Scrapbookpages Blog

January 10, 2016

Letter written by Holocaust victim moments before she entered the gas chamber

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust — Tags: , , , — furtherglory @ 9:38 am

There is a common mistaken perception that the German people are cruel and hateful.  After all, they did kill 6 million Jews — for no reason at all.

But in my personal experience, I have always found the German people to be extremely nice and always helpful.  To give you an idea, I have traveled extensively in Germany, in my old age, and I never once had to throw my suitcase up on a train.  The person behind me, man or woman, always grabbed my suitcase and threw it onto the train for me. And this was not a heavy suitcase; I could have handled it myself, in case the person behind me was not German.

This morning, I read a news story about a woman who was gassed at Auschwitz, but the Nazis were kind enough to allow her to write a letter to her family, just before she boarded a truck that would take her to the gas chamber.  That letter survived the war.

To me, this proves that the Germans are nice people, always considerate and helpful.

You can read the story of the letter in this news article:

Begin quote:

PALM BEACH, Fla. —Frank Grunwald is a Holocaust survivor. He was separated from his family when he was 12 years old.

Grunwald and his father survived. His older brother and his mother were never to be seen or heard from again.

Grunwald always wondered what happened to his mother, and it wasn’t until his father passed away years later that he discovered a letter that explained it all. He found a note written on July 11, 1944, hours before she [his mother] was killed in a gas chamber.

Grunwald wanted the letter to be preserved, so he is donating it to the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C.

At the Temple Emanu-El of Palm Beach on Wednesday night, museum officials accepted the letter and shared the story of Grunwald.

End quote from news article

In the video that is included with the news article, a woman explains that the Nazis allowed the Jews to “keep pencil and paper” in case the Red Cross made an inspection of the camp.

So it was only because of the Red Cross that this woman was able to write a letter while she was on the truck taking her to the gas chamber.

Wait a minute! Where was this “gas chamber” located?

Was it at the far end of the the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp, over a mile from the entrance to the camp?


The building called “the central sauna” is shown in the photo above

Was this woman actually on a truck that was taking her to the Sauna for a shower.  The Sauna building, where the clothing was disinfected and incoming prisoners were given a shower, was at the far end of the camp, about a mile from the entrance gate into the camp.

This woman might have been confused about where the truck was taking her.  Her 12 year old daughter was not being taken on this same truck.  This should have alerted the woman to the possibility that she was not on her way to the gas chamber.  The daughter survived, although the alleged policy of the Nazis was to gas everyone under the age of 15.


  1. Mr. Grunwald never knew what happened to his mother? Okay. Everybody was locked down at the camp. This idiot couldn’t put 2 and 2 together? Just maybe,mom got bumped off at the camp. He didn’t question what happened to his brother? Dad didn’t want to say shit (can’t figure out why),but why didn’t his sister say anything? Another thing. Red Cross inspected the camps. If they were torching bodies like the Jews said they were,wouldn’t that place reek big time?wouldnt the Red Cross question the foul odor? Did this lady give the letter to a Red Cross rep for safe keeping? If the Krauts were on an assembly line of murder,there’s no way they’d let this lady give them the letter. There’s a rat in the wood pile here.

    Comment by Tim — February 25, 2016 @ 11:04 pm

    • Most excellent points. Again, I turn you to the author of MYTH OF GERMAN VILLAINY, should you have not read it – well worth it. Here is the interview Jim Rizoli had with Benton Bradberry.

      Comment by Diane King — February 26, 2016 @ 7:24 am

  2. Some good reasoning here from Ben Bradbury when someone complained about his book.
    It pretty much sums up the wholeHoloHoax experience doesn’t it…..

    Ben to Mr. White…
    Mr. White, in debates, normal conversations, or in Anglo/Saxon jurisprudence, it is the responsibility of the accuser, or the person presenting a proposition, to prove his case. It is not enough to merely make a propositional statement without any hard evidence to back it up. The listener has no responsibility to prove a negative, or to disprove the proposition you presented without any evidence. It is up to you to prove your case.

    Let’s see, let’s use an example. You state to a group of people that, “While walking in the woods I saw a UFO alien spacecraft land in a clearing. Three space aliens got out and walked around. They even took my dog, then got back in, and the thing took off again and disappeared.” The listener says, “I don’t believe you. Do you have any evidence that such a thing occurred?” You say, “Yes, I have eye witnesses. Two other people were with me who will swear that they saw it too. Besides, my dog is missing. Do you see my dog? Well, then, how can you say it didn’t happen?” You ask, “Do you have any ‘real’ evidence, like a photograph, or even exhaust burn marks on the ground, anything?” You say, “No, but my ‘eye witnesses are very reliable. They would never tell a lie. ” Well, that about summarizes the “Holocaust” story. No forensic evidence that any of the “Holocaust” actually occurred, but thousands of Jewish “eye witnesses,” all, incidentally telling conflicting, contradictory stories, most so preposterous that a rational person could not possible believe any of it.

    Let’s see again. You say, “I saw 2,000 Jews being herded into the “gas chamber” at Auschwitz, and then 15 minutes later, they opened the door and they were all dead. Not only that, but they did this repeatedly throughout the day, day in and day out, until in the end, they gassed and burned 4 million Jews. In fact, by this method, during a 6 week period in 1944 they gassed 440,000 Hungarian Jews, then disposed of their bodies by burning them in their crematoria, so that there was no evidence of what happened left behind.” The listener asks, “Where’s your proof.” You say, “I have 5,000 Jewish eye witnesses, all ‘Holocaust survivors’ of Auschwitz. But I don’t have any ‘forensic’ evidence because those clever Germans destroyed every single bit of it before they pulled out. So you have to believe the ‘eye witnesses.’ ” You Jews may well be smarter than the rest of us, as you claim, but even we Goyim are not dumb enough to swallow that.

    So, Mr Irving Wiese (I.White), it is up to you who make these preposterous Holocaust claims to prove your case, not us “deniers” to disprove it. So far, you have not proved your case, but because Jews control the information and entertainment media throughout the West, you have persuaded the low information public that the Holocaust actually happened. Fortunately there are enough smart people around who actually ask for proof. We “deniers” are simply asking for proof. Back to you, Irving.

    Ben Bradberry

    Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 8:45 am

  3. My grandfather lost a wife and 5 kids in auschwitz he was a nazi hunter and I’m here because in this after the war my mother was born to a german women . I think the germans are wonderful and my grandfather wrote about the good germans and the not so good jews in is diary (i didn’t published it yet, a year ago i found it) i was so happy i didn’t find more hate in his book, i really think we should from the holocaust like the germans learn, they should be proud of what they become from this and we mustn’t forgot the holocaust victims, heros, German, gews and anyone. . This were our family after all.. I proud of being part german part jewish. . I going to write also post for the germans on 27.1 . Thank you .

    Comment by meirav kaye — January 21, 2016 @ 11:38 pm

    • Not to be insensitive, but you are one of an untold number touting this story that condemned a nation of people. So, HOW did your grandfather “lose the 5 kids and wife” in Auschwitz? Since there is no verifiable way to prove gas chambers, might I conclude typhus, which was rampant especially toward the end of the war? Also in remember ‘victims’, let’s not forget the German victims to the tune of 20 million from the war.

      Comment by Diane King — January 22, 2016 @ 12:03 pm

      • diana i’m not the one to open any holocoast disscushion. this was about my love to the german people that i’m hopping to find betwean them my family… i dont know how’ but what can i say, i run out the jewish side long time ago.. so i need this to be about life. i promise you gas chambers is not part of my story,i choose to tell about my family and not about the holocasut.. i choose people/ you can about your family.. i will like it better // i dont really understand this and its really about. you can be friend with a jewish girl if she is mentioning the holocaust..curios to know this//

        Comment by meirav kaye — January 22, 2016 @ 7:30 pm

      • And among the 20 million dead Krauts,let’s recognize a couple groups. The 25,000 that lost their lives,when we bombed Dresden back to the Stone Age. The second group being the victims of the savages that were part of the Red Army. Wholesale rape and murder when the Ruskies entered Berlin.Why didn’t any of those red bastards ever stand trial. I got 10 bucks says Ike knew about that shit. That’s why no one was ever prosecuted for the Berlin incident. No it’s always about the Jews . I don’t think they’d give 2 shits about the innocent people in Dresden,that had the living shit bombed out of it.

        Comment by Tom — February 25, 2016 @ 11:20 pm

        • Germany has a memorial in Berlin which has a cross in honor of the Russians and a memorial to Coventry. You can read about it on this blog post:

          Comment by furtherglory — February 26, 2016 @ 5:31 am

          • The Ruskie memorial is sick. I like what part of the inscription says. “Fell in the struggle against German fascist “. WTF ! That is a joke,right? Look who’s calling the kettle black. That’s a slap in the face to all the men women and children ,who were sexually assaulted and murdered by those Godless,sons of pigs. I can however take solace in the fact,that all those sick Ruskie mongrels,are now Satans whores. I thought Germany only kissed the Jews ass. Now I see they kiss the ass of the Russian pigs. Oops. My bad. I’m insulting pigs now. The Ruskies no longer have a claim on Berlin . Tear that damn memorial down. Erect a memorial to the innocent folks of Berlin,that were brutalized by the savage Ruskies. From where I sit,the Reds have no place in a polite society.

            Comment by Tim — February 26, 2016 @ 7:26 am

            • Again, you nailed it, Tim. Nothing like a good cup of coffee and A FRANK, GUN-BARREL STRAIGHT DISCOURSE – sets the mind aright! I applaud your most excellent and honorable suggestion – and would like to add TO REMOVE ALL U.S. presence in Europe. I think we’ve done enough damage to THAT continent! If you want a taste of THE MYTH OF GERMAN VILLAINY, It’s in audio format on YouTube – where I narrate the Book covers and preface – those alone certainly sell the book! It sounds like you’ve done some reading yourself and are vitally initiated in the argument (on the right side, in my opinion). Thank you for your contributions.

              Comment by Diane King — February 26, 2016 @ 7:31 am

              • Works for me. Get all our service personnel out. We had such a hardon for wanting to bring the Reds down,we should’ve told them to “start stepping”,when it came to Berlin. Don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. I don’t see where we were to concerned about helping Germany get back on her feet,by allowing the Reds to stifle her citizens. While we’re at it,let’s get out of NATO. That’s one of the biggest pu–y whipped organizations in the world. They’re as bad as the UN. Can’t fart on foreign soil without their consent. The German folks are never gonna be able to identify themselves as individuals as long as there is Jew and Ruskie influence in the country. Somewhere in Japan is a memorial of sorts to Hedeki Tojo. Could you imagine what would happen if the Krauts tried to erect a memorial to hitler?

                Comment by Tim — February 26, 2016 @ 8:26 am

                • Again, you’re dead on, Tim. US involvement wasn’t about getting Germany ‘back on their feet’. You’d be amazed at the women who were doing a kind of bucket brigade removing debris from each of the bombed cities. They were attempting to get THEMSELVES back on their feet. But from the beginning, they were beaten down by the ‘inglorious Allies’, from the Soviets in the East and the Western Allies in the West. They are still being beaten down and the criminals seemingly scott free, but not really. One more thing. “Krauts” and “Nazi’s” are derogatory jewish terms. Maybe we could avoid using them. Otherwise, you are DEAD ON! Kudos.

                  Comment by Diane King — February 26, 2016 @ 11:26 am

          • FG. When I try to hook up with the link you provided in this response,it don’t take me to the link. A page pops up that wants me to “sign in”. Never had that happen before. What’s up with that?

            Comment by Tim — February 26, 2016 @ 8:32 am

        • Thank you, Tom for your very correct comments! And you absolutely nailed it!!! Except that there were more likely 350,000 (probably 500,000) Germans alone incinerated in Dresden. And you are right about Eisenhower and his hatred of the Jews as he was responsible for the murder of nearly 2 million POWs in his wretched Eisenhower Camps. Totally agree about the heinous behavior of the Red Army in their march to Berlin. Truly, also perhaps their worst crime was their co-fabrication of the holohoax story, as the so-called ‘death camps’ were in the Soviet zone and we didn’t have access to them for TEN YEARS! I’m fully prepared to accept a WAR CRIMES TRIAL to try the Allies even postmortem. Fortunately, in the Lord’s economy, HE is in the business of righting the wrongs in his time. And yes, finally, it IS all about the Jews! You might be interested in Benton Bradberry’s concise NO HOLDS BARRED book THE MYTH OF GERMAN VILLAINY. Here is an interview Jim Rizoli had with him on YouTube

          Comment by Diane King — February 26, 2016 @ 7:20 am

        • I have corrected the link to the Memorial Site:

          Comment by furtherglory — February 26, 2016 @ 8:42 am

          • Much better. Thank you. This leaves me with another question. This is a is a place in human history,that has outright lies and conjecture in it. If people truly want the Krauts to heal from the f–king they got at the end of WW2,is this really such a good idea to have this memorial? I feel bad saying this,but hasn’t Germany kissed the Jews ass enough? I figure the only way German citizens can ever identify with themselves ever again,it has to be free of outside influence. The state of Mississippi still has the confederate flag on their state flag. The confederate flag is not about hate. It’s about heritage. Let’s the people of Mississippi remember the men who fought and died for the state back in the civil war. It lets those folks know who they are. Now I’m not saying the Krauts should be allowed to fly the swastika,but they need to be free of confusing,outside influence. You have the Jew memorial,it ain’t gonna happen. I don’t even see where Germany was allowed to decide her own future. This shits,one situation that needs to get unf–ked. Let the Krauts decide their future,without outside forces making them feel like scum of the planet.

            Comment by Tim — February 26, 2016 @ 9:18 am

  4. The Zionists jews are using the holocaust lie for really bad things. This “cabal” is coming to an end.

    Comment by Dave Richter — January 12, 2016 @ 9:35 am

  5. “most of the memoirs and reports of Holocaust survivors are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…”
    –Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950,
    Vol. 12, p. 65

    Comment by Joe Rizoli — January 12, 2016 @ 12:02 am

  6. The makeup of the commissars and elite in Soviet Russia were predominantly Jews.

    Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 12:54 pm

  7. Do youself a favor if you really want to get the straight dope on World War One World War 2 read Ben Bradberry’s book The Myth of German villainy in fact just was speaking to him today as we have also done a video Interview with him. It is the best book you’ll ever read about World War One World War 2 and the Holocaust in general.

    Comment by jrizoli — January 11, 2016 @ 11:37 am

    • Awesome book. Also heard his interviews. But the book is mandatory reading.

      Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 3:49 pm

  8. Anonymous – there have been many communist Jews –

    Comment by Les — January 11, 2016 @ 1:08 am

    • Jüdischer Bolschewismus was a term the Nazis used (for propaganda purposes).

      In some of his speeches, especially in the late ’30s and early ’40s, Father Coughlin attempted to document/publicize how many of the leading figures in the USSR were Jews — some changed their name (to disguise the fact?), eg Trotsky’s real name was Lev Davidovich Bronshtein.

      Comment by eah — January 11, 2016 @ 8:30 am

      • EAH. During the last years of Tsarist rule all comunist leader had a nickname which then became their official name. Lenin – Uljanov, Stalin – Djugashwilli, etc.
        That anti-Semit Coughlin had been simply a hate sprayer of dammned memory.
        At any rate Stalin purged – murdered – party leaders with Jewish ancestry, started discrimination of Jews already at end of twenthies, with the August 26, 1939 with Nazi Germany made outbreack of WWII possible, and after war too purged Jewish comunist leaders in satellite states (Slanski and others, etc.).
        Seat down and study history of real events and about real figures instead to believe to the words of hate sprayers.

        Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 11, 2016 @ 10:05 am

      • anti-Semit Coughlin

        I don’t think Father Coughlin was an anti-Semite — just saying which Soviet leaders were Jews is not anti-Semitic — he often connected this with Soviet persecution of Christians — at the link from Les it says this: The Judaic Bolsheviks regarded politics as a branch of Gentile pest control. Hatred of Christians, especially the peasant “bourgeoisie” was their prime motivation. The systematic destruction of the Christian peasantry of Russia as so many vermin, beginning with Lenin’s attack on them in the summer of 1918 and his forced starvation in 1921, has been almost completely ignored in Western history — this was Father Coughlin’s main point: that compared to the Nazi persecution of Jews, the persecution of Christians by the Soviets, many of whom were Jews, received almost no attention — I have listened to many of Father Coughlin’s speeches, and agree with you in the sense that he often went somewhat too far in trying to equate Nazism with what he called “anti-Communism” — or saying that Nazism was ‘a defense against Communism’.

        Comment by eah — January 11, 2016 @ 2:22 pm

        • EAH, Indeed, some Vatican circles hoped to use Nazism as a defence against Comunism and, in 1941, to send missionaries following the Axis troops in Russia.

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 11, 2016 @ 11:03 pm

    • Stalin was married to a Jewish woman.

      Comment by The Dude — January 11, 2016 @ 7:22 pm

      • THE DUDE. A Jewish woman or only with Jewish ancestry? Here too we have the question WHO IS A JEW.
        Here I recall that it seems that so Antonescu, nazi-fascist dictator of Rumenia as Pavelic, nazi-fascist dictator of Croatia had wiwes with Jewish ancestry. So Antonesdu as Pavelic strongly persecuted the Jews.

        Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 12, 2016 @ 12:11 am

  9. My great uncle Moses worked in the post office at Auschwitz, and he used to read some of the postcards that the inmates sent to their relatives. One cheeky little Jewish whipper-snapper had written to his mother-in-law, saying “Having a wonderful time in the camp – wish You were here.”

    Comment by Talbot — January 10, 2016 @ 8:32 pm

    • TALBOT. This comment is almost cruel and unworthy.

      Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 11, 2016 @ 1:15 am

      • @Wolf Murmelstein

        On the contrary – it is well past time that people poked a little fun at the Auschwitz myth. By doing this, we are not showing disrespect or any cruelty towards those who genuinely died there, or who suffered trauma and separation from their families. What we are doing is pouring scorn on the Auschwitz authorities, the Polish and German governments, and the entire holocaust industry, who between them are perpetrating the most monstrous fraud on what went on there during WW2. In addition, we are mocking those so-called fake “survivors” – and others – who are making money out of this gigantic hoax by concocting the most lurid, horrific, and absurd stories imaginable.

        Comment by Talbot — January 11, 2016 @ 8:16 am

        • The Jews mock us who don’t fall for their fantasy stories.
          How stupid do you think we are?

          Comment by jrizoli — January 11, 2016 @ 11:19 am

          • RIZOLI. You are not stupid at all having got a position in the Shoah Business.

            Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 11, 2016 @ 1:10 pm

        • TALBOT. The Polish authorities turned the Auschwitz camp in a tourist atraction after having changed things on the remains. In 1992 I worked with the Italian member of the Auschwitz Comitee on a declaration calling for an international status in order to assure silence and respect on this place of horror.

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 12, 2016 @ 12:16 am

          • I have been to Auschwitz twice — once in 1998, and once in 2005. In 1998, I was the only person there, except for my private tour guide. In 2005, I went there by myself and the place was filled with tourists, many of them Jewish tourists.

            Everyone there was laughing and talking, including the Jewish tourists who were having great fun. There was “no respect for this place of horror”. The Jews were very happy that they now rule the world — by virtue of the Holocaust.

            Comment by furtherglory — January 12, 2016 @ 6:16 am

            • FURTHERGLORY. Jews do not rule and never ruled the world. You should rather consider the great power Arab and Chineese finance is holding nowadays while Islamic extermism is planning a new extermination first of the Jews and then of the Christians. Think better about the meaning of the Paris attacks.

              Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 13, 2016 @ 12:46 am

              • Wolf said: “FURTHERGLORY. Jews do not rule and never ruled the world. You should rather consider the great power Arab and Chinese finance is holding nowadays while Islamic extremism is planning a new extermination first of the Jews and then of the Christians. Think better about the meaning of the Paris attacks.”

                Good grief. Talk about a superficial casual view of world events. Wrong again. Future Glory, Jim Rizoli rule the day. Islamic ‘extremism’ serves jewish interests by creating a villain to jewish ever-present whining mantra of victim status. Justifies ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians and/or anyone else they wish to dispose of – Iranians, Iraquis, ad nauseum. So, to coin the addage, “the U.S. opens up a can of democracy on their doorstep” (those israel targets) and we destroy them…. 5000 children died in Iraq – that’s the cry of our foreign policy – WOMEN AND CHILDREN FIRST. Nope, not the arabs, not the muslims, though they are a problem within our borders, but how did they get there? The GOLLUM for the jews…. but I digress…. actually I don’t. These are the results of the power of the holocost, the boot at our neck.

                Comment by Diane King — January 13, 2016 @ 10:34 am

          • Obviously you have made sincere efforts, Dr. Murmelstein, in attempting to turn Auschwitz into a place of respect and reverence, but I don’t think you are going to have much success in achieving that kind of status for the place. The last I heard, is that the sinister cosmetics billionaire – Ronald S. Lauder, who is the big cheese who runs the World Jewish Congress – wants to take over Auschwitz and pour lots of money into its re-development into what I fear will be a glorified, grotesque Theme Park.

            Comment by Talbot — January 12, 2016 @ 7:23 am

            • I don’t know what it is with people and their obsession with death is just like 9/11 and what happened to New York people of all religious faiths have to have the memorials. When it comes to the Jews they have many such Holohoax Memorial All over the world and they used taxpayers money to pay for these horror Disney lands.
              What would the Jews do without being victimized without thinking that they were slaughtered for their religious views which I don’t understand because most of the Jews say they are atheist. That has to be a good horror show for them to exist and they have plenty to lean on with all their priests and priestesses who go from school to school educating the poor children on what it was like to be in a work camp in survive. Horrors upon horrors they survived a work camp.

              Comment by jrizoli — January 12, 2016 @ 7:30 am

              • Exactly. Numerous victims, even 20 million Germans dead, but THEIRS is the only one that counts. Though the jews would like it to be the case and have done everything to make it so, but I’m here to say, IT’S NOT ABOUT THEM.

                Comment by Diane King — January 12, 2016 @ 9:07 am

                • You are exaggerating the number of German dead.
                  Approximately 6.6-8.8 millions died, these number include military and civilian.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 12, 2016 @ 9:34 am

                • The cumulative total of the firebombings on civilians alone numbers in the millions. The slaughter by the Soviets as they marched through the Reich, even more, let alone the soldiers killed. I’d learned about 6 million German soldiers were killed DURING the war, let alone those murdered by the allies in the Eisenhower camps and sent to the Soviet Union. There’s always an attempt to dumb down the German numbers so as to marginalize and minimize their suffering. 20 million is a conservative figure.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 12, 2016 @ 9:46 am

                • Uh oh, you just gave the magic number:
                  6 million.
                  Ding ding ding ding, give the lady a prize!!!!!!!!
                  The highest number of civilian dead during the bombings that I’ve seen is 600,000.
                  The number of military deaths I’ve seen is around 5 million, give or take. The highest number of ethnic Germans that died during expulsion is around 2 million.
                  It really depends on who is researching.
                  I’d say on the high end the number is close to 9 million and that is based on the highest estimates I’ve seen.
                  There were around 67 million Germans at the time of WW 2. There is no way 20 million died.
                  Not a chance.
                  BTW, this is not to minimize German suffering during and after the war. The way the ethnic Germans were driven out is a disgrace.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 13, 2016 @ 7:02 am

                • Yet 6 million magical appearing Gooz died….LOL Why don’t you talk about that number?
                  Honestly I’m not a very big believer of all these high figures as there really is no way of proving them….but the 6 million disappearing Goooz is etched in stone for eternity even though they know it’s not even close. Like Norman Finkelstein mother said if so many Jews survived then who died?
                  The real reason for the high 6 million number is they were pulling an insurance scam and the more people they could have in the pot the more money they made and guess what that insurance fraud fund has done very well over these last 75 years.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 13, 2016 @ 7:32 am

            • TALBOT. I should like to know more about such a project. Could You help? Unfortunately my friend Emilio Foà – of blessed memory – passed away just in 1992.

              Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 12, 2016 @ 9:12 am

              • Wolf Murmelstein. Unfortunately, I can’t remember where I read about Ronald Lauder’s proposed plans for Auschwitz – I’ll have to search round the Internet and let you know if I find anything more about it. I do remember, though, that the Auschwitz authorities were finding it difficult to raise the necessary funds to keep the two sites from decay and dilapidation, and his name was mentioned as a benefactor who would pump funds into the restoration and re-development.

                Back on the 70th Anniversary of Holocaust Memorial Day, I did note that it was he who led the key-note address to the assembled former inmates and guests. He mentioned that Auschwitz must not be allowed to fall into decay or be forgotten. But he also said that he wants “Hate Laws” and “Holocaust Denial Laws” introduced into EVERY country around the world – and that to me makes him appear as if he has got a very sinister project that he wants to pursue.

                Comment by Talbot — January 12, 2016 @ 10:35 am

                • Hi Dr Murmelstein. If you type in “Auschwitz Ronald S Lauder on Google, you can then page up the first item on the list which gives news from the official Auschwitz Memorial Museum website.

                  There is some information about him there, and his role as a major benefactor of Auschwitz.

                  Comment by Talbot — January 12, 2016 @ 11:04 am

              • 20 million: They are a highly cultured, highly civilized people in every respect. When studied objectively, even Germany’s leaders of the 1930s and 40s were not very different from other European leaders. They were only made out to be different by the relentless hate propaganda directed against them. Germany suffered more than any other country by far as a result of World War II. Some 160 of her largest cities and towns were completely destroyed by the Allied bombing campaign and perhaps as many as 20 million Germans lost their lives as a result of the war. Yet, no one wants to hear their tales of suffering, and no sympathy has been allowed the defeated and disgraced Germans. (B. Bradberry, THE MYTH OF GERMAN VILLAINY.)

                Comment by Diane King — January 13, 2016 @ 10:36 am

                • Diane, if you would be so kind:
                  At the end of that paragraph there should be a citation. If you look in the back of the book (or it could be at the end of the chapter) the author should list what documentation he using to get that information. Could you tell me what documentation or books he is using?
                  Thank you.
                  Just give that information on one of the newer posts. The text is starting to really stretch out when I read this on my phone.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 13, 2016 @ 3:18 pm

                • Jeff, I did, referencing Benton Bradberry’s THE MYTH OF GERMAN VILLAINY. However, it wouldn’t matter what I put as a reference. You don’t give heed to such whether “Further Glory” posts or JRizoli or any of us. But, specifically, Bradberry’s book:

                  1) A separate clause barred Austria form combining with Germany. During the peace deliberations, Georges Clemenceau, President of France, is supposed to have said, “Germany has 20 million too many people.”Germany not only did not want war in the beginning, but put out peace feelers as early as 1916 to try to bring the war to an end, even though Germany appeared at that time to be about to win the war, but the Allies had no interest in bringing the war to an end. What the Allies wanted was to destroy Germany, as they had set out to do from the beginning, and so, Germany’s peace feelers were ignored. Clearly Germany was the victim and not the perpetrator of aggression.

                  2) They did not want peace with Germany. They wanted to destroy Germany. That is also what International Jewry wanted. It is estimated that more than 8 million Germans died during the war, but an astonishing 13 million additional Germans died after the war was over; the result of expulsions, mass murder, brutality, exposure and starvation. That would be a total of more than 20 million German deaths as a result of the war. The estimated deaths during the war for the United States and Great Britain were 413,000 and 450,000 respectively. The claim that 6 million Jews died at the hands of the Nazis is patently absurd.

                  The book is amazing.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 13, 2016 @ 7:46 pm

        • Right on! This is the only event in history protected by law in several countries. Why? Truth fears no questions,right?

          Comment by Dave Richter — January 12, 2016 @ 9:32 am

          • Exactly, Dave. IF they are so certain about their position, why not allow discussion? Because they aren’t secure, knowing investigation will unravel their lies. I’ve heard it described as being told that Disney World is the way all Americans live – it’s reality but not being allowed to take a closer look. We must believe what we are told. Frankly, I’m not prepared to do that.

            The same people who have been lying to me about the Lord’s Resurrection are the same ones who hide the truths about 9-11, the JFK assassination and ESPECIALLY the holocaust myth.

            Comment by Diane King — January 12, 2016 @ 9:50 am

            • So, the author of the book has no reference for how he got the numbers he is using of 20 million dead Germans.
              Is the author related to MS King by any chance?
              Why would Germany make a peace proposal in 1916 if they were winning? Wouldn’t it make more sense to win and dictate the peace?
              The British counterattacked the Germans in 1916, driving them back in several places. So, they weren’t really winning.
              I’m not going to read the Myth of German Villainy.
              For one, Mr. Rizoli recommended it.
              I’ve read two books at his suggestion, both of which were crap. It’s time I’ll never get back.
              More importantly, however, I actually have to buy it.
              The Holocaust Handbooks are free and the “Bad War” was included in my Prime Membership so I didn’t pay for it.
              I did notice that the book is like 3.00 on Amazon. It’s still over priced.

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 14, 2016 @ 1:36 pm

              • It appears you wish to revel in your ignorance or should I say flounder.

                It’s never been a German intent to dominate England and yes, the Germans had the military advantage in both wars with England, offering numerous peace initiatives, both received with the traditional England thumbing its nose…. a warmongering gesture, to say the least.

                It’s your loss to not read The Myth of German Villainy. Again, unfortunately even languishing in willful ignorance.

                Comment by Diane King — January 14, 2016 @ 2:25 pm

            • I bet they’re the same people who have been lying to you about the Easter Bunny too.

              Comment by Anonymous — June 8, 2016 @ 6:37 pm

            • Not to mention the Tooth Fairy.

              Comment by Anonymous — June 8, 2016 @ 6:37 pm

    • Enjoyed your comment. “Wish you were here.” Perfect.

      Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 3:38 pm

      • DIANE KING. At Hell You will be properly greeted and “handled” by former SS guards employed for their professional experience as Devils.

        Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 12, 2016 @ 12:18 am

        • Since you mentioned it: “DIANE KING. At Hell You will be properly greeted and “handled” by former SS guards employed for their professional experience as Devils”.Wolf, the only way any of us will be separated from God in hell will be to reject Jesus Christ and HIS work on the cross. And I think you are a provocateur, Rather than engaging in legitimate discussion, you attempt to outrage and provoke. No doubt, many SS were godfearing people. You can continue to misrepresent them any way you like. The truth will out as it is here on this forum with all but you and Jeff K.

          Comment by Diane King — January 12, 2016 @ 9:00 am

          • DIANE KING. First lesson of history for You. Every SS man had leave his former church and belong to the DEUTSCHE CHRISTEN who rejected the Old Testament and denied the Jewish birth of Jesus Christ. In this way they could be better trained to perform their cruelties. Further tuition to You and Rizoli will be granted once in the hell. As You and Rizoli clearly regret my survival I can reply as I like.

            Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 12, 2016 @ 9:21 am

            • Quit whining, Wolf. We don’t regret your ‘survival’. YOU SURVIVED!! What are you complaining about. Wouldn’t you like to realize that less of you died than feared? That instead of 6 million, that MAYBE 300,000 for all causes during war time, especially disease? That you could collectively say, “It could have been worse”? Again, we are being inundated and prosecuted (18 countries) for trying to discuss this issue. WE are the true victims of this myth…. NOT YOU.

              Comment by Diane King — January 12, 2016 @ 9:52 am

              • See how they deal with me on the radio….Still waiting for their invitation to discuss the topic more on a separate program dealing with the Holocaust issue….zzzzzzz

                Comment by jrizoli — January 12, 2016 @ 11:23 am

  10. I think I’m gonna write a fake ‘Holocaust’ letter too, but a letter claiming there were no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz. I wonder if the USHMM will be happy to get my ‘letter’ too… 😉

    Comment by hermie — January 10, 2016 @ 11:22 am

    • If you live in any of the 19 countries that have a Holocaust denial law, you could wind up in prison for 5 years or more.

      Comment by furtherglory — January 10, 2016 @ 11:35 am

      • Not if i become Schlomo Levy, the New Yorker and former Sonderkommando who kept silent so far but now wants to tell the world his job was the cremation of epidemic corpses and nothing else.

        Comment by hermie — January 10, 2016 @ 2:37 pm

        • HEMIE. Both Your comments here are only cruel and out of place.

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 11, 2016 @ 1:19 am

          • Have a break, crybaby…

            Comment by hermie — January 11, 2016 @ 1:36 pm

  11. At the end of the televised story, the newsreader announced that the USHMM is “hoping more artefacts (like that letter) will be donated after they’ve heard this story by Frank Grunwald.”

    Oh, good heavens! – this to me sounds like an open invitation to all kinds of fabricators and fraudsters to start writing, digging-up or manufacturing, loads of old fake postcards, letters, junk and tat for presentation and propaganda purposes in their wretched museum.

    I have no doubt that once all this stuff starts to arrive in Washington, then the museum management will plead to the US government to donate plenty of taxpayers money to pay for a brand new giant hall where it can all be shown to the general public. Admission, of course, will not be free – but normal commercial prices will apply. US visitors will thus be paying twice to view these fake artefacts. Isn’t that a wonderful heart-warming prospect, ladies and gentlemen?

    Comment by Talbot — January 10, 2016 @ 11:12 am

  12. Another bizarro tale but just think there are thousands upon thousands of stories like this that these Holohoaxers have been saying for the last 75 years. Of course we have the Dumbo goyim that will believe these stories so the lies goes on and on.
    Great article thanks for posting it.

    Comment by jrizoli — January 10, 2016 @ 10:22 am

  13. I express my doubts about that alleged letter. Even if the victim had the opportunity to write it how had the letter reached her relatives? A girl aged 12 normally had been selected for gassing unless the SS found her suitable for some experiments which granted little surviving chances. From Auschwitz only the inmates of the Familien Lager had been “permitted” – ordered – to send post cards to Theresienstadt; clearly to fool us. And only from Theresienstadt – not from the Polish Ghettoes – postcards had been allowed.

    Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 10, 2016 @ 10:09 am

  14. Germans are all vicious and cruel, especially me. I pride myself on it.

    Comment by Jett Rucker — January 10, 2016 @ 10:05 am

    • FURTHERGKIRY, RUCKER. The Nazis in their cruelty were very tricky toward persons of hated races like Jews, etc. The same when facing a Germal polical prisionier. Before the Nazi regime and after normal Germans are very kind. The Nazi doctrine of racial hatred turned normal persons into cruel criminals. I had been told by a German – we are now friends – how difficult it had been for him to turn into a normal person after war end.

      Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 10, 2016 @ 12:20 pm

      • I find that the Jews are the most racist hateful people on the face of this earth. The Germans were nothing compared to the Jews today.

        Comment by jrizoli — January 10, 2016 @ 12:39 pm

        • Really?
          The Nazis were an aggressive, expansionist, nationalistic party that wanted to eradicate the Jews from Europe, displace the Poles and Czechs from their homelands, eradicate the mentally and physically handicapped and allow millions of Ukrainians, Belorussians and Russians to die in artificially induced famines to feed Germans.
          A Nazi victory in WW 2 would have been catastrophic to the people in Eastern Europe.
          As it stands, 6 million Poles (3 million Polish Jews) and around 27 million Soviet citizens died.
          I’m glad the Germans treated FG nicely. That has no bearing in the way the Germans treated other people during WW 2.
          And Rizoli? You seriously need help. Your world view is twisted beyond belief.

          Comment by Jeff K. — January 10, 2016 @ 12:54 pm

          • You wrote: “And Rizoli? You seriously need help. Your world view is twisted beyond belief.”

            Keep in mind that Rizoli has done LENGTHLY interviews with experts like Germar Rudolf and Fred Leuchter. His “world view” is backed up by the experts. If he were a True Believer after talking to the experts, we would have to question his sanity.

            Comment by furtherglory — January 10, 2016 @ 2:35 pm

            • On a side note, it never occurred to me to click “About” at the top of your blog. I did.
              That’s an interesting story on how you decided on a name for your blog. I’ve always wondered why it was called “Furtherglory.”
              As for Rizoli, well……again you like him. I understand why.
              I think he and Carolyn Yeager should get along famously. Though Carolyn seems to get a little touchy, now and again.

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 10, 2016 @ 2:46 pm

              • JEFF K. I would like to see Rizoli and Carolyn Yeager married; would be a nice neo nazi couple. Of course Elie Wiesel to be invited to the Wedding Banquet.

                Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 11, 2016 @ 1:25 am

                • Deborah Lipstadt can be the Matron-of-Honor and David Irving can be the Best Man.
                  Hermie could cater.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 11, 2016 @ 9:30 am

                • wolf wrote: “Of course Elie Wiesel to be invited to the Wedding Banquet.”

                  …wearing this uniform:


                  Comment by hermie — January 11, 2016 @ 1:42 pm

                • No tattoo! So what?

                  Comment by hermie — January 11, 2016 @ 2:14 pm

                • JEFFE K., HERMIE. Of course Elie Wiesel at the banquet will kindly adress that couple.

                  Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 12, 2016 @ 12:22 am

          • The communist Jews are responsible for around 100 million people being killed not bad huh.
            And I need help?

            Comment by jrizoli — January 10, 2016 @ 2:48 pm

            • HEY!!!! Don’t you go insulting my people!!!!!!!!!!!!!

              I mean, er, um, what I meant was that yes, the Communists did win in sheer numbers but it took them almost a hundred years to get there. The Nazis did their damage in five. And started a world war to get there.
              That war killed almost 50 million Europeans. So, for the time involved the Nazis won.
              You should be proud.

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 10, 2016 @ 3:05 pm

              • Sad to say Hitler didn’t come close to eliminating as many of the Jews as he should have. Approximately 350000-500,000 Jews might have died during the war. But then we have almost 20 million Germans that were killed during the war and after the war yet nobody complains about that. Thry or outright slotted . So I guess Jewish lives are worth more than German lives or any other people’s lives. The Jews are good at two things they are good at lying and killing people, and blaming it on someone else.

                Comment by jrizoli — January 10, 2016 @ 3:28 pm

                • Now, Jim, we’ve talked about your unfortunate tendency to exaggerate the number of German dead.
                  Approximately 6.6 (oh crap, I said 6) to 8.8 million German dead. This includes civilian and military dead. I think the discrepancy comes from the possibility that up to a million German POWs died in the Soviet Union and the deaths that occurred during the expulsion of Germans from Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, etc. at the end of the war.
                  I know in your mind that Hitler didn’t kill enough Jews. You should rejoice in the fact that Hitler killed around 6 million Jews.
                  Rejoice, Jim. Hitler got as many as he could.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 10, 2016 @ 3:56 pm

                • Jeff, that’s unworthy of a discussion participant to be so nasty. The Soviet communists and revolutionary leaders in various European countries were largely jewish – it was known and understood, thus the concern. Also to suggest that Jim Rizoli would prefer all jews to have been killed and such would be willing to embrace the myth of the holocaust is also unworthy if this is a viable discussion. It seems that there were more jews collecting reparations after the war than were in the Reich. Must be the new CORE math.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 12:58 pm

                • Diane King:
                  I’m sorry I if offended you. My apologies.
                  However, on this blog I’ve been called a fucking moron, been accused of being a homosexual (which I am not), being a Jew (I’m not a Jew, the word is meant as an insult), being some type of half-assed Isreali cyber operative (which I am not) and otherwise insulted. Forgive me for my misbehavior.
                  However, I don’t think I am far off the mark on this. I think Jim would love the thought of all the Jews on earth vanishing overnight. Read his comments, tell me I’m wrong.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 11, 2016 @ 1:32 pm

                • Thank you. Not offended just think discussions should proceed with a certain decorum and protocol both ways. The burden of proof falls to us, who disagree with the Hollywood version of WWII. So we present our argument and the dispute isn’t with our argument usually but take on the form of character attacks against us for disagreeing.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 4:06 pm

            • How many communist Jews are there?

              Comment by Anonymous — January 10, 2016 @ 8:45 pm

              • The Communist Jews are responsible for 100 million deaths since 1900.

                Comment by jrizoli — January 10, 2016 @ 9:14 pm

                • That doesn’t answer my question of how many communist Jews there are.

                  Comment by Anonymous — January 10, 2016 @ 9:54 pm

                • RIZOLI. Stalin, an antisemite Pope, started the first discrimination of Jews in URRSS and purged – murdered – the party leaders with Jewish ancestry. Then, through the August 26, 1939 treaty, made possible the outbreack of WWII with all its victims. After war end discrimination of Jews in URSS and other Comunist states became tougher. What the hell do You know and say?

                  Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 11, 2016 @ 1:42 am

                • Most Jews are communist in their belief systems and that’s the truth. They started in the 19 hundreds the ruined every country they have been in by their liberalism and hate. It’s too bad Hitler didn’t destroy them all but maybe God will at some point in time because of the rebellion against him and all that is righteous and true.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 11, 2016 @ 6:45 am

                • I really don’t understand why you are a Holocaust denier, Jim.
                  It seems to me you would revel in the fact that Hitler murdered so many Jews.
                  Glorify it, even.

                  And Jim, most Jews are not and were not Communists. Of course there were Jewish Communsts but I hardly call them Jews after that. Most became nonpracticing as Communists are generally atheist.
                  Communism attracted Jews because it promised equality and non-discrimination.
                  But it attracted many different types of people for the same reason, especially among the working class.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 11, 2016 @ 9:39 am

                • I wrote a blog post about the end of World War I. Hitler blamed the Jews for the loss of World War I.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 11, 2016 @ 9:57 am

                • Hitler was wrong.
                  A combination of the US entering the war, the British blockade, bad harvests and simple war weariness doomed the Germans during WW I.
                  Not to mention the fact that German allies were a drain to them, not a benefit.
                  The German military realized they couldn’t win after Ludendorff’s offensive in 1918. Instead of showing courage and being honest with the German public they ran away like cowards, leaving the politicians holding the bag.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 11, 2016 @ 10:12 am

                • I wrote this blog post about Germany’s loss of World War 1:


                  Comment by furtherglory — January 11, 2016 @ 11:30 am

                • Jeff wrote: “Hitler was wrong. A combination of the US entering the war, the British blockade, bad harvests and simple war weariness doomed the Germans during WW I.”

                  The US entering the war to secure the Balfour declaration by Britain. (During WW2, Chaim Weizmann – who had been central in the coming of the Balfour declaration during the Great War – even proudly offered Churchill to do it again.) Or in other words, Hitler was right. Even if he used to blame it on Germany’s home Jews rather than on Zionist plotters abroad.

                  Comment by hermie — January 11, 2016 @ 6:22 pm

                • HERMIE. A lesson of history. USA entered WWI in April 1917 while the Balfour Declaration – actually not an official document but only a letter to Lord Rotschild – is of following November after UK forces had conquered Palestine. So Your comment turns out to be fully baseless.

                  Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 12, 2016 @ 9:34 am

                • The Balfour declaration didn’t come out of thin air, as if by magic. It was the result of an intensive work behind the scenes before it was published. The publishing of the Balfour letter was just the formalization of that agreement. Otherwise, Weizmann’s WW2 offer to a WW1 & WW2 insider like Churchill would have been ridiculous. And the predictable British conquest of Palestine didn’t come as a surprise. It was envisioned months before finally achieved. One can even say that Palestine was conquered by British troops to please the Zionists and demonstrate Britain’s commitment in the Zionist enterprise.


                  Comment by hermie — January 12, 2016 @ 11:43 pm

                • Coco the Liar!

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 13, 2016 @ 4:41 am

              • Hitler wasn’t in the business of extermination (or why would have have bothered with the Transfer Agreement at all or sending ANY to the East – just execute them where they stood). He WAS, and there is scads of info to support this, interested in getting them OUT OF THE REICH – thus supporting the sentiment – WHEN YOU HEAR WHAT DID THE GERMANS DO TO THE JEWS, YOU MUST FIRST ASK, WHAT DID THE JEWS DO TO THE GERMANS!

                Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 12:59 pm

                • DIANE KING. The Jew Walther Rathenau set up the logistic system that permitted Germany to fight for four years in WWI. Some Jewish scientists developped materials for the military Industry and there had been more than 20000 – twentythousand – Jewish soldier awarded with decorations for bravery on battle front, many of them deported to Theresienstadt and in September October 1944 to Auschwitz and gassed.
                  And no go to the hell.

                  Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 11, 2016 @ 1:22 pm

                • I wrote about Walther Rathenau on this blog post:

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 11, 2016 @ 1:32 pm

                • Wolf…..Gassed in those imaginary gas chambers….LOL
                  You should be a screen writer for Speilberg.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 11, 2016 @ 1:48 pm

                • Diane King:
                  “WHAT DID THE JEWS DO TO THE GERMANS?”
                  Not a lot, actually.
                  The Jews that suffered the most were foreign Jews, not German Jews. German Jews had a decent chance of survival if they had a German spouse.
                  The Germans did murder Jews where they stood in Eastern Poland, the Baltics, Belorussia and the Ukraine. The Eisatzgruppen, with the help of locals, shot a million Jews. The problem with shooting is that it is messy and stressful on the killers, not to mention highly public.
                  There is a man named Herbert Stolpman who posts here. He was a German who lived through this period. He mentions his uncles who served in Eastern Europe who heard about the mass shootings and were very disturbed by it.
                  The Germans turned to gassing because it is easier, less stressful and easier to conceal.
                  Let me ask you a question. Forced laborers from France and Eastern Europe were sent to the Reich. The Germans deported the Jews from France and other places to Poland.
                  Didn’t the Germans need the labor? How does this make sense to transport Jews across a continent? Why not transport them to Germany to where they were really needed?
                  One answer is, well, they didn’t want all of those Jews in Germany.
                  Ok, but why transport them anywhere? Isn’t that a waste? You can intern them in their native countries and make them work there. Why waste valuable transport sending them to Poland and then have to build them shelter and feed them in an area where food is an issue?
                  Why not wait until the end of the war?

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 11, 2016 @ 1:48 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “The Germans deported the Jews from France and other places to Poland. Why?”

                  Because their territorial eviction on a continental scale had been decided and proclaimed by the leaders of the Third Reich. So what would have been the point of not deporting numerous Jews to vast areas recently captured by victorious armies and located far away from the German sphere of influence? And there were many industrial activities for the the German war effort in Poland. Auschwitz was located closed to a coal field. Where there was coal, there were factories.

                  Jeff wrote: “Didn’t the Germans need the labor?”

                  They did. But they had millions of Gentile laborers available in the conquered countries of Europe. So they were able to both expel vast numbers of Jews AND use the Gentile Workforce of occupied Europe for their own war effort, as well as to use the Jewish Workforce in Eastern factories. I still fail to see the point of keeping in Germany and Western Europe many ‘unfit for work’ individuals of a people that had been singled out for a continental total eviction after the war anyway. Had the US decided to expel the Japanese Americans, it would have made sense for the US authorities to send large numbers of Japanese Americans to captured areas in Asia before the end of the war. And I don’t doubt for a second that Israel would dump many of its ‘disturbing Palestinians’ in any large Arab territory falling into its hands even temporarily. Once that territory recaptured, the local Arab leaders could easily claim that Israel in fact butchered all those Palestinians instead of helding them in concentration areas, and there is little Israel could do to show them wrong.

                  Jeff wrote: ” How does this make sense to transport Jews across a continent? ”

                  Question even more relevant: How does this make sense to transport Jews accross a continent in order to mass murder them in large gas chambers, while the same job could be done in smaller killing facilities dispatched where the Jews were? The secrecy thing can’t save the orthodox narrative from this inconsistency, as there existed crematory ovens emitting no smoke in those days and a few ovens at each small killing facility could have coped with the quite small numbers of cremations required to achieve that.

                  Comment by hermie — January 11, 2016 @ 7:11 pm

            • Jim, the Communists most responsible the number you gave were not Jews.
              Stalin was raised in the Greek Orthodox faith and was himself anti-Semitic.
              Mao Tse Tung-not a Jew
              Kim Il Jung-not a Jew
              Pol Pot-not a Jew
              So, I’m afraid you are way off.
              Better luck next time.

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 11, 2016 @ 9:45 am

              • Even some Israeli Jews find your distortions unacceptable, Jeff…

                “I find it unacceptable that a person will be considered a member of the Jewish people when he does great things, but not considered part of our people when he does amazingly despicable things. […] We mustn’t forget that some of greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish.” – Stalin’s Jews, Israel Opinion, 12-21-2006 (,7340,L-3342999,00.html)

                Comment by hermie — January 12, 2016 @ 5:53 am

            • I’ll make the question easier, how many Soviet Jews were there?

              Comment by Anonymous — January 11, 2016 @ 4:02 pm

              • Of those who ruled in Russia most of them were Gooz don’t know what else an I say.
                When the Jews move in there goes the neighborhood.

                Comment by jrizoli — January 11, 2016 @ 4:08 pm

                • There were at most 5 million Jews in the Soviet Union. How could they have been responsible for a 100 million dead?

                  Comment by Anonymous — January 11, 2016 @ 4:20 pm

                • Comment regarding 100 million dead as a result of communist action includes ALL communists – hungarian, chinese, soviet, etc. They constitute the leadership that fosters and promotes the communist ideology, death squads, wars, scorched earth philosophy. 100 million might even be a conservative figure.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 12, 2016 @ 8:50 am

              • 100 million people didn’t die in the USSR, Anonymous.
                Jim doesn’t know so I thought I would help him out:
                65 million in the People’s Republic of China
                20 million in the Soviet Union
                2 million in Cambodia
                2 million in North Korea
                1.7 million in Africa
                1.5 million in Afghanistan
                1 million in the Communist states of Eastern Europe
                1 million in Vietnam
                150,000 in Latin America
                10,000 deaths
                “resulting from
                actions of the
                communist movement
                and communist
                parties not in power.”
                I got this number from this website. It appears fairly accurate and the site itself gives additional numbers. I think what I posted is pretty accurate from what I know of the countries involved.
                Here is the site:
                I am wary of Internet sites to some degree but I think what I have is fairly accurate.
                Your welcome, Jim.
                Always happy to help.

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 12, 2016 @ 8:15 am

        • I don’t know how I got in the middle of this mess, who makes a child with a german women after he lost a wife and 5 children in auschwitz… no I can’t understand if you hate me for being a proud jew or you can think of me as a german because I love the germans and I think their become the best in the because of this disaster…

          Comment by meirav kaye — January 11, 2016 @ 4:25 pm

          • Germany learned the lesson of history and is following a policy aiming to avoid events occure again. At their times Adenauer, Strauss, Kiesinger, Kohl, behaved very helpufully. And Merkel is following that way. The trade conncection Germany-Israel is working very well. At Potsdam University there is now a Department for Jewish Studies. And I made the experience that German scolars study really the history of the Shoah while USA and UK authors show still great ignorance of European history and geography.

            Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 12, 2016 @ 12:40 am

      • Wolf, I posted this earlier:

        I think (and I am by no means an expert on Judiasm) that Jews can’t be tattooed and be buried in a Jewish cemetery. However I am sure that exceptions are made for those who were tattooed against their will, i.e. Auschwitz survivors. Wolf can either confirm or correct this.
        I’m just curious, what would be the right answer?

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 10, 2016 @ 1:28 pm

        • JEFF K. Those who had been tattooed at Auschwitz had to be honoured and respected.
          The nowadays tattooes are, more or less, pagan symbols and therefore forbidden. The burial of tattooed persons depends on the decision of the single rabbi.

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 11, 2016 @ 1:34 am

          • Thank you, Wolf.

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 11, 2016 @ 9:41 am

      • The alleged claim of racial hatred in Nazi policy is a tired fabrication. They recognized the danger the jews posed to their society and dealt with them.

        Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 3:41 pm

        • Diane King. A group of former SS guards now employed as devils are waiting for You at hell. So You will learn history. Besides, Nazis cried also against USA plutocrats.

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 12, 2016 @ 12:44 am

    • My late Great Grandad was German, and he was vicious and cruel. As an SS man, he would stand at the entrance of “The Road to Heaven” at Sobibor and drive the naked Jews along it towards the gas chamber with his whip. He would bellow fearsome oaths and lash out at them with complete abandon. He was even accompanied by a ferocious guard dog, and if the victims showed any reluctance, then he would command it with the words “Man – seize those dogs” and it would then pounce upon the poor unfortunates – attacking the testicles, and tearing the flesh from out of their buttocks.

      Oh, by the way, his favourite method of killing babies was to seize the infants from out of their mother’s arms and bash their skulls with full force against the exterior of the gas chamber wall.

      But you will now have to excuse me, ladies and gentleman, I’m very busy writing all this down in my book that I hope to get published and earn loads of money. There is even talk of Hollywood being interested in this true, horrific story of inhumanity, so – who knows – I might be getting a call from Steven Spielberg any day now!

      Comment by Talbot — January 11, 2016 @ 8:56 am

      • Talbot, I hope this is merely a display, an example of the ABSURD and bizarre and believing any and every story without question fed to us by the corrupted media. If so, I applaud you. If not, the narrative is ludicrous. To speak of one’s great grandfather, who may have been strict and demanding but there is NO WAY he drove people to ANY gas chambers because there weren’t any. The atrocities ascribed to Germans were clearly committed by the allies, especially the Russians who created (and committed) these horror stories. But if so, where in the world did you hear such a story???? You obviously weren’t there!!! To denounce one’s kin like this on the hearsay of someone else??? APPALLING.

        Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 12:47 pm

        • @ Diane King – please don’t be alarmed. I was trying to be humorous and ironic in response to claims that Germans were vicious and cruel. And of course they weren’t ! They were no better or worse than any other nationality or group of people who find themselves in times of conflict and trauma.

          The absurdly horrific tales that I mentioned above, alas, do in fact come from so-called survivors tales of both Treblinka and Sobibor. I’ve read all this in the past, and unfortunately one can read these crazy accounts even today. The “road to heaven”, “the smashing of babies skulls” and the “ferocious dogs that can tear flesh out of human bodies” are fully accepted in holocaust circles. I’m afraid so many young people have absorbed all this nonsense – and we must do what we can to enlighten them, and show them that the holocaust is not actually true, and seriously needs to be re-evaluated.

          I also agree with you about the atrocities carried by the Soviets (who may well have created some of these stories). It would appear that the Bolsheviks left all their humanity and compassion behind them as they ran amok across the Soviet Union during the 1920’s and 30’s.

          Comment by Talbot — January 11, 2016 @ 1:26 pm

          • I wrote about Treblinka on this blog post:

            When I visited Treblinka in 1998, I heard voices screaming: “Transit camp.”

            Comment by furtherglory — January 11, 2016 @ 1:44 pm

            • So you had doubts about the role of Treblinka even back in 1998, FG. I was still a believer until 2012, but after my visit to the former site then my illusions about it being a death camp soon melted away. It wasn’t just the small size of the former camp, or its situation close to a large industrial quarry, farmland and human habitation, but also the location of the other two camps – Sobibor and Belzec – which formed part of ‘Operation Rheinhardt’.

              All three camps stood close by “change of gauge” railheads, where all passengers and freight had to change trains anyway. So where better to place Transit Halts for your deported Jews and forced workers. At these camps the passengers could stretch their legs, use the toilets, change their clothes, get fumigated, have their heads shaved, and take a shower. Afterwards they were handed some bread and soup, before being selected as to which labour camp they were going to be sent on to.

              But I don’t believe that Treblinka was an entirely benign place however. I think the Nazis were using subterfuge to get the Jews to hand over their money, gold and jewels under the cover of removing all their clothes and taking a shower. They obviously didn’t get any of that back when they embarked upon the second leg of their journeys, and so one could make a reasonable claim that these were extortion centres as well as transit halts!

              Comment by Talbot — January 11, 2016 @ 3:39 pm

              • Talbot wrote: “But I don’t believe that Treblinka was an entirely benign place however. I think the Nazis were using subterfuge to get the Jews to hand over their money, gold and jewels under the cover of removing all their clothes and taking a shower. They obviously didn’t get any of that back when they embarked upon the second leg of their journeys, and so one could make a reasonable claim that these were extortion centres as well as transit halts!”

                German documents about Aktion Reinhardt were Crystal clear about that.


                Why would the Nazis have named that operation after German Secretary of State for Finances Fritz Reinhardt if no seizure of money and other valuables had been intended in the first place? Would have been nonsensical.

                Before talking about ‘extortion’ or ‘spoliation’, one should know that Jewish wealth was mainly the result of extortion and theft from Gentiles in the Nazis’ weltanschauung. So according to their standards and views, such a thing was a mere return of wealth to its rightful owners, or in other words economic justice.

                Comment by hermie — January 12, 2016 @ 7:01 am

                • Or simply a practical matter. After all, what use do the dead have for valuables?
                  The Nazi state made a healthy profit from the dead.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 12, 2016 @ 8:03 am

                • Jeff wrote: “Or simply a practical matter. After all, what use do the dead have for valuables? The Nazi state made a healthy profit from the dead.”

                  An explanation that could make sense too. But you still have to prove all those Jews indeed died there, or died tout court. Until that moment, both explanations are equally sensical.

                  Comment by hermie — January 12, 2016 @ 8:12 am

                • @Hermie. Thanks for the link to Robert Faurrison’s blog, where he clearly lists the purpose of Operation Reinhardt. Having read your own views here on FG’s website, I can understand where you are coming from when you say “Jewish wealth was mainly the result of extortion and theft from Gentiles in the Nazis weltanschauung. So according to their standards and views, such a thing was a mere return to its rightful owners, or in other words economic justice.”

                  Yes, from a National Socialist perspective, one can see why they wanted to reclaim that wealth for the Reich. Their belief was that International Jewry had conspired to prolong WW1 and bring about Imperial Germany’s defeat in order to established a Jewish entity in Palestine (and probably also to make a lot of money out arms manufacturing!). The Nazis were also furious with the Jews for fermenting revolution in Germany during the last few months of that war and in its aftermath (Hitler himself often referred to Germany being “stabbed in the back” by Jews and what he called “Internationalists”.) The behaviour of some Jews during the unstable and chaotic period of the Weimar Republic led to many German people regarding them – not exactly as the source of their woes, but a group of people who would eagerly take advantage of the turmoil to enrich themselves.

                  But of course, not all Jewish people could be included as “villains” who were trying to steal from Germany and undermine the nation from within. And therefore, it is debatable whether it was right and proper for the SS to confiscate literally every item of jewellery, and all of their money, in the name of economic justice. To my mind, justice can only be called that, when it is tempered with fairness and mercy. By stripping everyone of their worldly wealth and leaving them destitute in a new land far away from their original homes is not very humane – but there we are.

                  Comment by Talbot — January 12, 2016 @ 8:34 am

                • The goal of the Zionist plan was not only the establishment of “a Jewish entity in Palestine.” The state of Israel was/is meant to be the capital of a world under Jewish domination. Zionism is not the problem of Palestinians (or Arabs in general) only. It is the problem of any people wanting to remain free. (I’m talking about real freedom, not about the freedom to be good slaves of Almighty Jewry.) Zionism has become the main tool of Jewish messianic world domination, the geographical and political center of the Jew-owned New World Order. In the early stages of Zionism, the meaning of the Jewish ‘new Jerusalem’ was still debated and some Jews argued about the location of that new Jerusalem: Palestine or all the nations of the world. Since that time, the answer has became clear and is: both. In Zionism’s infancy, the most praticable solution to the Jewish problem/question was also debated. Herzl thought the establisment of a Jewish state in Palestine was the most praticable solution to the Jewish problem, while his colleague Max Nordau thought it was to be found in the obliteration of all the existing nations. From those days, the Zionist plot has evolved to a mixture of both solutions: i.e. the establisment of a Jewish state in Palestine AND the obliteration of all the existing nations.

                  Talbot wrote: “But of course, not all Jewish people could be included as “villains” who were trying to steal from Germany and undermine the nation from within. And therefore, it is debatable whether it was right and proper for the SS to confiscate literally every item of jewellery, and all of their money, in the name of economic justice.”

                  That’s precisely because of the Anglo-Saxon refusal to respond to an organized Jewish attack by an organized resistance that America and Britain are doomed to fail and to remain Jewry’s slaves.

                  And can an Anglo-Saxon, a Capitalist in essence, even understand the concept of economic justice? Can a guy believing that a wealthy man who has built his wealth on the exploitation and plunder of others, is necessarily a winner, even understand such things? The Anglo-Saxon brain is seemingly designed to understand Predatory Capitalism and nothing else. No surprise Anglo-Saxons regard the Jewish plunderers of the Weimar Republic as winners and the National Socialist reaction as an injustice utterly unfair and unbearable. Predatory Capitalism and hypocritical compensatory charity are part of their DNA after all. Savages…

                  Comment by hermie — January 13, 2016 @ 12:50 am

            • Awesome, Talbot. Most appreciated. I do enjoy sarcasm.

              Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 3:51 pm

            • That’s a rather poetic image, the voices of the dead speaking to you. You didn’t hear the whole message, it said:
              “Here the Germans forcefully transitioned us from this world to the next.”

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 12, 2016 @ 8:00 am

          • TALBOT. You are a good writer. The SS guards had been sent to perform all those atrocities after having got drunk. Then, the atrocities commited by English, Spanish, etc. conquerors ought to be recorded. These had been the effects of spraying doctrines of hatred and racism. In history, often high level doctrines had been turned into spraying of hatred and incitement of cruelty. And who is cruel with itself will be cruel with other people too.

            Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 12, 2016 @ 12:54 am

      • Seriously, thou, well done.

        Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 3:42 pm

        • Sorry, autocorrect is a little slow. Though …. well done.

          Comment by Diane King — January 11, 2016 @ 3:43 pm

          • I thought you wanted to keep this discussion on a polite level.
            Or does this only apply to me?

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 12, 2016 @ 8:04 am

            • I’m not in charge of this forum. I’d like it to be on the polite level, that’s all I meant. And sarcasm is still within the parameters. It doesn’t have to be nasty, though may be interpreted that way… it’s a higher form of humor. Don’t be so touchy.

              Comment by Diane King — January 12, 2016 @ 9:33 am

              • What, and this isn’t touchy?
                “But if so, where in the world did you hear such a story???? You obviously weren’t there!!! To denounce one’s kin like this on the hearsay of someone else??? APPALLING.”
                Talbot was spot on in his portrayal of how the SS treated the Jews at the Death Camps, even if he meant it sarcastically.

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 12, 2016 @ 9:48 am

                • The mistreatment of the Germans for the past 70 years is worthy of comment and ‘being touchy’. As I understand it, and based on this bogus SON OF SAUL movie, the Sonderkommandos or jews, Kapos ran the camps. The SS were overseers. The maltreatment was from other jews, especially kapos, but then there’s no surprise there.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 12, 2016 @ 9:58 am

              • You’ve been watching Jim’s videos again, haven’t you?
                You are mistaking Sondercommando with Kapos.
                Kapos were block leaders, picked among the prisoners themselves. This dates from the earliest Concentration Camps in Germany.
                The original Kapos in Auschwitz were ethnic Germans that the SS considered reliable. These included Communists and ordinary common criminals.
                The Sondercommando had their own “Kapos” but these men had very little power. The SS oversaw them.
                The SS ran the camps, the Kapos were under them and then the prisoners.

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 12, 2016 @ 10:26 am

    • You stuck on repeat?

      Comment by meirav kaye — January 21, 2016 @ 11:27 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: