You can read about it in this news article: https://reason.com/volokh/2018/06/04/the-masterpiece-cakeshop-decision-leaves
The following quote is from the news article:
Begin quote
Do bakers have a First Amendment right to refuse to bake cakes for same-sex weddings, even if there’s a state law banning sexual orientation discrimination by such businesses?
Do they have a First Amendment right to refuse to bake such cakes that contain text or symbolism (e.g., rainbow striping) that the bakers disapprove of?
How about wedding photographers or videographers, who create products that (unlike most cakes) are traditionally seen as speech? How about calligraphers or graphic designers, who have an objection to personally writing or typing certain messages?
Scrapbookpages Blog 
It would seem then that the persecution of the cake makers is more comparable to the holocaust than the other way around.
The cake makers who literally did nothing. Write or wrong their ‘crime’ was inaction. What sort of society wants to destroy people for thi gs they did not do?
They were destroyed publicly for not doing something, not for any actual actions they did take.
Comment by William H — March 26, 2021 @ 6:14 am
Im trying to send an email to you but get it in return with the comments “mail@scrap…” Doesn’t exist.
Best regards
Georg
Comment by Georg Schwab — January 15, 2019 @ 9:46 am
Woman who ran this site passed away…. you’re out of luck.
Jim Rizoli
Comment by Jim Rizoli — January 15, 2019 @ 9:55 am
Okay. Should’ve gassed the gays that wanted the wedding cake. Then they’d have something to cry about.
Comment by Tim — September 25, 2018 @ 5:44 pm
FG. HIOw did my comments from here,end up on another blog? “History Blog Critic”. That’s the name of the blog. Never heard of it till just now.
Comment by Tim — June 11, 2018 @ 10:03 pm
June 6, 2018: Nothing about the Allied invasion of briefly-liberated Europe and the subsequent restoration of the destruction of Europe (or “Edom,” as they say) by God’s Chosenites and their useful id… er enlightened helpers ???
Comment by hermie — June 6, 2018 @ 8:44 pm
“It was against the law in Germany for men to engage in homosexual acts.”
Yes, it was know as Paragraph 135, a provision of the German Criminal Code from 15 May 1871 to 10 March 1994, which made homosexual acts between males a crime. It was against the law in Germany (and everywhere else) for men to solicit money on the streets for homosexual acts. Only recidivist homosexual prostitutes, as well as some big makers of gay propaganda such as the Jewish gay activist Kurt Hiller (the main organizer of Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute of Sex Research), ranging from 5,000 to 15,000 men, were ever sent to German concentration camps. As Holocaust believers often say to Holocaust revisionists facing jail, their choice, their sentence…
Comment by hermie — June 5, 2018 @ 4:26 pm
As usual Sscheisskopf hermie got it wrong: It was paragraph 175 of the Bürgerliche Strafgesetzbuch that made same-sex between males (not females) a criminal act!
Dachau was full of the passive partners in sodomy. Although Himmler realized that homosexuality would eventually prevail within the camps, and provided brothels – Dachau had two facilities but was torn down by the welcoming ‘Liberators’.
And another thing, hermie, keep your paper clippings as Scheosshaus-Papier (Shithouse Paper)
Comment by Herbert Stolpmann — June 6, 2018 @ 12:42 am
Direct your complaint to Wikipedia, Shiksa Boy. The part calling Paragraph 175 “a provision of the German Criminal Code from 15 May 1871 to 10 March 1994” was a direct quote from there (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paragraph_175). Honestly, you are quibbling. “Civil Penal Code” (Bürgerliche Strafgesetzbuch ) or “Criminal Code,” that makes no difference. As usually, a ridiculous nit picking for diversion purposes.
“Dachau was full of the passive partners in sodomy.”
Yes, of paid passive partners in sodomy, i.e. of gay prostitutes who had decided to break the German law several times and who logically faced the consequences of their criminal choice and obstinacy through internment in some re-education camps.
“And another thing, hermie, keep your paper clippings as Scheosshaus-Papier (Shithouse Paper)”
I do already have more than enough Shithouse Paper for my own use with the Jewish treaty of Gentile subjugation aka “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” and a variety of laughable academic papers on the Holocaust conspiracy theory. And you’d better avoid talking about Shithouse Paper after posting so many ludicrous & unsubstantiated horror stories on this blog. This is too funny.
Comment by hermie — June 6, 2018 @ 1:17 am
You give me one example were I have been posting ‘so many ludicrous & unsubstantiated horror stories on this blog’,- or lied in any way, as you claim
Comment by Herbert Stolpmann — June 6, 2018 @ 9:15 am
Don’t expect me to waste even one minute of my time looking for some examples of your past poor contributions on this blog. But you know very well what I was talking about (i.e. about the ludicrous testimonial-based “history books” (novels) you like quoting). [Terror BS…]
Comment by hermie — June 6, 2018 @ 8:01 pm
End quote
So how does not baking a cake compare to the Holocaust?
During the Holocaust, gay men were arrested and sent to concentration camps — for breaking the law, not for being gay. It was against the law in Germany for men to engage in homosexual acts.
Time to bring these laws back.
JR
Comment by Jim Rizoli — June 5, 2018 @ 1:21 pm