Scrapbookpages Blog

December 27, 2016

When I am old, I shall wear purple — and red

Filed under: Trump, Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — furtherglory @ 11:17 am
President Donald Trump

Donald J. Trump

The title of my blog post today is from a poem that I read many years ago. This was on my mind this morning, when I woke up, and remembered the day that I had voted for Hillary to be our next president — I wore purple and red that day: a red hat with a purple coat.

In the weeks before the election night, Wiki-Leaks was leaking news about the Democrats, but not about the Republicans. Wiki-Leaks was revealing bad thing about Hillary, but strangely, there were no leaks about Trump. It was at this time that TCM came out with film footage in which Trump revealed his “pussy grabbing” history. He said “when you’re a star, they let you do it. ”

Many people including me, think that Putin was involved with Wiki Leaks, and that he was “hacking” the election. It was Wiki Leaks that also revealed information about Hillary’s e-mail server and her e-mail messages. I knew that it was not a crime to have an e-mail server; I had such a server myself, at one time.

My voting place was less than a mile from my house — I could have walked there, but instead my son drove me there — in a red car. He parked the car near the door into the building and I walked up a long ramp, after declining a wheel chair. There was a very long hallway that we had to walk through.  There were no direction signs up yet, but there was a young woman there who gave us directions.

When we reached the polling place, I was asked if I needed help to mark my ballot, and to put it into the ballot box.  I declined all help — I wanted to do it myself.

After I voted, I was given a sticker to put on my coat, to show that I had voted. These stickers were in many different languages, including English. After voting, my son and I went to a local restaurant and had coffee along with a hearty meal.

As I sipped my coffee, I was hoping that I had just voted for the first woman president of the United States of America. The final count for the election showed that Hillary had gotten 2.9 million MORE votes than The Donald, but he won because of our electoral college voting system.

On the night of the election, all the pundits were predicting that Hillary would win the election. When I went to bed on the night of the election, Hillary had 2.3 million more votes than Trump, but all night long, Trump had been chanting that he would win. When I woke up, on the morning of the election, I found that Trump had been right: he had won the election.

How did Trump know that he would win? “When you are a star, they let you do it!”

62 Comments »

  1. @Mick:
    Yes just as I thought. Firstly, the Jan Sehn Institute reports have been thoroughly debunked by Germar Rudof who issued a challenge to their science, which they refused to defend.”

    Nonsense on the face of it.

    How did he “debunk” something he didn’t test?

    “2nd link: “Combating of Partisans and action against Jews in the District General of White Ruthenia” This is concerning Einsatzgruppen actions against partisans, mostly Jewish.”

    Uh, no. Anti-Partisan operations had code names, lists of villages destroyed, weapons captured….see any of that?
    Also, those operations didn’t target Jews specifically.

    “At the Erich Von Manstein trial, Defence lawyer & Historian R T Paget established that the claims made by the Einsatzgruppen were exagerated by a factor of 10: (MANSTEIN. His Campaigns And His Trial).”

    You didn’t really explain that very well.
    Paget made the argument that only 300 or so Jews could be killed in two or three days the Action is mentioned.
    The reality is that the killings took place from in November and December of 1941, with heaviest killing taking place on December 9th-15th.

    The bustling groups of Jews in the marketplace that Paget talked about?

    The Karaim, a group of Turks that practiced Judaism. They were not considered “racial Jews” and were spared.

    “3rd link is in German, I’m English.”

    Some people want the German as well.

    “4th link GAS VANS, are you serious?. Not one of these fictional vans has ever been found and when the ‘Museam of tolerence’ in America included a photo of one, David Stein/Cole pointed out that it was a furniture van which ran on ‘producer gas’, they immediately removed the exhibit.”

    Oh, I’m very serious. Gas vans are very well documented. You didn’t address the documentation.

    “As for The infamous “Vergasungskeller” “A single letter from SS-Hauptsturmführer BISCHOFF dated January 29, 1943 contains the word “Vergasungskeller” and is to this day the strongest evidence for the mass extermination hoax with cyanide (see Pressac page 211 ). The word has several possible translations, the most literal being a cellar where gas is released, or generated. It has been given the most sinister meaning possible by the exterminationists who insist that it must have been a place where people were gassed to death. But, the word is actually explained by a related letter, also from Bischoff, dated December 18, 1942 (see Pressac page 210 ) in which the very first sentence says: “Im Monat Dezember musste wegen Entlausung und Entwesung die Arbeit an mehreren Tagen ruhen” (“During the month of December work had to be stopped for several days because of delousing and disinfestation”). It is clear enough that the fumigations were occurring somewhere within the building. Or else, why would there have been any need to stop work? The work was actually stopped for days (Pressac actually mistranslated the text) and delayed completion of this urgently needed crematorium. The surrender of five million Soviet prisoners to the Germans by this time would have been a major reason for completing these Kremas as quickly as possible. But obviously, the need for delousing and disinfestation was even greater.” “Why did they not use the correct word ‘Gaskammer’ (Gas Chamber) Apart from its use in these documents, “Vergasungskeller” appears to be a totally non-existent word in German. It has no known technical meaning; it is not listed in any technical dictionary that anyone appears to know of, either on-line or in book form, for example, the Eurodicautom or http://www2.dict.cc (they even have a forum).”

    Blah, blah, blah.

    Where do fake shower heads and a gas tight door fit in?
    https://web.archive.org/web/20150323222749/http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/19430624-inventory/

    Anyway, my turn.

    The Hoefle Telegram:
    https://www.sobiborinterviews.nl/en/victims/hoefle-telegram

    Where did the Jews listed in the Telegram go? Where’s the proof?

    Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 7:24 pm

    • Shlomo. “How did he “debunk” something he didn’t test?” that’s the point, Germar Rudof did test Jan Sehns science and found it wanting. They didn’t even acknowlege that Prussian Blue staining resulted from the absorption of HCN into the iron oxcide present in the plaster/concrete of where it was used. They claimed it might be paint?.

      Who dealt with Jewish partisans, Einsatzgruppen of the SD. Regarding R T Paget, the impotance of his findings and acquital of Erich Von Manstein whom he defended is that during the trial Paget became skeptical of the claimed killing numbers by the SD.(Himmler also expressed doubt) In one instance he was able to check these figures. They had claimed to have killed 10,000 Jews in SIMFEROPOL and reported it clear of Jews. However, by cross checking it became clear that any supposed killing was limited to one single day (16th November) and that at most 300 assorted types of resistance personel were apparently shot. Paget received many letters denying this happened and was able to call several witnesses who had been billeted with Jewish families and who reported a fully functioning synagogue and of the Jewish market still carrying out commerce right up to the time Manstein left Crimea.It became apparent during the trial that Jews in SIMEROPOL were unaware of any special danger. Ohlendorf had reported not just SIMFEROPOL clear of Jews but also the whole of Crimea, which shows him to be a man prepared to claim anything his bosses wanted,Pages 168-174 of MANSTEIN His campaign and his trial.

      You later asked “where did they go” Well, according to the ‘Jewish Telegraph Agency’ 2 million Jews from the Baltic countries escaped across the Urals into the safety of the Russian interior before the Germans approached. This caused a scacity of Jewish labour, Hence: “Deportations of German and Czech Jews into Riga (Latvia) and Minsk (Belarus) have been dealt with in detail by Raul Hilberg, who also emphasizes in his three-volume study the economic importance of Jewish prisoners working in those territories. He writes, for example, of “a widespread demand for Jewish workers,” and that in Riga German and Latvian
      Jews worked for the SS, the army, the navy, the air force, the railroad, and in commercial enterprises.
      A Slovak Jew, Gisi Fleischman, reported in March of 1943 that in the region of Lublin (Poland), he encountered other Slovak Jews, as well as Belgian Jews.
      In 1942 Jews from Belgium, Netherlands and France arrived by train in Lvov (Lviv), Ukraine, according to testimony of the eyewitness I. Hertz provided in 1946 by the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee of the USSR.

      The French Communist underground newspaper Notre Voix reported in its April 1944 issue:
      ‘News that will please all the Jews of France was broadcast by Radio Moscow. Who among us has not had a brother, a sister, a spouse or a parent among those deported from Paris? And who will not rejoice when he hears that 8,000 Paris Jews have been rescued by the glorious Red Army! One of them reported on Radio Moscow how he was saved from death together with 8,000 other Paris Jews. They all found themselves in Ukraine at the time of the latest Soviet offensive, and the SS bandits wanted to shoot them before they left the country’. Jews were actually found all over eastern Europe after the war.

      I could continue but think this is not the forum for overly long explanations. In short what you have posted is long debunked claims and documents of doubtful authenticity.

      Comment by mick — December 29, 2016 @ 4:33 am

      • “Shlomo.”

        I really don’t understand this reference. Could you clarify?

        “How did he “debunk” something he didn’t test?” “that’s the point, Germar Rudof did test Jan Sehns science and found it wanting. They didn’t even acknowlege that Prussian Blue staining resulted from the absorption of HCN into the iron oxcide present in the plaster/concrete of where it was used. They claimed it might be paint?.”

        So, you are qualified to defend Rudolf’s results and critique the Poles? Or Richard Green?
        Yeah, I doubt it.

        “Who dealt with Jewish partisans, Einsatzgruppen of the SD.”

        Sorry, you are incorrect. The Einsatzgruppen’s original purpose (in the USSR, they also operated in Austria to secure government offices and in Poland to murder the Polish elite) was to execute Communist Party officials and other Communist Party elites, Jewish Communists in positions of authority, saboteurs, etc. They were not detailed to anti-partisan activity directly (though some did later). They were also told by Heydrich to incite pogroms against local Jews. Heydrich ordered the widespread shooting of Jewish males on July 2nd and in August to include Jewish women and children.
        Most of this killing occurred in the Summer and Fall, before any widespread partisan actions took place (these ramped up in 1942).

        “Regarding R T Paget, the impotance of his findings and acquital of Erich Von Manstein”

        Manstein was convicted, dumbass, not acquited. He actually served time in prison.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Erich_von_Manstein

        “whom he defended is that during the trial Paget became skeptical of the claimed killing numbers by the SD.(Himmler also expressed doubt) In one instance he was able to check these figures. They had claimed to have killed 10,000 Jews in SIMFEROPOL and reported it clear of Jews.However, by cross checking it became clear that any supposed killing was limited to one single day (16th November)and that at most 300 assorted types of resistance personel were apparently shot.”

        Uh, no. Did you read what I posted? The killings spread over a month’s time, from November to December of 1941, with the most intense action stretching from December 9th-15th.

        “Paget received many letters denying this happened and was able to call several witnesses who had been billeted with Jewish families and who reported a fully functioning synagogue and of the Jewish market still carrying out commerce right up to the time Manstein left Crimea.”

        Yes, I already explained why and I’m not going to do it again. Short version for short bus:
        The Jews left over were Turks who practiced Judaism but were not considered “racially Jewish.” This is why they were spared.

        “It became apparent during the trial that Jews in SIMEROPOL were unaware of any special danger. Ohlendorf had reported not just SIMFEROPOL clear of Jews but also the whole of Crimea, which shows him to be a man prepared to claim anything his bosses wanted,Pages 168-174 of MANSTEIN His campaign and his trial.”

        Look, I get what Paget did. He fought for his client and did a better job than the prosecutor.
        But to make the blanket statement that ALL Einsatzgruppen reports were exaggerated based on a single trial and some brief research from the defense attorney does not prove that point. Also, subsequent research shows the reality of what actually happened in Simeropol in November and December of 1941. You copying from some crappy “denier researcher” doesn’t change that.

        “You later asked “where did they go” Well, according to the ‘Jewish Telegraph Agency’ 2 million Jews from the Baltic countries escaped across the Urals into the safety of the Russian interior before the Germans approached.
        This caused a scacity of Jewish labour, Hence: “Deportations of German and Czech Jews into Riga (Latvia) and Minsk (Belarus) have been dealt with in detail by Raul Hilberg, who also emphasizes in his three-volume study the economic importance of Jewish prisoners working in those territories. He writes, for example, of “a widespread demand for Jewish workers,” and that in Riga German and Latvian
        Jews worked for the SS, the army, the navy, the air force, the railroad, and in commercial enterprises.
        A Slovak Jew, Gisi Fleischman, reported in March of 1943 that in the region of Lublin (Poland), he encountered other Slovak Jews, as well as Belgian Jews.
        In 1942 Jews from Belgium, Netherlands and France arrived by train in Lvov (Lviv), Ukraine, according to testimony of the eyewitness I. Hertz provided in 1946 by the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee of the USSR.

        The French Communist underground newspaper Notre Voix reported in its April 1944 issue:
        ‘News that will please all the Jews of France was broadcast by Radio Moscow. Who among us has not had a brother, a sister, a spouse or a parent among those deported from Paris? And who will not rejoice when he hears that 8,000 Paris Jews have been rescued by the glorious Red Army! One of them reported on Radio Moscow how he was saved from death together with 8,000 other Paris Jews. They all found themselves in Ukraine at the time of the latest Soviet offensive, and the SS bandits wanted to shoot them before they left the country’. Jews were actually found all over eastern Europe after the war.”

        It doesn’t account for the missing Jews, nearly 5.5 million of them.

        “I could continue but think this is not the forum for overly long explanations. In short what you have posted is long debunked claims and documents of doubtful authenticity.”

        In short you’ve shown me your lack of knowledge on the subject.

        How about this:
        http://www.skepticforum.com/viewforum.php?f=39

        That is a forum I belong to. Now, Jim is going to whine but don’t mind him.

        You believe that this comments section is not the forum for long explanations. I agree. Go to Skeptics, register and login. There are a lot of topics in Holocaust Denial.

        Couple of things to keep in mind:
        No cutting and pasting of long tracks of copyrighted material. That’s what got Jim in trouble. Short tracks, links and then explanations will keep you from having problems.
        That’s my challenge to you, “Mick.”

        As for the rest of what you said, I’ll be back later to address it. I’m a working man, after all.

        As for the

        Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 29, 2016 @ 7:35 am

    • Shlomo. On your Sobibor link, consider: ‘SOBIBOR A TRANSIT CAMP’…….
      Nuremberg document NO-482 referred to by Senior Historian of the USHMM we find that the crucial part of Himmler’s 5 July 1943 directive reads as follows: “Das Durchgangslager Sobibor im Distrikt Lublin ist in ein Konzentrationslager umzuwandeln. In dem Konzentrationslager ist eine Entlaborierungsanstalt für Beutemunition einzurichten.
      Translation:
      “ The Sobibór TRANSIT camp, located in the Lublin district, is to be converted into a concentration camp. A dismantling unit for captured enemy munitions is to be set up in the concentration camp.” And in Pohl’s reply from 15 July 1943 (not 10 July as stated by Black) we read: “Gemäß Ihrer obigen Anordnung soll das Durchgangslager Sobibór im Distrikt Lublin in ein Konzentrationslager umgewandelt zu werden. Ich habe mich mit SS-Gruppenführer Globocnik darüber unterhalten. Wir beide schlagen Ihnen vor, die Umwandlung in ein Konzentrationslager aufzugeben, weil der von Ihnen erstrebte Zweck, nämlich: in Sobibór eine Entlaborierungsanstalt für Beutemunition einzurichten, auch ohne diese Umwandlung erreicht wird.
      Translation: “ According to your above instructions, the Sobibór TRANSIT camp in the Lublin district is to be converted into a concentration camp. I have discussed this with SS-Gruppenführer Globocnik. Both of us propose to abandon this conversion, as the purpose intended, viz. to set up at Sobibór an installation for the defusing of enemy munitions, can be realized without such a conversion.” Then on 24 July 1943 Himmler’s personal assistant, Rudolf Brandt, replied back:
      “Der Reichsführer-SS ist mit dem Vorschlag, den Sie und SS-Gruppenführer Globocnik hinsichtlich der Belassung des Durchgangslager Sobibór im Distrikt Lublin in dem augenblicklichen Zustand gemacht haben, einverstanden, nachdem der vom ihm gewünschte Zweck auf diese Weise erreicht wird.
      Translation:
      “ The Reichsführer SS agrees to the proposal [made] by you and SS-Gruppenführer Globocnik concerning the maintenance of the Sobibor TRANSIT camp in the Lublin district in its present state, as the desired objective can be attained in this manner.” 

      Comment by mick — December 29, 2016 @ 4:42 am

      • I have written several blog posts about Sobibor:
        https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/tag/sobibor/

        I have a whole section on my website about Sobibor:
        https://scrapbookpages.com/Poland/Sobibor/index.html

        Comment by furtherglory — December 29, 2016 @ 7:14 am

        • ‘Dachau: 1933-45, The Official History’ by Paul Berben. “written on behalf and under the auspices of the Comité International de Dachau.” “published for sale only at the Dachau Camp Memorial Site.

          ” Tells us: “the Dachau gas-chamber was never used.” (p. 8)
          Also: The hospital care given to prisoners is praised continually in Berben’s official history.

          “The accommodation was complete and modern, and in normal conditions specialists could have treated all the diseases efficiently. Operations were performed in two well-equipped theatres. The laboratory was well appointed, and all the necessary analyses could be made there until, at the end of 1944, when the service was overwhelmed. There was an electrocardiograph and the very latest model of a Siemens X-ray apparatus”. (p. 104).
          The author states that the increase in hospital service was beneficial to the prisoners.
          “The effect of these changes on the prisoners situation was beneficial. Generally speaking, there was good understanding between the doctors and prisoner-nurses, and their co-operation achieved good results. Thanks to the doctors’ initiative, backed up by the nurses and with the help of workmen, a special hut was built between Blocks 11 and 13 for the tuberculosis patients to take open-air cures. Sputum was examined in the laboratory and most of those prisoners in whom it was found to give a positive reaction were hospitalized and treated by rest and fresh-air cures and given extra rations”. (p. 106)

          On Sundays a certain amount of freedom was allowed for amusements.”
          “Theatrical entertainments, concerts, revues and lectures were arranged too. Among the thousands of men who lived in the camp there were all sorts of talents, great and small, to be found: famous musicians, good amateur musicians, theatre and music-hall artists. Many of these men devoted their time in the most admirable way to gain a few moments of escape for their comrades in misery, and to keep up their morale. And these activities helped too to create a feeling of fellowship. During the last months there were also a few film shows, about once a fortnight”. (page 72) “In addition to these forms of entertainment, “The camp had a library which started in a modest way but which eventually stocked some fifteen thousand volume… There was a very varied choice, from popular novels to the great classics, and scientific and philosophical works.” (p. 72)

          Berben also notes that “some men in spite of their miserable convicts’ existence nevertheless found the energy to take an interest in the arts, in science and in philosophical problems.” (p. 73) And if the library was insufficient to meet the reading needs of the prisoner, UA prisoner could subscribe to newspapers and various publications … ” (p. 75) Newspaper subscriptions were allowed right up until the very end of the war”. (p. 180)
          All in all Berben’s Dachau, 1933-1945: The Official History is fascinating. The book tells us that the prisoners had a brothel, a canteen, Sundays off, church services, plays, lectures, a library, newspapers, concerts, and movies. It tells us that they were given regular meals, some even receiving a second breakfast, that food came in from the Red Cross, that food parcels were sent in by relatives and that prisoners could purchase food at the canteen. It tells us they had a modern hospital with doctors and nurses who made every effort to help the prisoners, until they were finally overwhelmed by disease near the end of the war. It tells us that disease was the primary cause of death at Dachau, and that even the American liberators lost thousands of prisoners to disease. While speaking of “the tens of thousand of deportees who were exterminated in the death camp,” Dachau: The Official History establishes that no such extermination took place. In the face of continuing propaganda efforts to represent Dachau and other German concentration camps to the public at large as centers of annihilation,

          Berben’s official history if anything gives authoritative support to the revisionist position AND THIS IS THE ‘OFFICIAL HISTORY’……..

          Comment by mick — December 29, 2016 @ 7:29 am

      • Sobibor is one of the few camps that I have never visited. I was advised not to go there. The camp is located out in the boon docks and there was no memorial site there, back when I was traveling to all the former camps. I was told that there were robbers waiting to rob tourists there.

        Comment by furtherglory — December 29, 2016 @ 7:23 am

    • Shlomo. ON YOUR ‘FAKE SHOWER HEADS’. “The fourteen shower heads mentioned in the June 24, 1943 transfer documents for crematorium III were genuine. To support the argument that the fourteen shower heads in the transfer documents were fake, it would be necessary to conclude that real showers were planned, but then a month later were replaced with fake ones. Indeed, the traditional narrative holds that morgue 1 of crematorium II had been used for two months before this report to gas people in a room equipped with fake shower heads. Because crematorium III was supposed to have a comparable function, it would mean that morgue 1 of crematorium III was originally meant to have fake showers, then real ones, and then fake ones again.

      This is not believable. “Undressing rooms” are meant in the ordinary mortuary sense, not in any special sense. Bischoff originally suggested the location of the showers in an undressing room, which means that the room was understood to be an undressing room before the showers were contemplated. This can only mean that the word “undressing room” is being used in an ordinary mortuary sense, that is, as a space where bodies are cleaned and prepared before burial, or in this case, cremation. The implementation of hygienic measures took precedence over any other alleged purposes for the crematorium cellars. The traditional narrative holds that the crematoriums were built to destroy the traces of persons who would be murdered in the cellars with poison gas. But the report leaves no doubt that, for the sake of camp hygiene, this undocumented, allegedly intended purpose of the crematoriums was going to be suspended so that the camp population could take hot showers.

      The crematoriums were going to be used to provide ad hoc hygienic measures, before the completion of the Central Sauna (BW 32, which was opened at the beginning of 1944), and possibly at times of high traffic thereafter. In this case, at minimum, it was intended to use the basement spaces of crematorium III to provide ad hoc showers for the camp population, and it is known that fourteen showers were installed. We note again that Mattogno has cited documents from June 1943 which indicate that the water for the showers was not heated in the manner Bischoff envisioned in this report, and that the plans for installing showers covered both crematoriums II and III. This suggests that the fourteen showers in morgue 1 were not heated, or were heated by other means. Mattogno’s data also suggest that crematorium II may also have been equipped with showers at this time, or even before. The fact that showers were not mentioned on the transfer documents for crematorium II could be explained by the fact that the showers were not originally planned for these structures, but were improvised. In addition, while crematorium III was handed over to the camp authorities in late June, that is, after Bischoff’s report, crematorium II was officially transferred to the camp authorities at the end of March 1943, so any inventory document of that time could simply not include items added afterwards.

      Bischoff’s telegram to Prüfer was overly ambitious and probably deliberately so. The overall thrust of the report is that Bischoff wished to reassure Kammler that, despite the delays in construction, work was proceeding energetically to solve all the issues related to camp hygiene. Our surmise is that showers never could have been installed, but it made an impressive figure to report to Kammler, by way of a copy of the telegram to Prüfer. It also appears that Bischoff seemed to waver on the location: one hundred showers would make most sense in the largest morgue (morgue 2, the “undressing room”). But in the end a smaller number of showers was installed in the smaller morgue. The modest number of showers actually installed could also be explained by the failure to exploit the high volume source of thermal energy that the incinerator would have provided. The dual use of the crematoriums for hygienic purposes may have included the installation of ad hoc disinfestation stations. The apparent plan to temporarily install Topf hot air delousing facilities in crematorium II fits with the fact that showers were actually installed at the same period of time. Facing tremendous hygienic problems, the camp authorities obviously attempted to convert the basements of the crematoriums into a hygiene center with inmate showers and delousing facilities for their clothes.

      In sum, the Bischoff report of May 16, 1943, settles once and for all the question of whether or not the showers in crematorium III were real. It also strongly supports the idea that the crematoriums were equipped with temporary delousing and disinfection facilities in the spring of 1943, which revisionists have argued for years. The revelations in the Bischoff report also clearly contradict the idea that these same basements were used to gas thousands of prisoners or that the crematoriums were built for the purpose of exterminating the camp population”.

      DACHAU: Keep in mind that, with the fake shower heads, this room was also impossible to us as a SHOWER. Therefore, this room served NO PURPOSE: it wasn’t used as a gas chamber, and couldn’t be used as a shower. We are asked to accept that the Nazis kept a large, USELESS room in one of the more important buildings in the Dachau camp (the “gas chamber” is located in the building which houses the Zyklon B clothing fumigation cubicles) and that this room remained UNUSED for years but was never stripped of the fake shower heads which pointed irrefutably to the Nazi’s murderous intentions.
      Surely, understanding the great pains the Nazis took to keep their gassing/extermination plans a secret, and the great pains they supposedly took at OTHER camps to “hide their crimes” once the Allies were advancing (i.e. the destruction of Kremas 2 through 5 at Auschwitz), we can expect that they would have performed the very simple task of removing the fake shower heads (and perhaps plastering over the marks where the shower heads had been). Why didn’t the Nazis do this?

      * There might be a simple answer to the Dachau shower head issue. The height of the ceiling in the “Dachau gas chamber” is presently 7.6 feet. However, in Document L-159, No. 47 of the 79th Congress, 1st Session (Exhibit NO. USA-222; IMT, XXXVII, p. 621), which details the U.S. Army’s investigation of the Dachau camp after liberation, the ceiling of this room is measured at 10 feet high. The fake shower heads which exist today embedded in the 7.6 foot high ceiling are made of sheet metal. Document No. 47 describes the 10 foot high ceiling as having “brass fixtures”, which might very well have been genuine shower heads and pipes but which, in any event, are long absent from the ceiling of this room. Basically, sometime between the liberation of Dachau, and the media blitz regarding the “Dachau gas chamber”, a 10 foot high ceiling with bass fixtures became a 7.6 foot high ceiling with cone-shaped sheet metal fake shower heads. How? I think we can take a guess!

      Comment by mick — December 29, 2016 @ 5:31 am

      • You wrote about the Dachau gas chamber.

        I have written extensively, about the Dachau gas chamber, on my website:
        http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/KZDachau/DachauLife01C.html

        Comment by furtherglory — December 29, 2016 @ 7:02 am

        • DACHAU HOAX CAMP.
          QUOTE: “In 1958, Louis Marschalko published the book ‘The World Conquerors’. He argues that, “upon takeover by the Americans, captive Germans were ordered subsequently to build various additional buildings with the greatest possible speed” (p. 155). They constructed “blood-pits” and a “hanging tree,” and destroyed gardens and flowerbeds that might detract from the ‘death camp’ image. Marschalko adds,
          “The shower-baths, dressing rooms, and reception halls had to be rebuilt so that they should appear like gas-chambers” (p. 156).

          When Dachau fell into Western hands in 1945, it had to look the part, so…it was transformed into a showplace of horrors. … The camp had to have a gas chamber, so, since one did not exist, it was decided to pretend that the shower bath had been one. Previously it had flagstones to a height of about four feet [on the walls]. Similar flagstones were taken [from the adjacent room] and put above those in the shower bath, and a new lower ceiling was created at the top of this second row of flagstones, with iron funnels in it (the [fake] inlets for the gas).” (Combat, Jan/Feb 1961, issue #10, p. 4).

          In June of 1959, Steven Pinter spoke out, publishing the following statement in a letter to a Catholic periodical:

          QUOTE:
          “I was in Dachau for 17 months after the war, as a U.S. War Department Attorney, and can state that there was no gas chamber at Dachau. What was shown to visitors and sightseers there and erroneously described as a gas chamber was a crematory. Nor was there a gas chamber in any of the other concentration camps in Germany.” (Our Sunday Visitor, June 14, p. 15) Former inmate and Catholic bishop Johannes Neuhäusler claimed, in 1960, that no gas chamber had ever been put into use at the camp. Two months later, orthodox German historian Martin Broszat issued a letter confirming that “Neither in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other prisoners gassed.”
          …………………………………………………………………………………………………………
          According to the book ‘Dachau The Official History 1933-1945’ produced and sold at the camp and written by a committee of survivors: There were Hospitals, International Schools for child inmates, A Chapel built for Christians, A library which, by the end of the war contained 15,000 books, A clinic, A brothel, camp newspapers, food parcels…Yad vashem confirms NO gas chambers on German soil!. Slightly different from the usual story, and it’s OFFICIAL!

          Comment by mick — December 29, 2016 @ 7:34 am

    • Shlomo. Hoefle Telegram.
      12. OMX de OMQ 1000 89 ? ?
      State secret! To the Reich Security Main Office, for
      the attention of SS Obersturmbannführer EICHMANN, BERLIN […rest missed…]
      13/15. OLQ de OMQ 1005 83 234 250
      State secret! To the commander of the Security Police,
      for the attention of SS Obersturmbannführer HEIM, KRAKAU.
      Re: 14-day report Operation REINHARD. Reference: radiogram from there.
      Recorded arrivals until 31 December 42, L 12761, B 0, S 515, T 10335 totaling
      23611. Situation [ … ] 31 December 42, L 24733, B 434508, S 101370,
      T 71355, totaling 1274166.
      SS and police leader of Lublin, HOEFLE, Sturmbannführer.
      …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
      Could you point out anywhere in the telegram where it says Killing or gas chambers? In this case, it might be me not having the complete telegram.

      Comment by mick — December 29, 2016 @ 5:56 am

      • You asked about the “Shlomo Hoefle Telegram”

        I wrote about the telegram on this blog post:
        https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/does-the-famous-hoefle-telegram-prove-the-holocaust/

        Comment by furtherglory — December 29, 2016 @ 6:45 am

        • NO!. I asked about the ‘Hoefle Telegram’ which was addressed to Shlomo. As your comment contained the testimony of Samuel Rajzman, Yankel Vernik, Abraham Bomba, Jean Francois Steiner etc. I must admit to switching off in fear that their shite would harm my mental capacity.

          Comment by mick — December 29, 2016 @ 7:11 am

          • You wrote: “I asked about the ‘Hoefle Telegram’ which was addressed to Shlomo.”

            I wrote about the Hoefle telegram on this blog post:

            https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/does-the-famous-hoefle-telegram-prove-the-holocaust/

            Comment by furtherglory — December 29, 2016 @ 7:31 am

            • I don’t wish to be pedantic but you actually posted, in quotations “You asked about the “Shlomo Hoefle Telegram”. I was merely pointing out that there is no such thing !.LOL.

              I wrote about the telegram on this blog post:

              Comment by mick — December 29, 2016 @ 7:41 am

              • You wrote: “I was merely pointing out that there is no such thing [as the Hoefle Telegram].

                Why is there so much information about the Hoefle Telegram if it did not exist?

                Why do people question something, which was in a telegram that did not exist?

                Comment by furtherglory — December 29, 2016 @ 7:54 am

                • Not too sure if you’re having a laugh or that you really are that dim !. I shall put it in childrens language: You asked about the “Shlomo Hoefle Telegram” Please u.n.d,e.r.s.t.a.n.d, there is no such thing as the “Shlomo hoefle Telegram” only the ‘Hoefle Telegram’ which doesn’t mention killing or gassing of Jews. Got it now?. Oy Vey!.

                  Comment by mick — December 29, 2016 @ 8:09 am

                • You wrote: “there is no such thing as the “Shlomo hoefle Telegram” only the ‘Hoefle Telegram’ which doesn’t mention killing or gassing of Jews.”

                  I wrote about the telegram on this blog post:
                  https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/does-the-famous-hoefle-telegram-prove-the-holocaust/

                  Comment by furtherglory — December 29, 2016 @ 8:14 am

          • You wrote: ” I must admit to switching off in fear that their shite would harm my mental capacity.”

            What is “shite”?

            Comment by furtherglory — December 29, 2016 @ 8:46 am

            • British for SHIT !.

              Comment by mick — December 29, 2016 @ 11:22 am

          • Dick(sic) wrote: “I must admit to switching off in fear that their shite would harm my mental capacity.”

            No worries there for you mate – you would need a mental capacity in the first place for it to be harmed

            Also don’t be rude to Furtherglory – it’s her blog so don’t take the piss

            Comment by Anonymouse — December 29, 2016 @ 4:19 pm

            • Lol

              Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 29, 2016 @ 4:31 pm

  2. Shlomo, “Sorry, I was distracted by your stupidity. It happens”. That must be a Kosher clown thing, Honk Honk !… I’m still waiting for this evidence of yours. I promise to be impressed if you can come up with something, anything !.

    Comment by mick — December 28, 2016 @ 12:04 pm

  3. Shlomo, “Sorry, I was distracted by your stupidity. It happens”. That must be a Kosher clown thing, Honk Honk !… I’m still waiting for this evidence of yours. I promise to be impressed if you can come up with something, anything !.

    Comment by mick — December 28, 2016 @ 11:54 am

  4. Hermie…You weren’t wrong. FG misquoted Trump’s comment as did most of the lacquered bimbos they use to deliver the televised propaganda they still call news. While the nation was in a Christmas coma Obama signed this “Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act” into law. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-12-24/obama-signs-countering-disinformation-and-propaganda-act-law We can expect more legislation like this in the future until the nation’s unique First Amendment is rendered meaningless. Wherever Free Speech and Free Historical Inquiry is being chipped away at with new legislation you will find a precision placed Pinocchio dill behind the scenes rubbing his/her hands in sanctimonious glee.

    Comment by who dares wings — December 28, 2016 @ 8:57 am

    • Nice to see you haven’t changed, who dares wings. Still peddling your silly conspiracy theories along with your Jew hatred.
      News flash. YouTube is not the best place to learn anything.

      Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 9:42 am

    • Who dares wings wrote: “Hermie…You weren’t wrong. FG misquoted Trump’s comment ”

      Indeed, I wasn’t. Trump was talking about kissing beautiful women without delay (i.e. without waiting for their explicit consent), not about grabbing them by the pussy, when he said “when you’re a star, they let you do it.”

      WDW wrote: “While the nation was in a Christmas coma Obama signed this “Countering Disinformation And Propaganda Act” into law. ”

      Big liars know the importance of disinformation and bamboozlement. And since the US media and government are the biggest liars ever seen, it’s no surprise that US leaders have taken steps to thwart the alternative narratives exposing their own lies and undoing their meticulous work of deception of the masses.

      Comment by hermie — December 28, 2016 @ 7:19 pm

  5. Money, power and fame are powerful aphrodisiacs for [most] women. And numerous wealthy, powerful and famous men use and abuse their position to get sexual favors from beautiful women. These are just laws of nature. But political correctness hates the laws of nature. Hence the outrage over Donal Trump’s comment exposing [most] women’s venal side. Note he didn’t say that he did grab women by their pussies. He just said that power makes it possible. I understood Trump’s comment as a mere figure of speech to illustrate his point, but maybe I was wrong about that.

    Comment by hermie — December 28, 2016 @ 2:43 am

  6. I followed the Wikileaks releases very closely and don’t recall them ever indicating Russia hacked the DNC emails. Julian Assange, if we can believe he has spoken with Hannity post-election, denied Russian involvement in the DNC hacks. There are other interviews with him leading up to the election where he says the same thing. I don’t know here you got this idea that Wikileaks was saying Russians were involved in the election because they’ve been vehemently denying this all along.

    Hillary Clinton belongs in prison for treason! Yes, you may have had your own server at one time, but you were never a Secretary of State selling political favors to foreign countries and involved in mustering private armies to topple regimes under false pretexts like Libya and Syria in order to personally benefit from the bloodshed.

    Do you know where Clinton Foundation CEO Eric Braverman is? He’s and his husband Neil Brown (who may not be gay and who married him so they could never testify against each other in court ) have been missing since Oct. 12th. Today they found a cache of Sarin gas weapons in Aleppo which were looted from Libya after mercenaries beat Muammar Gaddafi to death and sodomized his corpse on camera. “We came, we saw, we killed him.” Hillary cackled maniacally on national television after the world was treated to this disgusting spectacle.

    You need to get up to speed on why the Trump victory, as crass and boorish as he is, was better for this country than having Hillary in the White House continuing to run her rackets out of it. Watch all 4 parts of this and then watch it again to get a sense of the extent of the Clinton family’s mind boggling corruption. “Day 65 Where is Eric Braverman?” Part 1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UVkkLCrj3w&t=35s .

    Comment by who dares wings — December 28, 2016 @ 2:11 am

  7. Trump didn’t know that he would win. He just said so. And he was right.

    Comment by Jett Rucker — December 27, 2016 @ 2:22 pm

  8. Jeff….All politics is Jew politics so I can sympathize with you.

    JR

    Comment by jrizoli — December 27, 2016 @ 12:50 pm

  9. FG you know I Agree you because you have the right Viewpoint on the HoloHoax but in regards to politics I really don’t agree with you. You make a big deal out of trump being a pussy grabbing type of fellow but you don’t say anything about Hillary Clinton’s husband who has actually done that as a politician many times and then on TV he actually lied about it whereas Trump has only done that in the public sector not a politician if you believe he has done those type of immoral activitie at all.. So I think it’s very disgenerous of you to make it look like Hillary was the best person to vote for here when the Democrats have plenty of sins they are guilty of too.
    I only voted for Trump because I felt he was better than Hillary and her lies but we will see how Trump pans out on anything that he says he’s going to do I don’t have too much hope for him.
    I’m curious though did you vote for Hillary because she was a woman because to me that is not the reason to vote for people because of gender race political Viewpoint or whatever you vote for people because you think they’re the right person to do the job for everyone.

    JR

    Comment by jrizoli — December 27, 2016 @ 11:43 am

  10. I still follow you, though I don’t comment as much.

    I disagree with you on pretty much everything you believe in but I agree that the Trump will be a horrible president and that the damage he will cause will take years, if not decades, to correct.
    You have my sympathies. I did get an e-mail from Wolf and I am still following him on Facebook.

    Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 27, 2016 @ 11:36 am

    • The damage Trump does will no more EVER be repaired than has the damage his predecessors have done. Neither would the damage Hillary would assuredly have done.

      Comment by Jett Rucker — December 27, 2016 @ 2:23 pm

      • His cabinet appointees alone show what an ignorant douchebag he is.
        Not as ignorant as deniers are, but, we’ll see.

        Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 27, 2016 @ 2:31 pm

        • Jeff….Again these are your Jew run people…..Can’t really I say I trust ANY Jew.
          Wasn’t what they did with the HoloHoax LIE bad enough?

          JR

          Comment by jrizoli — December 27, 2016 @ 2:36 pm

          • My Jew run people?

            Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 27, 2016 @ 2:48 pm

  11. HOLOHOAX CIRCUS: Roll up roll up!, The circus of hate is in town again, this carousel of death still brings in the money!. On and on she goes, this holocaust ride..Pull at the heartstrings with ever more grotesque invention, chase down the protests and Ignore the science, why not?.. On and on she goes, round and round… The holocaust myth is here, Come all you believers, pay your money and top up your lies.This circus must go on and on and on …..

    Comment by mick maguire — December 27, 2016 @ 11:26 am

    • I love this! I suppose it’s a riff on some cultural item I can’t quite place.

      Comment by Jett Rucker — December 27, 2016 @ 2:25 pm

      • Really?
        I just see another ignorant denier that knows nothing of history.

        Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 27, 2016 @ 2:32 pm

      • No Jett, It was just a ditty which came to me after my latest research into the holohoax ‘circus’.

        Comment by mick — December 28, 2016 @ 1:49 am

        • “Latest research.”

          😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

          Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 9:43 am

          • LOL. Every circus has it’s clown, I guess you have nominated yourself as this particular ‘Big Top’ Kosher Clown’. What a wanker!.

            Comment by mick — December 28, 2016 @ 9:55 am

            • What a denier dumbass.

              Tell me, what did your research consist of?

              Browsing YouTube?

              Stormfront?

              CODOH?

              😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

              Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 10:04 am

              • HONK HONK !. Who’s a funny boy then!, you really have it all shlomo, big red shoes and huge snozz.. Got any evidence for that holohoax BS ?, One scientific report of a gas chamber anywhere in German occupied territory, or maybe one autopsy citing HCN poisoning as cause of death, or maybe one German document referring to the genocide of European Jewry, or even a German budgetary document referrencing the costs of killing every Jew in Europe. I accept it’s the job of clowns to make us laugh but you abuse the art……

                Comment by mick — December 28, 2016 @ 10:22 am

                • “HONK HONK !. Who’s a funny boy then!, you really have it all shlomo, big red shoes and huge snozz.. Got any evidence for that holohoax BS ?, One scientific report of a gas chamber anywhere in German occupied territory, or maybe one autopsy citing HCN poisoning as cause of death, or maybe one German document referring to the genocide of European Jewry, or even a German budgetary document referrencing the costs of killing every Jew in Europe. I accept it’s the job of clowns to make us laugh but you abuse the art……”

                  See, I missed this comment. Didn’t come in my e-mail.

                  Not that it was my loss, after all, you make Jim look intelligent. That’s saying something.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 11:48 am

              • Must of been the skeptics sites….LOL

                JR

                Comment by jrizoli — December 28, 2016 @ 11:37 am

                • I think you are just upset because they kicked you off for not obeying the rules.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 11:46 am

                • Jeff….LOL….Should there be ANY rules when discussing the Holohoax topic….
                  It’s the only topic that gets all the pee minded people over there who are getting their undies all tangled up in the crack of their ass when the topic comes up.
                  Jeff notice this site……NO Rules! But things seem to work just fine. People tend to deal with things here differently maybe because most of the commentors here are not HoloHuxsters. It seems like the sites that have mostly HoloHuxsters are the ones that end up making a lot of rules. Why is that? Simple…you have to protect your lies from being exposed and stop the truth from getting out.

                  JR

                  Comment by jrizoli — December 28, 2016 @ 11:56 am

                • This is Furtherglory’s blog, Jim. She can do what she wants.
                  Forums are different. If you can’t follow the rules you get banned.
                  You weren’t banned for content, Jim. Pyrro said himself he wasn’t going to enact specific rules to bar you to the HD sub forum or ban your content. He told you to stop copying and pasting large tracts of copyrighted material, you refused to do so, that’s what got you banned.
                  Stop being such a martyr, Jim. Accept that you did that to yourself and get over it.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 12:08 pm

                • You wrote: “This is Furtherglory’s blog, Jim. She can do what she wants.
                  Forums are different. If you can’t follow the rules you get banned.”

                  Thank you for pointing out that I have a blog, not a discussion forum.
                  Readers of my blog can say anything they want in a comment on my blog.

                  Comment by furtherglory — December 28, 2016 @ 12:20 pm

            • Ooohhhh, let me guess. Holocaust Handbooks?

              I’ve read some of those. Because they were free which is their approximate value.
              I’ll print one out the next time my son needs paper to line his birdcage.

              Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 10:11 am

              • LMFAO !. No evidence then. Now why doesn’t that surprise me ?. Even the late ‘Great’ Raul Hilberg couldn’t supply any when asked. Guess we’ll have to rely on survivor BS that doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. Oy Vey !.

                Comment by mick — December 28, 2016 @ 10:34 am

                • You didn’t ask for evidence, “Mick.”

                  Why do deniers grind on about authors like Hilberg and Arad? You do realize that other books have come out about the subject, right?

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 10:51 am

                • Shlomo, you really must read my comments properly : . “Got any evidence for that holohoax BS ?,” I think that registers as a request for evidence, honk!. Other books you say, yes, I’m aware of them and have many, but not one has given evidence that the holohoax is anything other than a hoax.

                  Comment by mick — December 28, 2016 @ 11:33 am

                • “Shlomo,”

                  What an odd thing to say.

                  “you really must read my comments properly : . “Got any evidence for that holohoax BS ?,” I think that registers as a request for evidence, honk!”

                  Sorry, I was distracted by your stupidity. It happens.

                  Now, is this going to be one of those things where I show you evidence that you won’t believe, thereby wasting my time and showing how dense you are? Because I really don’t want to waste my time.
                  I say all of that with all due respect.

                  “Other books you say, yes, I’m aware of them and have many, but not one has given evidence that the holohoax is anything other than a hoax.”

                  Do you have reading comprehension problems?

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 11:45 am

                • I love being the fly on the wall….it was said by Jeff…..
                  “Now, is this going to be one of those things where I show you evidence that you won’t believe, thereby wasting my time and showing how dense you are? Because I really don’t want to waste my time.
                  I say all of that with all due respect.”

                  You mean what happens when we Revisionist post at the Skeptics site.

                  JR

                  Comment by jrizoli — December 28, 2016 @ 11:48 am

                • “You mean what happens when we Revisionist post at the Skeptics site.”

                  Look, it’s not my fault you can’t follow a few simple rules.

                  Really, Jim, you were out of your league there.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 12:05 pm

                • You wrote: “You mean what happens when we Revisionist post at the Skeptics site.”

                  Could you provide a link to the “Skeptics site”?

                  I won’t be writing anything there — because I will probably disagree with everything that is written there.

                  Comment by furtherglory — December 28, 2016 @ 12:10 pm

                • Shlomo, “Sorry, I was distracted by your stupidity. It happens”. That must be a Kosher clown thing, Honk Honk !… I’m still waiting for this evidence of yours. I promise to be impressed if you can come up with something, anything !.

                  Comment by mick — December 28, 2016 @ 12:16 pm

                • “Shlomo, “

                  I still think that’s odd.

                  “Sorry, I was distracted by your stupidity. It happens”. That must be a Kosher clown thing,”

                  Kosher?

                  “Honk Honk !… I’m still waiting for this evidence of yours. I promise to be impressed if you can come up with something, anything !.”

                  Somehow I doubt your sincerity.

                  But, OK.

                  This is a link for forensic tests done after the war on materials found at Krema II. Scroll down to read the English version of this report:

                  http://holocaustcontroversies.yuku.com/topic/1894

                  This is a copy of a report detailing the shooting of Jews in the USSR:

                  English:
                  https://www.historiography-project.com/nca/nca06/3428-PS.php

                  German:
                  http://www.ns-archiv.de/imt/ps3401-ps3600/3428-ps.php

                  Gas vans, English and German:

                  https://web.archive.org/web/20150325081826/http://holocaust-history.org/19420605-rauff-spezialwagen/

                  http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/contemporary-german-documents-on.html?m=1

                  “Gassing cellar”

                  https://web.archive.org/web/20150323222744/http://www.holocaust-history.org/auschwitz/19430129-vergasungskeller/

                  That’s all I’ve got time for, I’m back to work.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — December 28, 2016 @ 12:34 pm

                • Yes just as I thought. Firstly, the Jan Sehn Institute reports have been thoroughly debunked by Germar Rudof who issued a challenge to their science, which they refused to defend. 2nd link: “Combating of Partisans and action against Jews in the District General of White Ruthenia” This is concerning Einsatzgruppen actions against partisans, mostly Jewish. At the Erich Von Manstein trial, Defence lawyer & Historian R T Paget established that the claims made by the Einsatzgruppen were exagerated by a factor of 10: (MANSTEIN. His Campaigns And His Trial).3rd link is in German, I’m English. 4th link GAS VANS, are you serious?. Not one of these fictional vans has ever been found and when the ‘Museam of tolerence’ in America included a photo of one, David Stein/Cole pointed out that it was a furniture van which ran on ‘producer gas’, they immediately removed the exhibit.
                  As for The infamous “Vergasungskeller” “A single letter from SS-Hauptsturmführer BISCHOFF dated January 29, 1943 contains the word “Vergasungskeller” and is to this day the strongest evidence for the mass extermination hoax with cyanide (see Pressac page 211 ). The word has several possible translations, the most literal being a cellar where gas is released, or generated. It has been given the most sinister meaning possible by the exterminationists who insist that it must have been a place where people were gassed to death. But, the word is actually explained by a related letter, also from Bischoff, dated December 18, 1942 (see Pressac page 210 ) in which the very first sentence says: “Im Monat Dezember musste wegen Entlausung und Entwesung die Arbeit an mehreren Tagen ruhen” (“During the month of December work had to be stopped for several days because of delousing and disinfestation”). It is clear enough that the fumigations were occurring somewhere within the building. Or else, why would there have been any need to stop work? The work was actually stopped for days (Pressac actually mistranslated the text) and delayed completion of this urgently needed crematorium. The surrender of five million Soviet prisoners to the Germans by this time would have been a major reason for completing these Kremas as quickly as possible. But obviously, the need for delousing and disinfestation was even greater.” “Why did they not use the correct word ‘Gaskammer’ (Gas Chamber) Apart from its use in these documents, “Vergasungskeller” appears to be a totally non-existent word in German. It has no known technical meaning; it is not listed in any technical dictionary that anyone appears to know of, either on-line or in book form, for example, the Eurodicautom or http://www2.dict.cc (they even have a forum).

                  Comment by mick — December 28, 2016 @ 1:24 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: