

    • FURTHERGLORY. The Hitler family at Linz at that time had a Jewish doctor and in 1940 the Vienna Gestapo ordered to handle in a preferential way the emigration of Dr. Bloch. So, refering to Himmler Posen speech, Hitler too had his prefered first class Jews; beside Dr Bloch he cared also his front officer of WWI times. it seems that among the Nazi bosses only Himler and Rosenberg had no prefered first class Jew.
      Furthermore, extermination of babies had been a Nazi – not a Jewish – custom. In Israel hospitals many Sirians and even relatives of Hamas comanders receive medical cares. In Middle Age some Pope relied on Jewish physicians.
      As I have shown several times, Nazism had been the product of decades long hatred sprayed enjoing free speech. According Nazi program the Jews had to be exterminated by mass murder – Gas Chambers, Mass Executions, etc – while Poles and Russians had to destructed by enslavering and forced labor.

      Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 24, 2015 @ 10:41 am

      • I am familiar with the official Holocaust story, which you can read on Wikipedia at

        Wikipedia does not explain WHY the Jews were killed, nor why the Jews had been hated, all over the world, since the beginning of time.

        Wikipedia has a photo of a woman and her baby being sent to the right by an SS officer at Auschwitz-Birkenau. I have this same photo on this page of my website:

        According to the Holocaust official story, Jews were sent to the LEFT to be gassed. This woman and her baby are being sent to the RIGHT. Very odd!

        Comment by furtherglory — October 24, 2015 @ 10:52 am

        • Furtherglory: 1. Every ethnical or religious minority is considered a precious scapegoat for diverting popular fury. As to the Jews, many dominators in the centuries blamed them for the strict Monotheism which did not suit to deification of the ruler. 2. Wkipedia is usefull but in now way the Holy Bible. Clear? 3. That woman had been sent right because she and/or her baby seemed suitable for medical experiments.

          Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 24, 2015 @ 12:45 pm

          • Furtherglory; 4. In history along the centuries Christian rulers expelled the Jews after having first overtaxed them and then to get all their remanining assets. And so occured also with other religious or ethnic minorities I hope to have still the force and health to work out a summary of those robbery stile exoulsions in the centuries. 5. The Founding Fathers of USA had been English Puritans whom King James I wanted to get rid of. while those of Austrailia too had been poor people His Majesty wanted to get rid of. So in USA as elsewhere studying and theaching of history should be improved.

            Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 25, 2015 @ 1:26 am

    • And you deserve to go to the deepest hell.

      Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 24, 2015 @ 10:42 am

      • My above message had been adressed to Ian Burgess who wellcomes mass murder of Jews and regrets my survival.

        Comment by Wolf MURNELSTEIN — October 24, 2015 @ 10:44 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: