Scrapbookpages Blog

January 31, 2017

All you want to know about fake Holocaust photos…

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust, World War II — Tags: , , — furtherglory @ 4:51 pm

The title of my blog post today is similar to the headline on a news article which you can read here: All you want to know about Holocaust

The first photo below is shown in the recent news article:

photo used in news article

photo that was used in news article

same photo cropped differently

same location with a different photo cropped differently

Both of these two different photos show prisoners at the Nordhausen camp, who were killed by American bombs during World War II. Note the fence posts on the right hand side of both photos, which are the same kind of fence posts.

I wrote about this on this previous blog post:

The moral of this story is this: Don’t believe anything that you read in news stories about Jews, and don’t believe half of what you see on the Internet about Jews.


  1. Atrocity propaganda finally making sense of the most destructive war ever fought, in the United States. No small motive to lie and deceive.

    .With U.S. soldiers as the very first victims of their leaders’ bamboozlement…

    “People complain that American soldiers don’t know what they’re fighting for. Here [at Nordhausen] they can at least find out what they’re fighting against.” General Dwight Eisenhower about the staged Holo-circus in Nordhausen, April 1945.

    Comment by hermie — February 6, 2017 @ 6:54 am

  2. I can’t get into Winston Smith’s Ministry of Truth anymore. “The Black Rabbit of Islay” the webmaster at WSMT apparently came out as a Holocaust believer last October at The Skeptic’s Society Forum and the CODOH forum. viewtopic.php?f=39&t=27426# p540012 viewtopic.php?t=10723

    Before I learned he’d gone over to the otherside I’d sent him a personal email asking to be made a member of WSMT so I could resume visiting it. He didn’t respond. He was very good at finding, scanning and posting old news and documents which were transparent Holocaust propaganda. He also visited many of the German camps and posted his tourist photos of those.

    Nobody has ever seen the legendary Krege Report (Ground Penetration Radar) and revisionists have yet to answer David Coles’ question about the ACR Aktion Reinhard Camps in Poland “Where did they go?” in a scholarly enough fashion. We have instructive videos from “denierbud” (where to view these now I can’t say) and Eric Hunt, but unless someone can prove on paper that Jews delivered to the ARC were transited out and ended up in Soviet territory, died of typhus somewhere else, or survived the war revisionism will be losing more ground with the defection of researchers like BRoI and Christian Lindtner, the Danish Sanskrit scholar who helped organized the 2006 Tehran Holocaust Conference and has since changed his mind.

    Comment by who dares wings — February 1, 2017 @ 8:23 am

    • If academics and researchers such as Christian Lindtner and “The Black Rabbit of Islay” are now convinced that there was a holocaust – then it is incumbent upon them to prove by practical tests and technical reports that the principal methods of gassing huge numbers of people actually worked in reality, and were viable for systematic mass extermination.

      The holocaust proponents have never done this, or even attempted to carry out such experiments and physical re-enactments of the killing process. They have relied entirely on eye witness testimony and the statements of the alleged perpetrators. But both these sources of evidence have been shown over the years to be seriously lacking in credibility. For an alleged crime of this magnitude, then the world needs to be provided with complete and verifiable proof that the weapons of mass murder were indeed plausible methods of achieving this enormous undertaking.

      But in addition to this, the holocaust proponents also have to explain how hundreds of thousands of corpses can be disposed of, and leave no traces behind. It comes as quite a shock to learn that there has never been any search at all for the alleged human remains at Auschwitz – and thus no official report exists that can verify that the corpses of 1.1 million human beings were disposed of in the camp. And when this is combined with the claim that that those selected for the gas chambers were not even registered upon arrival – then there is no real, tangible evidence that such a huge number of people were actually put to death there.

      Even at Treblinka, Belzec and Sobibor, the search for human remains over the decades have been shown to be half-baked affairs, that have produced desultory results. ( And at Treblinka, no one is even allowed to undertake a proper archaeological survey of the site! ).

      David Cole’s question of “Where did they go” is a legitimate one, but which can only be answered satisfactorily by the Russian Government. The 64,000 dollar question to them is “Are they in possession of any Soviet or German documentation, or evidence, that has been withheld from the world since the end of WW2 “.

      Comment by Talbot — February 1, 2017 @ 11:21 am

      • Supposedly there have been volumes of information that the Soviets captured but they have only let out a few of the volumes why is that? I believe the reason is because they will see that the rest of these volumes will not prove there was a Holocost just the opposite. If the Soviets had a Smoking Gun they would surely bring it out and show people obviously they don’t and that’s why they haven’t released all the information that’s in their Possession.


        Comment by Jim Rizoli — February 1, 2017 @ 12:10 pm

    • wdw writes;- “Nobody has ever seen the legendary Krege Report” (Ground Penetration Radar).”

      True – but the following info. comes from the David Irving Website back in 2000;-

      “Krege’s team used an $80,000 Ground Penetration Radar (GPR) device, which sends out vertical radar signals that are visible on a computer monitor. GPR detects any large-scale disturbances in the soil structure to a normal effective depth of four or five meters, and sometimes up to ten meters. (GPR devices are routinely used around the world by geologists, archeologists, and police.) In its Treblinka investigation, Krege’s team also carried out visual soil inspections, and used an auger to take numerous soil core samples.

      The team carefully examined the entire Treblinka II site, especially the alleged “mass graves” portion, and carried out control examinations of the surrounding area. They found no soil disturbance consistent with the burial of hundreds of thousands of bodies, or even evidence that the ground had ever been disturbed. In addition, Krege and his team found no evidence of individual graves, bone remains, human ashes, or wood ashes.

      “From these scans we could clearly identify the largely undisturbed horizontal stratigraphic layering, better known as horizons, of the soil under the camp site,” says the 30-year old Krege, who lives in Canberra. “We know from scans of grave sites, and other sites with known soil disturbances, such as quarries, when this natural layering is massively disrupted or missing altogether.” Because normal geological processes are very slow acting, disruption of the soil structure would have been detectable even after 60 years, Krege noted.

      While his initial investigation suggests that there were never any mass graves at the Treblinka camp site, Krege believes that further work is still called for.

      “Historians say that the bodies were exhumed and cremated towards the end of the Treblinka camp’s use in 1943, but we found no indication that any mass graves ever existed,” he says. “Personally, I don’t think there was an extermination camp there at all.”

      Krege is preparing a detailed report on his Treblinka investigation. He says that he would welcome the formation, possibly under United Nations auspices, of an international team of neutral, qualified specialists, to carry out similar investigations at the sites of all the wartime German camps.

      Krege and his team are associated with, and funded by, the Adelaide Institute, a south Australia revisionist “think tank.” Its director, Dr. Fredrick Toben, was jailed in Germany for seven months in 1999 for disputing Holocaust extermination claims.”


      It sounds, therefore, that Richard Krege was initially going to prepare a report for publication, but maybe he got “cold feet” ( and I don’t blame him ) when he started to realise the full repercussions of what could affect him personally if he did put such a report out for publication. The Zionist rottweiler’s are always on the prowl, to attack and destroy the livelihoods of those who recklessly stick their heads too far above the parapet ( witness poor Fred Leuchter and Germar Rudolf ).

      And I expect he was well aware of the problems that his own director – Frederik Toben – has found himself in over the years – including a 7 month prison sentence in Germany!

      In the circumstances, for a young man who still had a good career ahead of him, caution was the better part of valour. But to his credit, he also made clear “that further work is still called for” and asked “for an international team of neutral, qualified specialists to carry out similar investigations”

      But as things stand today, we can only await the publication of the report that Caroline Sturdy Colls has promised to prepare and publish.

      Comment by Talbot — February 1, 2017 @ 3:01 pm

      • Like it really makes a difference if he had a report or didn’t have a report. He stated his facts, it’s obviously he had problems with the Jews coming after him and he didn’t want to get involved knowing that it could harm him in some way. But I do find it interesting that they would make such a big deal over this the facts were made he said what he had to say get over it, but now they want to push this yet they don’t push they’re nonsense that they have no facts for but they want us to believe them at least what Krege had to say made sense by what we see there today.


        Comment by Jim Rizoli — February 1, 2017 @ 3:08 pm

  3. As we are in Holohoax bamboozlement through photos, I propose an interesting experiment. Go to the 2nd photo in furtherglory’s article above. Zoom on the naked corpse in the foreground. Look at this corpse for a while. Isn’t this dead man familiar to you? It is? No surprise. This specific part of the Nordhausen scene is often used by the Holocaust industry to illustrate the ‘Holocaust.’ This specific instance is a microcosm of the Holohoax and its methods. The only naked and emaciated guy in the photo (who had probably died of typhus and was waiting for cremation when U.S. bombs destroyed the camp) was turned into graphic evidence for the ‘Holocaust.’ Beyond the fact that this specific corpse was not even representative of the situation in the Nordhausen camp (look at the other corpses lying around him), it was of course even less evidence for the use of large homicidal gas chambers in Eastern camps, but it has been used for decades (and is still used today) for this specific purpose nevertheless. Very telling and illustrative of the methods used by Holohoaxsters to dupe people into believing in their stories of a huge slaughter of Jews during WW2. Now look at the genitals of this guy. You can see that he was not even circumcized. Thus a photo of a Gentile man who had died of typhus in a labor camp in 1945 is used to ‘prove’ that the Nazis gassed millions of Jews to death at other locations from 1942 to 1944 !! Hard to be more dishonest and misleading than that, isn’t it !? But the Holocaust industry always do that anyway…

    Comment by hermie — February 1, 2017 @ 5:51 am

    • You wrote: “Go to the 2nd photo in furtherglory’s article above. Zoom on the naked corpse in the foreground.”

      The naked corpse has been ADDED to the second photo. Both photos show the same LOCATION.

      Comment by furtherglory — February 1, 2017 @ 6:43 am

      • Are you sure of that, FG? From what I can see, it’s almost impossible to say if there is a naked corpse in the 1st pic or if there is none. Isn’t the 2nd pic an enlargement of the area in the upper right of the 1st pic? Perhaps the naked corpse was brought in that area after the 1st pic was taken and before the 2nd pic was taken.

        Comment by hermie — February 1, 2017 @ 7:38 am

  4. For info, early Allied atrocity propaganda used to claim hilariously that the inmates just killed by US bombs in Nordhausen had been “freed but [were] so weak they lie[d] in row to die.”

    I think one could say that these prisoners had indeed been freed…since they had been killed by “liberty bombs” after all. 😉

    Comment by hermie — January 31, 2017 @ 9:04 pm

  5. I don’t think that its the same photo, because the cameraman is at a higher level in the top photo, but he is standing on the ground in the latter shot.

    And the bodies are laid out differently in the two photos, with a cleared walkway for the soldiers alongside the fence in the upper one – whereas this area is filled up with corpses in the lower photo, while a narrower walkway lies closer to the bombed-out buildings.

    It might well be the same fence in both photos – but curiously, the area beyond the fence seems to be more clear of damage and rubble in the lower photo. While in the upper one it appears to show more extensive mounds of debris.

    I suspect these photos might have been shot on a different day, with many of the corpses removed after the first shot (the upper photo), and the remainder moved into position for a later propaganda shoot. The terribly emaciated corpse on the left hand side is so blatant – that its obviously been placed there for a pose, or, its been “cut-n’-pasted in.

    Comment by Talbot — January 31, 2017 @ 6:54 pm

    • You wrote: “I don’t think that its the same photo, because the cameraman is at a higher level in the top photo, but he is standing on the ground in the latter shot.”

      Both photos are not the SAME photo, but both photos were taken at the SAME LOCATION. One of the photos has a naked corpse that has been added to the photo.

      Comment by furtherglory — February 1, 2017 @ 6:47 am

      • FG wrote: “One of the photos has a naked corpse that has been added to the photo.”

        …or that has been added to that area (atrocity propaganda stage set) in the meantime. Had some U.S. soldiers there found a morgue or a crematoria after the first pic was taken and before the second pic was taken? Sounds plausible.

        Comment by hermie — February 1, 2017 @ 7:57 am

  6. Holocaust narrative not True!


    Comment by Jim Rizoli — January 31, 2017 @ 5:07 pm

  7. I would venture to say that the majority of pictures that are showing today for the Holocaust narrative are truly misleading they are not what they say they are. They show pictures that are not related to the topic on hand. The propaganda machine established by the Jews is working overtime with most of these pictures.


    Comment by Jim Rizoli — January 31, 2017 @ 5:02 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: