Scrapbookpages Blog

August 13, 2017

Let’s get back to 911 and study what really happened that day

Filed under: True Crime, Trump — furtherglory @ 12:31 pm

President Trump has mentioned the 9/11 attack on America in several recent speeches. I think that he is misinformed in what he says about the 911 attack. There is no evidence that this was an attack by a foreign government.

The owner of the buildings brought them down, so that he could use the space for one huge tower. One of the towers that came down was not even hit. Building 7 had been wired to come down, and it did.

I have written several blog posts about the 9/11 attack, including this one:

https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2011/09/22/911-memorial-ceremonies/

My blog post about Barbara Olsen is also about the 9/11 attack:

https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/barbara-olson-a-victim-of-the-911-terrorist-attack/

This blog post is about an interview with Ward Churchill:

https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2014/09/09/megyn-kellys-interview-with-ward-churchill-on-fox-news/

This blog post, which continues the story of Ward Churchill, has lots of links which add to the story:

https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2014/09/11/2nd-part-of-megyn-kellys-interview-with-ward-churchill/

This news article claims that Jews did not stay home on 9/11 and that there were several Jews who died in the attack:

http://www.nowtheendbegins.com/pages/israel/were-4000-jews-told-to-stay-home-on-911.htm

The usual story is that 3,000 Jews stayed home that day, but the news article, cited above, claims that there were 4,000 Jews who worked there and some of them were killed that day.

Fortunately, there have been no more attacks. Thank God for that — there were 3,000 people killed that day, according to TV ads that we are seeing today.

23 Comments »

  1. Jew D. Wood is a raving lunatic ….. listen to her:

    Comment by Sockpuppet2012 — August 13, 2017 @ 5:59 pm

    • Actually I’m a little more tolerant of people than you.
      As it is with the HoloHoax topic people are stuck in their ways and won’t budge.
      I listen to ALL sides and see what explanation lines up with the facts.
      The problem I have with the 911 folks is their non acceptance of Judy Wood….
      Why are they so opposed to her? She has an opinion just like everyone else does….give her her time let her “rant” and move on. The 911 diehards want to exclude her from their little click.
      That is what bothers me about them, they do what the Jews do to us Revisionist, they marginalize us and push us aside. So in all honesty I feel the 911 movement has been hijacked by the Jews. They seem to get into all the groups this is why they are so powerful, they have infiltrators everywhere.
      You will notice that all the groups the Jews hijack are vehemently against the Holocaust revisionists, that should tell you something. The only site that hasn’t been hijacked by the Jews is FG site here.
      Thats why I’m still here. Once a site gets hijacked by the Jews I’m done with them and move on.
      Remember…with the Jews you lose….

      Jim Rizoli

      Comment by Jim Rizoli — August 13, 2017 @ 8:35 pm

      • Jim Rizoli said:

        “Actually I’m a little more tolerant of people than you”

        I’m glad to hear that.
        In that caes you will surely do like I did ten years ago, and “look at the other side”.

        Here you go, Jim ….. here is a link where you can download a refutation by a PhD Physicist of Judy Woods “Directed Energy Weapons”.

        It shows the utter impossibility and contradictions of her “theory

        http://www.visibility911.org/pdf-the-overwhelming-implausibility-of-using-directed-energy-beams-to-demolish-the-world-trade-center-towers/

        “As it is with the HoloHoax topic people are stuck in their ways and won’t budge
        I listen to ALL sides and see what explanation lines up with the facts”

        Ok, click on that link that I just posted that tells the “other side” and let me know if you agree with it or not, or what parts you agree or disagree with.

        Thank you!

        Comment by Sockpuppet2012 — August 14, 2017 @ 12:05 am

        • I appreciate the link I will look into it but the biggest thing that bothers me about this is the 911 people is the fact that they’re not tolerant of points that go directly against what they have to say and what they do to try to stop them. Again they are no different than the Jews fight the revisionist. Even if Judy Woods is wrong she shouldn’t be treated like she’s being treated. She has the right to her viewpoint.
          When it comes to all these type of topics there shouldn’t be you have to believe my way or no way.
          We might never ever find out what truly happened with 911 but what we do know is something happened that wasn’t natural and someone was involved in this and after all these years we still don’t know. It’s just like the Kennedy assassination we know what happened we just don’t know what happened.

          JR

          Comment by Jim Rizoli — August 14, 2017 @ 6:15 am

      • Jim Rizoli said:

        “The problem I have with the 911 folks is their non acceptance of Judy Wood”

        What “911 folks” are you talking about? ….. can you give me some names?

        And why do you have a problem with people who don’t accept Judy Wood’s “work”?

        Do you also have a problem with people who don’t accept the official conspiracy theory of Muslim hijackers?

        “Why are they so opposed to her?”

        If you would have looked at both sides of the issue like I did ten years ago, you wouldn’t be asking that question in 2017.

        That’s like asking “why are people so opposed to Deborah Lipstadt?”

        Only a person who never read Revisionist works would ask that question.

        “She has an opinion just like everyone else does….give her her time let her ”rant” and move on”

        That’s not how the scientific method and the search for truth works.

        The proper thing to do is to bring the opposing hypotheses into the light of day and see how they hold up to science, nature and reason.

        Do you think Rudolf, Graf and Mattogno should just pack up and “move on” and leave the Hoaxers alone?

        “The 911 diehards want to exclude her from their little click”

        Can you name some of these people?

        Why do Rudolf, Graf and Mattogno want to exclude Lipstadt, van Pelt and Hilberg from their little clique?

        “That is what bothers me about them, they do what the Jews do to us Revisionist, they marginalize us and push us aside”

        Nosense! ….. a lot of people have shown the falsehood and deception of Judy Wood’s “theories”, and Judy Wood tries to shut them up by filing copyright claims against their videos, instead of trying to answer them; here’s an example of that:

        “So in all honesty I feel the 911 movement has been hijacked by the Jews. They seem to get into all the groups this is why they are so powerful, they have infiltrators everywhere”

        That’s right, and Judy Wood is one of the Jewish infiltrators.

        If Judy Wood is right about her “Space Beams”, then Richard Gage and 2,800 Architects and Engineers are wrong and discredited.

        If Judy Wood is right, then Professor Steven Jones and Niels Harrit are wrong about the Nano-Thermite, and discredited as crackpots or willful deceivers.

        If Judy Wood is right, the whole 9-11 Truth movement is wrong and useless.

        If Judy Wood is right, Christopher Bollyn’s proof that 9-11 was done by Israel and dual-citizen American Jews is a worthless pile of rubbish.

        If Judy Wood is right, the Jews are all all exonerated.

        The “Space Beams” could have been operated by a couple of mad scientists…..

        Dick Cheyny and his nephew could have pulled it off while eating a pizza.

        Olama been sodden could have done it from his cave in Afghanistan.

        It could have been done by space aliens ….. as a matter of fact, if the Towers were destroyed by secret Directed Energy Space Beam weapons, then the “nazis” are certainly the prime suspects.

        Comment by Sockpuppet2012 — August 14, 2017 @ 12:27 am

  2. I got a better one. Do you think everyone knew the Nips were gonna bomb Pearl?

    Comment by Tim — August 13, 2017 @ 5:11 pm

  3. Here is a video presenting the evidence for controlled demolition:

    Comment by Sockpuppet2012 — August 13, 2017 @ 4:45 pm

  4. Read
    http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/08/31/are-you-a-mind-controlled-cia-stooge-paul-craig-roberts/
    WTC7 was inhabited by CIA, FBI etc., Danish Professor Noels Harrit and his team found Nano thermite in the dust of WTC7 debris.
    Furtherglory, according to the late prime minister of Italy and later president Francesco Cossiga: “All intel agencies in the world know that the Mossad and the CIA did 91”.
    Corriere della Sierra, 2007

    Case closed, furtherglory, there were Mossad agents caught, who were sent home by judge and orthodox Jew the Rabbi Michael Chertoff, later head of DHS
    https://www.youtube.com/results?q=911+nypd+radio+transmission+Mossad+mural+van

    WTC7 brought down by controlled demolition, Jim, but you are in doubt because you didn’t see any cable with plastic cover of a bright color?!?!
    How about cables with grey insulation, doesn’t those cables carry current? 🙂

    How can you think, that a non-state actor can pull this off? Synchronizing dropping a passport in the debris, setting off the media to march in concert, shipping off the steel, covering up, controlling the investigation, controlling NIST. U mad bro?..

    I cannot believe I read you guys comments, Jim and Futherglory, but there is a scientific explanation for your writings.

    This is what happens when you are exposed to chock or when your brain recalls memories of chock – the IQ drops steeply.

    The trick to brainwash people to a stupid belief system, or to reverse it to wake people up from brainwash, starts with a chock, then your plant your story or you try to help the person reason logically.
    Learn from the Jews:
    1. Picture of tyfus strucken corpses -> Jewish-american psy op units: “They were gassed”
    2. Skyscrapers coming down -> Ehud Barak prime minister of Israel : “Bin Laden,….. society will be different now”

    Comment by Lasse Karagiannis (@Amalek_) — August 13, 2017 @ 4:28 pm

    • Quote…
      “WTC7 brought down by controlled demolition, Jim, but you are in doubt because you didn’t see any cable with plastic cover of a bright color?!?!
      How about cables with grey insulation, doesn’t those cables carry current?”

      First of all I’m not in “no doubt” something brought the building down just not sure what.
      Dr Judy Wood feels that some sort of “directed energy field” was used….her explanation just as credible as anyone’s elses.
      Drjudywood.com

      I guess you might want to look into how they blow up buildings today. I’ve only seen the florescent colors which are easy to see for the technicians installing them.
      Grey cable that carry current? Ok did they find miles of “grey cables”? And where did the current come from to control them?
      I don’t care what color the cables were the question is did they find any? Show me proof of items relating to controlled demolition, the wires controlling them would be the logical first item.

      JR

      Comment by Jim Rizoli — August 13, 2017 @ 4:51 pm

      • Jim Rizoli wrote: “I guess you might want to look into how they blow up buildings today. ”

        After 9/11, one could assume that they just set fire to the upper floors, quietly go out, and then patiently wait for the vertical collapse of the building they’re bringing down, with a cup of coffee in their hand. 😉

        Why the need for engineers and technicians, and the waste of time, money and energy, when/if a big fire in the upper floors can do the job as well?

        Comment by hermie — August 13, 2017 @ 8:42 pm

  5. 2,800 Architects and Engineers recognize the destruction of Building 7 and the Twin Towers as controlled demolitions and are calling for a real investigation of the crime.

    What happened at the WTC can be found at:

    http://www.ae911truth.org/news/evidence.html

    Comment by Sockpuppet2012 — August 13, 2017 @ 4:21 pm

  6. Wrong link in my previous comment; here is the correct link:

    http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book/

    Comment by Sockpuppet2012 — August 13, 2017 @ 4:16 pm

  7. Jews did 9-11 and blamed it on Muslims so they could get American kids to fight and die in their genocidal wars of expansion. They were trying to do a false flag since the 1970’s.

    9-11 was planned years in advance.

    http://www.bollyn.com/assad-terrorists-are-fighting-for-israel/

    Comment by Sockpuppet2012 — August 13, 2017 @ 4:14 pm

  8. I haven’t really made the 911 issue a big issue with me because there are plenty of people dealing with it.
    My problem with the demolition theory is…..Was the building wired physically for demolition? If it was then there would of been miles of brightly colored wire mixed in with all the debris. It’s usually brightly colored so you can’t miss it.
    If not hard wired was it WI-FI wired so the bombs were detonated off site? That would sure take some doing but could of been done, I really don’t know.
    If someone can give me an answer to these questions that would be a big help.

    I definitely don’t agree with the official story.
    My expertise is the Holohoax and find that there are not many qualified people in that field so that’s where I put my time and energy.
    And think about it….the Holohoax topic is banned in 24 or so countries, while most 911 people and other conspiracy theorist people still believe in the Holohoax I would think. There are definitely more people who have written about 911 and the other topics. Lets see them take the Holohoax topic on…….I doubt it.
    Believe it or not Ernst Zundel was into the 911 topic and thats the reason why they came after him in the beginning. Then it morphed into the Holohoax.
    If you want to listen to a great interview with Jim Fetzer and Ernst Zundel in 2012 here it is….Ernst talks about the 911 topic here towards the end.
    I believe this was Ernst’s last interview unless someone has another one for me to listen to.

    https://jrizoli.wordpress.com/2017/08/10/ernst-zundel-interview-with-jim-fetzer/

    Jim Rizoli
    jrizoli.wordpress.com
    CCFIILE.COM

    Comment by Jim Rizoli — August 13, 2017 @ 1:42 pm

    • I have written several blog posts about 9-11, including this one: https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2011/09/22/911-memorial-ceremonies/

      Comment by furtherglory — August 13, 2017 @ 3:19 pm

    • Jim Rizoli said:

      “If not hard wired was it WI-FI wired so the bombs were detonated off site? That would sure take some doing but could of been done, I really don’t know.
      If someone can give me an answer to these questions that would be a big help”

      It had to have been done with radio activated detonation devices.

      Not only would it not have taken “some doing”…..it would have been a hundred times quicker and easier than installing a few hundred miles of det cord.

      The demolitions were computer programmed to start at the floors where the planes struck.

      The reason no plane hit Building 7 is because flight 93 was destined for Building 7, but it was shot down over Shanksville, Pennsylvania by a Canadian Air Force pilot who didn’t know that the plan was to let the plane go.

      So, Building 7, a steel framed building, came down at free fall acceleration, into its own footprint, simply due to a couple of small office fires…..IMPOSSIBLE!

      Comment by Sockpuppet2012 — August 13, 2017 @ 5:21 pm

      • By far the most important/to date completely unexplained event on 9/11: the absolutely symmetrical collapse of WTC-7.

        Also, I’ll say that while (ostensibly) struck by airliners, the collapse of the towers generated a LOT of dust — a demolition is also a kind of collapse — a demolition normally generates a significant amount of dust only when the building being destroyed hits the ground — the towers clearly generated tremendous amounts of dust during their collapse — the clouds of dust surrounding them were ENORMOUS — where did all that dust come from? — of course some people say it came from explosive charges pulverizing concrete.

        Comment by eah — August 15, 2017 @ 3:48 am

        • The point about where did all the dust come from. Concrete cannot turn to dust they has to be some force exerted on it to crush it into those fine particles demolition would not do that what would do that? Dr Judy Wood explains it she calls it dustification the process that she thinks was used to bring those buildings down actually dissolve the building to dust so that’s what we’re dealing with here and that’s what I’m wrestling with because again in a explosion sure you get a lot of dust but the building does not turn to dust on the way down there’s a big difference. There was nothing left to this building at all maybe ten or twenty feet of rubble in a building that that was 110 story’s high makes no sense. So the question is where did the building go it dissolve the right in front of our eyes and when you look at all those pictures of those clouds of dust then you can understand there was something more to it than just demolition this is just my opinion I can’t prove any of this but I’m looking for another answer that explains how concrete can dissolve. By the way if you look at the original picture of the building coming down you will notice the antenna on the top of the building dissolving right in front of your eyes how does an explosion dissolve a mast on top of the building?
          And if that was the last thing that came down why isn’t it in the rubble it was on the top of the roof it should have been on the top of the pile but wasn’t it dissolved. Instead of dismissing Dr Judy would you might want to read at least what she says and how she shows some pretty weird things that happen there.

          JR

          Comment by Jim Rizoli — August 15, 2017 @ 6:30 am

          • demolition would not do that

            You are wrong — modern high explosives can certainly pulverize concrete — by pulverize I mean turn a substantial part of its mass into very small particles (akin to gravel) and dust — and if you use enough high explosive, and place it correctly, you can pulverize a large mass of concrete — the huge billowing clouds generated by the collapse of the towers are amazing.

            A video showing the effect of a small amount of high explosive on concrete blocks.

            Comment by eah — August 15, 2017 @ 8:06 am

            • Nano-Thermite could easily be hundreds of times more powerful than conventional explosives, such as Dynamite.

              Jonathan Cole did some experiments in his back yard with Thermite that he made himself, that replicated a lot of what happened to the steel on 9-11 and debunking National Geographic:

              Comment by Sockpuppet2012 — August 15, 2017 @ 10:00 am

          • 9-11 Research — Concrete Pulverization — Twin Towers’ Concrete Turned to Dust in Mid-Air

            Comment by eah — August 15, 2017 @ 8:09 am

            • Not only was 220 acres of lightweight concrete pulverized; an incredible amount of Drywall (gypsum wallboard) was also pulverized.

              Comment by Sockpuppet2012 — August 15, 2017 @ 10:05 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: