Scrapbookpages Blog

July 19, 2016

What is inside the Auschwitz building that has the windows blocked with black wooden covers?

Filed under: Germany, Health, Holocaust — furtherglory @ 11:32 am
Trudeau hugs Holocaust survivor Nate Leipciger during their visit to the site of former German Nazi concentration camp. (Photo: EPA/CP)

Justin Trudeau hugs Holocaust survivor Nate Leipciger during their visit to the site of former German Nazi concentration camp. (Photo: EPA/CP)

The photo above was taken recently in the Auschwitz main camp. It shows a building that has the windows blocked out.

I took a photo of this building on one of my trips to Auschwitz; my photo is shown below.

My photo of Auschwitz building with windows blocked out

My photo of Auschwitz building with the windows blocked out

Why is no one allowed to see what is inside this building? Why can’t we, at least, peek through the windows?

When Soviet troops arrived to liberate the prisoners at Auschwitz, they took a photo which showed that there was nothing covering the windows. The windows were blocked later by someone, who did not want us to know what really happened in this building.

My theory is that this is the building where Dr. Joseph Mengele did research on the diseases and medical conditions that were suffered by Jewish prisoners.

The Holocaust myth is that Dr. Mengele selected prisoners for the gas chambers. My theory is that Dr. Mengele did operations on the Jews who suffered from inherited conditions and diseases, as he tried to cure them.

My photo shows the blocked windows on the left

My photo shows the blocked windows on the left side of the courtyard

In the center of my photo above, you can see tourists standing in front of the famous black wall where prisoners were shot, after being convicted in a trial.

The black where prisoner were shot

The black wall where prisoner were shot

21 Comments »

  1. Eichmann in interview in Argentina in 1957 talks in detail about the mass murder of the Jews
    http://www.hannaharendtcenter.org/the-sassen-papers/

    Comment by DanKelso (@DanKelso1) — July 23, 2016 @ 3:45 pm

    • Yep….put some money in my hands and I’ll tell you anything you want to hear!” is the name of the lying game! BUT here is a TRUE HONEST JEWISH MAN Who I pray for setting the record straight! David Cole in Auschwitz full documentary 1992 – YouTube

      ▶ 59:46


      2015/01/26 – アップロード元: odvn
      David Cole in Auschwitz full documentary 1992 … any real power (and being an atheist and a Jew, something …

      Comment by Jim — July 25, 2016 @ 5:33 am

    • Why does the ‘evidence’ of Holohoaxsters always look like Ufology and Bigfoot hunting? Ô yes, I was forgetting… That’s because there are both identical in nature. After all, perhaps no surprise the laughable Sassen papers turned out to be just food for Life Magazine…

      Comment by hermie — July 26, 2016 @ 8:08 am

  2. To stupid Holocaust deniers, former Nazi Willem Sassen secretly recorded Eichmann in an interview in the mid 50s in Argentina. Life magazine got a copy of it and published it in 1960.
    In the interview, Eichmann admits to the Final Solution ordered by Hitler, the gas chambers, the mass deportations, and the mass murders.
    You cant use the British forced Eichmann to say this like the Holocaust deniers try to do with Hoess
    Google, Willem Sassen Eichmann interview.

    Do you know who Franz Suchomel is?
    Franz Suchomel was secretly recorded for the movie Shoah. Suchomel was one of the top SS guards at Treblinka.
    Listen to his interview that was shown in the movie Shoah in 1985.
    Franz Suchomel who talks very detailed about the gas chambers at Treblinka and the mass murder of the Jews there.
    His interviews are on Youtube

    Franz Stangl the top Nazi commandant at Treblinka did 70 hours of interviews with Gitta Sereny in 1971 about this role in the mass murder of the Jews at Treblinka.
    Gitta wrote a book about the interview called
    Into That Darkness: An Examination of Conscience.
    http://www.amazon.com/Into-That-Darkness-Examination-Conscience/dp/0394710355

    Comment by DanKelso (@DanKelso1) — July 23, 2016 @ 3:44 pm

    • Watch your mouth little lady. You left out one important fact. He sold the shit to life. Now that alone makes me think,he did that shit for his own benefit. Here’s the part you left out Nancy. Lifr got called down on their,”source”Life ( being the responsible liberal rag they claim to be),they said ,”we didn’t know he was a collaborator “. One of two things happened here. Number one. Life magazine was run by a wreckless editor,who clearly didn’t realize,”check your source”. Duh. Life didn’t know this idiot from the man in the moon. Don’t ya think they would’ve lookedinto his background,so they could see if this clown was who he said he was? There’s first clue Sherlock . The second scenario,is just as f–ked up. Once again showing how wreckless life magazine could be. They bought the BS story hook,line and sinker. They ran it just so they can make “money”. F–k wether it’s true or not. To borrow a line from Hendix,”in your measley little world”, you probably haven’t figured out that,wether it be a broadcast news outlet or a printed news outlet,they rarely tell the truth. They monkey around with the shit,until they think they got something the sheep want to hear. This shit took place in the mid 50’s. Eichmann went on trial in ’61. That’s a helluva lot of time to for the evidence to become corrupted. Why did this hammerhead wait so damn long in brining this shit to light? You gonna tell me willie didn’t know they had a warrant out for Eichmanns arrest. Willie Boy could’ve been a hero. Clearly he knew where Eichmann was at. He clearly had a so called,”taped” confession. Holy Shit ! He could’ve been superman . Why did he wait so long to make this tape known? Made in the mid 50′,yet Eichmann went on trial in ’61. Hell the chickenshit rat bastard,could’ve snitched out Eichmann way before ’61. He could’ve been the darling of the prosecution. He’d would’ve been made their main bitch. Here’s one you’ve clearly not asked yourself. Why wasn’t this piece of shit snitch,ever put on trial? He died 2002. Clearly he lived a long life. He sided with the nazis. He was tight with Eichmann. Barroom buddies according to Ol Willie Boy. Hell they could’ve put a case on his ass and toss a rope around his neck. Like I said,”he was probably the bitch of the prosecution”. Oh yeah. Willies daughter. I wouldn’t trust her no further than I could throw a bull by the tail. She claimed herself to be a communist at the age of 12. Communist can’t be trusted either. String that bitch up.

      Comment by Tim — July 23, 2016 @ 4:54 pm

    • The thing quite funny with the Suchomel acting performance is the sentence Suchomel didn’t say, i.e. ‘You don’t take notes, Mr. Lanzman?’ A foreign journalist had given him some money for an alleged anonymous interview, and Herr Suchomel was visibly not surprised at all to see Lanzman write nothing when he was providing various details, names, numbers, dates, etc. A very odd behavior on the part of a journalist who was supposedly neither taping nor recording the interview with a microphone. But perhaps Suchomel was just too busy looking at the camera like an aspiring actor…😉

      Comment by hermie — July 24, 2016 @ 4:42 pm

  3. FG. This has nothing to do with your post here. I’m asking,because I’ve seen you and some of your readers are well schooled in the art of motion pictures,of the 20’s and 30’s. I’ve tried to watch silent pictures before,but the shit just didn’t fly with me. I watched Metropolis and Faust the other night. They were movies directed by F W Murnau and Fritz Lang. Both German directors . Like I said I never liked silent films,because they’re that damned boring. The only silent films I could ever watch,were the Keystone Cops. Humor is the only thing that saved their ass. These 2 German fellas that made the silent movies I saw,went all out. Metropolis may have very well been silent,but set design,the characters and overall structure of the movie made it enjoyable to watch in lack of sound. Are there any other German film makers out there like these 2 fellas from the silent era? I know there’s a black guy who remade “birth of a nation”. I don’t think I’ll be seeing it. The sound in the movie is gonna ruin it. Its kinda like when they take old B&W movies and try to color them. That shit don’t even fly. It would be like taking a ’47 Mercury and adding power windows,locks and built in GPS. It don’t fly. That’s not what the car was about.

    Comment by Tim — July 20, 2016 @ 9:20 am

    • You wrote: “It would be like taking a ’47 Mercury and adding power windows,locks and built in GPS. It don’t fly. That’s not what the car was about.”

      I used to have a Mercury. There was a popular song that had the words “me and that Mercury stayed side by side4” in a drag race. I used to drag race in my Mercury. I would drive up next to another car at a stop light and gun the engine, indicating that I wanted to drag race. I was quite good at drag racing.

      Comment by furtherglory — July 20, 2016 @ 10:07 am

    • Some time ago, I watched Georges Méliès’ Le Voyage dans la Lune (A trip to the Moon, 1902) and I enjoyed it.

      Comment by hermie — July 20, 2016 @ 6:50 pm

      • That was a good one. I usually don’t short movies,but that one was good. They must’ve had some sort of technical advisor for the movie. They had their return to earth. They landed in the ocean. Once in the ocean a ship was sent to recover the vehicle. The one I enjoyed the most,was “Metropolis”. I think the special effects for that movie,were way ahead of their time. I found one thing interesting about Fritz. They said his moma was a Jew,but she converted to the catholic way of thinking pretty quick. Fritz was raised a strict Catholic. He made one movie. He got called to a meeting with Gobbels after the movie was finished . Gobbels apologized for having to ban the movie. He felt it would have a negative effect on everyone. He did however recognize the genius of Fritz. Even though Goebbels banned the movie that Fritz made,he offered Fritz the position of the head of the German film studio,UFA. Here’s my question. Goebbels was one of the top dog nazis. If he hated Jews so bad,why would he offer that position to Fritz? Yeah,Fritz was a full blown catholic. Everyone and their dog,knew his mother was born a Jew,but converted to being a catholic ASAP. She raised him as a strict catholic. The nazis knew his mother was born a Jew,she just converted to a catholic. So if they hate Jews so bad,why would Goebbels offer him such a powerful position in an industry,where he will be dealing with the public. I mean with a position with that much power,he could put shit out there to sway the public big time

        Comment by Tim — July 21, 2016 @ 9:14 am

  4. Does anybody know who made the drawing at the bottom of FG’s article and when it was made?

    Comment by hermie — July 20, 2016 @ 3:55 am

  5. Consulting the photo I took of the ‘map’ of Auschwitz I when I toured it in 2015, it says of Block 10:
    “Block where women prisoners, mainly Jewish were subjected to sterilization experiments by SS doctors”.

    (Gotta slip in yet another dig at the evil Nazis and how they mistreated poor Jewish women, right?)

    I suspect that, since the windows on the other side (Block 11) are either barred or bricked-up, the Jews added the black window covers in order to make it seem more ominous and deathly in that closed-off area. The window covers are most definitely a post-war addition, the woodwork and paint are too fresh to be otherwise.

    Hmmm, I wonder if those evil, evil Nazis let the condemned prisoners have a refreshing dip in that ‘fire brigade reservoir’ that is only a few metres away, behind Block 6, before they shot them in front of the ‘Wall of Execution’ with magic bullets that somehow don’t leave a mark in the bricks?

    Or maybe it’s all just bullshit, and we’ve been lied to for seventy years…?

    Comment by John Smith — July 19, 2016 @ 1:59 pm

    • You wrote: “Consulting the photo I took of the ‘map’ of Auschwitz I when I toured it in 2015, it says of Block 10:
      “Block where women prisoners, mainly Jewish were subjected to sterilization experiments by SS doctors”.”

      Dr. Mengele was doing something in Block 10, but it was probably not something evil. He might have been doing some experiments to discover methods that would be helpful to pregnant women in the future.

      Comment by furtherglory — July 19, 2016 @ 4:03 pm

    • There’s a lot of evidence to support the claim that the Nazis conducted sterilisation experiments at Auschwitz, including a message that was intercept by the British, decoded at Bletchley Park, and discovered by David Irving:

      On October 26, 1942 the codebreakers found Berlin warning Auschwitz to stand by to receive two visitors from the Führer’s Chancellery in Berlin – the agency supervising euthanasia and various other killing schemes – for a lengthy stay at the camp: they would be setting up an X-ray sterilisation operation, the radio signal said (this being the method chosen by the S.S. to keep the Jews from breeding). (GC&CS German Police Section intercept: Lolling, Amt D III, to Auschwitz, Oct 26, 1942 (PRO file HW.16/11).]
      http://www.fpp.co.uk/Auschwitz/docs/PoliceDecodes.html

      Then there’s the Doctors’ Books that were submitted as evidence in the 1964 Dering v Uris libel trial in London. In them are recorded many operations performed by prisoner-doctor Dering and his colleagues when they removed the testicles or ovaries of prisoners after they’d been subjected to X-ray treatment. See the book Auschwitz in England which reproduces larges part of the trial’s transcript.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dering_v_Uris
      https://www.amazon.com/Auschwitz-England-Record-Libel-Action/dp/B000AYCEFA

      Here’s an affidavit (with photos of him naked) by Polish Jew Chaim Balitzki who lost his testicles at aged 23 because of X-ray experiments in Auschwitz. He claims he was among a group of 20 Jewish men aged 20—24 who were subjected to x-rays on their scrotums in the autumn of 1943. What Balitzki claims about the procedure of the x-rays and the subsequent surgery to remove the testicles was all pretty-much corroborated by Wladislaw Dering during his libel action against Uris:
      http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/php/pflip.php?caseid=HLSL_NMT01&docnum=120&numpages=12&startpage=1&title=Affidavit.&color_setting=C
      http://nuremberg.law.harvard.edu/php/pflip.php?caseid=HLSL_NMT01&docnum=1970&numpages=11&startpage=1&title=Eidesstattliche+Erklaerung..&color_setting=C

      Comment by The Black Rabbit of Inlé — July 19, 2016 @ 4:11 pm

      • Photograph copies of pages of the register and the list of 130 operations in the particulars were handed to Dr Dering, and copies were also supplied to the jury. He said that he had checked that each case in the list was in the register produced in court. Though he did not in 1964 remember much about the actual operation, he could, by looking at the last column, tell its nature, and also which of the patients had had irradiation before coming to him. There were two in the first forty-six which had not been previously X-rayed. Two or three cases in the list had been sentenced by a German court to have testicles removed. An entry of amputatio testis sin. in the register indicated to him a patient sent to him by Schumann after X-ray for the removal of the left testicle. Schumann also sent a list showing which testicle, left or right, was to be removed.

        Mr Duncan: Do you remember, of your own recollection because this is very important—whether, with the exception of two or three cases we are going to discuss, they were all patients who had had radiation?

        Dr Dering: Yes, all.
        Of the two ‘exceptions’, one was a simple hernia and the testicle was not removed; the other was a hernia and tumor where it was surgically necessary to remove the testicle.

        He remembered one case as that of a person sentenced by a German court to have his testicles removed. That operation, being a sentence, was reserved for S.S. doctors; but on a number of occasions the S.S. doctor began the operation and left Dr Dering to finish it.

        He was referred to the original register and ‘No. 10′ in the list—an operation on 20 May 1943, described as caus explorativus, castratio. That, he said, was a castration after X-ray. Another—’No. 40’, sterilisatio—had been a German woman sentenced by a German court for some crime against morality. Case ‘No. 2’ on 12 April 1943, was a German gypsy sentenced to be sterilized because of some hereditary disease. The German court usually ordered ‘exactly what was to be done’. He did not remember why he, rather than the German doctors, had done it. He had assisted at another operation following a court sentence—vita sexualis anormalis. ‘Assisting’ meant preparing the patient and helping during the procedure. Some of the Germans were ‘not very advanced surgeons’, and he had had to watch in order to prevent their making mistakes—’as in a teaching hospital’. Three entries, Nos. 47, 48 and 49, on 16 September—not in his handwriting indicated Germans who had not been X-rayed. Though he was recorded as the surgeon, he thought it unlikely that he had been, and did not remember them; and there were two on 30 September. He did not accept them as accurate.

        – Auschwitz in England, pp.71-72.

        Comment by The Black Rabbit of Inlé — July 19, 2016 @ 4:17 pm

  6. “What is inside the Auschwitz building that has the windows blocked with black wooden covers? ”

    This is the building where Holohoaxsters hide “the mountains of evidence” they claim they have. (Some people even claim that there’s a tanned artifact of Elie’s tattoo in there.) That, or it’s a storage warehouse for extra mirrors and smoke generators. What else?😉

    Comment by hermie — July 19, 2016 @ 1:18 pm

  7. I did a quick video about it…

    Comment by jrizoli — July 19, 2016 @ 11:44 am

    • It’s not a “granite wall”, Jim Rizoli, that thing is made of cork [or something similar], and wood.


      Here’s another Soviet photo which shows that it wasn’t present at liberation:

      The fake “wall protector” does appear in footage shot in 1951; it also shows the windows of Block 10 had been boarded-up by the Soviet-Poles by then:


      http://www.britishpathe.com/video/aftermath-of-atrocity/query/auschwitz

      Comment by The Black Rabbit of Inlé — July 19, 2016 @ 3:27 pm

    • I think if that was the “wall of death” you would see so many holes (and even bullets in the wall) it would obvious. Also that wall is so close to living quarters, places where people sit, etc. that you would have heard of quite a few innocent bystanders hit by “ricochet”bullets

      Comment by Jim — July 25, 2016 @ 5:23 am

      • What’s the “wall of death”? I think I got a pretty good idea. It sounds like something Pablo Escobar would’ve put into use,for all the people that f–ked him over.

        Comment by Tim — July 26, 2016 @ 8:57 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: