Scrapbookpages Blog

July 13, 2017

New German law against “hate speech” & “Holocaust denial”

Filed under: Germany, Uncategorized — furtherglory @ 12:35 pm

Be careful about what you write about Jews on Facebook and other social media.

Read this news article to find out what will happen if you write something bad about Jews :

The following quote is from the news article:

Begin quote

BERLIN (JTA) — The German parliament passed a new law Friday designed to curb hate speech and libel on social networks.

The law requires Internet platforms like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to remove material with obviously illegal content and fake defamatory “news” within 24 hours of its having been reported. Previously, illegal material was reported but did not have to be removed.

The new law places the onus on the social media platforms to remove the material or be subjected to heavy fines, reportedly of up to about $56 million.

Josef Schuster, head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, praised the new network law as a strong instrument against online hate speech, and added that an evaluation period would help determine its efficacy.

Read more:

Just remember: Jews good — Germans bad — that’s all you need to know.

The Jews are now back in Germany, so watch out!


  1. Help me out here please. Where do denial and hate fit together? Why do they speak of it in the same sentence ? Racism isn’t even hate. May lead to it with some folks,but it ain’t hate. You want hate? Look to the AB’s. Look to “Dynamite Bob (Chambliss)” of the “old Klan”( I say old,cause they’ve mellowed. AB’s on the other hand. They think it’s their duty to kill a darkie,Jew,chinaman,or any other minority for that matter). That one person and one group are the proverbial “textbook definition” of hate.

    Comment by Tim — July 13, 2017 @ 7:13 pm

    • The Jew media keeps using the word hate with Holocaust denial to keep people using the terms interchangeably as a pavonian reflex.
      So they don’t even have to think about it when they hear the term Holocaust Denial they automatically associate it with hate this is just a propaganda tool for the Zionist Jews.
      When World War 1 happened and even into World War II the propagandists the British Americans French etc used terminologies to demonize the Germans saying all sorts of bad things about them when it wasn’t true so when the people in the United States hear the word German they automatically associated Germans with cutting off the hands of Belgians and making them into soap, bayoneting babies, and doing all types of bad things to them. You don’t have to even be a bad person in life to get branded as bad as long as the language that’s used is derogatory about you it will stick with you for the rest of your life whether your that way or not.


      Comment by Jim Rizoli — July 13, 2017 @ 7:35 pm

      • The Jew media keeps using the word hate with Holocaust denial to keep people using the terms interchangeably as a pavonian reflex.

        In Germany there is a very specific reason that ‘Holocaust denial’ is designated ‘hate’ — there is a law against ‘inciting racial hatred’ (Volksverhetzung — most countries in Europe have similar laws), but no specific law against ‘Holocaust denial’ — so they just say that denying the ‘Holocaust’ is inciting hatred of Jews, and prosecute ‘deniers’ under the Volksverhetzung law — using a similar judicial slight of hand, they currently prosecute old people who were somehow employed in KZs (eg as accountants or radio operators) for accessory to murder by officially declaring the KZ was a ‘death camp’, and just having been there means you were an accessory — they do not have to prove anything — eg that the person was involved in the killings, or even knew anything about it.

        Comment by eah — July 14, 2017 @ 8:08 am

    • Tim wrote: “Where do denial and hate fit together?”

      Would most Americans consent to a limitation of free speech (if not yet by law, at least by politically-correct self-censorship and media blackout) for any other excuse than a ban on hate speech?

      Preservation of the illusion of free speech.

      I remember hearing the ‘French’ historian George Bensoussan justify the Gayssot Law by claiming: “The anti-Semites no longer say ‘The Jews must die,’ but now they say ‘The Jews didn’t die.'” What a gang of crooks !!

      Comment by hermie — July 14, 2017 @ 4:06 am

      • Perhaps Bernie Farber of the Canadian Jewish Congress can help answer your question, Tim…

        22 years ago (!!), Mr. Farber was already claiming that ‘Holocaust denial’ was the new face of anti-Semitism. And he asserted that “outright anti-Semitism has become unfashionable, so deniers often resort to other tactics [such as ‘Holocaust denial’]” in order to promote hatred against Jews. An odd tactic if I’m asked. One could think that the best tactic to promote ‘hatred’ (I’d rather say resistance) against Jews is the exposure of their misdeeds and sinister plans. But no ! , Jewish supremacists claim, rather opted for the denial of the alleged murder of 6 million of them during WW2, probably in order to make anti-Semitism fashionable again, I guess. Bernie Farber also explained why Holohoax defenders flee any debate with ‘Holocaust deniers’ so obstinately. They do that because the former fear that a debate with the latter suggests “there are two sides to the Holocaust story,” not because they find there is no point in doing it as Holohoax defenders often deceptively claim these days.

        Comment by hermie — July 16, 2017 @ 3:28 pm

        • Denial equals”a statement that something is untrue”. Okay. Anti-semitism equals”prejudice or hostility towards the Jews “. I got both definitions from the dictionary. Where do either on of them have any relation to the other? It’s still not making good sense. If I were to say slavery never happened,does that mean I’m hostile towards the darkies? Well then again were stuck trying to figure out “Jew logic” . That shit would even melt Mr. Spock’s brain. This is off topic but it speaks to how snotty Jews are. Watch the movie “independence day”. Judd Hirsch is in it. In one part of the movie he’s praying with a group of people (as the aliens are attacking us) and a guy walks up to the group. The character Judd Hirsch plays,invites the man to pray with them. The mans character says,” I’m not Jewish “. The Judd Hirsch character replies,”that’s okay. No ones perfect”. How many Jews wrote that script? They wonder why we have a shit attitude towards them.

          Comment by Tim — July 22, 2017 @ 2:54 pm

          • You wrote: “The character Judd Hirsch plays,invites the man to pray with them. The mans character says,” I’m not Jewish “. The Judd Hirsch character replies,”that’s okay. No ones perfect”. How many Jews wrote that script? They wonder why we have a shit attitude towards them.”

            Most movie scripts are written by Jews. In today’s movies, there is never anything good about Germans, except maybe German Jews.

            Comment by furtherglory — July 22, 2017 @ 3:01 pm

            • My question is,”how many Jews worked the Tom Cruise movie,about the plot to bump Hitler off”. Furthermore,I’d like to know who paid for the memorial to Staffenburg and his back stabbers. Make a memorial to people guilty of treason. I’m guessing it was the Hebs. Then again treason would be fine by them,so long as they benefit. They can stack Goring’s fat ass next those previously mentioned idiots. He’s a traitor too. I gotta tip my hat to Gobbels. From what I’ve read,Hitler told Gobbels to take his family and haul ass. Gobbels ignored that order. He was loyal to Hitler to the end. He bumped himself and his family off. That sounds cruel,but think how the douchebag ruskies would’ve treated his wife and children if they got ahold of them. There was probably more than a few Pedophiles in the Russian army,that would’ve had a field day with those children

              Comment by Tim — July 22, 2017 @ 3:33 pm

        • I’ve sent out two invitations to my local Jewish Temple for a debate on the Holocaust so far nothing.
          Like the article says they won’t debate me and the real reason is I will bury them,expose,and embarrass them.
          Imagine asking them to show me how the ZB pellets worked in a room 2000 sq ft with 2-3000 people in it.

          How would the ZB gas get to all the people in the room and kill them in 15 minutes or less.
          You need at least 9 sq ft of open space around each person to keep the gas moving and some sort of fans and heaters to help it along so it would be ingested properly. Then how do you get all those people put of the room with only one small exit door?

          Then getting them brought upstairs in Krema 2 + 3 the skimpy rope elevator could only hold 600 lbs or 4 or 5 bodies at a time. On the second floor comes the 15 crematory that could only cremate each one, one body an hr….so say 20 hrs of operation around 300 bodies could be cremated, this whole operation would take at least a week or two just for one mass killing and cremation. So in the mean time what happens to the rest of the people in the camp? Some said upward to 25,000 were killed EVERY day.

          I think the debate would end right there because I would be accused of being a hateful anti-semite
          who was saying less Jews died. Since when is believing less deaths is a BAD thing? Not to the Jews, the more the better.

          Time to learn the truth



          Comment by Jim Rizoli — July 22, 2017 @ 5:15 pm

          • Hey FG had an article on her one time about how fast they could waste Jews . The article said they could drop 2,000 an hour. That’s unloading them,tagging them,shaving them and finally running them through the gas hut. Damn ! Those people would make damn good CEOs for American companies. Being that efficient,we’d be on top in no time. Wetbacks wouldn’t want to come over here anymore. They’d actually have to work.

            Comment by Tim — July 22, 2017 @ 7:59 pm

          • Jimbo. You’re beneath them. That’s the reason they don’t want to mix with you. You’re not a Jew,so you’re not perfect. Oh yeah. You don’t know how to piss and shit on the floor,like the Jews did that Gen. Patton ran across. Let me ask you a question. Did you see “the last days of Patton”? George C. Scott played Patton again. One part in the movie he drove up to inspect a German POW camp. He blew up cause they looked like shit. He told them next time he showed up they better look like soldiers. He didn’t try to make them feel like shit,because they were on the losing side. He was trying to instill in them they were men and soldiers and they better act like it. Did that really happen?

            Comment by Tim — July 22, 2017 @ 8:12 pm

  2. obviously illegal content

    “LOL” — it’s just whatever they don’t like — there is no objective standard — has been censored by both Germany (more often) and France for some weeks now — instead of a tweet you just see a message that says ‘So-and-so’s account has been withheld in: Germany’ or (less often) ‘So-and-so’s account has been withheld in: Germany and France’ — if you use a US proxy to view the account you are left scratching your head, wondering what is so offensive/hateful that Germans should not be allowed to view it — eg @whitereddit is blocked in Germany — anyone outside Germany: tell me what is so hateful and offensive about this account?

    Comment by eah — July 13, 2017 @ 1:06 pm

    • Eah wrote: “eg @whitereddit is blocked in Germany — anyone outside Germany: tell me what is so hateful and offensive about this account?”

      White identity, opposition to mass immigration, acknowledgment of racial differences, criticism and rejection of White racial suicide, and so on. All things that are not only very offensive to the current ‘morality’ (Globalist diktats) but also seriously illegal in Germany, France and most European countries (including the country where I live). Abominable thought crimes deserving the most severe punishment with the enthusiastic approval of the fanaticized and lobotomized masses. No forum for dissidents (in accordance with the democratic principle of “no freedom for the enemies of freedom”) ! Globalist dissolution über Alles !! Judicial lynching and social death to all heretics ! General tacit agreement in continental Europe (at least in Western & Central Europe)…

      Comment by hermie — July 13, 2017 @ 3:33 pm

      • People in Germany are reading my blog, according to statistics given to me. How do you explain this? My blog is nothing but Holocaust denial.

        Comment by furtherglory — July 13, 2017 @ 4:39 pm

        • How do you explain this?

          Up til now you mean — with this new law, the German government could, in theory, threaten the company whose server hosts your content with a large fine if this company does not block users in Germany from accessing your content.

          Comment by eah — July 13, 2017 @ 5:25 pm

  3. I wonder how our resident HoloHuxsters feel about all of this. Strong arming the internet companies to accept their HoloHoax. You mean you have to make laws to make it illegal to question the Holohoax, and if you do it is considered hate, ya right! So who determines what the truth is? You say that the Holocaust happened yet they Jews want to make sure the topic is non debatable. For our resident HoloHuxsters….the Holohoax is a scam always has been and the Jews are scurrying like crazy because sites like this are exposing the lie, and there is nothing that can be done about it sort of shutting down the internet. If you HoloHuxsters only understood how you’re being manipulated in this scam.
    But for whatever reason, pride, gullibility, or plain stupidity, you have been so brainwashed you can’t see the forest because of the trees.


    Comment by Jim Rizoli — July 13, 2017 @ 1:00 pm

    • accept their HoloHoax

      It isn’t just the ‘Holocaust’ — that is by far the smallest share of content they want to block — besides, ‘Holocaust denial’ is already illegal in Germany — they do not need a new law for that — if they saw a German posting ‘Holocaust denial’ material, and could verify his identity, they could just go arrest him and charge him under existing ‘inciting racial hatred’ laws — this law expands offensive speech to basically anything the government says is offensive, and then allows the government to fine companies that do not comply with a request to remove the content.

      As I suggested before: content hosts like and should call the German government’s bluff and just block their entire sites in Germany — this includes without a doubt millions of and accounts created and maintained by individuals and businesses — I think there would be such an outcry that the German government would back down — but and are run by fags — they do not have the guts to do that — a shame really as that would be tons of fun to see.

      Comment by eah — July 13, 2017 @ 1:19 pm

      • You wrote: “ and are run by fags”

        How do you know this?

        Comment by furtherglory — July 13, 2017 @ 4:35 pm

        • As a word “fag” is 1) a derogatory, vulgar name for a gay man (the literal meaning), or 2) an insult directed at a man who is not actually homosexual but is a pathetic wimp with no moral or physical courage (a more a figurative use) or just plain otherwise despicable; here moral courage is meant — I used “fag” in the latter sense — personally I have nothing against homosexuals of either gender per se, and I rarely if ever call male homosexuals fags (or lesbians dykes, for that matter) — they just cannot get married or adopt kids — or in a sane world they should not be able to.

          Comment by eah — July 14, 2017 @ 12:18 pm

          • Fag is also a smoke . A faggot,is a bundle of sticks. However it is spelled fagot. Fag is a cigarette in Australia or Britain .

            Comment by Tim — July 14, 2017 @ 8:55 pm

            • Yes, you are right — but I would say was — because nowadays I don’t think many people would say fag instead of eg smoke — fag has more or less only one meaning today, and as a word is verboten — gay also means happy/carefree, but is never really used that way anymore — The Gay Divorcee.

              Comment by eah — July 15, 2017 @ 1:12 am

              • Well nobody uses words in their exact textbook definition anymore. If I’m in a very upbeat mood,I can tell people I’m “gay”. They’ll think I’m a homosexual . I don’t know when or why,they decided to use fag to describe someone.

                Comment by Tim — July 15, 2017 @ 2:43 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: