Scrapbookpages Blog

August 27, 2016

The cremation ovens at the Majdanek camp

Filed under: Holocaust — furtherglory @ 9:05 am
The front side of the ovens at Majdanek

The front side of the cremation ovens at  the Majdanek camp

The back side of the Majdanek ovens Photo Credit: Simon Robertson

The back side of the Majdanek ovens Photo Credit:  Simon Robert

The original wooden crematorium building at Majdanek was allegedly burned to the ground by the Nazis on July 22, 1944, just before they abandoned the camp; the cremation ovens remained intact and tourists can still see these ovens today.

The reconstructed crematorium at Majdanek, which is open to tourists, is located at the top of a long slope, behind the spot where the barracks in Field V once stood. The reconstructed crematorium is a copy of the second crematorium that was built in the camp; it was not put into operation until the autumn of 1943, according to the Museum guidebook.

When the Majdanek camp first opened, the bodies were buried in mass graves, but from June 1942 on, the bodies were burned in the first crematorium, or on pyres made from the chassis of old lorries (trucks), according to information in the camp guidebook.

The first crematorium is no longer in existence, and I never learned the exact location of it when I visited the camp in 1998.  The original crematorium had two ovens which had been brought to Majdanek from the Sachsenhausen camp in Germany. The new crematorium was outfitted with five Kori ovens which were fueled with coke.

As you first walk into the crematorium at Majdanek, you see a row of five ovens. The ovens are placed so close to the entrance door that you realize that there would not have been enough room for workers to slide the bodies inside. Then you walk around to the other side and see that the bodies were allegedly put into the ovens from the back side and the ashes taken out on the front side, only a few feet from the entrance door.

According to Martin Gilbert in his book entitled “Holocaust Journey,” there is a gas chamber in the crematorium building. This gas chamber, like the building, is a reconstruction. Since this gas chamber is a reconstruction, it does not show the blue staining that is present in the other alleged gas chambers at Majdanek, which were used for the disinfection of the clothing of the prisoners.

The reconstructed gas chamber room in the crematorium is very small; it has a hole in the ceiling for pouring in the poison gas crystals, and there is a floor drain directly below the hole. The door to this gas chamber is missing, and may have been taken to another museum to be displayed.

A casting of an alleged Majdanek gas chamber door was on display at the United States Holocaust Museum in Washington, D.C. when I visited the museum several years ago.

Right next to the room, at Majdanek, which has the 5 ovens, there is an alcove, or room open on one side, which has a large concrete bathtub. According to my tour guide, this tub was used by the SS man in charge of the ovens, when he took a bath. In the shower room adjacent to the other gas chambers at Majdanek, there are two similar concrete bathtubs where the prisoners were dipped into disinfectant before taking a shower. The reconstructed gas chamber in the crematorium resembles a shower room.

Crematorium building

Old photo of the Crematorium building at Majdanek before it was burned

The black and white photo below shows the ruined crematorium as it allegedly looked when Russian soldiers arrived at the camp on July 23, 1944. The wooden crematorium building had allegedly been set on fire by the Nazis in order to burn the bodies of Polish political prisoners who had been brought from the Gestapo prison at the Castle in Lublin and executed the day before liberation of the camp. [Actually, these prisoners had been killed by the Russians when they first arrived in Lublin.]

MajdanekKrema.jpg

The photo above shows the bodies of the men who were brought to the camp, from a nearby prison, and burned by the Russian liberators of the camp, who then blamed the Germans for this deed.

In another room of the crematorium building is the concrete dissection table, on which the bodies were examined for valuables hidden in body cavities, according to the tour guide. It was here also that the gold teeth were removed from the victims after they had allegedly been gassed.

 

21 Comments »

    • You wrote: “Is this a bakery in Minnesota?”

      Actually, the oven in the photo DOES look like the ovens, used at Dachau, to burn the bodies of the prisoners who died in the camp.
      I show photos of the ovens on this page of my website: http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/KZDachau/CrematoriaArea/NewCrematorium04.html

      Comment by furtherglory — August 30, 2016 @ 9:43 am

      • Holocaust or Hoax Jurgen Graf p.138

        The evolution of the Holocaust lie: A Summary

        We may now distinguish five stages in the evolution of the Holocaust Lie, which are, of course, not strictly segregated, but which merge gradually into each other in turn:

        1) from 1942 to around the beginning of 1946, the story was that the Nazis were killing the Jews — mostly in extermination and concentration camps — with steam, electricity, fire, acids, pneumatic hammers, quicklime, combat gasses, Diesel exhaust gases, Zyklon B, boiling water, blood poisoning, suffocation, conveyor belt shootings, etc. etc. Even as late as 14 December 1945, at the Nuremberg Trial, it was claimed that Jews at Treblinka were killed with hot steam.

        2) Between 1946 and 1960, the story changed somewhat; during the Nuremberg Trial, a decision was made to claim that poison gas was the murder weapon: all the other killing methods in the extermination and concentration camps were relegated to the Memory Hole.

        The claim was now made that almost every camp had one or more gas chambers.

        3) From 1960 to 1983, the story was that the Nazis killed the Jews with gas, mostly in five or six extermination camps located on polish soil. The gas chambers in the Western camps were jettisoned.

        4) In the period between 1983 and 1996, the gas chambers in the Western camps (except for Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen and Dachau) made a miraculous come-back in Kogon/Langbein/Rückerl masterpiece Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas.

        In the West, or so the story goes, there were relatively few gassings; the Jews were gassed by the millions in five or six extermination camps in Poland.

        5) In 1996, a radical new version of the Holocaust appeared in the form of the Goldhagen book (Hitler’s Willing Executioners), preceded by the Korzec trial balloon in Holland. The gassings are now to be explained away as an insignificant “epiphenomenon”. Everywhere the Germans went, they murdered Jews with primitive cruelty, out of a hatred for Jews rooted in German history and tradition.

        But how will the ruling cliques explain how we got the story wrong for half a century?

        Comment by Jim Rizoli — August 30, 2016 @ 10:51 am

        • Since the HoloHoax is on par with CULT worship here is a way to break free of it….
          holocaustdeprogrammingcourse.com

          Comment by Jim Rizoli — August 30, 2016 @ 10:56 am

  1. Finishing up my latest book
    Holohoax Summary

    Holocaust or Hoax Jurgen Graf p.138
    Short and sweet….

    We may now distinguish five stages in the evolution of the Holocaust Lie, which are, of course, not strictly segregated, but which merge gradually into each other in turn: 1) from 1942 to around the beginning of 1946, the story was that the Nazis were killing the Jews — mostly in extermination and concentration camps — with steam, electricity, fire, acids, pneumatic hammers, quicklime, combat gasses, Diesel exhaust gases, Zyklon B, boiling water, blood poisoning, suffocation, conveyor belt shootings, etc. etc.

    Even as late as 14 December 1945, at the Nuremberg Trial, it was claimed that Jews at Treblinka were killed with hot steam. 2) between 1946 and 1960, the story changed somewhat; during the Nuremberg Trial, a decision was made to claim that poison gas was the murder weapon: all the other killing methods in the extermination and concentration camps were relegated to the Memory Hole.

    The claim was now made that almost every camp had one or more gas chambers. 3) from 1960 to 1983, the story was that the Nazis killed the Jews with gas, mostly in five or six extermination camps located on polish soil. The gas chambers in the Western camps were jettisoned. 4) in the period between 1983 and 1996, the gas chambers in the Western camps (except for Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen and Dachau) made a miraculous come-back in Kogon/Langbein/Rückerl masterpiece Nationalsozialistische Massentötungen durch Giftgas.

    In the West, or so the story goes, there were relatively few gassings; the Jews were gassed by the millions in five or six extermination camps in Poland. 5) in 1996, a radical new version of the Holocaust appeared in the form of the Goldhagen book, preceded by the Korzec trial balloon in Holland. The gassings are now to be explained away as an insignificant “epiphenomenon”. Everywhere the Germans went, they murdered Jews with primitive cruelty, out of a hatred for Jews rooted in German history and tradition. But how will the ruling cliques explain how we got the story wrong for half a century?

    Comment by jrizoli — August 27, 2016 @ 7:00 pm

  2. I’m reading this book now….
    Holocaust or Hoax Jurgen Graf p.120

    Pretty funny! Yet sadly many Germans went to their deaths for this misinformation.

    Sobibor is mentioned in a short exchange of correspondence between Heinrich Himmler and the Inspector of Concentration Camps, Richard Glücks from 1943. Glücks suggested converting Sobibor into a “concentration camp”. Himmler rejected this suggestion on 5 July 1943 (8). So what kind of camp was it? The exterminationists say it was an extermination camp. The number of victims is generally estimated at 200,000 to 250,000 victims. With regards to the murder weapon, it took decades for the ruling cliques in the world to decide which one it was. One of the eyewitnesses, a Soviet Jew named Alexander Pechersky, described the mass murders as follows (9):
    “At first glance, as one entered, it like a normal shower: hot and cold taps for running water, wash basins… as soon as everyone was inside, the doors slammed shut with a loud noise. Out of holes in the ceiling, a heavy, blackish substance poured down in spiral shapes…”
    To drown out the pitiful cries of the victims, the Germans at Sobibor kept a flock of geese [!] which were made to quack (or whatever noise it is that is made by geese), very loudly, whenever the blackish substance was introduced (10). Historians were not too hot on this version, so they soon changed it into a gas chamber yarn. According to Poliakov, the murder weapon was a Diesel motor (11); Hilberg replaced the Diesel motor with a gasoline motor (12); the Enzyklopaedie des Holocaust finally put an end to the debate by declaring that the murder weapon was a Diesel motor, and that settles it (13).
    Sobibor and Chelmno play quite a subordinate role in Holocaust propaganda. The names are often unknown, even to people familiar with contemporary history.
    Belzec

    Comment by Jim Rizoli — August 27, 2016 @ 1:45 pm

    • You wrote: “Glücks suggested converting Sobibor into a “concentration camp”. Himmler rejected this suggestion on 5 July 1943 (8). So what kind of camp was it? The exterminationists say it was an extermination camp.”

      Sobibor is one of the few camps that I did not visit. I could not find a tour guide who was willing to take me there and I did not want to go alone. I was warned by the tour guides that I was likely to be robbed there.
      However, I did do a web page on Sobibor, written from the point of view of a Holocaust believer. I believe that Sobibor was a transit camp.
      http://www.scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Sobibor/Tour01.html

      Comment by furtherglory — August 27, 2016 @ 1:56 pm

      • For the record….I’m in a reading mood today…LOL
        Might as well share what I’ve been reading with ya…

        Treblinka

        Holocaust or Hoax Jurgen Graf p.122

        For the largest of the “pure extermination camps”, the exterminationists throw numbers around ranging from 750,000 to 3,000,000. At the Jerusalem trial of John Demjanjuk (17), there was talk of 875,000.
        According to the classic book Die Hölle von Treblinka by the Soviet Jew Vassily Grossman (18), the following methods of murder were used:
        – suffocation of the victims by pumping air out of the death chambers. This technically quite impossible horror story — the chambers would have collapsed due to the underpressure — immediately disappeared from the arsenal of the Holocaust propagandists;
        – baking the victims with hot steam. This variant was decided upon by the Nuremberg tribunal on 14 December 1945 (Nuremberg Document PS-3311);
        – killing them with Diesel exhaust gas. This variant pushed the others off the stage of history. In February 1946, a Jew named Samuel Rajzman testified at Nuremberg that, in Treblinka, there were three, later, however, another ten additional gas chambers (Nuremberg trial transcript IMT VIII p. 361, German text). Since then, the exterminationists no longer wish to hear anything about the “steam chambers” (also described at Nuremberg three months earlier), or the air-pumping vacuum chambers, or the chlorine executions and assembly line shootings at Treblinka, of which there was some talk for a while
        As at Chelmno, Sobibor and Belzec, the bodies at Treblinka are supposed to have been buried in mass graves, but dug up in 1943 and cremated without a trace under the open sky. The Israeli “specialist” Y. Arad reported
        “The men responsible for the cremations noted immediately that the bodies burnt well, even without additional fuel.”
        This method is supposed to have been developed by a technically ingenious SS man by the name of Herbert Floss, who is said to have discovered that old bodies of fat women burnt best. He then used these ideally combustible cadavers as fuel for the others (21). It is unfortunate that this efficient method of corpse destruction has not yet been discovered by the inhabitants of the Indian sub-continent, who have chopped down a large part of their forests just to burn corpses. Perhaps the reason for it is that bodies only burn by themselves under the SS system of hatred and violence; under “free-democratic” conditions, they just won’t burn by themselves, due to their high water content (over 60%).

        According to documentation drawn up during the war by Jewish groups, there were 10 gas chambers in Treblinka, which could hold a total of 6,000 men at a time. The path to these death chambers was surrounded by hedges and only 1.5 m wide (22), which means, that only two men could march side by side. Assuming an interval of half a metre between every person marching and the person in front, this would mean a line of people waiting 2 kilometres long! According to Adalbert Rückerl, the former director of the Ludwigsburg Central Office for the Prosecution of NS Crimes, there were only 35 to 40 SS men employed at Treblinka, which means that each SS man was responsible for at least 150 Jews! Fortunately, the Jews proved unusually cooperative; instead of running away or overpowering the pair of SS men, they marched, according to a witness at the Düsseldorf Treblinka Trial, “naked and meekly into the gas chamber”.

        During the Jerusalem trial against John Demjanjuk, Treblinka returned to the spotlight of the world’s attention. Demjanjuk, a US citizen of Ukranian-origin and automobile worker, was extradited from the United States in violation of all democratic procedures to Israel, where he was hauled before the court as “Ivan the Terrible”, murderer of hundreds of thousands at Treblinka. Five Jewish “eyewitnesses” swore they had seen him pushing Jews into the gas chambers after cutting off their ears, cutting women’s breasts off with a sword, and cutting open the stomachs of pregnant women with a sword. Demjanjuk was first sentenced to death, but was acquitted on appeal for lack of proof, and released in September 1993; once again proving the “credibility” of such eyewitnesses.

        Update…
        Demjanjuk…Tried again but since has died a broken man I’m sure, because the Jews just don’t want to let go of their hoax…

        Comment by Jim Rizoli — August 27, 2016 @ 2:09 pm

        • John Demjanjuk was alleged to have been a Ukrainian national who was recruited by the Germans into a militia nicknamed the “Hiwis”.

          From what I gather, these men consisted of anti-Soviet personnel and pro-Ukraine nationalists, with various renegade elements such as former Soviet POW’s who were recruited by the Germans inside the prison camps.

          Apparently, these Hiwis formed the bulk of the security force at each of the three Rheinhardt camps – Treblinka, Sobibor and Belzec.
          The SS contingent in each of these camps amounted to no more than 30 officers and guards in each.

          Thus, the holocaust proponents are seriously trying to tell us that the security for these top secret “extermination camps” was more-or-less in the hands of these Ukrainian militia guards – whose loyalty to the German cause was questionable in the first place, and whose dedication and commitment to a policy of mass killing would be extremely doubtful. In actual fact, it would be most unlikely that these men would even agree to take part in such a murderous enterprise in the first place

          Would the SS have really placed the security of these camps in the hands of such a potentially unreliable militia? How could they rely on them if a crisis or revolt broke out. Could the SS be 100% certain that they would quell the insurrection, or would these men join the revolt – or more likely, just flee the scene!

          And would not these Hiwis be fearful of what might happen to them once “the exterminations” were over, and the camps dismantled. The holocaust proponents always tell us that Operation Rheinhardt was so secret that all evidence of what happened had be destroyed; all witnesses silenced; and the camps, not just razed to the ground, but completely obliterated.

          In addition, the personnel ratios inside these three camps is all wrong for security at alleged “death camps”. At each location, we have 30 SS officers ( of which no more than 20-or-so were ever on duty at the same time); 120 Hiwis ( of which about 80 were ever on duty at the same time ); plus between 600 and 1,000 Jewish forced workers inside the camp. With trains arriving, and depositing hundreds of Jewish victims at the ramp, would it not have been possible ( even likely – considering that they were all destined for death anyway ) for this vast number of Jews to completely overwhelm the SS men, leaving the Hiwis leaderless, and thus prone to joining the revolt or fleeing for their lives.

          No – if these were “death camps”, then security would be completely in the hands of a sizeable force of reliable SS men ( several hundred in fact – if you’ve got 1000 hostile Jews to control, plus many others arriving day-by-day ). If you did deploy Hiwis, then these men would be only be given guard duties at the outer perimeter of these facilities – where they cannot see, hear, or interfere with what is going on inside the camp.

          The personnel ratios are completely nuts for an alleged “death camp”, but are quite sensible for a harmless transit camp, where only low-level security is required.

          Comment by Talbot — August 28, 2016 @ 7:15 am

          • Something I’ve thought and noticed too, Talbot. Especially because of the alleged secrecy thing. Why would the Nazis have put their alleged Top Secret Judeocide in the hands of guys who were not even Germans? IMO, this sole fact debunks 2 WW2 hoaxes together: the AR Holohoax of millions of Jews and the alleged German mass murder of 3 million non-Jewish Ukrainians during WW2. I doubt some Ukrainian nationalists would have kept working for the Germans in the AR camps when the latter were supposedly butchering 3 million of their brothers and sisters in Ukraine itself. 100% nonsensical…

            Comment by hermie — August 29, 2016 @ 6:39 am

          • “From what I gather, these men consisted of anti-Soviet personnel and pro-Ukraine nationalists, with various renegade elements such as former Soviet POW’s who were recruited by the Germans inside the prison camps.”

            You are correct.

            “Apparently, these Hiwis formed the bulk of the security force at each of the three Rheinhardt camps – Treblinka, Sobibor and Belzec.
            The SS contingent in each of these camps amounted to no more than 30 officers and guards in each.”

            Again, you are correct, more or less.

            “Thus, the holocaust proponents are seriously trying to tell us that the security for these top secret “extermination camps” was more-or-less in the hands of these Ukrainian militia guards – whose loyalty to the German cause was questionable in the first place, and whose dedication and commitment to a policy of mass killing would be extremely doubtful.”

            Except that many of them were anti-Semitic themselves. The Hiwis went to a training camp, undoubtedly they were picked to match their duty assignment. Also, they benefited monetarily, they had their pick of Jewish loot so they were well compensated.
            The Germans benefitted from native anti-Semetism on other occasions, they did in this one as well. They also benefited by implicating these men in crimes so that it was in their best interest to keep quiet.

            “In actual fact, it would be most unlikely that these men would even agree to take part in such a murderous enterprise in the first place”

            They would if it meant getting out of the death traps otherwise known as Soviet POW camps. In that circumstance self-preservation trumps everything. Also, see above.

            “Would the SS have really placed the security of these camps in the hands of such a potentially unreliable militia? How could they rely on them if a crisis or revolt broke out. Could the SS be 100% certain that they would quell the insurrection, or would these men join the revolt – or more likely, just flee the scene!”

            We actually have two instances where revolts happened….Sobibor and Treblinka. In both cases the Hiwis stayed and fought. So, there’s your answer.

            “And would not these Hiwis be fearful of what might happen to them once “the exterminations” were over, and the camps dismantled. The holocaust proponents always tell us that Operation Rheinhardt was so secret that all evidence of what happened had be destroyed; all witnesses silenced; and the camps, not just razed to the ground, but completely obliterated.”

            See above.

            “In addition, the personnel ratios inside these three camps is all wrong for security at alleged “death camps”. At each location, we have 30 SS officers ( of which no more than 20-or-so were ever on duty at the same time); 120 Hiwis ( of which about 80 were ever on duty at the same time ); plus between 600 and 1,000 Jewish forced workers inside the camp. With trains arriving, and depositing hundreds of Jewish victims at the ramp, would it not have been possible ( even likely – considering that they were all destined for death anyway ) for this vast number of Jews to completely overwhelm the SS men, leaving the Hiwis leaderless, and thus prone to joining the revolt or fleeing for their lives.”

            The SS counted on deception and then brutality where deception did not suffice. Most of the handling of baggage was done by Jewish laborers who, on pain of death, went along with the deception.
            Also, the transports were filled with the sick and dying people who were transported under terrible conditions. Only one transport was allowed in the camp at a time, leaving other transports to sit. Sometimes, based on transport schedules and conflicts, trips that took days that should take hours. These people were deprived of fresh water, food, proper sanitation and clean air. As a consequence they were in no condition to fight (though individual acts of courage did sometimes happen. One deportee managed to stab an SS guard on the ramp and mortally wound him. I always admired that, wanting to go down fighting).

            “No – if these were “death camps”, then security would be completely in the hands of a sizeable force of reliable SS men ( several hundred in fact – if you’ve got 1000 hostile Jews to control, plus many others arriving day-by-day ). If you did deploy Hiwis, then these men would be only be given guard duties at the outer perimeter of these facilities – where they cannot see, hear, or interfere with what is going on inside the camp.”

            The Hiwis in the execution area were under the direct supervision of the SS. The rest of the time they did what you are saying….guarding the outer perimeter.
            You are not taking into account the man power shortage the camp SS experienced when the war started. They did have to rely on auxiliaries. The SS preferred ethnic Germans but did utilize others for camp duty.

            “The personnel ratios are completely nuts for an alleged “death camp”, but are quite sensible for a harmless transit camp, where only low-level security is required.”

            OK, back to the transit camp “theory.”

            By any chance, do you have any information on where these Jews went?

            I’m going to say no.

            Why would workers at a “transit camp” revolt, Talbot? Wouldn’t these “workers” have the expectation of being reunited with their families and friends? Wouldn’t an uprising short circuit that possibility?

            Comment by Jeff K. — August 31, 2016 @ 1:54 pm

    • ” One of the eyewitnesses, a Soviet Jew named Alexander Pechersky, described the mass murders…”

      Pechersky was a Soviet Red Army soldier who was captured by the Germans on the Eastern Front. Now, if the Nazis were planning to exterminate the entire Jewish Race – and the Einsatzgruppen were active inside the Soviet Union, killing every Jew they could lay their hands on, then why did the Germans take him ( along with many other captured Soviet Jewish soldiers ) all the way westwards to an alleged “death camp” – where they didn’t kill them, but set them to work in the forests outside the camp!

      This is where the extermination legend breaks down, once again – Pechersky and his men were based in Sobibor for quite some time, and even organised a successful escape attempt. So would the SS have permitted military trained, and dangerous Jews to organise a revolt, when the supposed Nazi policy was not only to exterminate the Jews, but to eliminate every potential hostile threat to German forces in the rear zones.

      Comment by Talbot — August 27, 2016 @ 3:42 pm

  3. The more I look into this and the more I hear the guides tell their story the more I don’t believe their version of anything. You have a 30 foot chimney which is way out of proportion to the visable structure underneath it. Something needs to support that huge chimney structure. Is this picture a fake? The more I study this the more questions I have. The stories that the Germans had to burn or destroy the evidence is always mentioned in the hoax stories WHY? The sign over Auschwitz ” work will set you free” doesn’t mean that, all this it doesn’t mean that, crap is nonsense. The sign above Auschwitz meant what it said. People were set free in these camps after they were rehabilitated for whatever their “sins” of the past.

    Comment by rizolitv — August 27, 2016 @ 11:17 am

    • You wrote: “The sign over Auschwitz ” work will set you free” doesn’t mean that, all this it doesn’t mean that, crap is nonsense. The sign above Auschwitz meant what it said. People were set free in these camps after they were rehabilitated for whatever their “sins” of the past.”

      I wrote about “Arbeit macht Frei” at
      https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/arbeit-macht-frei-what-does-it-stand-for/

      Comment by furtherglory — August 27, 2016 @ 11:24 am

    • You’re quite right – there is something funny about that massive chimney that looms high above a building that looks no more substantial than your next-door neighbour’s garden shed.

      That’s obviously some sort of factory chimney – not a crematorium stack. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the Soviets pasted the chimney on to the photo in order to emphasise the message of vast numbers of cremations from mass killings. If the building was burnt down by the retreating Germans, then we’ve only got the evidence from the Soviets that this building actually existed at Majdanek.

      But I do like the story about the SS man taking a bath in an alcove just off the crematorium while hundreds of corpses were being consumed in the adjacent furnaces. I wonder if he got one of the sondercommandos to soap and scrub his back for him – and I bet it was top-quality soap made from Jewish fat sent over directly from Doctor Spanner’s human soap factory at Danzig.

      Comment by Talbot — August 27, 2016 @ 12:29 pm

      • I’m sure Dr. Mengele was seen there making sure he had plenty of victims to operate on for ill gotten gains.
        Apparently he was seen and commented about in every camp horror story, he must be Godlike, as he was omnipresent.

        JR

        Comment by Jim Rizoli — August 27, 2016 @ 12:53 pm

  4. Burning a building containing people (alive or dead) is NOT an effective way to dispose of bodies, or to cremate them. It can produce the deaths of any of the people who are alive at the time of the burning.

    Comment by Jett Rucker — August 27, 2016 @ 10:47 am

  5. Quote
    “Right next to the room, at Majdanek, which has the 5 ovens, there is an alcove, or room open on one side, which has a large concrete bathtub. According to my tour guide, this tub was used by the SS man in charge of the ovens, when he took a bath. In the shower room adjacent to the other gas chambers at Majdanek, there are two similar concrete bathtubs where the prisoners were dipped into disinfectant before taking a shower. The reconstructed gas chamber in the crematorium resembles a shower room.”

    This must of been written by the same person that says the swimming pool at Auschwitz was for the fire brigade,….LOL
    This room was obviously created to bathe all the people who were passing through who needed it for fumigation and hygienic purposes, to think that we are that stupid to think they would build a private bathtub for an SS officer is ridiculous.

    Now the TRUTH….
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=1009&play=120#watch

    The book about it….
    http://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?page_id=5

    Enjoy….

    Jim Rizoli
    CCFIILE.COM
    IHR.ORG
    VHO.ORG

    Comment by jrizoli — August 27, 2016 @ 10:04 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: