Scrapbookpages Blog

November 3, 2015

90-year-old former Auschwitz guard will not face charges for stuffing 15 prisoners at a time into a standing cell

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust — Tags: , , , — furtherglory @ 9:38 am
My 1998 photo of a reconstructed standing cell at Auscwitz I camp

My 1998 photo of a reconstructed standing cell at  the Auscwitz main camp

The reconstructed door, which is shown in the photo above, opens into Cell #2; there is another cell to the right of the door, which you can see in the photo.

Each Stehzelle (standing cell) was used for third degree punishment, which consisted of 3 days in a dark cell without room to lie down or sit. The standing cells were about the size of a phone booth and had no windows.

To the left in the picture above, you can see the edge of the door into Cell #1 on the left, which gives you an idea of how small these cells were. Imagine the problem of removing 15 dead bodies from one of these cells!

In fact, how did Gisela manage to get 15 people at one time into one of these cells?  Could it be that the RECONSTRUCTED  cells, which I photographed in 1998, are a bit smaller than the original cells?

After Arthur Liebehenschel replaced Rudolf Hoess as the camp commandant at Auschwitz on December 1, 1943, he ordered the standing cells to be torn down. The standing cells have been only partially reconstructed, just as the gas chamber in the main Auschwitz camp was only partially reconstructed.

The following quote is from a news article that you can read in full here:

At Auschwitz she [Gisela S.] was a harsh disciplinarian who beat prisoners and who was often in charge of the standing cells – small, dark rooms where up to 15 people at a time were crammed in for minor rule infractions. It was not uncommon to leave people in these rooms for days on end, causing the death of some or all of those confined.

It was judged that she was mentally incompetent to face justice.

My 1998 photograph above shows the reconstructed entrance to one of the 4 standing cells (Stehzellen) in prison cell #22 in the basement of Block 11 in the main Auschwitz camp. These 4 cells were 31.5 inches square; there was no light coming in at all, and no heating or cooling system.

Prisoners had to crawl into the cell through a tiny door, as shown in the photo above. Metal bars at the entrance allowed guards to open the door and look inside the cell. There was no room to lie down or sit down in the cell; prisoners had to stand up. The floors of these cells were covered with excrement left by the occupants.

Prisoners who were being punished were put into these cells at night, and in the morning taken out to perform a full 10-hour day of work. This punishment was usually given to prisoners who had tried to sabotage the work done in the factories at Auschwitz III (Monowitz).

Standing cell with wall cut away so visitors can see inside

My 1998 photo of a standing cell with the wall cut away so visitors can see inside

An airhole on the outside of Block 11 let in air for the prisoners

An airhole on the outside of Block 11 let in air for the prisoners

The photograph above shows a window with bars on it, on the outside wall of Block 11, and just below the window, there is a small black metal box which looks something like a mail box.

There were tiny holes punched into the top of this box to let a little bit of air into the 4 standing cells which were behind this wall in the basement. During the winter when snow covered these holes, the prisoners suffocated. Old pictures taken when the camp was in operation show that there were several of these boxes, but there is only one there now.

A description of the standing cells in Block 11 can be found in the book entitled “Das Bunkerbuch des Blocks 11, im Nazi-Konzentrationslager Auschwitz,” written by Franciszek Brol, Gerard Wloch, and Jan Pilecki, Hefte von Auschwitz [prisoners from Auschwitz], which was published in 1959.

On page 120 of this book is a “Plan of the Bunker of Block 11 redrawn after the original plan No. 1152 of March 16, 1942.” On this plan, the four Stehzellen in Cell 22 are marked out and numbered 1-4.

My photo of the prison cell at Dachau which was allegedly made into standing cells

My photo of the prison cell at Dachau which was allegedly made into standing cells

In 1944, a harsh punishment was allegedly devised for prisoners at Dachau when 3 of the regular cells were divided into standing cells. A poster in my photograph above illustrates how this was accomplished.

The walls of the standing cells were made out of wood and each standing cell was 2 ft. 6 inches square. Prisoners who had been condemned to this punishment were put into a standing cell for 72 hours at a time with no light or air.

Bishop Johannes Neuhäusler, who was a “special prisoner” in the bunker, wrote that “the prisoner was compelled to stand for three days and three nights and was given only bread and water; every fourth day he came into a normal cell, ate prisoner’s fare and was allowed to sleep for one night on a plank bed. Then three days’ standing began again. Such were the abominations which the prisoners had to bear from the sadistic Nazis.”

According to information given in the bunker exhibit, the wooden walls of the standing cells were removed by the American Army in 1945 after Dachau was liberated.

Strangely, the same thing happened at Auschwitz when the Soviet liberators of the camp tore down the standing cells.

It is too bad that 90-year-old Gisela S. will not be wheeled into a German courtroom on a stretcher for a trial, so that the prosecution could prove the existence of the standing cells.

My photo of a one-person prison cell at Natzweiler camp

My photo of a one-person prison cell at Natzweiler camp

My photo above shows a punishment cell at the Natzweiler-Struthof camp in Alsace. This cell was big enough for a prisoner to sit in, but not big enough for a prisoner to stand up nor to lie down. Prisoners who broke the rules in the Natzweiler camp were put into these cells for three days with nothing but bread and water. After the Natzweiler camp was closed, some of the political prisoners were brought to Dachau, including the British SOE agent Albert Guerisse, who became the leader of the prisoners group known as the International Committee of Dachau.

14 Comments »

  1. Hopefully this will be the last attempt to prosecute elderly former clerks, radio operators, guards, cafeteria staff, etc. A waste of taxpayer money and time.

    Comment by HCW — November 3, 2015 @ 9:44 am

    • Or it could be that the defense would have disputed the claim that there were standing cells at Auschwitz. The Soviets RECONSTRUCTED these cells. A former prisoner claimed to have been a prisoner in a “standing cell” at Auschwitz for 9 weeks. The Soviets also RECONSTRUCTED the gas chamber in the main Auschwitz camp.

      Comment by furtherglory — November 3, 2015 @ 9:55 am

      • You have a point……….but I still feel these trials are a waste of time.

        Comment by HCW — November 3, 2015 @ 10:23 am

      • You show a picture of a punishment cell at Natzweiler. You don’t question it, are you saying that these cells were used only at Natzweiler? If the SS built these cells at Natzweiler, why would they not have these at other concentration camps? The camps themselves followed the same general rules and guidelines. The SS built these camps to follow the same general layout.

        Comment by HCW — November 3, 2015 @ 10:39 am

      • You said the cell was big enough to sit in but not stand up or lay down, did you mean stand up in but not sit or lie down?
        Don’t want to be nit picky but that seems strange.

        Comment by HCW — November 3, 2015 @ 10:44 am

    • HCW: “A waste of taxpayer money and time.”

      A large portion of Gentile cattle hearing of terrible Nazi standing cells is not a waste of taxpayer money and time. Just as the upbuilding of cathedrals becomes a waste of money and time only in an atheistic world. Indoctrination to diversity and the normality of Jewish hegemony, through terror and lies, is an essential gear of the New World Order.

      Comment by hermie — November 3, 2015 @ 8:44 pm

      • I thought Jett Rucker’s term “sheeple” more clever than “Gentile cattle”.
        I’m not complaining, mind you. I just like it aesthetically, more of a personal choice.

        Comment by HCW — November 3, 2015 @ 9:08 pm

        • “Sheeple” is fine too. But don’t forget that English is only my 3rd language.

          Comment by hermie — November 4, 2015 @ 6:03 am

          • I never would have guessed that English is your third language. I have never noticed any mistakes in English in your comments.

            Comment by furtherglory — November 4, 2015 @ 6:26 am

          • I agree with FG. Your English is very good, I would not have guessed you are not a native speaker.

            Comment by HCW — November 4, 2015 @ 7:11 am

            • Thank you, guys. Flattered. Glad to see that my comments are intelligible and easily read.

              Comment by hermie — November 4, 2015 @ 8:20 am

              • I envy your skill with languages. I don’t possess the ability. I’m ok with Spanish but that’s it…..and I’ve probably lost it because I no longer use it.

                Comment by HCW — November 4, 2015 @ 8:37 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: