Scrapbookpages Blog

December 23, 2016

Christine Flowers is a lawyer.

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust, Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — furtherglory @ 6:42 am
My photo of the gate into the Dachau camp

My photo of the gate into the Dachau concentration camp

The title of my blog post today is the last sentence in a news article, which you can read in full at

http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20161223_Flowers__Truth_is_the_antidote_for_the_poison_of_Holocaust_denial.html

So she’s a lawyer. And I’m not. So what does that make me? Dog shit?

The following quote is from the news article written by Christine Flowers:

Begin quote

Ironically, though, the [newspaper] column elicited something that I didn’t see coming. Apathy is one thing, and so is nationalistic bravado in the wake of Donald Trump’s victory, but the response that I got from a man named Joe was so unexpected, I had to reread it a few times just to make sure it wasn’t a joke.

Joe wrote me a long email that started off with a compliment: “Christine, obviously you seem to be a very caring person with your article.” And then, like Joe Frazier landing one of those deadly left hooks on your weak side, he wrote: “But, of course, you use some of the same propaganda that we have heard for 70 years about the Jews and their genocide and the 6 million.”

And he proceeded to explain to me how the Holocaust was a lie, and “there were no gas chambers.” To make sure I believed him, Joe helpfully provided links to support his thesis, most of which included the word “hoax.”

End quote

The article continues with this quote:

Begin quote

The thing is, I don’t even feel good that my post [on Facebook] ridiculing Joe was “liked” over 250 times and that my old law professor suggested I should win the Nobel Prize for Literature.

I keep coming back to the idea that there are still people out there, people with thousands of Facebook friends like Joe, who believe the Holocaust never happened.

You’ll sigh and raise your eyebrows and try to convince me that this is just a fringe element of society and that, of course, most educated people believe that Auschwitz, Dachau and Treblinka existed in stone and brick and mortar and not simply as the architecture of fantasy. Of course, that’s true.

But it’s not enough to say these are the fringe elements in society, these deniers of Germany’s great shame, just as it’s not enough to say that anyone who thinks slaves were well-treated by their “masters” is a lobotomized moron.

End quote

29 Comments »

  1. Where the story continues…
    https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t1193823/#post13861493

    JR

    Comment by jrizoli — January 3, 2017 @ 3:09 pm

  2. Joe Rizoli vs Christine Flowers….
    It made our paper today.
    http://www.voy.com/241653/305.html?z=1

    JR

    Comment by jrizoli — December 31, 2016 @ 10:33 pm

  3. I notice that Jim is calling Mauthausen “transit camps” in a reply in that article. I think I’ve noticed Jim claim this before.

    ==================================================================================================
    highwaybox • 2 days ago
    For those holocaust deniers visit one of the hundreds of concentration camps in Europe that existed during WWII. On our trip to Austria back in 2002, our group was escorted to Mauthausen Concentration Camp. Perhaps you would accept the horrible truth after seeing piles of shoes from those tortured souls who didn’t survive.
    7 • Reply•Share ›

    JJRIZO Rizoli highwaybox • a day ago
    Piles of shoes doesn’t prove anything….are you a specialist in finding items that are said to be involved in a sinister act? These camps were transits camps and they became a collector of piles of clothes and shoes and other personal items that ended up left behind.

    JR
    2 • Reply•Share ›
    ==================================================================================================

    Why are you calling Mauthausen “transit camps”, Jim?

    People who talk about the shoes are usually referring to Majdanek, not Mauthausen; but maybe Mauthausen has a pile of shoes exhibit as well. Majdanek partly served as a transit camp – even in the Holocaustian narrative. Where has Mauthausen served as a transit camp? Transit camp to where? Mauthausen consisted of mostly work camps as far as anyone, Holocaustian or Revisionist, is concerned. Why do you call Mauthausen “transit camps”, Jim?

    Does Jim help any cause by confusing things? Does Jim advance any Revisionist “transit camp” theses by miscomprehending what those theses even are? Whose agenda are you playing to, Jim? Does Jim know of any evidence of the Mauthausen complex being transit camps? Has anyone other than Jim claimed the Mauthausen camps were “transit camps”?

    With friends like Jim, Revisionists need no enemies.

    Comment by blake121666 — December 25, 2016 @ 11:44 am

    • I think I know what I’m talking about….
      Just making a point not really concentrating on that one camp.
      I’m just saying some camps were major transits camps.
      Really now… you are going to me up about the HoloHoax….LOL

      JR

      Comment by jrizoli — December 25, 2016 @ 1:39 pm

      • Revisionists usually only mention “transit camps” w.r.t. the AR camps which were generally not work camps and apparently served no other function than the alleged extermination claimed of them.

        Your bringing in the term “transit camps” in reply to someone bringing up the general term “concentration camps” would only confuse that person into thinking that you are claiming that “concentration camps” in general were nothing but “transit camps”.

        The weakest part of the Revisionist narrative is this “transit camp” hypothesis – and you jump right into spouting the very weakest Revisionist argument of all on the mere mention of “concentration camps”.

        Concentration camps existed, work camps existed – acknowledge this for that person and inform him of the Revisionist position – particularly how it does not deny the existence of camps. Don’t jump right into an area that I bet the person isn’t even aware about – he never even brought the AR camps up – he in fact brought up Mauthausen. There was no reason for you to jump into the “transit camp” issues.

        BTW, Mauthausen – particularly Gusen – was a particularly brutal work camp for Jews and non-Jews alike. No one denies its existence or its horrific death rate from work (not epidemics).

        Your blithe “transit camps” crapola shifted the discussion on to the weakest part of the Revisionist position – which wasn’t even brought up and probably unknown about! If he had brought up, say Treblinka, you could have THEN brought up your “transit camp” contention (you know, the contention with zero positive evidence to back it up).

        Comment by blake121666 — December 25, 2016 @ 5:23 pm

        • You wrote: “Don’t jump right into an area that I bet the person isn’t even aware about – he never even brought the AR camps up – he in fact brought up Mauthausen.”

          I have written several blog posts abut Mauthausen:
          https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/tag/mauthausen/

          Comment by furtherglory — December 26, 2016 @ 8:22 am

          • The HoloHuxsters have to have all the camps being death camps because if they don’t they don’t have the numbers to add up to the magical 6 million.
            Just a reminder for those not really following the story………in the beginning they said there were thousands of “death” camps, then chopped down to hundreds, then to 22, then … none on German soil……then it was said only six camps were death camps all out of Germany….They were…Auschwitz,Belzec,Chelmo,Majdanek, Sobibor,Treblinka. Of course now the problem comes in with the transit camps that really throw the figures way off….
            Far cry from the thousands of camps they said in the beginning of their HoloHoax story. So now the problem is trying to divvy up the death figures that will add up to the 6 million lie.
            The problem with lies are you keep having to rework your lie to make it fit in the end, which creates a paper trail that stays with you….
            So what was that about that 6 million, lets go back to the beginning and compare what you said then…LOL
            Lets not forget that they said most in these camps they had “homicidal” gas chambers or whatever other silly death weapon was used to kill all these people…. Where are all the people that said they had these facilities now?

            JR

            Holocausthandbooks.com
            IHR.ORG
            VHO.ORG
            CODOH.COM
            CCFIILE.COM

            Comment by Jim Rizoli — December 26, 2016 @ 9:12 am

            • I don’t see how these ovens could’ve functioned for that purpose. I read up on the ovens. The bricks are made from a high carbon fiber,to withstand the heat ( they have to be replaced frequently. I never see that mentioned). The flame has to at a consistent temperature,for an extended,set period of time. The flame comes from above the body. The flame is produced by electricity rather than fuel. Then they talk about the equipment being able to handle it. You need air ducts,circulation fans,flue ducts and circulation pumps.

              Now they were probably not that advanced in the cremation science back then,but I’ve never heard any of this bought up when people talk about the ovens.

              Even if they would talk about the bricks used on the ovens,it would go a long way in backing up their ovens. A pizza sounds more advanced than the ovens people said the nazis used.

              If they torched up close to 6 million people,they went through a serious amount of bricks

              Comment by Tim — December 26, 2016 @ 1:55 pm

              • The ovens had to relined after around 3000 cremations…..do the numbers.
                The numbers revisionist numbers line up more with the death figures.

                JR

                Comment by jrizoli — December 26, 2016 @ 2:52 pm

                • Okay. They want to put a case on everyone else,why haven’t we heard of any brick layers being charged?

                  Why haven’t they tried to put a case on the company ( or its staff and management), that made the oven bricks? They wanna charge an elderly lady who was an RTO at one of the prisons. This shit don’t make good sense.

                  Comment by Tim — December 26, 2016 @ 5:53 pm

              • Tim – From what I can gather from the holocaust proponents, it is only Auschwitz and Majdanek which were equipped with brick-built, and fire-bricked lined furnaces.

                There were brick-built crematoriums in the main concentrations camps within Germany itself, i.e.;- Dachau, Sachsenhausen, Buchenwald etc. but these places today are not designated as “extermination camps”, and thus the cremations at these sites were purely of inmates whose deaths had very little – if anything – to do with any holocaust.

                The holocausters proclaim that there were only a total of 6 extermination camps in existence where it is alleged human beings were purposely, and systematically, put to death in massive numbers. Today, they all lie within Poland. And they are named;- Auschwitz/Birkenau, Majdanek, Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec and Chelmno.

                Well, at the four latter camps, it is alleged that all the human remains were burnt with cut timber on large pyres constructed out in the open air ( I don’t believe it myself – but this is how the official legend goes! )

                But it is claimed by the holocaust proponents that there were up to 6 million Jews who were exterminated during the “holocaust”. And the official numbers for Auschwitz/Birkenau and Majdanek are 1.1 million, and 78,000 respectively.

                Therefore, the number of human souls who were cremated in proper, purpose brick-built cremation ovens totals less than 1.2 million. But even an enormous figure of over a million corpses to be disposed of in the time frame that we’ve been given would completely overwhelm the capacity of the furnace ovens. You are quite right, Tim, the SS would have to constantly replace the bricks in lengthy maintenance schedules, and thus the ovens would be closed down on a regular basis.

                And what happened to the bodies of the other 4.8 million is anyone’s guess. Were they all burnt to ashes on open pyres ?

                Comment by Talbot — December 26, 2016 @ 3:39 pm

                • Even at Auschwitz and Majdanek, it is claimed that they were doing “outdoor burnings” on a limited scale in 1941/42 and for a brief period over the spring of 1944. But the information is so garbled and vague, and the testimonies so laughably weak, that its probably best not to give too much credence to these kinds of tales until verifiable evidence is produced.

                  Comment by Talbot — December 26, 2016 @ 3:50 pm

                • Like I said,”don’t see how that could be done. There’s no way to keep the temperature of the flame consistent,and the area it needs to be directly focused on.

                  Comment by Tim — December 26, 2016 @ 5:49 pm

                • I’ve always told people that since the number of people that were “gassed”,is constantly changing,they should put that on the commodities market,and trade it as a commodity.

                  Seems to me that these,”death camps”, would have to employ full time brick layers. I read where bricks have to be changed out in the ovens for them to be effective. Why haven’t we heard of any brick layers going on trial?

                  From what I read,the temperature has to consistent and directly put on the body. How are they gonna be successful in torching a body,if they build a bonfire?

                  6 million has always bothered me. Now that I find out how often the bricks have to be replaced in the ovens,I figure somewhere along the line,somebody would make mention of the company that made the bricks.

                  I’ve been trying to figure out why Germany is always the bad guy. I’m still trying to figure it out. From what I’ve read,this goes way back before WW1. Seems like the world has made Germany,” the red headed stepchild”.

                  Comment by Tim — December 26, 2016 @ 5:46 pm

        • You wrote: “If he had brought up, say Treblinka, you could have THEN brought up your “transit camp” contention (you know, the contention with zero positive evidence to back it up).”

          I have written several blog posts about Treblinka:
          https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2015/11/07/the-story-of-treblinka-transit-camp-or-extermination-center/

          Comment by furtherglory — December 26, 2016 @ 8:29 am

  4. A few more replies to Ms. HoloHoax believer Christine Flowers

    Dear Christine –

    It was sad to read you misconstruing facts – Holohoax Truth tellers do NOT deny the holocaust transpired, it did not occur as we are indoctrinated to believe. Have you ever asked yourself why the jewish fake holocaust is preached to kids, yet there is nary a mention of the worst holocaust – the Holomodor?

    I won’t bother arguing, you are what is referred to as a “useful idiot.” The powers that be use wanna-be do gooders to further their false agendas and propagate misinformation under a righteous back patting.

    The Greatest Story Never Told is a multi-hour documentary focusing on the truth of WW11, not just the truth about Hitler. I was so impacted by the reams of lies, I cried for days after viewing. The film is well documented and sourced.

    Should you have the courage to view it in its entirety, you will question everything set forth by the lamestream media, every fact you’ve ever been taught. Dozens of friends who have watched The Greatest Story Never Told were horrified, shocked and apoplectic.

    I wish for you the courage to actually investigate the matrix we reside in.

    Regards,
    Tracy
    former Sheeple like you, now awake

    FREDRICK TOBEN WROTE:

    Hi Christine – I just read your column – http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20161223_Flowers__Truth_is_the_antidote_for_the_poison_of_Holocaust_denial.html

    We featured the factual deficiency of the Lipstadt book from an Australian perspective here: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org/newsletters/Newsletter%20995a.pdf

    In your article you fail to mention the fact that legal constraints are imposed on anyone questioning the Holocaust – and your huff-and puff- and bluff bluster response reminds me of my teaching days where I saw colleagues adopt a similar tactic whenever any students in their honest but naïve way exposed that teacher’s moral and intellectual bankruptcy, i.e. a teacher who did not set a personal example to his students. All the teacher could do to save face is to behave and respond the way you responded in your column – and that is sad.

    Still, best wishes.

    Fredrick Töben
    AND

    CHRISTINE RESPONDED TO TOBEN:

    Actually, Lipstadt was victorious under a legal standard that made it almost a foregone conclusion that a Holocaust denier like Irving would win. That she won in a highly skewed legal forum, with significant handicaps, proves that she was successful in showing Irving to be a thin skinned liar whose reputation is destroyed beyond repair, and have exposed his supporters as equally dishonest. Regards

    Christine
    FREDRICK TOBEN RESPONDED AGAIN TO CHRISTINE:

    Christine – I wasn’t certain whether you were addressing me because the way you begin your note indicates there is something uncivil about you.

    What a sweeping statement you make below, and you say nothing about Lipstadt’s errors-lies in her book, which John Bennett pointed out in a letter to her.

    Only a fool represents himself in court, as did Irving, and perhaps it was hubris getting the better of him when he agreed to have the matter heard by a judge alone rather than by a judge and jury.

    Your concluding sentence is more proof of your faulty reasoning powers because you fail to remind your readers about other legal processes, for example that women, once found guilty of heresy, were burnt at the stake, or bagged up and thrown into a river – if the bag floated, then that proved she was using witchcraft to defeat the just sentence; if it sank immediately, then that proved the sentence was just!

    This witch-trial mentality is reflected in your logic and it does not really astound me with what vehemence you give vent to your view-point, almost as if your mind has been trimmed on the win-lose, them-us hateful mindset that all too often emerges from absorbing the Talmudic thought-structures.

    Besides your explicit sexual references in your article, I worry what on earth you would think of Richard Wagner’s Der Ring des Nibelungen.

    Best wishes. Fredrick Töben

    Comment by jrizoli — December 24, 2016 @ 10:51 am

  5. Here is her reply to me……
    “dealing with the filth of denier beliefs. Discuss amongst yourselves in your sick, quiet little basements”

    Merry Christmas

    This woman has no class and no idea what the truth is and doesn’t really care…..

    JR

    Comment by jrizoli — December 24, 2016 @ 9:21 am

  6. My brother was the one that wrote to her…

    Here are two of us that replied…

    FROM JIM RIZOLI
    http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20161223_Flowers__Truth_is_the_antidote_for_the_poison_of_Holocaust_denial.html

    I have been following your discussion about the Holocaust and your outrageous response to Joe. Actually pretty sad what your replies were to him, and how you responded to him in such a derogatory, profane, ignorant, and hostile way you did.

    Christine, you do know we Revisionist, whom we have been maliciously labeled as Holocaust Deniers, don’t say “the Holocaust Never happened” we just don’t believe in the Jewish Version of what they said happened….. big difference. I would think a good journalist would know the difference but apparently not in your case. Unless you are deliberately trying to mislead your readers. I hope that is not what you’re trying to do here, but you would fool me in your response to Joe and your last diatribe.

    Apparently you didn’t read any of the links Joe sent you which would of explained exactly what we Holocaust Revisionist are really saying.
    But now you want to spread this silly propaganda about what some Jews said happened to them when they weren’t even privy to the information themselves. They just copied what other said and used their information for their stories when given the opportunity to do so, no one would check to see if the stories were even true. So we have to endure the slanders and lies by people like you that make a living spreading the lies that the Jews seen to have not let go of even after these 75 years.

    For instance….. At one time they said Jews were made into soap, their skin into lampshades and their heads were shrunk, all by the way which are still taught to children today when the “Holocaust” survivors go and visit the schools to teach them about the event, or their version of it anyway.

    These silly stories have all been exposed as lies as was the fake “gas” chamber at Auschwitz camp 1 which was built AFTER the war, but I guess they make for good story telling to people like yourself that don’t do their own research but like the “fake” news aspect of it. By the way the Gas chamber stories have had several revisions from the initial accounts taken from those who said they existed. So as not to waste more of my precious time on someone who really doesn’t care for what the real truth is you can continue on your fantasy writing and just be happy you get a pay check for leaving the truth behind in your writing adventures through life. What more can I say to someone who comes off as a Journalist who doesn’t care to check their facts or sources.

    Some good links for you below if you ever care to do some good research on the topic of the Holocaust.

    Jim Rizoli
    CCFIILE.COM
    Holocausthandbooks.com
    IHR.ORG
    VHO.ORG
    CODOH.COM

    FROM DIANE KING

    Ms. Flowers:

    I have become aware of your editorial (because it certainly wasn’t news reporting) concerning your all-knowing view on ‘holocost denial’, (misspelling intentional). That you claim to KNOW what those of us who reject the hollywood version of the hoax believe or why or how. That WE have done our research after a lifetime of having the politically correct version, the lies of the hoax shoved down our throats (it being worse today than when we grew up – so much so, I claim that teaching about the hoax the way it is done today is in the realm of child abuse). But those of you who willfully, ignorantly proclaim at the top of your lungs, how RIGHT is your position without allowing the honest discourse is appalling and unprofessional for what GOOD JOURNALISM is supposed to be. (Now I have to commend you for allowing us to have our say when most of your ilk would prefer us censored at best and locked away at the worst.)

    I also see that you’re a lawyer. Maybe I’m naive to think that lawyers are supposed to be the ultimate investigators of the facts – — oh wait, that’s right – whatever it takes to win a case – THE FACTS BE DAMNED!!!! It is clear to me that being a lawyer may be a detriment to discovering ACTUAL FACT – but obviously you fail to realize that. You don’t even humbly admit you might NOT KNOW everything on this subject. We ‘deniers’ are ALWAYS learning and appreciate those who have suffered for their part in revealing this truth you reject.

    By the way, don’t break your arm patting yourselves on the back when congratulating yourselves on your profane response to Joe – for regurgitating the easy, politically correct mantra about the holocost in the face of a mountain of evidence that blights the traditional story. “So many testimonies, so many documents” you might say. You can reproduce error at the speed of light with the right kind of copier – volume doesn’t confirm truth or you would have listened to the multiple stories REJECTED by the PC filters of concentration camp inmates who tell of positive things that occurred in the camps, for example that belie the whole bogus claim of extermination camps.

    And incidentally, Dachau, Treblinka and Auschwitz – do you realize these were 3 different types of camps, performing different functions in different countries and that THAT distinction matters? Do you know ANYTHING outside of your own garbage-in-garbage-out education system (and I use the term ‘education’ lightly) about the true facts of the holocost?

    You said: “This poison is a communicable disease, and it infects a mind that hasn’t been inoculated against the lies. We need to keep talking about the Holocaust, which has a unique place in modern history, so that when the last survivor has died and there are no longer eloquent eyewitnesses to the carnage, we can neutralize the anti-Semitic provocations with powerful resolve and undeniable facts.” We contend that YOUR position as a prevaricator of lies (or the catch word these days is “fake news”) is appalling. I do agree that the hoax has a unique place in history as the BIGGEST HOAX OF THE 20th (and now) 21st CENTURY. Another false flag, an “… odious term” created for money making, and a rich business it is (there’s NO business like SHOAH business).

    I believe a number of responders have provided you with a selection of links as will I below (though it is clear you have ignored each and every offer to broaden your anything-goes, legal-addled mind). Yes, TRUTH is the only solution to what ails you – being woefully bereft of information by which you may derive AND LEARN the truth.

    I contend, Ms. Flowers that you are a willing victim of HOLOCOSTOMANIA: Subscribing to the politically correct view of the holocost without question or discussion – rots the brain, corrupts the morals and creates a psychopath. The only cure is the truth provided by those who oppose and contend against the wholesale force feeding and consequent perversion of the myth of the holocost. (Diane King)

    Diane King

    Comment by jrizoli — December 23, 2016 @ 4:30 pm

    • Jimbo “mad dog” Rizolli,don’t piss him off. Next time you write this gal,ask her if people that say the earth is flat,are in denial. Even though we have evidence to prove otherwise.

      Comment by Tim — December 23, 2016 @ 4:58 pm

  7. Christine Flowers wrote: “You’ll sigh and raise your eyebrows and try to convince me that this is just a fringe element of society and that, of course, most educated people believe that Auschwitz, Dachau and Treblinka existed in stone and brick and mortar and not simply as the architecture of fantasy. Of course, that’s true.”

    And most uneducated people believe that Holocaust revisionists deny that the camps at Auschwitz, Dachau and Treblinka existed (and still exist to a large extent as far as those at Auschwitz and Dachau are concerned). Writing that erroneous absurdity and “Joe helpfully provided links to support his thesis” shows that she didn’t even bother reading what Joe posted and so demolishes her image as an open-minded person.

    Interesting she mentioned Dachau, one of the camps miserably downgraded from “major death camp” to “plain concentration camp without any killing facility” only 15 years after the end of WW2…

    Comment by hermie — December 23, 2016 @ 2:48 pm

  8. Actually some slaves were given a wage. The master contracts them out. They work all day for the master,at night work for the people they were contracted to.

    All day in the field they are gonna be a bit sluggish. Give them incentive to work,even if they are dragging

    I’m not sure who the slave was,but a plantation overseer was fired by the plantation owner,for totally whipping the shit out of a slave. The slave was down for weeks,while he healed. The plantation owner knew the slave was stuck in bed,until he recovered from his injuries.

    I’m not saying all plantation owners and their overseers were Angels,but all the facts are not given on the history of slavery.

    Think about this. At the end of the war,some slaves actually became land owners. How were they gonna do that,if they didn’t have any money?

    Forget about Joe Lewis and his left hook. Let John L. Sullivan clip your ass. While we’re talking about Joe,why were he and Max Schmeling such close friends? Well I mean history would have people accept,all Krauts are racist. Max took it pretty hard when Joe died. Joe pretty much died broke. Max paid for his funeral. How come nobody ever brings that up?

    Comment by Tim — December 23, 2016 @ 1:40 pm

  9. ‘most educated people believe that Auschwitz, Dachau and Treblinka existed in stone and brick and mortar and not simply as the architecture of fantasy. Of course, that’s true.’

    Well most holocaust deniers believe that these places existed in reality too so what is she really saying? It’s the typical sleight of hand that seeks to deflect the real issue by intervening with another angle. It doesn’t work, we are not that silly. It’s not that they existed but what they were used for and when it comes to the claims of gas chambers and six million dead jews she has shot herself in the foot because there is absolutely no proof of these.

    Surely she should be happy that 6m dead jews were in fact never in danger.

    Comment by mr b — December 23, 2016 @ 8:29 am

    • Well most holocaust deniers believe that these places existed in reality too

      Yes, absolutely — of course responsible revisionists do not dispute the existence of these camps — who does, actually? — only what allegedly happened there.

      People like her are just not worth the time.

      Comment by eah — December 23, 2016 @ 11:13 am

  10. After reading the entire article, it would appear that poor Christine is a very agitated and distressed young lady. She claims that after receiving the e-mail from Joe – who apparently didn’t use any belligerent or foul language, but just tried to explain a different version of events – she “took a shower to purge the intangible film of dust and disgust from my hands, and my eyes, and my heart”.

    Well, I can help Christine out here, by recommending soap made from ‘Pure Jewish Fat’. Its 100% effective, and cleanses your skin from any residual spots and marks of anti-Semitic dirt, and denier filth ( I believe today’s manufacturers have even developed the original recipe that SS Doctor Spanner was using for his bars of soap in his Polish factory in Gdansk. Because you can now purchase PJF in liquid form and squirt it directly on to your body from a hand-pressure dispenser.

    Christine is described as a lawyer, but I hate to think that she would use the following kind of language in a court of law:-

    ” F–k you ” ; ” lobotomized moron ” ; ” spew the product of their mind’s masturbation ” ; ” copulate with themselves ” ; ” vile and disgusting abortions of the intellect ” ; ” fetid, ugly stains “.

    If she did, then I’m quite certain that the flabbergasted, learned judge – after recovering from such an outburst – would glare down at her from the bench and address Ms. Flowers sternly; ” Councillor – retire to the bathroom immediately, and wash your mouth out with PJF.

    Comment by Talbot — December 23, 2016 @ 8:21 am

  11. ridiculing Joe

    Did she “ridicule” him by citing convincing proof of the ‘Holocaust’? — probably not — unfortunately ridicule is usually enough today — anyone with doubts gets the message.

    Comment by eah — December 23, 2016 @ 8:16 am

  12. There are 49 Comments on the article prefaced by “We encourage respectful comments but reserve the right to delete anything that doesn’t contribute to an engaging dialogue Help us moderate this thread by flagging comments that violate our guidelines
    Commenting policy | Comments FAQ” So we can see they’ve set it up so offended believers can snitch on the skeptics and get their comments removed. Instead of wasting time there trying to educate the uneducatable why not use it to send a card to one of these brave revisionists upon whose heads the wrath of the international Holocaust Industry has come down for challenging the disinformation they enforce by law.

    SEND A CHRISTMAS CARD TO A JAILED REVISIONIST

    Wolfgang FRÖHLICH (prisoner) – JVA Stein – Steiner Landstr 4 – A-3504 Kreims-Stein / Wachau – NO – AUSTRIA

    Axel Möller (prisoner) – JVA Bützow – Kühlungsborner Str. 29a – D-18246 Bützow – GERMANY

    Vincent Reynouard (recently convicted in France) – 12 Opyffe Ave. Welling Kent DA16 3HZ ENGLAND

    Siegfried Verbeke – Italiëlei 203b B-2000 Antwerp – BELGIUM

    Sylvia Stolz (prosecuted possibly jailed now) – Pfarrer-Grabmeier-Allee 10, D-85560 Ebersberg, GERMANY

    Dr. Ursula Haverbeck (prosecuted possibly jailed now) – Bretthorststr. 199, D-32602, Vlotho-Valdorf, GERMANY

    Prof. Prof. R. Faurisson (currently being prosecuted in France) 10, Rue de Normandie F-03200, Vichy, FRANCE

    Arnold Höfs, Dipl.-Kfm ( 80 year old prisoner). Schulenburger Landstr. 145 (JVA/Haus 8) 30165 Hannover GERMANY

    Horst Mahler (Released on medical leave): Weidenbusch 13, 14532 Kleinmachnow/Brandenburg GERMANY

    Comment by who dares wings — December 23, 2016 @ 7:43 am

    • Thanks for the info — is there a web site that tracks this?

      Comment by eah — December 23, 2016 @ 8:13 am

  13. The REAL crime is that many, if not most, of us remain in full possession of our civil rights, rather than being in jail, which is the only place fit for us.

    Comment by Jett Rucker — December 23, 2016 @ 7:42 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: