Scrapbookpages Blog

January 18, 2016

95-year-old former medic at Auschwitz will go on trial soon in Germany

Filed under: Germany — Tags: , , , — furtherglory @ 8:57 am
The road to the gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau

The road to the gas chambers at Auschwitz-Birkenau

304FAFA400000578-0-image-a-14_1453144285784

The man shown in the photo above is Herbert Z. who will soon go on trial in Germany.

Update 01/18/1016:

The following quote is from another news article which you can read at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3405412/Former-Auschwitz-medic-95-dementia-stand-trial-deaths-3-600-people-Nazi-extermination-camp.html

Begin quote:

Although classed as a medic, such personnel at Auschwitz were not concerned with the health of inmates, but often poured in the Zyklon-B pesticide crystals into the gas chamber to murder them.

End quote

I can’t wait to learn how this will be proved in court in Germany.

Continue reading my original blog post.

A 95-year-old German man will soon be put on trial as “an accessory to murder” in Germany, the country formerly knows as Das Land der Dichter und Denker. He will be tried for his actions at the Auschwitz-Birkenau “death camp” during the 30 days that he worked there as a “medical orderly”.  You can read about it at http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35342821

Germany is now trying to make amends for murdering 6 million Jews during World War II, but they will soon be running out of old men to bring into court on a stretcher and charge with “being an accessory.”

The following quote is from another news article which you can read at http://www.dw.com/en/german-court-to-try-former-auschwitz-medic/a-18986981:

Begin quote

Prosecutors say the man – identified only as Hubert Z. under German privacy laws – was a medical orderly at the camp from August 15, 1944 to September 14, 1944.

During this time, 14 trains carrying prisoners arrived at Auschwitz-Birkenau, where many would eventually be murdered in the gas chambers.

“Given his awareness, the accused lent support to the organization of the camp and was thereby both involved in and advanced the extermination,” said prosecutors in an earlier statement.

The trial in the northeastern German town of Neubrandenburg comes after an appeals court overturned an earlier ruling that the elderly man – who reportedly suffers from dementia – was unfit to stand trial.

The trial is due to begin on February 29 and to run through March, although the sessions would be determined by Z.’s health condition.

End quote

The end of the mile long train tracks at Aushwitz-Birkenau

The mile-long train tracks at Auschwitz-Birkenau end at the International Monument

International Monument at Auschwitz-Birkenau

The International Monument in honor of the Jews killed at Auschwitz-Birkenau

The steps of the Monument lead to the ruins of the gas chambers

The steps of the International Monument lead down to the ruins of a gas chamber

The International Monuent

The International Monument is at the end of the former Auschwitz-Birkenau camp

My photos above, taken in 2005, show that there was a big difference between the thinking of the Jews and the thinking of the Germans.  The Germans would have called this monument an example of “degenerate art.”

Will this 95-year-old man be put into prison after he is automatically convicted?  No, of course not.  He will be sent to a nursing home where he can be with other criminals who formerly worked at a concentration camp, if any of them are still alive.

I predict that America will soon become the 20ieth country to have a Holocaust denial law. When that happens, I could be arrested, tried and automatically convicted because there is no defense against Holocaust denial.  If that happens, I plan to request to be sent to a nursing home in Germany.

545 Comments »

  1. Likewise, FG, allow me to email you or respond to dianekayking@hotmail.com. Thanks. D

    Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 15:30:17 +0000 To: dianekayking@hotmail.com

    Comment by Diane King — February 3, 2016 @ 1:59 pm

  2. I just added this comment to make the number of replies an even 500.
    Jeff

    Comment by Jeff K. — January 28, 2016 @ 12:53 pm

    • lol you beat me to it🙂

      Comment by srebrenica — January 28, 2016 @ 1:36 pm

      • This honestly might be some kind of record.
        The most I’ve seen is the low 100’s.

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 28, 2016 @ 2:15 pm

        • I’m still waiting for Jim to refute the statements on my link to perpetrator testimony lol

          Comment by srebrenica — January 28, 2016 @ 3:03 pm

          • I would not hold your breath waiting for that.
            😆😆

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 28, 2016 @ 3:15 pm

            • most of the memoirs and reports of Holocaust survivors are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…”
              –Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950,
              Vol. 12, p. 65

              Comment by jrizoli — January 28, 2016 @ 3:27 pm

          • Why should Jim take the time to present his case. You guys don’t read it or ‘listen’ to him anyway. Why should he waste the time! He’s already provided you with NUMEROUS citations, quotes, YOUTUBE videos and you blow it off. Same with me, though Jim’s the one ‘on deck’ now anyway.

            Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 4:20 pm

            • How much more can I say I think I presented my case very well.
              All the revisionist here have presented the case very well we are just dealing with nonsensical people who are trying to waste our timep.

              Comment by jrizoli — January 28, 2016 @ 4:34 pm

              • Absolutely. WE all have. Maybe our tactic should be to ‘ … answer a fool according to his folly’. Could be fun. (Whole verse is Proverbs 26:5: Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.) Or more truth to which they will respond as … folly!

                https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-rhGMCYWqKI and

                Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 4:45 pm

                • New Living Translation. Mat 7:6
                  “Don’t waste what is holy on people who are unholy. Don’t throw your pearls to pigs! They will trample the pearls, then turn and attack you.

                  Pretty much sums it up..

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 28, 2016 @ 4:51 pm

                • This is an interesting verse. Jesus is speaking and talking to people listening to him – jewish people, many who would become believers eventually. Referencing ‘swine’. Wonder who this is? The constant statement about ‘THE JEWS’. Who killed him? (They knew he was talking about them.) Swine was a forbidden ‘food’ to the jews…. interesting. I DO know, the PEARLS about which He speak are truths – in this case, historical truth about the holocost, for example. We contend to a point then move on away from ‘them’.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 5:36 pm

                • The Zundel trial blew apart the whole argument against the Holohoax. So if you want to see where it started to go downhill For the Holohuxsters This is where it went downhill. When you can blow apart a witness testimony in that case is done.
                  http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v08/v08p417_Faurisson.html

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 28, 2016 @ 6:29 pm

                • I wrote about the Zundel trial on this blog post: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/tag/ernst-zundel/

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 28, 2016 @ 6:56 pm

                • Then TRULY two great minds, one common thought:

                  http://zundelsite.org/8-foreign-summaries1.html

                  zundelsite.org

                  Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 7:10 pm

                • Most excellent FG…..

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 28, 2016 @ 7:14 pm

          • Srebrenica wrote: “I’m still waiting for Jim to refute the statements on my link to perpetrator testimony lol”

            And I’m still waiting for your refutation of my post about the banality of false confessions…

            Comment by hermie — February 2, 2016 @ 8:15 am

            • Was that the post where you ended ‘No answer required. Rhetorical…’ ?

              Comment by srebrenica — February 2, 2016 @ 12:06 pm

              • Yes, it was that one. The “No answer required. Rhetorical.” thing was only for the last question in that comment, the question about who decided that the words told by the Nazis who denied the ‘Holocaust’ were less probative than the words told by the Nazis who corroborated the victors’ narrative after the war.

                Comment by hermie — February 2, 2016 @ 7:32 pm

                • Any Nazi who would go along with the Allies version of what happened during the war were lying and they were just saying whatever they were told to say to protect themselves later on.
                  The Allies right from the beginning manipulated what happened especially dealing with the Homicidal gas chambers etc…They set the whole thing up To make it look like the Germans were carrying on with all these atrocities And that wasn’t the case at all The psych warfare department was sent into all the camps, they were the first ones there to make sure the story fit And then they brought the story out to the millions of people around the world. So what would you expect the Germans to say they had a go along with the story just to survive.

                  Comment by jrizoli — February 2, 2016 @ 7:42 pm

                • You are correct about the “psych warfare department.” I wrote about it on this blog post: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/alfred-de-grazia-commanding-officer-of-the-psychological-warfare-propaganda-team-attached-to-headquarters-of-the-us-7th-army/

                  Comment by furtherglory — February 3, 2016 @ 6:07 am

                • Again, you reject the truth, the Lord will send a delusion and THAT will be believed. The holocost is such a delusion.

                  Comment by Diane King — February 4, 2016 @ 2:09 pm

  3. To Diane and Jim:
    No offense, but I’m not really interested in the religious stuff.
    I understand you are both strong in your faith, I just don’t need the bible study. I’m not against any religion, I just don’t need it shoved down my throat. I’ve stopped reading any replies that I see bible verses.
    Again, no offense. Besides, I find the whole hate speech thing nauseating. Again, no offense.
    Jeff

    Comment by Jeff K. — January 25, 2016 @ 5:55 pm

    • Well, Jeff, we are all sharing our faith. We share our faith in the Lord and truth, you share your unfounded faith in the holocost. We will pause in sharing until someone says something then we will look at it as an invitation. So, back to talking about YOUR faith for now.

      Comment by Diane King — January 25, 2016 @ 7:12 pm

      • dianeking/jrizoli. First dogma of your so called faith is anti Semitism. So the second one is the denial of all Nazi crimes and third is the strict denial of the Shoah. In the deepest hell the Master Devils – former SS Judenjaeger/Eichmann&Staff – will show you what the Shoah really had been.

        Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 26, 2016 @ 1:48 am

        • Wolfe …..anti-semitism is not us hating Jews it’s jews hating us for telling the truth….
          In regards to the Nazis commiting crimes against the Jews we do acknowledge that some Jews were harmed there Is no doubt about that but they were not exterminated and homicidal gas chambers that is a complete fabrication and lie And in regards to the shoah the Holocaust
          The Holocaust is the biggest lie ever to come down the pike it only exists to extort large sums of money out of stupid gullible people that are afraid to speak out against a cult made up of fanatical bullies.
          The reason you are mad against us is because we are the only ones here that telling the truth.

          Comment by jrizoli — January 26, 2016 @ 5:56 am

          • jrizoli. The biggest lie had – orgin of almost all further lies leading to the Shoah – had been the DEICIDE ACCUSATION.

            Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 26, 2016 @ 8:08 am

            • Wolf ….no offense you talk in riddles…..but I showed you why you people are like you are…..you have been severely damaged.
              I would feel sorry for you but considering you act so hostile vindictive, treacherous, petty, malicious, to those who are trying to expose the lie you won’t get any tears from me.
              You are truly reaping what you sowed. That is a scripture from the Bible but being a Jew you don’t believe the Bible but still consider yourself a Jew…..Go figure.
              In breading has caused some big problems within your tribe…….History speaks for itself.
              http://www.timesofisrael.com/holocaust-toddlers-nearly-twice-as-likely-to-develop-schizophrenia/

              Comment by jrizoli — January 26, 2016 @ 8:20 am

          • The focus is ALWAYS what have the National Socialists done to the Jews. It’s like the woman who has been abused mercilessly and then finally snaps and takes matters into her own hands and strikes back. Some call that SELF DEFENSE. It might not be right, some is premeditated, BUT IT IS UNDERSTANDABLE!

            Comment by Diane King — January 26, 2016 @ 1:35 pm

        • Well, Mr. Wolf, we must have struck a nerve for you to go off on an irrational rant. You don’t know what we believe because you haven’t asked, suggesting you MIGHT NEED TO KNOW BUT DON’T WANT TO.

          I’m not antisemitic in that I don’t have a natural hostility towards the Arabs, who seem only interested in protecting their own lands… that is until the jewish cadre or should I say cabal stirred things up, making their homelands a powder keg. If a group of people occupy and dominate the key positions in your society and government, affecting even foreign policy and you mention it – it DOES NOT make you antisemitic, neither does EXPOSING THE CRIMES of the ‘chosen’ in this case either.

          Jesus exposed their crimes (THE JEWS) NUMEROUS TIMES. He even told the gullible people DON’T BE LIKE THEM. Also that not everyone who calls himself a ‘jew’ is one. There is also the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN. Also the Lord said, “because of you, the Gentiles curse Me”. Many jews got ‘saved’ and truly THAT’s the only way to avoid the eternal separation from GOD. There is no other way to GOD THE FATHER but through Jesus Christ and what He did on the cross. I realize THAT is also ANTISEMITIC for me to repeat what Jesus said of Himself: “I am the Way, Truth and the Life… no man cometh to the Father but by ME!)

          You brought it up, Wolf. YOU were shoving your damnable comments down OUR throats. I told Jeff we woulldn’t talk about our faith unless you guys brought it up. You brought it up.

          Comment by Diane King — January 26, 2016 @ 1:56 pm

          • Diane, I will answer you here about Adolph Hitler’s (and other leading Nazi figures) views on Christianity.
            I’ve read extensively about Adolph Hitler. I have a large library on WW II, plus I have Ian Kershaw’s epic biography on Hitler. I’ve read a lot of other books on Hitler. All the sources agree that he had a poor opinion of Christianity. The same thing goes for Goebbels and Rosenberg. Himmler discouraged members of the SS from joining churches because he thought it would make them “weak.”
            So, logically, I concluded that the Nazi party was hostile towards Christianity. Hitler hid a lot of this because he governed a Christian (Catholic and Protestant) nation. Nazi party attempts to exclude the churches from society always met with universal disapproval (and the Nazi Party did pay attention to public opinion) so these attempts were dropped.
            So yes, Hitler, and his entourage, did want to banish Christianity from German society, but gradually.
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 26, 2016 @ 2:39 pm

            • JEFF. Hitler wanted to bann Roman Chatolic Church after final victory. The Nazi doctrine spoke about a GERMAN CHURCH without the biblical commandments to follow; faith only in GREAT GERMANY and strict obeyance to the FUEHRER. For the SS men it had been compulsary to leave their churches and share the GERMAN FAITH, Such ideas had been already developped at the end of Middle Age. Needless to say that Germans had been supposed to rule over all other European populations and the Jews had to be exterminated. See the studies of Norman Cohn. Best,

              Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 27, 2016 @ 12:38 am

              • I’ve looked Norman Cohn on-line, Wolf. I will see if I can track down Europe’s Inner Demons and Warrant for Genocide. Hopefully I can find copies if the books are still print.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff — January 27, 2016 @ 6:36 am

                • JEFF. I refer to the book of Norman Cohn THE PURSUIT OF THE MILLENIUM where he quotes the so called HIGH RHINE REVOLUTIONARE – Oberreinscher Revolutionaer – who wrote the HUNDRED CHAPTERS BOOK. Cohn shows the evolution from the theories of a PERFECT SOCIETY into the mordern totalitarism. I read the German version-

                  Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 27, 2016 @ 7:46 am

              • Thank you for the suggestion, I didn’t pick up on that title. I will see if I can track down any of his books. The two I mentioned appeared interesting but I’ll try and find the one you suggested as well.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 27, 2016 @ 8:05 am

                • Holocaust Remembrance Day another day of LIES!
                  The day we Revisionist want to forget…but they won’t let us.
                  https://jan27.org/

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 27, 2016 @ 8:35 am

    • For the record….

      Comment by jrizoli — January 26, 2016 @ 7:59 am

    • This explains a lot of about you HoloHuxsters…..You have to be a little nuts to believe the way you do. But I did find out my answer.
      http://www.timesofisrael.com/holocaust-toddlers-nearly-twice-as-likely-to-develop-schizophrenia/

      Comment by jrizoli — January 26, 2016 @ 8:09 am

      • What does this have to do with me? Neither my parents nor my grandparents were Holocaust survivors.
        I didn’t read the article but I didn’t have to. Any adolescent or child that is traumatized is at risk of mental illness. That has nothing to do with “in breading” (it’s actually inbreeding).
        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff — January 26, 2016 @ 9:28 am

        • Jeff…..Just showing you some facts about a group of people (Jews) that have lost their way. Their inbreeding has destroyed all sense within them.
          Now they act as a Cult and the HoloHoax is their Religion, and they have some good followers as yourself. And you thought you weren’t religious.
          Here is their core beliefs…..

          Comment by jrizoli — January 26, 2016 @ 10:19 am

          • Jim, that quote is by a Catholic Bishop. What does he know about Judiasm?
            I’m also Catholic. I myself only know the basics about Judiasm. Which you trust me to teach you about Judiasm? Or Buddhism? Or Islam?
            Yes, yes, I know. There have been Rabbis who also said stupid shit about goyim. I’ve seen the quotes on this blog so you can spare me (that goes for you too, Hermie).
            So what does it prove?
            There are dumbasses of all races, religions and creeds. And gender. And sexual orientation.
            Forgive me, I’m a bit of a cynic. I’ve seen a great deal, heard the same stories, blah blah blah.
            I’m not a racist, nor am I prejudiced. Why? Because being an asshole is universal.
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff — January 26, 2016 @ 10:46 am

            • JEFF, jrizoli Williamson has left the Catholic Church for the Lefevrian PIUS X BROTHERHOOD. I sent him a question about the fate of the Nun Edith Stein through the Albano Center of the Pius X Brotherhood. Needless to say I did not get any answer.
              j.rizzoli. I note that a Negationist like you is a follower of the Lefevrian Pius X Brotherhood which is out of the Catholic Church. This is consistent with the Hilter aim to start persecution of Chatolic Church, obviously after final victory.

              Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 26, 2016 @ 12:44 pm

              • Rosenberg and Goebbels were fanatical anti-Christians.
                Hitler also disliked the various Christian Churches, believing their dogma inconsistent with the tenets of National Socialism.
                Hitler believed in a gradual approach, wanting to wean the German people off Christianity.
                Best wishes for your continuing good health, Wolf.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 26, 2016 @ 1:27 pm

                • Again, Jeff, you can’t infer or impute motive (especially about Adolf Hitler) when you can’t be objective and truly you have NO clue, erroneously making yourself the final judge in such matters. Thought you would enjoy this. Again, ANY catholic involvement in ANY political movement means NOTHING to me – just wanted you to see some of the things Hitler said – I find it interesting, not all conclusive.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 26, 2016 @ 2:03 pm

                • Comment by hermie — January 29, 2016 @ 9:13 am

                • What a sweet picture, Hermie. Hitler shaking that nice gentleman’s hand.
                  First, why should you care about Nazi attitudes towards the Christian Churches? You are an atheist and a rather intolerant one.
                  Second, the date on that quote is telling. He said that right after he took power. At that point he was still co-Chancellor and the Nazis were a minority in the cabinet. Why on earth would Hitler risk public opinion by picking a fight with the various Christian Churches at a time when Nazi power was still very tenuous?
                  BTW, I still need to track down my copy of Hitler’s Dark Charisma, when I do that I will tell you what page Rees talks about the Jewish officer. Also, the newspaper article you posted only discusses why Hitler received the Iron Cross, not the officer who recommended him.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 29, 2016 @ 10:14 am

                • Jeff wrote: “First, why should you care about Nazi attitudes towards the Christian Churches? You are an atheist and a rather intolerant one.”

                  A lie is a lie. Why shouldn’t I care about that one? By the way, your question is very telling of the fact that academic history is mere biased story writing and storytelling. You’ve perfectly integrated the methodologies of modern historiography, I see.😉

                  Jeff wrote: “Why on earth would Hitler risk public opinion by picking a fight with the various Christian Churches at a time when Nazi power was still very tenuous?”

                  No halfway between picking a fight with the Christian Churches and stating emphatically that Chrisitianity is foundation of Germany’s national morality???

                  Comment by hermie — January 29, 2016 @ 5:03 pm

              • You know, Wolf, I forgot about Edith Stein. Correct me if I’m wrong but she converted to the Catholic faith and became a nun…..and the Nazis still killed her.
                Wow, I guess Jim and Diane are wrong. It doesn’t really pay for Jews to convert to Christianity. The Nazis still felt that their “race” trumped any attempts at “saving their souls.”
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 26, 2016 @ 2:07 pm

            • Jeff, you said, “Jim, that quote is by a Catholic Bishop. What does he know about Judaism?” That’s rather arrogant and presumptuous of you to make such a claim. You don’t know him. You don’t have to be able to describe what’s going on in your society without knowing every detail about every person or group. There’s research. That’s why most of us have drawn the conclusions we have about the holocost – RESEARCH.

              Bishop Williamson has traveled extensively and dealt with people as extensively. He has been targeted by THE JEWS on a number of occasions, so he has been ‘up close and personal’. I know him and though I don’t think much of the catholic faith, I admire this gentleman immensely.

              Further, what we know about THE JEWS usually has NOTHING to do with the possible intent of judaism. We know what it is SUPPOSED to be like and truly, with the coming of Christ’s ministry, judaism should have morphed into Christianity and disappeared – so what is prevalent and present today IS AN ATROCITY.

              Comment by Diane King — January 26, 2016 @ 1:29 pm

              • I’m Catholic, Diane.
                What’s the matter with Catholics?
                Granted, I’m a lapsed Catholic so I don’t take it seriously.
                So, the Jews messed up, instead of remaining Jews they needed to turn into Christians, like, overnight? I guess all of the Muslims missed the train. So did the Buddhists. And the Japanese Shinto.
                So did all of the Native Americans but, hey, their turn came about a thousand years later.
                You’re right, I don’t know anything about this bishop. I know some things about, what I’ve read in line, that sort of thing.
                But, here’s the deal. You don’t know where he got his information, either. You agree with him because his ideas match your own. I’d hardly call you an unbiased observer. So, I think I’ll continue to believe he’s full of it. Frankly, I’m a bit ashamed that he is part of my former faith.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 26, 2016 @ 2:00 pm

                • JEFF. Richard Williamson had been a Chatolic priest and lecturer at a Seminary. It had been the group of Mons, Levebre and not the Pope to “promote” him. At a certain moment even the PIUS X BROTHERHOOD censured his views – those of the leaflet posted by jrizoli/dianeking – and his position is not clear. Think rather about the many Chatolic Priests, Monks, Nunns, lay people who in those Time of Darkness helped Jews to go in hiding or to reach safe heaven.

                  Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 27, 2016 @ 12:58 am

                • I do think of those that sheltered Jews during the war, Wolf. The Italians had a very good record for sheltering Jews, as did the Danes. The Pope sheltered Jews on his estates, the Italian Army often refused to turn Jews over and were horrified by what the Germans were doing, considering it barbaric. It was only after Mussolini fell were large numbers of Jews deported and this was only in areas the Germans controlled. I also admire the Poles who sheltered Jews because for them sheltering Jews was tantamount to a death sentence.
                  I think we both can agree that where Germans were in direct control Jews suffered more, especially in Eastern Europe. Initially German allies like Romania enthusiastically participated in killing or deporting Jews while Hungary and Bulgaria stayed out of it, only cooperating when they had to. It was always a delicate balancing act for them.
                  Have a good day, Wolf.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff — January 27, 2016 @ 6:48 am

  4. Jeff……yes I do agree with what you said about religions they are the problem behind most of worlds troubles but there is a truth out there It’s just a matter of people seeking it and applying what’s right in their lives.
    in regards to my pet topic the Holocaust The pro holocaust Huxster people out there are A problem
    among themselves Fighting against truth.
    Hard to believe you go along with their nonsense.

    Comment by jrizoli — January 24, 2016 @ 10:22 am

    • In spite of the whole pseudo-intellectual facade you sport, Jeff, you seem to be sincere and thus I concur with Jim’s comment that it’s a wonder you throw in with the holocostomania fetishism promulgated in seemingly every area of our society. You seem possibly a decent sort as well. Thus, throwing in with the holocostomania with its open victimization of dissenters seems inconsistent with the sense of fair play AND intelligence.

      Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 11:56 am

      • Thank you.
        That was a rather nice thing to say. I’ll ignore the bit about the pseudo-intellectual.
        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff K — January 24, 2016 @ 12:38 pm

    • Organized, mainline churches, I believe is the discussion – not TRUE believers of the TRUE FAITH. Those individuals were usually hunted down and killed by the ‘religious’ crowd, whether this murderous crowd be jews, catholics, crusaders… That’s not what it was supposed to be about. That’s not what God had in store for us.

      John 3:16: For God so loved the world that he gave His only Begotten Son that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish but have eternal life. THIS was the intent. THIS was the reason for the creation, for the Scriptures leading up to the birth of Christ, His arrival on earth, Emmanuel – God with us! (awesome) He lived, He ministered, he was betrayed, delivered to the Romans to be executed, DEMANDED HIS death, and he was crucified and died…. but that’s not ALL. HE AROSE!!! He conquered sin, death, the grave – but that’s not all. He ascended to the Father and IS COMING BACK.

      That’s the point of all this. HE’S COMING BACK. Will He find faith in the land when He returns? Will he find the kind of faith he found in the centurion, where He said, “I have not found such faith in all of Israel (and likely still hasn’t)” The kind of faith that understands HIS authority, HIS power, and coming TO HIM. That’s what I hope to facilitate – that people might come to HIM because of what I might say or even in spite of what I might say.

      The truth is out there and I want to share it with as many as I can. One way to know if something ISN’T the truth, check and see if the media and the politicians support it. If they do – there is something wrong ‘with this picture’. The truth has become a casualty especially in the realm dealing with WWII or anything having to do with Germans.

      Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 6:21 pm

  5. FG
    The former 95-year old Medic at Auschwitz going on trial in Germany is Hubert Zafke, you have previously shown his picture and name on one of your blogs, I believe it was during December. Nor is there any secrecy in not naming him

    Comment by Herbert Stolpmann — January 24, 2016 @ 12:31 am

  6. FG
    The former Medic at Auschwitz is Hubert Zafke, you have shown him previously on one of your blogs during December from memory, nor seems to be any sececy in withholding his name, see:http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/nazi-medic-hubert-zafke-95-stand-trial-over-auschwitz-massacre-1538605

    Comment by Herbert Stolpmann — January 24, 2016 @ 12:25 am

  7. Jeff is a rejecter of truth making him a rejecter of God. The Bible says not to bear false witness and people that reject the truth are doing just that.

    Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 7:45 pm

    • Also “bad company corrupts good morals (character)”. Hanging with the psychopaths that behave in a profligate manner to just about everyone else – synonym – PARASITE. I venture to say it’s NOT A GOOD THING!

      Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 8:01 pm

      • As are the Holohucksters here.

        “most of the memoirs and reports of Holocaust survivors are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…”
        –Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950,
        Vol. 12, p. 65

        Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 9:20 pm

        • Exactly, well put. All we can do is share what we know with them and leave it with them. They’ll have to answer to the Lord at the judgment for rejecting it and supporting those who ‘…. steal, kill and destroy.”

          Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 9:23 pm

          • Oh, wait, it was Diane that said that. Sorry, I should know you guys are working off the same playbook.
            Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 9:30 pm

            • You might say, that Jeff, that Jim and I work from the same ‘play book’. That’s called the Bible. I’m honored to be ‘lumped into’ the same group and mindset as Jim Rizoli – two great minds, one common thought. More on this whole idea soon.

              Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 7:56 am

              • The quote I was talking about didn’t come from the bible.
                Yay, you have more coming?????????
                Can’t wait.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 8:01 am

        • Haven’t you said all that before?
          Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

          Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 9:24 pm

          • Jeff for some reason I’m having a hard time getting it through to you.

            Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 10:02 pm

            • Jim, I could honestly say the same thing.
              Jeff

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 10:06 pm

          • Yes, we have posted this quote before and it bears repeating as you continue to trot out the bogus, lying (or at best misinformed and deranged) testimonies of survivors that even THE JEWS declare are beyond credibility.

            The memory plays heinous tricks on us but in attempt to help us deal with things, and I have no doubt that being rounded up and shipped to Poland (only worse place would have been the Gulags in the Soviet Union to which millions were shipped, by the way), will produce hallucinations and hiccups in the memories, easily filled in by unscrupulous spin meisters with their own prevailing and oppressive political agendas.

            Eyewitness testimonies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYehKI0isO8

            False Memories and Misinformation Effect: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQ-96BLaKYQ

            Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 8:18 am

    • Now, that’s not very nice.
      Truth be told, Jim, though I was raised as a Catholic I’m not particularly religious.
      I’m not an atheist per se, more of an agnostic.
      If you catch me in a particularly philosophical mood I’d tell you that God exists, if for no other reason that people created him/her/it (I find it odd to assign a gender to God), that instead of God creating us in its image we created God in ours.
      But, that’s me being philosophical.
      I don’t think Jesus would appreciate your views.
      Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew.

      Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 8:03 pm

      • Jesus Christ held a premium on truth, as Truth leads people to HIM Who IS THE TRUTH ….. The realm of truth extends to all spheres especially dealing with other people and the oppression of other people. The jews, no longer the chosen people, make it their aim to ‘… steal, kill and destroy.’ That’s bullying when these self-same, self-appointed judges and executioners oppress people, cities, states, nations and they have a strong track record for doing so. Of THEM, Jesus spoke harshly because of their abuse … that the gentiles will curse Him because of them. He even referred to the jewish leadership as THE JEWS and they were an ongoing problem for the apostle Paul as well.

        No, you’re wrong, Jeff. Jim is dead-on concerning his devotion to the Lord in dealing with the issue of truth or (with regard to the holocost endorsers) lack thereof and confronting it proactively as he is doing. He is contending against an egregious and supremely wicked, soul-destroying entity and its minions. Our desire is merely for those taken in and enslaved by its lies to be freed from it. Many of us have gone to jail for our efforts and some of us still will. Some of us have been beaten, killed, persecuted, hunted down because we refuse to bow to this ‘Baal’ called the holocost.

        In esteeming one side right or the other just on the surface, based on the harsh, debilitating, murderous bent of one side to suppress the other side, which one would be right? On that alone, I’d take a careful look at WHY the holocost supporters are so adamant and vicious. Why not a ‘live and let live’ philosophy regarding public opinion? THAT would decide it for me. I loathe the bullying the holocost lobby, politicians, ADL, JDL, ad nauseum impose to try to affect their agenda. NO THANKS.

        Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 9:16 pm

        • dianeking/jrizzoli. JESUS CHRIST had been during HIS live on earth the believing Jews Rabbi Jeshu baJosef haGlili who did not want the Disciples to go in the cities of Gentile but only to reach the LOST SHEEP OF THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL. And nowaday HE would be a Holocaust victim, martyr or survivor. Clear?

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 24, 2016 @ 7:04 am

          • Wolfe if Jesus Christ were alive today you Jews would of murdered him again. Just like you did back then nothing has changed just the amount of time that has gone by he exposed you for what you were lying a treacherous lot of people and you would have killed him again.
            Your day is coming and he hasn’t forgotten what you people have done.
            and that goes for thucksters hucksters back you up

            Comment by jrizoli — January 24, 2016 @ 7:13 am

            • Technically the Romans, not the Jews, executed Jesus.
              Important thing to remember:
              No Jews = no Christianity
              No Jews = no Islam
              Jeff

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 7:24 am

              • The Romans were the mechanism of execution of Jesus Christ, but from nearly the beginning of His ministry, the jewish leadership were hell bent on his destruction. (Mark 3:6: And the Pharisees went forth, and straightway took counsel with the Herodians against him, how they might destroy him; Jn 11:53: Then from that day forth they took counsel together for to put him to death; Mt 12:14: 14Then the Pharisees went out, and held a council against him, how they might destroy him. – largely because he healed a man’s hand on the sabbath, showing up the jewish leadership.)

                This next one is huge, because the jews understood what Jesus was saying and it aroused their wrath, Jn 10:30-39 – 31Then the Jews took up stones again to stone him. 32Jesus answered them, Many good works have I shewed you from my Father; for which of those works do ye stone me? 33The Jews answered him, saying, For a good work we stone thee not; but for blasphemy; and because that thou, being a man, makest thyself God. 34Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods? 35If he called them gods, unto whom the word of God came, and the scripture cannot be broken; 36Say ye of him, whom the Father hath sanctified, and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest; because I said, I am the Son of God? 37If I do not the works of my Father, believe me not. 38But if I do, though ye believe not me, believe the works: that ye may know, and believe, that the Father is in me, and I in him. 39Therefore they sought again to take him: but he escaped out of their hand.

                Again, why did the jewish leadership hate Jesus Christ? Because HE exposed their deeds, He showed them up. He told the crowds that their righteous had to surpass that of the Scribes and Pharisees and then he explained why.

                The Jews were ‘chosen’ for one purpose and that was to be the nest, if you will for the Messiah; however, God told Moses after they left Egypt and were horribly complaining about their sojourn of travel, that he would kill them – ALL OF THEM and raise up a new batch through Moses. Moses begged him not to do that. They were also offered a kind of privileged life, IF they followed the rules – choosing between the blessing and curse: Deut 26-28 Behold, I set before you this day a blessing and a curse. A blessing, if ye obey the commandments of the LORD your God, which I command you this day, And a curse, if ye will not obey the commandments of the LORD your God, but turn aside out of the way which I command you this day, to go after other gods, which ye have not known.

                and they BLEW IT. The Lord gave them a few millennium to get it straightened out … they refused and he sent them into captivity and they lost their kingdom(s).

                God didn’t need the Jews to bring about his ONLY BEGOTTEN SON nor the existence of Arabs. He could have done it another way. When THE JEWS boasted to John the Baptist about their heritage to Abraham, that didn’t impress him either, having the mind of God as a prophet, said: Mt 3:9: And think not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.

                Here’s a poem that I find very appropriate concerning the Jews from the very beginning:

                “….. The Jews, a headstrong, moody, murm’ring race,
                As ever tri’d th’extent and stretch of grace;
                God’s pamper’d people whom, debauch’d with ease,
                No king could govern, nor no God could please …..”

                Absalom and Achitophel, John Dryden (1631-1700)

                Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 8:44 am

                • Naturally I don’t have the same knowledge of the bible you do.
                  I will yield to your ability to twist the bible into hate speech.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 8:48 am

                • Biblical teaching as hate speech – that’s very jewish of you, by the way. Don’t cut yourself short, though you may not have the ‘speech’, you have the action of your forebears as they plotted to kill the Savior.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 9:04 am

                • Jeff the comment you made about turning the Bible into hate speech is it typical Jew answer. Considering that half of the Jews are atheists they have no respect for the Bible, or God I might add. Yet they still consider themselves Jews figure that one out. TheJewish religion started with the Bible yet they don’t even believe in it apparently you don’t either.
                  That’s why when quoting the ninth commandment which says you shall not bear false witness the Jews and you Holohuxsters are guilty of breaking that commandment I would not want to be in that position in God’s eyes.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 24, 2016 @ 9:40 am

                • Jeff, Bradberry and King line up with the verifiable conclusions of Leuchter, Rudolf and Faurisson. I think my selections are pristine. Unlike yours if among your academically challenged selections you have ANYTHING from Wiesel – the jew with no tattoo and can’t figure out which of the 3 camps he was in SIMULTANEOUSLY (for example).

                  No tattoo: http://www.eliewieseltattoo.com/tag/holocaust-fraud/

                  Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 3:58 pm

                • I’m sorry, did you just say your sources are pristine?
                  I actually thought of a different word:
                  HACKS.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 4:06 pm

                • Since the Jews reject the Savior, Jesus Christ, then they are left with judgment (Jn 3:18: He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.) and the law – so EVERY part of the law becomes the judge, not the least of which is the TEN COMMANDMENTS. ALL of us have broken them if not literally then the spirit of them – because the thoughts and intentions of our hearts will also be judged. Jesus can be our mediator if we trust Him to be that for us…. our Advocate because he paid the price to redeem us. But let’s do a checkup.

                  The Ten Commandments

                  I am the Lord, your God.
                  Thou shall bring no false idols before me.
                  Do not take the name of the Lord in vain.
                  Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy.
                  Honor thy father and thy mother.
                  Thou shall not kill/murder.
                  Thou shall not commit adultery.
                  Thou shall not steal.
                  Thou shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.
                  Thou shall not covet‡ your neighbor’s wife (or anything that belongs to your neighbor).

                  Not JUST those but all the ceremonial and dietary, every law must be obeyed ALL THE TIME if you live outside of the Grace of Jesus Christ. Jesus said that our righteousness must surpass that of the scribes and pharisees. We have to have something better than what THEY had and guess what – we DO. Jesus is the author of TRUTH, LIFE…. LIGHT….

                  The lying and deception inherent in the whole holocost narrative violates the 10 Commandments as do those who participate in it. As Jim said, that’s not an enviable position. Oh, by the way, the Talmud does not replace the OT Scriptures – IT is a perversion to immense proportions. The OT Scriptures lead us to Christ. The Talmud? Take a guess. Interesting future, huh, Jeff! Choose you this day whom you will serve….

                  Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 6:35 pm

                • So, I have to become a denier to be saved?
                  Spare me. What a load of crap.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 6:56 pm

                • Well, Jeff, you have just drawn a line in the sand to the Lord. Most people JUST come through believing in Christ and accepting his work on the cross – done. YOU might actually HAVE TO convert to being denier.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 25, 2016 @ 8:32 am

                • Jeff….for you and your HoloHuxsters….

                  “Most of the memoirs and reports of Holocaust survivors are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…”
                  –Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950,
                  Vol. 12, p. 65

                  I love all those eyewitnesses that for some reason you dismiss…..

                  http://balder.org/judea/The-Most-Fantastic-Holocaust-Survivor-Stories-Jewish-Soap-Lampshades-Fertilizer-Mengele-Miracles.php

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 25, 2016 @ 8:37 am

                • How amusing, apparently I’m back to being a Jew again.
                  I’m not but I’ll give you a glimpse into the reason why I’ve not been in a church for years.
                  It’s the need for organized religions to get into a pissing contest over whose God is better.
                  That’s everyone, Christians, Jews, Muslims, etc.
                  We see fit to kill each other everyday over a God who is looking down upon us, bemused and wondering if maybe dinosaurs were a better idea.
                  So please, spare me the prattle.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 10:12 am

                • jrizoli/dianeking. Read the Gospel of John. Jesus Christ had been captured by the Roman Cohort comanded by the Tribune. Questioned by Roman Governor Pontius Pilatus who at a certain moment asked. “… do you know that I have the power to free or crucifize you?” Just this simple quotation rebukes your entire hatred non sense. Note that the Gospel of John is considered perfectly consistent with Roman History. Reading the first chapters of Mathew and Luke one can learn that Jesus Christ – Rabbi Jeshu barJosef ha Glili – had been a descendent of King David and therefore suspected to have revolutionary aims. A Roman Governor of a Province had to obbey only to the Emperor; certainly not to the leaders of subdued people.
                  You in every comment show only hatred and deep ignorance of historical facts. In the deepest hell you both will be properly greeted by the former SS Judenjaeger – Eichmann team men – employed there as Master Devils.

                  Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 25, 2016 @ 2:27 am

                • the jews turned Jesus over to the Romans and petitioned them to execute Him. When Pilate found nothing by which to accuse or condemn him, the jews railed stating he must be destroyed and HIS BLOOD BE UPON THEIR HEADS AND THEIR CHILDREN’S. They were more than complicit. Again, understand your people tried to murder Jesus Christ and for all intents and purposes, they were successful. Problem is HE AROSE AGAIN. (Rats, foiled again, I’m sure). He lives and the believers live and share his mesg.. Even your lies and the lies of your people didn’t stop that.

                  There were more conspiracies to lie and defraud down through the ages, but this one ‘takes the cake’. Mt 28:11-15: 11Now when they were going, behold, some of the watch came into the city, and shewed unto the chief priests all the things that were done. 12And when they were assembled with the elders, and had taken counsel, they gave large money unto the soldiers, 13Saying, Say ye, His disciples came by night, and stole him away while we slept. 14And if this come to the governor’s ears, we will persuade him, and secure you. 15So they took the money, and did as they were taught: and this saying is commonly reported among the Jews until this day.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 25, 2016 @ 4:38 pm

                • The Jews are pretty good at not getting their hands dirty and in this case they got the Romans to do the dirty deed of killing Jesus.
                  If Jesus were alive today I’m sure Wolfe and his Holohuckster friends would be the first ones to turn against Jesus and have him killed.
                  When you have a religion and a belief system that is based on a lie Then everything else you do really makes no difference because you show your true qualities by what you spread and teach.
                  God will judge them when the day comes.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 25, 2016 @ 4:43 pm

            • Exactly, JIm, THE JEWS and their minions are no more tolerant of dissent now than they were 2000 years.

              But the Lord is obviously giving them time to repent, all of us to come to (or back to) Him through Jesus Christ. 2 Peter 3:9: The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.

              We don’t ‘have it all’ figured out, but we are operating on revealed light and it points to the truths, part of which we present here. Again, failing that (and it seems in your realm, that is the operative word), look at the lives of the people involved and the ones they oppose? How are they treated? How do the holohoaxers treat the ‘holocost deniers’? It’s very telling. The Lord longs for US to deal justly with others and we strive to do that. You people, you holocost promoters – “… steal, kill and destroy…” in any and every way you can. You may not be involved in such personally but you are complicit with those who are.

              Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 8:52 am

          • I don’t think so. You Jews would have killed him LONG before the National Socialists would – oh wait, YOU DID.

            But even so, would he be YOUR champion? Do YOU believe in Him? THAT will be the first and preeminent question at the judgement. So, if he would suffer your fate being transported to Auschwitz, would you embrace HIM as your Savior when all was said and done because He suffered like that with your people?

            Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 9:00 am

            • Wolf is a Jew, Diane. Other than acknowledge Jesus as a historical figure, what exactly do you want him to do?
              For that matter, Wolf is under no obligation to venerate anyone, be it Jesus, Mohammed or Buddha.
              Jeff

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 9:19 am

              • jrizoli/dianeking. I believe in G’D just as Rabbi Jeshu barJosef haGlili believed and since 1979 i am rebuking the terrible deicide accusation showing how historically baseless it is. I obtained the permission to attend the library of PONTIFICAL BIBLICAL INSTITUTE at Rome as I explained my aim to research and explain reasons and historical context of our comunities separation. I had been told “You now are continuing your Father’s work”; my Father had been a qualified scholar. When talking about other religions or with people of other religion one ought to show the due respect, avoiding offensive statements or cartons. The free speech in no way can turn in hatred spraying or offenses in order to prevent violence, bloody wars or so. And when necessary states have to set the proper legal limits enforced by punishments.

                Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 25, 2016 @ 7:28 am

  8. Diane You nailed it.

    JR
    CCFIILE.COM

    Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 4:59 pm

    • No, she really didn’t.
      Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

      Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 5:25 pm

  9. Jim hasn’t been able to post ( of his near dozen responses ) for over 3 hours – what’s going on with this!!!!

    Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 2:43 pm

    • 🙂

      Comment by srebrenica — January 23, 2016 @ 3:06 pm

    • It’s the Jews.
      You really pissed them off this time!!!!!!!!
      Mu ha ha ha !!!!!!!!!
      Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

      Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 3:13 pm

      • I guess it’s just a malfunction??? LOL

        Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 3:42 pm

      • Yes, srebrenica, it is. I’ve seen this happen before NUMEROUS times with different people. Or the jews’ lackeys which are worse blocking freedom of expression/discussion. Sheesh!

        HOLOCOSTOMANIA – Subscribing to the politically correct view of the holocost without question or discussion – rots the brain, corrupts the morals and creates a psychopath. The only cure is the truth provided by those who oppose and contend against the wholesale force feeding and consequent perversion of the myth of the holocost. (Diane King)

        Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 3:46 pm

        • I’m sure funny things will happen here…..Most sites get hijacked by the Jews in some way or another.

          JR

          CCFIILE.COM

          Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 3:50 pm

          • It’s the attack of the killer Jews!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
            Is that anything like the attack of killer tomatoes??????
            😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😄😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😆😆😆😅😅😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
            What a pair of conspiraloons!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
            Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 4:53 pm

            • Ya, things just happen by accident here.
              Just like the dissappeance of 6 million jews

              JR
              CCFIILE. COM

              Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 5:08 pm

              • Oh, come now, Jim.
                First, the six million Jews didn’t just disappear. They died through gassing, getting shot and through malnutrition, disease and abuse.
                I’m glad we cleared that up.
                Second, perhaps you need to reset your internet when something like that happens. My internet messes up too, resetting it fixes the problem.
                Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 5:57 pm

              • Diane:
                I’m going to say this in the nicest way I can.
                I really don’t care what Benton Bradberry says.
                Please don’t take offense.
                Now, to the matter of the amount of Jews the Nazis had under their control:
                Europe contained within its borders the largest number of Jews on the planet before World War II. Approximately 11 million out of the approximately 17 million Jews in the world lived in Europe.
                At one point, October of 1942, the Germans controlled or was allied to almost all of the countries in Europe, from the Volga in the Soviet Union to the English Channel off the coast of France. The only nominally independent countries at that point in Europe were Switzerland, Spain, Portugal and Sweeden. The Germans occupied or were allied to everyone else. There were 3.3 million Jews in Poland alone, with possibly about another 2 million Jews in the occupied areas of the Soviet Union. The next largest concentration of Jews was in Hungary.
                Generally Jews suffered more in areas directly controlled by the Germans.
                The largest death tolls break down this way:
                3 million in Poland
                900,000 in occupied Soviet Union
                Approximately 400,000 in Hungary (occupied by the Germans in the Spring of 1944)
                So, as you can see, that’s 4.3 million Jews ALONE. The rest of the million or so Jews the Nazis murdered came from France, the Netherlands, Greece, Germany, Austria, etc., etc.
                So, unfortunately, you are wrong.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 7:53 pm

                • So Jeff now prove that Hitler killed 6 Million Jews….
                  All talk no forensic proof. Poof all gone no proof.
                  As Norman Finklestein mother said if so many Jews survived then who died?

                  JR
                  CCFIILE.COM

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 7:59 pm

                • Yawn.
                  I’ve already talked about forensic proof.
                  Anything I give you regarding proof you’ll just call it a lie, a forgery, a Jewish plot.
                  Does it ever get old, imitating a broken record?
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 8:09 pm

                • I don’t know, Jeff, does it, get tiring, imitating a broken record, I mean? Toss yours and listen to ours. Quit saying stupid unverifiable things. Sheesh! But OK, a bit of reason from a friend of mine, Edgar Steele (RIP): “Or, as my buddy Al likes to say: In all of German-occupied Europe , there were 2.4 million Jews. After the war, 3.8 million Jews applied for Holocaust reparations. Tragically, the remaining 6 million were lost. More Jews received pensions than were present in German-occupied Europe because so many of them moved west from Russia after the war and cleaned up on the pension scam.”

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCI32Hf_eRI (part 1)

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxBO7e1QMdo (part 2)

                  Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 8:18 pm

                • You mean the same racist Edgar Steele that died in prison after being convicted of trying to murder his wife?
                  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Steele
                  Oh, you are wrong about the amount of Jews under German control.
                  So sorry.
                  Refer to my previous comment.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 8:32 pm

  10. To Mr. White: about Ben Bradberrys book
    Ben replies below…

    Mr. White, in debates, normal conversations, or in Anglo/Saxon jurisprudence, it is the responsibility of the accuser, or the person presenting a proposition, to prove his case. It is not enough to merely make a propositional statement without any hard evidence to back it up. The listener has no responsibility to prove a negative, or to disprove the proposition you presented without any evidence. It is up to you to prove your case.

    Let’s see, let’s use an example. You state to a group of people that, “While walking in the woods I saw a UFO alien spacecraft land in a clearing. Three space aliens got out and walked around. They even took my dog, then got back in, and the thing took off again and disappeared.” The listener says, “I don’t believe you. Do you have any evidence that such a thing occurred?” You say, “Yes, I have eye witnesses. Two other people were with me who will swear that they saw it too. Besides, my dog is missing. Do you see my dog? Well, then, how can you say it didn’t happen?” You ask, “Do you have any ‘real’ evidence, like a photograph, or even exhaust burn marks on the ground, anything?” You say, “No, but my ‘eye witnesses are very reliable. They would never tell a lie. ” Well, that about summarizes the “Holocaust” story. No forensic evidence that any of the “Holocaust” actually occurred, but thousands of Jewish “eye witnesses,” all, incidentally telling conflicting, contradictory stories, most so preposterous that a rational person could not possible believe any of it.

    Let’s see again. You say, “I saw 2,000 Jews being herded into the “gas chamber” at Auschwitz, and then 15 minutes later, they opened the door and they were all dead. Not only that, but they did this repeatedly throughout the day, day in and day out, until in the end, they gassed and burned 4 million Jews. In fact, by this method, during a 6 week period in 1944 they gassed 440,000 Hungarian Jews, then disposed of their bodies by burning them in their crematoria, so that there was no evidence of what happened left behind.” The listener asks, “Where’s your proof.” You say, “I have 5,000 Jewish eye witnesses, all ‘Holocaust survivors’ of Auschwitz. But I don’t have any ‘forensic’ evidence because those clever Germans destroyed every single bit of it before they pulled out. So you have to believe the ‘eye witnesses.’ ” You Jews may well be smarter than the rest of us, as you claim, but even we Goyim are not dumb enough to swallow that.

    So, Mr Irving Wiese (I.White), it is up to you who make these preposterous Holocaust claims to prove your case, not us “deniers” to disprove it. So far, you have not proved your case, but because Jews control the information and entertainment media throughout the West, you have persuaded the low information public that the Holocaust actually happened. Fortunately there are enough smart people around who actually ask for proof. We “deniers” are simply asking for proof. Back to you, Irving.

    Ben Bradberry

    Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 12:44 pm

    • The proof exists, Diane.
      The problem is deniers say about the proof:
      It’s a forgery.
      It’s misinterpreted.
      It’s lies.
      You also said, “4 million gassed at Auschwitz.”
      No one ever claimed that 4 million were gassed. Even the original plaque never said that. It just said murdered.
      The plaque also never specified Jews. It just said people.
      This is how you spell people:
      P E O P L E
      This is how you spell Jews:
      J E W S
      See the difference? Not even close.
      Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

      Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 12:59 pm

      • The jews claim that 4 million represents them. And really, 4 million murdered … how? Wait, it wasn’t 4 million, went down to 2 or 3 million then 1.5 million. Now the number tallies are fussy because it’s maybe in the 100 thousands TOTAL…. oops, there goes the jewish neighborhood that can’t oy-vey having hijacked the Auschwitz numbers for their benefit.

        http://rense.com/general62/auch.htm

        Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 1:13 pm

        • No, Diane. The Jews never claimed the 4 million. That number was arrived at by a couple of different ways. The primary one I remember is that the Soviet investigators based that number by estimating how many could die in the five years the camp was open.
          Even Hoess disputed the number, saying there were limits to even Auschwitz’s destructive capabilities.
          The Soviets and Communist Poles actually downplayed the “Jewishness” of the dead, wanting to sell the solidarity angle.
          Jeff

          Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 1:31 pm

        • Diane – http://www.theatlantic.com/photo/2011/10/world-war-ii-the-holocaust/100170/

          Comment by srebrenica — January 23, 2016 @ 1:51 pm

  11. I wonder if we’ll hit 300.
    Jeff

    Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 6:21 pm

  12. Diane, unfortunately I had a hard time reading your response.
    However, I did pick out the name, Nesta Webster. Intrigued, because I’d never heard of her before, I looked her up.
    Some contemporaries of her said the following:
    In February 1924, Hilaire Belloc wrote to an American Jewish friend regarding one of Webster’s publications which purported to expose evidence of Jewish conspiracy. Though Belloc’s record of writing about Jews has attracted accusations of antisemitism itself, his contempt for Webster’s own efforts was evident:
    In my opinion it is a lunatic book. She is one of those people who have got one cause on the brain. It is the good old ‘Jewish revolutionary’ bogey. But there is a type of unstable mind which cannot rest without morbid imaginings, and the conception of a single cause simplifies thought. With this good woman it is the Jews, with some people it is the Jesuits, with others Freemasons and so on. The world is more complex than that.[28]

    Umberto Eco, whose novel The Prague Cemetery recounts the development of the Protocols, has characterised Webster’s propagation of the document as evidence of a delusional tendency:
    In 1921… the Times of London discovered the old pamphlet by Joly and realized that it was the source for the Protocols. But evidence is not enough for those who want to live in a horror novel… [Webster’s] syllogism is impeccable: since the Protocols resemble the story I have told, they confirm it. Or: the Protocols confirm the story I have concocted from them; therefore they are true.[29]

    She was also a member of the British Fascists.

    Sorry, not going to take her seriously.
    However, I will not call her a liar, since I honestly believe the nice lady needed some help.
    Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

    Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 2:20 pm

  13. See, Hermie, Jim doesn’t think I’m a Jew.
    Apparently I think like one, however.
    I’m not exactly sure what that means.
    Maybe Jim can enlighten me.
    Jim, just because I don’t follow your crazy train logic doesn’t mean that I “think like a Jew.” It means that after 30 some odd years that I’ve spent studying history I’ve formed my own conclusions.
    I won’t go into those conclusions, you already know them.
    So, you really don’t score points with me by telling me that I think like a Jew and calling a respected historian like Rees a liar.
    Your only explanation for calling Rees a liar:
    He talked about gas chambers.
    Jeff

    Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 11:28 am

    • JEFF. In the early twenties of last century a German writer developped the “spiritual anti Semitism” targetting friends and disciples of Jewish scholars, followers of Jewish writers, associates of Jewish researchers, etc. I see that JRIZZOLI and DIANE KING follow this way of thinking.

      Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 23, 2016 @ 2:50 am

      • Wolfe it’s not like we don’t like Jews we just don’t like people that think they’re special and should receive special privileges just because the end Jews. You people have a superiority complex and think that everybody should bow down and worship you and respect you. Then you get everybody to feel sorry for you. I don’t know why you people just can’t act normal. You have made your own bed and you laying we are we’re not going to take any crap from you. But the weapon that you use to subjective us is the Holocaust and that’s why any chance we get we going to expose your lie and how you are using that lie to manipulate the masses.

        Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 5:54 am

        • jrizzoli. For centuries we Jew had been targetted by continous defamation which excited the masses to vilonet attacks against our comunities until the Shoah-Holocaust. And your comments on various posts at this blog are following these century long defamation based on the deicide, the blood libel, and many other accusations due to ignorance and/or will to divert attention from real problems. Perhaps you and your friends want to go on with the deeds of Hitler and the Nazis.

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 23, 2016 @ 7:01 am

          • Wolfe I actually feel sorry for you a person of your age not seeing what’s really going on in the world not seeing what your religion has done to the people in this world Really a sad case and then you try to turn it around to make it look like with a bad guys You’re the bad guy Wolfe you’re the one that is perpetuating a lie what can I say and you continue to do so and then you blame all the problems on the Jews on everybody else Again like I said before that’s a despicable act and God will judge you for that when the day comes.
            The good news is we are not going to take it we’re going to expose you at every corner and when we are going let the world know that you people are a sham.
            If Hitler wanted you people destroyed you all would have been destroyed. Not One of you would is survived. But the fact he played ball with you And actually try to help you and actually gave you a chance to get out of that country That’s where the problem was. Hitler should have just destroyed the whole lot and we wouldn’t have any of you here today. He was actually too nice to you.

            Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 8:14 am

            • That’s repulsive, Rizoli.
              Remind me, what kind of a Christian are you?
              And, that’s your argument? The fact that some of the Jews survived? Oh, and Hitler was TOO nice to the Jews?
              Before the war the Nazis forced Jews to emigrate but before that it forced them to give up everything thing they owned. So, while the Nazis didn’t like Jews they did like their property and their businesses. But hey, why just make them leave when you can rob them blind, right? Even when Jews were allowed to sell what they had it was for a song. I thought Jews were the cheats but I was wrong about that, too.
              Even without the Holocaust, deporting people hundreds or thousands of miles from their homes and sticking them in camps is not a way to prolong someone’s life.
              So, Rizoli, you keep on admiring Hitler. I know you secretly admire him for the Jews he did manage to kill.
              Oh, hey, congratulations on being part of the “Shoah Business.” Without it you would be what, just another carpet cleaner from Framingham, Massachusetts?
              Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 9:10 am

              • Wrong again, Jeff. Hitler did not send the jews out without their possessions – another propaganda point. Here’s a bit on the TRANSFER AGREEMENT, should this SMALL detail be missed: First of all, the reason the jews were to go: ”(Edwin Black, Jewish author. The Transfer Agreement, p.34) In London, almost all Jewish shops in the Whitechapel district were displaying placards denying entry to German salesmen and affirming their anti-Nazi boycott. Teenagers patrolled the streets distributing handbills asking shoppers to boycott German goods…..”- (Edwin Black, Jewish Writer and Author, The Transfer Agreement, p.46/47 ) Mass meetings of Jews were held throughout Poland expressing support for the boycott. The largest Warsaw Jewish commercial organizations passed binding resolutions to “use the most radical means of defense by boycotting German imports.”After this spectacular declaration of war, it should have been clear to all Jews, and particularly those Jews living in Germany, that such a provocation would produce some kind of backlash…. Before the revolution of last March [when Hitler and the National Socialists came to power], the Jews in the Reich overran every government department, and enjoyed the highest privileges in every profession and calling. They were the principle organizers of the Communist Party, and became identified with every one of the seventy-two warring political sects in the country.”“In every way they proved themselves eminently capable businessmen and politicians. Many had grown very wealthy. Nearly every German war profiteer was a Jew; the native German seems to have regarded with feelings of shame and horror the idea of making money out of his country during times of great stress. . ““That one per cent of the population of Germany should impose their rule and culture —however eminent that culture may be —on more than sixty-million native born Germans is unreasonable, to use no stronger word…”“So when the Nazi worm turned, and the services of many Jews were dispensed with, Jewry throughout the world rose in arms and through the medium of the Press here, and public meetings in London and the provinces, denounced the German Government in violent terms.”

                On August 25, 1933 Hitler entered into a pact with representatives of the Jewish Agency, whose members would eventually become the leaders of Israel. The pact was called the Haavara Agreement, or Transfer Agreement, which was a program for moving the Jews out of Germany to Palestine. “Haavara”in Hebrew means to move, or to relocate. The German Interior Ministry was put in charge of the logistics for the program and the Reichsbank and the German Treasury were responsible for financing the mass emigration. By November, 1933 the program was in full swing and it kept functioning until well into 1942. The aim was to conduct a peaceful and painless transfer of Jews out of Germany to Palestine with as little inconvenience to the Jews as possible. Coercive measures were used to push those who were unwilling to go. The Zionists even offered suggestions on ways to speed up the emigration process out of Germany. It was a Zionist idea, for example, to force the Jews in Germany to wear the yellow stars. The more pressure applied on the Jews, they reasoned, the more likely they were to leave Germany. Contrary to popular myth today, Germany’s Jews were permitted to leave with practically all of their possessions and all of their wealth, provided that Jews deposited all of their assets in one of two Jewish owned banks in Germany which had branch offices in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Upon arrival in Palestine thy could withdraw their assets according to the terms of the agreement. The German capital of these two Jewish banking firms was guaranteed by the German government. Even after the war these assets were fully available to the Jewish owners or their representatives. Even those Jews who decided to remain in Germany for the time being could transfer all of their assets out of Germany to Palestine through these two banks.”

                A COOPERATIVE PLAN WITH THE ZIONISTS – Germans wanted the Jews out (nearly half a million left WITH their assets) and the zionists wanted these jews in Palestine.

                The jewish way was a death nell to the German economy, the German people. For that reason alone, many countries would have exterminated them. Russia would be the first (except the hierarchy consisted of jews). The only way to deal with this is to remove them. The Havaara until the war, transported East (eastern borders of the newly conquered Reich until after the war) Then off the continent to Madagascar of some other island nation, least affected by the larcenous, lascivious jews (as the final solution — EMIGRATION not extermination).

                Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 11:19 am

                • I’m still trying to figure out how a boycott equals a declaration of war.
                  That was actually very concise, well researched and very informative.
                  Of course, it doesn’t tell the full story. This applies, it seems, to German Jews. When Eichman set up his emigration plan in Austria Austrian Jews had to give up everything in order to emigrate.
                  Naturally, the article does not address British opposition to Jewish emigration to Palestine. The British limited emigration because they did not want to stir up Muslim opposition (historically British policy favored the Muslims).
                  This does not address the other European Jews who lost everything when they were “deported.” German Jews no longer had this option when war broke out.
                  So, while I completely accept some of your explanation it leaves out a great deal.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 11:40 am

                • Seriously, Germany was pounded into near nonexistence by the Versailles treaty, living through the the scavenger behavior of the jewish vultures. The total moral depravity imposed on them, demoralization, deflation of the German Mark, to name a few things. FINALLY, Hitler becomes Chancellor and it seems things were turning around and the jews declare war with an economical boycott. Hadn’t even had a chance to recover, and this is completely subversive. Hitler attempts a 1-day jewish boycott to try to get them to cease the German boycott. This could legitimately have been the point where the Germans rounded up the jews and begun to send them out, but they didn’t. It seems to have inspired the zionist-desired migration of Jews out of Germany to Palestine. (Transfer Agreement).

                  An ethnic segment attacking a beleaguered country? (It was international wide) I think this is NOT the way to ingratiate yourself to your host country. I applaud German restraint against this debilitating action.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 1:38 pm

                • One of the German authorities’ principal goals in negotiating with the Zionist movement was to fragment the Jewish boycott of German goods. Although in retrospect we know the boycott had only a marginal effect on German economic. development in the 1930s, at the time it was perceived as a genuine threat.
                  Correspondence between Heinrich Wolff, the German consul in Palestine, and the German Foreign Ministry shows that shattering the boycott was a key motive for the German authorities in concluding the Transfer Agreement (Yf’aat Weiss)

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 23, 2016 @ 12:32 pm

              • That’s tacky, Jeff, even for you regarding Jim and what happened with him concerning his carpet cleaning business. He was honest, hardworking and provided a service worth the cost, so much so that even after retirement, he is still called upon for his services. Note that about 75% of his business was Jews. When he moved from discussing the problems of illegal immigration (on his own time and in producing videos) to discussion and producing shows regarding the power behind the #1 international extortion racket, what we know as the holocost, in spite of his sterling service, and good treatment of ALL of his clients, the jewish clientele dropped him. Was that right? That such an action be directed against him because of his political views (obviously religious views to them – after all, Shoah business is the biggest industry in the religious OR political sector), that he be marginalized?

                I’ve included paragraphs in other postings to you about the true character of the jews in the Weimar years, which I believe is a characteristic of the ‘breed’. Yes, especially with what Germans had to deal, Hitler WAS too nice to them. He didn’t have to be. (I’d post the portrait picture I have of him, that says, “Next time, no more Mr. Nice Guy.”

                “National Socialism emphasized the community of the German Volk, and glorified the comradeship of men in arms as defenders of the German nation. The Nazi movement became a magnet for those who had become disillusioned by the chaos in Germany under the Weimar Republic. Although he is endlessly castigated as “the most notorious racist of the twentieth century,”Hitler’s racial views were in perfect harmony with mainstream 19th- and early 20th-century European thinking. Far from being aberrant or bizarre, his views on race were consistent with those of most prominent Westerners in the decades before the Second World War, such as those of Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill, for example. Contrary to popular belief, Hitler never supported any program of breeding a homogeneous blond “hyper-Aryan”race. That was just propaganda. He fully accepted the reality that the German population consisted of several distinct sub-racial groups, and stressed the German people’s national and social unity. A certain degree of racial variety was desirable, he thought, and too much racial blending or homogeneity could be harmful because it would homogenize and thus eliminate superior as well as inferior genetic traits.” (TMOFV, BLB)

                I don’t think any politician save for maybe President Putin can make this claim.

                Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 11:29 am

                • What, and what Jim said wasn’t tacky?
                  Actually, I have no faults with Jim over his business. Good for him, being a business owner. Obviously he did well for himself if he can now spend his time making crappy videos and interviewing noted Holocaust deniers (you misspelled it again).
                  So hey, good for Jim. I’d feel even better about him if he wasn’t a loathsome racist anti-Semite.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 11:48 am

                • Jeff I’d feel good about you if you were not another HoloHuxster.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 11:54 am

                • What is it that you expect from me, Jim?
                  That I can simply accept what you and Diane say and somehow change what I know is true?
                  Let me give you an example:
                  I saw earlier on, at a blog called Holocaust Controversies:
                  There is a Holocaust denier named Santiago who states that a document talking about gas vans was a forgery.
                  This was my reaction:
                  Why in earth would someone fake a document about gas vans, of all things? Why make up gas vans at all? If you wanted to make something up, wouldn’t you keep it simple?
                  So, I’m supposed to believe that every document that confirms the Holocaust a forgery? That all testimony, all statements are false?
                  Please don’t insult my intelligence.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 12:37 pm

                • Yes, Jeff; now, you’re getting it. The Soviets and their cronies (their allies – US) pulled out all the stops to accuse the Germans of any and EVERYTHING. It seems to be that whatever the Soviets did, it was like this – “Let’s say the Germans did it even though they didn’t and we did…. who cares …. who will know…. we’re the victors.”

                  Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 12:58 pm

                • Yes, that’s right Diane. The Soviets did it.
                  No, wait, I thought it was the Jews.
                  Wait, I thought it was the British SOE psych-opps division.
                  I’m confused.
                  Do the Jews run everything?
                  Or, is it the Soviets?
                  I thought all Jews were capitalists that run the banks.
                  But, aren’t all Jews Communists? Or, are they anarchists? Isn’t that anti-capital?
                  So confusing. So, the big capital Jews that run the monetary systems are also the face behind the anti-capital Communists?
                  Isn’t that self-defeating?
                  But, no wait, I forgot something!!!!!!!
                  The whole purpose behind faking the Holocaust was to give the Jews a tiny country in the middle-East!!!!!!
                  Well, that’s a bit of a rip off. I mean, someone didn’t think that through. I’d want a bigger country. With access to oil.
                  Ok, so mission accomplished!!!!! The Jews now have Isreal!!!!!!! Yay!!!!!!!!
                  Well, if that’s the whole point, why would you keep drawing attention to your conspiracy? If it’s all a lie, wouldn’t you want to let it go? Why drag Eichman out of his comfortable Nazi nest in South America? He showed no real interest in popping back out in public, other than dictating the Sassen Papers, which basically confirmed that:
                  Yes, Viirginia, there was a Holocaust and
                  Eichman had a major role in it.
                  (Sassen and Eichman actually fell out over this, Sassen was one of the original Holocaust deniers who wanted Eichman to confirm this. Eichman refused)
                  Why keep dragging old men and women out their nursing homes to try them for crimes they didn’t commit? This only draws attention to your conspiracy. Conspiracies don’t want attention, they want to stay hidden.
                  Pure goofiness, these are the words I use to describe Holocaust denial.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 1:25 pm

                • You reject the obvious facts – that’s not goofy, but insidious. Even if mine is silly, which is isn’t. People with MY view do not suppress YOUR ridiculous freedom of expression unlike people, especially jews harboring YOUR opinion. We don’t throw those with your nonsensical mindset into prison like you and yours do us to the tune of 19 countries – what are you guys afraid of? The truth? YOUR scenarios don’t make sense… OURS do or they wouldn’t be coming after us in these 19 countries or attempting to install laws to prohibit our expression of our views.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 1:38 pm

                • No, Diane, Holocaust denial is silly. Deniers can’t even keep their narrative straight…..never mind that none of it makes any sense whatsoever.
                  You are asking me to believe some kind of massive conspiracy….but none of it makes any sense. The alleged goals are confusing, the players are contradictory and make no sense and it has no goals that any sane person can figure out.
                  I actually disagree with laws against Holocaust denial. Better to let the disaffected, the Conspiracy Theorists, the lunatic fringe howl alone and forsaken than give them a stage to play on in a court. But, I don’t live in a country that has laws against it so I have no say anyway.
                  So yes, Diane, I agree with your and Jim’s right to spout crazy shit to your heart’s content.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 1:49 pm

                • Pure goofiness, these are the words I use to describe Holocaust denial.
                  Jeff

                  No Jeff, to describe Holohucksters like you.
                  The Holocaust happened because it happened yep that’s really good reasoning.
                  Too bad science doesn’t agree with you.
                  But voodoo magic seems to agree with you.
                  But no forensics or science to back what
                  you say…which one would you believe?
                  Remember Jeff, we don’t have to prove anything you on the other hand has to prove it happened like Benton Bradberry said you can’t prove a negative.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 23, 2016 @ 1:43 pm

                • Really, Jim?
                  The Poles proved the existence of cyanide in the gas chambers at Auschwitz. Even Leuchter found cyanide. Control samples taken from the barracks at Auschwitz found no evidence of cyanide, even these barracks were fumigated.
                  Oops.
                  Archeological probes at Belzec found mass graves, far in excess of what you expect for a “transit camp.”
                  Uh oh.
                  Archeological digs at Sobibor found the foundations of the gas chambers. These were concrete structures, in fact, the only concrete structures in the camp. All of the other buildings were made of wood.
                  Aw crap.
                  At all three death camps visitors typically find bone fragments all over the ground, especially after it rains.
                  Shoot.
                  There are others that I can bring up but I honestly need to get some things done around the house today.
                  I’m sure you will mock and sputter and scream “forgeries!!!!” And “Lies!!!! Liars!!!!!!!!!”
                  Go ahead Jim. Mocking it won’t make it all lies.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 2:09 pm

                • Must be a dementia issue in that I PURPOSELY MISSPELL HOLOCOST because of the COST to us and it IS a HOAX. That’s my version. So here is my mantra (but AGAIN, FOR THE POSSIBLY THIRD TIME regarding the spelling IT’S DELIBERATE).

                  HOLOCOSTOMANIA – Subscribing to the politically correct view of the holocost without question or discussion – rots the brain, corrupts the morals and creates a psychopath. The only cure is the truth provided by those who oppose and contend against the wholesale force feeding and consequent perversion of the myth of the holocost. (Diane King)

                  Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 12:37 pm

                • Is it something I said?
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 12:41 pm

                • dianeking-jrizzoli. Stating that Hitler had been too nice to Jews is a great offence to the … Nazis. So, you both are already on the black list of the NEUE GESTAPO presently located in Patagonia.

                  Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 23, 2016 @ 1:09 pm

                • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensborn

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 23, 2016 @ 1:56 pm

                • Jeff – Is it something I said?

                  No, it’s everything you said lol

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 23, 2016 @ 2:23 pm

                • I’m starting to feel like I’m talking to two granite walls.
                  These walls are adorned with Swastikas, pictures of a smiling Adolph Hitler and famous Joseph Goebbels quotes.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 2:32 pm

            • Jim, according to you, Hitler had the power to destroy a people at his whim – I guess you subscribe to the intentionalism school of thought then?

              ‘ Hitler should have just destroyed the whole lot and we wouldn’t have any of you here today” – so did you mean what you said when you also said ‘it’s not like we don’t like Jews’

              Comment by srebrenica — January 23, 2016 @ 3:42 pm

      • Yes, Wolf. I see that. Apparently because I don’t follow their warped way of thinking or admire Adolph Hitler and his policies I think like a Jew.
        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 9:18 am

        • Again, David Irving began to coin this phrase: “When you hear what the Germans did to the Jews, ask WHAT DID THE JEWS DO TO THE GERMANS?” There is a cause and a reason why 109 countries kicked the jews out (some more than once). (I know you claim they were asked back – seriously???? THAT truly is delusional — the BS detectors all over this forum should be going off with that statement.) I wish we could do this to our country, deport them. We’ve given (and still do) billions of dollars to Israel. I’d like to see some return on our dollar. If Israel is so wonderful, they should be sent there POST HASTE, to fully enjoy their stolen heritage, especially those with ‘dual citizenship’. (I heard that jews are leaving Israel as fast as they can as well.) This would summarily empty out most of the key offices in DC and around the country. Might be a different attitude (maybe even to some degree like Trump) if the jews weren’t given the pseudo-deferential treatment that they are.

          James Traficant stated while in office regarding every politician basically must ask, “How does it affect israel?” before things are done in this country.

          Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 11:41 am

          • Your point would work better if your video worked.
            Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew.

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 11:52 am

          • Had absolutely no problem with the video. Might be your internet.

            Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 1:04 pm

    • Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 2:20 pm

  14. Nope, reading THE BAD WAR, in the process and keep your condescending comments of bad manners to yourself. You clearly display your lack of upbringing (or maybe a product of the same) by responding to honest discourse with derision and attempted character assassination. I quote Spock in STAR TREK: INTO THE DARKNESS – “Reverting to name calling (derision) suggests that you are defensive and therefore, find my opinion valid.” (and I might add, CORRECT)

    Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 11:41 am

    • Diane

      When HoloHuxsters are losing the battle this is the only thing they can do. They can’t refute the facts with logic so they succumb to character assignations of good honest researchers.
      In my work as a revisionist, cable show producer, this is how they work ALL the time. Mainly made up of Jews with their stupid goy lackeys…..they are despicable and not honest people to deal with. They work to keep people from seeing the truth and any presentation of anything resembling the truth they work against it being seen or heard.
      I’ve dealt with these people for many years….their names might change but their MO stays the same. The Jews have formed a good group of internet troublemakers whose main job is to debunk Holocaust truthers like ourselves. The problem is more people are seeing thorough their clumsy laid out antics and actually are coming to the knowledge of the truth and thats why we are slowly defeating them. The problem is now these Jew troublemakers and their cronies are getting politicians on their side to change laws that make it a criminal offense to present the Holocaust truth on the internet or actually anywhere for that matter.
      So far they have convince 18 coward countries to give into their censorship laws. That fact alone should be enough to show that the Holohuxsters are wrong.
      You don’t make laws to stop debate on any topic but the Holohoax topic is the one they go after and have succeeded with.
      They are just bullies when it comes done to it. So we have our bullies and misinformation people here and have to deal with them.

      Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 12:02 pm

      • That’s funny, coming from you.
        You resort to vile stereotypes in your videos about Jews. Oh yes, Jim, I’ve seen how you portray Jews. Perhaps this is why you were taken off the air, not because of your views but how you portray those who disagree with you or how you portray Jews.
        There’s such a thing called “Community Standards.” Apparently your community saw fit to judge your standards and found them wanting.
        Hey pot, the kettle called.
        You’re black.
        Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 12:23 pm

        • It must be really bad if even one of their one declares it BOGUS – “Most of the memoirs and reports of Holocaust survivors are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…” –Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65

          BS has a short half life (like radiation) and then it disintegrates. Such is the fate of such stories and, indeed, the entire holocost narrative. It may take time, but more people will see it for what it is. So we continue to contend for and champion the truth.

          Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 3:49 pm

          • diane king. The stupidity of many survivors – chocked by events they went throough – is real fuel for your engine of negationism and hatred spraying.

            Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 23, 2016 @ 2:54 am

      • This is a first for me lol, being called a bully. I am an internet troublemaker who delights in debunking ‘Truthers’ like you two. I’m not bullying you, I’m just asking you to start proving your case by refuting some perpetrator testimony – so deal with me please

        Comment by srebrenica — January 21, 2016 @ 12:31 pm

        • I wrote about some of the “perpetrator” testimony on this page of my website: http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Mauthausen/Gas%20Chamber/Gas01.html

          I wrote about the Mauthausen gas chamber at https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/tag/mauthausen-gas-chamber/

          Comment by furtherglory — January 21, 2016 @ 3:05 pm

        • I consider those with their phony testimonials as ‘perpetrators’. Not that we need to ‘prove’ anything to you because you reject out of hand ANY AND EVERYTHING we say, so try this pithy comment on for size: “Most of the memoirs and reports of Holocaust survivors are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…” –Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65.

          Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 4:18 pm

      • Yes, Jim, and I believe the battling barrister, Doug Christie has quoted (if not created) the adage of “… isolate … marginalize, demonize, criminalize…” They can’t win the argument with a discussion or emotional outbursts or even name calling, derision and character assassination, so they attempt to criminalize our right to question THE SACRED HOLOCOST religion and punish the apostates (yes, we used to be believers too). Not only censor us, but try to wreak maximum destruction on our lives for DARING to question or DENY their precious “… white sepulcher full of dead man’s bones..” (Sounds like that’s where the ashes from the fictitious bazillion murdered and burned in Auschwitz ended up – that sepulcher …. ) but I digress…. holohoax.

        Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 3:54 pm

    • Nope, I’m simply telling the truth. The book sucked.
      Actually, Diane, I’m well-mannered and extremely courteous. I was raised by an old-world Irish Catholic East coast father who believed well-mannered children were the only way to go.
      However, my dealings with deniers on this blog and other places has roughened up the edges, so to speak.
      Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew.

      Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 12:13 pm

      • I think that there is hope for you yet, Jeff. Correct me if I am wrong, but it is my understanding that all your Holocaust knowledge comes from books. When you get your first look at Auschwitz, you will say “Something wrong.!” as Dr. Lee said at the O.J. trial.

        Comment by furtherglory — January 21, 2016 @ 12:29 pm

        • Thank you.
          I think.
          It is true I’ve never been to the sites themselves.
          I’ve always desperately wanted to go, not only to the camps in Poland but back to Europe. To see the landing site at Normandy, the trenches of the First World War, Rome, Athens, Paris, Berlin.
          All of these things fire the imagination, thinking of Napoleon, Ceasar, Bismarck.
          I envy your travels and hope to emulate them one day.
          I seriously need to get work done but I despise paperwork.
          Jeff

          Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 12:50 pm

        • Well there’s no hope for me then because I have been to a few camps and they just reinforced my views. I was in Sachsenhausen in October last year with my son.

          Comment by srebrenica — January 21, 2016 @ 1:18 pm

          • See
            And exactly what did you see there?
            Curious minds would like to know.

            Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 1:23 pm

            • Would you believe if told the truth, Jim?
              Or would it still be a lie?
              A forgery?
              Something that the Soviets cooked up? Or the Brits? Or the US? Perhaps something the Jewish Overlords built after the war to fool the goyim?
              Have YOU ever been to Europe to see the camps? Perhaps this would do you some good, yes?
              Inquiring minds want to know.
              Jeff

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 1:46 pm

              • Seeing the camps doesn’t necessarily make you an expert. In fact, I’ve heard some of the stupidest pronouncements from those who HAVE been there because they didn’t understand what they were (and were not) seeing. But how about some who have seen the camps, filmed the camps, those who refuse to hear the diatribe the tour guides recite in their tired Stepford-wife fashion, but rather determine to study the intricate details that constitute camp construction (indicated before the soviets remade them), taking samplings to submit to chemists and such! No, we haven’t been to Auschwitz and yet we have a greater understanding of what happened and did NOT happen there. Inquiring minds want to know? I don’t think so, not when the findings of so-called ‘inquiring minds’ are construed to defy the truth of chemistry and physics and the experts WHO HAVE BEEN THERE scientifically. Inquiring minds will come to the same conclusions we have.

                Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 4:15 pm

                • Seeing the camps doesn’t necessarily make you an expert but if you have already knowledge of what happened in a particular camp then it allows you to put that knowledge into context with what you are seeing with your own eyes.

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 22, 2016 @ 12:28 pm

                • I heard one women who said people went straight into the crematoriums…..I guess she couldn’t distinguish the “gas” chamber from a crematorium. But I guess it doesn’t matter to some people. Yikes that must of been a sight to see…..

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 22, 2016 @ 12:53 pm

                • Or what you THINK you ‘see’ or what you are told what you are seeing.

                  HOLOCOSTOMANIA – Subscribing to the politically correct view of the holocost without question or discussion – rots the brain, corrupts the morals and creates a psychopath. The only cure is the truth provided by those who oppose and contend against the wholesale force feeding and consequent perversion of the myth of the holocost. (Diane King)

                  Comment by Diane King — January 22, 2016 @ 2:36 pm

          • I’ve watched programs and seen the pictures.
            The concentration camps/death camps look like some of the coldest places on earth. I imagine the Soviet Gulags look the same.
            It’s good your son saw it. Mine are a little young, I have an 11-year-old and an 8-year-old. I’ll watch some of the programs on WW II but nothing on the Holocaust in front of them. I’d like to keep them innocent a little longer if I can. When the time comes I’ll talk to them about it but not now.
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 1:26 pm

            • Our tour guide at Sachsenhausen was excellent. He was very knowledgeable, and very few of the talks he gave were related to the Jewish prisoners in the camp because in this one they were in the minority, but still lowest in the camp prisoner hierarchy. Most of the inmates that were deliberately killed there were Russian POW’s. He also took us to a museum at the back of the main camp which documents the post war period when the Soviet’s interned over 60,000 Germans and murdered 12,500 at least by starving them to death. Most tours don’t visit this museum. The guide and his company include it in their tour because it helps to relate the whole history of the camp, and how basic human rights were violated by both the Nazi and Soviet regimes.

              Comment by srebrenica — January 22, 2016 @ 12:31 pm

              • I’m glad your guide brought up the Communist victims.
                It’s important we remember them as well.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 12:41 pm

          • I visited Sachsenhausen twice and wrote a whole section about the camp on my website at
            http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Sachsenhausen/index.html

            I wrote about the gas chamber at Sachsenhausen on my website at http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Sachsenhausen/ConcentrationCamp/GasChamber.html

            Comment by furtherglory — January 21, 2016 @ 3:21 pm

    • Though, and I’ve said this before, I will give you props for quoting Spock.
      I’m also a Star Trek fan.
      Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

      Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 12:17 pm

  15. FURTHERGLORY, jrizzoli/dianeking, other commentators. 1. The post war German Chancellors from Adenauer to Merkel knew and know better how to care the interest of New Germany. 2. After the bancruptcy of Prussian Military class and German/Aryan nationalism they followed policies to enter again in European and World political scene and catch the economical role their country deserved. 3. So they found it necessary to avoid any nationalist propaganda such as incitement against other peoples or denial of the mass murders comitted by the Nazi regime. The denial of the Holocaust had been evaluated as a first step of new hatred spraying as two centuries before the first German nationalists considered the Jews as “the internal enemy” and French, Poles, etc as “the external enemies” to fight and subdue. So, in order to stop troublemakers the denial of the Holocaust had to be considered as criminal offense. 4. Offering to grant payment of reasonable reparations for past wrongdoing Germany promoted the worldwide export of industrial products according the rule “once a customer, every time a customer”. In 1952 Adenauer granted Israel the summ of about $ 1.000.000.000 for purchasing, within 10 years, German industrial products. Now the relationship and commercial ties Germany-Israel is excellent. I do not know the details of other deals but nowadays the relationships of Germany with Poland (!), Russia (!), and other states are the best. With France there had been started a strong cooperation from the time of Adenauer and De Gaulle which had been enforced by Kohl and Mitterand. The German industry and banking sector are now leading in Europe. A result obtained banning hatred spraying speeches and an so.
    Now the German Chancellor – Frau Merkel – is considered the “Fuehrerin” of Europe. Clearly she wants to avoid in any possible way trouble making or so and avoid a future third bankruptcy like the two that had ruined Germany in WWI and WWII.
    So when some stupid persons are sentenced to prison – certainly not to Lager – so that is not Your business.
    Think instead that until 1968 or so in some USA States there had been a cruel racial discrimination against colourated people.. Or how easily police men shoot … colourated people. And jrizoli when spraying racial prejudice should remember that the name of his ancestors had RIZZOLI; certainly not of WASP origin.
    By the way. We have now to fear Arab terrorism. That is the result of the Crusades and what done by the crusaders. When in 1090 or so a certain PIERRE D’AMIEN – a foolish monk – and other hatred sprayers who preached to move war to liberate the HOLY GRAVE would have been imprisoned until they had kept silence for ever so it would be better for the world. The same applies to the stupid cartoonists who offended the Mohamed. You see that the FREE SPEECH ought to have its limits.
    Best.

    Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 21, 2016 @ 10:28 am

    • I’d like to add, Wolf, that the original reparations payments in 1952 were controversial in Isreal. Many Isrealis were opposed to taking what they considered to be blood money.
      Jeff

      Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 10:51 am

      • Yet this blood money is what it’s all about isn’t it and no one cares. The Jews walk off at all this money they spread all their lies.

        Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 10:54 am

        • MILLIONS of Germans died because of the money-hungry, avaricious jewish element bent on German destruction through fire bombing of over 160 German cities, irrational death sentences at Nuremberg, Allied executions without trials, rape, pillage, plunder, murder, sanctioned BY THE GOOD GUYS! Why? Fairy tales that would make the Grimm brothers shudder and Hans Christian Anderson roll over in his grave. The blood money derived from the massive lying agenda and this is what constitutes THE SHOAH BUSINESS – after all, there’s NO business like SHOAH business.

          Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 11:16 am

      • You can protest all you want when you KNOW the check is in the mail. Didn’t stop the payments. ANYBODY from Israel protesting receiving reparation money is like crocodile tears – likely merely for show.

        Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 11:18 am

      • JEFF. I remember the debates but those payments permitted Israel an economic growth necessary for its survival in midd of the many enemies. For Germany, granting reasonable reparations – for much higher losses – resulted a political and economical advantage and it is now the leading power in Europe.

        Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 22, 2016 @ 2:59 am

        • The reparations also covered the cost of resettling survivors.
          So, if this was all about money, wouldn’t Isreal want to claim additional survivors?

          Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 5:12 am

    • No amount of endorsement of the jewish thievery and extortion can justify it. And NOTHING can justify suppression of freedom of speech. It’s either freedom of speech for all or it’s not freedom of speech AT ALL.

      Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 11:21 am

      • KING.RIZZOLI. Freedom of speech or of hatred spraying? Besides, i note You are well assessed in the Shoah Business Negationist Division.

        Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 22, 2016 @ 3:03 am

        • Bravo, Wolf.
          I’ve never thought of deniers being part of “Shoah Business” but they are. They sell their books, hold their meetings and have websites. Every time I’ve visited one of their websites I get hit up for donations.
          They make their money but hate it when real historians make money off books and videos.
          Jeff

          Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 5:09 am

    • wolf wrote: “You see that the FREE SPEECH ought to have its limits.”

      I agree with you on that, wolfie. Free speech shouldn’t be allowed for Jews. Kikes have used the free speech thing to destroy the White nations. They have distorted the Anglo-Saxon concept of free speech, first intended to liberate the Anglo-Saxons from feudal domination and later used to put them under Jewish domination. That’s a great example of the way a good idea can be distorted and diverted to a path 100% contrary to its original purpose. Or perhaps that was originally just a terrible idea, bearing in itself the seeds of its own destruction. Free speech for Jews amounts to allowing a pedophile to try to attract kids in his van with candies only because that would be too inhumane & cruel to restrict his freedom to do it. Any sane father should kick that guy out of his neighborhood before the latter finally succeeds in bringing a kid in his van. The NAMBLA is the outcome of the deadly logic of distorted freedom in America.

      Comment by hermie — January 22, 2016 @ 6:56 am

      • HERMIE. I repeat, your ancestry is under investigation by the NEUE GESTAPO established in Patagonia. So I have been informed by a friend. Indeed, converted and descendants, thoroughly watched by the Holy Inquisistion since centuries, had and have to perform in special anti Semitism hatred in speeches and writings. So all the negationists are now considered suspect having Jewish ancestry and so do not qualify for Neo Nazi Party membership.

        Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 22, 2016 @ 8:59 am

        • Wolf wrote: “HERMIE. I repeat, your ancestry is under investigation by the NEUE GESTAPO established in Patagonia. ”

          Stop making a fool of yourself, woofie. Unnecessary. Everybody has already seen that you’re just a dumb airhead and emotional fag.

          Comment by hermie — January 26, 2016 @ 5:07 am

  16. Hermie, you tell me not to be so gullible and yet you swallow the whole “Hitler wanted peace in 1939.”
    Talk about gullible.
    If Hitler wanted peace:
    Why the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact with the Soviet Union? Part of the pact was an agreement to split Poland between Germany and the USSR. If Hitler really wanted peace why would he agree to do this? Why not just an agreement for the USSR to remain neutral in case of war?
    I can answer that Hermie. Hitler wanted war but he did not want to fight the USSR, at least, not at that time. The price of Soviet neutrality was 1/2 of Poland, plus an agreement to delineate spheres of interest.
    You brought up Hitler’s “offer.” Why rush? The normal way diplomacy works is both sides get together and compromise. This takes time. Hitler never truly “offered” the Poles anything……he simply ordered the Poles to send him plenipotentiaries with the ability to agree to his offer, not negotiate anything.
    What about Hitler’s plans to invade Poland on August 26th? Doesn’t sound peaceful to me. As I’ve stated repeatedly, German troops actually invaded Polish territory on the 26th when the halt order failed to get through to some of the border units.
    I agree that the British guarantee in the Spring of 1939 made the Poles unlikely to negotiate. However, they considered the Corridor their territory and I understand their unwillingness to give it up.
    No, I think Hitler simply made a mistake. Hitler never believed that the French and British would go to war over Poland. Hitler believed that the treaty he signed with the USSR would discourage Western interference.
    BTW, you make it sound like the British led Hitler around by the nose, pushing him towards war. I always gave Hitler credit for being smarter than that but according to you he was just a rube.
    Tell me again, why do you admire the rube?
    Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

    Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 8:50 am

    • Simply put, Hitler wanted peace in 1939, and to attempt to ensure that, he thought he could make an agreement with one of the alleged Allies so the others wouldn’t bother pursuing a ridiculous war. Hitler wanted to rescue the survivors of over 50,000 polish murders of Germans. He didn’t want a war with Britain, never did. He made dozens of peace overtures that were rejected by the British leadership who had to bow to their jewish masters. … simply put.

      Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 11:11 am

      • As I understand it Britain had the opportunity to accept peace from the Germans but they rejected it becasue they wanted to get the United States into the war which they did.

        Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 11:23 am

      • Wait, did you just type “50,000 Polish murders of Germans?”
        Oh my.
        Diane, Nazi Germany and Poland got along quite well in the 1930’s, up until the Spring of 1939.
        Now, I’m assuming that the Poles didn’t whack all the 50,000 in one go, they probably spread them out.
        So, why wasn’t this an issue with the Nazi Government up until the Spring of 1939?
        Well, for one, the Poles never murdered 50,000 ethnic Germans.
        Now, to be fair, the Poles did murder around 7,000 ethnic Germans….but this was after the invasion.
        Now, the Poles were somewhat infamous for their treatment of their ethnic minorities in the prewar years, primarily Jews, Ukrainians and their ethnic Germans. This was, oddly enough, a bigger issue with Weimar Germany. The Weimar Government did protest the treatment of ethnic Germans in the Corridor and Danzig. This mistreatment was of the discriminatory type, with Poles getting preferential treatment, that sort of thing.
        I’ll remind you that Hitler signed a Non-Aggession Treaty with the Poles in 1934. Apparently the Polish treatment of ethnic Germans didn’t bother him that much, but, Hitler, as an Austrian, had a bigger problem with the Czechs.
        So, for Hitler, alleged mistreatment only became an issue once the Poles refused to give him what he wanted.
        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 11:46 am

        • Ignorance run amok … try to get off your high horse enough to understand you don’t have it all….figured out.

          THE POLISH ATROCITIES AGAINST THE GERMAN MINORITY IN POLAND , EDITED AND PUBLISHED BY ORDER OF THE FOREIGN OFFICE AND BASED UPON DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE SECOND REVISED EDITION BERLIN 1940 Compiled by Hans Schadewaldt VOLK UND REICH VERLAG BERLIN: More than 58,000 Dead and Missing – were lost by the German minority in Poland during the days of their liberation from the Polish yoke, as far as can be ascertained at present. The Polish nation must for all time be held responsible for this appalling massacre consequent upon that Polish reign of terror. Up to November 17, 1939, the closing day for the documentary evidence contained in the first edition of this book, 5,437 murders, committed by members of the Polish armed forces and by Polish civilians on men, women and children of the German minority had already been irrefutably proved. It was quite apparent even then that the actual number of murders far exceeded this figure, and by February 1, 1940, the total number of identified bodies of the German minority had increased to 12,857. Official investigations carried out since the outbreak of the German-Polish war have shown that to these 12,857 killed there must be added more than 45,000 missing, all of whom must be accounted dead since no trace of them can be found. Thus the victims belonging to the German minority in Poland already now total over 58,000. Even this appalling figure by no means covers the sum total of the losses sustained by the German minority. There can be no doubt at all that investigations which are still being conducted will disclose many more thousand dead and wounded. The following description of the Polish atrocities which is not only confined to murders and mutilations but includes other deeds of violence such as maltreatment, rape, robbery and arson applies to only a small section of the terrible events for which irrefutable and official evidence is here established.

          Within 2 days (5 Sept 1939), the issues involving the human rights of German minorities as well as disputes over Danzig and isolated East Prussia would turn into WWII. From the beginning, the civilian population feels the impact of the invasion. As casualties mount, Polish citizens, with the full support of their miliary, hunt down ANY German still in Poland. Following the invasion, there is a wave of house searches, as the Germans are beaten and raped and at least 5,000 murdered. The massacres, especially in the city of Bromberg, will be hidden from the history books. They will eventually emerge as one of the most heinous of crimes to be inflicted upon a civilian population.

          Danzig, 16 September 1939. Hitler: “As a soldier in the World War, who only fought in the west, I never had the opportunity to witness such deeds. The thousands of slaughtered Volksgennossen, the brutally butchered women and children, the countless German soldiers and officers who fell wounded in the hands of the enemy and who were massacred and bestially mutilated with their eyes gouged out and worse yet, the Polish government has openly admitted this in a radio broadcast. The Luftwaffe soldiers that were forced to parachute were to be killed in a cowardly fashion.”

          Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 4:01 pm

          • Wait a second, are you honestly quoting German propaganda to me????????!!!!!!???????
            That’s hysterical, Diane.
            I think when I get a moment I’ll dredge up some Communist Propaganda and quote it to you.
            BTW, I already mentioned that the Poles killed ethnic Germans after the Germans invaded. This is not news to me.
            There is not a chance in hell the number was 50,000. For one thing, the Germans advanced so fast there was no TIME for the Poles to kill that many.
            Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 7:18 pm

            • The reason Hitler invaded Poland, if you read the narrative, as you claim you do, was because of the violent abuse of the ethnic Germans there. Sheesh!

              Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 7:24 pm

              • No Diane, Hitler did not invade Poland to save his poor oppressed German brethren.
                He invaded Poland because the Poles refused to play ball, giving the Germans back their old territory in exchange for an alliance and possible Soviet territory for the future.
                Hitler didn’t care about the Germans in Poland….until it became expedient for him to do so.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 8:02 pm

                • That’s a gross misjudgment. YOU don’t know Hitler’s motivation! He was extremely concerned about what was happening to Germans in other lands. It was horrid and extensive. Again, “So given that Poles are committing atrocities against the German minority in Poland, Hitler is now facing a very tough situation. Basically, it’s: Alright, if I don’t declare war on Poland, if I don’t go in and help these Germans out, well, then the German minorities are just going to keep getting slaughtered. It’s not an insignificant amount of Germans in that area who were being killed. It was pretty bad what was going on, what the Poles were doing in that area. So, he was basically saying, “Well, if we don’t go in, then those Germans are just going to keep getting slaughtered. If we go in, we’re going to find ourselves at war with Poland, France and Britain and possibly the Soviet Union.” … 1 September 1939: The applause reached the Fuhrer, who had just arrived to address the Reichstag which has been called for an extraordinary session. Hitler: Danzig was and is a German city. Have only Germany to thank for their cultural development. I told the Polish ambassador 3 weeks ago that if the situation continues as it was, if Danzig was persecuted and was attempted, by Poland, to ruin Danzig economically, the situation could not be tolerated.”

                  We are encouraged to make the WORST spin about the National Socialists, especially Hitler. I wouldn’t.

                  Oh, and here is a video Jim and his brother, Joe did in critiquing an article about “Izzy”, a ridiculous account from the perpetually unquestioned survivor stories: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQtNvOBOE_8 (Appeared in the BOSTON GLOBE).

                  Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 8:22 pm

                • So, when did this persecution start, Diane? Did it start when Hitler signed the Non-Aggression Pact with Poland in 1934? The Spring of 1939? August of 1939?
                  So, Hitler risked a World War to rescue his poor German brethren? I always though Hitler was more of a pragmatist.
                  If so, how does the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact fit into this? Did Hitler agree to give the Soviets 1/2 of Poland out of the goodness of his heart? Wouldn’t that put his poor German brethren at risk?
                  Really?
                  Do you realize how ridiculous this sounds? Hitler invading Poland to save the poor ethnic Germans?
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 8:48 pm

                • Do you realize how ridiculous this sounds? Hitler invading Poland to save the poor ethnic Germans?

                  Yes Jeff that is why Hitler went into Poland…..
                  As much as you don’t want to except it.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 9:00 pm

                • No Jim. The idea is ridiculous.
                  I’ve already stated my reasons why.
                  I’ve noticed that you and Diane skate over the fact that Poland and Hitler’s Germany enjoyed a very good relationship until the Spring of 1939.
                  I also note that you skip over the Molotov-Ribbontrop Pact. Wouldn’t giving 1/2 of Poland by extension place ethnic Germans living in Eastern Poland in the clutches of Stalin? Did Hitler not care about these Germans?
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 9:16 pm

                • I don’t see where you come off claiming Germany and Poland had a good relationship. I don’t think so, not from what I’ve read. In fact, that possibility was the first time I’ve even heard it mentioned. I’ve discussed the pact between Hitler and Stalin was Hitler’s attempt to keep the other allies interested in a war while he was trying to take care of the polish mistreatment of the Germans. Do we know ALL that was in the pact regarding the Germans in the East?

                  “1939 The Polish Conflict: Problems had arisen in Poland over access to the German territory of East Prussia and the costal city of Danzig. Hitler on several occasions presented proposals to try and resolve both situations peaceably, but the Poles refused to seriously negotiate. Now in Poland, just as in Czechoslovakia, the safety of ethnic Germans was again becoming a concern for Hitler.

                  “Danzig: Until 1934, conflicts between Germany and Poland smouldered. Danzig, next to East Prussia, had been completely cut off from the Reich. Warsaw continued to try to wrest total control over the strategically important harbor city. In West Prussia, the situation was similar. East Prussia was now completely cut off from the German Reich. Bolstered by English and French guarantees of war support, Poland has no further incentive to negotiate in good faith with Germany. In the meantime, in Warsaw, maps are suddenly starting to circulate, which contain a new western Polish border, extending to just west of Berlin.

                  “All across Poland, the so-called pogroms against the minorities begin. Night after night, Polish border officials shot at the fleeing Germans (their homes being burned). Shortly before the official outbreak of war, there were already 80,000 ethnic Germans in refugee camps in both Danzig and the German border area. The misery of the minority Germans in Poland had now developed the third and most pressing reason that would lead to the outbreak of war.”

                  Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 9:42 pm

                • To Diane, Hermie and Jim
                  This article explains Polish-German relations from 1933. I’ve copied and pasted the relevant passages, however, I’ve also added the appropriate link at the bottom. This article basically summarizes what I’ve read in other articles and books.

                  German-Polish non-aggression pact ushered in a transformation of relations between Berlin and Warsaw as complete as the one that had taken place between Germany and the Soviet Union. There were of course still points of tension and difficulty between the former antagonists, but from January 1934 onwards every effort was made, on both sides, to deal with contentious issues relating to Danzig or minority and economic questions in a spirit of friendship and cooperation. In political terms the pact provided an additional stimulus to the developing Franco-Soviet schemes for the containment of Germany, the chief element of which, the proposed Eastern Pact, in turn provided the first fruitful field for German-Polish diplomatic collaboration against Bolshevik Russia. The so-called ‘Eastern Locarno’, which French and Soviet foreign ministers Louis Barthou and Maxim Litvinov devised during 1933-34, was essentially a scheme to base a multilateral security agreement around a Franco-Soviet alliance directed against Germany. Although Germany was invited to participate in the proposed agreement, which, in view of its fundamental aim made little sense without it, it held no attraction for Hitler, particularly as it was so transparently designed to restrict Germany’s freedom of manoeuvre in eastern Europe and thus check any plans for territorial expansion in that region. From mid-1934 onwards, when the proposals were officially communicated to the interested powers, the Germans, backed by Poland, whose leaders were disillusioned with France and fearful of Soviet encroachments, continued to raise objections to the form of the pact when in essence it was the very principle they opposed.43 As Hitler told Sir John Simon in March 1935, to the German mind the Eastern Pact was superfluous in view of the security arrangements, such as the German-Polish agreement, which already existed between the states of central and eastern Europe. Moreover, the proposed pact was cumbersome and even dangerous as, unlike the Locarno treaties, it was ‘intended for a large number of States with
                  unpredictable interests and antagonisms, internal
                  uncertainties and fluctuating Governments’. It might thus engender a ‘much larger variety of conflicts’, which equally might force him to ‘lead the German people to the slaughter for territories in which they had no interest at all’.44
                  Apart from their cooperation with the Poles over the Eastern Pact, the position of Poland in German schemes against the USSR began to crystallize
                  when, during his visit to Warsaw in early 1935, and
                  on several subsequent occasions, Goring made
                  soundings about the possibility of a German-Polish alignment against Russia.46 Despite the Polish response being not especially encouraging, Hitler did not abandon his efforts to persuade Poland to join an antiSoviet combination and in later years
                  Berlin actively sought its participation in the Anti-Comintern Pact. In August 1935, during a general outline of his foreign policy plans, the chancellor spoke of an ‘eternal’ alliance with Britain, German expansion to the east and the maintenance of a
                  ‘good relationship’ with Poland, thus registering once more that, if Poland played its part, it had nothing to fear from Germany, but might, by inference, gain substantially from its association with the Reich.47 That was certainly the impression of
                  the American military attache in Berlin, Truman Smith, who in November 1935 noted that, provided future German conquests in the USSR were effected on a sufficiently grand scale, it might be possible to compensate Poland with territory in the Ukraine in
                  return for which it might ‘cede the Corridor and permit Germany a land empire in northern and central Russia’.48 These ideas were evidently less fanciful than they might now appear for this was more or less the scheme that Goring had been
                  instructed to suggest to Pilsudski in January 1935.
                  …By that stage the diplomatic revolution in German policy towards Poland and the USSR was complete. The German-Soviet combination of the Weimar era had collapsed, or, to be strictly accurate, had been deliberately laid to rest by the new regime in Berlin. Germany now had a new friend in eastern Europe, Pilsudski’s Poland, with which it shared a loathing for Bolshevik Russia and in collaboration with which it eventually succeeded in thwarting the proposed ‘Eastern Locarno’. The focus of Hitler’s plans for collaboration against the USSR, however, was fixed not so much on the minor powers of the east as on
                  the great powers of western Europe, and concerned principally the British Empire.

                  http://world-news-research.com/HitlerStalin2.html

                  I am now going to bed.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 10:50 pm

                • http://www.amazon.com/Myth-German-Villainy-Benton-Bradberry/dp/1477231838/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1453493246&sr=1-1&keywords=the+myth+of+german+villainy

                  THE MYTH OF GERMAN VILLAINY, Benton Bradberry: Chapter 18 – War with Poland

                  The international jubilation over the peace pact between Prime Minister Chamberlain and Chancellor Hitler resulting from the Munich Agreement, did not last for long. Public opinion outside Germany soon began to cool again and turn against Hitler and the Nazis; the result of the relentless anti-Hitler, anti-Nazi propaganda. Propaganda is a powerful weapon and it was used to its fullest potential to turn public opinion against Nazi Germany, and to create pretexts for war, both in Britain and the United States. This hate campaign was controlled and managed mainly by the Jews who spared no effort to undermine the Nazi regime. British historian Nesta Webster wrote in her book, Germany and England, published in 1938, shortly before World War II began: “Britons in the past have not been easily worked up to hate, but this insane hatred of two men, Mussolini and Hitler, is being instilled in them by the Jews and those who benefit by them, and acting like a poison in the life blood of our people. Germany is under a visible anti-Jewish dictatorship. We are under an invisible Jewish dictatorship, but a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life, for no one can escape from it. Already the Jews can make or break the career of any man as they please. Once war breaks out we cannot doubt that they will be found in every key position and will hold us at their mercy. Then the real purpose of the world war will become apparent. As long as the Jews do not hold Germany they can never realize their final aim –world domination. Therefore Hitler must be overthrown and Jewish power restored.”(emphasis added) In this atmosphere of hate, distrust and bellicosity created by the anti-Hitler propaganda, the Western leaders were preconditioned to take the worst possible interpretation of any foreign policy initiative by Hitler. He had been made out to be an aggressive psychopath by the Jewish press and was therefore given no credit for having legitimate claims for Germany. After the Munich conference, personal control of British foreign policy passed from Prime Minister Chamberlain to his Foreign Minister, Lord Halifax, who thereafter waged a relentless campaign to provoke a war with Germany. Halifax and certain British leaders on both the left and the right joined together to castigate Hitler and the Nazis and push for war. Principle among these was Sir Robert Vansittart, Chief Diplomatic Advisor to the British Government, who made anti-Nazi radio broadcasts. Vansittart’s radio broadcasts were intended to awake the British public to “The Nature of the Beast”—to the habits of militarism, aggression and blind obedience which, according to Vansittart, had been inculcated into the Germans since the time of Tacitus, and which made them uniquely dangerous to their neighbors. Vansittart used the metaphor of the butcherbird he had observed years before on the Black Sea, ruthlessly eliminating its unsuspecting prey one by one. In Vansittart’s view, Nazism was no aberration but the logical outcome of German history. Vansittart and the others characterized each foreign policy move by Hitler as a new “surprise”and declared that he could not be trusted and had to be “stopped.”Vansittart’s broadcasts were very effective in inflaming British public opinion against Germany. In reality, Hitler had made it clear from the beginning of his chancellorship that he intended to reclaim those territories taken away from Germany by the Versailles Treaty. His plan for a single German state that would include all Germans was also made clear from the beginning. “Ein Reich, ein volk, ein fuhrer ,”(one country, one people, one leader) he repeated again and again. So far, he had remilitarized the Rhineland, annexed Austria, and annexed the Sudetenland —all peacefully. The majority German city of Memel had also been returned to East Prussia from Lithuania. The only remaining pieces of the puzzle were Danzig and the Polish Corridor. It was obvious that they were next on the agenda. Hitler had already made that clear. But he also renounced any claim to the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine which had been returned to France at the end of World War I. Hitler stated his plan clearly and then followed that plan, step-by-step, precisely as he said he would do. Moreover, numerous world statesmen, journalists and academics concurred with Hitler’s demand for reclamation of these German territories, and declared that his demands were both reasonable and just. The Versailles Treaty was based on the “War Guilt”clause which assigned blame for starting WWI to Germany. Revisionist historians had already disproved the war guilt allegation against Germany, so there was no longer any basis for the onerous terms of the Versailles Treaty and it should have been scrapped long before Hitler was elected to office. It was simply disingenuous for Churchill, Halifax, Vansittart, and the other members of the British “war party”to characterize Hitler’s moves as “aggression”or “surprises.”To say that his word could not be trusted was not true. The Polish Problem The Versailles Treaty had taken a large swath of German territory, along with its German inhabitants, to create the new sovereign state of Poland. This included a strip of land across Germany to give Poland access to the Baltic Sea, called the Polish Corridor. The main problem of the Corridor was that it split Germany in two, separating East Prussia from the rest of Germany. For Germans to travel back and forth between East Prussia and the rest of Germany, they were required to go around the Corridor by ship. They were not allowed to cross the Corridor. The German City of Danzig had also been taken from Germany and placed under the supervision of the League of Nations as a “free city”for the purpose of providing Poland with her port facilities. Around one and a half million ethnic Germans now lived as second class citizens in this Polish controlled territory. This territory, along with its residents, had been German for centuries and its people made it clear from the start through countless mass demonstrations that they did not want to be separated from Germany. Danzig had been a member of the old Hanseatic League, and was one of the most German of German cities. It’s population was 96 percent German, and in a plebiscite they voted overwhelmingly to be returned to Germany. The ethnic Germans living in this region were now a minority in a hostile Polish state, under Polish rule, and suffered the same kind of discrimination and repression that the Germans had suffered in the Sudetenland. Germany had a just claim for the return of all of the territory taken from it by force by the Versailles Treaty, and many world leaders openly acknowledged that. A prominent British authority on Germany and German affairs, William Harbutt Dawson, wrote in “Germany Under the Treaty,”1933: “…no factor in the life of Europe today offers so grave and certain a menace to peace than the Corridor, which cuts Germany into two parts, and severs Danzig, one of the most German of cities, from the fatherland. Can Europe afford to ignore this menace and allow matters to drift? To do so would be tantamount to inviting and hastening catastrophe, for instead of improving, the conditions in the Corridor after and because of 12 years of Polish occupation, are steadily growing worse. Because it is now abundantly clear that all the needs of Polish trade, present and future, can be satisfied without the corridor, and because good relations between Germany and Poland, which are so essential to the settlement of peace in Europe, will be impossible so long as that political monstrosity continues. The greater part of the territory should go back to the country to which it owes its civilization.”Halifax and the “war party,”however, refused to acknowledge the justification of Germany’s claims, and characterized each of Hitler’s revanchist actions as naked aggression and proof of his intent to take over the world. They claimed that he even had designs on Britain itself. There was no basis in fact for either of these claims. President Roosevelt was at the same time, preposterously warning the American people of a possible German invasion of the United States through South America.

                  Hitler’s Proposal to Poland Poland had traditionally harbored hostile feelings towards Germany and for all German people, so Hitler proceeded with caution in attempting to settle this last territorial dispute. He was moderate in his approach and displayed considerable generosity in recognizing Polish interests. British Ambassador to Berlin, Sir Neville Henderson, acknowledged Hitler’s reasonable approach. “Of all the Germans,”Henderson said, “believe it or not, Hitler is the most moderate as far as Danzig and the Corridor are concerned.”On October 24, 1938, Hitler had his foreign minister, von Ribbentrop, propose the following four step plan to Polish Ambassador Lipski that would have rectified the injustices of the Versailles Treaty and which should also have eliminated all sources of friction between Poland and Germany. 1). The return of the Free City of Danzig to the Reich, but without severance of its economic ties to the Polish State. This offer would guarantee to Poland free port privileges in the city of Danzig, as well as extra-territorial access to the harbor. 2.) Germany would make no demand for the return of its former territory, now called the Polish Corridor, but Germany should be allowed to build a highway and a railroad across the Polish Corridor in order to reunite Germany with East Prussia. 3.) Mutual recognition of the location of the borders between Germany and Poland would be permanently settled. In other words, Germany would not demand return of any remaining territory ceded to Poland by the Versailles Treaty. 4.) The German-Polish Pact of 1934 would be extended from ten to twenty-five years. (In the German-Polish Pact of 1934, both countries pledged to resolve their problems through bilateral negotiations and to forgo armed conflict for a period of 10 years. The pact effectively normalized relations between Poland and Germany, which were previously strained by border disputes arising from the Treaty of Versailles.) In his negotiations with Poland, Hitler could not have been more reasonable. Kristalnacht While these negotiations were going on an unfortunate event known as “Kristaslnacht”(night of broken glass) occurred in Germany which had the effect of further turning international public opinion against Germany. It could not have occurred at a worse time. The trigger for Kristalnacht was the murder of the German diplomat, Ernst vom Rath, in Paris by a young Jewish man named Herschel Grynszpan, on November 9, 1938. Grynszpan’s family, along with approximately 15,000 other Jews who had entered Germany from Poland after 1914, and who were not German citizens, had been expelled out of Germany back to Poland on October 27, 1938. Seventeen year old Herschel Grynszpan, who was living in Paris with an uncle at the time, shot and killed vom Rath inside the German Embassy in revenge for the deportations, though vom Rath personally had nothing to do with it. News of the murder was in all the German papers. Anti-Jewish feeling was already running high as a result of the Jewish “holy war”against Germany, and the German people reacted angrily over vom Rath’s murder. On the nights of November 9 and 10, gangs of youths roamed through the Jewish neighborhoods breaking windows of Jewish businesses and homes and setting fire to synagogues. Uniformed SA men also participated. The official German position on these events was that these were spontaneous outbursts of angry German citizens over the murder of a German diplomat by a Jew, but the international Jewish press accused Nazi officials, specifically Goebbels, of orchestrating the event. That seems doubtful, however, because early in the morning following the Kristalnacht events, Dr. Goebbels announced in a radio broadcast that any action against Jews was strictly prohibited and warned of severe penalties for disobeying this order. Numerous people were also arrested for violence against Jews. Government and Nazi Party officials were furious over what had happened because of the negative propaganda against Germany which would obviously follow. Hitler was also furious when he first heard about it and ordered a telex message to be sent to all Gauleiter offices, which read: “By express order from the very highest authority, arson against Jewish businesses or other property must in no case and under no circumstances take place.”Unfavorable international reaction was impossible to avoid, and popular opinion of Nazi Germany declined dramatically as a result of Kristalnacht. The British historian, Martin Gilbert, himself a Jew, writes that “no event in the history of German Jews between 1933 and 1945 was so widely reported as it was happening, and the accounts from the foreign journalists working in Germany sent shock waves around the world.”The Times of London wrote at the time: “No foreign propagandist bent upon blackening Germany before the world could outdo the tale of burnings and beatings, of blackguardly assaults on defenseless and innocent people, which disgraced that country yesterday.”There was no need to exaggerate what had happened. The violent rampage against Germany’s Jews was truly a disgrace. But in typical fashion, the international Jewish press did exaggerate the event out of all proportion to what actually happened, providing their usual “eye witness”accounts. An orgy of brutal beatings, rapes, and murder of large numbers of innocent Jews all across Germany, as well as extensive damage to Jewish property was alleged. These exaggerated reports had the effect of poisoning international public opinion against Germany, as they were intended to do. Yet, it makes no sense that the German government or the Nazi Party could have orchestrated this pogrom, as the negative publicity resulting from it hurt Germany and the Nazis far more than it did the Jews. Already sensitive to the hysterical anti-Nazi propaganda campaign being waged against them, German officials were being very careful not to create incidents, such as Kristalnacht, for which they could be criticized further. It is more likely that Kristalnacht was a spontaneous pogrom against the Jews, caused by the buildup of hostility over the International Jewish “holy”war against Germany, and triggered by the vom Rath murder. In the aftermath of Kristalnacht, the world press became overwhelmingly sympathetic to the Jews, and bitterly hostile towards Germany. In France, Britain and the United States, calls for war against Germany became increasingly bellicose as a result of Kristalnacht. German-Polish Talks Continue On January 5, 1939, Poland’s Foreign Minister, Josef Beck, met with Hitler at Berchtesgaden. Hitler reiterated to Beck a clear and definite guarantee that Germany would make no claims on the Polish Corridor, and reaffirmed that he only wanted to build a railroad and a highway across it. The following day, January 6th, in a meeting with Polish officials in Munich, von Ribbentrop confirmed Germany’s willingness to guarantee, not only the Corridor, but all Polish territory. This friendly, generous offer was repeated again by von Ribbentrop during a state visit to Warsaw on January 23, 1939. During this state visit von Ribbentrop appealed for a final all-inclusive settlement of German-Polish territorial points of contention. A settlement in accord with the “four points”outlined above would have taken nothing away from Poland. Danzig was not a Polish city, but a “free city,”supervised by the League of Nations. Germany’s four point offer would have permitted Poland to continue to use Danzig’s port facilities, as before. Germany did not demand a return of its lost territory, now known as the Polish Corridor, only the right to build a highway and a railroad across it in order to reconnect with East Prussia. There was nothing unreasonable in Germany’s demands. Yet, on March 21, 1939 French President LeBrun and British Prime Minister Chamberlain met in London and proposed a French-British-Polish alliance to contain Germany. This proposal was then sent on to Polish officials, which had the effect of further steeling their resistance to Hitler’s demands. Despite Germany’s best diplomatic efforts, the Poles were now refusing to concede anything. The popular view today is that an overwhelmingly powerful Germany was threatening and intimidating a weak and impotent Poland, but in reality, that was hardly the case. Poland had a long military tradition and maintained a powerful, well trained army. The Polish army had only recently (1920) defeated the Russian “Red”army. Polish military leaders were not in the least intimidated by the power of Germany. It should be remembered that German armed forces had been reduced to only 100,000 men by the Versailles Treaty, and that Germany at the time of the crisis with Poland was still in the process of rebuilding her military forces. Not only was Poland not intimidated by Germany, she was even belligerent.

                  These Polish tanks were the equal of anything in the German army. In October 1930, the influential Polish newspaper, Die Liga der Grossmacht , carried the following declaration: “A struggle between Poland and Germany is inevitable. We must prepare ourselves for it systematically. Our goal is a new Grunewald (The Battle of Tannenberg on July 15th, 1410 when the Teutonic Knights were defeated). However, this time a Grunewald in the suburbs of Berlin. “That is to say, the defeat of Germany must be produced by Polish troops in the centre of the territory in order to strike Germany to the heart. Our ideal is a Poland with the Oder and the Neisse as a border in the West. Prussia must be re-conquered for Poland, and indeed, Prussia as far as the Spree. “In a war with Germany there will be no prisoners and there will be room neither for human feelings nor cultural sentiments. The world will tremble before the German-Polish War. We must evoke in our soldiers a superhuman mood of sacrifice and a spirit of merciless revenge and cruelty.”At around the same time, Poland’s Marshall Rydz-Smigly said, “Poland wants war with Germany and Germany will not be able to avoid it even if she wants to.” Edvard Rydz-Smigly, Marshall of Poland Jews influence both Roosevelt and Churchill As the result of restrictions placed on them in Nazi Germany, Jews involved in theater and the movie business left Germany en masse for Hollywood where they were quickly made welcome by the Jews who ran the motion picture industry. These German émigré Jews then joined the Hollywood Jews in making anti-Nazi movies (usually with pro-Communist undertones) for American audiences. The stereotype Nazi officer, complete with monocle, cigarette holder, arch aristocratic manner, impeccable uniform, erect, arrogant bearing, and an evil sneer or a sinister smile on his haughty face, became a stock character in these movies. The mass information and entertainment media in Britain and the United states was almost entirely under Jewish control, so a very one-sided picture of events in Germany was presented to the British and American people. Hitler and the members of his Nazi government were relentlessly smeared as guttersnipes, murderers and psychopaths, in total contradiction of the actual facts, thus public opinion in both countries was turned against Nazi Germany. In 1940 and 1941 appeared Jewish made, pro-war films such as Charlie Chaplin’s burlesque of Hitler and Mussolini, The Great Dictator, as well as Man Hunt, directed by German Jewish émigré Fritz Lang, The Mortal Storm, A Yank in the R.A.F., Sergeant York, I Married a Nazi and numerous other such movies. These movies were an integral part of the vigorous campaign by various elements to get the United States into a war with Germany. Once the United States was at war with Germany, the studios churned out one anti-Nazi potboiler after another. An audience today is likely to snicker at such “classics”as Hillbilly Blitzkrieg, Women in Bondage, The Devil with Hitler, I Escaped from the Gestapo, Hitler’s Children, That Nazi Nuisance, Strange Death of Adolf Hitler, Enemy of Women, Hitler’s Madman, The Master Race, The Hitler Gang, Hotel Berlin and Tarzan Triumphs. A summary of the plot of Tarzan Triumphs will illustrate the flavor of these potboilers. Nazi agents parachute into Tarzan’s peaceful kingdom and occupy a fortress, hoping to exploit oil and tin. Johnny Weissmuller, a slightly flabby but still commanding noble savage, rallies his natives (all of whom are white) against the Axis. “Kill Nadzies!”Tarzan commands the natives. They nod eagerly. The Germans are so despicable even the animals turn against them. Tarzan chases the head of the Nazi troops into the jungle, and, just as the fear-crazed German officer frantically signals Berlin on his shortwave radio, Tarzan kills him. In Berlin the radio operator recognizes the distress signal and rushes out to summon the general in charge of the African operation. While Tarzan, Boy, and Jungle Priestess laughingly look on, Cheetah the chimp chatters into the microphone of the transmitter. Ignorant of the fatal struggle in the jungle depths, the general hears the chimp on the radio, jumps to his feet, salutes, and yells to his subordinates that they are listening not to Africa but to Der Führer. The roles of the sadistic, sex-crazed, bullet-headed, Nazi “Krauts”in these Jewish made anti-German movies were played by such Hollywood “heavies”as George Siegman, Erich von Stroheim, Walter Long and Hobart Bosworth. Actor Bobby Watson was kept busy throughout the war playing the part of Adolf Hitler. The American public, inundated with this kind of anti-German propaganda, was brainwashed to hate Germany and the German people. Anything our brave and noble armed forces could do to them was less than they deserved. Bomb their cities, kill their women and children. But destroy evil Germany by all means possible! British and American political leaders under Jewish influence The political leaders in both Britain and America were also under the controlling influence of the Jews. Both Roosevelt and Churchill had surrounded themselves with Jewish advisors, to the exclusion of almost anyone else, and relied on Jewish money to support their campaigns for office. Jews were 2% of the American population, but of the 15 members of Roosevelt’s “Brain Trust,”8 of them were Jews. The Jews therefore had control of the political leaders of both Britain and America, as well as control of public opinion in both countries. A partial list of Jews surrounding FDR included: Bernard Baruch, Felix Frankfurter, David E. Lilienthal, David Niles, Louis Brandeis, Samuel I. Rosenman, Henry Morgenthau, Jr., Benjamin V. Cohen, Rabbi Stephen Wise, Francis Perkins, Sidney Hillman, Herbert H. Lehman, Jesse I. Straus, Harold J. Laski, Charles E. Wyzanski, Samuel Untermyer, Edward Filene, David Dubinsky, Mordecai Ezekiel, Abe Fortus, Isador Lubin, Harry Dexter White (Weiss), David Weintraub, Nathan G. Silvermaster, Harold Glasser, Irving Kaplan, Solomon Adler, Benjamin Cardozo, Anna Rosenberg…and numerous, numerous others, almost to the exclusion of Gentile advisors. As a consequence, Roosevelt was enveloped in a milieu of Jewish hate and hostility for Germany, to the extent that he eventually became a part of it himself, habitually making malicious anti-Hitler and anti-Nazi remarks in public. These indiscreet public remarks by Roosevelt foreclosed any possibility of amicable diplomatic relations between Nazi Germany and the United States. Moreover, these Jews were, to a man, sympathetic to Stalin and the Communists and acted essentially as the Soviet Union’s agents within the American government. These Communist leaning Jews proliferated in every branch of Roosevelt’s government and spied routinely for the benefit of the Soviets. Roosevelt warmly regarded Joseph Stalin and referred to him as “Uncle Joe.”Churchill likewise surrounded himself with Jewish advisors. Churchill enjoyed living high on the hog though he had very little money. He was accused more than once during his long career of taking Jewish money in exchange for advocacy of policies which favored them. Churchill supplemented his salary as a public servant by writing as a journalist and by writing books, though these combined amounts were inadequate to finance his lavish life style. During his “wilderness years,”as he called them, between 1930 and 1939 when he was out of government, though still a Member of Parliament, Churchill was supported by a slush fund set up by a secret anti-German pressure group known as “The Focus.”Focus membership was composed of wealthy British Jews, like Sir Robert Mond, a directory of several chemical firms, and Sir Robert Waley-Cohen, the managing director of Shell Oil, who employed Churchill as their Gentile front man. The American Jew Bernard Baruch also made significant contributions to Churchill’s well being. Churchill’s assigned task was to fight Germany; to start warning the world about Nazi Germany. Churchill was a brilliant orator and a superb writer, and he did his job splendidly. Jewish money, primarily through “The Focus,”paid for Churchill’s lavish life style, got him into the British cabinet, and eventually made him Prime Minister. From his position as a Member of Parliament, and subsequently as a member of the cabinet, Churchill, doing the bidding of The Focus, began loudly and belligerently berating Nazi Germany and sternly criticized first Stanley Baldwin’s and then Neville Chamberlain’s alleged blindness to the threat to Britain posed by Nazi Germany. He began to clamor for war. Both Roosevelt and Churchill became Gentile front men in international Jewry’s war on Germany.

                  HOLOCOSTOMANIA – Subscribing to the politically correct view of the holocost without question or discussion – rots the brain, corrupts the morals and creates a psychopath. The only cure is the truth provided by those who oppose and contend against the wholesale force feeding and consequent perversion of the myth of the holocost. (Diane King)

                  Comment by Diane King — January 22, 2016 @ 1:37 pm

                • Holy crap that was a long comment.
                  However, this time I was able to see it because the notification came through my e-mail.
                  So, why did the West turn against Germany after the Munich Pact?
                  Because Germany violated the Munich Agreement.
                  Part of the Munich Agreement was that Germany guarantee the borders of what remained of Czechoslovakia. Germany refused to do so, encouraged separatist elements in Slovakia and even allowed Hungary and POLAND to grab pieces of Czechoslovakia.
                  In March of 1939 Hitler invaded, establishing the “Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia.” These were not German lands, never had been and were not populated by Germans.
                  Your author is not wrong….he’s just leaving out some important bits.
                  I agree that the British and French guarantee stiffened Polish resolve, making them unwilling to negotiate.
                  The rest of what your author is saying includes the typical, silly anti-Semitic bullshit that authors like this gentleman and authors like MS King espouse.
                  Yawn.
                  Heard it all before, still not impressed.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 6:18 pm

                • Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew
                  You might add Holohuckster.
                  You believe that Treblinka had a 120 ft high pile of clothes taken from diesel gassed jews.
                  After the Jews before them were steamed to death like lobsters. The story changes as the wind blows.
                  Anyone who could believe that has to have some issues.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 22, 2016 @ 6:25 pm

                • Like I said, Jim, adherence to the holocaust myth “…. without question or discussion – rots the brain, corrupts the morals and creates a potential psychopath. The only cure is the truth provided by those who oppose and contend against the wholesale force feeding and consequent perversion of the myth of the holocost. (Diane King)

                  Comment by Diane King — January 22, 2016 @ 6:28 pm

                • I have issues?????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?????????!!!!!!!!
                  Jim, I never took you for someone with a sense of humor but that was FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                  So, I’m supposed to think that you, mister conspiraloon himself, the man who believes savage Jews rule us from the shadows, doesn’t have ISSUES????!!!!!!!!!!????????!!!!!!
                  😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸
                  Oh, thank you, Jim. That was rich.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 6:34 pm

                • The concern is that the JEWS DO RUN US. You are only paranoid if it isn’t true: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76JMqrJxn8U and case in point with some brief humor. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=exYRApwSPGI

                  Comment by Diane King — January 22, 2016 @ 6:48 pm

                • Diane, if the Jews rule us, why would they continue to let you continue to speak?
                  Why would they allow this blog?
                  Why is it that I can go on-line right now and download all 30 or so Holocaust Handbooks….for free?
                  For that matter, why does CODOH still exist?
                  Or, Bible Believers?
                  If you ask me, the Jews are doing a pretty shitty job of ruling everything.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 7:14 pm

                • They are still subject to the bill of rights while they dissect and neutralize it. They’ll get around to this site and to people like me and Jim and others. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CROKfYmskvU Jim and Joe Rizoli discussing the systemic attacks on free speech, Illegal Immigration, Jewish control, the Hollowedco$t, and more. http://ccfiile.com/ Just a matter of time. We are on borrowed time.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 22, 2016 @ 7:25 pm

                • That’s what I mean. NOTHING we provide is acceptable to you. We continue to present. Regardless, though, just saw this and it was VERY impressive. https://youtu.be/7-2H3P1OesY

                  HOLOCOSTOMANIA – Subscribing to the politically correct view of the holocost without question or discussion – rots the brain, corrupts the morals and creates a potential psychopath. The only cure is the truth provided by those who oppose and contend against the wholesale force feeding and consequent perversion of the myth of the holocost. (Diane King)

                  Comment by Diane King — January 22, 2016 @ 6:26 pm

                • Diane, I simply pointed out the holes in what the author didn’t tell us.
                  Good grief, I simply can’t make you happy, can I?
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 6:38 pm

                • Hard to defend the Jews when they have been exposed for the lies…..
                  http://www.zengardner.com/6-million-lies/

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 22, 2016 @ 6:44 pm

                • What does that have to do with anything I just said?
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 7:01 pm

                • Good stuff in case you get bored….

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 22, 2016 @ 7:03 pm

                • I’ve already posted at least twice about the issue of Poland. Because you anti-German antagonists support that Hitler started the war through unprovoked invasion of poland, it’s in your best interest to maintain that position. After all, if it WAS provoked, that the Germans suffered under the poles, and Hitler had every right to go in to defend them, your whole narrative against Hitler falls apart as the great villain who started WWII. Here you go again:

                  “1939 The Polish Conflict: Problems had arisen in Poland over access to the German territory of East Prussia and the costal city of Danzig. Hitler on several occasions presented proposals to try and resolve both situations peaceably, but the Poles refused to seriously negotiate. Now in Poland, just as in Czechoslovakia, the safety of ethnic Germans was again becoming a concern for Hitler.

                  “Danzig: Until 1934, conflicts between Germany and Poland smouldered. Danzig, next to East Prussia, had been completely cut off from the Reich. Warsaw continued to try to wrest total control over the strategically important harbor city. In West Prussia, the situation was similar. East Prussia was now completely cut off from the German Reich. Bolstered by English and French guarantees of war support, Poland has no further incentive to negotiate in good faith with Germany. In the meantime, in Warsaw, maps are suddenly starting to circulate, which contain a new western Polish border, extending to just west of Berlin.

                  All across Poland, the so-called pogroms against the minorities begin. Night after night, Polish border officials shot at the fleeing Germans (their homes being burned). Shortly before the official outbreak of war, there were already 80,000 ethnic Germans in refugee camps in both Danzig and the German border area. The misery of the minority Germans in Poland had now developed the third and most pressing reason that would lead to the outbreak of war.”

                  Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 9:45 pm

                • JEFF. The German nationalists since last decades of century XIX wanted the conquest of Poland in order to settle German peasants there so avoiding their emigration to America. The Jews had been supposed to be expelled toward or Palestine – then Ottoman Empire – or toward Madagascar. So the invasion of Poland had been a key iusse of Nazi programm. The writings of Paul de Lagarde/ Paul Boettiker are in the Columbia University library.

                  Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 22, 2016 @ 9:11 am

    • Jeff wrote: “If Hitler wanted peace: Why the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact with the Soviet Union? Part of the pact was an agreement to split Poland between Germany and the USSR. If Hitler really wanted peace why would he agree to do this? Why not just an agreement for the USSR to remain neutral in case of war?”

      Why the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact? Because everybody could see the war coming and any German over 20 years old knew what a 2-front war meant. The Soviet Union has always remained the main threat to Germany in Hitler’s views. Hitler would have much preferred a military alliance with England, France, Poland and anybody else rather than non-aggression treaty with the Soviet Union. But England, France and Poland had patently embarked on the path to hostility toward Germany and it was clear none of those countries was to cooperate with Germany in a common defense for the inescapable (in Hitler’s views) coming war against the Soviet juggernaut. Hitler disliked the idea of a non-aggression treaty with the Bolshevik ogre, but he disliked even more the idea of a 2-front war which Germany could not emerge victorious, as the previous war had shown. All Hitler could do under such circumstances was neutralize the hostile nations in the west before the inescapable war in the east began, or in other words defeat his enemies one after the other rather than together (what was impossible). Basic strategy.

      Hitler even hoped to secure the cooperation of France and Britain for the coming war against the Soviet Union after showing them their own interests were in cooperation with Germany rather than in cooperation with a bellicose military junta no longer in existence and no longer at the head of Poland. He didn’t know that his attempt to suppress the Polish source of unrest and casus belli before it was too late, would be seized by Britain and France to start an intended war of obliteration against Germany at the expense of their own interests. He hoped that France and England would put the survival of their own empires and the life of their own citizens above their military agreement with a state they didn’t care about. Hitler had underestimated the Jewish grip over France and Britain, and he naively thought that France and England would protect their own interests (which were in peace with Germany) rather than go against those interests and fight a war very destructive to themselves for the interests of warmongering Jewry.

      Jeff wrote: “You brought up Hitler’s “offer.” Why rush? The normal way diplomacy works is both sides get together and compromise. This takes time.”

      Hitler’s peace offer of late August 1939 was no longer diplomacy. That was the last chance for peace. Diplomacy had patently failed and Hitler’s offer was about letting the inhabitant of the Korridor settle a matter diplomats were unable to settle.

      Jeff wrote: “What about Hitler’s plans to invade Poland on August 26th? Doesn’t sound peaceful to me. As I’ve stated repeatedly, German troops actually invaded Polish territory on the 26th when the halt order failed to get through to some of the border units.”

      Leaders wanting a war don’t do that (i.e. not taking the first opportunity for war and providing the other side with another way out). They act like England did: i.e. they just take the first opportunity for war, possibly with an offer of requirements they know unacceptable in order to preserve their deceitful mask of peace loving nation if needed (as hypocritical democracies usually do). From the 1st to the 3rd of September, Mussolini tried to organize an armistice and a peace conference. Hitler accepted it and England rejected it, claiming an armistice was not enough and Germany first had to withdraw from Poland. England’s leaders did that because they knew Hitler couldn’t accept such a thing. Can you imagine Hitler telling his soldiers and the relatives of his soldiers Fallen in the first days of the German-Polish war: “Sorry for your fallen friends and relatives, but their sacrifice was useless and you must come back home because a conference is going to be held.”? Ridiculous. Accepting an armistice was the best any responsible leader could do under such circumstances…and British leaders knew that. That’s why they torpedoed Mussolini’s peace conference with their ridiculous requirement, too afraid that damn Duce might succeed in cancelling their dear war.

      Jeff wrote: “This takes time. Hitler never truly “offered” the Poles anything”

      “The fact is that the only real offer of security which Poland received in 1938 and 1939 emanated from Hitler. He offered to guarantee the boundaries laid down in the Versailles Treaty against every other country. Even the Weimar Republic had not for a moment taken this into consideration. Whatever one may think of Hitler’s government or foreign policy, no doubt exists on this point; his proposals to Poland in 1938/39 were reasonable and just and the most moderate of all which he made during the six years of his efforts to revise the Versailles Treaty by peaceful means.” – Professor Harry Elmer Barnes, American Historian

      “The state of German armament in 1939 gives the decisive proof that Hitler was not contemplating general war, and probably not intending war at all” – Prof AJP Taylor, The Origins of the Second World War, p. 267

      “Even in 1939 the German army was not equipped for a prolonged war; and in 1940 the German land forces were inferior to the French in everything except leadership.” – Prof AJP Taylor, The Origins of the Second World War, p. 104-5

      Comment by hermie — January 21, 2016 @ 9:46 pm

      • So, if the West wanted war all along, why fight over Poland?
        Poland had wide open frontiers with two powerful countries on either side….both of which had reasons to want Polish independence to end.
        I’ll remind you that Poland fought a war with the Soviet Union 1920-21, winning and grabbing Soviet territory. Of course I don’t need to remind you about the Corridor and Danzig.
        If the West wanted a fight, why not over Czechoslovakia? Czechoslovakia had a modern army, not to mention an excellent defensive position.
        If the goal was to get into a war, why bother to appease Hitler at all? The French had a treaty with Czechs.
        So, the French with their great army, sat on their asses for nine months, letting the Germans conquer Poland and consolidate their position. The French did attempt a half-assed invasion of Germany but pulled back without hardly firing a shot. I agree that the West had better equipment….which they didn’t bother to use.
        The French and British lacked the will to fight, Hermie. This included their highest leadership. The West never wanted war and fell over themselves to give Hitler whatever he wanted throughout the 30’s. Had Hitler left the rest of Czechoslovakia alone after absorbing the Sudetenland the West would have never stirred. Instead, Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia before the ink was barely dry on the Munich Pact, making Chamberlain realize that Hitler could never be trusted. Remember, Hitler stated that the Sudetenland was the last territory he would claim.
        To be fair, I think it surprised Hitler that the West did declare war on him. German claims to Polish territory were certainly stronger than the Sudetenland, which, though populated with Germans was never part of Germany. It belonged to the Austro-Hungarian Empire.
        I genuinely believe that Hitler, the Austrian, was perfectly content to continue with friendly relations towards Poland….as long as they gave him what he wanted.
        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 10:31 am

        • Jeff wrote: “So, if the West wanted war all along, why fight over Poland? If the West wanted a fight, why not over Czechoslovakia?”

          In short, because the right moment had not yet arrived in mid-March 1939.

          In long,

          1) Because England had no military agreement with Poland yet. The Anglo-Polish military agreement came on March 31, 1939, i.e. 2 weeks after German troops entered Bohemia and Moravia.

          2) Because additional armament was still needed, especially on the British side.

          3) Because there was no point for another world war at that time in a Zionist perspective. In the days of the Czechoslovak crisis and the Munich agreement, the Zionist leaders were still discussing with England over the future of Palestine. The St James Palace conference failed in mid-March 1939 and a Zionist agent threw England in the bed of the military junta heading the Polish state only two weeks later. On March 29, 1939, Ian Colvin, the Berlin correspondent of the News Chronicle (a newspaper of the Focus Group’s network, an anti-Nazi organization led by Zionist leader Sir Robert Waley Cohen), stormed into the office of British PM Neville Chamberlain and told him that a German invasion was imminent, maybe within the following 12 hours. The British government, unable to check Colvin’s assertion, fell for that trick and quickly pledged England to war. On March 31, 1939, Chamberlain voiced Britain’s military commitment with Poland’s Colonels Regime.

          4) Because strong pressure on Britain came from the White House after March 15, 1939 (when German troops entered Czech lands). War monger Franklin Roosevelt ‘advised’ (injuncted) England to stop being conciliatory with Germany any longer. On 16 March 1939 Roosevelt “sent a virtual ultimatum to Chamberlain” demanding that henceforth the British government strongly oppose Germany and “the president warned that Britain could expect no more support, moral or material through the sale of airplanes, if the Munich policy continued.” Chamberlain gave in and the next day, 17 March, ended Britain’s policy of cooperation (the so-called ‘policy of appeasement’) with Germany in a speech at Birmingham bitterly denouncing Hitler. In that speech, Chamberlain asked: “Is this the end of an old adventure, or is it the beginning of a new? […] Is this, in fact, a step in the direction of an attempt to dominate the world by force?” William C. Bullitt, the leading American diplomat in Europe, was pleased by the reversal of British policy and sent a jubilant report from Paris on March 17, 1939, in which he triumphantly concluded that there was no longer any possibility for a peaceful diplomatic settlement of European differences. On 25 April 1939, 4 months before the outbreak of WW2, Bullitt called American newspaper columnist Karl von Wiegand, chief European correspondent of the International News Service, to the U.S. embassy in Paris and told him: “War in Europe has been decided upon. Poland has the assurance of the support of Britain and France, and will yield to no demands from Germany. America will be in the war soon after Britain and France enter it.”

          Jeff wrote: “The French had a treaty with Czechs.So, the French with their great army, sat on their asses for nine months, letting the Germans conquer Poland and consolidate their position.”

          Because the French republic was the soft belly of the Zionist-US conspiracy for another world war. WW1 had taken place on French soil (in constrast to England and the United States) and only 2 decades had elapsed since the previous armistice. Most French people were far from willing to go through such a butchery again. For them, a world war was more than an exciting adventure in distant lands as for an American or British citizen. That was a butchery amid their homes and families. Surely good food for thought.

          Jeff wrote: “Hitler invaded Czechoslovakia before the ink was barely dry on the Munich Pact, making Chamberlain realize that Hitler could never be trusted.”

          Nice regurgitation of the victors’ childish and moronic narrative.

          Czech president Emile Hacha freely signed an agreement for the establishment of a protectorate with Hitler. An understandable choice after seeing the dislocation of the artificial state of Czechoslovakia. Hacha wanted to save what could still be saved of Czech lands. And the establishment of a German protectorate over Bohemia and Moravia was his best option to achieve that. Unsuprisingly, the victors of WW2 claim Hacha was coerced in doing that. But their claim is quite baseless and contradicted by what Hacha’s daughter said after the war. The latter said after the war that her father was treated courteously and kindly by the Germans, and with all the attention and consideration normally given to a statesman.

          Comment by hermie — January 24, 2016 @ 10:10 am

          • It’s amazing how prescient these alleged zionists were, how prescient the Western leaders were.
            So, as I said before, these people led Hitler around by the nose, making sure he behaved like a dupe and gave them everything they wanted.
            So basically this whole conspiracy relied upon them fooling Hitler into each misstep until this grand conspiracy came to a grand conclusion………..with France defeated, Britain driven from Europe and Poland defeated and divided in two. Not to mention most of Europe in control of or allied to Germany.
            Sounds like a major fuck up if you ask me.

            What a fascinating way of looking at history backwards. Tell me, Hermie, what kind of cookies do you get with the crazy Kool Aid you drink?
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 11:55 am

            • Jeff wrote: “It’s amazing how prescient these alleged zionists were, how prescient the Western leaders were.”

              Prescience is just the Zio-Masonic code word for “We’ve made every step of our long-term plan happen as we had announced.”

              The actions of all those ‘prescient’ Zionists and Masons should rather be called insider warmongering. Their ‘prescience’ is the political equivalent of insider trading in economics.

              Jeff wrote: “So basically this whole conspiracy relied upon them fooling Hitler into each misstep until this grand conspiracy came to a grand conclusion”

              I’d rather say it relied upon labelling Hitler’s actions as missteps when necessary. There existed peaceful ways out, but peace was of no help for the progress of the Zio-Masonic NWO agenda. Two sides are needed for peace, while only one side is enough for war.

              After WW1, Winston Churchill candidly admitted that, in a British perspective, WW1 had been nothing but a convenient way to restore a European “balance of power” beneficial to Britain and its trade, so destroying England’s Belgian excuse. In a general perspective, it was vastly demonstrated during the interwar period that WW1 had been the result of a Russian imperialist plot (to extend Russian influence in the Balkans at the expense of the weakened Austro-Hungarian Empire, by using Pan-Slavism as a destabilizing factor in that area) and a French revenge plot (to get the lost provinces of Alsace and Lorraine back), with Zionists and their stooges maneuvring behind the scenes and using others’ interests to achieve their own agenda.

              “It may be that Turkey will refuse or be unable to understand us. This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our end. […] The great European War must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible moment. After the great European war is ended the Peace Conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time. We will assuredly be called to this great conference of the nations and we must prove to them the urgent importance of a Zionist solution to the Jewish Question.” – Zionist leader Theodore Herzl, 1897, 1st World Zionist Congress, to delegate Litman Rosenthal.

              “Let me tell you the following words as if I were showing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: Herzl, the Zionist Congress, the English Uganda proposition, the future world war, the peace conference – where with the help of England a free and Jewish Palestine will be created” – Zionist leader Max Nordau, 1903, 6th World Zionist Congress.

              “We told the responsible authorities: We will establish ourselves in Palestine whether you like it or not. You can hasten our arrival or you can equally retard it. It is however better for you to help us so as to avoid our constructive powers being turned into a destructive power which will overthrow the world.” – Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann, December 1919, speech in Jerusalem.

              But WW2 was different. This time, ‘they’ probably told us the truth, didn’t they?!?

              You’re right, Jeff. Don’t let doubt disturb your sleep. Don’t allow anybody to ruin your great story – no matter how ridiculous and nonsensical – with the truth…😉

              Comment by hermie — January 25, 2016 @ 6:35 am

              • Edit: [2nd] pic posted above but not showing in my comment (for unknown reason)…

                Comment by hermie — January 25, 2016 @ 6:41 am

                • It’s the Jews, Hermie.
                  They wanted a Goebbels quote instead.

                  Comment by Jeff — January 25, 2016 @ 5:06 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “It’s the Jews, Hermie.”

                  I knew it!!!😉

                  Jeff wrote: “They wanted a Goebbels quote instead.”

                  I know that. The Gentile conception of good propaganda makes them – the successful masters of bamboozlement – laugh a lot…

                  Comment by hermie — January 26, 2016 @ 4:49 am

              • So then, what you are saying is that these Zionists skillfully duped Hitler into war.
                What a dumb ass.
                I honestly don’t understand what you, Diane and Jim see in the man.
                Seriously though, Hermie, what you want me to believe is that these warmongers and Jews skillfully arranged events so that everything would fall into the right place at the right time.
                To create a Jewish homeland.
                They were miserably out of step, then. Why, if war was the goal, was the West so horribly unprepared to wage war?
                Don’t give me this crap about public opinion. If the whole idea was war from the beginning then in this weird alternate universe you inhabit the moment Germany stepped over the Polish border the Poles, well equipped by the West, should have stopped the German army in its tracks. In the meantime the French, backed by a powerful BEF, would launch a devastating attack into the Ruhr. Within a year it would have been over.
                Instead, the Germans trampled over the Poles with their obsolete tanks and fighters while the French sat with their thumbs up their asses. It took the British two months to build their army up to 100,000 men after the Germans invaded Poland. Instead of bombing the Ruhr, which Hitler secretly dreaded, the British dropped……propaganda pamphlets.
                The allies were divided over goals and objectives, with the French refusing to allow the British to mine German rivers while advocating, get this, bombing Soviet oilfields.
                So, if all you say is true, this was the worst run conspiracy in the history of the world. By June of 1940 the Germans conquered France and drove the British across the English Channel.
                Is this part of a regular comedy routine, Hermie?
                It’s hysterical.
                Jeff
                PS-What, no Goebbels quotes?

                Comment by Jeff — January 25, 2016 @ 5:03 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “So then, what you are saying is that these Zionists skillfully duped Hitler into war. What a dumb ass.”

                  They skillfully duped everybody into war. Apart from their own agents and collaborators, nobody in Europe wanted another world war. Some British and Polish leaders wanted a short war against Germany. Some men of the Polish Colonels’ Regime believed that Germany would be defeated very quickly with the British and French armies on their side. Some British leaders were in contact with the anti-Hitler opposition in Germany and they had been assured that a popular revolution would soon have overthrown Hitler and his regime in the event of another world war, so enabling England to get rid of the Hitler regime at minimum costs. The following events demonstrated how wrong they were and England was finally compelled to burn down its own world empire to win that very long & destructive war.

                  Jeff wrote: “Seriously though, Hermie, what you want me to believe is that these warmongers and Jews skillfully arranged events so that everything would fall into the right place at the right time.”

                  No, I don’t. That’s a gross distortion of my previous comment.

                  Applying the principle that “if a man wants to drown his dog, he accuses it of having rabies (of being mad),” it’s not so hard to drag others into a quarrel or a war. Peace is a challenge. War is not. From the time war had been decided, depicting any of Hitler’s actions as a misstep and threat to Britain and the world in general was a breeze. Jewry owned more than enough media in those days to depict Hitler as a mad dog to be drowned and agitate for war effectively.

                  Jeff wrote: “Why, if war was the goal, was the West so horribly unprepared to wage war?”

                  Repeating ad nauseam that the West was unprepared to wage war, won’t make it true. On paper, England and France greatly surpassed Germany militarily speaking. But the armies of England and even more of France were poorly led (by old generals using strategies of the 19th century) while the German armies were masterfully led. But that was no problem in a general perspective anyway. When you have so many powerful countries and limitless resources at your disposal, you can afford such blunders and prevail at the end anyway, as the following events showed. All what warmongers needed was light the match and wait for the American and Soviet entry into the war and for the subsequent predictable victory. Roosevelt had openly proclaimed his policy of “rejected coexistence” with the fascist states of Europe on enough occasions, and he was well enough in Jewry’s bed, to be tranquil and confident about the final defeat of Nazi Germany, even years before the US formally entered WW2.


                  September 12, 1939

                  Jeff wrote: “the British dropped……propaganda pamphlets.”

                  Propaganda pamphlets advising the German population to riot and overthrow Hitler and his regime, I guess.

                  Hitler dropped propaganda pamphlets too. In summer 1940 for instance, British propagandists had a hard time trying to explain Hitler’s “rain of peace leaflets” on British soil…

                  Jeff wrote: “So, if all you say is true, this was the worst run conspiracy in the history of the world.”

                  Distortions are magic, aren’t they?😉

                  If all I say is untrue, why did Roosevelt, when told by his spies about the secret protocol of the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact, didn’t warn Poland’s leaders about a possible imminent two-front invasion of their lands if negotiations with Germany didn’t resume very soon? FDR couldn’t fail to realize that conveying such an information to Poland’s leaders would have certainly brought a peaceful way out of the acute German-Polish crisis.

                  Comment by hermie — January 26, 2016 @ 4:11 am

      • Hemie – ‘They act like England did: i.e. they just take the first opportunity for war, possibly with an offer of requirements they know unacceptable in order to preserve their deceitful mask of peace loving nation if needed’

        I wrote in an earlier comment about some of the reasons why Britain went to wareventually, and their previous policy of ‘appeasement’..

        Hitler remilitarised the Rhineland, annexed Austria and the Sudetenland, followed by the full invasion of Czechoslovakia after the Munich agreement. Then he invaded Poland. Britain and France finally declared war on Germany. Hitler may not have wanted war with Britain, but he got it due to his own actions. Then, Hitler, the gifted military leader, invaded Russian and was stupid enough to declare war on America too.

        Comment by srebrenica — January 23, 2016 @ 3:25 pm

        • You said, ” … Hitler remilitarised the Rhineland, annexed Austria and the Sudetenland, followed by the full invasion of Czechoslovakia after the Munich agreement. Then he invaded Poland. Britain and France finally declared war on Germany. Hitler may not have wanted war with Britain, but he got it due to his own actions. Then, Hitler, the gifted military leader, invaded Russian and was stupid enough to declare war on America too.”

          It is tiring when you inflicted with holocostomania trot out the same old tired politically correct crap.

          1) Smart move to ‘remilitarize’ the Rhineland.
          2) Blumenkrieg – war of flowers because Austria WANTED the annexation since Germany had been doing so well. The vote was in the 90 percentile in favor of it.
          3) Czech – rescuing the ethnic Germans there as well as ….
          4) Poland – rescued the tortured ethnic Germans there as well.
          5) His actions? …. like numerous overtures to England for peace which they rejected. Hitler didn’t want to go to war especially not with England. As I’ve stated elsewhere, he had to do something concerning the persecuted Germans in Poland.
          6) Pre-emptive strike against Russia as they were marshalling forces for an invasion:

          “According to the conventional view, Hitler’s perfidious attack abruptly forced a neutral and aloof Soviet Russia into war. This view further holds that a surprised Stalin had naively trusted the deceitful German Führer. Rejecting this view as political propaganda, Suvorov shows Stalin’s personal responsibility for the war’s outbreak and progression. Above all, this book details the vast Soviet preparations for an invasion of Europe in the summer of 1941 with the goal of Sovietizing central and western Europe. Suvorov is not alone in his view. It is also affirmed by a number of non-Russian historians, such as American scholar R. H. S. Stolfi in his 1991 study Hitler’s Panzers East: World War II Reinterpreted (reviewed by me in the Nov.-Dec. 1995 Journal).” http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v16/v16n6p22_Bishop.html

          7) Declared war against the U.S. because of his alliance with Japan. FDR KNEW Hitler would do this and he wanted the U.S., the people of whom were 99% against involvement in another European war, to be willing to throw their kids at yet another useless war, so with a convenient and 7-month oil embargo against Japan, strangling Japan’s economy (also at the behest of England for their English interests in the Pacific), Japan had to strike – to accomplish other ends, which worked. The day of infamy about which Roosevelt speaks is of HIS OWN making.

          “Pearl Harbor is an example of how a small group of men in control of government has the power to destroy the life, property, and freedom of its citizens. How can this nation, or any nation, survive when its electorate is uninformed, that government hides the truth, labels it top secret, and destroys it.” Roger A. Stolley http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p119_Stolley.html

          Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 4:49 pm

          • Diane, have you honestly ever picked up a history book in your entire life?
            Rescuing the tortured Germans in Czechoslovakia and Poland?
            Aaaaaawwwwww, how sweet.
            The Sudetenland enjoyed a great deal of autonomy from the Czech Republic. The Czechs avoided issues with their German minority for obvious reasons. The Czechs treated their Germans far better than the Poles did (not that this stopped Hitler from signing a treaty with the Poles and having a very good relationship with them until the Spring of 1939). Certainly the Czechs treated their minorities better than minorities in this country during the 30’s.
            I’ve already talked about German-Polish relations. See the link I posted earlier.
            The Japanese-German Treaty was purely defensive. The Germans were under no obligation to declare war on the US, it was the height of foolishness to do so. True, there was an undeclared war going on in the Atlantic during the Summer of 1941 between the US and German Navies but the attack on Pearl Harbor forced the withdrawal of US Naval forces to the Pacific to meet that threat. Roosevelt did not have the votes to declare war on Germany and there was disagreement within the US military on the “Germany First” policy. All Hitler needed to do was not rise to the bait…..which he was unable to do.
            The Soviet military was a mess in 1941. Stalin purged all of his competent officers and generals in 1937-1938. What were left were party hacks. There existed some competent officers, Zhukov and Konev are examples of this, but for the most part the Red Army was poorly led and poorly equipped. The Red Army did possess some of excellent weapons systems, the T-34 tank the most important, but even then the T-34 lacked radios and had inexperienced drivers.
            Zhukov did urge a preemptive attack in May of 1941 but Stalin shot it down. Stalin understood there was no way the Red Army was ready for that type of operation. In a way, an attack by the Red Army in 1941 would have been a blessing for the Germans. It is likely that it would have resulted in a catastrophic defeat by the Red Army and would have focused a German counterattack towards Moscow. Instead, Barbarossa was a logistical nightmare and was all over the place, lacking a single powerful thrust.
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 23, 2016 @ 5:22 pm

            • Pick up a history book? Again you are being insulting and condescending. Also ignorant with what I’ve said before. But then I could say the same thing to you and by the way, the sun doesn’t rise and set on you or your knowledge. To know THE WRONG thing 100% is no mark of intelligence of understanding just dutiful and purposeful ignorance. Some of us can be ignorant by accident but when we learn the truth or ‘the right way’ we are no longer ignorant. Some can refuse to see the truth and ignore it. I think that’s what YOU are doing. I’ve been where you are. 16 years ago I learned the truth and it hasn’t changed.

              Comment by Diane King — January 23, 2016 @ 7:39 pm

              • I don’t think Jeff is being insulting and condescending – it’s obvious you have never read a proper history book about the origins of World War 2 from your comment above. Jeff has already responded to the drivel you wrote above, so I won’t bother to repeat the facts he wrote about.

                You clearly don’t understand the impact that World War 1 had on the French and British nations, and their desire to avoid another war in Europe at almost any cost. This led to the policy of disarmament and appeasement. WW1 had an impact on Germany because of the reparations they were forced to pay to the Allies, leading to instability and massive inflation, which directly led to the rise of Hitler and the Nazi’s. There was a view in Germany after WW1 that the Germans could have won that war because of their initial successes in Spring 1918 with Stormtrooper tactics, but they were ‘stabbed in the back’ by the civilian population and the November Criminals. The reality was that the Germans were broken, and after the final offensive on the Hindenburg Line, in September 1918, they moved to surrender before being pushed back into Germany itself. The ‘stab in the back’ story was adopted by the Nazi’s in the 30’s and was a major reason why the Allies demanded unconditional surrender by the German state in Workd War 2:

                “‘It was necessary for the Nazi régime and/or the German Generals to surrender unconditionally in order to bring home to the German people that they had lost the War of themselves; so that their defeat should not be attributed to a “stab in the back'” (John Wheeler-Bennett)

                Comment by srebrenica — January 24, 2016 @ 11:12 am

                • Now you both are insulting, condescending AND presumptuous just because my explanations don’t suit you, you believe you KNOW about my academic history – must be like those psychic powers attributed to the Germans for communicating extermination thoughts that were NEVER identified in official documents because ‘… oh well, we KNOW what they meant…’ So you are assuming you know about my background. Adds to your willful ignorance.

                  You quoted: ““‘It was necessary for the Nazi régime and/or the German Generals to surrender unconditionally in order to bring home to the German people that they had lost the War of themselves; so that their defeat should not be attributed to a “stab in the back’” (John Wheeler-Bennett)”

                  This is absurd. The Germans didn’t START WWI – what nonsense! And maybe the French and British wished to avoid war but their masters did not. They had the agenda with total annihilation of Germany, reduction of both French and British empires (such as they were) and using both against Germany also to orchestrate bringing the U.S. into the war. The Soviet Union was already bent on world domination – so their masters’ and their wishes were the same.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 1:12 pm

                • Diane it’s great to see a woman able to disable these uninformed wannabe historians.
                  You go girl!

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 24, 2016 @ 1:15 pm

                • Thank yoiu, Jim. It’s a pleasure and one more thing. I was going to post this after listening to it – regarding Elie Wiesel (and Google significantly translates it into ‘weasel’, which is very apropos) relating to this con artist as well as add to the fantasy horror stories regarding the holocaust. Bradley Smith was in true form.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 4:09 pm

                • Oh no!!!!!
                  Not Eli Wiesel!!!!!!!!
                  Yawn.
                  I actually don’t believe the old fraud. The only sad part is that if he is a fraud then he is disrespecting all of the other genuine Holicaust Survivors. That is a tragedy.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 5:23 pm

                • I don’t think you are stupid, Diane. I think your problem is you believe authors like MS King and Benton Bradberry are actually reliable sources.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 2:36 pm

                • Jeff…… Diane’s sources a better than your Holocosthucksters who been lieing for the last 75 years.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 24, 2016 @ 3:12 pm

                • No, Jim, they are not.
                  To be fair, I have not read the Myth of German Villainy but if it’s anything like “The Bad War” I don’t feel like I need to.
                  I have read extensively about the history of Europe. I believe my sources are much better.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 3:47 pm

                • Diane’s sources are hacks.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 4:08 pm

        • Srebrenica wrote: “Hitler may not have wanted war with Britain, but he got it due to his own actions.”

          Excuse are made to be used, aren’t they? One will never see any sanctimonious & hypocritical democratic leader open admit that he just wants:wanted war. A convenient and vilified scapegoat must always be found…

          Srebrenica wrote: “Then, Hitler, the gifted military leader, invaded Russian and was stupid enough to declare war on America too.”

          There was no way to keep the USA and the USSR out of the war any longer. Hitler’s preemptive strike against the Soviet Union (about to attack Germany in summer 1941) and formalization of the existing state of war with the United States (FDR had been capturing and sinking German ships for months when Hitler finally decided to respond FDR’s bellicose actions) couldn’t be avoided. The orthodox narrative makes no sense at all. That’s the reason why you and the other orthodox storytellers are compelled to ‘explain’ it by Hitler’s alleged madness. But the orthodox narrative is nonsensical because it is a mere pack of absurd lies, not because of an alleged erratic & irrational behavior on Hitler’s part as claimed.

          Comment by hermie — January 24, 2016 @ 10:32 am

          • I didn’t say Hitler was mad – I said he was stupid. You make some valid points btw – war was probably inevitable between Russia and Germany at some point between 1941 and 44, It’s also true that the US had been supporting the UK with materials and money and aiding the North Atlantic convoys. But Hitler need not have declared war on America too as Jeff pointed out. IMHO that was stupid.

            Comment by srebrenica — January 24, 2016 @ 11:29 am

            • I’ve always objected when people call Hitler mad. I think you have to put him in his proper historical context. Like Stalin, Hitler had goals he wanted to accomplish and he was indifferent to the human cost, believing the ends would justify the means. I think only when his world was collapsing around him did Hitler become unhinged and unrealistic.
              I think his health problems contributed to this, along with some of the drugs Morrell was giving him.
              Jeff

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 12:47 pm

            • Srebrenica wrote: “I didn’t say Hitler was mad – I said he was stupid. ”

              Almost less ridiculous.

              What number of brain cells did anybody need to realize that the USSR and the USA were titanic military juggernauts with limitless natural, human and industrial resources available?

              Srebrenica wrote: “Hitler need not have declared war on America too ”

              Yes, Hitler could have used all kinds of provocations & attacks similar to FDR’s ones and fired on the US warships trying to sink his own ships, without any formal declaration of war. But it seems that only democratic leaders are able of such a level of hypocrisy and mass deception.

              Comment by hermie — January 25, 2016 @ 7:58 am

          • The Soviets were in no condition to wage an offensive war in the Summer of 1941. Zhukov wanted to launch a preemptive strike on Germany but Stalin shot the idea down.
            In a way, a Soviet strike, or attempted strike, against Germany in the Summer of 1941 would have been the best thing for Germany. A poorly led, poorly executed strike by the Red Army at Germany would have focused a German counterattack instead of spreading 3 million men all over the map.
            As for the US, absolutely, FDR wanted war. However, the Japanese strike at Pearl Harbor guaranteed (as I’ve said repeatedly) a withdrawal of the US fleet from the Atlantic to the Pacific to meet the Japanese threat. FDR did not have the votes to get a Declaration of War (I understand you don’t understand this Hermie. Brief summary:
            In the US political system the president cannot arbitrarily declare war. It requires an Act of Congress. As a European I know that sounds strange.). All Hitler needed to do was keep his nerve and let the US Fleet move off to the Pacific. The German-Japanese Treaty was defensive only.
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 12:23 pm

            • Jeff wrote: “The Soviets were in no condition to wage an offensive war in the Summer of 1941.”

              If Bolshevik propagandists said so, that must be true.

              The idea of the Soviet ‘Man of Steel’ (the word ‘stalin’ means ‘steel’ in Russia) even planning to remain out of a war of epic proportions patently about to change the face of the world, is a laughable nonsense in itself.

              Jeff wrote: “Hitler needed to do was keep his nerve and let the US Fleet move off to the Pacific.”

              What would have never happened…as Roosevelt’s “Europe first” policy later showed.

              Jeff wrote: “The German-Japanese Treaty was defensive only.”

              Hitler knew that. The Japanese nonintervention in the German-Soviet war from June to December 1941 had exposed that in broad daylight. Hitler didn’t formalize the existing state of war between Germany and America in December 1941 because of the German-Japanese Treaty as claimed on and on by academic storytellers. That’s just laughable bogus history.

              Comment by hermie — January 25, 2016 @ 8:12 am

              • Hitler knew that. The Japanese nonintervention in the German-Soviet war from June to December 1941 had exposed that in broad daylight. Hitler didn’t formalize the existing state of war between Germany and America in December 1941 because of the German-Japanese Treaty as claimed on and on by academic storytellers. That’s just laughable bogus history.
                Really? Diane believes that the Germans went to war because of treaty obligations. She got that from Benton Bradberry and MS King, both are Holocaust deniers.
                Naturally what you say confirms my point, Hitler was a dumbass.
                As far as the Germany First Plan, it’s kinda hard to put that in place of you are not at war with Germany. Hitler’s refusal to declare war would have put the US in a fine pickle.
                As for Stalin, nothing you said repudiates what I said. You simply made you standard ridiculous statement that makes you look foolish.
                Jeff K.

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 25, 2016 @ 5:46 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “both are Holocaust deniers.”

                  Quite telling about your own poor thinking & analysis abilities and laughable evidential standards. One only has to tell a story you like, to be believed by you. What a moron you are!!!

                  Comment by hermie — January 26, 2016 @ 4:56 am

                • Why am I a moron, Hermie?
                  I simply pointed out that Diane, and two of her authors, wrongly interpreted that Germany was obligated to go to war with the US. I also pointed out that they think like you-you know, like a loon.
                  Anyway, since you understand that Hitler was under no obligation to the Japanese, other than a defensive one, that Hitler was actually the moron.
                  I’m glad we both agree that Hitler was a moron for declaring war on the US.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff — January 26, 2016 @ 5:33 am

                • Again in your statement of why Hitler declared war on the U.S., you are inferring your version of a bad motive (something you couldn’t possibly know). Because that seems to be the CONSTANT mantra of the politically correct, I will ALWAYS take the adversarial position.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 26, 2016 @ 1:39 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “Why am I a moron, Hermie?”

                  Probably because your gene pool is of poor quality. I don’t know.😉

                  Jeff wrote: “I’m glad we both agree that Hitler was a moron for declaring war on the US.”

                  Another one of your so numerous imaginary victories and fraudulent extrapolations, I’m afraid.

                  Hitler didn’t declare war on the US. FDR did declare war on Germany. Or is the sinking of foreign ships a declaration of war, a ‘day of infamy’, only when the latter are anchored at Pearl Harbor? C’mon. Stop making a fool of yourself…

                  And numerous captured Nazi leaders – with IQs from around 120 to around 140 – depicted Hitler’s impressive intellect in very laudatory terms during their interrogations. People with such IQs are not impressed by morons’ IQs (and I’m at the right place to know that). That’s nonsensical.

                  Comment by hermie — January 30, 2016 @ 7:36 am

                • Hitler didn’t declare war on the US. FDR did declare war on Germany. Or is the sinking of foreign ships a declaration of war, a ‘day of infamy’, only when the latter are anchored at Pearl Harbor? C’mon. Stop making a fool of yourself…
                  I’ve said, repeatedly, over and over again, that there was an undeclared naval war going on between the US and Germany in the Summer of 1941. Doenitz repeatedly asked Hitler to give him permission to attack US ships and Hitler refused. Hitler only allowed German ships to defend themselves from attack. That is what happened, US ships fired on German U-Boats, who then fired back. Hitler actually showed a great deal of restraint (I’ve also said this before) by not going to unrestricted submarine attacks on US vessels. Hitler wanted to keep the US out of the war as long as possible.

                  This is what makes Hitler’s actions after Pearl Harbor incomprehensible. Why on earth would Hitler declare war at that moment after showing so much restraint until then? His treaty with the Japanese did not require a joint declaration of war. For Hitler things could only improve with the US removing their naval forces from the Atlantic to the Pacific. As I’ve said repeatedly, Roosevelt did not have the necessary votes to declare war on Germany, at that moment the Japanese looked like the bigger threat.
                  The decision looks even more insane when you look at the military situation. At the same time Hitler declared war the Red Army was driving German armies back from Moscow, ending the German threat on Moscow.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — February 3, 2016 @ 10:36 am

                • And numerous captured Nazi leaders – with IQs from around 120 to around 140 – depicted Hitler’s impressive intellect in very laudatory terms during their interrogations. People with such IQs are not impressed by morons’ IQs (and I’m at the right place to know that). That’s nonsensical.

                  I’ve always believed Hitler to be a smart man, Hermie.
                  But, according to you, the British and French, backed by shadowy Zionists, tricked Hitler into WW II.
                  Then, at the worst possible time, Roosevelt goaded Hitler into declaring war.
                  Now, I’ve never doubted Hitler’s basic intelligence. He sized up people very well. According to everything I’ve ever read about him he was well read and actually very courteous, if a bit remote. His problem was that sometimes he let his emotions overrule his better judgement. I also believe that to a certain extent he was driven by the need to accomplish his goals as fast as possible, driven by his own feelings of mortality, exacerbated by his fear of dying at a young age.
                  I think this contributed to his mistakes that led to Germany’s defeat.
                  So, I actually think my interpretation works in Hitler’s favor. I think Hitler was a very intelligent but flawed individual. I honestly think it surprised him when the British and French declared war on him. While attacking the Soviet Union was a terrible mistake I think Hitler’s reasons for doing it made some sense, the problem was doing it with Britain still in the fight. I still don’t understand the rationale of declaring war on the US. Hitler refused to escalate the war in the Atlantic in spite of Doenitz urging him to do so. If Hitler had allowed the US to withdraw from the Atlantic without declaring war this would have put Churchill and Roosevelt in a severe bind because public opinion in the US saw the Japanese as the bigger threat, not the Germans.
                  So, no, Hermie, I do not and never have looked at Hitler as a “moron.” I think your weird conspiracy theory take actually makes Hitler look worse. It shows him as a man unable to see that some shadowy cabal was leading him into disaster, that he allowed Roosevelt to trick him into a declaration of war, that he never saw it coming.
                  I actually think that makes Hitler look worse.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — February 3, 2016 @ 1:18 pm

  17. Wow, we are really filling up the replies on this one.
    Jeff the Chinese-Irish Jew

    Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 6:38 am

    • lol, I think the two knuckle heads have set a record🙂

      Comment by srebrenica — January 21, 2016 @ 12:16 pm

      • Yep, this is fun.
        Though, I’m having a hard time getting work done. I’m working on Mid-Year Reviews for my employees and I hate personnel stuff.
        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 12:28 pm

  18. Wow, 158 replies on one topic.
    Srebrenica, this has been fun.
    I’m going to duck out now, I’ve got to put the kids to bed and eat some dinner. I’ll check back in tomorrow.
    Jim and Diane, have a nice evening.
    Jeff the Chinese-Irish Jew

    Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 6:14 pm

  19. FG said: “Germany is now trying to make amends for murdering 6 million Jews during World War II, but they will soon be running out of old men to bring into court on a stretcher and charge with “being an accessory.'” Well, they have rounded up women who challenge them like Ursula Haverbeck who denied the holocost on German public TV and has been sentenced to 1 year in prison. And then in the true spirit of the ‘survivor mentality of the great myth’, they can start coming after the children to the third and fourth generation. I saw a film of jews going through auschwitz and they wanted to kill the children of Germans – very Soviet of them too.

    Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 3:50 pm

  20. Now we have two knuckleheads that we have to deal with that I have no clue what’s going on with the topic.

    Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 3:48 pm

    • Unfortunately, for now, there are more of them than there of us. But then we don’t need a majority to be right!

      Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 3:53 pm

      • No you just need to present some facts, which are conspicuously absent. We actually have some idea, us knuckleheads with what’s going on with the topic because we raised it – I think we are still waiting for you to refute the evidence with some facts rather than some anti-semitic nonsense – as I said yesterday – balls in your court Jim

        Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 4:06 pm

        • Extensive, thorough and all-inclusive facts are presented – your ilk’s typical response is ignore it and then demand facts. You have enough facts presented in forums like that. Like Jeff said, pick up a book on the topic once in a while – of course he went PRO holocost myth. We contend AGAINST the holocost myth.

          Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 5:32 pm

          • I have picked up and read some books written by deniers. A lot of denier web sites too. Unfortunately I can’t get those days back. More importantly a lot of books written by real historians who actually interviewed people face to face and who did real research.

            Comment by srebrenica — January 21, 2016 @ 1:24 pm

            • Whom would you classify as a “real historian”? I would classify David Irving as a “real historian.” After spending a few years in prison for Holocaust denial, he is now allegedly a Holocaust believer. I don’t think that he is a True Believer; his is just going along with the Holocaust industry so that he can sell his books and make a living.,

              Comment by furtherglory — January 21, 2016 @ 1:44 pm

              • FG:
                I’ve never read anything that Irving has written. Perhaps I should, his “Hitler’s War” certainly got some good reviews back when it was published. I’d want the 1977 version.
                As for favorite authors, Laurence Rees, Ian Kershaw, Timothy Snyder and Richard Evans are certainly among my favorites. What I like about them is they don’t write like history professors. I tried to read Peter Longerich’s book on the Holocaust but it was simply too dry for me.
                As far as the Holocaust, Rees’ book on Auschwitz was very good, along with Saul Frielander’s “The Destruction of the European Jews.”
                I’m in the process of reading Anthony Beevor’s book on the Second World War.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 2:00 pm

                • I have a copy of the original first edition of “Hitler’s War” which I purchased in an antique store for next to nothing. The store owner did not know the value of the book.

                  I wrote about Lawrence Rees on this blog post: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/tag/laurence-rees/

                  I don’t know of any True Believer writer that I would recommend.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 21, 2016 @ 2:10 pm

                • If Rees talks about homicidal gas chambers in his book then he’s a liar. I saw him in a documentary and he did a very nice job lying there so why would I have any respect for a fellow like that.
                  I guess when it comes to people that write books you don’t see through it if they lie once I catch somebody lying then I have no respect for them and I won’t even read the book.
                  From what I can see so far you in your Holohuxsters here have no clue what good information is you continue to believe the lies and when people show you the truth you don’t have acknowledge it You avoid it.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 2:39 pm

                • Rees is a well known historian. You are just some hack with a video camera.
                  No offense.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 7:10 pm

                • Jeff there you go you didn’t answer my question about Rees does he talk about homicidal gas chambers if he talks about homicidal gas chambers then he he is a bold face Liar!
                  I guess you don’t care about his lies you just care about character assassination of people.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 7:15 pm

                • Yes, Jim, Rees talks about gas chambers. He talks about them because they existed.
                  Let me save you the trouble of replying:
                  He’s a LIAR!!!!!!! HE LIES!!!!!!!!
                  The Jews pulled my shows because they don’t want anyone to hear the TRUTH!!!!!!!
                  Jews belong to the SYNAGOGUE OF SATAN!!!!!!!!
                  Hey, did you hear the one about the Nazis STEAMING the Jews like LOBSTERS?????!!!!!!!????!!!
                  Did I get that right?
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 7:52 pm

                • Jeff……there you go backing up a liar.
                  Who cares about the truth right?

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 7:54 pm

                • Hang in there, Jim, I think you have him ‘on the ropes’. If he is resorting to name calling, it’s because he has nothing else and even in that he is demonstrating flawed judgment. I’ve seen your videos, a lot of them – excellent to begin with. Like I said in another post – the holocost mindset is like a chancre eating at the brain.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 7:58 pm

                • You misspelled Holocaust.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 8:09 pm

                • I misspell “holocost” on purpose because it is ALL ABOUT THE MONEY – THE “COST” TO ALL OF US – I won’t capitalize it and I won’t spell it correctly – it IS what it is FOR A REASON. Some say HOLOHOAX, etc. I choose this way. THE HOLOCOST IS THE BOOT AT OUR NECK and it is used to ravage our economy – still does because the brain dead politicians (ALL OF THEM) are locked into the holocost extortion to the detriment of their (and our) own countries.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 9:48 pm

                • Jeff, again, you do NOT address the issue, but attack the poster, and now Jim is in the ‘cross hairs’ of your attempt at scathing insults. Jim was nice referring to you and Wolf as ‘knuckleheads’ because the term is regional and may even sound whimsical. It’s his impression, summation of your total lack of intelligence, refusal to see and understand the truths before you. I think he is being nice, giving you WAY more credit than you deserve. So, if you are uninitiated in the verbiage of the northeast, here is the interpretation: A stupid person, low to questionable intelligence. Again, that sounds nice, so let me “southern it up for you”, since we don’t use such obscure terms in the south – but let me start that your approach to this discussion, ignoring the solid truths makes you truly dumb as a sack of rocks. Not a judgment, merely a conclusion from observing. Maybe it’s an inability to grasp the facts, so inundated with holocostomania that seems to have imprisoned as well as warps your mind, having a debilitating effect and also the soul – that which affects judgment of right and wrong.

                  I’ve watched a number of Jim’s videos. Have YOU? Or is it like your perusal of the book lists we mention, talk a big game, but when it comes down to it, maybe you have read 3 and likely those were lightly skimmed. So perhaps you didn’t read ANY, not really. We have.

                  Jim has offered, in numerous venues, to debate the pro-holocost supporters. No one takes him up on it because like Raul Hilberg when faced with direct challenge by Doug Christie, Fred Leuchter, he not only had no answer, he had no gumption to return to court for further questioning (referring to the Zundel trials in Canada). Jim mentioned this, I believe.

                  So, finally, you insult me, you insult Jim and others, with condescending snap judgments and flippant responses to his (and others’) contributions while challenging us to produce proof, but proof you refuse to accept – so you can say we didn’t provide proof. I presented this quote before, and will continue to do so about the jewish opinion concerning survivor testimony which explains a great deal since the indictment against the National Socialists to this day is predominantly because of ‘survivor testimony’:

                  “Most of the memoirs and reports of Holocaust survivors are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…” –Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65. This is just one example, one issue about which we speak, contend and defend.

                  SHEESH!

                  Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 7:57 pm

                • I think it’s funny when you get angry with me.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 8:07 pm

                • Jeff is still A Knucklehead

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 8:12 pm

                • Sticks and stones, Jim.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 8:56 pm

            • Sad to say then…..you are a lost cause for truth…

              Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 1:48 pm

  21. Sreb….

    If you are not catching on with the information that we are putting up here then you are a lost cause and a waste of my time.

    Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 1:07 pm

    • Jim – I’ve been looking at the so-called ‘information’ you have been putting up on this page, and frankly I find it sadly lacking so far in usefulness. Not that this is a big surprise to me since I’ve been reading your posts for quite a while now. I’m still waiting for you to refute the perpetrator statements on the link I posted btw – I have a feeling now that I will be waiting a long time🙂 On a more positive note, if I am wasting your time, then at least I’m stopping you from creating more of those terrible videos

      Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 2:22 pm

      • LOL
        Jim could spend his time fixing the videos he’s already made.

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 2:35 pm

        • Jeff, one must assume that you have watched Jim’s videos, which I seriously doubt any more than you have read his posts or the other MYTH BUSTER posts in this forum.

          Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 5:33 pm

          • Why yes, I have.
            I pointed out to Jim that he made a mistake on his Sondercommando video, that he was confusing Kapos and Sondercommando.
            I also pointed out to him on one of his virtual tours of Auschwitz that his theory that Zyclon B was sprinkled on corpses was wrong because it would not preserve corpses. There were others but that’s all I can think of right now.
            Jeff the Chinese-Irish Jew

            Comment by Jeff K, — January 20, 2016 @ 6:00 pm

            • Jeff…… I’m so glad you brought that up I finally found what I was looking for exactly what I thought…. and what they did with those bodies in the morgues here is the article from the book The Real Case for Auschwitz by Carlos Mottogno

              Quote from book….
              Disinfestation of the two morgues in the half-basement of crematorium II was normally practiced when corpses of detainees having died
              from typhus were placed there. Confirmation of this fact can be found in the following dispositions of the police president at Kattowitz (der
              Polizeipräsident in Kattowitz) concerning the inmates of the provisional police jail at Myslowitz where typhus had broken out in January 1943:
              “The bodies of persons who have died of typhus are to be treated with a disinfecting agent and an anti-lice solution and placed in coffins as soon as possible. The coffin must be closed at once and
              moved to a special hall. For incineration, the corpses will be transjferred to Auschwitz by hearse.”
              The project of using Leichenkeller 1 of crematorium II temporarily
              as an emergency disinfestation chamber employing hydrogen cyanide,
              as discussed above, must be viewed against the background of a strong
              flare-up of typhus which occurred at that time.
              Case closed!

              Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 6:10 pm

              • The report from the police officer didn’t say ZB.
                Jim, Mattagono is crazy.
                ZB is a pesticide, not something used to preserve corpses.

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 6:21 pm

                • Jeff you know the point I was trying to make the point was that use of ZB in the morgues was to keep the problem with the lice and disease down that’s the whole point of it. It had nothing to do with preserving them it had to do with keeping things in order so the problems wouldn’t get worest even in the mortuary.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 6:31 pm

              • Jim, the problem is that using ZB in the manner you describe is useless.
                For ZB to work you have to heat it. What is the worst thing to have around a corpse?
                Heat.
                Heat causes decomposition to speed up by encouraging bacterial growth.
                A decomposing corpse is a health hazard.
                If you put a corpse in a coffin and sprinkle ZB on it this also causes a hazard because if the coffin is not air tight the cyanide will leak out of it. In a closed hearse this would be deadly to the drivers. If it is air tight then this becomes a hazard to anyone subsequently opening the coffin unless they have a gas mask on.
                If you want to prevent a bug infestation or kill any lice left on the corpse the best way is to put the bodies in cold storage. This also prevents decomposition. A bigger issue are pests that are not effected by the cold, rats and mice, but you can prevent this by laying bait.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 6:30 am

            • Jim explained this very well. ZB was a strong fumigant apparently used throughout Europe in all realms. Made sense to attempt to continue to maintain some degree of hygiene with the dead bodies as well.

              Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 6:42 pm

              • No, he did not. See my above comment.
                What are you, Diane?
                Jim’s cheerleader, his secretary, his publicist? His agent?
                I noticed that you transcribed his interview with Fred Leuchter. That was awfully nice of you and I hope he did something nice for you, like send you a fruit basket.
                Jeff the Chinese-Irish Jew

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 6:35 am

              • Not only throughout Europe, Diane. In America too.


                Fumigation team in New Orleans, 1939 (Zyklon canisters visible)

                Comment by hermie — January 25, 2016 @ 8:45 am

      • At least I’m putting a face to it all, what are you doing?

        I get a kick of exposing HoloHuxters like yourself who have a problem assimilating truth but sure do like the eating all crap out there.
        You HoloHuxsters do a lot of complaining but produce nothing to prove your point. No websites, no videos, no nothing….just empty talk.
        You have NOTHING to show for all your efforts, at least I put my money where my mouth is….
        I have produced over a thousand videos on a lot of different topics but my pet topic is the HoloHoax.
        I Had at one time four 1 hr cable shows that the Jews succeed in getting taken off the air….Nice plug for free speech issues dealing with the Jews. When you get too close to them showing where they are wrong they come after you with a vengeance. There are NO free speech topics with the Jews they are the ones who misuse law to squelch free speech. Thats why I have such a disdain for them. Truly despicable people that can’t take the truth.
        And to think you you are in bed with them…….Sad….And the lies continue.

        Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 2:43 pm

        • OMG it gets worse – first it was hundreds, now its over a thousand videos lol. I think your cable shows were probably taken off air because they were either crap, or you ran out of money. I’m a great believer in free speech btw, and I am against laws that try to stop holocaust denial – I prefer to let deniers spew out your rubbish – trouble is you can’t actually have a debate that involves sources and facts as you Jim have proved in the last 2 days. btw I’m now curious – do you have a job in the real world ? how do you pay for this website? (actually can I suggest you get a web designer to look at your site – it’s like a throwback to the early days of the internet, and I’m talking about the late 80’s in the Netscape days)

          Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 3:00 pm

          • You you are right about my website is not the best in regards to my to my shows I’ve done 200 relating to the Holocaust itself and I’ve done close to 1000 with different subject matters so I’m not lying to you its just how you divide it up.
            I’m more proud of the ones I’m done dealing with the Holocaust itself.
            By the way YouTube took 700 of my videos down enough said for free speech.
            I guess YouTube took my all my videos down because they were so bad right….LOL.
            The Jews are pretty powerful especially on YouTube and Facebook. Nice to see your part of the clan maybe they will have you complaining about videos trying to take them off youtube and facebook also. Like I said the Jews and those that support them a despicable people, liars, deceitful and they will get the reward by God at some point in time I truly believe.

            Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 3:14 pm

            • personally I think you should be able to keep them up on there – I do believe in free speech – what worries me more is that you had over 700 on there having watched a few of them – btw its more likely that people found them offensive rather than a Jewish conspiracy – I would still defend your right to post them

              Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 4:01 pm

            • There were videos on YouTube of Jim’s that were NOT about the myth of the holocost but were taken down anyway. They categorically removed any and all of them.

              What might be offensive to one is NOT offensive to others and vice-versa. However, OUR viewpoint defying the myth is removed or eliminated and we are attempted to even by criminalized. YOUR view offends me to the core but I wouldn’t consider removing it (or you), being a significant part of the discussion.

              Oh, Jim was fine with his videos until he started discussing the holocost. That’s when they were all removed. Why is that? Why can’t we discuss the myth? New information comes to light to re-enforce the myth busters – oh, maybe that’s it – the cash cow might dry up, so to speak, if it turns out there was no holocost. Wouldn’t that be terrible. No more extortive payments to Israel or so-called survivors, (the numbers of those claiming reparations exceeded the number of jews in the Reich). Yes, this should be discussed and taking a position against it should not land you in jail … but it does in over 18 countries. Again, begs the question.

              Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 5:47 pm

              • Holocaust denial is against the law in 19 countries, not 18.

                Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 5:55 pm

              • Great points Diane! it nice to see that you’re pounding away at these Holohuxsters. If these Holohucksters were so concerned about free speech they wouldn’t be taken down my videos or trying to shut me down but no, they know what I speak is truth and they can’t and will not let anyone else l be given the opportunity to hear it on my local cable TV station.
                And they wouldn’t be making laws that criminalize this free speech -. If they have the truth you don’t put people in jail who criticize you. Give them a chance to make the case to debate them show them with straight facts where they are wrong. But they can’t so that’s why they make laws to put you in jail that’s why they make laws to take your cable shows off the air that’s why Facebook takes my Facebook site down because they cannot allow people to see the truth.
                It’s nice to see that you see through these hucksters. Hopefully by people reading this site people with open minds, people who aren’t afraid to search deep into what the internet says they will contribute to expose the holacaust lies for what they are and their whole world will come tumbling down on top of them.

                Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 5:59 pm

                • My hope is that if nothing else, your comments will plant a germinating seed that will produce the kind of fruit that will liberate people from the confinement of these lies. I’ve see that occur in young people I never thought such a thing possible – they are actually seeing ‘the light’ of truth in the seeming eternal (but fallible and temporary) myth of the holocost.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 6:44 pm

  22. FURTHERGLORY and all commentators taking part in this “nice conversation”. 1. I am perhaps the only one here who wore the Jellow Star and survived deportation. Due to the position hold by my late Father I am considered as “special child survivor”. 2. As a Jew I belive in G’D. 3. The Shoah (Holocaust) is for me matter of study within the frame of about TWO HUNDRED YEARS of European History and especially of WWII. 3. I started to ask “how and why events occured” since I was about 9/10 years old. Allmost suddenly I learnt the need to consider the historical background in order to answer the question “how could this occure?”. In 70 years I studied the cultural, social, economical development of East, Central, West and South Europe. 4. I have read memories and biographies of historical figures and talked also with Germans who had served in the Wehrmacht in those times of darkness. 5. I have studied the development of the Middle Age idea of PERFECT SOCIETY into the modern totalitarist ideologies; especially into the Nazi DEATH IDEOLOGY.
    So I tell You all:
    1. WWI and WWII had been the suicide of Europe and background of the Shoa = Holocaust.
    2. Nazism could develop and rise on power because of the social and economical crisis resulting from the foolish Versailles Treaty and President Wilson has a great historical guilt.
    3. Who joined the Nazi Party became involved in the Death Ideology. Those who enlisted in the SS could in no way avoid to get involved in crimes. In the Ghettoes and Lagers a so called “GUTTER KERL” – good guy – could some times close an eye and avoid to see or to understand some thing but not more as otherwise he himself faced, at least, to be sent in a Lager or in a STRAFF BATAILLON – Punishment unit – on the battlefront being himsefl spied on by rival “comrades”.
    4. As the Nazi ideology considered the Jews as lice and verms the use of Zyklon B – a German product easily available – in the Gas Chamber seems a symbol The few who knew the technical details of the function of the Gas Chambers and the Crematoria kept the secret and are now in the deserved hell. All the questioning here and in other posts seems therefore clear non sense.
    5. In the inteviews with Lanzmann my Father stated about the Shoah victims that “all had been martyrs, no one had been a saint”. This applies so to the stupid questioning about Sonderkommando as to the question asked by Hausner bothering withnesses “Why did you not oppose resistance?”. Not to mention the thesis of Hanna Arendt about the supposed duty of the Judenrat “avoid to take part”. Who had not to face an SS should shut mouth.
    6. The selection had to be made by doctors or medics to decide at once whether the victim had the destiny of sudden death in the Gas Chamber or the longer death by force labor. Survival had not been planned. Clearly the Nazis did not care about the safety or so of the prisoniers; death marches had been another murder instrument.
    As in this conversations as in others we are always the same commentators I think to have replied to many – perhaps every – question. One can wonder HOW AND WHY THE HOLOCAUST OCCURED checking any available information about the specific deeds or events and studying the historical background. The pure DENIAL OF THE EVENT HOLLOCAUST is only ANTISEMITISM which enjoys free speech and is now sponsored by the new real world power: Arab finance.
    Good bye. Wolf.

    Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 20, 2016 @ 9:43 am

    • Wolf Murmelstein wrote: “2. Nazism could develop and rise to power because of the social and economical crisis resulting from the foolish Versailles Treaty and President Wilson has a great historical guilt.”

      Woodrow Wilson was a great hero in America when I was a child. Back then, no one realized what harm that Wilson had done.

      Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 11:09 am

      • I think Wilson was a naive idealist who didn’t realize what he was walking into.
        Perhaps we can call Wilson a noble fool.
        The French were determined to slice their pound of flesh from the Germans no matter what the US or British thought. Though some of the more radical French ideas were shot down, for example the formation of a buffer state on the Rhine, the reality is that the French got a lot of what they wanted. The Czechs also duped Wilson into giving them the Sudetenland.
        Even the British were worried that things were going too far. The reality is, the solution the allies came up with after WW I was the worst of all possible worlds. It only temporarily weakened Germany but set up the conditions where a revived Germany would demand the return of territory and ethnic Germans…and make it difficult to stop the Germans from succeeding.
        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 11:22 am

        • Great analysis! You nailed it!

          Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 11:43 am

          • Thank you.
            I try not to be a one trick pony.
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 11:56 am

  23. these anti-semites

    Questioning or disputing the conventional ‘Holocaust’ story, or aspects of it, does not necessarily make one anti-Semitic/an anti-Semite.

    Make a note of it.

    Comment by eah — January 20, 2016 @ 2:37 am

    • EAH – Absolutely agree with you – and I’m all for challenging the conventional story btw. Just seems to me that a number of posters here either blame the Jews themselves for what happened to them, or just about deny anything did happen to the Jews. There is an undercurrent of anti-Semitism in a number of the comments too (not all but a lot)

      Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 9:43 am

      • You wrote: “There is an undercurrent of anti-Semitism in a number of the comments too (not all but a lot)”

        I have written several blog posts under the tag “anti-Semitism”. You can read all of them here:

        https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/tag/anti-semitism/

        Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 11:53 am

        • Thanks FG – I’ve read these

          I’m interested in why do you think everyone hates the Germans?

          Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 2:40 pm

          • Everyone hates the Germans because they have been demonized by the Jews.

            Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 2:52 pm

            • I don’t hate the Germans.
              Why would I hate the Germans?
              Jeff

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 4:41 pm

              • Everyone hates the Germans because they tried to get rid of the Jews.

                Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 5:49 pm

                • Well, in once sense you are right, and I can also detect tongue-in-cheek humor. Yep, the Germans wanted them out of the Reich. Nope, they weren’t planning to do it by extermination but rather by EMIGRATION.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 7:05 pm

          • What we need need to help some here…lol
            http://holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com/

            Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 2:53 pm

            • I don’t need any help, but thanks for the offer JIm – I work in Germany a lot and have done for many years. I think the Germans have done a great job of preventing the rise of right wing fascism. They may have done a poor job until the 70’s, but they have enacted laws that have stopped a re-emergence of Nazism, and lately they opened their borders to refugees, more so than any other country. Recent events in Cologne and other cities may show that they made a mistake, but they did it anyway. I have had conversations with many Germans about the Holocaust, and how they view it – all of them (and I mean all of them – more than 30 conversations) have accepted what happened, and quite rightly pointed out that the sins of the fathers (and grand fathers) do not determine the modern Germany. I’ve also been lucky enough to talk to 2 men through people I work with in Berlin that served in Russia in the Wehrmacht – they both told me more or less the same thing – they could not believe what people can do to other people, on both sides. Neither mentioned Jews btw, just Russians and Germans

              Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 3:30 pm

              • The Germans have been beaten into submission these past 70 years. They beat down dissidents. Over 100,000 have been jailed since 1945 because of some infraction against the new religion of the holocost or singing the Horst Wessel or celebrating some Third Reich figure’s bday. Again, an 87-year-old lady said on German public TV the holocost was a hoax and is now to face 1 year in prison. Re-emergence of national socialism? How about the wanton out-of-control growth of communism, soviet style? Their country is now being over run by NON Germans and they appear to not like it (wow, who knew!) The German people will not be OK until they claim and assert their GERMAN-NESS. The sins of the fathers? Germany was on its way to becoming possibly THE greatest nation of the world – that’s why all jewry had to stop them.

                Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 5:51 pm

      • Good grief – criticizing the hollywood version of the holocost isn’t antisemitic. That’s ridiculous. What is equally ridiculous is here is a 95-year-old former medic who HELPED the jews, as that was his job in the camp, and because he was a German IN A CAMP, he is being prosecuted.

        Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 3:26 pm

        • Oh she’s back lol – so Diane what evidence do you have that he helped the Jews?

          Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 3:35 pm

          • Srebrenica wrote: “so Diane what evidence do you have that he helped the Jews?”

            And where is yours that he killed or helped to kill them? Oh yes, I was forgetting. Some testimonial ‘evidence’ coming within the next weeks. Testimonial ‘evidence’ failed to conclusively prove the existence of alien abductions, ghosts, witchcraft, the German homicidal gas chambers of WW1, Jesus Christ’s miracles, the German corpse factories of both world wars, and Saddam’s anthrax mobile factories. But a few more testimonies about Hitler’s alleged homicidal gas chambers will probably settle the matter. Don’t make me laugh. What a Orwellian farce…

            Comment by hermie — January 21, 2016 @ 5:48 am

            • Oh crap, you just brought up witchcraft.
              I suspect we’ll be seeing a video about elves very soon…
              Jeff the Chinese-Irish Jew

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 5:57 am

              • Jeff wrote: “Oh crap, you just brought up witchcraft.”

                You don’t like confessions anymore, Jeff? Only probative when Israel’s founding myth and the victors’ ‘good war’ myth are concerned?

                Jeff wrote: “I suspect we’ll be seeing a video about elves very soon”

                Two trolls on here are enough. No elves are needed…😉

                Comment by hermie — January 24, 2016 @ 10:38 am

                • Your comments gave me a GOOD chuckle, Hermie! Thanks!

                  Comment by Diane King — January 24, 2016 @ 11:50 am

                • I guess all confessions and witness statements are useless. I suspect we’ll have to open all the prisons soon.
                  Because, naturally, all of the convicts are not guilty because we can’t depend on their confessions. Or eyewitness statements or evidence. Because it is all a forgery, created by the Zionist Overlords.
                  Oh crap, you just said trolls.
                  Are we going to get videos about trolls now?
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 24, 2016 @ 12:30 pm

                • Jeff wrote: ” I suspect we’ll have to open all the prisons soon.”

                  Or to just accept that justice is fallible and imprisons a number of innocent people when solely based on testimonies and/or confessions. Or even better, to use advanced scientific techniques to check the accuracy or falsity of unreliable evidence such as testimonies and confessions.

                  Jeff wrote: “we can’t depend on their confessions. Or eyewitness statements or evidence.”

                  Or evidence??? What a great concession that confessions and testimonies are no evidence!

                  (You had already conceded that in past talkings, but I can see that a lil’ reminder wasn’t unnecessary.)

                  Jeff wrote: “Because it is all a forgery, created by the Zionist Overlords.”

                  Why would you go without another good reductio ad absurdum when possible? So much fun. So useful…

                  Jeff wrote: “Are we going to get videos about trolls now?”

                  Only if you ask me to post some on here. Want some testimonial evidence about trolls on video, Jeff?

                  Diane King wrote: “Your comments gave me a GOOD chuckle, Hermie! Thanks!”

                  My pleasure, Diane. Even utterly evil people like ourselves need a good laugh sometimes.😉

                  Comment by hermie — January 25, 2016 @ 7:12 am

                • Why yes, Hermie, please do post videos about trolls.
                  If it means you won’t spout any more stupid crap about Zionist I would welcome it.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 25, 2016 @ 5:12 pm

                • edit: “why wouldn’t you go” instead of “why would you go”

                  Comment by hermie — January 25, 2016 @ 7:14 am

                • Jeff wrote: “Why yes, Hermie, please do post videos about trolls.”

                  Are you sure you don’t prefer me to post testimonial ‘evidence’ about alien abductions or Marian apparitions? To change a little.

                  Jeff wrote: “If it means you won’t spout any more stupid crap about Zionist I would welcome it.”

                  Crap so stupid you’ve been completely unable to disprove it in any satisfactory manner. So humiliating, isn’t it? I know you’re not the sharpest knife in the drawer, but that’s hardly an excuse for that.

                  Comment by hermie — January 26, 2016 @ 4:30 am

                • I’ve disproved you over and over again….and I didn’t need to resort to posting videos about elves.
                  It’s simple for you. Any time someone argues something you resort to squeaking about scary Zionists and their ability to manipulate everything.

                  I’ve gone step by step with you, Hermie. I’ve looked at events as they happened along with the reactions of the players. Your argument? Well, those events were manipulated behind the scenes by those who somehow knew how things were going to work out,

                  Even a dull knife knows that is impossible. You want me to believe that sovereign nations run by unpredictable people can be so skillfully manipulated……for what? The creation of the state of Isreal? This could have happened without war. The British possessed Palestine, Hermie. Are you saying that these hazy players couldn’t get what they wanted without war? These players could exert their power and influence without war, without the “lie” of the Holocaust.
                  Pure loony toons.
                  I hearby dub this silly bullshit conspiracy theory the “Daffy Duck Conspiracy Theory.”
                  Congratulations, Hermie. It now has a name.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff — January 26, 2016 @ 7:46 am

                • Jeff wrote: “I’ve disproved you over and over again”

                  Are you aware that imaginary victories in dreams don’t count?😉

                  Jeff wrote: “Pure loony toons. I hearby dub this silly bullshit conspiracy theory the “Daffy Duck Conspiracy Theory.””

                  Another one of your reductio ad absurdum fallacies. Well-known deception technique…

                  Zionists have owned both candidates in each US presidential election for decades. As early as the year 1919, the Zionist Organization of America was able to publish a 240-page book full of statements by puppets…er members of the American Congress…in support of the Zionist grabbing of Palestine and the Balfour declaration (https://ia700409.us.archive.org/19/items/americanwarcongr00zion/americanwarcongr00zion.pdf). What makes you believe that those guys are unable to influence and direct the US government and various other governments for their own interests?

                  Comment by hermie — January 27, 2016 @ 3:29 pm

                • Maybe you should write a script, Hermie.
                  Call it:
                  The Attack of the Zionists
                  It can fit any genre. Horror, Sci-Fi, Fantasy.
                  If you make it a horror flick it can be about a group of brave Aryans trapped in a building surrounded by the evil undead Zionists.
                  If it’s a Sci-Fi movie it can be about the earth attacked by an evil space-faring race of Zionists.
                  If you make it a fantasy it can be about a brave group of Aryans going on a quest to free Middle-Earth from Zionar and his evil bands of feral Jews.
                  Just a thought.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 27, 2016 @ 5:37 pm

                • Jeff….. We already have a movie and a great script about the HoloHoax it’s called the Shoah, which really should of been named Show -Us
                  This site will show you what we are about, and the truth the HoloHuxsters have ben hiding from you for the last 75 yrs
                  http://germarrudolf.com/germars-views/an-introduction-to-historical-revisionism/

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 27, 2016 @ 5:43 pm

                • Excellent website!

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 27, 2016 @ 6:54 pm

                • Yawn.
                  Seen it all before, Jim.
                  Weren’t there like 66 questions and answers about the Holocaust that deniers dreamed up? That the guy at Nizkor shot down?
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 27, 2016 @ 8:30 pm

                • Maybe you have seen it before, though I doubt it and NIzkor – I don’t think so. Besides, Jim posted something by Germar Rudolf that even the most skeptical have to agree that he is a reliable investigator. Well, I’ll make it easy on you. There are just 40 here, though I have another 10-question discussion I’ll add too.

                  40 QUESTIONS ON THE HOLOCAUST
                  [transcriber comments]

                  CCFIILE.COM

                  1). What proof exists that the Nazis practiced genocide or deliberately killed 6 million Jews?

                  None. The only evidence is the contradictory testimony of individual survivors and no survivor claims actually to have witnessed any gassing. There was no hard evidence whatsoever. No mounds of ashes. No piles of clothes. No crematory capable of doing the job. No human soap. No lampshades made out of human skin, no record, no demographic statistics. On the other hand, there exists extensive evidence of a forensic demographic, analytical documentary, anecdotal and comparative nature, which clearly proves the impossibility of such a figure as 6 million Jewish dead, an exaggeration of possibly 1,000%.

                  2) How did German concentration camps differ from American relocation camps, which interned Japanese and German[and Italian] Americans during World War II.

                  Except for the name, the only difference was that the Germans interned persons, who were a real or a suspected threat to the German war effort, whereas the Americans interned persons on the basis of their race or national origin alone.

                  3) Why did the German authorities intern Jews in the concentration camps?

                  Because the Germans considered the Jews a direct threat to their national sovereignty and survival, correctly, as it turned out. Jews were overwhelmingly represented in Germany and communist subversion during the Weimar period. On a per capita basis, Jews were highly over represented in government, commercial, and media positions; however, all suspected security risks, not just Jews, were in danger of internment once the war broke out. On March 24, 1933, international Jewry declared war on Germany and ordered a worldwide boycott of German goods, simply because the German government had removed Jews from influential positions and transferred power back to the German people. The boycott order and the Jewish war against Germany were reported in the world print and broadcast media of the time. [Also in 1939, Chaim Weizmann sent a letter to Churchill promising total Jewish support in fighting against Germany.] False stories of German death camps were, in fact, circulated even before the outbreak of WWII; therefore, the German view of the Jewish people as enemy aliens would seem to have been fully justified.

                  4) Did Simon Wiesenthal once admit that there were never any death camps [even if there were] on German soil?

                  Yes, in Books and Bookmen, April 1975, issue, he claims the gassing of all the Jews took place in Poland.

                  5) Dachau is in Germany. If even Simon Wiesenthal now admits it was not a death camp, why do thousands of American veterans say it was?

                  Because after the Allies captured Dachau, an incidentally murdered dozens of the former staff without trial, thousands of G.I.s were led through the camp and showed buildings alleged to be gas chambers. This story was later quietly expunged from official holocaust lore because it became too difficult to maintain in the face of known fact and because Dachau was in the Allied occupation zone, where access to the camp was too easy and unrestricted. The brief lifespan of the Dachau death camp version gave rise to the first critical examination and questioning of the holocaust myth by historians and by some Allied veterans, who noticed discrepancies in what they had seen and what they read in the official accounts. It would be many years, though, before this early holocaust revisionism gained momentum.

                  6) Auschwitz is in Poland, not Germany. Is there any proof that gas chambers for the purpose of killing people existed at Auschwitz?

                  No. The gas chamber exhibited to tourists at Auschwitz could not possibly have been used to carry out executions. It is far too small, and it’s not even air tight. In the 1980s, American expert, Fred Leuchter, who builds gas chambers for American penal systems, took scrapings from the walls of the Auschwitz gas chamber for chemical analysis. He found no cyanide residue at all. The Auschwitz exhibit is a fake, pure and simple – a flimsy tourist trap.

                  7) If Auschwitz wasn’t a death camp, what was its true purpose?

                  It was a large-scale manufacturing complex. Synthetic rubber called buna was made there, and its inmates were used as a workforce, in the same way in which inmate labor is increasingly being used in correctional systems throughout the United States today.

                  8) What about the infamous Zyklon B gas?

                  Zyklon B is a commercially manufactured compound of hydrocyanic gas. It has a number of widespread industrial uses, including the fumigation of lice-infested clothing, the purpose for which it was applied at Auschwitz. Zyklon B is still manufactured worldwide and is commonly used and available today.

                  9) If Auschwitz was not an extermination camp, why did former Commandant Rudolf Hoess confess that it was.

                  Hoess was captured by the Russians and Polish communists and brutally tortured. He signed his confession, which is the sole source for the figure of 6 million dead Jews in English, a language that he could not read. Some pages of the original document are literally stained with Hoess’ blood. Hoess was then conveniently executed so he could not be cross examined.

                  10) How long does it take to fully ventilate an area fumigated with Zyklon B?

                  About 20 hours. The whole procedure is extremely involved and technical. Gas masks have to be used and well-trained technicians only are employed.

                  11) Rudolf Hoess said in his confession, that his men would enter the gas chamber ten minutes after the Jews had died and remove the bodies. How do you explain this?

                  It can’t be explained because it couldn’t have happened like that. Had the Germans done this, they would have suffered the same fate as the allegedly exterminated Jews.

                  12) Hoess said in his confession, that his men would smoke cigarettes as they pulled dead Jews out of chambers, which 10 minutes before had been filled with gas. Isn’t Zyklon B explosive? [Not to mention the Germans wouldn’t have been doing the heavy lifting here. Had this happened, they’d have gotten the other inmates to do this, which was suggested in a number of ‘movies’ on the subject.]

                  Highly so. The Hoess confession is obviously false, and the 6 million figure as well.

                  13) How could such a mass murder program have been kept secret from Jews who were scheduled for execution? How could the pope, the Vatican, the International Red Cross (IRC), and Allied military intelligence not know?

                  Given the acknowledged efficiency and penetration of the OSS, British MI5 and the Soviet NKVD into the Third Reich, it could not have been kept secret nor can one imagine any reason for the Allies, who were fighting to destroy Germany not to make use of such a potentially powerful propaganda weapon, had there been any contemporary evidence at all during the war, that such an event was occurring.

                  14) How many Jews actually died in German concentration camps during the war?

                  About 300,000.

                  15) How did they die?

                  Mainly from recurring typhus epidemics that ravaged a war-torn Europe during the period. Typhus is a disease which invariably appears wherever people are jammed together for long periods without bathing. It’s carried by lice, which infects hair and clothes. Ironically, if the Germans had used more Zyklon B for disinfectant purposes, more Jews might have survived the concentration camps. Jewish prisoners as well as many others also died from starvation and lack of medical attention towards the end of the war when virtually all rail and road transport had come to a standstill due to the intense Allied bombing campaign.

                  16) What is the difference whether 6 million Jews or 300,000 died?

                  5,700,000. The key question is whether or not there was a deliberate, systematic attempt on the part of the Third Reich to exterminate the Jews of Europe. As the evidence clearly shows, that there was not, and the focus of world attention now needs to shift to the identity, the activities, and the financial and political motivations of those who have inflicted on all humanity for the past 70 years, the grotesque, slanderous and evil lie that there was a holocaust.

                  17) Many Jewish survivors of the death camps say they saw bodies being piled up in pits and burned. How much gasoline would have been used to perform this act?

                  A lot more than the Germans had access to or could have afforded to waste during the Second World War, that’s for sure.

                  18) Can bodies be burned in pits?

                  No. It’s impossible for human bodies to be totally consumed by flames in this manner as not enough heat to be generated in open pits. It is impossible to completely destroy human bodies en masse with either gasoline, napalm, or in any other way in open pits. The holocaust experts who claim otherwise are either parroting what they’ve been told without bothering to check their facts or else, they’re lying.

                  19) Holocaust authors claim the Nazis were able to cremate bodies in about 10 minutes. How long does it take to incinerate a body, according to professional funeral operators?

                  About 2 hours.

                  20) Why did concentration camps have crematory ovens?

                  To dispose efficiently and sanitarily of the corpses dead from typhus and other diseases.

                  21) Given a 100% duty cycle of all the known crematoria in all the camps in German-controlled territory, what is the maximum number of corpses, which it would have been possible to incinerate during the entire time the camps were in existence?

                  About 430,600.

                  22) Can a crematory oven be operated 100% of the time?

                  No. 50% of the time is a very generous estimate or 12 hours per day. Crematory ovens have to be cleaned thoroughly and regularly when in heavy operation.

                  23) On the average, how much ash is left from a cremated corpse?

                  After the bone is ground down into powder, a separate time consuming process in itself, about a shoe box full.

                  24) If 6 million people were incinerated by the Nazis, what happened to the ashes?

                  Well, that remains to be explained. 6 million bodies would produce literally mountains of ash, tons upon tons, yet there have been no discoveries of any huge deposits of ash in the Auschwitz area or anywhere else in Europe.

                  25) Did Allied wartime photos of Auschwitz taken from the air show any signs of crematory in full-blast operation?

                  No. These photographs do not reveal even a trace of the immense amount of smoke, which must have hung constantly over the camp, nor do they show any evidence of the alleged open pits, where the bodies were burned.

                  26) What did the International Red Cross have to say about the whole holocaust issue?

                  A report of the visit of an IRC delegation to Auschwitz in September 1944, pointed out that internees were allowed to receive packages and that rumors of gas chambers could not be verified. The full official report of the International Red Cross on the Second World War makes no mention at all of the so-called holocaust or any of the wilder allegations connected with the so-called holocaust. Interestingly, in 2011, over 70 years after the war’s end, the liberal media in America and Europe began running a series of articles claiming that the Red Cross was full of Nazi sympathizers. This charge is entirely bogus, and it may be chalked up to belated Jewish attempts at damage control, as the holocaust myth crumbles steadily in the light of factual examination and critical analysis.

                  27) Is the diary of Anne Frank genuine?

                  Not as published, no. The evidence compiled by Ditlieb Felderer of Sweden and Dr. Robert Faurisson of France proves conclusively that the published version of the famous diary is a literary hoax. There was a girl named Anne Frank and sections of the diary appear to be genuine, including several wherein she describes adolescent lesbian sexual experiences, which were later excised from the published text. In 1950, Anne Frank’s father sued author, Meyer Levin, the actual writer of the diary, over royalties from the book. A Jewish judge in New York ordered the records of the court case sealed for 100 years. When the original diary was put on display a few years later, it was noticed, that the most poignant sections of the book were interpolations, written in a forged handwriting in ballpoint pen, a writing instrument which was not invented until 1950. The original diary was swiftly removed from exhibit and whisked away into a safety deposit box in Israel. It has never been produced for examination, since then, despite repeated attempts by scholars to view it.

                  28) What about all the numerous photographs and film footage allegedly taken in German concentration camps showing emaciated corpses and people. Are these faked?

                  Some are, but most of the fakery lies in the captioning. Corpses of German air raid victims, for example, are labeled as dead Jews. The one famous and oft reprinted photo purports to show a “Nazi SS man about to shoot a mother holding her child”. On closer examination of the blurry print with a magnifying glass, it is clear to military historians familiar with the uniforms and weapons of the period, that the “killer” is a Red army soldier, wielding a Russian-made carbine. The exterminationists’ habit of blaming the Germans for atrocities actually carried out by the Soviet dictator, Josef Stalin, remains common, even though some of the more notorious examples, like the Katyn Forest massacre of Polish prisoners had now been properly laid at the door of the Kremlin. But this kind of fraud continues to be perpetrated by holocaust ‘experts’ is not surprising in view of the fact that almost all of them espouse Marxist or extreme left wing views and are as quick to apologize for and explain away Stalin’s butcheries as they are to invent fraudulent crimes attributed to Adolf Hitler. The almost universally leftist political and social orientation of holocaust defenders is important and should always be born in mind when examining their claims. Letting Stalin off the hook is almost as important to them as blackening and defaming the memory of Hitler and the German people.

                  29) What was the role of the Vatican during the time in which 6 million Jews were allegedly exterminated?

                  Had there been an extermination plan being carried out in a predominantly Catholic country like Poland, the Vatican would certainly have been in a position to learn about it. Since no such plan existed, the Vatican had no need to speak out about it.

                  30) What evidence is there that Adolf Hitler ordered the extermination of the Jews?

                  None. No documentary evidence of any kind indicating a deliberate extermination plan on the part of the Nazis has ever come to light. No signed order from Hitler, from Reichsfuhrer SS Heinrich Himmler or from any other functionary of the Third Reich, ordering the extermination of the Jews has ever been discovered. The Nazis were meticulous records keepers and literally tons of documents were seized by the Allies at the end of the war, so many that it took Allied archivists and scholars years to organize, file and catalogue them all. Nothing – zip! Nada.

                  31) Did the Germans and the zionists collaborate before and during the war?

                  Absolutely. Both groups were interested in removing the Jews from Europe. The zionists wanted the Jews shipped to Palestine and they maintained friendly relations throughout the war. The German official in charge of shipping thousands of Jews [900,000] of Jews to then British-occupied Palestine, including future Israel Prime Minister Menachin Began, was Adolf Eichmann. After the war, the holocaust industry considered this secret so volatile and dangerous, that Eichmann was abducted by the Israeli Mossad and, subsequently, murdered in order to silence him.

                  32) How many Jews were in areas, which came to be controlled by the Germans during the Second World War?

                  Slightly less than 4 million.

                  33) How many Jews fled deep into the Soviet Union to escape the Nazis?

                  Over 2 million. The Germans didn’t have access to them to kill them [that was their intent].

                  34) If European Jews weren’t exterminated by the Nazis, what happened to them?

                  After the war, most of Jews emigrated to Palestine, the United States, Argentina, Canada and Great Britain. Except for about 300,000, they are all accounted for.

                  35) How does the Holocaust story benefit the Jewish people today?

                  It shields them from any criticism over their political, economic and social behavior. It’s instrumental in raising immense sums of ‘guilt’ money, especially from the German government. It justifies aid to the state of Israel, totally almost $10 billion per year from various sources. Israel has received almost $70 billion in assorted holocaust reparations and the ante is growing every year. It’s clearly in the interest of Israel with the Jewish people, to keep the scam going.

                  36) Are films like “Holocaust”, “Schindler’s List” and the “Winds of War” documentaries?

                  Hollywood movies are not history and they’re not intended to be. They are fictionalized dramas. The characters in movies are actors, not real people, who are being very highly paid for their portrayal of events that did not, in fact, occur. They read their lines from a screening play, written by Hollywood script writers, a profession, where Jews are very highly over represented as they are in the studios and the creative and the financial sectors of film making. Hollywood is such an extremely unreliable source of history that in recent years, even mainstream reviewers and commentators have begun to express doubt and suspicion over certain films. For example, the character of Oscar Schindler, as portrayed by Liam Neeson in Spielberg’s production of “Schindler’s List”, was sanitized to the point of being unrecognizable. Schindler was portrayed as almost saintly and yet none of those still living, who remember the man, have a single good word to say about him. The real Schindler was a confidence artist, a thief, a libertine, and a degenerate gambler, who indulged freely in forced sexual relations with young female camp inmates. He later abandoned his wife and fled with his mistress to Brazil, after embezzling a large sum of money. Other major directors like Oliver Stone, who’ve come under fire because their portrayals of historical characters like Nixon and events like the JFK assassination reflect a paranoid obsession with the most bizarre of left wing conspiracy theories.

                  37) How many books have been published, which refute some aspect of the standard Jewish claims about the holocaust?

                  Over 100 with more in the works.

                  38) But aren’t all those who question the holocaust antisemitic or neo-Nazis?

                  Some are; although, why such people should be denied the same right to advance their viewpoint which liberal democracy grants so freely to Jews and liberals in this purportedly free society, is never explained. Most revisionists, however, are academics – genuine scholars, who seek only the truth. Many hold liberal or libertarian views; although, these views often change, as they’re subjected to the intense persecution which accompanies any deviation from the official orthodoxy of the holocaust.

                  39) What has happened to historians, who dispute the official version of the holocaust?

                  A variety of unpleasant things. Significantly, the Jews have always refused to debate the facts of the holocaust openly with revisionists. An Internet group, allegedly set up for this purpose, called “Nizkor” does not, in fact, debate revisionists but engages in hysterical campaigns of ad hominem abuse against anyone who dares to express any dissent or doubt regarding the holocaust. It’s clear from many of the postings to Nizkor’s Internet play groups, that they have attracted a number of people, mostly Jews, but some left liberal gentiles as well, who are motivated by intense racial bigotry and ideological hatred of anyone who disagrees with them and who, in some cases, appear to be severely mentally and emotionally disturbed. The Jews respond to any questioning of the holocaust with hatred, violence and persecution, which in itself is the surest give-away that they have something to hide. In many countries, those who ask politically incorrect or searching questions about the holocaust are arrested, tortured and imprisoned. Dr. Robert Faurisson was assaulted by a Jewish gang, who beat him so badly that he was almost crippled. In California, a major revisionist book seller’s offices were burned and in Toronto, revisionist author Ernst Zundel’s home was almost destroyed in an arson attack. Zundel himself was subjected to a bizarre series of show trials, lasting over 10 years by the Canadian government. After finally being acquitted, he was denied Canadian citizenship and eventually deported to Germany, where he spent 5 years in prison for questioning the official version of that country’s history. An American citizen, Gerhard Lauck of Lincoln, Nebraska was kidnapped by the German government and served a lengthy prison sentence in Germany for the so-called crime of writing pro-National Socialist commentary in the United States, where it’s legal. Another American citizen, Hans Schmidt of Florida was also abducted, held in prison in Germany for almost a year and released only after an international outcry. Schmidt’s so-called crime was writing a pro-revisionist article in English and a newsletter published and distributed in the United States. German nationalist, Manfred Roeder has been in prison so many times, he’s lost count. Revisionists have been stripped of jobs and academic posts, denied tenure in universities, victimized by harassing lawsuits, received bombs in the mail and subjected to constant death threats from Jews and Marxists. These are not the reactions of innocent people. Innocent people, who are accused of a crime or fraud do not respond by trying to kill, imprison or forcibly silence their accusers. More than anything else, the behavior of the Jews and the governments they influence so strongly proves that the holocaust is a fraud. If the holocaust was true, neither the Jews nor any state authority would need to use force to silence criticism any more than force need be used against people, who believe the earth is flat. The arrests, imprisonments, assaults and torture used are the equivalent of a full confession on the part of the Jewish people that they are contemptible liars, who have imposed the most massive and vicious hoax in history on all of humanity and have used that hoax as an excuse to rob us blind, steal another people’s country and then to slaughter that country’s original inhabitants at will.

                  40) Have these thuggish tactics succeeded in silencing revisionists?

                  No. They have only made revisionists more determined than ever to ensure that the truth comes out and that the nations of the earth understand how the Jewish people have lied to them, defrauded them and robbed them for over a century now with the holocaust lie. There can be little doubt that in succeeding generations, the holocaust will be accepted by mainstream historians and the public at large for what it is – a politically inspired hoax.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 27, 2016 @ 8:49 pm

                • Yeah, Nizkor destroyed what you wrote years ago.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 27, 2016 @ 8:55 pm

                • Nizkor is a website from the past. Most of the original people who wrote this website are now dead. Many years ago, when I participated in the news groups, there was much discussion about the facts of the Holocaust. At that time, Nizkor was the number one source of information.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nizkor_Project

                  Here is a page from the Niskor Project:

                  http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/camps/maidanek/

                  “MAIDANEK. Extermination camp located in German-occupied Poland about 2 miles from Lublin. It was regarded as in the same class as Belzec and Sobibor. Like Belzec, Maidanek was originally a labor camp but was transformed into a death camp … Unlike Belzec, it had some industrial activity. Non-Jewish prisoners were admitted. At first death was induced by carbon monoxide asphyxiation, but later hydrocyanic, or prussic, acid fumes were used following successful tests at Belzec. It is estimated that 1.5 million inmates were gassed at Maidanek.* After Russian troops discovered the camp on July 23, 1944, Konstatin Simonov, a Soviet writer, wrote a full account of the death camp for Pravda. In a special issue the London Illustrated News published photographs of the gas chambers and ovens at Maidanek.” (Snyder, Dr. Louis L, Encyclopedia of the Third Reich. Paragon House, New York, 1989.) * Maidanek victim estimates are unreliable; the total is probably far less than the one provided above.

                  End quote from Nizkor

                  The number of Jewish deaths at Majdanek is now down to 59,000, but Nizkor has not been updated. The Nizkor website still says that 1.5 million Jews were gassed at Majdanek.

                  http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/camps/maidanek/1998-keren-images.html

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 28, 2016 @ 10:34 am

                • To tell if a Pro-Holocaust site is good it would be saying the things the Revisionists sites are saying, so that tells you how far they are off base.
                  Thats not going to happen so they continue the lie thinking no one will notice.
                  The HoloHuxsters have lost the battle but in their mind they think they’ve won because they have 18 countries that put people in jail for what I am saying here.
                  You would think the HoloHuxsters would scream bloody hell about the attack on peoples free speech. But they are so fill of hate themselves it clouds their senses, and they go along with these attacks on our human rights to free speech and expression.

                  At some point tin time their Hate laws and Anti-Semitc bullshit will come here to the States and what will they say then.
                  I guess they will be pretty lonely posting on these type of sites with no one to talk to and argue with.
                  I guess they will have to argue among themselves and say 6million. no 5 million, no 1 million…..and so on and so on they go with their circular reasoning
                  until they come up with the right numbers that we put out. But they won’t be in jail for it. On the plus side….
                  I will have good company in jail though and a lot of laughs seeing how these Psychopaths get along.
                  When the Jews have an enemy they all rise up and become one tribe to fight the enemy, when they have no one to rise up against them then they begin to devour themselves. But I honestly feel that God will intervene in matters before that day comes and judge these HoloHuxsters for what they are ….Bold Face Liars.
                  And they can join the crowd mention here that will be gnashing their teeth..

                  1 Corinthians 6:9-10English Standard Version (ESV)

                  9 Or do you not know that the unrighteous[a] will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality,[b] 10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

                  Jim Rizoli
                  Revisionist and Proud of it….
                  CCFIILE.COM
                  RIZOLITV.COM

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 28, 2016 @ 11:58 am

                • Don’t be upset! Just keep on doing the good work that you have done so far.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 28, 2016 @ 1:44 pm

                • Thanks, FG. Jim’s not upset nor am I nor are the rest of us. I have been used to dealing with willful ignorance. Not a problem. Thanks for the encouragement!

                  Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 4:54 pm

                • No surrender!
                  Many people are turning to the truth and are learning so I’m not worried about the people that don’t care They have their issues and they’re going to have to deal with them and everyone has to answer to God in the end so not a big deal.
                  Dealing with the Holocaust subject is a very good learning experience About people.
                  How gullible people are how dishonest people are you find all those things out when you start talking about the Holocaust.
                  The only other topic that is just as controversial is religion but then again the Holocaust Cult and their following belong to a religion.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 28, 2016 @ 5:04 pm

                • You can see where someone’s orientation rests by comments about ‘gassings’. You listen for the key points and how much they have been immersed in mainstream political correctness and where to start in helping release them from the tight grip of holohoax holocost indoctrination. This country is gone, it just hasn’t quit ‘kicking’ yet. But there are those we seek and are interested in finding ‘the lost sheep’. There are those out there who feel they are alone in emerging into an awareness of the truth about the holocost. We want to find them.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 5:31 pm

                • Over a century??????????
                  Diane, WW II ended 71 years ago.
                  Are you going back further in time?

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 28, 2016 @ 12:09 pm

                • Frankly, I don’t know what you mean. I reread my post and there was no reference to WWII a century ago. I KNOW it was 70 some years ago. So what’s your issue? I said: “Maybe you have seen it before, though I doubt it and NIzkor – I don’t think so. Besides, Jim posted something by Germar Rudolf that even the most skeptical have to agree that he is a reliable investigator. Well, I’ll make it easy on you. There are just 40 here ….”

                  Then you said: “Over a century?????????? Diane, WW II ended 71 years ago. Are you going back further in time?”

                  So, um…. what????

                  Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 5:21 pm

                • Well, let’s see. Leuchter’s report absolutely predates Nizkor, I believe Rudolph’s report does as well as it was written in the early 90’s. So, if Nizkor is too old to be utilized then so is Leuchter and Rudolph.
                  That’s nonsense. Nizkor is a great website, I recommend it to anyone.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 28, 2016 @ 12:47 pm

                • Nizkor is outdated and inaccurate. You wrote: “if Nizkor is too old to be utilized, then so is Leuchter and Rudolf.” That statement does not make any sense.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 28, 2016 @ 1:37 pm

                • Mr. Leuchter and Rudolf provided scientific data via the scientific method in their findings and concluded NO GAS CHAMBERS, NO GASSINGS. Further, NO document to assert or even insinuate a FINAL SOLUTION of extermination.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 4:57 pm

                • You are correct, but one does have to be a scientist in order to know that there were no gas chambers. All you have to do is to go and look at the so-called gas chambers. Then you will see with your own eyes that these buildings were NOT gas chambers. You don’t have to climb down inside the so-called gas chambers. You can just look at the gas chamber in the main camp, and see that it is across the street from the SS hospital, and there is no crematorium to store the bodies until they can be burned. You have to remember that the German people are the smartest people in the world, yet they could not figure out that you need a crematorium to store the bodies and plenty of ovens to burn the bodies.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 28, 2016 @ 7:36 pm

                • It Is pretty simple to determine if there was a gas chamber there like FG said just look at the pictures you’ll see that they were no fans, no heating device, no holes in the roof in the buildings they were not not capable of being gas chambers they were used for other means but not gas chambers.
                  Facts Are Facts!

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 28, 2016 @ 7:43 pm

                • FG, the operative phrase, among the many sterling points is: ” You have to remember that the German people are the smartest people in the world,” IF their intent had been extermination, they would NOT have transported hundreds (even thousands) of people hundreds of miles to set them up in camps with hospitals, kitchens, sauna’s (for pete’s sake), shave their heads, give them clothes, delouse them… to kill them. They’d have done with the Soviets did, as mentioned before, and just shoot them – back of the head – CHEAP by comparison. Hitler was a dictator, who would have questioned him!!! Oh, yeah, there was NEVER evidence of an extermination order … (keep forgetting that).

                  Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 7:49 pm

                • You are correct. People today forget that Hitler was loved by the German people.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 28, 2016 @ 7:58 pm

                • Hitler was most definitely loved by the German people, still is for those who knew him. Germany was divided, “But in the Third Reich, we all became Germans.” From Ingrid Rimland’s LEBENSRAUM II: The Dreamof Land and Peace, (p62). “Say what you will…the Fuhrer had a vision. He gave us back our soul.” (Thank you for the opportunity to share these things, FG!)

                  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pdh7a-SrZs (in spite of the fact that this was produced at the Holocost Center, it’s not bad.)

                  Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 8:39 pm

                • Leuchter and Rudolph predate Nizkor. If we need to discard Nizkor we need to discard them.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 28, 2016 @ 5:18 pm

                • I don’t understand your logic on this subject. Leuchter and Rudolf are correct in their writing, while Nizkor is not correct on many points. If Leuchter and Rudolf were NOT correct I would be attacking them for being incorrect.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 28, 2016 @ 7:25 pm

                • I have no doubt you support Nizkor – bird of a feather and all – proliferation of ignorance and misinformation. Get enlightened!

                  Comment by Diane King — January 28, 2016 @ 5:11 pm

                • Oh, yeah.
                  Here it is:

                  http://www.nizkor.org/qar-complete.cgi
                  The funny thing about your website is that it mentions Norman Finkelstein. Again.
                  Finkelstein is not a Holocaust denier. His issue is the commercialization of the Holocaust.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 27, 2016 @ 8:34 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “Maybe you should write a script, Hermie. Call it: The Attack of the Zionists”

                  Would be plagiarism. Already written (and implemented) decades ago…

                  Comment by hermie — January 30, 2016 @ 7:43 am

            • Wow that’s a long list. Actually I don’t have any evidence relating to Herbert Z either way. For all I know he could have been a saint or a perpetrator. I guess we will all have to wait for the trial if it ever takes place.

              http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3239089/I-d-gladly-rope-bastard-s-neck-Auschwitz-victims-grandson-reveals-hatred-Nazi-guard-93-faces-charges-murder-170-000-Jews.html

              Comment by srebrenica — January 21, 2016 @ 9:04 am

        • Where is your proof that this man helped the Jews?
          Jeff

          Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 4:43 pm

          • First of all, where’s YOUR proof he wasn’t there to BE a medic to help the numerous laborers? The letter from Himmler, for example, concerned with maintaining the numbers in the camps for the labor. The war effort was paramount. Had to keep the workers healthy (even the brain-dead contortion of the truth of SCHINDLER’s LIST confirmed the presence and need of laborers).

            Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 6:52 pm

            • I don’t have any proof…either way.
              Here’s the kicker:
              There was, at any given point, a large number of SS personnel at Auschwitz, plus their families (7,000 SS served at Auschwitz while the camp was open). So this medic may have only served them, after all, he wasn’t there that long.
              Or he could have served the general population, including making selections at the ramp. Or, he made no selections.
              This is the great unknown. Serving at Auschwitz is not a presumption of a crime (even though it gets treated that way).
              This is why I object to these trials. After 70 years, what evidence exists?
              Plus, due to his age even if convicted he will never spend a day in prison.
              I’m actually on the denier side on this.
              Jeff the Chinese-Irish Jew

              Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 6:10 am

  24. Well, I have to say,
    WOW.
    You know, I walked away for a little while to drive home from work, plug my phone in, have dinner, spend some time with the family.
    I check back and I have to say, I haven’t had that much fun reading comments in awhile.
    Thanks, srebenica (sorry if I got that wrong) but I haven’t seen piss anyone piss Rizoli off since, well, I started replying to him.
    You made my evening, thank you.
    Nice to see another person who is for sanity.
    Jeff

    Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 6:23 pm

    • Great two peas on the same pod……LOL
      Same old s*** different day.

      Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 6:26 pm

      • Well, look at it this way, Jim.
        You’ve got a brand new person to bug about gas chambers.
        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 7:09 pm

        • Jeff…..ya lucky me.

          Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 7:28 pm

          • That’s me, Jim. The Irish Jew.
            I kinda like it. As a matter of fact, I think I’ll adopt it as my own, if you don’t mind. I’ll give you credit for it.
            Incidentally, about the open air cremations, I admit I was impressed by your explanation.
            http://hdot.org/en/learning/myth-fact.html
            See the above link.

            Jeff the Irish Jew (courtesy of Jim Rizoli, noted Holocaust denier)
            Sorry, Hermie, I know I told you I would sign Jeff the Jew but I actually like Jim’s idea better.

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 7:41 am

            • Jeff

              I read the link….again rehash of old crap. They give answers that can’t be proven. Nice anecdotal info for those who like to be led by the nose and can’t think for themselves. Where are the piles of wood, the coke, the dirt, the ashes, the 120 feet high mountains of clothes, the stories go on and on and on….senseless.
              Hard to believe an “intelligent” maybe…. person like you falls for this shit.
              I like this explanation for the Holocaust…..The Holocaust is true because it happened…..really now. WOW….I am now a believer…..
              People sure lie a lot to prove their point wouldn’t you say? And you and your dopeys don’t say a word against them.
              Why would these people lie?

              http://balder.org/judea/The-Most-Fantastic-Holocaust-Survivor-Stories-Jewish-Soap-Lampshades-Fertilizer-Mengele-Miracles.php

              JR

              Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 8:09 am

              • Please post the link that gives us all of the crazy stories about the Holocaust once more, Jim.
                Seriously, I think that’s the fourth or fifth time you’ve posted that link.
                I’ll tell you why I believe the history of the Holocaust as it exists in the main stream, Jim.
                It’s simple, really.
                It fits the narrative.
                In everything I’ve read it simply makes sense……more sense than trying to dream up some mystical conspiracy of Jews, Communists and capitalists.
                What, exactly, was the goal of this conspiracy? This is where it gets hazy for me.
                From what I can figure, one of its primary goals was the creation of the state of Isreal. Ok. So, all of this trouble to create one small state in the Middle East? This massive forgery, all of the man hours needed to forge document after document, intimidate or persuade witnesses and torture perpetrators, get the various governments to agree to this and sign off, all for Isreal? And keep all of this secret? Sorry, I scream bullshit to high heaven. Conspiracies exist and sometimes succeed or fail but they have specific goals to accomplish. Once completed the conspiracy ends. The key to a successful conspiracy is keeping the numbers small and controlling specific events.
                An example of this is the attempt to topple Hitler in 1944. The number of conspirators was relatively small and aimed for a specific goal. It failed, but the climax was the attempt on Hitler, not dragging things on forever. 9-11 is another conspiracy that succeeded. It had a specific goal that it aimed for, not dragging it out forever.
                Another reason I’ve heard to fake the Holocaust was to put the blame on the Germans for WW II. Why? Germany invaded Poland, the USSR and declared war on the US. What else do you need?
                Of course I can’t forget the major contention is that there is some sort of vast, shadowy world of Jews, controlling events.
                Crazy.
                So, Jim, what I’ve decided is that looking over things is that Holocaust denial simply belongs in that hazy world of conspiracy theories that help the deluded get through their day.

                Jeff the Irish Jew

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 8:46 am

              • FG-regarding the invasion of Poland, even if what you say is true, Germany actually invaded August 26th.
                You see, the original invasion was set for August 26th. Hitler called it off after Poland, Britain and France signed their assistance treaty on the 25th because he wanted more time to try and break up this alliance. However, not all of the German units received this message and crossed over the border. One unit got involved in a fire fight and captured some Polish soldiers while losing one of their own. This unit returned a day or two later after receiving word that the invasion was canceled.
                So, a border violation is a cause for war.

                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 11:36 am

                • Jeff wrote: “Hitler called it off after Poland, Britain and France signed their assistance treaty on the 25th because he wanted more time to try and break up this alliance.”

                  Hitler wanted more time to give peace another chance. That was the intent of his 16-point peace plan of August 30, 1939 (offering to have the inhabitants of the ‘Polish’ Korridor voting for their own future and settling the matter for the politicians of both sides, who were patently unable to reach a fair and satisfactory agreement by themselves). During the debates following WW1, British PM David Lloyd George had predicted that the next world war would begin in the Korridor, and the British military commitment of March 1939 toward Poland of course didn’t help to bring a peaceful way out and to appease the military junta at the head of the Polish state (the Polish ‘Colonels’ Regime’) in those days, on the contrary. It instantly stopped the current German-Polish negociations about that topic. Unsurprisingly. Peace was not the purpose of the British military commitment. Britain hadn’t built a world empire by letting small foreign nations headed by a military junta begin wars for herself. But Britain had built a world war partly by obliterating her rivals on any useful pretext with the help of other states. That was Britain’s secular European policy to secure a “balance of power” beneficial for UK. The sham concern for the survival of small nations was one of those useful pretexts for the obliteration of rival states. The trick had worked with the Belgian excuse during the previous world war. And it worked as well with the Polish excuse during WW2. After WW1, Churchill had candidly admitted that Britain’s involvement had been driven by the will to obliterate England’s German rival and so restore a “balance of power” beneficial for the British Empire. The same trick and goal was behind England’s policies toward Poland and germany from spring 1939. Don’t be gullible…

                  Comment by hermie — January 21, 2016 @ 6:41 am

                • edit: “Britain had built a world empire” instead of “Britain had built a world war”

                  Comment by hermie — January 30, 2016 @ 7:47 am

              • Additionally and this bears repeating – the stats of cremation. Based on the stats, there shouldn’t be a tree in existence in the whole of Europe – so if there is a tree or two, do you suppose this cremation story is … fabricated and if THAT is fabricated, maybe the whole holocost myth is…. well, a myth. Now for a few facts about cremations: Assuming medium-sized trees of 1 cord volume and 1,500 lbs., the total number of trees needed comes to roughly 515,000. There were two options for obtaining the required quantity of wood: either there was a large forested area near the camp where the demand for firewood could be met, and whence the wood would then be transported to the camp with suitable vehicles, or the wood had to be brought in from other areas by rail. Let us suppose for the moment that the wood supply was nearby. Assuming that a 15-ton truck can make 3 runs daily, allowing for loading and unloading of the truck, then 126 trips would need to be made daily, using some 42 trucks. None of the eyewitness statements indicate the presence of such a fleet of trucks. The same goes for the labor force required for the daily felling, limbing, sawing and splitting as well as loading and unloading of 2,800 trees. If, given the primitive conditions that prevailed, we assume that two man could have processed – that is, felled, limbed, sawed and split – one tree per day (an utter illusion), then the lumberjacks would clearly have had to number at least 5,600. To give an idea of how large a forest would need to be in order to supply such vast quantities of wood, let us assume a yield of 325 cord per acre, which for 515,000 trees would require a forest of 1,590 acres, or just short of 2.5 square miles. To put it more graphically, such a forest would have been 2.5 miles long and 1 mile wide. Is it really conceivable that the witnesses and the local residents could have failed to notice such a large deforested area? The site would still be apparent today. If one proceeds instead on the assumption that the quantity of wood needed would not have been available locally, then it would have had to be brought in from elsewhere, for example in the form of large fire logs, in rail wagons. If one performs the corresponding calculations for this scenario, then a freight train of 63 cars of 30 metric tons each would have had to be unloaded in the camp every day – a total of 185 freight trains. In the end the total length of the trains would have reached 116 km, or 72 miles. This begs the question: where are the pertinent Reichsbahn (German Railway) documents about these enormous wood transports? The authorities and offices in question would hardly have dispensed with payment and not submitted their accounts. Regarding the claim that the 875,000 corpses were eliminated completely with out any trace, we must consider the quantities of ashes that remain. The quantities of wood ashes are considerable, and vary with the type of wood. We shall postulate the low value of 6.6 lbs. per ton of dry wood.112 The wood ashes remaining would then have weighed approximately 1,000 metric tons; the equivalent of the payload of 100 10-ton trucks. The ash content of a human body makes up about 5.6% of the body’s weight;114 given a 132 lb. body, this comes to 7.3 lbs. The ashes from the 875,000 burned bodies would thus have weighed 6,387,500 lbs. The total quantity of ashes – wood ashes plus human ashes – would therefore have weighed almost 4,000 metric tons, or 8.6 million pounds, all of which (according to the witnesses) were then mixed with the soil and thrown back into the pits.115 Even if this quantity of ash had been mixed with the roughly 3.53 million cubic feet of soil excavated from the burial pits, it would be easy to find evidence for human remains of the quantity alleged by the witnesses.

                Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 3:32 pm

                • The Holohuxsters response……magic…LOL

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 3:36 pm

                • Actually this doesn’t bear repeating – see previous post – actually if you are such an expert on mass burning of bodies maybe I should contact your local FBI office

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 4:20 pm

                • Bored, Diane.
                  I’ve already posted a link that refutes your argument.
                  Jeff the Chinese-Irish Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 5:53 pm

            • I went to the website in the link that your provided. At first, I thought that this website was intended as a joke.

              For example:

              “RESPONSE: However, extensive evidence of the gas chambers in Auschwitz-Birkenau remains. Cremas 2 and 3 had holes in the roof for the introduction of Zyklon-B into the gas chamber below. Eyewitness and photographic evidence documents these holes, and a recent study has proved their precise location.”

              I have been to Auschwitz-Birkenau twice and stayed there for several days on my second trip. I did not see the alleged holes in the roof of Krema 2. I saw only one hole, which was the hole through which both Fred Leuchter and Germar Rudold climbed down into the alleged gas chamber. This is a large hole, not a hole suitable for pouring Zyclon-B into the so-called gas chamber.

              This is another quote from the website:

              “RESPONSE: Despite the fact that the wire-mesh introduction columns can’t be found today, their existence is confirmed by eyewitness accounts-both perpetrator and survivor-and by a surviving German documents that lists them in an inventory.”

              The statement above is totally ridiculous.

              I will say that the website has a nice layout, which makes it seem credible. But I would advise Fred Leuchter and Germar Rudolf to never look at this website because they might die laughing.

              Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 8:34 am

              • Then, by all means, direct them to the website.
                Jeff the Irish Jew

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 8:48 am

    • Thanks Jeff – I couldn’t stand by any longer and let you have all the fun😉

      Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 9:45 am

      • It’s interesting that you’ve been here before and never commented. I came across this site last Summer.
        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 9:59 am

        • For our HoloHucksters on this site who believe the HoloLie
          The question is why would the main military people who testified for the Holohoax do so…..
          Here is some good info that explains why…
          http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p167_Weberb.html

          Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 10:56 am

          • The answer is that the people, who testified for the Holohoax, had been tortured. Thanks for putting up this link which explains what happened. There are some newbs, who are following my blog, and they don’t know the true facts.

            Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 11:03 am

            • FG
              Glad I could help. These people these Holocaust hoaxsters on this site have no clue what happened during the war to the Germans and why everything turned out the way it did. Once they understand the emotional torture that went on here maybe they could have some empathy for the Germans and what happened to them.
              When I presented with that link should be enough to get anyone to see that the Holocaust is a big Hoax and what we deniers have been saying is the truth but I still think this will not be enough to convince them because these people are just plain evil or increfibly stupid. It takes a very humble an honest man to admit they’re wrong and the guys on this site just don’t have it in them I don’t think.
              Hopefully we can reach some of them.

              Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 11:50 am

              • In America, we now have something called “common core”. I wrote about common core on this blog post: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2014/05/10/critical-thinking-assignment-started-with-the-study-of-the-diary-of-anne-frank/

                Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 12:08 pm

              • Actually, Jim, I have a great deal of empathy for the German people.
                The facts are:
                Soviet troops raped millions of German women during their invasion of Prussia and Germany proper.
                The Western allies also committed rape, though not on the scale of the Red Army.
                The allied bombing campaign destroyed millions of homes, factories, farms, etc. while up to 600,000 civilians died.
                German POWs were treated terribly by both the West and Soviets, with many millions deployed for forced labor. Up to one million German POWs may have died in the Soviet Union. The Soviets did not release their last German prisoners until 1955. For the West, the French were particularly brutal, forcing German POWs to clear minefields, killing many. It is also true that US POW camps were initially very brutal places, with a severe lack of food, water and shelter.
                The Soviets acted like locusts, pillaging factories, businesses, etc. and shipping them to the USSR.
                Finally, ethnic German families, many of whom lived in the Baltics, Poland, Czechoslovakia, etc.
                for centuries were forced out of their ancestral homes. Many died.
                So, I’m well aware of what happened to the Germans after the war, Jim.
                I also understand what Germans did during the war. I empathize with German victims as well.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 12:11 pm

            • Some were undoubtedly tortured during the 40’s, and as Jeff said, it must have been so terrible for them to have the tables turned on them. Poor Pohl having two of his teeth knocked out – the man who oversaw the concentration camp system, and gave his ‘doctor’ friend Heissmayer a barracks in Neuengamme to experiment on children. My heart bleeds for him.

              The main trials of war criminals connected with the camps went on into the 80’s (Majdanek finished in ’81). I really think it is a stretch on the imagination (even Jim’s) to suggest that the West Germans tortured the defendants into their admissions in court. The problem with the West German trials were the light sentences handed out to those convicted. The Red Army Faction (Baader Meinhof) was formed in 1970 partly as a response to the failure of denazification in West Germany in the preceding decades.

              We aren’t all newbs on here FG – my interest started over 30 years ago after listening to the drunken rants of a friend’s Latvian father about shooting Jews when he was in the Latvian SS. I remember he was fond of showing us his Iron Cross and telling us what a wonderful time he had in the war. Unfortunately the b*****d was never prosecuted and died peacefully. Like Jeff I have read a lot of denier literature – ‘true facts’ they are not IMHO.

              Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 1:04 pm

              • That’s interesting, about your friends father.
                There is a gentleman by the name of Stolpman who answers here. He lived through it as a German.
                He mentioned uncles of his who served on the Eastern Front who heard about the mass shootings and were deeply disturbed by it.
                Your story and his absolutely confirms the reality of the Holocaust because it is on a personal level, not abstract words in a book.
                From what I’ve read, the Latvians were extremely enthusiastic about shooting Jews. Frankly, local collaborators made it worse because they knew the local Jews, knew where they could hide and knew the locality.
                Thank you for sharing that.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 1:31 pm

              • The Nuremberg trials were a farce. According to Benton Bradberry, THE MYTH OF GERMAN VILLAINY in his preface: “The anti-German propaganda has cultivated the general feeling that they got what they deserved. The entire responsibility for starting both wars and for all the death and destruction resulting from them has been assigned to the Germans (though the facts don’t bear that out). Because they were the losers of both World Wars, they were never permitted to present their case before the world court, nor to tell their side of the story through any medium. The winners of wars, after all, write the history books. Neither did the true story of what happened during the war come out in the Nuremberg Trials. The Nuremberg Trials were nothing more than Soviet style show trials which violated every standard of traditional British and American justice. Their purpose was not to discover guilt or innocence, but to spread a legal gloss over a decision which had already been made to execute Germany’s leaders. The entire Nuremberg circus was a sham and a travesty. The anti-German propaganda, used to create the climate of hatred that made the massive destruction and the mass slaughter of German civilians possible, continued relentlessly long after the war was over when it would seem natural for sober minded historians to begin to moderate their extreme views about Germany. The fantastic atrocity stories continue even today. One needs only to tune in to the History Channel to see them repeated again and again. In contrast, World War I was not long over before the atrocity stories attributed to the Germans during that war were exposed as the deliberate lies they were. Responsible men conducted thorough investigations and found that none of it was true. All the lurid stories were deliberately fabricated to win British public support for the war against Germany and also to bring America into the war. But a different factor was in play after World War II to keep the phony horror stories alive which did not exist after World War I. After WWII, the Jews exploited the anti-German world sentiment, which they themselves had largely created with their propaganda, to justify the creation of their long sought after state of Israel as a homeland for the Jewish people. Through manipulation of the international information media, the Jews won worldwide sympathy for themselves with their sensational stories of unique Jewish suffering at the hands of the cruel Germans. They claimed that Germany had followed a systematic plan to exterminate all of Europe’s Jews and that by war’s end had managed to kill 6 million of them. The alleged method was to round the Jews up from all over Europe, haul them in trains to so-called “death camps”where they were herded into gas chambers and killed, and their bodies then burned in giant crematoria, with, conveniently, no forensic evidence of what had happened left behind. In the absence of forensic evidence, eye witness testimony, no matter how bazaar, sufficed to convict Germany and to make her the pariah of civilized nations. The judges at the Nuremberg Trials were themselves not immune to the torrents of anti-German hate propaganda, and were already predisposed before the trials ever began to believe any horror story, no matter how fantastic, about the Germans. Another factor which preordained the outcome of the trials was that the accusers also served as investigators, prosecutors and final judges. The trials were also permeated throughout with an atmosphere of Jewish vengeance seeking. Just behind the Gentile front men, most of the lawyers, prosecutors, and investigators were Jews. Hundreds of Jews who could barely speak English disported themselves in American Army officer uniforms. Two of the eight Nuremberg judges were Jews, Robert Falco of France, and Lt. Col. A.F. Volchkov (real name Berkman) of the Soviet Union. The General Prosecutor for the “High Court”was Dr. Jakob Meistner, a Jew. Their dominance and control of the trials was blatant. Even the hangman for the 10 Nazi leaders sentenced to death, Master Sergeant John C. Woods, was a Jew, and the hangings took place on October 16, 1946, the Jewish holiday of “Purim.”In the Book of Esther, the 10 sons of Haman, an enemy of the Jews, were hanged on Purim day. According to Louis Marschalko, a wartime Hungarian journalist who wrote about the trials: “Out of 3,000 people employed on the staff at the Nuremberg Courts, 2,400 were Jews.”The Holocaust story that we all know so well today was developed during the Nuremberg Trials.”

                Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 3:35 pm

                • Diane – suggest you read the transcripts of the IMT rather than post bullshit. It will take you a long time to read them and I very much doubt you will do it – let me suggest you read the Kaltenbrunner parts both prosecution and defence – would you like me to post you the links lol?

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 3:47 pm

                • Not guilty at Nuremberg good read….
                  But hey, why would the two Knuckleheads
                  Want to learn the Truth

                  http://www.cwporter.com/innocent.htm

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 3:51 pm

                • Jim, I’ve asked you to stop recommending books. I’ve read two of them and that’s time I’ll never get back.
                  Jeff the Chinese-Irish Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 5:50 pm

                • I wrote about the testimony of Ernst Kaltenbrunner on this blog post: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2012/08/11/the-testimony-of-dr-ernst-kaltenbrunner-at-the-nuremberg-imt/

                  On that blog post, I put a video of his testimony. I was very impressed with his testimony on the witness stand.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 5:40 pm

                • Thank you, most appreciated. He replaced Reinhard Heydrich (regrettably). I’ve heard the testimony is quite remarkable!

                  Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 7:06 pm

                • Rizoli – have you actually read the transcripts?

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 3:56 pm

                • Odd, Robert Falco, the Jew, recommended leniency towards many of the defendants and repeatedly tried to stop the death penalty from being pronounced.
                  Doesn’t sound like a vengeful Jew to me.
                  The rest of it is standard denier drech.
                  Jeff the Irish Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 5:27 pm

          • Naturally IHR is an unbiased website (stifling a laugh).
            Oh, I don’t doubt that some of the defendants were tortured, threatened with deportation, that sort of thing.
            It must suck to be on the business end of a pair of pliers after wielding them for all of those years. But, I digress.
            The IMT used tons of documents to convict, including the Eisatzgruppen Reports, Frank’s own diary and the speeches of Nazi party leaders.
            So it wasn’t all about eyewitness or perpetrator testimony. Sorry, Jim.
            Jeff the Irish Jew

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 11:54 am

        • You have been doing a great job for months, but Rizoli has been starting to get on my tits lately. Wolf tries to help but I sometimes feel he’s wasting his time here – most people here are not interested in survivor testimony and frankly the abuse he gets is disgusting. Rizoli has no ability to articulate anything approaching a reasoned argument, and FG has of course been backing him and Rucker up. Since this site gets a lot of hits from people researching the Holocaust I thought its time to stop watching the crap on here and get involved – kudos to you for putting up with it for so long

          Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 3:44 pm

          • Yes, I agree that Wolf gets ill-treated here.
            We have no concept of what he went through as a child. I also understand that what happened to his father was very painful for him.
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 5:48 pm

          • Good grief! Don’t EVEN pretend you are even handed supporting the mainstream holocost myth merchants. You refuse to read the books Jim suggests, the materials and then counter by demanding facts and information – which if presented you’d not recognize if it bit you in the arse. srebrenica – yep, you’re right, “… stop watching the crap on here….” We who oppose the lies of the holohoax are essentially MYTH busters. But thanks to your new turn of phrase, FurtherGlory, Hermie, Jim, I, to name a few are CRAP (not as nice sounding as ‘myth busters’, but it works) BUSTERS. Thanks for that.

            It’s a known fact that many if not most of the Nuremberg defendants were tortured and threatened, and yes, Jim has read some of the transcripts. But in a soviet-style and directed trial, what difference would that make. They don’t have the required disclaimer … “Testimony was acquired through severe torture and must not be considered serious evidence.” At least that would be honest. Mark Weber and many other revisionists in and out of IHR have read the transcripts IN GERMAN and written about their findings as well. But frankly, by golly, facts don’t rise and fall from those who support the myth like yourselves. You are NOT the final word. I thought this was a discussion but apparently it is only valid if we support the lies of the holohoaxters, ad nauseum. The truth might, however, stand on its merit from the MYTH (Crap) Busters. That’s where I’d put my money, if I were a betting person.

            Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 6:02 pm

  25. Justice has not been given to the many victims of ” Lord ” Janner the former head and founder of the UK based Holocaust Educational Trust. He recently died before coming to trial but today a report is released that indicates he should have been prosecuted many years ago. Here is a report from the BBC , the state broadcaster in the UK .
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35352809

    Comment by peter — January 19, 2016 @ 7:59 am

    • The BBC report states that Director of Prosecutions, Alison Saunders, says:- “It is a matter of regret that on three occasions, there were opportunities to put the allegations against Lord Janner before a jury.”

      So he had friends in high places then! It is worth noting that he was a former deputy leader of the World Jewish Congress, and was a doughty champion of the holocaust industry and compensation for its victims. It will be interesting to see, therefore, if the WJC will be contributing generously to a fund that will compensate the victims of his disgusting crimes.

      Comment by Talbot — January 19, 2016 @ 8:46 am

      • Talbot I never thought I would agree with you (and actually regarding your views on the holocaust I don’t) but Nicholas Kollerstrom did pick some holes in the London bombings and full credit to him for this, particularly for getting the UK government to change its version of events in parliament – Can I suggest you do some research on Gladio? I don’t agree with his holocaust analysis btw

        Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 4:40 pm

        • Hi Srebrenica – we’ll have to agree to disagree on the holocaust I’m afraid, but its interesting that you bring up the name Nicholas Kollerstrom. I am a great admirer of his work in trying to expose these false-flag events and psy-ops. His website entitled ‘Terror on the Tube’ is a superb place to study the London Bombings of July 2005. I don’t know how far you agree with his analysis, but I am basically onside with Dr Kollerstrom’s view that it was a secret British Intelligence inside job, and the four Muslim guys were completely innocent, unknowing patsies.

          The available evidence produced at the 7/7 Inquest may suggest how the explosions on the three tube trains were actually done. I believe they were using a very up to date method of technology involving electromagnetic detonators, buried in the track bed, and these were able to launch kinetic energy projectiles, or KEP’s, upwards through the floors of the carriages. But if you want to find out more, then go to Dr Kollerstrom’s website and page up “Electric Detonations of the Trains”.

          I only know the basic details about Operation Gladio, and haven’t explored the subject in any depth. I understand that it was a loose, undercover, organisation run by Nato that was design to prevent communist/socialist governments from gaining power in countries like Italy and Belgium. But it seems to have attracted some very unsavoury types into its ranks, and degenerated into carrying out indiscriminate violence. Maybe I will look into Gladio a little deeper – Thank You.

          Comment by Talbot — January 20, 2016 @ 9:46 pm

          • This is an interesting read – Gladio – Nato’ Dagger at the Heart of Europe by Richard Cottrell. It’s very well sourced and he is an ex-European MP. It’s also cheap on Kindle🙂

            Comment by srebrenica — January 21, 2016 @ 7:53 am

  26. At Auschwitz and other Lagers that so called medic avoided to go to the battlefront to care wounded comrades. Noteworthy that when busy with the selection he too sent aged or disabled persons right to the Gas Chamber. While nowadays he faces only to be sent in a state nursing house. In USA you should rather care about the many victims – allmost all negroes – of the too easy shooting by police men.

    Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 18, 2016 @ 11:16 pm

    • Noteworthy that when busy with the selection he too sent aged or disabled persons right to the Gas Chamber.

      How do you know this? What is the proof that he made ‘selections’ and sent people to the gas chamber? The trial — such as it will be — has not taken place yet.

      Comment by eah — January 19, 2016 @ 12:29 am

      • EAH. That had been the routine in the selection. One who had been placed to do the selections had to follow this routine. No one can know how many inmates or new arrivals had been selected by each SS medic posted there who at any rate avoided to go to the battlefront. Are You a lawyer? Best,

        Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 19, 2016 @ 9:42 am

      • Wolf, I asked for specific proof about this man — “he”.

        What is the proof that he made ‘selections’ and sent people to the gas chamber?

        Comment by eah — January 19, 2016 @ 11:30 am

        • EAH. All medics at Auschwitz had to do selections which meant also send peoples to the Gas Chamers for gassing. As You will certainly follow the trial kindly let me know what that medic will say. Thanks in advance.

          Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 19, 2016 @ 1:04 pm

        • will certainly follow

          Wolf, I will not follow this trial, which I regard as a cruel, absurd farce perpetrated by the disgusting German state.

          All medics at Auschwitz had to do selections

          So what is the specific proof that ‘all medics’ — ie each and every one — had to do ‘selections’, and therefore knowingly condemned people to be gassed?

          Some of what you say makes no sense — in the past, you have claimed the Nazis were obsessed with secrecy — so much so that they would wait until a train left before doing a selection (which was also witnessed by all the Jews not selected of course) — now you say that each and every medic who ever worked at Auschwitz did selections — many of whom no doubt would survive the war (and did), and could therefore tell what went on at Auschwitz — that does not make sense to me.

          Comment by eah — January 19, 2016 @ 1:36 pm

          • I wrote about how selections were made at Auschwitz on my website at http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/History/Articles/Selection3.html

            I will have to update that page to show that it was the “medics” that made the selections. This is the first time that I have ever heard this, and I have been studying the Holocaust since 1997.

            Comment by furtherglory — January 19, 2016 @ 1:47 pm

          • There was no secrecy about Jews walking to the gas chamber at Auschwitz-Birkenau. I wrote about this at https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2011/08/06/walking-to-the-gas-chambers-at-auschwitz-birkenau/

            Comment by furtherglory — January 19, 2016 @ 1:54 pm

          • I did considerable research before writing about Auschwitz on my scrapbookpages.com website. I did not find anything about “medics” doing selections. On this page of my website, I wrote about how selectons were made: http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/History/Articles/Selection.html

            This page on my website was written before I became a Holocaust denier, so this is the kosher version of the Auschwitz story.

            Comment by furtherglory — January 19, 2016 @ 2:08 pm

            • FG….
              Glad to see that and all the research that you have done which is absolutely incredible you’ve come to the conclusion that the Holocaust is a hoax. So by doing good research you’ve actually come to see what the truth is and that is what we’re trying to do with other people. Slowly but surely people are finally seeing the truth but only if they do the research themselves.

              Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 2:14 pm

              • One more point, the buildings built could not facilitate or even support gassings of people – lice yes. Anyone who claims that gassings were done or seen or heard of is GROSSLY misinformed.

                Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 6:04 pm

    • Wolfe you know what bothers me about yuo…… you get on the sins of other people yert you forget the sins of the Jews. For instance yo say anything nothing about the sonderkommando who supposedly worked in the gas chambers inviting their own people into those gas chambers. So their sins are forgiven, Jews can kill Jews to save their lives but that’s okay but they were only following orders because they would be killed right. But its a different story when the German soldiers get hung at the Nuremberg trials for following their orders to. So on one hand you follows
      orders and have somebody killed I guess it’s okay but on another if a German follows orders and does the same thing then you make a big deal about it you’re pretty choosy about who you accused of war crimes. You Jews were cowards because you would do anything to save your skin you didn’t stand up like the Jehovah’s Witnesses did who were executed because they didn’t want to take part in anything but you would do anything to save yourselves and you did.

      Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 5:55 am

      • You are contradicting yourself, Jim.
        Why are you chiding Wolf about something that happened at the gas chambers you don’t believe in?
        The SS at the camps were volunteers, the Jews prisoners under duress.
        As far as I know, no SS man was ever executed for refusing to participate in the killing of the Jews. Oscar Gruening, for
        example, protested to his superior officer over the killing of the Jews at Auschwitz (his protest was over the manner of the killing, not the fact of the killing) and was never punished. Groening did apply for a transfer but this was denied.
        Certain Order Police members protested and refused to participate in the shooting of Jews. Their officers reassigned them to other duties and the men were not punished.
        What soldiers were executed at Nuremberg? I guess you can count Jodl and Keitel, they were generals.
        You can’t blame the Sondercommando, Jim. The SS forced them to participate under the threat of murder (which they frequently carried out).
        Not all of the Jehovah’s Witnesses remained strong. Some of them did submit and regretted it all of their lives. You also have to consider the sheer numbers involved. There were many more Jews than JW. Not all of the SK participated, some of those chosen committed suicide, some rebelled, others were murdered when they refused to do the SS dirty work.
        Read a book not written by a denier sometime, Jim. It might help open your eyes.

        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 8:09 am

        • Jeff

          Under HoloHoax Liars

          Actually here is a story for you…..Stephan Ross HoloHoax liar had some good stories, there was a video where he said he sat on a fellow Jew who was traveling in a cattle car with him and suffocated him….Isn’t that a nice thing to do to a fellow Jew? Had to save himself right? Who cares if he had to “willfully” kill a fellow comrade.
          So what was that about the Jews being the recipients of “hate”. I guess only the Germans did things like that.
          Stephen Ross said he was so starved he gnawed on dead Jews in the Death Camps. Yet good old starving Cannibal Stephan survived 10 Death Camps, hid in shit, and takes figurines made out of human bones with him when he tortures school children with his absurd stories.

          Stephan also shows school kids his shit/soup bowl.

          More on this scoundrel….

          http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/DachauLiberation/StephanRoss.html

          Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 9:49 am

          • Why are you increasing the number of Death Camps, Jim? There were six:
            Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka, Birkenau and Majdanek.
            Granted, the German Concentration Camps were not nice places to hang out at and many people died while incarcerated in them.
            I’ve never heard of Stephen Ross but then I don’t obsess over Holocaust survivors the way you do. As I’ve stated, I’ve never read Eli Weisel or read Anne Frank’s Diary.
            BTW, what IS (my homage to Jett Rucker) the denier obsession with Anne Frank’s Diary? To me it seems a little unhealthy to obsess over a diary written by a 14-year-old girl that died in 1945.
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 10:10 am

            • You wrote:
              “As I’ve stated, I’ve never read Eli Weisel or read Anne Frank’s Diary.”

              “BTW, what IS (my homage to Jett Rucker) the denier obsession with Anne Frank’s Diary? To me it seems a little unhealthy to obsess over a diary written by a 14-year-old girl that died in 1945.”

              In your comments, you have revealed, many times, that you are highly educated and very well-read. Yet there are serious gaps in your education. What kind of a person has never read Eli Wiesel, nor Anne Frank? You can’t even spell Wiesel!!! Shame on you!

              Anne Frank’s book is read the world over because of the quality of her writing, which is remarkable for such a young girl. Clearly, she was a child prodigy. I blogged about this at https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2010/02/19/the-dairy-of-anne-frank-is-it-authentic/

              Comment by furtherglory — January 19, 2016 @ 10:28 am

              • As far as Eli Wiesel, based upon what I’ve read about him on this blog and at other places, I believe he is a fraud. The most telling piece of evidence regarding this is his lack of a tattoo. I can’t rule out the possibility that he simply was not tattooed upon entering the camp. But, based upon what Wolf says, that all of the Auschwitz survivors he met were tattooed, the evidence points to Wiesel as a fraud. So, I definitely will not be reading any of his books.
                However, regarding Anne Frank, your praise of her writing style makes me interested in reading her diary. I’ll see if I can track down a copy when I get a chance.
                Frankly, I am not interested in Holocaust Survivor memoirs. I really don’t trust personal accounts written 20, 30, 40 or 50 years after the fact. I don’t mind reading testimonies included in the histories I read but that’s about it. I am reading Ian Kershaw’s first volume on Hitler, called Hitler: Hubris which covers his early life until 1936. I read the second volume last year that covers his life from 1936-1945. I’ve also read some good books on Stalin.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 11:10 am

              • I read your previous post on Anne Frank.
                I don’t really understand Holocaust deniers who question the authenticity of the diary. I thought they would focus more on other aspects of the Holocaust.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 11:18 am

          • Again, Jim, why the obsession with Anne Frank’s Diary?
            Do you deny that Anne Frank existed?
            If she did exist, why wouldn’t she write a diary?
            If her diary was interesting, why wouldn’t her father share it? I’m sure in some way it assuaged his grief over his daughter’s death by giving it some sort of meaning.
            Again, this part of denier mythology makes the least amount of sense……moaning on and on about a girl’s diary.
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 12:25 pm

            • Jeff……

              in regards to Anne Frank’s diary I think there are other issues with it. I think the main problem is that she’s become the poster girl for the Holo hoax story which I feel is a problem because they make it look like she was exterminated when she really just died of natural causes that she developed in the camp. So for the fact that the story goes on and on movies have been made on his books have been written about it and people actually develop more and more of a hoax story that’s where my problem is. However I don’t have a problem with her writing that diary but I think that there’s a lot of things that have to be answered to explain more about what really happened with the writing of it. I just hate to see a story used to for propaganda purposes.
              Her story paints a picture that didn’t exist or was not accurately portrayed in real life.

              Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 2:09 pm

              • Anne Frank could have come to America and escaped the Holocaust, but her father was a convicted criminal who had been cheating his bank customers; that is why he was denied entry into the USA. I wrote about this on this blog post: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2015/11/25/anne-franks-family-in-amsterdam-was-denied-entry-into-the-usa/

                Comment by furtherglory — January 19, 2016 @ 2:28 pm

                • So where exactly does it state that Otto Frank was convicted of bank fraud?

                  Quote ‘So why did Otto Frank leave Germany in 1933 ? We can find the answer in Carol Anne Lee’s thorough documented book The Hidden Life of Otto Frank. Because his brother Herbert (controlling interest) was arrested in April 1932 (before Hitler took power)for breaking the 1931 Regulation Governing the Trade in Securities with Foreign Countries Act. He was put on trial for fraud and the bank had to close down in 1933. Herbert refused to go to trial and Otto took his place. Otto left his family and went to start the pectine business in Holland with money sent to him by Jean Michel the architect. Otto’s main client was the german army when Hitler invaded. He hid so not to disclose that a jew (on trial for fraud)owned the business. Otto Frank had all opportunities to leave with his family and go to the USA. Money won.’

                  I look forward to your answer

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 19, 2016 @ 4:07 pm

              • In what way does the diary not show the truth?
                Anne Frank and her family hid from the Nazis. The Nazis found them, deported them across half a continent to Auschwitz. They survived that and a subsequent death march back to Germany. Anne and her sister succumbed to illness before liberation.
                Keep in mind, I only know the basics about Anne Frank, I’ve never read her diary (though at this point I feel like I should).
                What is false about anything I’ve written? Does it make you uncomfortable that the Nazis deported children to Auschwitz? Anne and her sister are lucky that they survived Auschwitz, some 7000 French Children did not.
                Does it make it personal for you, the story of Anne Frank? It’s easier to hate an abstract idea, the idea of the devilish Jew. That becomes harder when it’s a child, isn’t it, Jim? Anne, her mother and her sister
                only died because the Nazi government, the Nazis you admire so much, thought women and children a big enough threat to deport them to their deaths.
                There’s no way to know, of course. The Frank family may have died anyway in a bombing raid, caught in the cross fire, died of starvation or disease, etc. But, and here’s the important part, the Nazis decreased that chance of survival by deporting them.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 2:37 pm

          • I guess then that all these perpetrators were lying, and/or tortured:

            http://www.shamash.org/holocaust/denial/testimony.txt

            Jeff – please keep up the good work even though you, Wolf and Halli are wasting your lives with these anti-semites

            Comment by srebrenica — January 19, 2016 @ 3:42 pm

            • Please show us proof that there was anyone that was executed in a homicidal gas chamber. Out of all the millions and millions of people you claim to have been killed that has to be one picture of somebody that was killed in a homicidal gas chamber. Second please show me a picture of a real life homicidal gas chamber that was used in the killing of any people that would be nice too. And again thank you for calling us anti-semites who do not agree with the Holohoax issue.

              When push comes to shove you cannot come against us with any true facts so what you have to do is attack us personally calling us all sorts of names. it’s not going to work here the facts of the facts and the Holohoax promoters cannot prove what they have to say and we are not going to allow you to get away with it here.

              Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 3:57 pm

              • Do you just cut and paste your comments? – I was hoping for a more intellectual answer but I guess this is just the stock Rizoli/King reply – did you actually take the time to read the sourced link – I doubt it very much – sources are actually documented facts – they may not fit to your perverted view of the world but still they are facts – I’ve watched your videos btw, wish I hadn’t wasted my life – suggest you read some of Jeff’s recommended books

                Comment by srebrenica — January 19, 2016 @ 4:14 pm

                • and I guess you are not anti-Semitic either lol so don’t go on about attacking you personally:

                  quote : Your survival was regretted because you Jews for the most part were evil an you got what you deserved.
                  Hitler treated you better than you deserved, and in the end you people lied about the whole experience.
                  Like I said before God will deal with you in the end, and justice will be served.
                  You have fooled the world for a long time but you haven’t fooled God

                  I’m an atheist btw and not Jewish before you start on that topic

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 19, 2016 @ 4:28 pm

                • Did you actually read the link you put up. I read most of the accounts the lies and fabrications and the impossibilities of what they said. You just take them for face value without questioning whether the things they said could even happen. Most of the soldiers and most of the eyewitnesses didn’t see anything if they were cross examined in a court of law they would be shown to be wrong. The Nuremberg trials were a perfect example of that because the fact that the majority of the people that were killed they were killed because of lies that were said that weren’t even proven. When you do some homework maybe we can have an intelligent discussion because as it is now you would just cutting and pasting what has been said in most of what you have pasted and cut it has been proven wrong by the facts.
                  Are you ready to take us on fact by fact or you just going to walk away with your tail between your legs because you can’t back up anything you say?

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 4:52 pm

                • I read through the link you provided, I noticed some of the testimony is from “The Good Old Days.” I’m looking forward to reading it, I now have a copy.
                  Jeff K.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 8:55 pm

              • lol I don’t have my tail between my legs – most of the testimonies on the link are from outside the IMT trials – do you deny they are correct or do you think they were tortured into making these confessions? I think they were very direct in stating what they had seen and done. I don’t need to do any homework btw – these are people who willingly confessed to what they did, or saw. If you think they are incorrect then refute each one’s testimony and provide some facts against what they said. I’m very sure you can’t. sHow do you explain Groening’s testimony or Perry Broad. I doubt that you can – these were people who were there. Read about Petras Zelionka (Their Darkest Hour – Lawrence Rees). So to answer your question yes i’ll take you on fact for fact – balls in your court to deny what I posted – good luck lol

                Comment by srebrenica — January 19, 2016 @ 5:13 pm

                • I don’t think I mentioned any of these tall stories – stick to the challenge Mr Rizoli – perpetrator confessions – please don’t do what you deniers usually do – refute what they said with facts not bullshit

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 19, 2016 @ 5:23 pm

                • in case you need some help, here is the definition for refute:

                  prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 19, 2016 @ 5:34 pm

                • srebrenica

                  I’ve been in this race too long and won’t waste my time here with a maverick like you. I Have to many other things to do.
                  I put together a lot of info about the Holocaust on my website check it out if you will like.
                  CCFIILE.COM

                  When you at least make an attempt to read what I put together get back to me to show me where I’m wrong.
                  I WILL not debate a newcomer here unless they put the time in. Especially a cut and paste man who has not done any deep research.
                  I’ve done hundreds of videos on the topic what have you done?
                  Then you come along here thinking that we haven’t already heard what you have to say? LOL
                  You’re old news and everything you say has been thoroughly refuted and laughed at.

                  Here is a good start for you….
                  http://ccfiile.com/Holocaust_Liars.html

                  Again don’t waste my time unless you put in the time…..
                  One point to start with…..I did read your link and after the first paragraphs said enough was enough….Typical old news……
                  The first “witness” in your link to me Eril Fuchs …said people were gassed with “benzine” gas…..
                  Hate to break it to you the other liars say diesel….LOL You can’t quickly kill people with Diesel gas…..
                  So right off the bat the liars conflict with the stories and it only gets worse..

                  Here is some good research for you about the cremations and Treblinka…… long but a keeper….please refute it.
                  Cremations and why what the liars say is IMPOSSIBLE…..If you want to believe in the HoloHoax you better make sure it scientifically is possible.
                  We Deniers don’t believe in Holohoax miracles…..

                  The same goes for Sobibor…..
                  Hold on to your hat….
                  According to a November 27, 1986, report of the New Delhi Schenectady Gazette, cremations and the consumption of wood involved therein (due to the lack of corpses that will burn by themselves) are a serious concern for the inhabitants of India, since entire forests have been cut down over time for just this purpose. According to this report, the daily incineration of 21,000 bodies requires 6,433 metric tons of wood, i.e., 675 lbs. per body. In applying these conditions to Treblinka, we shall simplify the matter somewhat by ignoring the problems involved in the prior exhumation of the bodies; let it suffice to consider only one unreality, namely the incineration of the bodies. To forestall objections of any kind, we shall reduce the consumption of wood for mass cremations from 675 lbs. to 440 lbs. per body.110 From various eyewitness accounts it follows that the cremation process lasted until early August, a total of about 185 days. This means that a minimum of 4,700 bodies had to be cremated every day, requiring 950 metric tons of dry wood daily. The engineering handbook Hütte indicates a volume of 74.15 cu.ft. per metric ton for spruce wood,111 and of 109.5 cu.ft. per metric ton for spruce wood fire logs.112 This means that the volume of the wood needed in Treblinka daily for incinerating the corpses would have been about 104,000 cu.ft. This volume is perhaps easier to grasp when visualized as a stack 3 ft. high, 3 ft. wide and about 1.75 miles long. Every day! The cremation gratings, described by Warszawski as measuring 13 ft. × 33 ft. and with 1.5 ft. elevation above the ground, had a spatial volume of approximately 650 cu.ft. underneath the grating. To ensure that the firewood would receive enough draft (oxygen), a maximum of 530 cu.ft. could have been placed underneath. This quantity corresponds to a net weight of 10,600 lbs. and would have sufficed for cremating 24 (twenty-four!) bodies. If one assumes that, in this case, the complete incineration of the bodies took only 2 hours (which, however, is far too short to be realistic), then even cremating ‘round-the-clock’ would have disposed of 288 bodies at most. The high piling-up of bodies on the grating, as it is described by witnesses, would have brought nothing but disadvantages, if only due to the inhibited access granted the flames. But if 4,700 bodies had to be burned every day, this would have required more than 16 gratings as described above, with a total surface area of 6,890 sq.ft. Stoking the cremation sites with wood, and removing the ashes and skeletons, are elements which have been ignored to date.

                  Given the heat of the fire under the gratings and the stench of the burning bodies, it would have been impossible to perform these necessary tasks while the fire was burning. It is thus safe to say that continuous cremation in the manner described, and using the burning sites described by the witnesses, would not have been possible. Burning the 4,700 bodies would have required at least twice the number of gratings. With reference to the number of bodies to be incinerated, we still need to examine the source, processing and transportation of the needed quantities of firewood. The total cremation process in Treblinka would have required 430 million pounds, or 195,000 metric tons, of air-dried (seasoned) wood. Due to the short notice and brief time that Himmler allegedly allotted for this process, such a large quantity of air-dried wood would certainly have been impossible to get, which is why only fresh (“green”) wood of lower calorific value would have been available. The calorific value of seasoned wood is 3,600 kcal/kg, whereas that of green wood is only 2,000 kcal/kg.113 Therefore the total required quantity of wood would have increased to 351,000 metric tons, and the daily requirement of green wood was thus approximately 1,900 metric tons. Assuming medium-sized trees of 1 cord volume and 1,500 lbs., the total number of trees needed comes to roughly 515,000. There were two options for obtaining the required quantity of wood: either there was a large forested area near the camp where the demand for firewood could be met, and whence the wood would then be transported to the camp with suitable vehicles, or the wood had to be brought in from other areas by rail. Let us suppose for the moment that the wood supply was nearby. Assuming that a 15-ton truck can make 3 runs daily, allowing for loading and unloading of the truck, then 126 trips would need to be made daily, using some 42 trucks. None of the eyewitness statements indicate the presence of such a fleet of trucks. The same goes for the labor force required for the daily felling, limbing, sawing and splitting as well as loading and unloading of 2,800 trees.

                  If, given the primitive conditions that prevailed, we assume that two man could have processed – that is, felled, limbed, sawed and split – one tree per day (an utter illusion), then the lumberjacks would clearly have had to number at least 5,600. To give an idea of how large a forest would need to be in order to supply such vast quantities of wood, let us assume a yield of 325 cord per acre, which for 515,000 trees would require a forest of 1,590 acres, or just short of 2.5 square miles. To put it more graphically, such a forest would have been 2.5 miles long and 1 mile wide. Is it really conceivable that the witnesses and the local residents could have failed to notice such a large deforested area? The site would still be apparent today. If one proceeds instead on the assumption that the quantity of wood needed would not have been available locally, then it would have had to be brought in from elsewhere, for example in the form of large fire logs, in rail wagons. If one performs the corresponding calculations for this scenario, then a freight train of 63 cars of 30 metric tons each would have had to be unloaded in the camp every day – a total of 185 freight trains. In the end the total length of the trains would have reached 116 km, or 72 miles. This begs the question: where are the pertinent Reichsbahn (German Railway) documents about these enormous wood transports? The authorities and offices in question would hardly have dispensed with payment and not submitted their accounts. Regarding the claim that the 875,000 corpses were eliminated completely with out any trace, we must consider the quantities of ashes that remain. The quantities of wood ashes are considerable, and vary with the type of wood. We shall postulate the low value of 6.6 lbs. per ton of dry wood.112 The wood ashes remaining would then have weighed approximately 1,000 metric tons; the equivalent of the payload of 100 10-ton trucks. The ash content of a human body makes up about 5.6% of the body’s weight;114 given a 132 lb. body, this comes to 7.3 lbs. The ashes from the 875,000 burned bodies would thus have weighed 6,387,500 lbs. The total quantity of ashes – wood ashes plus human ashes – would therefore have weighed almost 4,000 metric tons, or 8.6 million pounds, all of which (according to the witnesses) were then mixed with the soil and thrown back into the pits.115 Even if this quantity of ash had been mixed with the roughly 3.53 million cubic feet of soil excavated from the burial pits, it would be easy to find evidence for human remains of the quantity alleged by the witnesses.

                  It must also be noted that in the incineration of corpses under the conditions specified by the witnesses, the bones would not have turned to ash, but would have remained as bones. The witnesses have described how the skeletal remains of the corpses were broken up, and screened and sifted over and over again to ensure that no evidence would remain. Given the primitive equipment described by the witnesses – wooden rollers and thin sheets of metal for crushing the bones – it might have been possible for a man to break up and sift two skeletons per hour in the manner specified. Thus, if one Jewish laborer had pulverized 20 skeletons per day, 240 Jewish laborers would have been needed for this task alone. Adding up the required personnel – 5,600 Jewish laborers for obtaining the wood, 240 for pulverizing the bones, and 150 to stoke the fire sites – fully 6,000 Jewish workers were needed to complete all the required tasks in a solid seven-day work week. Additionally, further hundreds of Jewish workers would have been needed to carry out various other tasks reported by witnesses: excavating and filling trenches, camouflage activities, sorting the valuables of the murdered Jews, cutting the hair and extracting the gold teeth of the victims, rendering services to the SS, administration, rations and supplies for the camp, etc. There would also have to have been reserve labor standing by at all times. Thus the camp would have had to have a permanent workforce of at least 8,000. This number stands in glaring contrast to the mere 700 Jewish laborers attested to for Treblinka.116 And finally, we must note that the teeth of the supposed victims could not have been destroyed by the primitive methods attested to.117 Even if each of the alleged victims had only 20 of the usual 32 teeth left at the time he or she died, there would have been at least 17.5 million teeth to be disposed of at Treblinka. This means that we should still be able to find some 5 teeth per cubic foot of the 3.53 million cu.ft. of material excavated at the alleged site of the crime. All these calculations are based on the number of victims (875,000) specified by the Jerusalem court. If, on the other hand, one were to postulate the 3 million Treblinka victims alleged by Grossmann and others, then the data ascertained in the previous must be multiplied by a factor of 3.5, meaning: 6,650 metric tons of wood daily to cremate the corpses; a total of approximately 1,200,000 tons of firewood, i.e., almost two million trees, for whose transport trains totaling about 252 miles would have been required. The area of the forest thus required amounts to 9 square miles. There would have been roughly 13,700 tons of ashes to hide, containing at least 60 million teeth. And where on earth were the 20,000 Jewish laborers needed to do all the work involved?

                  5. Summary To summarize the most important points of the previous:

                  1. Eyewitness testimony regarding the location, dimensions and internal structure of the supposed extermination camp Treblinka are utterly inconsistent and contradictory, and virtually impossible to reconcile with actual facts.
                  2. The alleged killing methods reveal an outlandish imagination. For this reason all the alleged killing methods other than the Diesel technique have generally been consigned to the Memory Hole.
                  3. However, Diesel exhaust gas is not suited to mass murder of human beings.
                  4. The introduction of exhaust gas from heavy Diesel engines into a hermetically sealed, brick walled room results in the destruction of the facility in question. The same goes for the removal of the air from such rooms.
                  5. Given the size of the rooms and the great numbers of victims hermetically locked up in them, as described by the witnesses, death by asphyxiation would have occurred within a relatively short time.
                  6. The burial pits and cremation sites described would have covered an area far greater than the entire so-called death camp.
                  7. Empirical knowledge as well as the laws of physics prove that corpses cannot burn by themselves.
                  8. The quantity of wood required for cremation of the victims would have been so great that there would most definitely be Reichsbahn papers documenting the transports, but no such papers have been found to date. There is also no evidence for the deforestation of large forested areas in the vicinity of Treblinka.
                  9. The witnesses make no mention of large quantities of fuel or of their transportation to the camp and the cremation sites.
                  10. Pulverizing more than 6.6 million pounds of bones with wooden rollers, sheets of metal, and sieves is not a method suitable for the elimination of evidence for human body parts.
                  11. The umpteen million teeth cannot be destroyed at all in this manner.
                  12. A minimum of 3,200 Jewish laborers would have been needed to manage all the work involved in the alleged elimination-without-a-trace of the bodies of the Treblinka gassing victims.
                  13. The existence of these great quantities of ashes and bones and the millions of teeth could still be conclusively proven even today.
                  14. An investigation that was ordered by a Polish court and included excavations in Treblinka yielded no proof for the claims of the witnesses. No large mass graves, no human ashes, and no signs of large-scale disturbances of the soil as entailed in the creation of mass graves or burning pits were found.
                  15. Analysis of German air photos as well as recent data gathered with ground penetrating radar has shown that no major disturbances of the natural ground structure occurred within Treblinka II or in its vicinity.
                  16. It is also proven that after the camp was dismantled the Germans had engaged in no camouflage activities – such as planting lupine or trees, as witnesses have claimed.
                  17. According to the December 2, 1941, edition of the official Amtlicher Anzeiger of the German occupation forces, Treblinka was to become a labor camp. One might be surprised that the German occupation powers would officially announce the setting-up of the camp, but there simply was not anything secret about labor camps.

                  The Malkinia camp was probably a transit camp for further transport to eastern settlements in Belarus and Ukraine. In conclusion, it should be stressed once again that disputing (‘denying’) the Holocaust is still a criminal offense in the Federal Republic of Germany. The ‘self-evident nature’ of the Treblinka Holocaust as proclaimed by the courts is based solely on eyewitness testimony. In light of the circumstances described here, it is not surprising that by now even the staff of the Holocaust Memorial Site at Jerusalem admit that the heart of the problem with the Treblinka camps is the eyewitness testimony.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 6:00 pm

                • You pointed out that there were many survivors of the concentration camps. I have often wondered why so many Holocaust survivors have lived to advanced age. There must have been something that caused their longevity. I personally think that one of the secrets of their survival was that turnips were one of the main foods in the camps. I think that turnips promote health; I try to eat lots of turnips, and it’s working. I am 82 and still healthy. I think that another reason that the prisoners survived, to advanced age, is that they didn’t eat a lot of meat in the camps. They ate lots of potatoes and bread, which was more healthy than eating lots of meat. They were pulling up dandelions and eating the leaves — nothing more healthy than that.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 19, 2016 @ 6:46 pm

                • Hotel Auschwitz…. Great place to be.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 6:53 pm

                • You mean Pery Broad, not Perry Broad. I mentioned him on my website.

                  Quote from my scrapbookpages.com website at http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/Tour/Auschwitz1/Auschwitz08A.html

                  “Filip Müller, the author of “Eye Witness, Three Years in the Gas Chambers,” wrote that there were six openings on the roof [of the Auschwitz gas chamber] and several SS men poured the gas pellets into the room. Müller wrote, regarding the job of the SS men:

                  “They removed the covers from the six camouflaged openings. Then, protected by gas masks, they poured the green-blue crystals of the deadly gas into the gas chamber.”

                  Müller also wrote that the noise from truck engines was used to “prevent anyone from hearing the shouting and banging on doors of the dying in the gas chamber.”

                  Pery Broad, an SS man who worked in the Gestapo office next door to the gas chamber, corroborates Müller’s description of six holes. Broad wrote a report, after he was captured by the British, in which he described how the gas pellets were poured into the Krema I gas chamber:

                  “… the covers had been removed from the six holes in the ceiling…”
                  End quote

                  Pery Broad was probably tortured by the British and that’s why he talked. Maybe he was trying to convey to future generations that there was no gas chamber in the Auschwitz main camp, by giving false testimony.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 19, 2016 @ 7:08 pm

                • All liars….now holohoaxers please explain how it all worked….sprinkles of zyclon b pellets poured through fake holes and puff a poisonous gas…
                  And in 15 minutes or less they were all dead and the chambers were evacuated to.
                  Zyclone B works over a long period of time an hour or more after 10 minutes it will only be 10% done so what was said is impossible people could not have been gassed in 15 minutes unless they put more ZB in the room.
                  Then we have the impossibilities of the high cremations being done in the time they say and how many people they say were cremated more nonsense.
                  And we have some looney Birds here that believe it all. Miracles upon miracles!

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 19, 2016 @ 7:17 pm

                • You wrote “And in 15 minutes or less they were all dead and the chambers were evacuated to.”

                  The gas chamber in the main Auschwitz camp had no crematorium, in which to evacuate the dead bodies.
                  The gas chamber room WAS the crematorium. The only other room was the oven room.

                  The crematorium was converted into a bomb shelter for the SS men. There were many SS men working in the building right next to the crematorium, so that is why this room was chosen for a bomb shelter.

                  There could not have been a gas chamber in the room that is shown to tourists today because the room was not air tight and there was a door with a glass window in the room. If this had been a gas chamber, the victims would have broken the glass.

                  One thing that Holocaust Believers forget is that the German people are very smart. If they had wanted to build a gas chamber, they would have built the world’s best gas chamber.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 19, 2016 @ 7:26 pm

                • The alleged gassings could not possibly have taken place at Treblinka, Sobibor and Belzec in the manner that we’ve been told, because there were multiple gas chambers at each of these places. At Treblinka for example, it is claimed that a small facility existed, which contained 3 chambers, and a much larger structure – built later – which housed up to 10 chambers ( although this number does vary somewhat).

                  Well, one just can’t blow in exhaust fumes – or indeed any kind of gas – into multiple chambers from a single engine placed outside each structure, because the gas simply won’t enter the chambers evenly, and will certainly not reach the chambers that are situated further along the line. Only the first chamber would receive the bulk of the gas, and the others increasingly smaller, and negligable amounts. In addition to this, there would be the problem of what’s called ‘backpressure’ – which is what happens to any gas that flows through a pipe when the initial force subsides as the distance from the engine increases. The walls of the pipe, and the number of angles and curves it makes, begins to restrict the flow so much that it slows down and can even reverse direction.

                  So, for the process to work, then a system of electric pumps, valves, regulators and a complicated outlet manifold – which could distribute the gas evenly along separate pipes into each chamber – would have to be deployed. But even then, the system would be hopelessly inefficient, because diesel exhaust is not a “clean” gas. In fact, it is outright dirty, sooty stuff, consisting of all the unburnt residues and impurities. These would very quickly seize up the system, as they would stick to the intricate workings of the valves and pumps etc. You could only manage two or three gassings before the entire system would have to be closed down for cleaning and maintenance.

                  But there are no accounts from any witnesses that such a system was in place, or even that the SS had any qualified personnel there to operate it. The SS on permanent duty at Treblinka consisted of male nurses, police officers, gardeners and builders, while the operation of the engines seems to have been left in the hands of a couple of weird Ukrainian militia soldiers.

                  Comment by Talbot — January 19, 2016 @ 9:46 pm

                • The official holocaust narrative as applied to Sobibor is in some disarray, because they can’t seem to explain the kind of gas which was used to allegedly kill the victims. The USHMM states clearly that the Nazis were using a diesel engine, but this is contradicted by the testimony of SS Sergeant Erich Fuchs who claimed to have actually installed the engine there.

                  Fuchs gave sworn evidence at the Sobibor Trial at Hagen in 1965, and stated;- “I installed shower heads in the gas chambers. The nozzles were not connected to any water pipes…It was a heavy Russian petrol engine of at least 200 horsepower, water cooled, V-8 Gasoline engine…We put it on a concrete plinth and attached a pipe to the exhaust outlet.”

                  Neither the UHSMM nor Fuchs mentions a distribution system for the gas, to ensure that each individual chamber received the equivalent amount. Nor is there is any reference to pumps, valves, regulators etc, which would be necessary to achieve this.

                  It would appear that Yad Vashem has even thrown in the towel in attempting to explain the type of gas used – they just say “poison gas”, without bothering to say what chemical agent it was. This is like reading a Victorian penny-dreadful novel, where the wicked Sir Jasper arrives in his wife’s bed chamber with a medicine bottle boldly labelled “POISON”. The author doesn’t tell his readers what this evil poison is. Its all left to the imagine – just like the holocaust.

                  Comment by Talbot — January 20, 2016 @ 9:47 am

                • Actually Talbot the only camp specifically stated to use diesel was Treblinka. There is some dispute about that, as testimony indicated that actually two engines were used at the camp, one a diesel and the other a regular gasoline engine. One of these engines was used to power the generator, the other used to kill.
                  Testimony regarding the use of the Diesel engine is uncertain. Holocaust Controversies makes a good argument that the gas engine was the execution device. I contend that diesel is lethal in a closed gas chamber but I can see either side.
                  Testimony states that there was a system of pipes that delivered the exhaust into each chamber. This is SS testimony, not victim testimony.
                  There is some indication that Treblinka used Zyclon B. Furtherglory mentions that she bought literature at Treblinka that states Zyclon B was used, however, this is the only place I’ve come across this. My understanding is that the Action Reinhard Camps used Carbon Monoxide to execute the Jews, not Zyclon B.
                  Hoess mentioned that he felt the ARC were inefficient and that ZB was more efficient at killing.
                  Jeff the Irish Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 11:12 am

                • Actually Talbot you can thank Hermie and Jim.
                  Hermie thinks I’m a Jew and Jim called me an Irish Jew (though, I think Jim was joking and I honestly thought it was funny) so in their honor I decided to tack on the “Irish Jew” to my name.
                  I actually apologize for that, when I am giving a serious answer (and in your case I was) I leave off the joke at the end.
                  When I am kidding I tack on the “Irish Jew.”
                  But, to answer what you said, the only camp I know of that used diesel was Treblinka. I’ve only seen ZB in connection with FG. My main source material for the AR Camps is Arad’s Belzec, Sobibor and Treblinka, a very good book by the authors at Holocaust Controversies and various websites. I’ve looked, there are no other comprehensive books on all three camps other than what I listed above. There are individual books on each camps but I prefer to look at the camps as a whole.
                  Oddly, there are no books that I know of on Majdanek. I’ve only seen it mentioned.
                  There is a book on Majdanek by the people who write the so-called “Holocaust Handbooks” but I don’t take those seriously.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 1:52 pm

                • The Holocaust handbooks are the best…..I have the set which consists of about 30 plus books.
                  I have a pretty extensive library and video collection that I read/watch everyday….that is what I do to keep up on the knuckleheads that post their crap here.
                  Or you can read the Dr. Seus books out there that our HoloHoax friends here on scrapbooks like to refer to…LOL
                  https://archive.org/details/Holocaust_Handbooks

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 2:24 pm

                • I see that you’ve added a new title after your name, Jeff. Well I hope you’re not discovered digging your potatoes in the paddy-fields on the Sabbath!

                  UHSMM states that “carbon monoxide generated from diesel engines” was used as the gassing agent at all three Reinhardt camps. Yad Vashem says diesel at Treblinka, but just says “poison gas” at the other two sites. I agree with you that there is testimony (maybe from Erich Fuchs) about a diesel engine, and also a gasoline engine that was used to generate power in the Treblinka camp.

                  But I’m afraid there is scant testimony from anywhere that a system for distributing the gas into the individual chambers existed. You would have to provide credible sources before we could accept that claim.

                  I must admit, I’ve never heard that Zyklon B was being used at Treblinka before, and the claim that Hoess found the carbon-monoxide process so inefficient, that he decided to use Zyklon instead, is, well – complete moonshine! There were no gassings anywhere. Poor old Hoess had to come out with all this nonsense just to satisfy his interrogators. Cheers.

                  Comment by Talbot — January 20, 2016 @ 12:29 pm

                • Let’s not forget that the original story that they told said that the Jews with steam to death like lobsters ……
                  please give me a break.
                  They sure stopped that explanation when they saw how stupid It was.
                  What this shows is that they would believe anything that people would say just to make it look like the Germans were the bad guys but then again some things are just so stupid they had a drop them. As you intelligently investigate the Holohoax he will see that the whole story is made up of many many stories like this so how people can believe the stuff is beyond me which shows that there are more stupid people in the world than I thought.

                  http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p133_Allen.html

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 12:48 pm

                • Obviously Jeff is not impressed with Revisionist books; which is fair enough – he’s quite entitled to read literature which he finds more palatable. But I think Mr Rizoli is much nearer to establishing the truth when he recommends the Holocaust Handbook Series. These are written (I think) by reputable authors, who have done an enormous amount of research in this field. I would go so far as to describe them as professors – well-grounded historians who can easily compete with the loftiest academics at the top universities.

                  Say what you will about David Irving, but I give him credit for exposing the academic “racket”, whereby the establishment scholars don’t even deem it necessary to leave their ivory towers in order to do research out in the field, They don’t interview witnesses, or seek out new information from “primary sources”. They simply quote from books that other establishment academics with official credentials have published. Irving describes them as like a pack of dogs chasing each others tails! How true – they are simply regurgitating the same old stories that come out WW2 and its immediate aftermath. And that – to me – is all very dodgy stuff indeed.

                  I have just finished reading Volume 31 of the HH series, entitled Breaking The Spell, by Dr. Nicholas Kollerstrom, who was formerly a Professor of Science at University College London. He has analysed the alleged homicidal gas chamber stories, but not being an expert in chemistry himself, he has ensured that his work has been thoroughly checked by someone who is a qualified chemist – namely, Germar Rudolf, who Mr Rizoli has had the honour of interviewing on a You Tube video.

                  Comment by Talbot — January 20, 2016 @ 3:36 pm

                • My issue with Irving isn’t what methods he used to write his history. Of course, primary sources have their own dangers and I’m afraid Irving is hardly an unbiased observer.
                  My issue is with his distortion of the historic record.
                  Oh, I think this week Irving believes in the Holocaust. It’s Wednesday, it’s entirely possible that he will change his mind on Friday.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 4:48 pm

            • wolf wrote: “I guess then that all these perpetrators were lying, and/or tortured: http://www.shamash.org/holocaust/denial/testimony.txt

              What about the ‘perpetrators’ who confessed the use of homicidal gas chambers at Buchenwald (where no orthodox historian still claims there were homicidal gas chambers)?

              https://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1045&sid=e44caa6150d0d30cecfe1b99d298456e

              What about the Wehrmacht guy Arno Diere/Düre who confessed his own involvement in the Katyn massacre?

              What about the ‘information’ collected by the interrogators at the Soviet mock trials during Stalin’s purges?

              http://postimg.org/image/p7fg8h0yj/full/

              What about all the convicted ‘criminals’ who confessed their alleged crimes and were exonerated after a while (often a very long while) by DNA testing and other new scientific methods?

              Are we supposed to simply put all those confessions aside and make as if confessions had any intrinsic probative value?

              False confessions are in fact very prevalent and commonplace, whether you know that or not, whether you like that or not. Most of time, torture isn’t even needed. The booming voice of Sergeant X or Captain Y is often enough.

              How long woul it take for you to confess any BS if I were an Allied interrogator telling you that I should visit your wife and kids or turn them to the Soviets for deportation to a Gulag or another? 5 minutes? 10 maybe?

              Any alleged Nazi perpetrator denying the ‘Holocaust’ would have been depicted as an unrepentent murderer and sent to jail for life or executed. On the hand, many alleged Nazi perpetrators talking about the ‘Holocaust’ at their trials got light sentences and often got out before their term. Germany was very critized for those light sentences…by people failing (or pretending to fail) to understand that such light sentences were needed to get all those so precious confessions from alleged perpetrators…

              And what about the numerous Nazis who denied the ‘Holocaust’ or any knowledge of it (when they were at the right place during the war to be aware of it)? [https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=8165] Who decided that their words are useless as far as history is concerned and the words corroborating the victors’ atrocity propaganda are undeniable and holy evidence? No answer required. Rhetorical…

              Comment by hermie — January 19, 2016 @ 9:11 pm

              • edit: Sorry, “on the other hand” instead of “on the hand”

                Comment by hermie — January 19, 2016 @ 9:13 pm

              • edit: “srebrenica wrote” instead of “wolf wrote”.

                Comment by hermie — January 19, 2016 @ 11:31 pm

                • There is no evidence whatsoever that Perry (Pery) Broad was tortured into writing his report – in fact he offered to write it for his captors, confirmed at his trial in 1964. For a more detailed analysis of the Broad Report, and his trial (with sources) see::

                  http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/how-reliable-and-authentic-is-broad.html

                  Also http://www.holocaustresearchproject.org/othercamps/perybroad.html

                  I know these are ‘True Believer’ sites, but at least the first site also covers the criticism of the report by Faurisson, Rudlof, Mattogno. and other revisionists.

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 7:12 am

                • Pery Broad was released in 1947…what tends to confirm my point that there was no personal benefits at all in denying the ‘Holocaust’ at post-war mock trials but huge personal benefits in singing the victors’ song like a good trained canary at post-war mock trials.

                  By the way, testimonies and confessions are in essence mere series of words without any intrinsic value, whether you like it or not. There exist numerous examples (not only the ones I’ve posted above) of testimonies and confessions that turned out to be nothing but bullshit. Testimonies and confessions can be used to guide the search of physical evidence, nothing else. Only probative in Stalinist-like mock trials. Sorry…

                  Comment by hermie — January 21, 2016 @ 2:44 am

                • Hermie – I have a feeling you didn’t read the link I posted:

                  ‘In order to clarify the authorship of the report the court examined two more witnesses from the Munsterlager on 1 October 1964. Cornelis van het Kaar was commandant of a British unit for the interrogation of German POWs in Gorleben in June 1945. Broad approached him in mid June and told him about Auschwitz concentration camp. Van het Kaar realized the importance of the testimony and requested Broad to write down what he knew about these matters. The manuscript of the report was written by Broad himself by hand, the final report by his sergeant Paul Winter with a typewriter.’

                  He was released in 1947 and was convicted in 1965 of being involved in tortures, selections and executions.

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 21, 2016 @ 9:32 am

                • Srebrenica wrote: “He was released in 1947 and was convicted in 1965 of being involved in tortures, selections and executions.”

                  Waw! 6 years in custody (2 years in the 1940’s and 4 years in the 1960’s), what a hard punishment for such crimes!! Still can’t see the benefits of collaboration in the victors’ storytelling? Really???

                  Comment by hermie — January 21, 2016 @ 10:00 pm

              • Jim

                Thanks for the long and uninteresting cut/paste Jim – a link to the CODOH website would have been enough. Please remember that Jeff and others read these posts on his phone.

                So here’s one for you http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/belzec-sobibor-treblinka-holocaust_3633.html – this one actually has some eyewitness/perpetrator accounts – pesky eyewitnesses, they do seem to keep popping up.

                Quote ‘When you at least make an attempt to read what I put together get back to me to show me where I’m wrong.
                I WILL not debate a newcomer here unless they put the time in. Especially a cut and paste man who has not done any deep research.
                I’ve done hundreds of videos on the topic what have you done?
                Then you come along here thinking that we haven’t already heard what you have to say? LOL
                You’re old news and everything you say has been thoroughly refuted and laughed at.’

                I have read the CODOH evidence that you pasted above before – I just think it doesn’t stack up. I’ve been looking at FG’s site for over 2 years (compliments to you FG – I don’t agree with your views but the posts are normally well written, interesting and provide a forum for debate).

                So Jim, since these are my first posts, how on earth do you know whether I have done deep research or not?

                I have looked at your site a few times. I didn’t realise you have created hundreds of videos – that’s actually quite frightening lol.

                Anyway, the exam question I originally posted for you was to refute the perpetrator evidence in the link I posted. If I wanted to know about cremating bodies at Treblinka then I guess I would have provided a different challenge. I’m still waiting for you to refute their claims with some actual evidence.

                Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 8:06 am

                • I don’t have to prove anything……you HoloHuxsters have to prove it.
                  Proving something that didn’t happened is a pretty tough thing to do.
                  I just look at your nonsense and laugh. I believe most of you HoloHuxsters are here to waste our time.
                  Nobody in their right mind would believe the crap that you present here.
                  Yup The Holocaust happened because it happened. Praise the Lord!

                  JR

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 8:21 am

                • I agree that Jim’s videos are frightening.
                  Jeff the Irish Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 12:18 pm

                • Jim is right. The burden of proof is on you, the accuser, as it is in every normal investigation about a crime. Winning a war enables victors to sell their own propaganda as an international state truth, as ‘history’, and to reverse the burden of proof, but it is of no help to prove a victor’s allegations in a serious and convincing way (unfortunately for you). The victors and other Holohoax benefactors spent decades in comfort, with their easy upside down burden of proof, claiming they didn’t have to prove their claims. But that’s just sham history writing. And you know it.

                  Comment by hermie — January 21, 2016 @ 3:07 am

                • THE VICTORS WRITE THE HISTORY. Thank you, Hermie for being the voice of reason. ANY comment which begins with or includes: “…. survivor testimony ….” is almost completely disregarded by most experts except for their agenda of promoting nonsense (and that is financially advantageous to do so). Glad you’re back.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 7:20 am

                • “For the scientific historian a witness statement does not represent real history”

                  “it is necessary to recognize that the lack of traces involves the inability to directly establish the reality of the existence of homicidal gas chambers.”

                  – French exterminationist historian Jacques Baynac

                  Comment by hermie — January 25, 2016 @ 8:26 am

                • Srebrenica – no doubt regarding the witnesses. Storytellers are a dime a dozen and in regard to the whole survivor testimony, AGAIN!!!

                  “Most of the memoirs and reports of Holocaust survivors are full of preposterous verbosity, graphomanic exaggeration, dramatic effects, overestimated self-inflation, dilettante philosophizing, would-be lyricism, unchecked rumors, bias, partisan attacks…” –Samuel Gringauz, “Jewish Social Studies” (New York), January 1950, Vol. 12, p. 65

                  Eyewitness testimonies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYehKI0isO8

                  False Memories and Misinformation Effect: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQ-96BLaKYQ

                  Comment by Diane King — January 25, 2016 @ 4:21 pm

            • Because of the bombing and consequent starvation in the German cities, not to mention the TRUE holocaust, the Frank family were taken care of in the camps until the ability to fend off the dreaded lice plagues broke down due to railway disruptions. Yes, the Diary of Anne Frank has been propaganda directed of misinformation. “… women and children deported to their deaths….” Hardly. It’s tragic when people who claim to be so intelligent allow themselves to be led around by the nose they stick up in the air and then spout out ignorance. I HAVE read the diary. She died of typhus. Apparently, according to the myth, men her father’s age was supposed to be gassed. Wonder how he and numerous others ‘dodged this bullet’. If mom and dad were to go to the camps, the kids would go along. There was an effort to keep them together in the family camp, as I understand, in Birkenau.

              You obviously don’t think the Germans had a cause. They had seen what the jews had done in the other countries in Europe, in Germany itself during the Weimar years. They didn’t want to kill them (or they – as efficiency experts – would have executed them and not transported them during an expensive and exacting 2-front war) they wanted them out of the Reich and had been able to send nearly half a million out before the war started (Transfer Agreement). The Germans had a cause.

              Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 6:11 pm

              • You wrote: “If mom and dad were to go to the camps, the kids would go along. There was an effort to keep them together in the family camp, as I understand, in Birkenau.”

                There was a section of Auschwitz-Birkenau called the “Czech family camp”. AFAIK, the Frank family was NOT put into this family camp. Anne and her sister were in one section of the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp, and her father was in another section. There was another family camp where the Gypsies were kept together.

                Comment by furtherglory — January 21, 2016 @ 5:56 am

        • Groening’s testimony – http://www.pbs.org/auschwitz/40-45/victims/perps.html#groning

          Rizoli/King – anything to refute this? (no he wasn’t tortured – read Laurence Rees)

          Comment by srebrenica — January 19, 2016 @ 3:48 pm

          • jrizoli
            The picture you are showing on ‘Hotel Auschwitz’ (You Tube), was a staged celebration photograph taken after the massacre of 500 so called SS-Guards, who were domiciled in the hospital complex, near the coal bunker at KZ Dachau. The inmate with his cigarette in his mouth murdered an SS-man with a shovel, after he was shot (the SS-man) by a GI with Cal .45 pistol in his left foot, which is never shown, and could not move. Most of these inmates were trusted employees who worked on a shift bases at the near-by Heating Plant and had free movement within that area. They were NOT ‘liberated’ from the Main Camp as is often quoted, which is almost one mile further east.
            Most of them were Poles and two of them (brothers) stayed on after the war and continued operating the plant and still there after I left in 1956. The two killers of the wounded SS-man migrated to what I was told under the DP-system to the States.
            For further info: read FG’s comments on: http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/DachauLiberation/BuechnerAccount.html, or my own blog:http://dachaukz.blogspot.co.nz/2011/08/dachau-kz-suffering-and-death.html

            Comment by Herbert Stolpmann — January 19, 2016 @ 8:31 pm

        • I think Jim has a very short attention span – he seems to look at the top of a page when he is given a link, see something that doesn’t fit into his warped view of the world and replies on here with ‘Please show us proof that there was anyone that was executed in a homicidal gas chamber’. I don’t think that he will be reading any ‘True Believer’ books written by real historians any time soon.

          Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 1:18 pm

        • Jeff, all of us have been saturated and inundated with the holocost myth ALL of our lives. I’ve probably most of what’s out there, having taken such a course in college where I reviewed 12 books LIKE “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich” (still leaves a bad taste in my mouth.) So that’s mainstream and easy to ‘fall in line’ because EVERYONE believes that. Read and pursue and advocate for something that is criminalized in 18 countries (plus) and all of a sudden, you are descended upon – why? BECAUSE YOU QUESTION THE MAINSTREAM.

          The SS assigned to the camps were assigned. It wasn’t volunteer. The kapos and sonderkommandos eagerly adapted to their role, so one would think they had not volunteered but sought out the positions. The horrible treatment of the rest of the prisoners came from the volunteered sadism of these positions.

          YOU, Jeff should read a book NOT written by the bought off, brain dead mainstream and maybe YOU might not only learn something but that it would open YOUR eyes.

          Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 3:40 pm

          • Jeff is Mr. Magoo when it comes to reading…
            Big bulging eyes but cannot see.

            Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 3:44 pm

          • Well Diane I guess that’s a start where you admit to the horrible treatment of prisoners by the Kapos. Jeff reads books written by recognised historians, most of whom have actually interviewed survivors and perpetrators, rather than watching poorly produced videos – I suggest you take some time out and do the same. Let me suggest the books by Lawrence Rees to you – he was I believe the first to interview Groening. ‘Their Darkest Hour’ may be a good start for you.

            Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 4:16 pm

            • I wrote about Lawrence Rees in this previous blog post: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/tag/laurence-rees/

              Comment by furtherglory — January 20, 2016 @ 5:34 pm

              • Thanks Furtherglory – your blog refers to survivor testimony – I was referring to Rees’ interviews with perpetrators which are published in ‘Their Darkest Hour’

                Comment by srebrenica — January 21, 2016 @ 10:38 am

            • Good, bad or indifferent, all the books I mentioned support the holocost myth, which was my point. I read the fiction like HOLOCAUST (novel made into a miniseries you swore was a documentary), TREBLINKA (turns out that was more fact than fiction as well) to name a couple more. I read nearly everything I could get my hands on and as I said, whether they were good, bad or indifferent, they ALL supported the myth – and I knew there was ‘something wrong with this picture’.

              It wasn’t until 1999 that finally I was able to see why I hadn’t bought into the demonizing of Germans all my life, that NOW I knew IT WAS A MYTH, a new religion in nearly every country that I was NOT going to embrace.

              Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 7:01 pm

          • But I have read denier material, Diane. I’ve been more than fair about this.
            Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 7:40 am

            • Jeff…I’m curious…you’ve read denier books, have you read in them the outright blatant lies like the ones I’ve posted here about the HoloHoax from your buddies and fellow HoloHuxsters? How about the 120 foot high pile of clothes at Treblinka? Must of been a real tourist attraction. I’m wondering what poor Jew had to lug the clothes to the top of that mountain. Must of been a big crane they had. Where was that BIG crane, must of been out for repairs.
              The clothes mountain would of made a nice landmark, or even a good light house ……funny how it’s NEVER mentioned except by the wacko who said it. You obviously live in a science fantasy world and you are right at home with all the liars. To you all the lies make perfectly good sense….LOL Nothing better than being steamed to death at ….or electrocuted, or how about drowned in big pits, the lies go on and on.
              Yup….these are testimonies made for science fiction movies. and you go for them….hard to believe.. So this is what your belief system is about? Good luck with that.

              http://balder.org/judea/The-Most-Fantastic-Holocaust-Survivor-Stories-Jewish-Soap-Lampshades-Fertilizer-Mengele-Miracles.php

              Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 8:28 am

              • Of course I noted the discrepancies that you blather on about, Jim (BTW, thank you for posting the link with the crazy Holocaust stories…..AGAIN).
                These are normal within the fog of war, in an era where news was not immediate. However, if you look at what was said and how the evidence converges, you see the pattern.
                I completely disagree with Talbot that the “Holocaust Handbooks” are written by qualified people, primarily because when I’ve read some of them I always look the authors up. I want to see who that author is. Inevitably the author is someone who is right wing, approves of right wing causes and is inevitably anti-Semitic.
                I’ve always said I would trust a Holocaust denier if I could find one who wasn’t an anti-Semite and was willing to criticize Hitler and not be an unabashed admirer.
                So yes, when I’ve read the “Holocaust Handbooks” I always fact check them and see who the author is. Inevitably their arguments don’t hold up.
                I don’t really see the point of reading any more of them. To me they are the same old rehashed garbage.
                I will say, to be completely honest, that I’ve only read 3 of them. But I’m afraid that’s all you’ll get out of me.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 11:20 am

                • You wrote: “I’ve always said I would trust a Holocaust denier if I could find one who wasn’t an anti-Semite and was willing to criticize Hitler and not be an unabashed admirer.”

                  Go to the Inconvenient History website and read the articles written by Carlo Mattogno.

                  On the website, you will read this about Mattogno: “Mattogno is considered to be the foremost Holocaust revisionist researcher in the world today.” I agree with that statement. I consider him to be completely unbiased.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 21, 2016 @ 11:34 am

                • Most of the books in the Holocaust Handbooks Series are written by Mottogno. Germar Rudolf has done a lot of work editing and publishing them.
                  http://vho.org/dl/ENG.html you can down load them FREE here.
                  I have all the downloads and the books plus many others to refute the HoloHuxsters that post here.
                  The HoloHuxsters real job here is to steer people off the track to the truth and waste our/their time.
                  Hopefully we have those that see through their tactics. The Holocaust truth is like eating a good tomato, you know when you got one.

                  JR
                  CCFIILE.COM

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 11:46 am

                • You wrote: “Most of the books in the Holocaust Handbooks Series are written by Mottogno. Germar Rudolf has done a lot of work editing and publishing them.”

                  Now that I know that Germar Rudolf was involved in editing these books, I am sure that these books are correct.

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 21, 2016 @ 12:34 pm

                • I doubt it, I mean, even if you found such a person who is a ‘denier’ in your words, when you heard him speak, you would still JUDGE him to be antisemitic and pro-Hitler in order to discount anything he said. Funny, we should use the same criteria for the holocost supporters – try to find one who isn’t bowing (or banging their heads) at the wailing wall in slobbering devotion to any and everything jewish/israel, decrying any and everything German, especially National Socialists or ANYONE involved with them in ANY fashion. The lines are clearly drawn but one thing is for sure, when the ‘dust clears’, truth will out.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 3:21 pm

                • I have heard several Holocaust survivors speak. I wrote this blog post about the last survivor that I heard speak: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2015/08/03/the-story-of-holocauast-survivor-albert-rosa-as-told-in-his-own-words/

                  Comment by furtherglory — January 21, 2016 @ 3:31 pm

                • Admittedly, to be honest, I have heard a number of holocost survivors speak who did not have crazy stories, speaking about the fair treatment they received in places like Auschwitz, the amenities. It’s not pleasant being away from home, knowing that your national leadership and your leadership residing in other countries have done NOTHING but antagonize the ruling (National Socialist) government. Still, their conversation about money they earned, the commissaries, the bands, the pools and saunas and such, gave a more balanced picture. Also that they worked long, hard hours. It was not in the NS best interest to kill these people. Laborers were at a premium, especially during a 2-front war. The attempt to keep families together, the medical care they received when sick. Somehow, we don’t hear of THESE testimonies.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 4:09 pm

                • Diane, seriously, you are stereotyping me.
                  I don’t “bang my head on a wailing wall.” I’m not a stooge for anyone, no one employs me to do this.
                  I’m very much simply an amateur historian.
                  I don’t demonize Adolph Hitler or the German people. I simply put Hitler in his proper historical context. He over extended himself in his attempt to build an empire, much like Napoleon. Germany suffered for it. Now, along the way his regime murdered a lot of people, primarily Jews. So did Stalin’s regime in the Soviet Union and Mao’s regime in China. In a way, the Shoah (I use this term when I speak specifically about the Jews) is not unique, people have murdered people since the beginning of time. What is unique about the Shoah is that it was murderously single minded towards a specific religious group, even when it was a detriment. It also continued long after the Nazis stopped murdering other groups, like Soviet POWs and the disabled.
                  The Communist regimes targeted anyone and everyone that it thought were threats. Another difference is that Communism was lethal only within its borders, German National Socialism became lethal only when it spilled over its borders.
                  So please do not stereotype me again.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 7:36 pm

                • I have pretty much the whole series of Holocaust handbooks and I’m going through each one of them. you might want to read dissecting the Holocaust by Germar Rudolph are you going to say that he wasn’t an expert in his field.
                  But I guess we have to believe your experts like while Hilberg, Van Pelt, and Pressac, like they had it all figured out.
                  Pressac was a pharmacist. That makes him an expert….LOL
                  Van Pelt architectual historian.
                  Raul Hilberg political scientist historian??
                  He didn’t even show up for Zundrls second trial because he was exposed so badly in the first one he didn’t have the balls to show up again.
                  Yup these are the guys that are the experts.

                  If any of these writers had to prove the case in court they would lose and you know it

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 21, 2016 @ 11:37 am

                • Fact check? I doubt it other than if it doesn’t meet with the politically correct, tired mantra of the holocost lobby and their slobbering minions, then it can’t possibly be true. I guess that’s a definition of a pseudo-intellectual in this sphere.

                  Comment by Diane King — January 21, 2016 @ 3:25 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “I’ve always said I would trust a Holocaust denier if I could find one who wasn’t an anti-Semite and was willing to criticize Hitler and not be an unabashed admirer.”

                  Your fallacious argument can be reversed easily.

                  One could say as well: I’ve always said that I would trust a Holocaust believer and promoter if I could find one who wasn’t a Zionist, or a pro-Semite and an anti-Nazi ideologist*, and was willing to admit Hitler did many great positive things for the German people and Israel is a racist state implementing ethnic cleansing.

                  And why should a person’s anti-Semitism nullify his conclusions in the first place? There is no connection between anti-Semitism and lie, as there is no connection between pro-Semitism and truth. Do you really believe that pro-Semitism is a guarantee of reliability and honesty??? There exist pro-Semitic liars and anti-Semitic truthtellers. Truthfulness-reliability-honesty, and someone’s feelings toward Jews are unconnected matters. Fallacious deception.

                  * Or perhaps you will tell me that ideological/political biases are no biases when in the ‘right’ (i.e. politically-correct) direction. Will you?

                  Comment by hermie — January 30, 2016 @ 8:28 am

    • I object to these trials, Wolf. Especially due to the fact that this man suffers from dementia.
      Also, how do you honestly prove guilt in a circumstance like this? Eyewitnesses? After 71 years? What sort of physical evidence places this man at the scene of the crime? Is serving at Auschwitz proof that this man committed crimes?
      There are too many unknowns. I believe this is a waste of time and taxpayer money.
      Even if convicted he will not serve a day in prison due to his age. The time for trials like this is long past.
      Jeff

      Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 12:33 pm

  27. The result is a foregone conclusion…Guilty as charged. If I was his defense lawyer I would advice him to say guilty on day one. That would at least spare us the daily MSM reportage from tearful witnesses of the Shoa . It is after all a show trial where everyone knows the verdict before it is announced.

    Comment by peter — January 18, 2016 @ 1:20 pm

  28. prosecutors

    With all the anti-Semitic muslims they’re currently importing, the Staatsanwaltschaft will perhaps soon have many case of Volksverhetzung usw to deal with, and therefore not enough time or resources to prosecute former Auschwitz medics — how will they prioritize, das ist die Frage.

    Comment by eah — January 18, 2016 @ 9:19 am

    • Not to worry, eah. The anti-Semitic crimes of the muslims will be covered up and/or blamed on the xenophobic German extremist right-wingers. The police in NRW, anyway, have been covering the theft and sex crimes of migrants since 2014, in order not to stir up meat for the xenophobes. It’s a fact. http://newobserveronline.com/german-state-secret-criminal-north-africans/

      Comment by Carolyn Yeager — January 18, 2016 @ 6:12 pm

      • Anti Semitic crimes of the muslims? Do you actually think that what happened in Cologne was focused on Jews – I agree with Jeff – you are really full of shit

        Comment by srebrenica — January 19, 2016 @ 4:47 pm

        • Maybe, but you are really stupid. You and Jeff both.

          Comment by Carolyn Yeager — January 19, 2016 @ 7:50 pm

          • Sticks and stones, Carolyn.
            BTW, still think I’m a Jew?
            Just curious.
            Incidentally I took some time out to look up the right wing political group you seem to like in Germany. Pegida? Pegrida? Something like that.
            Anyway, I think their main objection to the women being harassed by the North Africans is that they think women should be in the home, barefoot and preferably pregnant. Aren’t they opposed to equal rights for women?
            I don’t know about you but I think if I was a woman that it would offend the crap out of me. But, I’m not a Hitler Hero Worshipper like yourself so what do I know, right?
            Anyway, have a nice evening.
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 19, 2016 @ 9:12 pm

            • Jeff wrote: “BTW, still think I’m a Jew? Just curious.”

              That haunts you, isn’t it? You seem obsessed by that thought. Looks like what a Jew disturbed to have been uncovered, would do. Suspect…

              Comment by hermie — January 19, 2016 @ 9:32 pm

              • I’m not really that complicated, Hermie.
                I want her to say “yes” and then explain why so I can make fun of her again. Yes, I know that’s rather childish but I can be that way sometimes.
                So, no, Hermie. I’m not “haunted.” I’m simply misbehaving.
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 4:04 am

                • Unconvincing, Jeff. I don’t believe a single word of your response.

                  Even more unconvincing and lousy because you have just missed a good opportunity to “make fun of her again” when she depicted the recent incidents in Cologne as “anti-Semitic crimes.” Unless there is something I’m unaware of, Jews and anti-Semitism were not involved in those incidents and Ms. Yeager’s depiction completely missed the point. How could you fail to seize that gold stick and to whip the ‘evil queen of denial’ with it? Shame on you! You won’t be remunerated by Israel this month, I’m afraid…😉

                  Comment by hermie — January 20, 2016 @ 5:32 am

              • I’m no longer trying to convince you that I’m not a Jew, Hermie (though it would entertain me if you quote Goebbels at me again, as if that would make me uncomfortable). I wanted her to go off on me on why I’m a Jew so that I could make fun of her again about it.
                I actually wish Isreal would pay me for doing this, I’m sure they pay really well and I could quit my regular job.
                I’ll tell you what, Hermie. In your honor I’ll start signing my name as “Jeff the Jew.” That will satisfy the little voices in your head that scream “He’s a Jew!!!!!!! He’s a Jew!!!!!!!!” I know this happens when you see someone comment that doesn’t share your world view.
                So, I hope this helps alleviate your mental condition that I call “Jews on the Brain Syndrome” (or, JOBS).

                For you Hermie,
                Jeff the Jew
                (Though, I don’t mind telling you, Jeff is a rather odd name for a Jew. Also, my last name is Kelly, which is Irish. I don’t know many Irish Jews, but hey, that’s not important, right?)

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 6:46 am

                • Jeff….the Irish Jew…..

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 20, 2016 @ 7:27 am

                • Your reductio ad absurdum ‘argument’ is entertaining. Really. But such gross tricks work only on the weak and impressionable minds, what I lack completely. Sorry…

                  Comment by hermie — January 21, 2016 @ 6:02 am

              • You are showing your weak mind Hermie.
                Apparently anyone who thinks differently than you is a Jew.
                Or, perhaps, in the pay of Jews.
                Your JOBS is working overtime.
                However, I now embrace my alleged “Jewish Identity.” I know it makes you feel better when I do that so I don’t mind.
                I’ve even added some additional titles:
                Chinese-Irish Jew
                There, you see? I’m Irish and based on what Diane said earlier I’m also a Chinese Communist.

                OH, I’VE GOT IT!!!!!!!!!

                Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 6:50 am

                • Jeff wrote: “You are showing your weak mind Hermie. Apparently anyone who thinks differently than you is a Jew. Or, perhaps, in the pay of Jews.”

                  Another great fallacy. Waw! You’re very fit today.

                  I didn’t you’re maybe a Jew only for thinking differently than me. And you know it.

                  Jeff wrote: “Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew”

                  Great trick. So clever. You’re invisible now.😉

                  Comment by hermie — January 21, 2016 @ 10:06 pm

                • Know what, Hermie?
                  I honestly don’t know why you think I’m a Jew.
                  I thought it was due to me not agreeing with you.
                  So, no more innuendoes, wink, wink, nudge, nudge.
                  Tell me why and give me your evidence.
                  Keep in mind, I know you won’t believe me if after you present your case I say, no Hermie, I’m not a Jew.
                  I’m simply curious. Genuinely curious. You apparently have all the answers, give me the answers.
                  Or, shut the fuck up about it.
                  Jeff
                  PS-I’m getting ready to go to bed so be quick about it.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 10:20 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “Tell me why and give me your evidence.”

                  Evidence is a word somewhat exaggerated. There are ‘criminal traces’ of it at most. (But Pressac vastly demonstrated how unreliable ‘criminal traces’ are to prove something satisfactorily.) That’s a suspicion based on your behavior in general and my own experience with individuals of the Chosen race.

                  Comment by hermie — January 22, 2016 @ 6:16 am

                • I see.
                  What about my “behavior” indicates that I am a Jew?
                  What sort of experiences did you have with the “Chosen” leads you to believe, sight unseen, knowing nothing about me other than what you’ve gleaned by my responses, my name, etc., that I am a Jew?
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 6:33 am

                • Jeff you are not a Jew but you think like a Jew which makes it even worse. To be able to backup a Jew and have to think like them shows how weak you are.

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 22, 2016 @ 7:11 am

                • Agreed, and I will post this everywhere I can: HOLOCOSTOMANIA (or buying into the myth of the holocost) rots the brain, corrupts the morals and creates deviant-bent psychopaths. The only cure for it is the truth that the Hoax Debunkers can provide.

                  THE MYTH OF GERMAN VILLAINY by Benton Bradberry: “As the title “The Myth of German Villainy” indicates, this book is about the mischaracterization of Germany as history’s ultimate “villain”. The “official” story of Western Civilization in the twentieth century casts Germany as the disturber of the peace in Europe, and the cause of both World War I and World War II, though the facts don’t bear that out. During both wars, fantastic atrocity stories were invented by Allied propaganda to create hatred of the German people for the purpose of bringing public opinion around to support the wars. The “Holocaust” propaganda which emerged after World War II further solidified this image of Germany as history’s ultimate villain. But how true is this “official” story? Was Germany really history’s ultimate villain? In this book, the author paints a different picture. He explains that Germany was not the perpetrator of World War I nor World War II, but instead, was the victim of Allied aggression in both wars. The instability wrought by World War I made the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia possible, which brought world Communism into existence. Hitler and Germany recognized world Communism, with its base in the Soviet Union, as an existential threat to Western, Christian Civilization, and he dedicated himself and Germany to a death struggle against it. Far from being the disturber of European peace, Germany served as a bulwark which prevented Communist revolution from sweeping over Europe. The pity was that the United States and Britain did not see Communist Russia in the same light, ultimately with disastrous consequences for Western Civilization. The author believes that Britain and the United States joined the wrong side in the war.”

                  http://www.amazon.com/Myth-German-Villainy-Benton-Bradberry/dp/1477231838/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1453493246&sr=1-1&keywords=the+myth+of+german+villainy

                  Comment by Diane King — January 22, 2016 @ 12:08 pm

                • Wait, I’m a psychopath now?
                  Ok.
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist psychopathic Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 22, 2016 @ 3:26 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “What about my “behavior” indicates that I am a Jew?”

                  A mixture of arrogance, insolence, chutzpah, the resort to all kind of fallacies, your obsessive fear of being uncovered as a Jew, hyper susceptibility and sensitivity to Jewish and Zionist matters, resort to emotional appeals and bullyings when short on arguments, the use of gross tricks for identity concealment purposes (such as your sudden and funny inability to write simple words like “hasbara” and “yeshiva” correctly), etc.

                  Comment by hermie — January 25, 2016 @ 7:37 am

                • Ah, I see.
                  Ok.
                  Well, if it makes you feel better to think I’m a Jew then by all means.
                  Just a few things:
                  I’m knowledgeable, not arrogant.
                  When I’ve shifted my identity I was jokingly.
                  When have I ever shown “sensitivity” to Zionism or Zionists? I don’t even know that much about the subject.
                  My “sensitivity” as you call it, to the Jewish victims is part of being a human, not a Jew. I’ve expressed the same sympathy to all of the victims, even the German ones.
                  So, if all that makes me a Jew in your sad, delusional world then by all means, you can believe I am a Jew.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 25, 2016 @ 5:28 pm

                • Oh, and Hermie, if concealing one’s identity on-line indicates that person is a Jew, does that mean who dares wings is a Jew? What about the Black Rabbit of Inle? Is he also a Jew (apparently some people think so).
                  Eah = Jew?
                  Mr. B. = Jew?
                  That’s fascinating.
                  You should let them know they are acting like Jews.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff — January 25, 2016 @ 6:00 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “So, if all that makes me a Jew in your sad, delusional world then by all means, you can believe I am a Jew.”

                  So stop raving and rambling about that. Nobody cares to know if you’re a Jew or not.

                  Again, your obsessive focus on that makes you look suspect. Frankly, I don’t know any Gentile as obsessed as yourself to know if some people might believe he’s a Jew or not. Just move on…

                  Comment by hermie — January 26, 2016 @ 6:13 pm

                • I will if you will, Daffy.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 26, 2016 @ 6:30 pm

            • Jeff wrote: “Anyway, I think their main objection to the women being harassed by the North Africans is that they think women should be in the home, barefoot and preferably pregnant.”

              Another great American thought about Muslims.😉

              Their behavior can be explained by the fact that those women were not Muslim women and so only good to be treated like whores. Those Muslim men would never have abused Muslim women – respectable women in their views – that way. Islam forbids disrespect (especially sexual disrespect) for women, for women deserving respect (in their views, again), i.e. pious Muslim women. For Muslim guys, Europe is like a big brothel full of infidel whores to use at their convenience. Such things happen all the time in every Muslim area of Europe. Only the magnitude of the Cologne incidents was unusual.

              A White non-Muslim woman can’t walk on numerous streets in Brussel – the capital of Europe – without being sexually harrassed.

              Comment by hermie — January 19, 2016 @ 9:53 pm

              • I thought you liked Muslims, Hermie. After all, a lot of Muslims don’t like Jews. And didn’t you once say that you hoped ISIS would give you enough Jewish scalps so you could build a minaret?

                Jeff the Jew

                Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 6:49 am

                • I hate Jews and I dislike Muslims, not as Muslims but as Arabs polluting my people’s blood through race-mixing. Had I power, I would get rid of the Jews AND all the non-Whites found on my land. Except from that, I indeed support the Muslims ethnically-cleansed in Palestine and mass murdered in US Zio-wars everywhere else.

                  Comment by hermie — January 21, 2016 @ 3:18 am

                • HERMIE. You here confess hating Jews. So I can suppose You regret that few Jews like me survived the Holocaust. But … some one has reasons to believe that You have a Jewish ancestor who more than a century ago accepted Baptism and married a Christian spouse. An investigation is in process. Keep attention.

                  Comment by Wolf Murmelstein — January 21, 2016 @ 9:35 am

                • Jeff wrote: “HERMIE. You here confess hating Jews.”

                  Haven’t I made that clear some time ago?

                  Jeff wrote: “So I can suppose You regret that few Jews like me survived the Holocaust. ”

                  Leave suppositions to people with a brain.😉

                  I wouldn’t call the herd of Jews everywhere “a few Jews”.

                  Jeff wrote: “An investigation is in process. Keep attention.”

                  So I’ll wait for the conclusion of Inspector Wolfie’s investigations. I hope he’ll hurry up. A good laugh in perspective…

                  Comment by hermie — January 21, 2016 @ 10:13 pm

                • Wolf said that, not me.
                  Though, if you did have Jewish ancestors that would truly define the word “ironic.”
                  Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

                  Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 10:30 pm

                • Jeff wrote: “Wolf said that, not me.”

                  That’s why I mentioned “Inspector Wolfie” in my previous comment.

                  Jeff wrote: “Though, if you did have Jewish ancestors that would truly define the word “ironic.””

                  That’s probably why Jewry used the same trick with Hitler in the 1930’s and the following decades.

                  Comment by hermie — January 22, 2016 @ 6:20 am

                • Jim wrote ‘Jeff you are not a Jew but you think like a Jew which makes it even worse. To be able to backup a Jew and have to think like them shows how weak you are.’

                  Well, Jeff is in good company then – Einstein was a Jew

                  Comment by srebrenica — January 22, 2016 @ 11:19 am

                • SRE….

                  Einstein was a Jew…..so what does that mean? I’m supposed to be impressed with that man who was responsible for what noble act?

                  Time to expose the HoloHoax…

                  Comment by jrizoli — January 22, 2016 @ 12:24 pm

                • Einstein is the best you can do? Plagiarized his wife’s work, taking it for his own? Maybe that IS the best y’all have.

                  HOLOCOSTOMANIA – Subscribing to the politically correct view of the holocost without question or discussion – rots the brain, corrupts the morals and creates a psychopath. The only cure is the truth provided by those who oppose and contend against the wholesale force feeding and consequent perversion of the myth of the holocost. (Diane King)

                  Comment by Diane King — January 22, 2016 @ 1:41 pm

              • Einstein is the best you can do?

                I don’t think I need to do any better lol

                Comment by srebrenica — January 23, 2016 @ 3:45 pm

          • Carolyn, IMHO you fully meet the criteria of stupid, and then some with your white supremacist nonsense. Why FG defends you when you criticize her is beyond me but I guess that’s up to her. At least FG tries to present facts to her audience rather than the rubbish you have on your website.

            Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 5:02 pm

  29. I will follow right behind you.
    The Jews are very happy to hold the door open for us when we
    go to that nursing home.

    Comment by jrizoli — January 18, 2016 @ 9:12 am

  30. I LIKE the nursing-home idea! I’ll be 95 in 24 years. I wonder how soon I could qualify, and maybe even meet you!

    By the way, I’ve been studying German all my life, and am real close to fluent. Should improve my ability to communicate with the other criminals.

    Comment by Jett Rucker — January 18, 2016 @ 9:03 am

    • I can’t believe that you are 71 years old. Your writing on Inconvenient History seems to have been written by a man of 51.

      Comment by furtherglory — January 18, 2016 @ 9:10 am

    • Your people, Jeff, if you embrace ‘the Irish Jew’, would be more inclined to put a bullet in the head of a dissenter as confine them to a nursing home. We who challenge your mantra of brain-dead political correctness and adherence to the holocost myth are anathema to the likes of you and yet WE are willing to discuss your point of view (though we’ve heard it all of our lives). You and your kind would rather see us with that bullet to the head (then send the bill for said bullet to the family in the typical soviet style) than hear our point of view. The fact that you’ve studied German all your life doesn’t give you any special dispensation – not with your mindset. And if your desire is to communicate with ‘the other criminals’, there are (and will be) plenty of jewish germans in the nursing homes as well – you’ll get along just fine with those self-hating German criminals.

      Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 3:45 pm

      • Diane – do you actually proof read what you post before you post it – this makes no sense whatsoever – i’m hoping you have had a few too many whiskeys – honestly it makes no sense. If you haven’t been drinking then can I suggest you contact your local doctor urgently

        Comment by srebrenica — January 20, 2016 @ 4:49 pm

        • Let me see if I can translate this into holocost-babble – the only language you seem to understand – or at least a close facsimile thereof.

          Jews don’t like people disagreeing with them. Those who constituted the hit squads in the soviet union (Cheka) went house to house killing, village by village. A disturbing predominance in the power structure of the soviets was jews – it’s their nature to steal, kill and destroy. These days, in their effort to suppress discussion or truth about the holocost, they isolate, marginalize and criminalize, accomplished in Europe, Canada and Australia. Their preference is total or maximum destruction for those who oppose their warped holocost endorsement viewpoint. If they had their druthers, they’d return to the old ways of the soviet cheka – thus the bullet in the head. Cheaper, quicker and problem solved.

          Thus there will be no discussion about the myth of the holocost without repercussions in these countries. They are trying to enact laws against us ‘holocaust deniers’ in this country but are still opposed by that pesky nuisance of the bill of rights … so far anyway.

          So srebrenica before you trot out your pedantic, simplified first-year, sorely lacking psychology ignorance, you might rethink taking shots and passing judgement when you don’t know what you’re talking about.

          Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 6:18 pm

          • Thanks Diane for the compliment (definition pedantic- excessively concerned with minor details or rules; overscrupulous). To challenge and debate you often need to focus on the minor details and double check/question sources – maybe you should try being pedantic yourself – it may prevent you from your sweeping generalisations. Russia had been an anti-Semitic state for centuries. The Cheka and NKVD did have Jews as members, but it also had non-Jews.

            At Lviv (Lwów. Lemberg) in 1941, the NKVD massacred thousands of prisoners (both Jewish and non Jewish) before the Germans arrived. The Germans blamed these massacres on the Soviet Jews then incited the local population start a pogrom, There are many pictures, and some films on the internet of both the NKVD massacres, and the pogrom

            You can read about it here: http://www.alfreddezayas.com/Chapbooks/Lembergmassacre.shtml.

            and here:

            http://www.academia.edu/1314919/The_Lviv_Pogrom_of_1941_The_Germans_Ukrainian_Nationalists_and_the_Carnival_Crowd

            and just for you:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversy_surrounding_the_Lviv_pogroms_of_1941

            This is just me being pedantic and knowing my subject area – I like books and articles that contain sources – it means you can check them and not take the authors views at face value.

            Comment by srebrenica — January 21, 2016 @ 8:44 am

      • Um, Diane you are replying to the wrong person. JETT RUCKER is a well known Holocaust denier. He writes for Inconvenient Histories. Jeff K. Is the exact opposite.
        The Chinese Communists are notorious for executing people and then sending a bill for the bullet.
        Am I also Chinese, as well as an Irish Jew?
        In defense of Rucker, he was being ironic.
        Diane, you have a severe case of what I call JOBS (Jews on the Brain Syndrome). This comes from watching too many of Jim’s videos.
        My cure:
        Take a break. Spend some time knitting, or reading a book. But not one of the Holocaust Handbooks. I suggest something light. I don’t know your reading tastes but perhaps a nice historical novel, like Shogun. It’s nice and long and will ease you.
        I read Shogun in the 5th grade. I highly recommend it.
        Jeff the Irish Jew

        Comment by Jeff K. — January 20, 2016 @ 5:22 pm

        • Jett sounds like good people, but Jeff, I was talking to you.

          I’ve read Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, INSIDE The Third Reich, Spandau Letters, THE MYTH OF GERMAN VILLAINY, The Bad War, Ingrid Rimland-Zundel’s LEBENSRAUM trilogy, DID SIX MILLION REALLY DIE (and then fiction) Winds of War, War and Remembrance, to name but a few. Don’t be such a condescending prick. Like the other stooges in your collective, you don’t know what you’re talking about assuming knowledge of me you don’t have, my habits, reading or otherwise – so in your ignorance, you merely assume.

          For your information, and MARK THIS DOWN that if I acquired JOBS by watching Jim’s videos, my only regret is that I haven’t seen MORE of his videos —- but that is a work in progress. And JOBS will be gladly terminal for me.

          Comment by Diane King — January 20, 2016 @ 6:25 pm

          • Oh, thank God, I discovered the root of your problem.
            You read the Bad War by MS King.
            That explains a lot.
            Wow, you poor woman. I am so sorry.
            I was properly armed against the silly bullshit espoused by King in his craptastic magnum opus but you stood no chance. I am deeply sorry and I will endeavor to go easier on you in the future.
            Jeff the Irish-Chinese-Communist Jew

            Comment by Jeff K. — January 21, 2016 @ 7:04 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: