Scrapbookpages Blog

October 25, 2016

The TWO confessions of Rudolf Hoess

Filed under: Uncategorized — furtherglory @ 12:31 pm

Why did Rudolf Hoess, the Commandant of the Auschwitz camp, write TWO confessions?

The first confession signed by Hoess was labeled by the Allies as Nuremberg Document No-1210. It was an 8-page typewritten document written in German. Hoess wrote the date 14.3.1946 2:30 (March 14, 1946 2:30 a.m.) next to his signature. This date was three days after his capure on March 11, 1946. Hoess had been beaten half to death; alcohol had been poured down his throat, and he had been kept awake for three days and nights before he finally signed this confession at 2:30 in the morning.

A second affidavit signed by Rudolf Hoess on April 5, 1946 was labeled by the Allies at the Nuremberg IMT as document PS-3868. It was a typewritten document, about 2 and a quarter pages long, written in English.

Another document, also labeled PS-3868, was purported to be the English translation of the original deposition given by Hoess in German. The second document was the one that was entered into the proceedings of the Nuremberg IMT.

During his cross-examination of Rudolf Hoess, American prosecutor Col. Harlan Amen quoted from the second affidavit which was alleged to be the English translation of a deposition given by Hoess in German. After reading each statement made by Hoess in his affidavit, Col Amen asked Hoess if this was what he had said and Hoess answered “Jawohl.” [the English equivalent would be “Yes, indeed.”]

You can read more about Rudolf Hoess on my website at http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/History/Articles/RudolfHoess.html

15 Comments »

  1. Many years ago when Amazon had different comment section a bit different then now, I use to comment a ton about the holocaust. Some of the dodo heards, one in particular used the Hoess book, testimony as his gold standard for victory. The guy was an idiot. Anyway, a Canadian women dirtbag complains about my post, my “tone” dealing with her and as a result tons of my past post were deleted AND I was suspended from Amazon for about 5 years until I protested, I am finally back commenting about book purchases after years being suspended by these Jewish meatballs who have one purpose in life and that is to censor anything that doesn’t agree with their historical views.

    Comment by rizolitv — October 26, 2016 @ 10:58 am

  2. “This collection brings alive with exceptional force the real politics behind critical theory. It highlights the range and sophistication of a vast array of intelligence reports about the structures of power and domination under National Socialist rule, compiled through the teamwork of Franz Neumann, Herbert Marcuse, and Otto Kirchheimer. Their cool objectivity is remarkable, and reminds us just how indebted we remain to their pioneering work.”–Duncan Kelly, University of Cambridge

    Excuse me……but The Frankfurt School were German Jewish intellectuals comitted to the cultural Marxist takeover and destruction of Western (Christian) civilization so that a future generation of misguided “progressives” like themselves can build a new utopian society on it’s ashes. As promoters of Italian Communist philosopher Antonio Gramsci’s “slow march through the institutions” they were totally devoid of any “cool objectivity” when it came to the intelligence work they did for the OSS during the war and the organization of and evidence they prepared for the Nurembur trial afterwards. Here is my finger Professor Duncan Kelley of Cambrisge, please pull it. https://www.amazon.com/Secret-Reports-Nazi-Germany-Contribution-ebook/dp/B00DQO5UUW

    Comment by who dares wings — October 25, 2016 @ 2:02 pm

  3. Fg… Read what you have posted very carefully and ask yourself does it accurately talk about these events.

    1) No one claims he wrote these. The first statement was extracted via torture… No one argues this but he didn’t write it himself.

    2) The 2nd was result of a 2nd interrogation.Robert Storey’s interrogation to be exact. He was not tortured for this statement though.

    3) Is first statement is both in agreement with his 2nd Interrogation statement and what has been written in his memoirs.

    4) His testimony fits well with Broads, whom was never tortured and when given the chance he retracted nothing.

    I would recommend you go to Nizkor -> People -> h -> Hoess -> Frequently Asked Questions and read what is there.

    Comment by Denying-History — October 25, 2016 @ 1:40 pm

    • You wrote: “I would recommend you go to Nizkor -> People -> h -> Hoess -> Frequently Asked Questions and read what is there.”

      I went to the Nizkor website and read the following:

      Begin quote

      The [Nizkor] website was founded by Ken McVay[2] as a central Web-based archive for the large numbers of documents made publicly available by the users of the newsgroup alt.revisionism and gifted to B’nai Brith Canada in 2010.[citation needed]

      The site also archives numerous postings made to the newsgroup since the early 1990s. It does not archive every single posting ever made to the newsgroup; rather, the maintainers of the web site have selected various messages for display that are seen as presenting “factual” information about the Holocaust;[3] or, in the case of some posters, about the authors of the messages themselves.[citation needed]

      In addition to providing an extensive archive of documents regarding the Holocaust, including the transcripts of the 1st Nuremberg Tribunal,[4] the Nizkor Project also seeks to expose the activities of Holocaust revisionists themselves.[5] Based on the postings to the newsgroup over the years, it has compiled extensive writings from self-proclaimed revisionists, including David Irving,[6] Ernst Zündel,[7] Michael A. Hoffman II, and others. Among the various pieces of information stored at Nizkor is a sound recording of an answering machine message allegedly made by white supremacist Tom Metzger, encouraging various individuals to “take action” against “Zinkor [sic] on the Internet.”[8]

      End quote

      The Nizkor website is as old as the hills. It was virtually the only Holocaust website when it started. I was not aware that this website is still up.

      Back in the dim past, I used to participate in writing on the newsgroup called alt.revisionism.

      I was not aware that this news group is still in existence. News groups are a thing of the past. I have gone far beyond discussing the Holocaust on news groups.

      Comment by furtherglory — October 25, 2016 @ 1:58 pm

      • Follow the instructions provided please.

        Comment by Denying-History — October 25, 2016 @ 2:12 pm

        • You wrote: “Follow the instructions provided please.”

          I don’t know what “insctructions” you are talking about.

          Every time you write a comment, the reader must go to the previous comment to find out what you are talking about, and even then, sometimes I can’t find the previous comment.

          Comment by furtherglory — October 25, 2016 @ 3:46 pm

          • Nizkor -> People -> h -> Hoess -> Frequently Asked Questions

            Comment by Denying-History — October 25, 2016 @ 5:22 pm

    • I went to Nizkor and read this page:
      http://www.nizkor.org/faqs/auschwitz/auschwitz-faq-04.html

      Everything on Nizkor is extremely outdated. The material on this website was written before you were born. You need to find a more modern website.

      Comment by furtherglory — October 25, 2016 @ 2:10 pm

      • Nizkor was created in the 1990’s so I am not sure what you expected… This website was created with a focus on another era of denial, well before it was dead and the notable deniers slid into some type of semi-denial.

        That aside I again direct you to the Hoess FAQ of Nizkor… It again will cover the same things I have stated, though it will cover a bit more.

        Comment by Denying-History — October 25, 2016 @ 2:17 pm

  4. The Nuremburg trial was juducial farce from start to finish. A Polish Jew named Raphael Lemkin, who had been brought to NYC by the Carnegie Foundation to prepare a book about German war atrocities entitled Axis Rule in Occupierd Europe wherin the word “genocide” first appeared, was approached by another Jew named Murray C. Bernays. Lt. Col. Bernays, the ex-brother-in-law of Edward “The Father of Spin” Bernays used Lemkin’s new idea to prepare the ex post facto collective guilt and criminal conspiracy cases against the Germans that were used to hang them. Once they were hung, the Jewish head of the U.S. Dept. of War Crimes Lt. Col. Mickey Marcus turned down an upgrade to Brigidier General in order to change his name and uniform and slip off to Palestine to train Zionist terrorists in the Hagannah and the Palmach. Once the state of Israel was declared in l947 Marcus became the first general of a Jewish army since the Macabees. He was most likely fragged by another Jew for reasons that remain a mystery. He is only soldier buried in the cemetary at West Point who died fighting under foreign flag and this is just the tip of Nuremburg trial bullshit and bias.

    Comment by who dares wings — October 25, 2016 @ 1:35 pm

  5. This and MANY other politically useful confessions are/have been/will be obtained by torture, rewards, inducements, etc.

    Same as outside captivity.

    Comment by Jett Rucker — October 25, 2016 @ 1:15 pm

  6. Holocaust True Believers, who are desperate to prove the Holocaust, use these two Confession, obtained by torture, to validate their claims.

    Comment by furtherglory — October 25, 2016 @ 12:37 pm

    • I see how heads up a person is to our movement when they start using the Hoess statements.
      Not very heads up…

      Comment by rizolitv — October 25, 2016 @ 2:17 pm

      • Maybe FG should be a bit more careful in this… More so then I.

        She is the one who has said both confessions were through torture… Though only one of them was, and this was by means of beating.

        Otherwise nothing similar was done during the American interrogation.

        Comment by Denying-History — October 25, 2016 @ 7:13 pm

    • “use these two Confession, obtained by torture,”

      Only one confession was obtained by torture. They are not really proof of much, they are really only used as a means of corroboration with hoess’s memoir.

      Comment by Denying-History — October 25, 2016 @ 2:18 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: