Scrapbookpages Blog

December 3, 2015

95 year old German man will be put on trial for murdering 3,681 people at Auschwitz-Birkenau

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust — Tags: , — furtherglory @ 10:28 am
Hubert Zafke, depraved war criminal who will soon go on trial in Germany

Hubert Zafke, depraved war criminal who will soon go on trial in Germany

You can read the full story of this 95-year-old depraved criminal in a recent news story here.

This is the headline of the article:

Former Auschwitz guard who was on duty when Anne Frank arrived in 1944 is deemed fit enough to face charges of murdering 3,681 people.

Oh well, if he was at Auschwitz-Birkenau, when Anne Frank got off the train, and he didn’t lift a finger to help her, he should be put into prison for the rest of his life, provided that he lives through his trial.

This quote is from the news article:

Begin quote:

Hubert Zafke, 95, served as medic but claims he played no part in murders
Psychiatric doctors have ruled he is mentally sound enough to stand trial
Prosecutors say murders took place in medical block while he was on duty
Medics often poured Zyklon-B pesticide into the gas chambers to kill them

End quote

Oh no! As part of his job as a medic, “He often poured Zyklon-B pesticide into the gas chambers.”

He was pouring PESTICIDE into gas chambers?

Was he trying to kill lice or people? Would it have killed the Germans to execute the Jews in a nice way and save the pesticide for killing the lice that spread typhus.

Moving right along, this quote is from the news article:

Begin quote:
A former SS guard who was on duty when Jewish diarist Anne Frank arrived at the Auschwitz death camp in 1944 has been fit enough to stand trial on charges of mass murder.

Hubert Zafke, 95, was examined by psychiatric doctors this week appointed by a court in Rostock and judged mentally sound enough to go on trial for his part in the murders of 3,681 people.

Zafke served at the Nazi extermination facility in occupied Poland as a medic and claims he took no part in the estimated 1.2 million murders of Jews and others that took place there. [Only 1.2 million?  What about the 4 million Jews that were mentioned at the Nuremberg IMT? What happened to them?]

Earlier this year a lower court ruled Zafke was incompetent to stand trial but that has now been overturned and he could be in the dock by the early spring.

End quote

At the very end of the news article, there is a video that shows young children marching out of Auschwitz-Birkenau; it also shows old women talking to the Soviet liberators of Birkenau.  This video is completely inappropriate.  As everyone know, children under the age of 15 were gassed, and old ladies were also gassed.

34 Comments »

  1. Rostock is an ugly port city on the Baltic with many old Communists. It even has a street named after Stalin’s propaganda minister and mass murderer Ilya Ehrenburg.

    https://www.kombinat-fortschritt.com/2012/03/07/kommentar-ob-der-hansestadt-rostock-macht-politik-mit-neonazi-forderung/

    Comment by peter — December 5, 2015 @ 7:48 am

    • Is this Ilya Ehrenburg, the same Jewish gentleman who printed tens of thousands of leaflets and dropped them from airplanes over Russian troops just as they were about to advance into Germany?

      If so, he was certainly a very remarkable man. And his thoughtful and imaginative words of advice to these young men armed with guns will certainly live on down through the ages.

      He wrote:- ” Kill ! Kill ! – In the German race there is nothing but evil: not one among the living, nor among the yet unborn but is evil…Use force, and break the racial pride of the German women. Take them as your lawful booty. ”

      My oh my! – what kind of twisted, perverted mind could have dreamed up this kind of despicable inhuman message – let alone have it printed on leaflets and delivered directly from the air. ( And note how he slyly includes pregnant women as legitimate targets to be ravished! )

      Comment by Talbot — December 5, 2015 @ 2:04 pm

  2. That does sound unfair what happened to your relative, Mr Stolpmann. And that just shows us how the judicial process everywhere in the world can be manipulated by governments and other outside interests. Laws and statutes are altered as the political climate and the regime changes. What is regarded as unlawful and criminal today can be regarded as simply OK, and even laudable a few years later.

    The threat to send your relative back to the Soviet Union is a typical intimidatory trick that the police and intelligence services often use to make their victims compliant in order to gain as much information out of them as possible. I’m quite certain that the threat to hand over German individuals – or their families – to the Soviets just after the war made them compliant, and thus quite ready and eager to come out with testimonies that were favourable to the WW2 victors requirements.

    Comment by Talbot — December 4, 2015 @ 11:37 pm

  3. furtherglory wrote: “Would it have killed the Germans to execute the Jews in a nice way and save the pesticide for killing the lice that spread typhus.”

    How could the average idiot distinguish between democratic humans and barbaric beasts in that case? Saddam’s “gas chambers for all Jews”, Bachar’s gas bombs on his own people, the Serbian death camps (Friket Alic’s thinness helped a lot in selling the lie of a “Belsen 1992”), etc. all those unimpeachable information helped the US citizens to understand why their country had to fight another “war to end all wars”.

    When a country is a hole full of sanctimonious morons really believing the world needs them to make it a better place, the vilification of anybody involved in a war against that country is inescapable. Atrocity propaganda is the lot of all the wars fought by countries full of childish wannabee good doers. Atrocity propaganda is as part of the democracies’ armoury as bullets and rockets.

    Comment by hermie — December 3, 2015 @ 7:53 pm

  4. Great article, FG – I had a good chuckle!

    I’m looking forward to the names of the 3,681 “murdered” victims being read out in court – plus the dates and the precise locations where they all died. This is normal practise in legal trials – because a defendant must know who he has alleged to have killed, and where and when he did so. Otherwise he cannot defend himself properly against the charges. But I suspect the whole idea of this “trial” has got nothing to do with justice, but is just a piece of theatre to keep the old holohoax scam rolling along nicely. After all, the public have got to be kept on board with regular circuses, pantomimes, and fairground rides.

    So Mr Zafke was employed as a medic at Auschwitz, and he had his turn at pouring the Zyklon B pellets into the chambers. They will be telling us next that the telephonists and typists in the SS headquarters were having a go at throwing cans of the stuff into the gas chambers as well.

    The article stated “an estimated 1.2 million Jews and others were murdered there”. Oh I see, this figure is only “estimated” – it is not a firmly established total. Methinks they are hedging their bets – just in case the numbers have to be revised downwards, which would leave them looking silly again!

    Comment by Talbot — December 3, 2015 @ 12:49 pm

    • On second thoughts, they wouldn’t have names to read out, because the inmates were all given numbers which were tattooed on their arms ( some even with invisible ink – like Eli Weizel ). So instead of names, all these numbers would have to be read out in court. Most people contemplating listening to all that would clasp their head in their hands and rush for the exit. But knowing the Germans for their seriousness and meticulous record-keeping, they would sit solemnly and obediently, gravely listening to each number as its being announced, and checking thoroughly to see that there are no inaccuracies, and that the final total adds up to 3,681.

      Comment by Talbot — December 3, 2015 @ 1:33 pm

      • Can you imagine a scene in the court, where the prosecutor is standing up and accusing the depraved Hubert Zafke of murdering prisoners 356798, 427329, 673295, and 885317; whereupon the enfeebled 95 year-old delinquent rises hesitantly to his feet in order to grab his zimmer frame, and object in a feeble voice, saying, that inmate no. 885317 died accidently. He was given the job of cleaning and painting the sign “ARBEIT MACH FREI” above the main gate at Auschwitz. But unfortunately he fell off the scaffolding, fell to the ground, and broke his skull.

        The prosecutor would then demand sternly; And what do the words “Arbeit Mach Frei” stand for? And the quavering voice of the wicked former medic would come back;- “It roughly translates as work “makes you free”. We put this sign up to tell the incoming inmates that if they work hard, then they won’t suffer any constipation. The symptoms will be alleviated, and thus they’ll be free.

        Comment by Talbot — December 3, 2015 @ 3:51 pm

        • “He was given the job of cleaning and painting the sign “ARBEIT MACH FREI” above the main gate at Auschwitz. But unfortunately he fell off the scaffolding, fell to the ground, and broke his skull.”

          Now repeat ad nauseam, repeat and repeat. Broadcast and repeat.,..conduct paid for historical research..get foundation client academics..paid for media drunks…conflating imagineering technicians to pontificate and publish referencing…and repeat. Drown out all competing narratives, false or true, actual or imagined, repeat, repeat, repeat….and you can invent history just like everyone else in Alice in ZyklotronBland. Anyone who has watched the Derren Brown horse betting sure winner trick will know that it is just time and numbers.

          The modern concept of history is now so fictionlike that it is almost impossible to get to the “truth” other than through legal vermin walls where the real dead lie.

          Anyway Talbot I do chuckle at your vignette. You can be sure that no way will an admiralty court allow such hijinx to scupper a reinforcement of history as precedent setting setting.

          If any of the Turing fails that read/post here can understand that then do drop me a line.🙂

          Hic!! I’m a cider drinker, not Guinness.

          Comment by thestoker — December 4, 2015 @ 2:00 am

          • God Bless You – Mr Stoker, I might have a drink or two myself this Christmas. And then, after the New Year revelries are over, we’ll all be in the countdown to Holohoax Day on the 27th January. Great fun will be had by one and all. Just think – 71 years of fabrications and fairy tales ever since the Soviet Red Army arrived in Auschwitz.

            Comment by Talbot — December 4, 2015 @ 4:29 am

          • I actually prefer Guiness myself, Stoker. Perhaps a nice Black and Tan with some Bass ale, that hits the spot. Truthfully I don’t really drink anymore, I realize it’s an odd Irishman that doesn’t drink but perhaps I can make an exception this upcoming Christmas.
            You are more coherent today, bravo. It’s also nice to see you bonding with Talbot, it’s nice to see people make friends.
            Perhaps you two can exchange swastika Christmas cards.

            Comment by HCW — December 4, 2015 @ 5:05 am

        • The Arbeit Macht Frei gate at Auschwitz was made of metal and it was not painted.

          Comment by furtherglory — December 4, 2015 @ 4:07 pm

          • Oh, my how these petty minor details get blurry in the mists of time! Let’s just settle for rust inhibitor the filthy kike bastard was applying with a brush.

            Comment by Peter — February 11, 2016 @ 3:41 pm

    • IHR had this report

      Reuters

      http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/12/01/us-germany-nazi-trial-idUSKBN0TK5AV20151201

      A German court on Tuesday permitted the trial of a 95-year-old German man accused of being an accessory to the murder of at least 3,681 people at the Nazi death camp Auschwitz-Birkenau. The higher court of Rostock in northern Germany deemed Hubert Z. fit for trial … Z., whose last name is confidential due to German privacy laws, was a sergeant in the Nazi SS at Auschwitz from October 1943 to January 1944 and acted as one of the death camp’s paramedics from Aug. 15 to Sept. 14, 1944, the indictment said …

      THIS is why they wont call the names or numbers… He is guilty because he was part of the SS garrison there.

      Although Z. is not accused of having been directly involved in any killings, the prosecution’s office holds that he was well aware of the camp’s function as a facility for mass murder and by joining its organizational structure consciously participated and even accelerated the deaths of thousands of people.

      Comment by Greg — December 3, 2015 @ 5:48 pm

      • Oh – I see, he’s guilty even before the trial takes place. What a truly magnificent legal system they have in Germany today! I’m quite sure that government’s all over the world will be more than eager to embrace such a system in their own countries.

        My goodness me, and there is no necessity to prove that any identifiable victims even existed. The prosecutor’s office – plus the higher court in Rostock – have pompously declared that Hubert Z. “acted as one of the death camp’s paramedics”. I don’t now about other people, but I find the concept of a paramedic operating inside a death camp to be utterly absurd. But then the entire holocaust is absurd – so what’s new here?

        Can you imagine the seedy, grubby type of legal personnel who infest the courts in the eminently forgettable, fly-blown Baltic port of Rostock? Nothing has ever happened there since the Iron Curtain came down back in 1989, and I’ve no doubt that most of these worthless individuals thought that if the national and international media spotlight is focused on their crumby little town and its crackpot courts, then they would happily oblige in sending Mr Z. to be crucified in front of the world’s gaze as an evil war criminal.

        Comment by Talbot — December 3, 2015 @ 7:48 pm

    • But will he have the benefit of a defence lawyer? The last one who defended a holohoax denier, revisionist (the ultimate sin apparently) ended up in gaol for having the temerity and hide to act as a lawyer for the defence!

      Comment by Peter — February 11, 2016 @ 3:17 pm

  5. At any rate we should listen to what this man will say and evaluate the information for better historical research.

    Comment by Wolf MURMELSTEIN — December 3, 2015 @ 12:00 pm

    • Wolf, as I’m sure you know, he will be tried in Germany, where it is against the law to ‘deny the Holocaust’ — if he were to do that in court, he would just be charged with another crime — to avoid that, he must either keep quiet or repeat the conventional story of Auschwitz as a ‘death camp’, even if he may have no direct knowledge of that, or believe it — for this reason, anything said during these trials is tainted and useless.

      Comment by eah — December 3, 2015 @ 12:25 pm

      • That’s precisely the reason why wolfie called it “information for better historical research”, eah. There is no risk for him. He knows as much as we do that every word told during this new Holocaust theater play will be consistent with the orthodox narrative. Even more certain as we all know that this old man will never see the interior of a prison cell. “Guilty but released because of poor health” is the typical outcome. The only intent of such judicial farces is to secure additional non-probative testimonial ‘evidence’ for the future. Always good to impress the gullible.

        Comment by hermie — December 3, 2015 @ 8:09 pm

  6. Sheesh, at least pick your complaint. If your complaint is that a 95 year old shouldn’t stand trial for acts committed decades ago, you would have been ok with it if he was implicated sooner, when he was younger? If he is found to have had a part in murder, why should he have the opportunity to die peacefully in his own bed, which the people caught in the killing machine he aided did not have?
    Pesticides, by the way, are poisonous by definition, and while in amounts generally used as “pesticides” they will not kill humans (though long term effects are less clear…), in acute doses they can certainly cause death in humans. (For those that did need fumigation for lice, why were they in such a condition to begin with? Oh right, they were forced into deplorable conditions with horrible overcrowding and lack of basic sanitation by people who considered them sub-human because of their birth religion.)
    Do you have any reason to suggest that the children and elderly women in the video were not very recent arrivals, during the time in which murders were called off, as you have acknowledged in other posts?

    There are so many causes that could benefit from research and writing to help people today. Why you instead spend your time writing such complaints and purported inconsistencies from a horrible period in recent history in which millions of innocent people died to try to claim that the horrors were not as horrific as they were is unfathomable.

    Comment by Halli — December 3, 2015 @ 11:54 am

    • Halli wrote: “(For those that did need fumigation for lice, why were they in such a condition to begin with? Oh right, they were forced into deplorable conditions with horrible overcrowding and lack of basic sanitation by people who considered them sub-human because of their birth religion.)”

      Clothes and beddings were fumigated for lice wit Zyklon B, not people. In German concentration camps, the inmates were deloused by means of showers and soap, not by means of Zyklon B.

      Typhus alone killed millions of people in Eastern Europe during WW1 and the following years. No Schindler’s List-like matyrology was needed for the emergence of large epidemics in that area. Wars were enough for that.

      Your spoiled child’s “lack of basic sanitation” thing made me laugh. Ironically the place where most Eastern Jews of those days saw a shower for the first time in their entire life, was very probably a German concentration camp or another.

      Comment by hermie — December 3, 2015 @ 8:29 pm

      • General Patton, the “fightingest general”, (type the following string ‘general patton the fightingest general’ into Google. There you will uncover Patton’s heroic attempts to save Eastern Europe from the Stalinist yoke and how the Jews killed him for it.
        Patton claimed his forces had the means to defeat Russia at that time in a matter of weeks and agitated his higher command (Ike Eisenhower, see google: Eienhowers death camps’ whereby up to 2 million Germans were starved to death in his concentration camps after the war had ended. Of course had he got his way the Korean war and Vietnam wars would have never occurred.
        Patton, like all the allies, particularly the Americans, been subject to all of the relentless hate speech and anti German hysteria pushed by the Zionist Jews in Jew-merica (the land of the Jews).
        He soon came to his senses however, when he actually met some real Germans upon ‘liberating’ Germany in the immediate aftermath of the war. Quickly waking up to the Jews criminality he claimed, soon before they assassinated him that the allies were in danger of destroying “the finest race in Europe.”
        He then began to fight against the Jewish genocidal plan, fell foul of them and was murdered as a consequence.
        Patton also commented that the Eastern European Jews that he first met, who had moved in like rats upon the ‘liberated’ Germans, raping pillaging and plundering under the orders of Stalin’s Jewish commissars as well as the JewSA and British/French thugs. “Stank so much I nearly brought up my lunch.”

        Comment by Peter — February 11, 2016 @ 3:59 pm

    • My complaint with these trials of 90-year-old men and women is the fact that a trial will occur but even with a conviction the defendant will be too old to complete or even start a sentence with the appeals process.
      To me this is a waste time. It feels to me as if the German Government is making a pathetic attempt to correct decades old wrongs and trying to make up for the really poor job it did in failing to prosecute top level Nazi members who remained in Germany or Austria after the war….or fled to other countries and the Germans failed to try and expedite them.
      Another problem I have is the ability of the accused to get a fair trial after over 70 years have passed. What evidence exists to convict this person? How reliable could witnesses really be after all of this time? Was he actually directly or indirectly responsible for any crime? Being at Auschwitz and being a member of the SS does not automatically mean he actually did anything wrong.
      These are my issues. A better use for these men and women would be to sit them down and record their memories for history.

      Comment by HCW — December 4, 2015 @ 8:22 am

      • HCW wrote: “Was he actually directly or indirectly responsible for any crime? Being at Auschwitz and being a member of the SS does not automatically mean he actually did anything wrong.”

        Being a defeated enemy in a democratic war is wrong. The sanctimonious democratic claim-to-be vigilantes can’t just butcher their defeated enemies like in ancient times. Not after stating so noisily that they were the saviors of good and even civilization itself, nothing less! Their public opinion at home wouldn’t allow such a brutality. But they can and must execute ‘criminals’, ‘barbarians’. (Isn’t that what righters of wrong do afer all?) This is where the democratic victor’s mock trials are useful. The judicial-looking criminalization, barbarization of a defeated enemy is the prerequisite necessary for the butchering of the latter during the democratization stage in the newly-conquered lands (a new province of the democratic hydra). And being a former member of a defeated gang – a gang with a criminal “common scheme”, as they say – is wrong. That’s a crime. The victorious allies of 1945 decreed it so.

        All this, of course, doesn’t apply to this precise case. The mock trial of Herr Zafke is pure Zionist media circus. And the securing of farcical testimonial ‘evidence’ for future days is a bonus in this comedy.

        Comment by hermie — December 4, 2015 @ 6:22 pm

      • A fair trial? What a sick joke. Even the defence lawyers are terrified of questioning the official Jew narrative for fear of losing their own liberty. It is absolutely outrageous. The holocaust was ” The Greatest Lie Ever Told” see YouTube video. It’s a proven lie. Study up on Erntz Zundel and other revisionists he clearly proved lawfully the entire thing is a hoax designed to persecute the German people and lay a perpetual guilt trip on them for all time. That is why Germany is being subject to an unprecedented invasion of third world dregs at present. The aim is Genocide, not only of Germans who the Jews regard as their greatest threat against their lust for world domination and absolute power, but White people generally, by implication have all been tarred with the same brush for something that never even happened. Of being broadly speaking responsible for the most horrific genocide of all time, at least according to the Jews. The Nuremberg trials were a kangaroo court, a sham and travesty of justice. Since when has post WW2 German law had anything to do with justice? Since the end of WW2 and Germany became a Zionist Occupied Country once again, as it was under the Jewish run Weimar republic. Under Hitler of course justice returned briefly as he put all of the Weimar republic Jews on trial, as well as the Jewish underworld that had played such havoc upon the German people under the Weimar’s tyranny.
        What’s the difference between milking a cow and the so called holocaust? Ans: You can’t milk a cow for 76 years.
        The so called Jewish holocaust (holohoax) ” the only holocaust in history proven by countless survivors.”

        Comment by Peter — February 11, 2016 @ 3:31 pm

  7. “Fit enough?” Isn’t that redundant? If fitness is to be considered, I wonder if the fitness of the young conscript might also be considered.
    Nah – that’d let him off straightaway. Can’t do that.
    3,681? I wonder if HE counted. If he has a lower number in mind, he will be prevented from claiming it.

    Comment by Jett Rucker — December 3, 2015 @ 11:02 am

    • Don’t forget that the Allies loved hanging these ‘God-damned Nazi Krauts’ after the war. The US strangled In five and half years, at Landsberg prison nearly 300 condemned war criminals. 259 death sentences were conducted by hanging and 29 by firing squad. Executions were carried out expeditiously. In May 1946 twenty eight former SS guards from Dachau were hanged within a four-day period. Bodies that were not claimed were buried in unmarked graves in the cemetery next to the Spöttingen chapel. [No females were executed in the American Zone of Occupation]
      The Brits weren’t any better, A total of 190 men and 10 women were hanged at Hameln Prison (near Hanover) in Germany under British jurisdiction. The executions were carried out by Albert Pierrepoint who was flown in specially on each occasion. [The stationed hangman Cook refused to hang women, went home and shot himself.
      It was decided that those sentenced to die should suffer death by hanging for both sexes, although no standard execution protocol was agreed. Each country carried out executions in accordance with its normal procedure. The Poles and Czechs conducted the hangings in public for the benefit of the celebrating population, let alone what the Russians ever did.
      So what is all the fuss about one old man being tried in a show-trial, reminiscent of the Stalin era, with some refinements, for alleged killings of inmates in Auschwitz? He is guilty before he even enters that old run-down courtroom.
      I just ‘love’ the comments of these post-war philosophers on this blog.

      Comment by Herbert Stolpmann — December 4, 2015 @ 2:14 am

      • @Herbert Stolpmann

        How would you, and your family and friends feel if you were dragged out of retirement at the age of 95 to be accused of the most ridiculous offences imaginable. You’re right to call it a “show trial” – and its been instigated by the Simon Wiesenthal Center, led by their Chief Nazi Hunter, Efraim Zuroff. Mr Zuroff has declared a public campaign called “Operation Last Chance”, in which he is desperate to get as many elderly Germans into court before they pass away – or, of course, he pops his own clogs first! I’ve no doubt that money lies at the root of all this nonsense.

        Just because many accused war criminals were hastily tried and executed in kangaroo courts and military tribunals immediately after WW2 in the frenzied, vindictive, destructive, atmosphere of wartime Europe, doesn’t mean that similar standards of chicanery should apply today. We live in a relatively peaceful world, where the normal rules of law and justice should be applied. Therefore, only if there are real, verifiable crimes that can be labelled against Hubert Z. should a trial be allowed go ahead.

        From the limited information that I have read on Mr Z, he only held the rank of sergeant in the SS, and he seems to have been a medic working in the Birkenau hospital keeping people alive. In addition, it would appear that he was on duty there for only one month during the late summer of 1944.

        But at least one good thing will emerge from this so-called “trial”; the world will begin to see how craven and stupid the modern-day German government and its legal authorities really are.

        Comment by Talbot — December 4, 2015 @ 5:16 am

        • Back in July this year, just after the trial and conviction of the “Auschwitz Bookeeper”, Oskar Groening, the Chief Nazi Hunter himself appeared on TV and announced that “at least several additional trials can be expected”.

          Good old “Effie” – the gallant, fearless warrior for truth and justice! Where would we all be without him?

          He just couldn’t wait to tell the world about his future plans, and was salivating in delight at the prospect of 10 further court cases that he was in the process of orchestrating. There is a Danish SS volunteer on his list, who it is claimed was involved in the Soviet Union, plus some other elderly men who live in Germany, Canada and Norway.

          This Nazi hunting business must be very rewarding politically and financially, because I cannot believe that someone like “Effie” would waste his time chasing around the world after very old men if there was not some benefit for himself and the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

          I remember the fiasco of the trial involving John Demjanjuk in Israel some years back. The lunatics who brought the charges against this man had completely mis-identified him, and they even bussed in some weird “survivors” from somewhere-or-other to swear on oath that he was definitely a Ukrainian character named “Ivan The Terrible”.

          But what’s going to happen when all these elderly men are dead, and cannot be pursued anymore. Do you think they’ll dig up the bodies of SS men and put their skeletons on trial. You might laugh at that idea – but they did introduce a shrunken head into the Nuremburg Tribunals; and I maybe wrong, but I think they also had a barrel full of skulls at the Eichmann trial in 1960. The reason they might do this, is because these men’s families could have real estate, bank accounts, shares and bonds that would be ripe for easy picking.

          Comment by Talbot — December 4, 2015 @ 7:55 am

          • You didn’t mention that the ISREALI SUPREME COURT exonerated the man and sent him home. I wanted to make sure you understood that so that you can stop hyperventilating over the injustice of it all.
            Please stop the ridiculous insinuation that this is just an excuse to steal from the elderly. The trial is a huge waste of time and money, even with a conviction it is unlikely the man will spend anytime in jail due to his age.
            No, this is just some belated effort the German Government feels compelled to do to assuage its conscience over doing a piss poor job in the 1950’s of prosecuting Nazi bigwigs it let slip through its fingers.

            Comment by HCW — December 4, 2015 @ 8:32 am

          • The title “Chief Nazi Hunter” is quite interesting, because it implies that Effraim Zuroff has battalions of hunting troops who serve under him. I wonder if they trawl around the hospitals, care homes for the elderly, day centres, and clinics inside Germany and Austria searching out all those elderly war criminals and bringing them to justice.

            And the name Simon Wiesenthal is not without controversy either. He was pretty useless as a so-called “Nazi hunter”, and came in for lot of criticism for his ineffectual work in this field. He was suspected at one time of being a Nazi collaborator himself, and even the Austrian Chancellor – Dr Bruno Kreisky – described him as a “gestapo agent”. ( fair enough, Kreisky had to apologise after the Austrian courts found him guilty of libel. But there’s no smoke without fire, as they say! )

            Comment by Talbot — December 5, 2015 @ 1:31 pm

          • That disgusting Jew rat Simon Wiesenthal. Check the bastard out on YouTube with his hair dresser designed skillfully messed up hair do! It’s all part of the carefully stage managed Hebe vicious lie, Hollywood puke and filth, deliberately intended to look as if he is still so traumatised by the greatest hoax in history that he can’t manage to put a comb through his filthy stinking mangy hair. That slimy fraud, that disguising little kike bastard makes me want to puke.

            Comment by Peter — February 11, 2016 @ 4:17 pm

        • Well I have experienced a sort of trial within our family circle. It happened to one of my mothers brother, an experienced war-time reporter mainly in Russia, but was transferred to Groningen (Holland) after escaping twice from Soviet custody.
          He had filmed the capture of a Dutch leading Partisan by the Gestapo and according to the then post-war criminal codes had done nothing to help him (which has not changed much to this date) and thus found guilty by assisting in his capture. My uncle claimed that the courts simply distorted the rules of comman law and sentenced him to one year jail term with the threat to extradite him to Russia, if he would not co-operate in their inquires.
          He was bitter over the procedure of the court to the very end of his life.

          Comment by Herbert Stolpmann — December 4, 2015 @ 3:14 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: