Scrapbookpages Blog

March 1, 2017

Don’t shade your eyes — plagerize

Filed under: Holocaust, Uncategorized — Tags: , — furtherglory @ 9:05 am

There is an on-going argument about the photos used by Caroline Yeager in a small book which she published many years ago. You can see a photo of the cover of the book on Ms. Yeager’s website at http://carolynyeager.net/auschwitz-underground-guided-tour

You can see the same photo on this page of my website: http://www.scrapbookpages.com/AuschwitzScrapbook/History/Articles/Crosses.html

This is the caption on my photo:

[My] 2005 photo of building where Carmelite nuns formerly lived

As you can see, the place where nuns formerly lived, outside the camp, has nothing to do with the subject of Yeager’s book.

When Yeager published her book, she was a complete newb, and she got much of her information from me. Now she specializes in attacking me. That’s the thanks I get for helping her.

46 Comments »

  1. There is a biblical reason why the Jews are hated….Thats enough for me. Dust off your Bibles and follow the logic.
    https://jrizoli.wordpress.com/2017/03/07/why-the-jews-are-hated/

    JR

    Comment by Jim Rizoli — March 7, 2017 @ 11:46 am

  2. FG. You’re far to forgiving. I know you’re not a believer,but my religious beliefs teach me,people like you are guaranteed a seat at the lords table.

    The “Bitch” published a book years back,with your “stolen” photos? WTF ! She pulled that stunt and you still welcome her on your site.

    You help her get started and she shits on you. She insults your visitors to your site. Saying in so many words,they don’t know shit. Hey,I’ve learned a lot from both sides here.

    She tells you she didn’t mean to insult you,then calls you senile. She comes up in here,swinging her dick like she pays the bills.

    You’re a text book example of a “lady” FG. You keep your composure with no problem.

    You should tell the bitch,”if you’re gonna f–k me,at least kiss me”. I salute you. You’re a true lady.

    Comment by Tim — March 3, 2017 @ 2:30 am

  3. Boring catfight. Any husband or brother around to keep the ladies separated… 😉

    Comment by hermie — March 1, 2017 @ 6:26 pm

    • You wrote: “Boring catfight.”

      That sounds like something that Sheldon Cooper would say on “The Big Bang Theory”.
      Your word “catfight” did not go through the spell checker. I think it should be “cat fight”. A superior man, like you, should know that, but a stupid woman, like me, can be excused for not knowing this.

      Comment by furtherglory — March 2, 2017 @ 5:17 am

      • Cat fight. That’s a bit sexist. There’s no fight here FG. You’re too forgiving

        Comment by Tim — March 3, 2017 @ 2:36 am

        • Tim wrote: “Cat fight. That’s a bit sexist.”

          I know. I’m a sexist, i.e. not a scared gender denier. The isms supposed & intended to intimidate & silence a specific group of people (most of time, Whites, males, Nationalists, or/and Gentiles) for domination purposes have no impact on me. Too obviously a fraud for me. Just another instance of the Judeo-supremacist “divide and conquer.” Feminist terrorism is a mere tool of Jewish tyranny, a kosher weapon of mass destruction against the family unit. I’m immune to such a weapon. I can at best pretend that I’m terrorized by feminist bullies, but I can’t prevent myself from laughing inside anyway.

          Comment by hermie — March 3, 2017 @ 7:03 am

          • Translation: Hermie hates women, and gets mad seeing them not being outside their husbands’ houses. Hermie can’ stand women having an opinion, voting, making decisions or anything else than cooking, cleaning and making babies. Probably, Hermie is a little jealous of women, too.

            FG, you should know this: After publishing a post, you can change its title with no consequences at all. Try it from your dashboard. The slug of the post (the URL) will stay the same. I know the reason you believe that changing a title the whole post will be gone. It’s because you see that the slug/URL is created according to the words in the title of the post, at the exact time you’re writing it. But AFTER you publish a post, the slug/URL can’t be changed by its own (unless you want to change it and go for it, which is not our case here).
            Trust me on this, I know WordPress for many many years. You can change a title with no fear at all.

            Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 3, 2017 @ 11:43 am

            • You wrote: “After publishing a post, you can change its title with no consequences at all.”

              I consulted a software engineer who used to work at Apple in the very early days. He says that if you change the title of a blog post, this will change how your post is ranked in search results. If the original title was ranked first in the search results on that subject, it will no longer be ranked first because it is now considered a new post, not an old post that has a new title.

              Comment by furtherglory — March 3, 2017 @ 5:33 pm

              • FG wroteQ

                I consulted a software engineer who used to work at Apple in the very early days. He says that if you change the title of a blog post, this will change how your post is ranked in search results. If the original title was ranked first in the search results on that subject, it will no longer be ranked first because it is now considered a new post, not an old post that has a new title.

                This maybe is true, if you change completely (replace) your title. If you change a couple of letters, like it’s the case here (plagiarize vs plagerize) nothing will happen.
                And of course, your fear was losing everything, the post, the comments etc. You won’t lose them. I hope the software engineer told you that.

                Anyway, the case that the software engineer is talking about has nothing to do with you and your posts. He’s talking for ranks for big media.The rank discussion doesn’t apply here.

                See for yourself:
                I wrote ‘plagerize’ and you’re on No 1, click

                I wrote ‘plagiarize’ and you’re still on No 1, click

                You may notice also that for minor typos, the search engine ‘corrects’ you, so you don;t have to fear anything.

                Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 3, 2017 @ 11:55 pm

            • Kleon wrote: “Translation: Hermie hates women, and gets mad seeing them not being outside their husbands’ houses. Hermie can’ stand women having an opinion, voting, making decisions or anything else than cooking, cleaning and making babies. Probably, Hermie is a little jealous of women, too.”

              Great. Another fantastic translation/decoding by a Holohoaxster. Good analysis, Professor Moron. Very deep. As always…

              Only men who like seeing women behave like men, actually hate women. Such men don’t even realize that their pejorative description of housewives and mothers, always full of disdain and contempt for the honorable traditional roles of women, reveals their own dislike of womanhood. One doesn’t show one’s love for cats or dogs by requesting that the latter behave like cows or ducks. There is of course nothing shameful for a woman in devoting her life raising her children and taking care of her family. Only true misogynists can claim otherwise. I hope that the grandmothers and female ancestors of such men realize how fortunate they are to have descendants who think they were just failures that spoiled their life. With such ‘friends,’ nobody needs foes…

              Comment by hermie — March 3, 2017 @ 6:42 pm

              • Hermie, you read too much the Daily Stormer and you’re sound like a copy machine.

                Btw, what happened to the armed march in Whitefish, Montana? Chicken?

                Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 3, 2017 @ 11:58 pm

                • Kleon wrote: “Hermie, you read too much the Daily Stormer and you’re sound like a copy machine.”

                  …says the parrot of mainstream moral standards and beliefs. Ha ha ha ha….

                  Kleon wrote: “Btw, what happened to the armed march in Whitefish, Montana? Chicken?”

                  Don’t know. I had never heard about this anti-Jewish march before you mentioned it.

                  Comment by hermie — March 4, 2017 @ 7:17 am

                • Oh, no, Hermie, you’re wrong.
                  Here’s where you find only parrots repeating the same old boring and paranoid stuff.

                  And here’s where you can find really smart and intelligent people who have read thousands of real scholars’ and scientists’ books, people with lots of deep knowledge and capable of duscussing in depth every single Holocaust issue in detail and with a great success.

                  And here’s where you can find stupid racists meme-sh*tlords twerps

                  I belong to the second group. Guess where you belong.

                  Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 4, 2017 @ 7:57 am

                • It seems that we’ve already reached the limits of your intellectual abilities. So sad…

                  Hilarious to see that you sincerely believe you don’t just repeat the dominant values and beliefs of our societies. Keep your moving enthusiasm and self delusion.

                  Comment by hermie — March 4, 2017 @ 8:10 am

              • Hermie, the deep thinker, speaking about women:

                – One doesn’t show one’s love for cats or dogs by requesting that the latter behave like cows or ducks.

                Not only compares women to animals but gives women in advance the role he thinks is good for these animals.

                – I, Hermie, say you should behave the way I decide, or else I’ll put you in another lower category.

                Why not let THEM decide if they want to behave like dogs or like ducks, Hermie?

                Here comes the ‘women are incapable for such decisions’ line. Hermie reads them on the Daily Stormer.

                But he doesn’t hate women, sure, yeah, whatever.

                Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 4, 2017 @ 12:18 am

                • You wrote: “[Hermie] Not only compares women to animals but gives women in advance the role he thinks is good for these animals.”

                  It is not Hermie’s fault. Women pretend to be stupid because they know that men think women are stupid.

                  Comment by furtherglory — March 4, 2017 @ 4:31 am

                • FG wrote:
                  – Women pretend to be stupid because they know that men think women are stupid

                  This maybe or maybe not is accurate, it depends upon each person’s believe system (I’m a man and I don;t think women are stupid, or all of them pretend to be stupid because of what men may think of them), but what does is have to do with the fact that men like Hermie think they can decide what role is the perfect role for women?

                  Or more in general, why should someone has the right to decide for another person about the role that other person should have.

                  There’s a piece of paper written back in 1948. It’s called Human Rights Declaration or something like that. Hermie is incompetent to understand that National Socialism can just exist by its own in a given country. National Socialism means that country should be always at war, because this is what strong countries do. Attacking weak countries before anyone else attacks NS countries. This is inevitable for National Socialism, like laws of nature, and the first main reason National Socialism can’t exist. The other reason is this piece of paper I’ve mentioned.

                  Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 4, 2017 @ 6:10 am

                • Kleon wrote: “Not only compares women to animals but gives women in advance the role he thinks is good for these animals.”

                  I guess that’s what happens when 2 too different IQs dialogues. I didn’t compare women to animals, genius. I was just trying to explain that love implies respect for the nature of someone. Wanting someone to be what you want him/her to be, instead of what he/she is naturally/essentially, is not love. You think that you love women, but you hate, despise and ridicule what they are naturally. You want them to be what you believe they should be. The problem of all the anti-natural ideologists like yourself.

                  Kleon wrote: “Why not let THEM decide if they want to behave like dogs or like ducks, Hermie?”

                  Average people, men and women, decide nothing. They just do what they were told to do, and delude themselves with a sweet ego-flattering misbelief that they decide(d) this or that all by themselves. The illusion of free & independent choice is and will always be a mere comforting mirage for most people. Pure ego tripping and self delusion…

                  Comment by hermie — March 4, 2017 @ 7:41 am

                • Excellent comment, Hermie. You are a talented writer.

                  Comment by furtherglory — March 4, 2017 @ 7:56 am

                • Wanting someone to be what you want him/her to be, instead of what he/she is naturally/essentially, is not love. You think that you love women, but you hate, despise and ridicule what they are naturally. You want them to be what you believe they should be. The problem of all the anti-natural ideologists like yourself.

                  No, the truth is YOU want to define the roles, regardless of other people’s desires. You just not allowed to do it. Learn to live with it.
                  I know it’s the essence of your thought, also for making examples and metaphors with animals, when you’re supposed to talk about human behavior.
                  You should now have learned your lesson and don’t use animals again, even for describing ‘roles’.

                  As for the ‘anti-natural’, the only anti-natural here is you believing you can order another person’s freedom boundaries or roles.

                  Who are you to define what’s ‘natural’ and what’s not. You’re the delusional here, just because you ever thought you can do this. You can’t.

                  But you’re a nazi. And you think ‘this is the natural thing’. This is your greatest illusion. There is not such a thing as something ‘natural by its own’. It’s always the environment.
                  It’s not ‘the blood’ as you like to believe. It’s a human’s desires. Learn to live with it, too.

                  Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 4, 2017 @ 8:12 am

                • Kleon wrote: “Hermie is incompetent to understand that National Socialism can just exist by its own in a given country. National Socialism means that country should be always at war, because this is what strong countries do. Attacking weak countries before anyone else attacks NS countries. This is inevitable for National Socialism, like laws of nature, and the first main reason National Socialism can’t exist.”

                  Since 1945, was there a single year when the democratic United States of America was not at war with other countries? The best example of a strong country repeatedly attacking weak countries is undeniably that of the United States of America and its bloody [tw]history. Funny to see the people like yourself claim that National Socialism means war while the hard facts (not the self-revering story coined by the victors of 1945) show that WW2 was in fact the offspring of the democratic United States and a specific clique in Britain, and that Hitler worked very hard in order to avoid a second worldwide armed conflagration if possible. But victors never start wars and we all know who won WW2….

                  Another great illustration of the principle that false information always leads to false lessons and new mistakes.

                  Comment by hermie — March 4, 2017 @ 7:59 am

                • Furtherglory wrote: “Excellent comment, Hermie. You are a talented writer.”

                  Thanks for your kind words, FG. You’re a talented writer too. Without any sycophancy on my part.

                  Comment by hermie — March 4, 2017 @ 8:02 am

                • Kleon wrote: “No, the truth is YOU want to define the roles, regardless of other people’s desires. You just not allowed to do it. Learn to live with it.”

                  As I said in my previous comment, most people have no independent desires (except for their basic instinctive desires such as sex and hunger). They just desire, want and do what they were told to want, desire and do. Why do think that the Masons made so much effort to capture our countries’ ministries of education (or whatever other name) and that the Jews made so much effort to capture our countries’ mass media? Because they think that people do as they (the latter) wish? Of course not ! Makes no sense. They did that because they think that most people are like lemmings one can train so that they do what one wants from them. Hence also their intensive social engineering of several centuries, i.e. the huge effort they had to make in order to divert people from their true nature and make them accept unnatural things as normal and natural things as dangerous & detrimental. Or in other words, in order to make every generation of human lemmings closer to their ideal man (the uprooted nomad of their Global village) than the previous one was.

                  Kleon wrote: “I know it’s the essence of your thought, also for making examples and metaphors with animals, when you’re supposed to talk about human behavior. You should now have learned your lesson and don’t use animals again, even for describing ‘roles’.”

                  Who do you think you are?!? I’ll keep using metaphors with animals as often as I want to do it. I grew up with Jean De La Fontaine’s metaphoric stories. That’s my culture. I see no insult in metaphors with animals. Learn to live with it.

                  Comment by hermie — March 4, 2017 @ 10:08 am

                • The Masons capturing our countries’ ministries of education and the Jews capturing our countries’ mass media and all this stuff with social engineering to make every generation of human lemmings closer to their ideal man (the uprooted nomad of their Global village) etc exist only on some paranoid people’s minds. They are only conspiracy theories with no proof and hard data. You think they’re real because you learn to hate, and you need someone to hate for your failures (Not yours, personally, in general, for all people who lose control and want someone to blame). You need to ‘spot the Jew’ in every single aspect of your life because you desperately need to hate someone for your misfortune.

                  But hating the other for what it happened to be born (something that only by accident we haven’t born the same) is completely different.
                  Or thinking of other people as a whole that they are all the same, from the same bad material, because they share the same religion or race or nation.
                  Neither this exists in nature.

                  We, civilized persons, have to think for each individual as a separate and unique case and see if he/she is good or bad, one by one.
                  We have to educate ourselves to control and to eradicate any bad feelings for anyone different from us.

                  You should know, this hate can destroy you very easily.
                  And that the hate that starts with the Jews, never ends with the Jews.

                  Antisemitism is only secondarily about Jews. Primarily it is about the failure of groups to accept responsibility for their own failures, and to build their own future by their own endeavours. No society that has fostered antisemitism has ever sustained liberty or human rights or religious freedom.

                  When bad things happen to a certain group of people, its members can react asking only one of these two questions: ‘What did we do wrong in the past?’ or ‘Who did this to us?’ The entire future of this group will depend on which question it chooses.

                  If it asks, ‘What did we do wrong?’ it’s OK. The self-criticism, which is essential to its progress, has begun.
                  If it asks, ‘Who did this to us?’ it defines itself as a victim. Then, they will seek the scapegoat to blame for all its trouble. Classically, Nr 1 potential suspect it’s the Jews.

                  Antisemitism is a form of cognitive failure, and it happens when people feel that their world is getting out of control.
                  From the Middle Ages to David Duke, this is the case. And this is what happened to the 1930s Germany.

                  That is what we need us to understand today. It wasn’t Jews alone who suffered under Hitler. It wasn’t Jews alone who suffered under Stalin. It isn’t Jews alone who suffer under ISIS or Al Qaeda or Islamic Jihad. We make a great mistake if we think antisemitism is a threat only to Jews. It is a threat, first and foremost, to our free way of living, in Europe and the US, and a threat to the freedoms it took centuries to achieve.
                  Antisemitism is not about Jews. It is about antisemites. It is about people who cannot accept responsibility for their own failures and have instead to blame someone else. Historically, if you were a Christian at the time of the Crusades, or a German after the First World War, and saw that the world hadn’t turned out the way you believed it would, you blamed the Jews. That is what is happening today. And I cannot begin to say how dangerous it is. Not just to Jews but to everyone who values freedom, compassion and humanity. The appearance of antisemitism in a culture is the first symptom of a disease, the early warning sign of collective breakdown.

                  Antisemitism has always been about the inability of a group to make space for difference. No group that adopts it will ever, can ever, create a free society.
                  Every society driven by hate begins by seeking to destroy its enemies, but ends by destroying itself.
                  The hate that begins with the Jews, never ends with the Jews

                  Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 4, 2017 @ 10:35 am

                • I read a news article.

                  Holocaust Deniers species are under threat of extinction.
                  https://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2782&start=330#p96321

                  [Begin quote]

                  Ten little Nazis, on a slow ‘phone line,
                  one “unsubscribed” from alt.holocaust
                  Drop it down to nine.

                  Nine little baiting fashes, all the Jews they hate
                  HC got a blogspot.
                  Oops, its down to eight!

                  Eight little magnifiers, “air photo,” heaven
                  along came 1005 “weather reports”
                  and blew it down to seven.”

                  Seven little codohista play with krema bricks
                  along came Smith and rodoh1
                  now theres only six!

                  Six little chimps, keep a fire alive
                  Berg got served a JREF Stundie
                  and sent that down to five!

                  Five little Anti-Sems, falling foul of law!
                  Van Pelt stood at Irving’s trial
                  now there’s only four…

                  Four little youtubes O turn the tidal sea.
                  Along comes Heath and Haimi.
                  Better make that three.

                  Three little Mattognoists, motley denier crew
                  Little Grey Rabbit’s…dated September…
                  Now theres only two.

                  Two little Holocaust deniers writing, “jew” for fun
                  Jason Wahrheit saw the crock
                  now there’s only one.

                  One little vid maker, coping with black bun
                  Rudolf failed Eric’s question
                  and that makes it none.

                  http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.gr/2017/03/ten-little-nazis.html

                  [End quote]

                  I’m sorry Jim you’ve been ignored.

                  Anyway, Holocaust Deniers must be under protection and we have to support their survival because a great source of laugh will be lost forever.

                  Save Holocaust Deniers.

                  Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 4, 2017 @ 1:03 pm

                • Apparently then all those who went to Auschwitz that I mentioned and showed the picture at the right as being in Auschwitz are wrong as well as your website that showed the right picture being Auschwitz too.
                  Toben was on the roof of Krema 1 in Auschwitz according to his comments….do you really think he was in Dachau? It was a flat roof?
                  David Macalden was there also on the flat roof and next to the detached chimney….so I guess he was in Dachau too?
                  They might want to get in touch with the tour guides who say the building, Krema 1 was in Dachau instead of the place they say they were saying it was Auschwitz. What I’m really looking for now is a picture taken from a birds eye view which shows all the buildings
                  then you will see what building is where.
                  Pretty confusing to say the least….

                  JR

                  Comment by Jim Rizoli — March 4, 2017 @ 1:23 pm

                • Nice lil’ Judeo-Masonic speech, Kleon. Already heard this BS thousands of times. You’re definitely a parrot.

                  Ever read what the Jew Bernard Lazare wrote about anti-Semitism? He correctly observed that anti-Semitism arose in so many different places, at so many different eras, and among so many different peoples, that it must come from Jews themselves. People like yourself always look for the origin of anti-Semitism in evil Goyim and develop groundless wacky theories supposed to whitewash the Jew himself by absolving him from any guilt in the periodic & ubiquitous emergence of anti-Semitism. Such a method gave birth to great pieces of comedy (hilarious extravagant writings) but it also prevented most Jews from reforming themselves in order to stop irritating the peoples crazy enough for hosting a number of Chosenites within their borders.

                  Your funny outburst in favor of individualism fell flat. One needs to be totally blind or extremely prejudiced to dare to deny Jewry’s cohesiveness, group strategies, and common agenda (or “their divine mission” as they often put it). You can’t deny that Jews believe their god tasked them with the unification of this world and that they work for the coming of their Messianic era. And you can’t deny either that their divine mission implies the destruction of all the Gentile “artificial constructions” supposedly keeping humans separated from each others and preventing them from living in a world universally at peace. The Masonic involvement in the Jewish Messianic project aims at universal fraternity and peace. Both, Jews & Masons, think that the liberation of humanity from its [alleged] chains involves the obliteration of the specificities and distinctiveness of all the Gentile peoples in this world. In other words, they believe that a unified world in peace can emerge only when human diversity has been annihilated. Peace through uniformity is their credo.

                  Like yourself, the Judeo-Masonic Globalists and their useful idiots allow (tolerate) only diversity between individuals and strictly forbid the survival of any other kind of human diversities (except for the portion of human diversity that Jewry is, of course). First, they deny that such diversities even exist, and then, they work to annihilate these diversities by various means. Anti-Semitism and anti-Masonism didn’t come from nothing, or from dumb hatred, or from a frustration supposedly derived from some personal failures (ludicrous pop psychology), as often claimed. It came, and still comes, from the resistance of some people willing to oppose the rise of the Globalist Judeo-Masonic world (or more accurately, the destruction of all that is dear to them by the Globalist scum). Globalists always depict their opponents as dumb haters and dangerous murderers. But they, Globalists, hate the humanity that is attached to its ancestral land, culture, race, people, moral standards, traditions, customs, beliefs, etc. THEY are haters and destroyers. Calling their opponents haters and destroyers is nothing but a blatant instance of accusatory inversion on their part.

                  Comment by hermie — March 4, 2017 @ 7:07 pm

                • How do you think this ‘International Jewry’ or ‘Judeo-Masonic Globalist Great Conspiracy’ that you believe in operates? Give me real data, not ‘all names in Hollywood are Jewish’. How the supposed International Jewry takes over all world institutions and acts inside governments?

                  Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 5, 2017 @ 12:25 am

                • Don’t be ridiculous, Kleon. I didn’t talk about a Great Conspiracy. Both gangs, Jews and Masons, operate in broad daylight to a large extent. They operate by co-opting as many people sharing their views as possible and by indoctrinating the masses through mass media and schools (in order to make the latter adhere gradually to their own views). In other words, they use the same methods as those of the Church(es) during numerous centuries, but with modern tools and in larger areas. The Church(es) didn’t need to plot in cellars at night as suspicious conspirators to be able to get a hand on very numerous peoples and work to advance its (their) agenda for centuries. Of course, they didn’t say everything openly. They maneuvered, cheated and lied. They kept some things in the dark or at the sight of a few. But most of their activities were performed in plain sight and by the increasingly strong support of the masses for their project of a unified and pacified world universally worshiping Jesus Christ. Your attempt to portray any collaborative project on a large scale as a pure delirium possible only in the minds of paranoid conspiracy theorists, has been demolished many times in the course of history. Instances of such projects took place on numerous occasions throughout history. It is the magnitude of the phenomenon that is remarkable in the Judeo-Masonic Globalist project. Apart from that, nothing very original in it. The Judeo-Masonic project is now more a current of thoughts than a real plot. A number of its advocates don’t know all its aspects, origins and purposes, but it’s far from being hidden or secret. The Globalists would of course not have installed a sculpture of Isaiah’s Messianic prophecy about swords beaten into plowshares if they had wanted to keep their plans and aims hidden and secret.


                  Zionist monthly The Maccabean, January 1920

                  Comment by hermie — March 5, 2017 @ 7:34 am

                • Hermie

                  – The Judeo-Masonic project is now more a current of thoughts than a real plot. A number of its advocates don’t know all its aspects, origins and purposes, but it’s far from being hidden or secret. The Globalists would of course not have installed a sculpture of Isaiah’s Messianic prophecy about swords beaten into plowshares if they had wanted to keep their plans and aims hidden and secret.

                  Hermie, if it’s not hidden and it’s not a secret, then it’s just a set of ideas. You called it ‘a current of thoughts’, and since there are people involved with (or without) their will in it, why do you call it ‘Judeo-Masonic’ at the same time? According to you, a lot of people work for it (and very few Jews as a consequence), so where are its Judeo-Masonic origins? Someone could say ‘it’s not Judeo-Masonic anymore, it belongs to all people’.

                  What is the exact Jewish aspect of it? Its founders, like Marx, Freud, Einstein etc, who were Jewish? Or you see talmudic similarities and stuff? You think this set of ideas is the plot itself?

                  Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 5, 2017 @ 8:38 am

                • Edit: read “Isaiah’s Messianic prophecy about swords beaten into plowshares right in front of their own headquarters if” instead of “Isaiah’s Messianic prophecy about swords beaten into plowshares if”.

                  Comment by hermie — March 5, 2017 @ 7:49 am

                • Kleon wrote: “Hermie, if it’s not hidden and it’s not a secret, then it’s just a set of ideas. You called it ‘a current of thoughts’, and since there are people involved with (or without) their will in it, why do you call it ‘Judeo-Masonic’ at the same time? According to you, a lot of people work for it (and very few Jews as a consequence), so where are its Judeo-Masonic origins? Someone could say ‘it’s not Judeo-Masonic anymore, it belongs to all people’. What is the exact Jewish aspect of it? Its founders, like Marx, Freud, Einstein etc, who were Jewish? Or you see talmudic similarities and stuff? You think this set of ideas is the plot itself?”

                  Its Jewish origins are in the Jewish religious writings about the Jewish mission, the return of the Jews to the Holy Land & the Messianic era in general. And its Masonic origins are in the Masonic mission to work with Jewry in order to bring the coming of Messianic era, i.e. to unify the world in universal fraternity and peace (liberty, equality, fraternity), rebuild Solomon ‘s Temple in Jerusalem and resettle the entire Jewish people in biblical ‘Palestine’ (Greater Israel), where a Jewish Messiah will emerge and administer their unified world at peace, they believe.

                  The exact Jewish aspect of it is, beyond its ideological blueprint (briefly explained above), the use by the Jews of their influence to change the world in order to make their Messiah come. In concrete terms, this means that the Jews use their leading positions in media (propaganda), banks (funding) and politics (legislations) to annihilate the Gentile nation-states, races, peoples, cultures, religions, traditions, customs, & specificities/identities in general and unify the world under a single government because they believe that their Messiah won’t come before they have achieved that. The Masons, their useful idiots, regard themselves as liberators who must break the ‘chains’ attaching humans to specific [national, racial, cultural, religious, etc.] communities. They believe that such ‘chains’ enslave humanity and that everybody will be happier when finally freed from all those annoying borders between humans. They also believe that the obliteration of those borders between humans will cancel any reason for quarrel among humans and thus bring peace all over the world forever. After various experiments (including the British Empire and Communism), the architects of Globalism have now opted for the building of their New World Order through Western-style Capitalist democracies, their best horse so far. Wars and color revolutions (such as those in Eastern Europe and North Africa) are means among others used by the Globalists to overthrow the regimes deemed detrimental to Globalism and replace such regimes by Western-style democracies, as well as to make room for the birth of Greater Israel (Syria, Iraq and other counties in that area) and the rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple (implying the demolition of the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem).

                  Comment by hermie — March 5, 2017 @ 10:41 am

                • Oh for f**k’s sake, it’s Protocols of the Elder’s of Zion again.
                  Protocols is a piece plagiarized from the Dialogue between Machiavelli and Montesquieu in Hell by Maurice Joly, and has been the foundation for just about every claim regarding the Jewish “one world government” conspiracy ever since.

                  Hermie, honestly you’re the most stupid person I’ve ever seen in my whole life. Not because you’re stupid like a moron. In fact you’re smart, intelligent and well-informed. But exactly for this, believing in this Protocols garbage, this is the reason you look incredibly stupid.

                  Are you serious, the ‘Kalergi Plan’?
                  Hahahaha, unbelievable, hate makes irrational people totally blind, and they see only what they want to see.

                  Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi and “the Kalergi Plan”

                  Many times when you encounter holocaust deniers and they try to prove to you the holocaust is a hoax, they never seem to be able to focus on one issue. They are more than happy to leave the time period in question altogether, hop on their nazi time machine, and jump all over the place regarding the timeline of history when it comes to cherry picking their little world view, on how Jews are the root of all evil. From reminding us who killed Christ to Talmudic prophecy and numerology to the “Out of Khazaria” theory to the Napoleonic Wars and the Rothschild Family tree to secret societies like the Freemasons, Illuminati and Bohemian Grove, to who REALLY started WW1, to the early roots of the European Union, to modern day Israel and its mistreatment of Palestinians, it is nigh impossible to nail down a holocaust denier on the holocaust itself and discuss a topic (one aspect of this event that itself is extensive) at length. With this behavior, they make it almost impossible for someone to follow them through their time machine of antisemitism and prove them wrong on every account. It’s also the reason why this section of my presentation will try to partake a little bit in this wild goose chase all over history and show that the fraudulent modus operandi of holocaust deniers is not just evident in their attempts to distort holocaust historiography, but pretty much wherever else they go as well.

                  One such notion, is their claim that a man named Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi is the spiritual father of the European Union, and the spiritual father of race-mixing, and with it, the downfall/genocide/ethnocide of distinct European ethnic national identities as well. In fact, this topic even made it to the European Parliament itself, when it was brought up by the raving cross-eyed lunatic going by the name of Nick Griffin (BNP member)! See:

                  …which is why Kalergi is an oft used buzzword among the same circles that cry White Genocide because they can’t get laid.

                  It is interesting to note, that these same people who talk about a Jewish conspiracy to control gentiles, conveniently forget to mention that Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi was, in fact, NOT a Jew at all.

                  Richard Nikolaus Eijiro, Count of Coudenhove-Kalergi (1894 – 1972) was an Austrian-Japanese politician, and philosopher. A pioneer of European integration, he served as the founding president of the Paneuropean Union for 49 years. His parents were Heinrich von Coudenhove-Kalergi, Austro-Hungarian diplomat, and Mitsuko Aoyama, daughter of an oil merchant, antiques-dealer, and landowner in Tokyo.

                  His first book, Pan-Europa, was published in 1923, and contained a membership form for the Pan-Europa movement which held its first Congress in Vienna in 1926. Coudenhove-Kalergi indeed proposed Beethoven’s Ode to Joy as the music for the European Anthem.

                  But this is where the similarities end. The antisemites go on to say that Kalergi not only drafted the so-called “Kalergi Plan”, but also stated in his works that he wanted a mixed race Europe, and with it, the destruction of distinct European ethnic identities. The dimwitted morons who parrot this probably dedicated a grand total of 5 minutes of research to get this information instead of finding any of the supposed quotes in Kalergi’s books themselves.

                  Kalergi never said he WANTS Europe to become a mixed race continent – it’s just a hypothesized observation/prediction he made of the future (you know, like Southpark had that one episode where time travelers from the future are all mixed race). Nor did he EVER imply that Jews will rule over this race in the future. As usual, these convictions come when taking this nonsense from secondary sources (aka neo nazi websites) instead of primary sources.

                  The “race of the future” is in fact a concept that has been hypothesized by many to be a theoretical composite race which will result from ongoing miscegenation. Kalergi predicted in his work “Practical Idealism” (Praktischer Idealismus) in 1925: “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.” see: Praktischer Idealismus (Wien/Leipzig 1925), page 23

                  The same scenario had been envisaged, with rather less enthusiasm, by Madison Grant in his 1916 “The Passing of the Great Race”, calling for a eugenics program to prevent this development, and in a similar ideological context in Lothrop Stoddard’s “The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy” in 1920.

                  In 1933 Kalergi responded to the ascendance of National Socialism by collaborating with Heinrich Mann, Arthur Holitscher, Lion Feuchtwanger, and Max Brod in writing and publishing the pamphlet “Gegen die Phrase vom jüdischen Schädling” (Against the Phrase ‘Jewish Parasite’).

                  The other claim, that Jews will rule over this new mixed-race, is also baseless. The origin of this can be found many pages later in Kalergi’s book, in a completely different context:

                  “Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process [of persecution]. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation.” see: Praktischer Idealismus, page 50

                  For further reading, see:
                  http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/White_extinction_scenario
                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_genocide_conspiracy_theory

                  You know there’s no evidence for all these junk you’ve said. The protocols is something very flexible that can be adapted in every era, every country, every situation and fit everywhere. It only give an excuse to morons for hating more the Jews because they’re different. You live in the computer age but you’re stuck in the Middle Ages. The Protocols of the Elder’s of Zion.

                  I’m making you a favor, try read something rational and logical:

                  Comment by Κλέων Ι. — March 7, 2017 @ 11:24 am

                • You wrote: “it’s Protocols of the Elder’s of Zion again.”

                  I wrote about the Protocols on this blog post:
                  https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/tag/wilhelm-marr/

                  Comment by furtherglory — March 7, 2017 @ 11:33 am

                • “the Jews have a mission in life….” by Theodor Kaufman

                  Comment by hermie — March 5, 2017 @ 10:48 am

                • Kleon wrote: “Oh for f**k’s sake, it’s Protocols of the Elder’s of Zion again. Protocols is a piece plagiarized from the Dialogue between Machiavelli and Montesquieu in Hell by Maurice Joly, and has been the foundation for just about every claim regarding the Jewish “one world government” conspiracy ever since. Hermie, honestly you’re the most stupid person I’ve ever seen in my whole life. Not because you’re stupid like a moron. In fact you’re smart, intelligent and well-informed. But exactly for this, believing in this Protocols garbage, this is the reason you look incredibly stupid.”

                  You’re the guy who mentioned the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. I never did. A forgery about a real plot, plan or policy doesn’t make such a plot, plan or policy false and unreal. I can write a forged document about a specific policy, but my forged document won’t mean that such a policy is not real. Ditto with the Protocols and the Jewish & Masonic divine mission of Global unification.

                  I thought that you would try to explain the benefits of the obvious Globalist plan, not that you would try to deny it. You deserve the Award of the European Prize Coudenhove-Kalergi 2017 for this heroic attempt. Congrats !! 😉

                  Kleon wrote: “Are you serious, the ‘Kalergi Plan’? Hahahaha, unbelievable, hate makes irrational people totally blind, and they see only what they want to see.”

                  Your denial could be plausible if the EU of today didn’t look like an infernal vision stemming from the mind of Kalergi and his pairs.

                  Good luck with your work of bamboozlement intended to make people believe it’s sunny when they can see and feel it’s raining. You’ll need it. Because fewer and fewer people fail to realize they’re getting wet and your denials are nothing but desperate plain lies and evasions intended to save Jewish hegemony and agenda.

                  More than enough time wasted with you. Time from me to get out of here before you start quoting Hermann Rauschning or a similar fraud…

                  Kleon wrote: “I’m making you a favor, try read something rational and logical:”

                  Nothing new to me. Nice op psychology on all those evil deniers again, but we were not even talking about the ‘Holocaust.’ I think that your ‘obviousness denial’ has just brought me into the 10th stage of boredom…

                  Comment by hermie — March 7, 2017 @ 9:24 pm

          • Hermienator. You’re up on things. Let me ask you something. France and Germany are cozying up with each other.

            It something to do with Israel and Palestine. Why is Germany becoming close buddies with France ? France has already f–ked Germany twice.

            What about the Hebs. I don’t think they’ll like Germany going off on Israel. The Jews are already f–King Germany as it is

            Comment by Tim — March 5, 2017 @ 9:34 pm

            • Hi, Tim. I think that it came from a mixture of the actions by leaders with a sincere desire to avoid other damaging wars between France and Germany (De Gaulle’s main motive, IMO) and by Globalist liquidators working for a gradual dissolution of the French and German nation-states within the EU and the coming borderless Judeo-Masonic ‘Messianic’ word (N.W.O.).

              What do you think of this explanation, Tim?

              Comment by hermie — March 6, 2017 @ 9:18 pm

    • You wrote: “Boring catfight. Any husband or brother around to keep the ladies separated”

      Men have brains in their dick, not in their head. Women don’t have a dick, so they have no brains.

      Carry on with your insults while I decide whether to ban you from my blog.

      Comment by furtherglory — March 2, 2017 @ 6:19 am

      • Furtherglory wrote: “Your word “catfight” did not go through the spell checker. I think it should be “cat fight”. A superior man, like you, should know that”

        Yet I’ve often seen it written like this.

        FG wrote: “Men have brains in their dick, not in their head. Women don’t have a dick, so they have no brains. Carry on with your insults while I decide whether to ban you from my blog.”

        Visibly, women have no sense of humor either…

        Comment by hermie — March 2, 2017 @ 9:16 pm

  4. You’d think the Missouri School of Journalism would AT LEAST teach/enforce the spelling of “plagiarize.”

    Comment by Jett Rucker — March 1, 2017 @ 9:39 am

    • I am sure that I have already explained this. If I change the spelling of a word in the title of a blog post, it becomes a new blog post. Then I lose everything on the original blog post — all the comments, the number of hits, etc.

      If you were a graduate of the Missouri School of Journalism, as am I, you would know this.

      It doesn’t matter if there is a misspelling in the title of a blog post.

      Comment by furtherglory — March 1, 2017 @ 9:57 am

    • When you are through complaining about every word that I write on my blog, you need to do some work on your website, or your blog, or whatever you call it. As I am writing this, I recall that I have told you this before. Yes, I take memory pills, and I remember everything. “Inconvenient history” is very inconvenient for people who try to read it. Find a boy, or girl, in the 6th grade at your local school and have them upgrade it for you.

      Comment by furtherglory — March 1, 2017 @ 10:36 am

  5. FG….I still believe you have a mix up of the pictures of Dachau and Krema 1. IMO Krema 1 is the picture on the right taken in Auschwitz 1
    So far all the videos show that to be the case and I would like to put that story to rest. Even your website agrees with that finding which I posted already. The video of the girl in the pink winter jacket that I put up even says the building was in Auschwitz and she was an official tour guide. David Cole, Fredric Toben, Ernest Zundel, all were there in Krema 1 which was the picture on the right, so are all of them wrong too? If I am wrong I will have to start correcting my next videos. I personally don’t think I’m wrong….
    This might not be important to you but it is to me because I don’t want to be saying the wrong thing and since I was never there I have to rely on people that were. I think the readers here would also like to get the right answer to what the pictures are.

    Just sayin

    JR

    Comment by Jim Rizoli — March 1, 2017 @ 9:21 am

    • You wrote: “I still believe you have a mix up of the pictures of Dachau and Krema 1. IMO Krema 1 is the picture on the right taken in Auschwitz 1”

      I have checked the photos again. The photo on the right was taken at Dachau. This photo is shown on many other websites, where it is identified as a photo taken at Dachau. I have been to Dachau several times, so I recognize places that I have seen.

      Comment by furtherglory — March 1, 2017 @ 10:12 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: