Scrapbookpages Blog

July 6, 2013

Angelina Jolie had a double mastecomy to avoid breast cancer after discovering that she has Ashkenazi genes

Filed under: Germany, Health — Tags: , , , , — furtherglory @ 7:32 pm
Angelina Jolie and her mother, who died of breast cancer at a young age

Angelina Jolie’s mother (on the left)  died of breast cancer at a young age. Angelina is pictured on the right.

This quote is from a news article in the Jewish Journal, which you can read in full here:

Actress Angelina Jolie had a double mastectomy after discovering that she had the breast cancer gene common to Ashkenazi Jewish women.

Jolie wrote in an Op-Ed in The New York Times that she decided to have the surgery after being told she had the BRCA1 gene mutation and had an 87 percent chance of developing breast cancer.

Jolie’s mother died of cancer at a young age, and Jolie wrote that she wanted to reassure her six young children that she would not die young as well.

According to an article on Wikipedia,

“….at their peak in 1931, Ashkenazi Jews accounted for 92 percent of the world’s Jews. Today, they make up approximately 80 percent of Jews worldwide.[11] Most Jewish communities with extended histories in Europe are Ashkenazim, with the exception of those associated with the Mediterranean region. The majority of the Jews who migrated from Europe to other continents in the past two centuries are Ashkenazi Jews, Eastern Ashkenazim in particular.”

Wikipedia gives this information about the Khazar people who formerly lived in what is now Russia:

“The Khazars (Turkish: Hazarlar) were a semi-nomadicTurkic people who created one of the largest states of medieval Eurasia, Khazaria, with its capital at Atil. Astride one of the major arteries of commerce between northern Europe and southwestern Asia, Khazaria commanded the western marches of the Silk Road and played a key commercial role as a crossroad between China, the Middle East, and Europe.[4]

[…]

Beginning in the 8th century, the Khazar royalty and much of the aristocracy are reported to have converted to Judaism, though the populace remained multiconfessional and polyethnic.”

So any woman who is concerned about breast cancer should first determine if she has any Jewish ancestry and then determine if her Jewish genes are Ashkenazi genes or Khazar genes.

This Jewish website has the following information about Jewish genetic diseases:

A number of genetic disorders occur more frequently in certain ethnic populations. In the Ashkenazi Jewish population (those of Eastern European descent), it has been estimated that one in four individuals is a carrier of one of several genetic conditions. These diseases include Tay-Sachs Disease, Canavan, Niemann-Pick, Gaucher, Familial Dysautonomia, Bloom Syndrome, Fanconi anemia, Cystic Fibrosis and Mucolipidosis IV. Some of these diseases may be severe and may result in the early death of a child. Carrier screening is available for all of these diseases with a simple blood test.

Hitler has been heavily criticized for making the Nuremberg laws of 1935, which included “The Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor” which forbade marriage and sexual relations between Jews and Germans. Jews were also not allowed to employ female household staff under the age of 45.

This quote is from Wikipedia:

The Nuremberg Laws classified people with four German grandparents as “German or kindred blood”, while people were classified as Jews if they descended from three or four Jewish grandparents. A person with one or two Jewish grandparents was a Mischling, a crossbreed, of “mixed blood”.[1] These laws deprived Jews of German citizenship and prohibited marriage between Jews and other Germans.[2]

The Nuremberg Laws also included a ban on sexual intercourse between people defined as “Jews” and non-Jewish Germans and prevented “Jews” from participating in German civic life. These laws were both an attempt to return the Jews of 20th-century Germany to the position that Jews had held before their emancipation in the 19th century; although in the 19th century Jews could have evaded restrictions by converting, this was no longer possible.

The purpose of these German laws was to avoid the passing of Jewish genes on to ethnic Germans.  Hitler had learned that the Jews were noted for having many hereditary defects and diseases.

The famous Dr. Josef Mengele was doing research at Auschwitz to determine how hereditary defects are passed on.  His subjects were Jews and Gypsies.  Today, the results of his experiments are kept under lock and key in Israel.

50 Comments

  1. well well Brad Pitt had to marry into the tribe to stay on top in the box office.
    This explains why he tumbled from the brilliant 7 years in Tibet to the satanic evil Inglorious Bastards. Brad sold his genes to the tribe called quest.
    What a moron.
    FG how you nailed that perfect resume about the ashkenazi khazar warring merchant tribe in just a couple of lines, with no comments about but the trivial nazi word origin, show how you hit the nail. They are will always be khazars. Nothing else explains how 10 million “jews” ended up in Russia, nothing, but they are not jews but khazars.

    Comment by wolf — July 18, 2013 @ 4:32 pm

  2. You people are hilarious.

    Nazi and Ashkenazi are not related terms. Ashkenazi is a derivative of the word “Ashkenaz,” which is a Biblical name (Genesis 10:3). Post-Roman Jewry used the term to refer to Germany. Here’s a link to Strong’s Concordance on the word:

    http://www.blueletterbible.org/lang/lexicon/lexicon.cfm?Strongs=H813&t=KJV

    And no, it isn’t pronounced in German like “Nazi,” because, for one thing, it’s spelled differently in German: ashkenasisch.

    Moreover, Hitler himself uses the term “Nazi” in Hitlers Tischegespräche (see p. 293): “Der Fall kam dadurch auf, daß ein Nazi am Nürnberger Bahnhof entlangging und da einen Juden fluchend vorbeikommen hörte. Im Weitergehen sah er, wie der Jude einen Brief wütend in einen Briefkorb warf.”

    Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 11:54 am

    • Oh, and one more thing: Most Jewish genetic traits are autosomal recessive, which means that you have to have two parents with the same allele AND have both parents pass on that allele for a child to be affected.

      Example: My wife and I underwent genetic screening because she’s 100% Russian Jewish and I’m ethnically one-quarter German and Czech Jewish. She tested positive as a carrier for cystic fibrosis (which is also common among the Irish, we learned). Therefore, the odds of our having an affected child was ZERO. The odds of our having a child that was a carrier was only one in four.

      Science is hard!

      Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 12:18 pm

      • You also have that coin from Der Angriff that uses “Nazi” and Goebbels use of same.

        Bear in mind just how small the number of Jewish refugees from Germany was that ended up in the U.S. or in other English-speaking countries. Most American Jews are of Russian ancestry and wouldn’t necessary pronounce “Ashkenazi” like “Nazi.” Further, because they would be MORE familiar with the term “Ashkenazi,” it’s more likely that they would pronounce Nazi with a /z/ sound, rather than a /tz/ sound, because the letter in Hebrew is tzadhe and not zayin.

        Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 12:27 pm

      • Correction: “One in four” above should be “one in two.” One in two chance of parenting a carrier. Zero chance of parenting a child with the disease.

        Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 7:51 pm

    • In proper German, it is Aschkenasisch, but a Jewish German exile in America would read Ashkenazi like “Nazi” if he’d read the English version, and this has come up as being the source of the term Nazi: comming from German Jewish exiles in America.

      Furthermore, Hitler’s mentioning of Nazi in Tischgespräche describes a cussing Jew approaches a “Nazi”. Much like a hostile Black person approaching a “cracker”.

      Unless I see an official proclamation of the NSDAP to use Nazi as acronym for a Nationalsozialist, I am not convinced that this stems from NS Germans. Especially when the use of Nazi was said not to be used by an informal party leadership declaration, for what I heard that this was the case.

      Comment by Markus — July 10, 2013 @ 12:23 pm

      • You also have that coin from Der Angriff that uses “Nazi” and Goebbels use of same.
        Bear in mind just how small the number of Jewish refugees from Germany was that ended up in the U.S. or in other English-speaking countries. Most American Jews are of Russian ancestry and wouldn’t necessary pronounce “Ashkenazi” like “Nazi.” Further, because they would be MORE familiar with the term “Ashkenazi,” it’s more likely that they would pronounce Nazi with a /z/ sound, rather than a /tz/ sound, because the letter in Hebrew is tzadhe and not zayin.

        Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 12:27 pm

      • Also, “proper German” doesn’t capitalize adjectives, which you would know if you actually knew any German.

        Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 12:28 pm

  3. This is an admirable comment thread, with helpful information offered by nearly all commenters. Much appreciated.

    A fun note: hermie above has a quote saying “Nazi” was “popularized by ‘German’ exiles abroad.” I think the word German is in quotes to show that they were not actually Germans. They were jews. Jews are not Germans, not Americans, not Norwegians, etc.

    In response to the information given by the apparently sincere majority of commenters here and an extra bit I already knew, I will adjust my position on the insult term “Nazi.” But my policy will not change. That is, I will stick to the fact that in all of the speeches by Adolf Hitler, Joseph Goebbels, and a few others that I have read (which I skimmed in German and then translated using Google or found an English translation), the insult term does not appear. If Hitler chose not to say nor utter that term in public, WHY WOULD WE?

    Note to Carolyn: I agree that we don’t want jews to determine our language limitations. Jews have successfully and ubiquitously demonized the “N” term. But I submit that the unassailable reason for us not to use it is because Adolf Hitler didn’t use it in his books nor as the leader of Germany.

    Sincerely,
    James

    Comment by James of WWW — July 9, 2013 @ 6:49 pm

    • Well James, you now give me the opening to say that I read something from Hitler in which he called a person a Nazi while in conversation, although since I did not see the German original I can’t be sure that wasn’t the translator’s doing. I think it was a quote from Table Talk, but again can’t be sure. If I copied it and saved it, I don’t know where it is now. But I would like to find the time to go through Table Talk and see what is there in the way of “Nazi.

      Comment by Carolyn Yeager — July 9, 2013 @ 8:13 pm

  4. So where does the term Ashkenazim come from? I don’t believe what the Jews write about it … just on their say-so. It certainly has no relation to “Nazi,” which is a shortened form of National Sozialist. But it’s understandable that people come to believe that it does.

    Comment by Carolyn Yeager — July 6, 2013 @ 8:39 pm

    • Carolyn, you do a lot of good work, and some awful. An awful example: “Nazi.” It is not a “shortened form of National Sozialist.” (Eustace Mullins also said that later in his life, and he, too, was wrong.) Such a shortening would reasonably be “Naso.” Since the term originates with the jews, why not see it right there in Ashkenazi? Our enemy, jewry, is infamous for tarring others with what the jews, themselves, are. The great Germans of Hitler’s NSDAP never referred to themselves using that “N” word. (And Google’s translator inserts it where the original text says no such thing.) That term came from the jews. We shouldn’t use it in any way unless we also explain with each usage that it is a jew-invented insult against the great Germans of the White race.

      Sincerely,
      James Laffrey
      WhitesWillWinparty.org

      Comment by James of WWW — July 7, 2013 @ 4:58 am

      • I do not believe that the word Nazi originated with the word Ashkenazi. The term National Socialists is translated into German as Nationalsozialisten. The first two syllables of the German word are pronounced as “not zee.” I believe that the term Nazi originated with American journalists in Germany. I suspect that it was William L. Shirer, who was the first person to use the term in one of his news articles that he sent to America from Germany. I have several of his books and he used the term Nazi in his book “The Nightmare Years 1930 to 1940.” It was necessary to shorten the name of the German political party because Nationalsozialisten was too long to put into a newspaper headline. If the name had been shortened to “Nati,” Americans would not have known how to pronounce it. That is why I think that the term Nazi was coined by American journalists.

        I have never heard anyone say the word Ashkenazi, but I doubt that the last two syllables are pronounced the same as the word Nazi.

        Don’t ask me for a source. This is my own opinion about the way the word originated. It is very common in American Journalism to make up words and abbreviations to save space in a headline.

        Comment by furtherglory — July 7, 2013 @ 8:48 am

        • Furtherglory,

          in German pronounciation, “Ashkenazi” sounds exactly the same as “Nazi”.

          Ash-Ke-Not-Zee

          Comment by Markus — July 9, 2013 @ 1:41 pm

          • I asked a friend, who is very well educated, how to pronounce Ashkenazi. He thought that the word was spelled with an O, because he said it was pronounced Oshkenazi like Oshkosh, Wisconsin. He pronounced the “nazi” part of the word the same way that Americans pronounce the word Nazi.

            Comment by furtherglory — July 10, 2013 @ 7:44 am

        • Actually, it sounds more like Nu- tSee than Not-Zee for Nazi and
          Ush-Car-Nu -tSee or Ush-Kay-Nu -tSee for Ashkenazi in German.

          Comment by Markus — July 9, 2013 @ 1:49 pm

          • You’re talking out of your ass. You clearly don’t know either Hebrew or German, so why not stop commenting where you have no expertise? I can actually speak a little or both languages, and a far amount of Yiddish, which is quite close to German. So leave it to the adults, OK?

            Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 12:29 pm

            • Du ungehobelter Schnösel. Was bildest du dir ein, mich so zu beleidigen.

              Man will eine lehrreiche Diskussion führen, und dann kommst du mir in die Quere mit solch einer Kneipenschlägersprache.

              Nein danke, darauf kann ich verzichten.

              Comment by Markus — July 10, 2013 @ 1:04 pm

              • Well, someone learned to use Google Translate today!

                Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 1:41 pm

              • By the way, your declension on “solch” looks wrong.

                Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 1:43 pm

                • Apparently, it is you who uses google translate to keep up with the conversation.

                  And what’s wrong with solch in this context?

                  This is getting childish. Ad hominem attacks and projections of illiteracy of the German language is under my Niveau.

                  Comment by Markus — July 10, 2013 @ 2:49 pm

                • Following “mit” you’ve got to use a declension, depending on article — solche, solchen, or solcher. I’d say “solchen.”

                  Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 4:58 pm

            • Your guessing game is maybe entertaining to you, but a native speaker knows better.

              solch is descriptive. “Mit solcher” would be correct if the undefinitive article was dropped. I kept in the correct case “mit solch einer”, since it’s Femininum Dativ. Solchen doesn’t even apply in any Femininum case.

              (Why am I actually giving you a lesson? You are a rude person, who is more pretend than productive. Either German is your second language or you haven’t passed Hauptschule).

              Nice try though.

              Comment by Markus — July 10, 2013 @ 6:52 pm

              • There is no declension in the sense you used the word where “solch” would be correct, at least that I can see. Dative feminine case is “mit solchen einer… ”

                See: http://canoo.net/inflection/solch:A:Demonstr

                German is my fifth or sixth language. English, French, Spanish, Hebrew, Yiddish, then German.

                I’m willing to be corrected on this. Can you tell me why the declension above (mit solchen einer) is wrong?

                (Addition: Looking at several texts, I see both forms used. Is your version an elision of some sort?)

                Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 7:41 pm

            • Mit solchen is Plural. Mit solcher would be possible for Femininum, or solch einer. Solchen einer sounds like “I have not no money”.

              What this is called in linguistics might be a good way for you to study and cool off for today.

              I see no reason to be friendly with you all of a sudden. Your initial query might have been valid and needed clarification, but you lack all decency to start a conversation.

              Roger and out.

              Comment by Markus — July 10, 2013 @ 8:25 pm

              • it is solch and not solcher, mit goes with einer and solch is unaltered, just to put emphasis on the foul bartender language

                Comment by wolf — July 18, 2013 @ 4:23 pm

      • Well, James, you are not a good judge of my work. Gee, I just went to your site and what did I find – a ‘Donation Drive’ going on. You particularly don’t know anything about real National Socialists, so you quote from Eustace Mullins, an American. “Nazi” was not invented by the Jews, but used in a pejorative way by them. There is so much disinformation out there about this word, and everybody has their version of it!

        Ashkenaz is a Hebrew word. I have written about it some here: http://thewhitenetwork.com/2013/07/04/jewish-hot-beds-of-bolshevism-in-the-u-s-episode-54/#comments In case anyone cares to read it, and find fault with it. 🙂

        I know Austrians who were members of the Hitler Youth from 1936 on, and they tell me “Nazi” was commonly used by all the folk. I have it in writing too (but I’d have to hunt for it). These men later joined the Wehrmacht and served to the end of the war. I found an instance when Hitler used it in speaking informally, but since it was an English translation, I can’t be sure what he actually said. But I have it on good authority that “Nazi” was spoken and was not considered harmful or insulting, just the opposite.

        It’s true the the Party encouraged to always use National Socialist for dignity’s sake, and I agree ‘Nazi’ shouldn’t be used by officials or when officially speaking. But there are pro-NS people who use “Nazi” all the time, much more than I do. I usually say National Socialist, but in reading and quoting I use what the source does. However there is nothing wrong with the term ‘Nazi’ EXCEPT that the NS haters use it all the time, and only that. It is still weak, imo, to allow the Jews to determine our language, which is what you and all the others who talk like you are doing.

        To furtherglory: That Shirer was the first to use it journalistically in 1930 doesn’t mean that Jews invented it. It’s pretty impossible to pin that down.

        I really should take the time to research this word as well as I can and report my results.

        Comment by Carolyn Yeager — July 7, 2013 @ 5:29 pm

        • Shirer is very biased in his writing, but I didn’t know that he was Jewish. I changed the link to the link for the comments.

          Comment by furtherglory — July 7, 2013 @ 6:58 pm

        • Here’s just two examples of the term ‘Nazi’ being used in Goebbel’s Der Angriff in 1934:


          (I got these off a microfilm and have many more)

          Comment by The Black Rabbit of Inlé — July 9, 2013 @ 3:21 am

      • Germans do actually shorten terms so that they end in an “i”, whether or not that makes for a “reasonable” contraction, especially in informal speech. For instance “Studi” as an abbreviation of “Student”, Mutti — Mutter, Omi – Großmutter/Oma. In high school, just about every kid in my class had a nickname that ended in “i”.

        Comment by Lena — July 26, 2013 @ 10:51 am

        • How come you didn’t have the nickname Leni, short for Magnalene?

          Comment by furtherglory — July 26, 2013 @ 11:37 am

          • Because in my case, Lena refers to my grandma, who was Sorbian. My nickname in school was actually Quotensorbe (Token Sorbian).
            http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorbs

            Comment by Lena — September 4, 2013 @ 7:27 am

    • The term Ashkenazi[m] comes from the biblical character named Ashkenaz (a descendant of Noah).

      The term Nazi was invented and popularized abroad by jews – early opponents of National Socialism and ‘German’ exiles abroad.

      The 24th edition of Etymologisches Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache (2002) says the word “Nazi” was favored in southern Germany (supposedly from c.1924) among opponents of National Socialism because the nickname “Nazi” (from the masc. proper name Ignatz, Ger. form of Ignatius) was used colloquially to mean “a foolish person, clumsy or awkward person.” Ignatz was a popular name in Catholic Austria, and according to one source in WWI “Nazi” was a generic name in the German Empire for the soldiers of Austria-Hungary. “Nazi” was also meant to mirror the term “Sozi” (the name the German socialists were called when the word “Nazi” was attributed to NSDAP members).

      The NSDAP for a time attempted to adopt the Nazi designation as what the Germans call a “despite-word,” but they gave this up, and the NSDAP is said to have generally avoided the term. Before 1930, NSDAP members had been called in English “National Socialists”. According to the Oxford English Dictionary the first use of the word “Nazi” in English was by The Times newspaper on 19th September 1930. The use of “Nazi Germany”, “Nazi regime”, etc., was popularized by ‘German’ exiles abroad. From them, it spread into other languages, and eventually brought back to Germany, after the war. In the USSR, the terms “National Socialist” and “Nazi” were said to have been forbidden after 1932, presumably to avoid any taint to the good word “Socialist”. Soviet literature refers to fascists. (Online Etymology Dictionary)

      Comment by hermie — July 7, 2013 @ 10:00 am

      • You wrote: “According to the Oxford English Dictionary the first use of the word “Nazi” in English was by The Times newspaper on 19th September 1930.”

        Thank you for providing this information. I was just guessing when I wrote that the word Nazi was first promoted by American newspapers. William Shirer was an American journalist in German in 1930. I am guessing that he was the one who came up with the word Nazi. In those days, journalists were supposed to be unbiased, but Shirer was a biased journalist, ahead of his time.

        Comment by furtherglory — July 7, 2013 @ 11:23 am

        • For a word as “recent” as “Nazi,” the OED wouldn’t bother to identify the first usage — just a contemporaneous usage.

          Did all of you fail out of community college or what?

          Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 12:31 pm

      • Hermie, I think you took some of this from Metapedia (or Metapedia took it from your source) and Metapedia has only one source of information on their “Nazi” page: Don McCombs’ book “World War II: 4,139 strange and fascinating facts” published by Wings Books, 1994. Pretty weird.

        It makes much more sense, as Wikipedia and furtherglory both say, that

        “The shorthand Nazi was formed from the first two syllables of the German pronunciation of the word “national” (IPA: [na-tsi̯-oˈ-naːl]).”

        You wrote: “Nazi” was also meant to mirror the term “Sozi” (the name the German socialists [Marxists] were called when the word “Nazi” was attributed to NSDAP members).” I think this is right, that the Socialists [Marxists] were called Sozis. However, Joseph Goebbels wrote a pamphlet in 1931 titled “The Nazi-Sozi: Questions and Answers for National-Socialists.” He uses Nazi-Sozi as standing for National-Socialist [Nationalsozialismus] — the whole word.

        I think the Germans were responsible for these words and there is nothing “bad” about them. I have found them in use by Austrian National Socialists in 1938 and I’m still looking.

        Comment by Carolyn Yeager — July 7, 2013 @ 9:03 pm

  5. Yeah dying eyes blue and performing experiments on humans was all about just trying to make everyone a little better. Many different races have dealt with different diseases. You guys are twisted fucks!

    Comment by NeverAGAIN! — July 6, 2013 @ 7:46 pm

    • Do a search on Jewish genetic diseases and you get this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_genetics_of_Jewish_people

      Do a search on German genetic diseases and you will not find a Wikipedia entry. The closest thing that you will find is this website: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18348259

      I know that you are hung up on the superiority of Jews and your hatred of the German people, but you will have to admit that Jews have genetic diseases, while Germans do not have enough genetic diseases to warrant a Wikipedia page.

      Comment by furtherglory — July 6, 2013 @ 10:29 pm

    • You forgot the soap (made from jewish fat), gas chambers with diesel exhaust and lamp shades made from human (jewish) skin!

      Comment by April53 — July 7, 2013 @ 2:32 am

      • (this was meant to be a reply to “NeverAGAIN! — July 6, 2013 @ 7:46 pm”………)

        Comment by April53 — July 7, 2013 @ 2:34 am

    • Dying eyes blue. What a ridiculous propagandist you are, RidiculousAGAIN! Are you Irene Zisblatt’s brother? 😉

      Think about your ridiculous allégations. Why would the Nazi racialists have wanted to create fake blue-eyed people while they could produce as many blue-eyed people as they wanted to by making babies? If they had created fake blue-eyed people, they would have been unable to know who was a real blue-eyed person and who wasn’t. it would have been counterproductive in terms of racial preservation. It’s like for plastic surgery. Jews may have their hooked noses planed with scalpels, but they will have hook-nosed babies anyway because it’s in their genes.

      Comment by hermie — July 7, 2013 @ 10:13 am

      • Look up a company called Stroma Medical. Evidently the Chosen ones don’t mind dying eyes blue if they’re making money off of it…

        Comment by schlageter — July 9, 2013 @ 2:59 pm

        • I already knew there was now a medical technique to make eyes blue, but it doesn’t come from racialists. Aryan racialists have no interests in creating fake blue eyes, ‘beauty merchants’ have.

          Comment by hermie — July 10, 2013 @ 7:01 am

          • To change your eye color, all you have to do is to buy blue contact lenses. I have seen African-Americans wearing blue contact lenses.

            Comment by furtherglory — July 10, 2013 @ 7:59 am

        • And you conclude that this company consists of Jews based on what exactly?

          Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 1:52 pm

          • Based On The Fact The CEO Told Me The Founder And Developer Is A Jew, Mr Phd asshole

            Comment by schlageter — July 10, 2013 @ 2:42 pm

            • Really? Gregg Homer, who the Web site tells us got his bachelor’s degree at Immaculate Heart College, is a Jew? And the CEO, Douglas Daniels, told you this? I can check with him and ask him? Because I have several ins at the American Academy of Ophthalmology…

              Comment by aemathisphd — July 10, 2013 @ 7:32 pm

              • So Go Ask Doug.Report Back To Us…

                Comment by schlageter — July 11, 2013 @ 4:52 am


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.