Scrapbookpages Blog

February 7, 2017

Descendants of Auschwitz staff members are now being harassed

Filed under: Germany, Holocaust — Tags: , , — furtherglory @ 6:22 am
My photo of the gate into the Auschwitz II camp

My photo of the gate into the Auschwitz II camp

My photo into the Auschwitz I camp

My photo of the “Arbeit macht Frei” gate into the Auschwitz I camp

The first three laws of the Jewish religion are 1. Revenge 2. Revenge and 3. Revenge.  The Jews can never get enough Revenge.

In this recent news article, you can read about how the descendants of Auschwitz staff members are now being harassed by today’s Jews:

http://forward.com/fast-forward/362323/auschwitz-promises-anonymity-to-nazi-descendants-in-return-for-documents/

Begin quote from the news article:

The Auschwitz Museum is asking Germans and Austrians to donate Nazi documents about the death camp and it’s making a big concession in return.

It’s promising to grant the donors anonymity — and a guarantee their identities won’t be shared. The names of Auschwitz staff are already online, but descendants might not want to publicize that aspect of their family history.

“Without a comprehensive analysis and understanding of the motivation and mentality of the perpetrators, our efforts to wisely counsel future generations will only remain intuitive,” said Museum Director Dr. Piotr M. A. Cywiński in an appeal published on the museum’s website.

After the war, only a few sets of photos and private letters from SS staff members were found, alongside some single diaries.

To change that, the museum is asking for any documents, photos, personal letters or diaries that used to belong to SS officers or other people working at the Auschwitz-Birkenau camp.

“I am absolutely convinced that only a mutual effort can lead to a fuller understanding of the mechanisms of hatred,” Director Cywiński said. “Analyses from the perspective of the victims … cannot fully serve the purpose.”

The museum is reaching out to newspapers in Germany and Austria to publicize the cause.

End quote

47 Comments »

  1. So, the Auschwitz Museum has already published a list of former SS staff online – but I searched in vain on the internet for even a partial inventory of names who those who were allegedly gassed there.

    It would appear that the gassed victims are not very important in the great scheme of things ( or perhaps they never existed in the first place ) – while there is verifiable evidence of named camp personnel.

    But when the absence of any named victims is combined with the lack of any human remains of the one million one hundred thousand human beings who are alleged to have been murdered there – then I’m afraid the Auschwitz museum has got to do much better in convincing the world that some sort of holocaust event took place there.

    A list of former camp personnel, and a public appeal for diaries, letters and photos isn’t going to help very much I’m afraid.

    Comment by Talbot — February 7, 2017 @ 3:40 pm

  2. You cant trust any of the documents coming from the Holohuxsters as they would most likely be tampered with to support their HoloHoax story.

    JR

    Comment by Jim Rizoli — February 7, 2017 @ 1:56 pm

  3. Although Museum Director Dr. Cywiński is making a public declaration that donors will remain anonymous, there is no guarantee that when he retires, or is replaced, that subsequent directors will feel obliged to continue with such a policy. And neither will there be any restriction on museum staff from handing on donors names and addresses to outsiders within the holohoax industry and their lawyers.

    So my advice to donors is not to get involved – Auschwitz is such a dishonest place, that it is bound to attract dishonest people on to its staff, and thus one cannot trust the words of any of its personnel.

    Comment by Talbot — February 7, 2017 @ 7:27 am

    • Utter nonsense, Talbot. There is no benefit for the Auschwitz Museum to break its word.

      Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 7:29 am

      • You wrote: “There is no benefit for the Auschwitz Museum to break its word.”

        The Auschwitz Museum might break it’s word because it can. The Museum staff does not have to “benefit” in order to break their word. Remember that the word “jew” is sometimes used as a verb, meaning to cheat people.

        Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 9:23 am

        • Are you saying that only Jews work in the Auschwitz Museum?

          Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 10:10 am

          • I spent several days visiting the Auschwitz Museum and I wrote about it on my website at
            http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/Tour/Auschwitz1/Auschwitz11.html

            There was no way to tell if the people working in the Auschwitz museum were Jewish, but I am guessing that they were all Jewish people.

            Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 10:32 am

            • So, you don’t know and therefore cannot comment on the reliability of the people that work there.

              Got it.

              Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 10:44 am

              • You wrote: “So, you don’t know and therefore cannot comment on the reliability of the people that work there.”

                As far as I am concerned, I believe that all the people who work at any of the Holocaust museums are Jewish.

                Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 11:07 am

                • “As far as I am concerned, I believe that all the people who work at any of the Holocaust museums are Jewish.”

                  Boy, that’s a reasonable assumption to make. You did graduate with a Journalism Degree from Missouri, right? That’s a prestigious Journalism school. Did they teach you that? To make random assumptions with no facts?

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 11:19 am

    • In fact, one could read into Dr. Cywiński’s utterances an open invitation for forgers and fabricators to set to work immediately, and start manufacturing all kinds of documents, letters, photos and diaries that purport to have been found in some dusty attic in the home of former SS Obersturmbannfuher, Otto von What’s-his-name.

      Comment by Talbot — February 7, 2017 @ 9:18 am

      • You wrote: “one could read into Dr. Cywiński’s utterances an open invitation for forgers and fabricators to set to work immediately,”

        Good point! I believe that this will happen immediately. There will be a lot of papers, aged with tea stains, that will appear immediately.

        Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 9:27 am

      • Well then, you might have some forgeries you can actually prove, Talbot.

        Or, is that a guess?

        Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 10:11 am

        • You wrote: “you might have some forgeries you can actually prove”

          I wrote about Holocaust forgeries on this blog post:
          https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2012/12/28/fake-holocaust-photos-at-the-united-states-holocaust-memorial-museum/

          Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 10:24 am

          • Yeah, Carolyn Yeager has no credibility with me but thanks for the link.

            Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 10:27 am

            • You wrote: “Carolyn Yeager has no credibility with me”

              Why do you say that she has no credibility? What mistakes has she made on her website?

              Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 10:35 am

              • Her biggest one is that she denied the existence of Eli Wiesel’s tattoo. Also, she’s really nothing more than a glorified groupie.

                Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 10:47 am

                • You wrote: “Her [Carolyn Yeager] biggest one [lie] is that she denied the existence of Eli Wiesel’s tattoo.

                  Ms. Yeager was correct when she denied that Elie Wiesel had no tattoo. He finally admitted it, just before he died. I blogged about this at

                  https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2016/01/08/elie-wiesel-admits-that-he-has-no-concentration-camp-tattoo/

                  Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 11:02 am

                • No, he did no such thing. That’s just more discredited crap from Carolyn Yeager.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 11:04 am

                • I have put up a new blog post about Elie Wiesel. Read it and weep!

                  Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 11:40 am

                • I did and I’ve already commented on it.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 11:46 am

                • You are a “groupie” too – full of undiluted admiration for people who you call “real” historians.

                  Such as “Hapless Hilburg” – who had never done any research on the ground into these holocaust sites, and thus when he came to a court of law, had to admit “I’m at a loss”.

                  Comment by Talbot — February 7, 2017 @ 11:17 am

                • “You are a “groupie” too – full of undiluted admiration for people who you call “real” historians.”

                  Undiluted?

                  I wrote this in response to Cesarani’s assertion that Operation Tannenberg contributed far more to the destruction of Europe’s Jews than the T-4 Program:

                  http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=27594

                  “Such as “Hapless Hilburg” – who had never done any research on the ground into these holocaust sites, and thus when he came to a court of law, had to admit “I’m at a loss”.

                  That’s really the wrong one to point out to me, Talbot. I’ve never Hilberg’s book(s) on the Holocaust. I want to but frankly they are a bit pricey.

                  But, did all Holocaust research just suddenly end in the 1960’s, Talbot? Is Hilberg the final word on the matter?

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 11:41 am

                • Hilberg was certainly the “pin-up boy” for the holohoaxers back in the good old days – I hope you are not implying that revisionist scholars have come along since and scandalously revised his sacred work.

                  Comment by Talbot — February 7, 2017 @ 11:46 am

                • Uh, no.
                  😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

                  “Revisionist scholars.”

                  😂😂😂

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 11:48 am

                • I didn’t mean Revisionist scholars amongst those who question the holocaust – but those who reside within the “Believer camp”. Have they been involved in some of that naughty Revisionism themselves, and wilfully challenged the great guru of holocaustianity.

                  Comment by Talbot — February 7, 2017 @ 12:01 pm

                • What’s to challenge, Talbot? I can’t speak to what Hilberg said because I’ve never read his books. What I can say is that new information is found that builds upon earlier research. No one had access to what the Soviets had until the USSR fell.
                  But, the basics remain the same. I’ve read Gerlach and Cesarani, along with Van Pelt, Rees, Arad and others wrote about the subject. I don’t know about Hilberg because I’ve never read his books on this.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 12:35 pm

                • You wrote: ” don’t know about Hilberg because I’ve never read his books on this.”

                  You can’t call yourself a Holocaust scholar unless you have read Hilberg. I blogged about him at

                  https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/tag/raul-hilberg/

                  Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 2:13 pm

                • Well, I’ve read Arad, Browning, Cesarani, Gerlach, Hayes (just started on that one), Rees and some others I can’t remember off hand.

                  Those count?

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 2:30 pm

                • You listed Holocaust writers, whose books you have read; then you ask if these count. No, you must read books by Germar Rudolf before you can call yourself an expert: https://holocausthandbooks.com/index.php?author_id=1

                  Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 2:39 pm

                • Why? Isn’t he just some denier?

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 2:45 pm

                • You wrote: “Why? Isn’t he [Germar Rudolf] just come denier?

                  No, Germar Rudolf is not “just some denier”.

                  Germar is the BEST of the deniers.

                  Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 2:50 pm

                • I’m glad you cleared that up for me.

                  Life is still too short to read one of his books. I read some of the Holocaust Handbooks some time ago, it’s time I’ll never get back.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 2:56 pm

                • Talking about wasted time hows the Skeptics site going?

                  JR

                  Comment by Jim Rizoli — February 7, 2017 @ 3:07 pm

                • Fine. We finally axed your “Trump will win!” thread and opened a new one.

                  We are missing our resident deniers. It’s too bad you couldn’t follow a few simple rules, Jim.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 3:22 pm

                • You wrote: “We finally axed your “Trump will win!” thread and opened a new one.”

                  Do you mean that “we” axed a thread on a discussion forum?

                  No one can “ax a thread” on my blog, except me.

                  You are getting mixed up, as you go back and forth, from a discussion forum to my blog.

                  Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 3:59 pm

                • We made the collective decision to stop adding additional comments.

                  It’s still there:

                  http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=39&t=27067

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 4:07 pm

                • You mentioned Cesarani, a famous Holocaust writer.

                  I wrote about Cesarani on this blog post:
                  https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2015/10/26/david-cesarani-famous-holocaust-historian-dead-at-58/

                  Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 2:44 pm

        • The “Hitler Diaries”.

          Comment by Talbot — February 7, 2017 @ 10:39 am

          • Is that the best you have?

            What does that have to do with anything?

            Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 10:48 am

            • Are you kidding me – this is the biggest forgery of the lot! You can’t get any greater than this gigantic fraud.

              If these scoundrels are prepared to deceive and falsify on this scale, then are they really going to balk at forged documents and what-have-you at grass roots level.

              Comment by Talbot — February 7, 2017 @ 11:16 am

              • Um, Talbot?

                The Hitler Diaries were forgeries created by this man:
                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Konrad_Kujau

                He was an East German whose family were committed Nazis, in other words, not a Jew.

                Here is the story of the Hitler Diaries:
                https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Diaries

                Hugh Trevor-Roper initially authenticated the Diaries but quickly changed his mind. Irving did the reverse, condemning the diaries as forgeries but just as quickly changing his mind, claiming they were authentic.

                The whole unraveled rather quickly and now we know that the diaries are fake.

                Why on earth would you use this as an example?

                Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 11:31 am

                • For all your old waffle – someone had deliberately set out to forge and deceive on a mammoth scale, and the so-called “great and the good” had initially decided to go along with it, until the edifice came crashing down in sheets of flame.

                  Comment by Talbot — February 7, 2017 @ 11:39 am

                • “For all your old waffle – someone had deliberately set out to forge and deceive on a mammoth scale, and the so-called “great and the good” had initially decided to go along with it, until the edifice came crashing down in sheets of flame.”

                  No, the diaries were controversial, Talbot. It took actual historians to disprove them.

                  Again, a really bad example. And not really related to the Holocaust.

                  Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 11:45 am

  4. How is this harassment? The museum is asking for documents from the descendants of those that worked there. They are offering anonymity to them. Fine. Where is the proof these people are being harassed by anyone?

    Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 6:26 am

    • You wrote: “The museum is asking for documents from the descendants of those that worked there. ”

      How would you like it if today’s Germans, who had nothing to do with the Holocaust, were asking the descendants, of Jews who had cheated their ancestors, for documents about how their relatives were cheated?

      Today’s Germans must be sick of Holocaust revenge, revenge, revenge.

      Comment by furtherglory — February 7, 2017 @ 7:05 am

      • First, that’s a ridiculous argument. Not every Jew cheated Germans.
        Second, why is it harassment to ask for documents regarding Auschwitz?

        BTW, I think things like this have happened before, museums asking for private documents regarding the Civil War or WW I. Is that harassment?

        Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — February 7, 2017 @ 7:18 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: