Scrapbookpages Blog

September 11, 2017

Today is the anniversary of the attack by a foreign government on the buildings owned by one man

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: — furtherglory @ 7:58 am

It was the strangest thing that has ever happened in America. The buildings owned by one man, and only the buildings owned by this one man, were hit by airplanes that were sent by a foreign government.

The man, who owned all of these buildings that were hit, did not go to his office in one of these buildings that day because his wife reminded him that he had a dental appointment that morning.

I have written extensively about 9-11 in the past. You can read my previous blog posts at https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2016/09/10/memories-of-9-11/

14 Comments »

  1. Comment by hermie — September 26, 2017 @ 4:09 am

  2. Comment by hermie — September 15, 2017 @ 7:28 pm

  3. Comment by eah — September 12, 2017 @ 10:10 am

  4. Comment by hermie — September 12, 2017 @ 3:41 am

  5. Comment by eah — September 11, 2017 @ 8:17 pm

  6. Something for you:

    Comment by eah — September 11, 2017 @ 2:37 pm

  7. only the buildings owned by this one man

    In NYC — the Pentagon was also hit.

    a foreign government

    Ostensibly Al-Qaeda was responsible — not many would call them a “government” — nearly all the alleged hijackers were Saudi Nationals.

    Comment by eah — September 11, 2017 @ 1:17 pm

  8. I solved this last year:

    Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — September 11, 2017 @ 11:31 am

  9. Yes, how strange. I’m sure the Jews are responsible.

    Of course, I have no idea why Jews would want two other planes hijacked, including the Pentagon.

    But, I know how deniers and other antisemites believe Jews are the source of all evil so what does it matter?

    Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — September 11, 2017 @ 11:22 am

    • deniers and other antisemites

      Is someone who questions (‘denies’) the conventional ‘Holocaust’ story necessarily an ‘antisemite’?

      Comment by eah — September 12, 2017 @ 10:12 am

      • @eah:
        “Is someone who questions (‘denies’) the conventional ‘Holocaust’ story necessarily an ‘antisemite’?”

        Not necessarily. I know from looking into it that not all 9-11 “Truthers” deny the Holocaust but that’s how I found 9-11 “Truthers,” many deniers are also “Truthers.” The same with denial, one prominent denier I can think of, Bradley Smith, was not blatant antisemite.

        http://holocaustcontroversies.blogspot.com/2011/01/inconvenient-historys-joe-bishop-wants.html?m=1

        I can’t find the original article, the link is dead.

        Jett Rucker might be another.

        I found that some “Truthers” still claim that Jews/Mossad did it but do not deny the Holocaust. They do believe that Jews are “wire pullers.” They use language that I associate with antisemitism but any suggestion of denial drives them nuts.

        This is why I was careful to separate the two. I know a particular antisemite who claims not to be a “revisionist” but makes the same silly claims.

        Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — September 12, 2017 @ 12:45 pm

        • Not necessarily — then why did you write: deniers and other antisemites — is there any other way to interpret “and other” than that (all) “deniers” are also “antisemites”? — btw, I don’t give a fuck about your opinion — it just seemed like another possible opportunity to show what a stupid hypocrite you are — insipid, intellectually vacuous — and it worked like a charm.

          “LOL”

          Comment by eah — September 12, 2017 @ 10:55 pm

        • antisemites

          You’re intellectually vacuous because you repeat the same tired smears, eg ‘antisemite’, that nearly every media hack uses, and nearly all Jews use, to shutdown legitimate inquiry into the ‘Holocaust’ tale — kleiner Hinweis: calling someone an ‘antisemite’ is not an argument — it’s just name-calling.

          I was careful to separate the two

          “LOL” — not “careful” enough — in fact, you didn’t “separate” them at all: you made them equivalent via “and other” — but you are apparently too stupid to see that (what a surprise) — moron.

          Comment by eah — September 13, 2017 @ 3:25 am

          • I’m just going to include this as one comment, eah.

            eah the little bitch wrote:

            “eah on September 12, 2017 at 10:55 pm
            “Not necessarily — then why did you write: deniers and other antisemites — is there any other way to interpret “and other” than that (all) “deniers” are also “antisemites”?”

            The vast majority of deniers that I’ve seen are antisemites. I gave two examples out of all the deniers I’ve ever seen.

            Do you take medication for your OCD or do you just like to let your freak flag fly?

            ” — btw, I don’t give a fuck about your opinion —”

            Gee, you are hurting my feelings, Nancy. Did you write that in your diary next to your secret desires that you want Donald Trump to scream “You’re fired!!!!!” while he pumps you with his little hands?

            “it just seemed like another possible opportunity to show what a stupid hypocrite you are — insipid, intellectually vacuous”

            Aaaaaaawwwww, there you go hurting my feelings again with your words, Nancy. I can’t tell you how devastated I really am.

            😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

            “and it worked like a charm.”

            Bitch poodle, you basically piss all over yourself when you try history with me. You are just repeating goofy old denier canards that have been debunked for years.

            ““LOL””

            Wow, how devastating.

            You should try harder:

            eah the whiny bitch poodle said:

            “You’re intellectually vacuous because you repeat the same tired smears, eg ‘antisemite’, that nearly every media hack uses,”

            What, you didn’t feel like you explained yourself in your first comment? Or did your medication wear off?

            “and nearly all Jews use, to shutdown legitimate inquiry into the ‘Holocaust’ tale —”

            Deniers don’t show a legitimate desire to inquire into the Holocaust. They start with:

            It didn’t happen.

            They then go to ridiculous lengths to prove this. The Holocaust is a historical fact. I’ve never seen any denier actually provide proof of some sort of hoax, the main thing deniers do is bash witnesses and use junk science to prove that gas chambers didn’t or couldn’t work. This in spite of the fact that 70 + years have given us documents, collaborating witnesses, perpetrator and victim testimonies, site investigations and so forth.
            If deniers want to “prove” their history then they they need to provide facts. Who made up this hoax, when did meetings take place, where is the documentation, where are the witness statements that confirm their history, where is the proof of forgery? Most importantly, where is the documentation on where Jews wound up if the Nazis didn’t kill them?
            You do that and I’ll start to believe you.

            “calling someone an ‘antisemite’ is not an argument — it’s just name-calling.”

            When someone makes antisemitic statements I’m going to call them an antisemite. Most deniers I’ve seen make antisemitic comments. So, what else am I to conclude? That they don’t mean it?

            I was careful to separate the two

            “LOL”

            Dull, try this:

            “— not “careful” enough — in fact, you didn’t “separate” them at all: you made them equivalent via “and other” — ”

            Well, I came up with two examples, one is clear, one is iffy. I feel comfortable saying that most deniers are antisemites.

            “but you are apparently too stupid to see that (what a surprise) — moron.”

            Aaaaaaawwwww, there you go again, hurting my feelings.

            See, Nancy, I give a fuck all what you think. I thought I might answer you in a serious fashion, instead, you choose to take the chance to insult me. I’m fine with that, really, I think you are pathetic.

            So, dish it out, bitch.

            Normally I take this moment to invite deniers to come join us at Skeptics. We need new deniers, all of ours pissed themselves and ran off. So, even though I don’t think you can hack it I’ll extend that invitation to you:

            http://www.skepticforum.com/viewforum.php?f=39

            I think like all deniers I meet on YouTube, Twitter, forums and blogs you will refuse because you lack 🏀S. You might just surprise me, that would be nice.

            So, do. Or don’t. Either way I’ll still come here when I want.

            Comment by brycesdaddy1105 — September 13, 2017 @ 7:51 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: