Scrapbookpages Blog

March 14, 2016

“Approximately 90 percent of the Jews deported to Birkenau were sent almost immediately to the gas chambers”

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust — furtherglory @ 12:52 pm

The title of my blog post today is a quote from a news article, which you can read in full here:  http://www.courant.com/community/woodstock/hc-pt-woodstock-speaker-discusses-female-face-of-genocide-0317-20160314-story.html

The news article begins by giving the credentials of the author:

Begin quote

Woodstock Academy welcomed Dr. Sarah Cushman as its third guest in a Genocide Speaker Series on March 7.

Cushman is the head of educational programming at the Strassler Center for Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Clark University in Worcester [England]. She has made it her mission to take a hard look at the Holocaust and examine how people came to be so brutal to others.

After receiving a B.A. in history and education from Bowdoin, she completed a PhD in holocaust history at Clark University. She was a Steven Spielberg Fellow in Holocaust History, a Holocaust Educational Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, a recipient of the Crown Family Doctoral Research Scholarship, and a recipient of the Lipper Doctoral Research Scholarship. For a Charles H. Revson Foundation Fellowship, Cushman researched the lives of women at the Birkenau concentration camp.

End quote from news article

With all these credentials, Dr. Sarah Cushman is obviously an expert on the Holocaust, so who am I to criticize or doubt her claims.

Here is the story of the Holocaust, as told by Dr. Cushman:

Begin quote from news article with my comments in brackets like this […]:

Approximately 90 percent of the Jews deported to Birkenau were sent almost immediately to the gas chambers. [Auschwitz Birkenau was 425 acres in size. Why were Jews sent to such a large place, only to be gassed upon arrival?]

They included pregnant women, women with young children, the elderly, and the disabled.

[It is well known that babies were born in the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp, and they survived.]

Ten percent were reserved for slave labor. Unsanitary conditions, starvation, disease, exposure to the elements, and forced hard labor killed most of them within three months of arrival, according to Cushman. [Why are so many Holocaust survivors alive today, and out on the lecture circuit telling lies?]

Some were guinea pigs in medical experiments. Some were forced to work as prostitutes for privileged male prisoners. The best jobs were in the factories, kitchens, and as couriers. Few women had access to these opportunities. Some served as prisoner functionaries. In return for supervising women prisoners, they received certain privileges, including more food and better clothing. The positions also came with a degree of power that required them to brutalize the women under their control.  [Their position of power also gave them the opportunity to save the women under their control. They were not REQUIRED to brutalize the women prisoners.]

I wrote about the Auschwitz brothel on this blog post:

https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2011/02/13/block-24-at-auschwitz-the-brothel/ ]

 

15 Comments »

  1. The ‘90% murdered & 10% martyred’ thing reminds me the thing of prominent exterminationists claiming that 90% of the Zyklon B delivered at Auschwitz was used for homicidal purposes and 10% for sanitary purposes (fumigation, delousing) and of other prominent exterminationists claiming that 10% of the Zyklon B delivered at Auschwitz was used for homicidal purposes and 90% for sanitary purposes.

    90% homicidal + 10% sanitary or 10% homicidal + 90% sanitary = 100% speculative

    Comment by hermie — March 14, 2016 @ 6:27 pm

    • Good point.

      Comment by Tim — March 14, 2016 @ 6:50 pm

    • FURTHERGLORYMM, HERMIE, TIM. The purpose of those Death Camps had been extermination of Jews arrived with the transports, mainly by gasing.or secundary by forced labor. which, due to time running out, offered a chance of surviving, deeply regreted in many comments here. Number of victims can only be estimated considering the number of persons who left with the trasports from various origins, Not even the SS comanders could tell the exact figures. The overhelming majority of survivors avoided to recall many painfull details of events they passed through. Those,,mostly aged,, employed by the Shoah Business Tear Pressing Division after having been well trained about what the market wants to hear are a minority. I, myself, have three relatives who survived Auschwitz but I nevear heard them recall details of the events. i, myself, survived only Theresienstadt, when interviewed by researchers, finnd ir painfull to recall things. Besides, my doctors advised me to avoid deliver seeches or take part in public debates in face of audiences. As any one can note on this site web side, in my essays I am wriing as amateur historian avoiding personal feeling or records.

      Comment by Wolf Murmelsteine — March 15, 2016 @ 4:02 am

      • wolf wrote: “The purpose of those Death Camps had been extermination of Jews arrived with the transports, mainly by gasing”

        Old worn out Allied atrocity propaganda. During WW1, some British propagandists had already turned epidemic areas with a high natural mortality rate into alleged murder areas where the evil Huns had supposedly slaughtered very numerous civilians in giant homicidal gas chambers. Nothing new. Quite easy to blame your enemies for deaths caused by lice, germs and other war-linked causes. Mere atrocity propaganda recycling during the following world war. No surprise. Nothing original. Only the usual Allied BS…

        Comment by hermie — March 15, 2016 @ 8:24 am

        • HERMIE. Events occured, not propaganda. Nazi defendants did not deny the fact only their personal responsability and claimed to have obeyed orders

          Comment by Wolf Murmelsteine — March 15, 2016 @ 10:19 am

          • Wolf wrote: “Nazi defendants did not deny the fact only their personal responsability and claimed to have obeyed orders”

            Unlike what is often alleged, some Nazi defendants denied the genocide* or any knowledge of it (when they should have been aware of it given their position during the war) [https://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8165&sid=3c036cb11da7262c839f9ff4c0debfb1]. And how could they have denied something they were not supposed to be aware of? One has to remember that during the years directly following WW2 the alleged mass slaughter of Europe’s Jewry was said to have been a Top Secret operation known to a few people – most of them dead after the war – only. That led to the surreal situation of a Goering – Hitler’s designated successor, the Third Reich’s political number two – trying to reconcile at Nuremberg what he had seen and heard during the war with what was claimed by the victors after the war by postulating that Himmler had probably ordered and implemented the mass slaughter of Europe’s Jewry behind his back and even behind Hitler’s back.

            By the way, false confessions occur much more often than most people believe.

            “It seems unfathomable that someone would admit to committing a crime that they had nothing to do with. But in more than 25 percent of the exonerations proven by DNA, that is exactly what happened.” (http://www.innocenceproject.org/causes-wrongful-conviction/false-confessions-or-admissions)

            Although impressive for most people, obtaining a few ‘confessions’ from some Nazis was nothing surprising or probative.

            * In fact, all the major Nazi defendants denied it prior to the Nuremberg mock trials.

            And Dr. Horst Pelckmann, defense counsel for the SS at Nuremberg, exposed the fact that over 1,500 SS men denied the alleged genocide of Europe’s Jewry.

            HERR PELCKMANN: On the question of whether the SS members recognized the destruction of Jewry as an aim of the leaders, 1,593 out of 1,637 affidavits which mention this problem state that the Jewish problem was not to be solved by killing or the so-called “final solution,” and that they had no knowledge of these intentions of the leaders. They point out that the SS members were forbidden to undertake individual acts against Jews. As evidence, numerous members refer to the fact that many death or other severe sentences were passed because of crimes against Jewish persons or Jewish property. (IMT Proceedings, vol. 21, p. 368)

            Comment by hermie — March 16, 2016 @ 2:09 am

            • The so-called rock-hard evidence for the ‘Holocaust’ pulverized once again!! Reduced to a fine powder as incoherent and fragile as coral sand…

              Comment by hermie — March 20, 2016 @ 9:02 am

  2. Looks like this show has ended abruptly . Will the audience demand their money back ?
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3491426/Former-Nazi-medic-95-duty-Anne-Frank-transported-Auschwitz-deemed-unfit-stand-trial-mass-murder.html

    Comment by peter — March 14, 2016 @ 4:17 pm

    • That’s a shocker. I’m surprised they didn’t tell him “tough shit”. Jews are gonna get great PR outta this one. I can hear them now. ” we’re not brutal like the nazis. Even though they were mean to us,we can still be kind”. Wonder what would happen if a nazi was just passing through and he stopped at the prison to take a dump. I can see the headlines now. “Nazi soldier who was passing through,stopped to take a dump at the Auschwitz prison. He has been arrested on accessory to murder charges”. My favorite one has always been the accountant at the prison who was charged with accessory to murder. How stupid is that shit? Hell if that’s the case,we should’ve put Al Capones book keeper on trial. Charge him with accessory to all the murders that Al Capone ordered. Guilt by association in a kangaroo court. That’s all this amounts to

      Comment by Tim — March 14, 2016 @ 5:26 pm

    • Please note the following, and add it the catalog (catalogue if you’re British) of known facts about the ‘Holocaust’:

      Although classed as a medic, such personnel at Auschwitz were not concerned with the health of inmates, but often poured in Zyklon-B pesticide crystals into the gas chamber to murder them.

      Given the nature of these proceedings, it’s not clear his inability to be present in court would bring them to a halt — they could rig up a video link and allow ‘survivors’ to berate him from afar — nothing he or his lawyer might say will make a difference anyway.

      Comment by eah — March 14, 2016 @ 6:15 pm

    • You really have to read the German language press to get the full picture of what is happening around this proceeding.

      Auschwitz-Komitee wirft dem Gericht vor, den Prozess gegen Hubert Zafke scheitern zu lassen

      This story makes it pretty clear the presiding judges sees this case as an embarrassment and would like to see it go away — but the Staatsanwaltschaft will continue to pursue it, at least in part due to heavy pressure from Jewish groups — the “Auschwitz-Komitee” is a Jewish group — in this story they are complaining about the behavior of the judge, who does not seem eager to get on with this case.

      “Erschreckender Rechtsruck” — Zentralratspräsident Josef Schuster zum Ausgang der Landtagswahlen

      Here the head of the top Jewish organization in Germany is complaining about the result of Sunday’s elections, where the AfD won a good share of the vote — I guess the Jews would prefer to see Germany overrun with Africans and muslims — demographically destroyed. But wait…

      ‘Taten statt Worte’ — Steinmeier verspricht konkrete Maßnahmen gegen Judenhass – Merkel verteidigt Josef Schuster

      Here Jews are complaining about growing Antisemitismus in Germany — but who are the anti-Semites? — well, mostly muslims — but in the previous article the Jews were complaining about the rise of the AfD, which wants to stop the inflow of muslims — it appears what the Jews want is for Germany to be demographically destroyed by immigration, but at the same time to construct a police state to control Antisemitismus. As usual the German establishment pays what I called before extreme obeisance to Jews by promising to do something about Antisemitismus.

      Comment by eah — March 15, 2016 @ 11:03 am

  3. My bad. I thought it was Clark University here in the USA. No wonder everyone loves her. She works at the Clark University in England . England loves to kiss the Jews ass. I don’t know. The queen probably doesn’t . Hey at least I didn’t get it confused with Clark Air Base in the Philippines. I had to get a flight out of there when I left ‘Nam. We no longer have it anymore. The Philippino government let it go to shit.

    Comment by Tim — March 14, 2016 @ 3:18 pm

    • Oh – absolutely Tim, we all drowning in holocaustianity here in England ! We can’t seem to get enough of it – as the schools organise trips to Auschwitz, and the once-respected BBC plus all the newspapers publish every old survivor’s account, regardless of whether its true or not.

      Apparently, the British government has given the go-ahead for an expensive “holocaust memorial-museum” to be built on the Banks of the River Thames in London – largely at tax-payers expense, of course. Won’t that be lovely? But I’ve never heard of the Clark University in Worcester before – but obviously genocide, holocausts, mass murders and massacres are lucrative subjects for turning into academic courses. You can’t go wrong with these subjects – except, of course, if you start diverging from the standard WW2 Holocaust narrative. And then you will quickly find that your university grant has dried up; your place in academia is over; and you’re out on the street.

      You mention the Queen “Kissing Jew Arse”. Well, she more-or-less has to – because her personal finances are largely controlled by the Rothschilds and other banking institutions in the City of London. But it interesting to note that back in March 1996, the Queen made an official Royal Tour to Poland. She went to Krakow, but it seemed mighty strange that she never visited Auschwitz to pay homage to the “holocaust” victims. But it’s clear now, that she was warned off by her advisors, who told her;- “Don’t go there Your Majesty, half that place is “Jake and Joannie” – fake and phony. This “holocaust” myth could collapse at any time, and it would bring the British Monarchy into disrepute if you were to be seen on world-wide TV bowing your head and laying wreaths at fake gas chamber sites.

      Comment by Talbot — March 14, 2016 @ 4:18 pm

      • I live here in Texas . I’m about 2 hours west of Houston . Go downtown Houston and the holocaust museum slap you right in the face. They pulled out all the stops on this one. I always thought people joked about the Jews being up to their eyeballs in the financial industry. Go downtown Houston . They’re every where. Go to downtown Houston where a lot of the energy and oil exploration companies are at. The Jews are up to their eyeballs In that too. Enron was a huge mega size energy company in Houston . They closed up in 2001. Justice Department showed up at their doorstep one day. They closed everything down. Lotta people been with that company 20 30 years,lost their jobs along with their retirement. Ken Lay was ceo of Enron. He had a Jew buddy there at the company who in just as deep. Andy Fastow. Judge let him off with a slap on the wrist. Andy boy got 6 years in the pen. Jeffery Skilling got 24 years. The judge went light on Andy because,he’d been subjected to “anti Semitic slurs”. That’s BS. Andy was in just as deep,but he got to skate on that one. I’m half convinced that the Jews have part control over the judicial system here in Texas . Any other time the judge would’ve told Andy Boy,”so what. You got your feelings hurt. Live with it”. So from what I see,the Jews control a ton of shit here in Texas too. I can understand the Queen having to go along with everything. She is who the country looks to. I still think it was funny when her grandson Harry was photographed at that party in Vegas ( I think it was Las Vegas) wearing that swastika arm band. I don’t know how much trouble he got in with his grandmother on that one. I remember when Princess Di was buried the Queens husband didn’t want to go to the funeral. He knew Elton John was gonna be there,so he figured the funeral would be packed with gays. So I figure he’s pretty much set in his ways,which means he ain’t gonna kiss a Jews ass either. I imagine he just does all that shit for the Jews rememberance because its political.

        Comment by Tim — March 14, 2016 @ 5:11 pm

  4. She probably don’t have anymore of the “right credentials “,than the next fool down the line. She just saying all the right things. That’s all. It reminds me of when our socialist president was elected. He’s black ( my bad. Half black),so everybody wanted to bring blacks that have “climbed the ladder”,into the spotlight. So they prop up Neil DeGrassee in the limelight. The man is in astrophysics and astro cosmology. He graduated University of Texas in ’83. Few years back he was labeled,”smartest man alive”. I take issue with that. Stephan Hawking. Theoretical physics and Quantum Gravity. Dr. Hawkings was being published long before Neil even thought of college. That’s the same shit with this lady. he’s putting her nose up the right asses. They’ve got her as the “holocaust poster child”. Like is the case with Neil DeGrasse. Nothing he says or cushman says,will ever be wrong. She’ll eventually wilt and die on the vine. Clark University? They ain’t even in the top 50. If shes so great,why did she settle on a second rate college?

    Comment by Tim — March 14, 2016 @ 2:02 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: