Scrapbookpages Blog

September 13, 2013

British soldiers executed under Hitler’s Commando order — legal or illegal?

Filed under: Germany, World War II — Tags: , , — furtherglory @ 9:55 am

This quote, from Wikipedia, gives the full text of Hitler’s Commando Order:

On October 18 after much deliberation by High Command lawyers, officers and staff, Hitler issued his Commando Order or Kommandobefehl in secret, with only 12 copies. The following day Army Chief of Staff Alfred Jodl distributed copies with an appendix stating that the order was “intended for commanders only and must not under any circumstances fall into enemy hands.” The order itself stated that

1. For a long time now our opponents have been employing in their conduct of the war, methods which contravene the International Convention of Geneva. The members of the so-called Commandos behave in a particularly brutal and underhand manner; and it has been established that those units recruit criminals not only from their own country but even former convicts set free in enemy territories. From captured orders it emerges that they are instructed not only to tie up prisoners, but also to kill out-of-hand unarmed captives who they think might prove an encumbrance to them, or hinder them in successfully carrying out their aims. Orders have indeed been found in which the killing of prisoners has positively been demanded of them.

2. In this connection it has already been notified in an Appendix to Army Orders of 7.10.1942. that in future, Germany will adopt the same methods against these Sabotage units of the British and their Allies; i.e. that, whenever they appear, they shall be ruthlessly destroyed by the German troops.

3. I order, therefore:— From now on all men operating against German troops in so-called Commando raids in Europe or in Africa, are to be annihilated to the last man. This is to be carried out whether they be soldiers in uniform, or saboteurs, with or without arms; and whether fighting or seeking to escape; and it is equally immaterial whether they come into action from Ships and Aircraft, or whether they land by parachute. Even if these individuals on discovery make obvious their intention of giving themselves up as prisoners, no pardon is on any account to be given. On this matter a report is to be made on each case to Headquarters for the information of Higher Command.

4. Should individual members of these Commandos, such as agents, saboteurs etc., fall into the hands of the Armed Forces through any means – as, for example, through the Police in one of the Occupied Territories – they are to be instantly handed over to the SD

To hold them in military custody – for example in P.O.W. Camps, etc., – even if only as a temporary measure, is strictly forbidden.

5. This order does not apply to the treatment of those enemy soldiers who are taken prisoner or give themselves up in open battle, in the course of normal operations, large scale attacks; or in major assault landings or airborne operations. Neither does it apply to those who fall into our hands after a sea fight, nor to those enemy soldiers who, after air battle, seek to save their lives by parachute.

6. I will hold all Commanders and Officers responsible under Military Law for any omission to carry out this order, whether by failure in their duty to instruct their units accordingly, or if they themselves act contrary to it.[8]

In other words, Hitler became enraged by the actions of the British Commandos and decided to fight fire with fire.  The British were affronted by this.  The British thought they should have been allowed to fight illegally.  In fact, the SOE agents WERE allowed to fight illegally and most of them were not executed after they were caught. Still, they groused about being sent to a concentration camp, instead of a POW camp.

In 2002, I visited the Sachsenhausen Memorial Site for the 2nd time.  The layout of the Memorial Site has changed since then, but in 2002 there was a path, up to the Museum, which was lined with memorial stones.

Entrance road at Sachsenhausen Memorial Site in 2002

Entrance road at Sachsenhausen Memorial Site in 2002

I photographed some of the memorials along the entrance road, shown in the photo above, but not the flat stone, which was put on the ground, beside the path, in remembrance of some British commandos who were executed at Sachsenhausen, under Hitler’s Commando order.

Memorial stone in honor of British soldiers who were executed at Sachsenhausen

Memorial stone in honor of British soldiers who were executed at Sachsenhausen

In 2002, I wrote, on my scrapbookpages.com website, regarding the memorial stone above:

[There] is another small memorial stone to the British spies who were captured and executed at Sachsenhausen.

This morning, I received an e-mail from a man who objected to my use of the word “spies.”  He pointed out that these were British soldiers, all of whom had a military rank beside their names.  This indicates that they were soldiers, not spies. He wrote that these men were Commandos who had been illegally executed under Hitler’s famous Commando Order.

Plaque at Mauthausen Memorial Site in honor of British commandos

Plaque at Mauthausen Memorial Site in honor of British commandos who were executed

List of British agents who were executed at Mauthausen

List of British agents who were executed at Mauthausen

The memorial plaque, shown in the photo above, is located on the wall in the narrow space behind the building where the gas chamber is located at the Mauthausen Memorial Site. The plaque is in honor of 47 British and Dutch “special agents” who had parachuted into German occupied territory and had been caught behind enemy lines, dressed in civilian clothes.

Was it legal to execute these “special agents”?  Not according to the British.

Both sides used Commandos during World War II.  The photo below shows Otto Skorzany, the famous German Commando.  Skorzeny and his men were brought before the American Military Tribunal at Dachau and prosecuted as war criminals. So wouldn’t the British commandos also have been “war criminals” who could have been legally executed?   No, only the Germans were “war criminals” in World War II.  After the war, the Allies made up ex-post-facto laws that made virtually every German guilty of a war crime.

Otto Skorzany, famous German Commando

Otto Skorzany, famous German Commando

Otto Skorzeny, shown in the photo above, was acquitted after the presiding judge at his AMT trial allowed testimony that the American military had committed the same crime of wearing enemy uniforms during the Battle of the Bulge. Although he was acquitted, Skorzeny was still held in prison after the verdict; he finally escaped and fled to South America.

This quote, regarding Hitler’s Commando Order is from Wikipedia:

The Commando Order was invoked to order the death of an unknown number of Allied special operations forces and behind-the-lines operators of the OSS, SOE, and other special forces elements.[citation needed] “Commandos” of these types captured were turned over to German security and police forces and transported to concentration camps for execution. The Gazette citation reporting the awarding of the G.C. to Yeo-Thomas describes this process in detail.

The first victims were seven officers of Operation Musketoon, who were shot in Sachsenhausen on the morning of 23 October 1942.

In November 1942, British survivors of Operation Freshman were executed.

[…]

In 1945, Jack Taylor and the Dupont mission were captured by the men of Gestapo agent Johann Sanitzer. Sanitzer asked the RSHA for instructions on a possible deal that Taylor proposed, but Kaltenbrunner’s staff reminded him “of Hitler’s edict that all captured officers attached to foreign missions were to be executed”.[14] Taylor was convicted of espionage, though he claimed to be an ordinary soldier. He was sent to Mauthausen. He survived, barely, but gathered evidence and was eventually a witness at the war crimes trials.[a]

Jack Taylor was sent to Mauthausen under the Commando Order, but he was not executed

Jack Taylor was sent to Mauthausen under the Commando Order, but he was not executed

War Crimes

The laws of war as accepted by all civilized countries in 1942 were unequivocal on this point: “….it is especially forbidden….to declare that no quarter will be given”. This was established under Article 23 (d) of the 1907 Hague Convention IV – The Laws and Customs of War on Land.[16] The Geneva Convention of 1929, that Germany had ratified, defined who should be considered a prisoner of war on capture — that included enemy soldiers in uniforms — and how they should be treated. While at the time under both the Hague and Geneva Conventions, it was legal to execute “spies and saboteurs” disguised in civilian clothes[17][18] or uniforms of the enemy,[19][20] insofar as the Commando Order applied to soldiers in proper uniforms,[21] it was in direct and deliberate violation of both the customary laws of war and Germany’s treaty obligations.[b] The execution of Allied commandos without trial was also a violation of Article 30 of the 1907 Hague Convention IV – The Laws and Customs of War on Land, provided that: “A spy taken in the act shall not be punished without previous trial.”[16] This provision only includes soldiers caught behind enemy lines in disguises, and not those wearing proper uniforms. Soldiers in proper uniforms cannot be punished for being lawful combatants and must be treated as prisoners of war upon capture, except those disguised in civilian clothes or uniforms of the enemy behind enemy lines.[19][23][24]

The fact that Hitler’s staff took special measures to keep the Order secret, including the limitation of its printing to only twelve copies, strongly suggests that they knew it to be illegal.[25]

[..]

After the war, German officers who carried out executions under the Commando Order were found guilty at war crimes trials, including the Nuremberg Trials.

General Anton Dostler, who had ordered the execution of 15 American soldiers of the Ginny II operation in Italy, was sentenced to death and executed in December 1945. His defense, that he had only relayed superior orders, was rejected at trial.

The Commando Order was one of the specifications in the charge against Generaloberst Jodl, who was convicted and hanged. Another officer charged with enforcing the Commando Order at Nuremberg was the Commander of the Navy Erich Raeder. Under cross-examination, Raeder admitted to passing on the Commando Order to the Kriegsmarine and to enforcing the Commando Order by ordering the summary execution of two captured British Royal Marines after the Operation Frankton raid at Bordeaux in December 1942.[28]

When American soldiers arrived at Mauthausen to liberated the camp in May 1945, they were greeted by 37-year-old Lt. Jack H. Taylor, a Commando in the United States Navy, who had been captured after leading a sabotage mission behind enemy lines. Lt. Taylor had been a prisoner at Mauthausen for only 35 days; he had arrived in the camp on April 1, 1945, after being transferred from a Gestapo prison in Vienna because Soviet troops were 50 kilometers from the city and advancing rapidly.

Lt. Taylor was not executed by the Germans, even though his sabotage mission behind enemy lines came under Hitler’s Commando order.  If the war had lasted longer, could he have been legally executed?

This quote is from Wikipedia:

The Commando Order was issued by Adolf Hitler on 18 October 1942 stating that all Allied commandos encountered by German forces in Europe and Africa should be killed immediately without trial, even in proper uniforms or if they attempted to surrender. Any commando or small group of commandos or a similar unit, agents, and saboteurs not in uniforms, who fell into the hands of the German military forces by some means other than direct combat (through the police in occupied territories, for instance) were to be handed over immediately to the Sicherheitsdienst (SD, Security Service). The order, which was issued in secret, made it clear that failure to carry out these orders by any commander or officer would be considered to be an act of negligence punishable under German military law.[1] This was in fact the second “Commando Order”,[2] the first being issued by Generalfeldmarschall Gerd von Rundstedt on 21 July 1942, stipulating that parachutists should be handed over to the Gestapo.[3] Shortly after World War II, at the Nuremberg Trials, the Commando Order was found to be a direct breach of the laws of war, and German officers who carried out illegal executions under the Commando Order were found guilty of war crimes.

[…]
The Commando Order mentioned violations of the Geneva Conventions by Allied commando troops and cites these violations as justification for the order. It is widely believed that occurrences at Dieppe and on a small raid on the Channel Island of Sark by the Small Scale Raiding Force (with some men of No. 12 Commando) brought Hitler’s rage to a head.

5 Comments

  1. >Skorzeny and his men were brought before the American Military Tribunal at Dachau and prosecuted as war criminals. So wouldn’t the British commandos also have been “war criminals” who could have been legally executed? No, only the Germans were “war criminals” in World War II.

    Actually, Skorzeny and his men were tried at the Dachau Trials under charges of ordering their own soldiers to fight in American uniforms. However, there was no proof Skorzeny and his men actually gave the order so they were acquitted. Legally, combatants are allowed to wear enemy uniforms or civilian clothes (as recognized in Article 24 of the 1907 Hague Convention on Land Warfare) but before taking any combat actions, they must remove their disguises and put on proper insignia so that they are lawful combatants and entitled to be treated as POWs if captured by the enemy. Otherwise, you’re not only treated as a spy (only if captured behind enemy lines) but as a war criminal (which makes you liable to be captured and tried at any time at any place unlike a spy who returns to his own lines) for fighting while so disguised.

    >Otto Skorzeny, shown in the photo above, was acquitted after the presiding judge at his AMT trial allowed testimony that the American military had committed the same crime of wearing enemy uniforms during the Battle of the Bulge.

    False, 18 of Skorzeny’s men were captured behind American lines while wearing American uniforms during the Battle of the Bulge and were executed as spies because they admitted themselves that they sneaked behind American lines on a mission of espionage or sabotage. You can’t just shoot them simply for wearing enemy uniforms in order to keep them warm during the cold winter in Belgium. To prove that he is actually a spy, Article 29 of the 1907 Hague Convention on Land Warfare states that a person is considered a spy when “acting clandestinely or on false pretences” and that “he obtains or endeavours to obtain information in the zone of operations of a belligerent, with the intention of communicating it to the hostile party.”

    This provision distinguishes between using enemy uniforms or civilian clothes for spying behind enemy lines and using them other than spying (such as using it to keep you warm or using it to escape back to friendly lines). Escaping POWs or downed pilots are allowed to wear disguises to avoid detection in order to reach back to friendly lines but once caught while still behind enemy lines, they cannot be executed if the enemy don’t have any proof that they were using disguises for spying and must be treated as POWs (POWs are only liable to disciplinary punishment, not execution). I don’t any proof of American soldiers infiltrating German lines on a military operation while wearing German uniforms during the Battle of the Bulge. Severe punishment can only occur if a combatant is captured behind enemy lines in disguise and proves that he’s on a mission of espionage or sabotage. A combatant cannot be executed as a spy while wearing an enemy uniform or civilian clothing if he is captured behind his own lines. This is stipulated in Article 31 of the 1907 Hague Convention on Land Warfare which provides that:

    “A spy who, after rejoining the army to which he belongs, is subsequently captured by the enemy, is treated as a prisoner of war, and incurs no responsibility for his previous acts of espionage.”

    If a combatant is captured behind his own lines whether in proper uniform or not (as long they don’t engage in combat while wearing the wrong uniform), he cannot be punished and must be treated as a POW. The same thing goes for spies who returns to their own lines and is captured by the invading enemy whether in enemy uniforms or not. The threat and risk among both the enemy and a spy behind enemy lines is gone once a spy returns to his own lines.

    >Lt. Taylor was not executed by the Germans, even though his sabotage mission behind enemy lines came under Hitler’s Commando order. If the war had lasted longer, could he have been legally executed?

    Lt. Taylor was captured in his own uniform and Nazis don’t execute him either some officers don’t feel like it or avoided obeying an illegal order (Commando Order), especially during the last months of the war. Legally? No, the Commando Order was NOT legal, it was illegal since many of the executed Allied commandos were in proper uniforms which makes them NO different than the properly uniformed armed forces invading enemy territory. The Commando order is mandated to carry it out, not that it was legal. There is a difference between the two. Article 23 of the 1907 Hague Convention states that it is forbidden “to declare that no quarter will be given”. No quarter means that you can’t issue orders or declare something that is entirely illegal to begin with. This article cleary and intentionally sounds like an apologist for Germany. The Commando Order is ILLEGAL no matter how you spin it.

    Comment by Jack Hawks. — September 28, 2013 @ 12:33 pm

  2. its surprising the BRD establishment have not named an airport or a few roads after Dasch after all the new Berlin Airport if it is ever opened after its 66,000 faults are rectified was either going to be named after Willy Brandt or Marliene Dietrich, both of whom were traitors.

    Comment by peter — September 20, 2013 @ 2:48 pm

  3. FG
    All belligerent countries in most cases would execute Agents if caught in one way or another, this included the USA. The most bizarre attempt by Canaries, on Hitler’s orders, was the operation ‘Pastorious’. All eight, taken by two U-boats separately to the States, were betrayed by the Judas, named Dasch, he and Burger, (who had sat 17 months in Gestapo custody), got away with jail sentences, but all the others received the electric chair. (Roosevelt felt this was mandatory). From memory Burger was a full Colonel in the SS and demoted to private, but the Americans recognized his superior rank and the military tribunal comprised even of Generals Eisenhower and Douglas. It was Roosevelt that insisted execution by electrocution, others recommended the firing squad or hanging.
    It was Truman later on who released both of them in 1948 into the American Sector of Germany, but they were not welcomed home. They were abused as traitors, Dasch had for sometime a Newspaper Stand to have an income and finally went to East Germany, but the anti-fascist was not trusted and he fled back to the West. He died 1991.
    Burger lived in Bavaria and worked as a trained toolmaker, there is very little known of him, he vehemently denied that he ever betrayed anyone!
    There is more to the story but readers might get bored.

    Comment by Herbert Stolpmann — September 14, 2013 @ 1:38 am

    • Thank you so much for this information.

      Comment by furtherglory — September 14, 2013 @ 8:17 am

    • The German agents captured in the United States were dressed in civilian clothes while attempting to carry out acts of sabotage within the country, hence making them spies. The Allied commandos executed under Hitler’s Commando Order wore their own military uniforms, hence making them POWs. You obviously can’t understand the difference between the two things.

      Comment by Jack Hawks. — September 28, 2013 @ 12:45 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.