Scrapbookpages Blog

January 14, 2017

The Auschwitz main camp as caught on a drone camera

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust, Uncategorized — Tags: , — furtherglory @ 11:07 am

 

You can see what the main camp at Auschwitz looks like today, as caught on a drone camera:

https://www.good.is/articles/drone-footage-of-auschwitz

 

My photo of the gas chamber in the main Auschwitz camp

My photo of the gas chamber in the main Auschwitz camp

I have a section on my scrapbookpages.com website where you can see more of my photos of the Auschwitz I camp: https://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/Tour/Auschwitz1/index.html

 

14 Comments »

  1. Despite my heavy sobs, I managed to read these informations:

    “Railway tracks into Auschwitz-Birkenau”

    “Ruins of wooden huts at Birkenau”

    “Entrance to Auschwitz I”

    “Auschwitz I”

    “Courtyard between blocks 10 and 11 at Auschwitz I”

    Why isn’t there a single mention of the buildings for which Auschwitz got its fame?

    During the very long sequence (1:37 – 2:07) panning over the 12 ominous chimneys, why are the millons Jews who were thrown alive in the ovens not mentioned?

    Why weren’t added computer-generated bursting flames reaching to the skies?

    Comment by a reader — January 17, 2017 @ 9:21 pm

  2. FG….You have the best pics out there I have used them in my many videos…much appreciated.

    JR

    Comment by Jim Rizoli — January 14, 2017 @ 2:48 pm

    • You wrote: “You have the best pics out there”

      When I took many of these photos, there were signs everywhere saying that taking photos was not allowed. I was holding my camera in one hand, and I kept hitting the button to take a photo. The people who were guarding the remains of the camps kept telling me that photos were not allowed, but I kept pretending that I didn’t understand.

      Comment by furtherglory — January 15, 2017 @ 6:57 am

  3. If you took away the solemn, spine-tingling, funereal music that’s playing loudly in the background of the above video, and replaced it with the theme tune for the TV series “Soap”, then all the pretensions of Auschwitz being a place of horror would soon melt away.

    The BBC claims that it produced the video – but in describing it, I can only echo the words of President-Elect Donald Trump when he described BBC News as “another beauty”.

    Comment by Talbot — January 14, 2017 @ 1:37 pm

    • The BBC is one of the worst cheer-leaders for this ridiculous holohoax. Today (Sunday 15th Jan.), they even managed to talk about the ‘Denial’ Movie on its flagship weekly political show – and even invited Timothy Spall into the studio for an interview.

      Timothy Spall, of course, played the part of David Irving; and the interviewer kept talking about “villains” and “heroes”, and making it quite clear who the villain was by showing clips of Spall acting out Irving’s role in the Movie. By contrast, the hero was the attractive actress who played the part of Deborah Lippstadt.

      But the BBC was careful not to show any photos of the real David Irving and Deborah Lippstadt in case the viewers might get a bit of shock when they realised that “the villain” was in fact quite a handsome and personable type of character, whereas the hero looked like an ugly troll who the dog had dragged in from the woods.

      But in addition to hammering home to the viewers whom they should accept as heroes and villains, the show was also pure holohoax propaganda, as well as a free advertising plug for the ‘Denial’ Movie when its opens in British theatres on 27th January.

      Yes, folks – 27th January – that most holy and sacred day of the entire year, when each and every one of us pays homage to the 6 million Jews who went to work in German labour camps during WW2, and then found out afterwards that there was not only generous lifetime compensation payments for them all, but lucrative careers in the booming “holocaust industry”.

      Comment by Talbot — January 15, 2017 @ 9:29 am

      • http://jan27.org/

        JR

        Comment by Jim Rizoli — January 15, 2017 @ 9:47 am

        • Reading the http://jan27.org/ website it becomes clear that Revisionist scholars in France were questioning the official Jewish wartime narrative and the Nuremburg judgements twenty years or more before the term “holocaust” was introduced and became a global buzz-word.

          For instance; Maurice Bardeche wrote a book as early as 1948 questioning these events – but his work was seized by the French authorities, the book banned, and he was sentenced to a year imprisonment.

          Paul Rassinier wrote two books in 1949 and 1950, but was denounced in the French National Assembly, sent to trial, and expelled from political life.

          Then later, In 1966, Roger Garaudy was fined a severe $50,000 dollar penalty for publishing a book entitled “The Founding Myths of Modern Israel.

          In more recent years we have had Robert Faurrison and Vincent Reynouard who have continued to shine the torch of truth from inside France – even though that nation has strict ( and totally absurd ) “holocaust denial and hate” laws in place. But in addition to these restrictions, Revisionists inside France are handicapped to a large extent by the fact that the country was occupied by the Germans during WW2, and French Jews came under the restrictive Nuremburg Laws, and a fraction of them were deported to Germany and Poland for forced labour. When this is combined to the constant and everlasting holo-propaganda that the French general public ( like all the rest of us! ) are bombarded with, then it is a credit to French Revisionist historians and writers that they are prepared to get the message out to the rest of the world.

          But a special salute must go to Francois Duprat, who in the late-1960’s, distributed the French Edition of “Did Six Million Really Die”. He was murdered in a car bomb attack, which left his wife crippled. The attack was claimed by the “Jewish Remembrance Commando”.

          Now, I don’t know what you think ladies and gentlemen, but I do wish that Barry – The Treblinka camp commandant’s faithful old St Bernard dog – had still been around in the 1960’s, in order to attack the testicles, and tear-off great chunks of flesh from the buttocks of the members of the “Jewish Remembrance Commando” who carried out this despicable deed.

          Comment by Talbot — January 15, 2017 @ 12:22 pm

          • The only good news is the Jews aren’t so radical in their approach to Revisionist today.
            Now they ignore, slander and defame us so as to not permit us to have a hearing before the public about the topic.
            Debates are definitely out of the question..Who would be able to debate us? They have nothjing to show to back themselves up except what ifs, and we think, and it might of been so, but NO definite proof that the killings happened the way they contradictory say they did Lots of talk but no action.

            This is why when I deal with Holohuxsters they would have to explain to me why they in the past, especially the
            (Radical HoloHuxsters) have acted so badly in dealing with Revisionist in the past. Is it really worth attacking and physically harming them because they don’t agree with their HoloHoax tales? Seems a bit harsh to me.
            Do you know of any topic that people have reacted so strongly about to actually physically harm people?
            Can a Holohuxsters here answer me why they become so rabid when the topic comes up?
            Are you really that insecure to use truthful facts to prove your points not brawn. I get it….you have no facts.

            JR

            Comment by Jim Rizoli — January 15, 2017 @ 1:41 pm

  4. Time to expose the Holohoax
    https://theendofzion.com/2017/01/14/introduction-to-the-holohoax/

    JR

    Comment by Jim Rizoli — January 14, 2017 @ 12:40 pm

  5. First of all, there were no gas chambers. Forced to sing anyway? Maybe to work …. “Hi ho, hi ho, it’s off to work we go …” Oh yeah, work was a 4-letter word to them.

    Comment by Diane King — January 14, 2017 @ 12:39 pm

    • Attorney General: Now, when you went to work in the morning and came back in the evening, you say you had to sing?

      Witness Wells: We had to make up songs and sing while we were going to work, and also the Brandmeister would march in front, he was clothed like a devil; he had a special uniform with the hook in his hand and we had to march after him and sing. Afterwards we were also joined by an orchestra which would play as we sang and accompany us on our march to work.

      This little gem comes from the Eichmann trial in (guess where!) – Jerusalem. Leon Wells was described in court as a Doctor – but I can’t help thinking that he was a rather desperately ill, or at least deluded patient, rather than a doctor.

      Comment by Talbot — January 14, 2017 @ 2:01 pm

  6. Watched both the long version 6 min, and the short one…..
    You will notice they don’t show Krema 1 or I didn’t see it anyway…
    To show Krema 1 would cause some questions because it wasn’t used as a homicidal gas chamber and it was pretty much recreated after the war and made to look like people were killed there by removing the walls and utilities in the building.
    How would they explain the big chimney added on to the building with no connection to the main building?
    How about the 4 holes in the roof that were chipped in later or was it 6, 3, or 1 as some “eyewitnesses said.
    Which is it….is that the best they could come up with several different versions of the holes in the roof?
    The pictures of the rows and rows of buildings were in Birkenau approx 300 of these rather large buildings to house people which shows that there were thousands of people housed there so the question is why? Why so many buildings if the main plan was to kill all the Jews….and they say most of the 75% of people were sent to their deaths right off the trains. If that was the case….
    Why did they have a full functioning hospital, huge kitchens, libraries, post office, commissary, soccer field, if Auschwitz was just a killing camp? Seems like they did their best to keep people alive, or at least entertained.

    How about the killing wall in block 10-11 not sure which, which was pretty close to the main street outside the camp I saw a truck going by ….they say 20,000 people were killed at that wall (not the original wall by the way) this concrete block wall was added later because the red brick wall originally behind it would of been destroyed by bullets if 20,000 people were killed in front of it. Concrete block more believable to stop bullets but not chip proof. Bullets usually go through people yet we see NO bullet holes in the wall, and if there were some wouldn’t you see thousands of holes somewhere.
    Auschwitz was an enormous work camp divided into three camps, Auschwitz 1, Birkenau, and Moniwitz which is where up to ten thousand people worked in the huge artificial buna rubber factory there designed to make gasoline out of coal which was plentiful in the area.

    So long story short…..would it make sense for the Germans to kill their labor force which was much needed to supply people to work in these camps.
    I say no, the Holohuxsters say yes…..Then try to coordinate the millions of people they say were killed there (4 million) later changed to 1 million, in the short amount of time they say it all happened ( 24 months or so ) without ANY trace of the bodies being found anywhere…..
    Are people that dumb to believe this nonsense…..some are, just go to the Skeptics sites and chat with people there that believe it all happened without ANY trace….yup….thats what they believe…..6 million Jews were killed in fake homicidal gas chambers using all sorts of creative devices, ……one Krema 1 with an industrial bug spray….. makes sense to me…LOL NOT!

    JR

    Comment by Jim Rizoli — January 14, 2017 @ 12:27 pm

    • Again if the original intent had been extermination, it would have been accomplished, we wouldn’t be having this discussion, and there be no issue at all. The Germans were extremely competent and efficient and again had that been their intent, they would have done it.

      Comment by Diane King — January 14, 2017 @ 12:41 pm

    • You wrote: “How would they explain the big chimney added on to the building with no connection to the main building?”

      I have a photo of the chimney, which is not attached to the building, on this page of my website:
      https://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/Tour/Auschwitz1/Auschwitz08A.html

      Comment by furtherglory — January 14, 2017 @ 2:03 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: