Scrapbookpages Blog

March 10, 2016

Robert Jan van Pelt proves the use of gas chambers in the Holocaust — again!

Robert Jan van Pelt is back in the news. You can read the news about him here: http://www.cbc.ca/radio/q/schedule-for-wednesday-march-2-2015-1.3472195/chilling-exhibit-the-evidence-room-recreates-a-nazi-gas-chamber-1.3472244

Peephole in the door of a gas chamber

Robert Jan Van Pelt claims this is a photo of a peephole in the door of a homicidal gas chamber at Auschwitz

The quote is from the news article:

Begin quote

Professor and Holocaust expert Robert Jan van Pelt was one of her [Deborah Lipstadt’s] key witnesses [in David Irving’s lawsuit against Lipstadt for libel.]

He’s [Robert Jan van Pelt] now heading one of Canada’s contributions to the upcoming Venice Architecture Biennale, and it emerges directly from the Irving case.

[…]

The Evidence Room was the combined effort of a team of students and faculty of the University of Waterloo School of Architecture headed by Anne Bordeleau, Sascha Hastings, Donald McKay, and [Robert Jan] van Pelt.

It features life-sized replicas and casts of key pieces described in his [Robert Jan van Pelt’s] testimony about Auschwitz, including a gas column, gas door, a section of wall with a gas-tight hatch and other items that definitively proved the site was a factory of death.

End quote

I have never seen this alleged photograph of a gas chamber peephole before, even though I have studied the Holocaust extensively.

Peephole in Dachau gas chamber

My photo of the alleged peephole in the Dachau gas chamber

The alleged gas chamber in the Auschwitz main camp had a peephole, which was installed in the outside door into the room when it was turned into a bomb shelter for the SS men. I believe that the so-called gas chamber in the Auschwitz main camp was actually a morgue where bodies were stored before they were burned in the ovens in the room next door.

Air Raid shelter door has a peephole

Air Raid shelter door peephole in the alleged Auschwitz gas chamber

The peep hole, shown in the photo above, was for the German SS men to look out, after a bombing raid, to see if it was safe to come out of the Auschwitz “gas chamber” after a bombing raid.

Ovens in Auschwitz crematorium were right next to the alleged gas chamber

Ovens in Auschwitz crematorium were right next to the alleged gas chamber

My 1998 photo, shown above, illustrates that the alleged gas chamber in the Auschwitz main camp was right next to the cremation ovens, which would have caused an explosion if this was actually a gas chamber.

56 Comments »

  1. “I had never heard of Richard Green before I read your comment. I did a search and found information about him at https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=7664

    I’m sorry, I will never take anything I see on CODOH seriously.
    As for the rest, cyanide dissipates rapidly in the open air.
    Zyclon B was commonly used to fumigate buildings, ships, etc. While I’m sure that it was dangerous to stand next to a window or door just opened, it certainly didn’t kill everyone on the block or in the shipyard.
    The need for secrecy led to the decision to place the additional gas chambers in Birkenau.
    Jeff

    Comment by Jeff K. — March 12, 2016 @ 8:24 am

  2. Great pics of FG thanks. I think what makes thid story not eorkable is the fact that people think that it’s easy to gass people in a room is probably one of the hardest things to do but yet they make it look like just sprinkling some pellets over them and those pellets are going to disperse gas on the people and the die. Doesn’t work that way this is very complex situation here and there is a lot of things that have to go into making this work right and you just don’t throw pellets into a room on top of people’s heads especially in a room that has no heat in it no fans in it no way to circulate the gas which is most likely the most important thing you have to do the gas has to be circulated to get around each person did people think it’s just an easy thing it happens all by itself and then in 10 minutes these people the dead and then in 10 minutes the place is cleaned up to start over again sorry folks doesn’t work that way maybe in Hollywood but not in real life. The room can only handle 100 people comfortably and that would be a good amount of people have in it if you were going to gass people. But they claim 350 people or more were gassed in this room ridiculous.
    It is very obvious that this room was never used as a homicidal gas chamber or any type of gas chamber.
    It did make an ice bomb shelter though.

    Comment by jrizoli — March 11, 2016 @ 2:15 pm

    • I can’t remember if this number is correct or not. I read that the Krauts could run 2,000 people through the gas house,at a time. I was always a bit suspicious of that number. I found a formula as to how to figure the number of people a room could hold. This formula is used to figure out how many people a room can hold comfortably for a party. Yes I know this was no party here that we’re talking about. You take the number of square feet in a room and divide it by 5 . Five square feet being the room each individual needs for comfort. You said the gas house had a square footage of,844 square feet. Divide that by 5 and you get 164 people that you can fit in that area. Now,I know the Krauts ain’t gonna give a shit about a persons ” comfort “,therefore they’re gonna cram as many people in there they can. Even if you cut the number Down to one square foot each prisoner was given in the gas house,there’s still no way,you can get 2000 bodies in there. So loosely based on the formula I just mentioned,how many Jews could really fit in the gas room at once?

      Comment by Tim — March 11, 2016 @ 2:49 pm

      • The so-called Auschwitz gas chambers were actually crematoriums (morgues) which could hold a maximum of 2,000 dead bodies with the bodies piled up high. The bodies were removed from the morgues and burned a few at a time in the ovens. The bodies could not be piled higher than a man could reach up to pull the body off the pile.

        Comment by furtherglory — March 11, 2016 @ 3:56 pm

        • So the “2,000” number has nothing to do with an actual gas chamber. I ask because I read somewhere that it was said they could gas 2,000 people at a time . So if they couldn’t get 2,000 at a time and having to let the place air out before they run the next group through,it seems like their production numbers would be cut quite a bit. What would’ve been a realistic number of bodies they could turn out in a 24 hour period if they run everything 24/7.

          Comment by Tim — March 12, 2016 @ 6:41 am

  3. Gas chambers??? Don’t think so!
    From theThe Leuchter report
    JR
    Krema I has been reconstructed for the time period from September 25, 1941 through September 21, 1944. It shows a morgue of some 7680 cu. ft. with two doorways, neither door opening externally. One doorway opened into the crematory and the other into the washroom. Apparently neither opening had a door, but this was not verifiable since one wall had
    been removed and one opening had been moved.  It should be noted that the
    official Auschwitz State Museum guidebook says that the building physically remains in the same condition as it was on liberation day on January 27,
    1945.
    There are 4 roof vents and 1 heater flue in the morgue area. The flue is
    open, showing no evidence of ever having been closed. The roof vents were
    not gasketed and new wood indicated they had recently been rebuilt. The
    walls and ceiling are stucco and the floor is poured concrete. The floor area is
    844 sq. ft. The ceiling is beamed, and on the floor one can see where the air
    raid shelter walls were removed. The lighting was not, and is not now, ex-
    plosion-proof. There are floor drains in the floor of the chamber which connect into the main camp drain and sewer system. Assuming a 9 sq. ft. area per
    person to allow for gas circulation, which is nevertheless very tight, a maximum of 94 people could fit into this room at one time. It has been reported
    that this room could hold up to 600 persons.
    The alleged execution gas chamber is, as stated earlier, not designed to be
    used in such a manner. There is no evidence of an exhaust system or fan of
    any type in this structure.consisted simply of four (4)
    square roof vents exhausting
    less than two (2) feet from the
    surface of the roof.
    Ventilating HCN gas in this
    manner would undoubtedly result in the poison gas reaching the confines of
    the SS hospital a short distance across the road, with patients and support per-
    sonnel being killed. Because of the fact that the building has no sealant to
    prevent leakage, no gasketed doors to prevent gas reaching the crematory,
    drains that would permit gas to reach every building in the camp, no heating
    system, no circulatory system, no exhaust system or venting stack,no gas
    distribution system, constant dampness, no circulation due to the number of
    people in the chamber, and no way of satisfactorily introducing the Zyklon B
    material, it would be sheer suicide to attempt to utilize this morgue as an exe-
    cution gas chamber. The results would be an explosion or leaks gassing the
    entire camp.
    Further, if the chamber were used thus (based on DEGESCH figures of 4 oz.
    or 0.25 lbs. per 100 cu. ft.), 30.4 oz. or 1.9 lbs. of Zyklon B gas (gross weight
    of Zyklon B is three times that of Zyklon B gas; all figures are for Zyklon b
    gas only) would be used each time for 16 hours at 41 degrees Fahrenheit
    (based on German government fumigation figures). Ventilation must take at Least 20 hours and tests must be made to determine if the chamber is safe. It is doubtful whether the gas would clear in a week without an exhaust system.
    This clearly is contradictory of the chamber’s alleged usage of several gas-
    sings per day.

    3.16. Birkenau – Kremas II, III, IV and V
    A detailed study of these Kremas resulted in the following information.
    Kremas II and III were mirror image installations consisting of several
    morgues and a crematory of 15 retorts each. The morgues were in the base-
    ment and the crematories on the ground floor. An elevator was utilized for
    corpse transport from the morgues to the crematory. The included drawings
    were generated from original blueprints obtained at the Auschwitz State Mueum.and observations made and measurements taken on
    location. Construction was of
    brick, mortar and concrete.
    The investigated areas were
    the alleged gas chambers
    designated as morgue #1 on
    both drawings. As noted for
    Krema I, there was no venti-
    lation, no heating system, no circulation system, no sealant inside or out and
    further, no doors on the morgues in Krema II.138 The area has been examined
    by the author and no evidence of doors or door frames has been found. This
    investigator could not make this determination for Krema III since portions of
    the structure are missing. Both structures had roofs of reinforced concrete
    without any apparent openings. Further, reports of hollow gas-carrying columns are not true. All the columns are solid, reinforced concrete exactly as
    indicated in the captured German plans. The roof vents are not gasketed.
    These facilities would be very dangerous if used as gas chambers and this use
    would probably result in the death of the users and an explosion when the gas
    reached the crematory. Each facility had a corpse elevator of 2.1 meters x
    1.35 meters. Clearly, this elevator was large enough for only one (1) body and
    an attendant.
    The alleged gas chamber in each of Kremas II and III had an area of 2500
    sq. ft. This would accommodate 278 people based on the 9 square foot theo-
    ry. If the chamber were filled with the required HCN gas (0.25 lbs./1000 cu.
    ft.), and assuming a ceiling height of 8 feet and 20,000 cubic feet of space,
    then 5 lbs. of Zyklon B gas would be required.144 Again, assume at least oneweek to vent (as at Krema I). This ventilation time is again doubtful, but will
    serve to compute our numbers.
    Computed usage rates for Kremas II and III (theoretical and real-time) and
    alleged execution gas chamber at maximum capacity are set out in Table 5.
    Kremas IV and V were mirror image installations consisting of crematories
    of two furnaces with 4 retorts each and numerous rooms utilized as mortuar-
    ies, offices and storage. The interior rooms did not conform to the mirror im-
    age.  Some of these rooms were allegedly used as gas chambers. It is impos- sible to ascertain much from the physical sites since the buildings were razed long ago. No sealant was found anywhere on the foundation or floor. According to reports, Zyklon B gas pellets were allegedly thrown through wall ports which are now non-existent. If the plans of the building are correct, these facilities likewise were not gas chambers, for the same reasons iterated earlier for Kremas I, II, and III.
    Construction was apparently
    red brick and mortar with a
    concrete floor and no basement. It should be noted that
    the existence of cremation
    and execution facilities at
    Kremas IV and V is unsubstantiated.
    Based upon statistics ob-
    tained from the Auschwitz State Museum and measurements made at the site for Kremas IV and V relative to the alleged gas areas, and assuming a ceiling height of 8 feet, the computed statistics are as follows:
    Krema IV
    1875 sq. ft.; will hold 209 people. 15,000 cu. ft. will use 3.75 lbs. of Zyklon
    B gas at 0.25 lbs./1000 cu. ft.
    Krema V
    5125 sq. ft.; will hold 570 people. 41,000 cu. ft. will use 10.25 lbs. of
    Zyklon B gas at 0.25 lbs./1000 cu. ft.
    Computed alleged usage rates for Kremas IV and V (theoretical and real-
    time) and gas chamber at maximum capacity and 1 week ventilation time are
    set out in Table 6
    The Red and White houses, otherwise designated as Bunker I and II, were
    alleged to be gas chambers only, and there are no estimates available or statistics on the buildings.

    Comment by jrizoli — March 11, 2016 @ 12:37 pm

    • This quote is from the Leuchter report: “There are floor drains in the floor of the chamber which connect into the main camp drain and sewer system.”

      At the time that Fred Leuchter wrote this, tourists were being told that the area of the washroom was included in the gas chamber, which it was not. I explained this on this page of my website: http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/Tour/Auschwitz1/Auschwitz08C.html

      When I visited the Auschwitz gas chamber in 1998, tourists were being told that the area of the washroom was part of the gas chamber. As I understand it, tourists are now escorted into the gas chamber through the oven room and they are NOT told that the area of the washroom was part of the gas chamber.

      Comment by furtherglory — March 11, 2016 @ 1:39 pm

    • “Gas chambers??? Don’t think so!
      From theThe Leuchter report
      JR
      Krema I has been reconstructed for the time period from September 25, 1941 through September 21, 1944. It shows a morgue of some 7680 cu. ft. with two doorways, neither door opening externally. One doorway opened into the crematory and the other into the washroom. Apparently neither opening had a door, but this was not verifiable since one wall had
      been removed and one opening had been moved. It should be noted that the
      official Auschwitz State Museum guidebook says that the building physically remains in the same condition as it was on liberation day on January 27,
      1945.”

      Yet deniers smugly proclaim to the world that Krema I is a reconstruction.
      Which we’ve known since the 70’s.

      There are 4 roof vents and 1 heater flue in the morgue area. The flue is
      open, showing no evidence of ever having been closed. The roof vents were
      not gasketed and new wood indicated they had recently been rebuilt.”

      The key word is “rebuilt.”

      The walls and ceiling are stucco and the floor is poured concrete. The floor area is
      844 sq. ft. The ceiling is beamed, and on the floor one can see where the air
      raid shelter walls were removed. The lighting was not, and is not now, ex-
      plosion-proof. There are floor drains in the floor of the chamber which connect into the main camp drain and sewer system. Assuming a 9 sq. ft. area per
      person to allow for gas circulation, which is nevertheless very tight,”

      Utterly ridiculous.
      As I and others have states repeatedly, cyanide is lighter than air and doesn’t require that type of space for circulation.
      Jim, the Germans used Zyclon B to fumigate clothing. Did each piece of clothing need 9 square feet of space to insure circulation?

      “a maximum of 94 people could fit into this room at one time. It has been reported
      that this room could hold up to 600 persons.”

      If you consider four people in a square foot, which is perfectly doable, 600 people in the room would fit.

      “The alleged execution gas chamber is, as stated earlier, not designed to be
      used in such a manner. There is no evidence of an exhaust system or fan of
      any type in this structure.consisted simply of four (4)
      square roof vents exhausting
      less than two (2) feet from the
      surface of the roof.”

      The Germans improvised, there were no purpose built gas chambers until 1943.

      “Ventilating HCN gas in this
      manner would undoubtedly result in the poison gas reaching the confines of
      the SS hospital a short distance across the road, with patients and support per-
      sonnel being killed.”

      Forgive me, Jim.
      😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
      Cyanide disapates rapidly in the open air.
      People used Zyclon B to fumigate orchards, ships, buildings, homes, etc.
      Are you saying that if I fumigated my office building once I opened the windows it would kill everyone on my block?

      “Because of the fact that the building has no sealant to
      prevent leakage, no gasketed doors to prevent gas reaching the crematory,
      drains that would permit gas to reach every building in the camp, no heating
      system, no circulatory system, no exhaust system or venting stack,no gas
      distribution system, constant dampness, no circulation due to the number of
      people in the chamber, and no way of satisfactorily introducing the Zyklon B
      material, it would be sheer suicide to attempt to utilize this morgue as an exe-
      cution gas chamber. The results would be an explosion or leaks gassing the
      entire camp.”

      Forgive me again, Jim.
      😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅
      Drains have “S” shaped pipe to prevent that sort of thing from happening.
      Do the ordinary fumigation rooms built at Auschwitz have anything you’ve described, circulation systems, stacks for venting, gas distribution systems, etc., etc.,? To me those buildings always looked rather primitive. Wouldn’t it be cost prohibitive to do that for every gassing building in the camp?
      As for the danger of explosion…..😆😆😆😆😆😆😆
      Repeatedly, the risk of explosion from cyanide is very low.

      “Further, if the chamber were used thus (based on DEGESCH figures of 4 oz.
      or 0.25 lbs. per 100 cu. ft.), 30.4 oz. or 1.9 lbs. of Zyklon B gas (gross weight
      of Zyklon B is three times that of Zyklon B gas; all figures are for Zyklon b
      gas only) would be used each time for 16 hours at 41 degrees Fahrenheit
      (based on German government fumigation figures). Ventilation must take at Least 20 hours and tests must be made to determine if the chamber is safe. It is doubtful whether the gas would clear in a week without an exhaust system.”

      A lot of blah blah.
      It takes much less time to ventilate a barren, concrete room than a fully furnished home.

      “This clearly is contradictory of the chamber’s alleged usage of several gas-
      sings per day.

      3.16. Birkenau – Kremas II, III, IV and V
      A detailed study of these Kremas resulted in the following information.
      Kremas II and III were mirror image installations consisting of several
      morgues and a crematory of 15 retorts each. The morgues were in the base-
      ment and the crematories on the ground floor. An elevator was utilized for
      corpse transport from the morgues to the crematory. The included drawings
      were generated from original blueprints obtained at the Auschwitz State Mueum.and observations made and measurements taken on
      location. Construction was of
      brick, mortar and concrete.
      The investigated areas were
      the alleged gas chambers
      designated as morgue #1 on
      both drawings. As noted for
      Krema I, there was no venti-
      lation, no heating system, no circulation system, no sealant inside or out and
      further, no doors on the morgues in Krema II.138”

      That’s a lot of information to be gleaned from blasted hulks.
      The last gassings at Auschwitz occurred in the fall of 1944. The Germans dismantled and hauled away the parts you described.
      Van Pelt in the documentary “Auschwitz: Blue Prints of Genocide” clearly shows where the ventilation systems were.
      The heating systems are detailed in the blue prints.

      “The area has been examined
      by the author and no evidence of doors or door frames has been found.”

      Then how did anyone get in? Did the Germans build structures without doors?
      That’s an odd thing to do.

      “This investigator could not make this determination for Krema III since portions of
      the structure are missing. Both structures had roofs of reinforced concrete
      without any apparent openings. Further, reports of hollow gas-carrying columns are not true. All the columns are solid, reinforced concrete exactly as
      indicated in the captured German plans. The roof vents are not gasketed.”

      Again, the Germans dismantled and hauled away anything they could.

      “These facilities would be very dangerous if used as gas chambers and this use
      would probably result in the death of the users and an explosion when the gas
      reached the crematory.”

      Is Zyclon B radioactive as well?
      It sounds the most dangerous substance on earth.

      “Each facility had a corpse elevator of 2.1 meters x
      1.35 meters. Clearly, this elevator was large enough for only one (1) body and
      an attendant.
      The alleged gas chamber in each of Kremas II and III had an area of 2500
      sq. ft.”

      Ok. That sounds right.

      “This would accommodate 278 people based on the 9 square foot theo-
      ry.”

      😆😆😆😆😆😅😅😅😅😅😅😆😆😆😆😆😂😂😂

      ” If the chamber were filled with the required HCN gas (0.25 lbs./1000 cu.
      ft.), and assuming a ceiling height of 8 feet and 20,000 cubic feet of space,
      then 5 lbs. of Zyklon B gas would be required.144 Again, assume at least oneweek to vent (as at Krema I). This ventilation time is again doubtful, but will
      serve to compute our numbers.
      Computed usage rates for Kremas II and III (theoretical and real-time) and
      alleged execution gas chamber at maximum capacity are set out in Table 5.
      Kremas IV and V were mirror image installations consisting of crematories
      of two furnaces with 4 retorts each and numerous rooms utilized as mortuar-
      ies, offices and storage. The interior rooms did not conform to the mirror im-
      age. Some of these rooms were allegedly used as gas chambers. It is impos- sible to ascertain much from the physical sites since the buildings were razed long ago. No sealant was found anywhere on the foundation or floor. According to reports, Zyklon B gas pellets were allegedly thrown through wall ports which are now non-existent. If the plans of the building are correct, these facilities likewise were not gas chambers, for the same reasons iterated earlier for Kremas I, II, and III.
      Construction was apparently
      red brick and mortar with a
      concrete floor and no basement. It should be noted that
      the existence of cremation
      and execution facilities at
      Kremas IV and V is unsubstantiated.
      Based upon statistics ob-
      tained from the Auschwitz State Museum and measurements made at the site for Kremas IV and V relative to the alleged gas areas, and assuming a ceiling height of 8 feet, the computed statistics are as follows:
      Krema IV
      1875 sq. ft.; will hold 209 people. 15,000 cu. ft. will use 3.75 lbs. of Zyklon
      B gas at 0.25 lbs./1000 cu. ft.
      Krema V
      5125 sq. ft.; will hold 570 people. 41,000 cu. ft. will use 10.25 lbs. of
      Zyklon B gas at 0.25 lbs./1000 cu. ft.
      Computed alleged usage rates for Kremas IV and V (theoretical and real-
      time) and gas chamber at maximum capacity and 1 week ventilation time are
      set out in Table 6
      The Red and White houses, otherwise designated as Bunker I and II, were
      alleged to be gas chambers only, and there are no estimates available or statistics on the buildings.”

      Wow.
      Tell me again, why is this guy considered an expert?

      Comment by Jeff K. — March 11, 2016 @ 1:49 pm

      • I climbed up on the roof of the Auschwitz I gas chamber and took photos, which I put on my website at http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/Tour/Auschwitz1/Auschwitz08A.html

        Comment by furtherglory — March 11, 2016 @ 2:00 pm

        • I read your “Auschwitz Scrapbook Tour” webpage, and you produce an extract from page 363 of the book “Auschwitz 1270 to the Present,” by Van Pelt and Dwork. They state the following information regarding the gas chamber reconstruction of Krema I:

          “When Auschwitz was transformed into a museum after the war, the decision was taken to concentrate the history of the whole complex into one of its component parts. The infamous crematoria where the mass murders had taken place lay in ruins in Birkenau, two miles away. The committee felt that a crematorium was required at the end of the memorial journey, and crematorium I was reconstructed to speak for the history of the incinerators at Birkenau. This program of usurpation was rather detailed. A chimney, the ultimate symbol of Birkenau, was re-created; four hatched openings in the roof, as if for pouring Zyklon B into the gas chamber below, were installed, and two of the three furnaces were rebuilt using original parts. There are no signs to explain these restitutions, they were not marked at the time, and the guides remain silent about it when they take visitors through this building that is presumed by the tourist to be the place where it happened.”

          So what this pair of holocaust proponents are admitting, is that Krema I is not genuine at all; that the Auschwitz authorities have been deceiving the public ever since the end of the war. And I do like their wonderfully coy statement;- “This program of usurpation was rather detailed”. In layman’s language this can be translated as;- ” a hell of lot of fakery was going on!”

          Comment by Talbot — March 11, 2016 @ 2:59 pm

    • “The Red and White houses, otherwise designated as Bunker I and II, were
      alleged to be gas chambers only, and there are no estimates available or statistics on the buildings.”

      The Leuchter Report sums these two facilities up very well indeed. It is difficult to prove that the buildings ever existed – let alone were used as homicidal gas chambers. And where the Auschwitz Memorial-Museum states that the “Red House” actually stood, there is nothing more than empty field of grass today. There are some bricks and rubble at the site of the alleged “White House”, but it is not too difficult to see that this material has been dumped there at a later date, and made into a piece of theatre to suggest the foundations of a small four-roomed building.

      Comment by Talbot — March 11, 2016 @ 2:13 pm

  4. Here you go, Tim:

    https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/mobile/en/article.php?ModuleId=10008193

    You can find other numbers but those are pretty close.

    Stalin didn’t lose a war so there was no one to put him on trial.
    The numbers on deaths in the USSR during Stalin’s reign are all over the place. I’ll see if I can find something.
    Jeff

    Comment by Jeff K. — March 11, 2016 @ 7:07 am

  5. Is there anything out there that has the number of deaths at each camp? Yeah I know there are never accurate numbers,I just want want to get an idea of the total numbers. I don’t care if an individual stepped off in a chuckhole and broke their neck. Throw that death in there . I hear some people say this prison was a death camp. Another person would say,”no it wasn’t “. The Jews can’t make up their minds at all. 6,4,3 and finally 1.5 mill. Either way you look at it,they’re amateurs compared to “Papa Joe”(Stalin). They estimate he killed 10 mill on the low side and 20 plus mill on the high side. How many of those folks were Jews ? Well known fact he hated Jews too. How come he’s never had his ass drug into court?

    Comment by Tim — March 11, 2016 @ 5:00 am

  6. Even if they were right next to each other, if they were not in use simultaneously, and the gas dissipated (was it even a combustable gas?), there would be no explosions.

    Also, “homicidal” is the frame of mind, so an inanimate object cannot be “homicidal.” I believe you mean “used for homicide.”

    Comment by Halli — March 10, 2016 @ 11:29 am

    • I have checked this out in several different dictionaries online and you are correct. However, the term “homicidal gas chamber” is used to distinguish between a gas chamber “used for homicide” and a gas chamber used to disinfect clothes. When the Americans first arrived at Dachau, they thought that the four “disinfection gas chambers” were used to gas the prisoners in the camp.

      Comment by furtherglory — March 10, 2016 @ 11:54 am

    • Zyclon B is combustible but at a very high rate, I believe 56,000 PPM.
      This is a much higher rate than is fatal to humans, 300 PPM is fatal to human beings.
      16,000 PPM is recommended for insects, this is still much lower than the explosion rate.

      Jeff

      Comment by Jeff K. — March 10, 2016 @ 12:31 pm

      • rate

        Is there no end to your stupidity? — concentration, not “rate”.

        Zyklon-B was a trademark — it was the name of a product — the product was marketed as an insecticide (which is how it was used) — it consisted of a kind of inert medium, formed into pellets, and impregnated with hydrogen cyanide — so I doubt that Zyklon-B, the product, was (easily) combustible — hydrogen cyanide gas is, and can be explosive under certain conditions, including a sufficient concentration.

        explosion rate

        Man, your stupidity is really unbelievable — that’s one of the more idiotic sentences I’ve seen in a while.

        Comment by eah — March 12, 2016 @ 12:32 am

        • rate

          “Is there no end to your stupidity? — concentration, not “rate”.”

          Maybe you ought to change your initials to OCD instead of eah.

          “Zyklon-B was a trademark — it was the name of a product — the product was marketed as an insecticide (which is how it was used) — it consisted of a kind of inert medium, formed into pellets, and impregnated with hydrogen cyanide — so I doubt that Zyklon-B, the product, was (easily) combustible”

          Gee, thanks for the lesson, Nancy.

          “hydrogen cyanide gas is, and can be explosive under certain conditions, including a sufficient concentration.”

          But not at the level required to cause death in humans. So, denier/Leuchter fail.

          explosion rate

          “Man, your stupidity is really unbelievable — that’s one of the more idiotic sentences I’ve seen in a while.”

          I’m glad you appreciate it, Nancy.
          Tell me, are you this insufferable in person?
          Or, are you just unbearable on line?

          Best regards,
          Jeff

          Comment by Jeff K. — March 12, 2016 @ 8:14 am

    • There “would be no explosions” unless the concentration of HCN was above about 6%. Furtherglory needs to get this into her head (and everyone else with this uninformed opinion). Homicidal gassings COULD have been done well below a 6% concentration of HCN. And if they were done, they WOULD have been done under 6% concentration HCN. There could have been a flamethrower in there blazing away and there would have been no explosion.

      Random rooms and buildings were fumigated with Zyklon-B quite frequently. The concentration of HCN needed to kill people would not need to be more than that needed in a regular fumigation. The procedure Germans wrote up for these fumigations which Faurisson likes to cite so much specifically emphasizes that the concentrations used are NOT EXPLOSIVE (in bold letters in the document). You can read this document yourself on Faurisson’s blog at:

      http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.com/2015/07/a-document-among-others-stating.html

      He has links at the bottom for the German original as well as an English translation. On the first page of the English translation by the “X” mark is the pertinent statement of there not being any danger of explosion under typical application (well more than enough to kill people with – buit not to risk explosion):

      At the end of section II, right before section III of this procedure it says, “Zyklon can be made harmless by burning”:

      Zyklon-B is made harmless by burning it. And there is no danger of explosion in typical concentrations. This is what the German wartime procedure for fumigating buildings – which was bulk printed and handed out to all places where Zyklon-B fumigations were performed – said explicitly and emphatically in a way that anyone should easily understand. If furtherglory thinks she knows more than the persons who wrote this procedure, she is a fool. Faurisson has clearly and undeniably misrepresented this text. The Zyklon-B explosive argument is DEAD with this document. Only a fool or fraudster would continue to use it.

      Comment by blake121666 — March 10, 2016 @ 1:54 pm

  7. Van Pelt must be hallucinating again….there were NO homicidal gas chambers and any good researcher knows it.
    Just more B/S to keep the HoloHoax tale going.

    JR

    Comment by jrizoli — March 10, 2016 @ 10:27 am

    • Mr Van Pelt is indeed a discredited gentleman, because he was saying just a few weeks ago that only 1% of the holocaust can be proved by any investigations or factual information. He said that we have to rely almost entirely on the testimonies of so-called “survivors”.

      But previously, he had the sheer nerve to produce a 430 page-plus report to the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial suggesting that he had huge amounts of scientific and technical information proving the existence of gas chambers at Auschwitz.

      I’m afraid Mr Van Pelt’s reputation is now in tatters – fancy going along to a court of law, where people’s livelihoods and reputations are at stake, and submitting a report, but then after the trial is over, admitting that that the overwhelming content of this report is crap.

      Comment by Talbot — March 10, 2016 @ 11:33 am

      • I get a kick when people say to me there are millions of documents and hundreds, even thousands of people that can prove the HoloHoax occurred…..
        Ok I’m with you…… how about showing me one real (not forged) document and one real live witnesses ( second and third hand) or no hand (hallucinating wackos) that have copied their HoloHoax Horror stories and now call them their own.
        Pretty funny when you think of it.
        Now lets look at us “Holocaust Deniers) how many forgeries of documents exist on our end? How many liars trying to make a story that doesn’t exist.
        None!

        JR

        Comment by jrizoli — March 10, 2016 @ 11:49 am

      • “Mr Van Pelt is indeed a discredited gentleman, because he was saying just a few weeks ago that only 1% of the holocaust can be proved by any investigations or factual information. He said that we have to rely almost entirely on the testimonies of so-called “survivors”.”

        Where and when did he say this?
        Where is the article with this quote?
        Can you provide a link?

        “But previously, he had the sheer nerve to produce a 430 page-plus report to the Irving-Lipstadt libel trial suggesting that he had huge amounts of scientific and technical information proving the existence of gas chambers at Auschwitz.”

        Well, he’s certainly more qualified than Fred Leuchter to make that determination.
        Van Pelt is an architect.

        “I’m afraid Mr Van Pelt’s reputation is now in tatters – fancy going along to a court of law, where people’s livelihoods and reputations are at stake, and submitting a report, but then after the trial is over, admitting that that the overwhelming content of this report is crap.”

        That’s funny, from what I can tell he’s a well respected historical architect.
        Where did he admit the report was “crap?”
        Do you have a link? A copy of the article?

        Jeff

        Comment by Jeff K. — March 10, 2016 @ 12:27 pm

        • Well, he’s certainly more qualified than Fred Leuchter to make that determination. Van Pelt is an architect.

          I’ve ignored it in the past, but not this time — as implied, this is not the first time you’ve posted this ridiculous falsehood about van Pelt (and at the same time denigrated Leuchter) — van Pelt is not an architecthere is a link to his faculty page on web site of the Univ of Waterloo — there it clearly says he is a “D.Litt” — this is informally known as a ‘doctor of letters’ — Wikipedia puts it this way: It is awarded in many countries by universities and learned bodies in recognition of achievement in the humanities, original contribution to the creative arts or scholarship and other merits — that ought to be clear enough — in case it isn’t: he is a scholar in the humanities, someone has managed to sell himself as an architectural historian — ie he teaches about the aesthetic history of architecture — to repeat: he is not an architect, an engineer, or a technical person of any kind — he has never designed a goddamn building in his life — I seriously doubt he has ever designed anything — here you can search the Winter, 2016 class schedule for the Univ of Waterloo — if you search under ARCH, you see that he is teaching only one course — the description of this course is “Ancient World & Fnds of Europe”, where “Fnds” is probably Foundations — if you enrolled in this course, you would probably find that he spends a lot of time showing slides of representative buildings, at the same time discussing their aesthetics, and how this changed over time.

          Here you can find him on the Wikipedia page of ‘Dutch Historians’ — perhaps he originally studied history.

          Here is the Wikipedia page on ‘Dutch Architects born in the 20th century’ — he isn’t listed because he isn’t an architect.

          You are the stupidest, most asinine poseur I’ve ever encountered on the internet.

          Comment by eah — March 10, 2016 @ 1:14 pm

          • “I’ve ignored it in the past, but not this time — as implied, this is not the first time you’ve posted this ridiculous falsehood about van Pelt (and at the same time denigrated Leuchter) — van Pelt is not an architect”

            What? I’ve said that Leuchter is probably a wonderful man and might be a great dancer.

            He’s still not qualified to make a determination on gas chambers.

            No one can come up with a gas chamber he built, or designed and had built.

            From what I can tell he worked on lethal injection devices and electric chairs. They have nothing to do with gas chambers.

            It’s disputed whether or not he even serviced gas chambers.

            To top it off, it’s ridiculous to compare modern gas chambers designed to execute one person, versus Nazi gas chambers designed to execute hundreds. Or thousands.

            The court felt that Van Pelt was qualified to write a report, whereas the Judge in Zundel’s trial only allowed Leuchter to speak as a witness, in other words like someone’s Aunt Ethel who visited Auschwitz.

            Leuchter, unlike Pressac and Van Pelt, never consulted the historical documents available at Auschwitz. He bungled his samples by not telling the company he gave them to for analysis. Consequently the company crushed them, diluting the samples….but even then found traces of cyanide (the owner of the company stated that this was the wrong test to use to find cyanide).
            Leuchter never took control samples from the barracks to compare. Later tests by the Poles did so and found no trace of cyanide in barracks fumigated by Zyclon B. They did find them in the gas chambers…..just like Leuchter did.

            Aaaaaawwwww, I hope I didn’t denigrate Leuchter TOO MUCH for you. I don’t want to send you into another shit fit like a 13 year old girl who just saw her best friend kiss a boy she likes.

            Make sure to put that in your diary, Nancy.

            Sincerely,
            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — March 10, 2016 @ 1:41 pm

            • Fuck off you POS.

              Comment by eah — March 10, 2016 @ 1:42 pm

              • “Fuck off you POS.”

                What? Is it something I said?

                Best regards,
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — March 10, 2016 @ 2:02 pm

            • As usual, you do not have the guts to admit your falsehood — you have, on a number of occasions, found Leuchter’s qualifications inferior to van Pelt’s because ‘van Pelt is an architect’ — which I’ve just shown is total bullshit — but rather than admit it was total bullshit, you instead ramble on with more bullshit, mostly designed to denigrate Leuchter professionally — even though in the past I’ve provided examples of highly qualified technical people who’ve looked at the alleged gas chambers at A-B, and come to the came conclusion as Leuchter.

              Like I said: you are a real piece of shit.

              Comment by eah — March 10, 2016 @ 1:47 pm

              • “As usual, you do not have the guts to admit your falsehood — you have, on a number of occasions, found Leuchter’s qualifications inferior to van Pelt’s because ‘van Pelt is an architect’ —”

                No, I’ve found Leuchter’s qualifications inferior long before I mentioned Van Pelt.

                I’ve mentioned before the mistakes he made. They had nothing to do with Van Pelt.

                “”which I’ve just shown is total bullshit — but rather than admit it was total bullshit, you instead ramble on with more bullshit, mostly designed to denigrate Leuchter professionally”

                Was anything I said untrue?
                Has Leuchter built/designed a gas chamber I don’t know about?
                Did he consult the historical documents? Did he take control samples? Did he tell the company who did his tests what they were for?

                “— even though in the past I’ve provided examples of highly qualified technical people who’ve looked at the alleged gas chambers at A-B, and come to the came conclusion as Leuchter.”

                Who?

                “Like I said: you are a real piece of shit.”

                Aaaaaawwwwww, it’s so cute when you act up

                Regards,
                Jeff

                Comment by Jeff K. — March 10, 2016 @ 2:25 pm

                • Was anything I said untrue?

                  How about this: Van Pelt is an architect.

                  Like I said: you do not have the guts to admit your falsehood.

                  Fucking jerk.

                  Comment by eah — March 11, 2016 @ 2:52 pm

                • Who?

                  Walter Lüftl

                  Germar Rudolf, who has an advanced degree in Chemistry, is another.

                  Comment by eah — March 11, 2016 @ 3:13 pm

          • “You are the stupidest, most asinine poseur I’ve ever encountered on the internet.”

            I enjoy our conversations as well, eah.
            They are the highlight of my day.
            BTW, do you have any information about the Jews allegedly transited through the OR camps in 1942-1943?
            Or the Hungarian Jews transited through Birkenau in 1944?
            I realized I haven’t asked you yet.
            Bye.
            Oh, you never have gotten back to me about becoming friends on Facebook. Let me know.

            Sincerely, Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — March 10, 2016 @ 1:59 pm

        • Type in;- http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2009/12/27/a_case_for_letting_nature_take_back_auschwitz.html

          Paraphrasing – Van Pelt says that 99% of the holocaust cannot be proved by factual evidence.

          Comment by Talbot — March 10, 2016 @ 1:42 pm

          • Sorry, Talbot.

            I was playing with eah.

            I’ve read the article you posted. I’ve actually read it before.

            While I disagree with him on allowing Birkenau to fall to ruins he made some good points. It does not invalidate his report in any way, which was very detailed.

            Jeff

            Comment by Jeff K. — March 10, 2016 @ 2:32 pm

          • Van Pelt says that 99% of the holocaust cannot be proved by factual evidence.

            What is the 1% that ‘can be proved by factual evidence’?

            Comment by eah — March 11, 2016 @ 2:51 pm

            • Eah – I think Van Pelt is maybe referring to physical evidence on the ground. But if so, what has he got to go on? There is the “reconstructed” Krema 1 at Auschwitz; the ruins of Krema’s 2 & 3: as well as the foundations of Krema’s 4 & 5 at Birkenau. There is next to nothing available regarding Bunker’s 1 & 2 outside the perimeter of Birkenau; and no human remains have ever been found in or around the Auschwitz complex, let alone forensically examined.

              All that remains at Chelmno, is – I believe – the foundations of the castle or manor house, where the Jews are alleged to have been processed. There is no physical evidence of anything at Treblinka, and very little, if anything remains at either Sobibor or Belzec. The Holocaust proponents have more-or-less abandoned Maidanek as an extermination centre; and all the alleged massacre sites inside the occupied Soviet Union are so clouded in mystery and doubt, as to be practically useless as reliable evidence for mass murder.

              And as for any factual evidence – well what is there really? There are genuine German records describing transports of Jews and others to these camps, but otherwise the holocaust legend consists of either dubious, or outright forged documents, and the endless stories from all kinds of people whose testimonies cannot be relied upon at all.

              Van Pelt is, in my eyes, a discredited individual. His 430 plus page report should never have been submitted into a court of law. He describes himself as an architect and an architectural historian ( and I note, that you even question his qualifications in these fields). He is by no means qualified to compile a report about homicidal gas chambers and crematoria, because he has no credentials as a qualified chemist, a gas-flow engineer, or an expert on ventilation and heating systems, let alone any expertise in the cremation of human bodies.

              Comment by Talbot — March 11, 2016 @ 4:29 pm

              • Van Pelt is, in my eyes, a discredited individual.

                Why would you think that? — he can look into the matter, just as anyone can — clearly he put a lot of effort into it, and serious revisionists have paid attention — my complaint here has been that false statements were repeatedly made about van Pelt’s professional background, and these were used to compare him to Leuchter in a dishonest attempt to discredit Leuchter — the following simple-minded and dishonest proposition was made on this blog repeatedly: van Pelt, educated/trained as an architect, therefore qualified/believable; Leuchter, not educated as an engineer, therefore not credible/believable.

                Suggestion: look at what van Pelt says in the larger context of the alleged ‘gas chambers’ — then make up your mind about whether you think they were, or could have ever been used as, ‘gas chambers’ in the manner claimed.

                Comment by eah — March 11, 2016 @ 11:27 pm

            • “Was anything I said untrue?

              How about this: Van Pelt is an architect.

              Like I said: you do not have the guts to admit your falsehood.

              Fucking jerk.”

              “van Pelt obtained an undergraduate degree in art history and classical archaeology, a graduate degree in architectural history, and a PhD in the history of ideas. While pursuing his studies, he worked as an architectural historian, involved with the restoration of Noordeinde Palace in The Hague.[1]

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Jan_van_Pelt#Early_life_and_career

              I stand corrected.
              He’s an architectural historian…which means he still knows more about architecture than Leuchter.

              I’m sorry I hurt your feelings over Leuchter, Nancy.
              I know that gets your lady parts all a quiver.

              You can put that in your diary:

              “Dear Diary,”
              “Today Jeff apologized over my lady parts getting all a quiver.”

              So, Facebook?
              Yes or no?

              Your pal,
              Jeff

              Comment by Jeff K. — March 11, 2016 @ 8:47 pm

              • You did say advanced degree

                Uhh, yeah, I did — a strong focus on credentials is a hallmark of a small-minded person, not to mention a fucking jerk..

                In the past I’ve also said that anyone who works in a specific technical area knows that years of experience in that specific technical area is a lot more valuable than a formal education and no experience.

                You don’t need to copy/paste entire portions of comments by others — the crap you post here is spammy enough without trying to make it worse — and choose one of “Jeff” or “Jeff K” — both aren’t needed, i-d-i-o-t.

                Comment by eah — March 11, 2016 @ 11:39 pm

                • You did say advanced degree

                  “Uhh, yeah, I did — a strong focus on credentials is a hallmark of a small-minded person, not to mention a fucking jerk..”

                  It’s cute when you resort to swearing at me. I’ve compared it to a 13 year old girl having a temper tantrum because she just saw her best friend kiss a boy she likes.

                  “In the past I’ve also said that anyone who works in a specific technical area knows that years of experience in that specific technical area is a lot more valuable than a formal education and no experience.”

                  I don’t have a problem with Rudolf. He at least has the chemistry exprience to make a determination on cyanide in the gas chambers. Naturally his findings have been rebutted by another chemist, not to mention the series of tests by the Poles themselves.
                  It is deceptive of Rudolf to give himself the title of PhD when he uses pen names.

                  “You don’t need to copy/paste entire portions of comments by others — the crap you post here is spammy enough without trying to make it worse”

                  I’ll reply in the manner of my choosing, Nancy. I want to make sure that anyone who reads my replies can find the things I talk about.

                  “— and choose one of “Jeff” or “Jeff K” — both aren’t needed, i-d-i-o-t.”

                  Fuck you very much for the suggestion, Nancy. I know it makes your OCD flair up when you see things like that.

                  Sincerely, whatever the fuck I feel like.

                  Comment by Jeff K. — March 12, 2016 @ 6:39 am

            • “Who?

              Walter Lüftl

              Germar Rudolf, who has an advanced degree in Chemistry, is another.”

              You mean, the same Luftl who said the following:

              “In the “Lüftl Report,” supposed expert Walter Lüftl mentions a memo to the commandants of the concentration camps. According to Lüftl, it reads:

              The bordello and the crematories are not to be shown during camp visits. These installations are not to be mentioned to persons visiting the camp…

              Lüftl goes on to comment:

              Apparently, then, everything else could be shown and mentioned to visitors. Logically, then, a gas chamber, if one existed, could be shown and talked about; otherwise, it would have been included in the prohibition.

              Since we cannot assume that the SS ever showed a [homicidal] gas chamber to the inspectors of the International Red Cross, it is permissible to conclude that none existed.”

              Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!!!!

              😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸😸

              Sincerely,
              Jeff

              Comment by Jeff K. — March 11, 2016 @ 9:00 pm

            • Gemar Rudolf:

              “In 1996, the University of Stuttgart asked Rudolf to withdraw his application for a final PhD examination, or it would be denied, rendering his PhD thesis worthless. The legal basis for this is a German law which allows universities to deny or withdraw academic degrees where the candidate has used his academic credentials or knowledge to commit a crime. Rudolf subsequently withdrew his application.[3][non-primary source needed]”

              He has his masters, not his PhD. You did say advanced degree, you weren’t specific.

              Of course, that doesn’t stop Rudolf from CLAIMING a PhD under several pen names.

              https://web.archive.org/web/20150123073900/http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/not-the-science/

              Just for the hell of it, I’ll add some additional links.

              https://web.archive.org/web/20150118053324/http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/chemistry/blue/

              The essays are from actual PhD chemist.

              Peace,
              Jeff

              Comment by Jeff K. — March 11, 2016 @ 9:20 pm

              • Germar Rudolf wrote about his PhD on his own website at http://germarrudolf.com/germars-education/phd-thesis/ Germar is among the smartest people that have ever lived; he doesn’t need a title. But one does not have to be as smart as Germar Rudolf to reach the conclusion that there were no homicidal gas chambers at Auschwitz.

                Comment by furtherglory — March 12, 2016 @ 4:41 am

                • 70 years of research by actual historians not to mention real chemists like Richard Green have concluded otherwise.
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K. — March 12, 2016 @ 6:42 am

                • I had never heard of Richard Green before I read your comment. I did a search and found information about him at https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=7664

                  I don’t know anything about gassing. I base my opinion that the gas chamber in the main Auschwitz camp was not a gas chamber on the following facts:

                  The gas chamber building was across the street from the hospital for SS men.

                  The gas chamber building was not hidden from the other prisoners in the camp.

                  There was no crematorium to store the bodies until they could be burned in only a few ovens that were available.

                  The offices of the administrators of the camp were next door to the alleged gas chamber, where the gas fumes could have wafted over and killed them.

                  There was no undressing room for the victims. The victims, both men and women, allegedly undressed outside and then walked into the gas chamber, going through the autopsy room.

                  Comment by furtherglory — March 12, 2016 @ 7:02 am

              • not his PhD

                I said he had an “advanced degree”, not a PhD — so why mention this? — I think I know: a strong focus on credentials is a hallmark of a small-minded person — as stated, Rudolf withdrew his thesis not necessarily because it’s unworthy of a PhD — he was requested/advised to do so because he is a convicted ‘Holocaust denier’, and no university in Germany is going to award a doctorate to a convicted ‘Holocaust denier’, no matter how worthy the thesis.

                Rudolf from CLAIMING a PhD under several pen names

                If he does so then he’s wrong — I wouldn’t know if he does this or not as I don’t pay attention to bullshit like that — unlike small-minded people like you — I’m primarily interested in whether the extermination claims are true or not — here Rudolf’s writing is interesting, regardless of whether he has, or pretends to have, a PhD.

                Comment by eah — March 12, 2016 @ 8:48 am

                • not his PhD

                  “I said he had an “advanced degree”, not a PhD — so why mention this? — I think I know: a strong focus on credentials is a hallmark of a small-minded person — ”

                  You mean the same small-minded person who made such a big deal about Van Pelt’s qualifications?

                  “as stated, Rudolf withdrew his thesis not necessarily because it’s unworthy of a PhD — he was requested/advised to do so because he is a convicted ‘Holocaust denier’, and no university in Germany is going to award a doctorate to a convicted ‘Holocaust denier’, no matter how worthy the thesis.”

                  I don’t have a problem with Rudolf’s credentials.
                  My issue is with him claiming a PhD when doesn’t have one……by using fake names.
                  Undoubtedly he is smart enough to have the PhD.

                  Rudolf from CLAIMING a PhD under several pen names

                  “If he does so then he’s wrong — I wouldn’t know if he does this or not as I don’t pay attention to bullshit like that”

                  You mean like Van Pelt? A man deemed qualified enough to write a report for the court?

                  “— unlike small-minded people like you — ”

                  Oddly, this “small minded person”
                  does not make a habit of cursing people out on this blog.
                  Unlike some other pretentious douchebag I know…..

                  “I’m primarily interested in whether the extermination claims are true or not — here Rudolf’s writing is interesting, regardless of whether he has, or pretends to have, a PhD.”

                  And, naturally, his point of view matches your own.

                  Have a super happy great day,
                  Jeff

                  Comment by Jeff K — March 12, 2016 @ 10:03 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: