Several years ago, there was a YouTube video which showed Fred Leuchter, Jr. speaking about the gas chambers at Auschwitz. Since then, the video has been taken down. However, you can read what Leuchter wrote about the Holocaust gas chambers here.
Leuchter’s life was ruined after he testified in the trial of a Holocaust denier in Canada a few years ago, after which, he apparently went into hiding, in fear of his life.
This quote is from the website, cited above:
…. a very believing engineer sat at his desk working one snowy January afternoon in 1988, when the telephone rang. This very believing engineer [Fred Leuchter] was about to receive a very shocking history lesson, one which would cause him to question that 50-year-old Holocaust lie and the application of that lie to generations of children. “Hello, this is Robert Faurisson” — and that very believing engineer would believe no more. […]
4. Construction
Construction of these facilities shows that they were never used as gas chambers. None of these facilities were sealed or gasketed. No provision was ever made to prevent condensation of gas on the walls, floor or ceiling. No provision ever existed to exhaust the air-gas mixture from these buildings. No provision ever existed to introduce or distribute the gas throughout the chamber. No explosion-proof lighting existed and no attempt was ever made to prevent gas from entering the crematories, even though the gas is highly explosive. No attempt was made to protect operating personnel from exposure to the gas or to protect other non-participating persons from exposure. Specifically, at Auschwitz, a floor drain in the alleged gas chamber was connected directly to the camp’s storm drain system. At Majdanek a depressed walkway around the alleged gas chambers would have collected gas seepage and resulted in a death trap for camp personnel. No exhaust stacks ever existed. Hydrogen cyanide gas is an extremely dangerous and lethal gas, and nowhere were there any provisions to effect any amount of safe handling. The chambers were too small to accommodate more than a small fraction of the alleged numbers. Plain and simple, these facilities could not have operated as execution gas chambers.
Note that virtually everything that Fred wrote is what I have been trying to communicate through my blog for over two years.
Except for one tiny detail: “the floor drain in the alleged [Auschwitz] gas chamber” is included in the reconstructed gas chamber that is shown to tourists, but this drain was originally inside a washroom in the gas chamber building in the main camp.
I previously blogged about the Auschwitz gas chamber floor drain here. I also blogged about the 6 floor drains in the Dachau gas chamber here. According to Fred, a gas chamber absolutely cannot have even one floor drain, much less 6 drains.
Good article, thanks. Wow, hot comments. To me, the weakest part of the Holohoax is the crematoriums. Anyone can Google how long it takes to cremate a body today. So, just doing the math, makes liars out of all the so called survivor stories. Bodies are not made out of tissue paper, you can’t cremate thousands of bodies daily with just a few furnances.
Comment by Dennis Gannon — March 13, 2018 @ 7:59 am
keep up the good work
Comment by grey wolf — November 18, 2017 @ 3:44 pm
Wow! You deniers ARE still using Fred Leuchter as a source!!!!
I find this a surprise…For a group of people who will try and find any slight inconsistency in the memory of a soldier or witness as proof the Holocaust is a hoax, I am surprised that you would dismiss Messr. Leuchter’s little (Ok “little” that’s sarcasm) credibility problem. HERE IS THE BIG PROBLEM LEUCHTER REPRESENTED HIMSELF TO BE AN ENGINEER, WHEN HE WAS ONLY A HISTORY STUDENT. LET ME blunt here.any person who would represent them self to belong to a profession they are indeed not, is a fraud. Mr. Leucther, who runs quite a shakedown with his execution business (in his glory days he would threaten to represent in court on behalf of a condemned person that the existing execution apparatus could malfunction, if the state didn’t purchase his services. While I could sort of commend the man for creating his niche business, I love the entrepreneur…I stop short of such praise because he was a sleaze who exploited the courts (e.g. government) to peddle his product (no wonder Holocaust Denial was so attractive to him)…. it doesn’t change the fact that he is a fraud…. By the way, if you read the transcripts, when questioned about his lack of an engineering degree at Boston University, his response was that didn’t offer Engineering when he went there (oops they did, three degrees – by the way when you are on the stand that’s called perjury).
Leuchter, in the late 80’s decided to branch out his business to provide services in Holocaust denial. He testified in court (to the tune of this Youtube Video). Mr. Leuchter, should have known that expert witnesses are required to provide accurate information about their backgrounds….you know things like….I don’t know your degree. Look I know it was Canada, but Canada does follow the British model, and thus the rules of evidence are similar to ours. Now I’m sure all of you out living in Joseph Goebbelsland lie about your degrees every day, to employers, courts, etc… I bet one of you is going to apply to be head brain surgeon tomorrow at the Fred Leuchter Judenfrei Medical Center. Wonder how many of you/your relatives/firends are/will be treated by a Jewish Doctor in your life time.
Look this wasn’t just a nit pick (which makes up about 80% of what comes out of this cite) , it was a pretty big one…. See the problem is that when you testify you need to be qualified as an expert, you need at least a degree. I am surprised Mr. Zundel’s, (a big time Joseph Goebbelsland Executive himself, who was dealing with his own holocaust denial problems) attorney, didn’t vet this guy out….perhaps that’s part of another Jewish conspiracy. Anyway beside getting destroyed on his background and scientific methods, etc… When The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, specifically their engineers, read about Leuchter (who made himself a target when he appeared in such a high profile case), they were not thrilled to see someone representing themselves as one without taking the exams (By the way this is the same for most professions in almost every state and nation)…. Mr. Leuchter was quite lucky (and probably advised (I wonder if he hired a Jewish attorney : ) to sign acknowledgement of this (we live in a very forgiving country).
***For the record I vehemently oppose criminalization of holocaust deniers; instead I support ridicule…That being said if you are to attach your name to the science I fully support a Government and Private Employer’s right to not hire you based on the fact its not a good business decision!
Anyway, if you are interested you can read about the man who you cite in whole and part throughout your fantasy excursion into Goebbelsland you can cut and paste into your browser.
http://www.holocaust-history.org/leuchter-consent-agreement/ (You can see the actual consent agreement here…this is proof).
http://www.nizkor.org/faqs/leuchter/leuchter-faq-22.html (You can read the cross examination as well as the unwinding of Mr. Leuchter racket here)..
http://www.nizkor.org/faqs/leuchter/ (Messr. Leuchter’s science is numerously flawed, for those of you (and probably there aren’t many) who come here can read a pretty well kept log of refuting of Mr. Leuchter here)
So I imagine most of you who visit this site are of the same mindset (willfully blind, old fashioned Jew hatred, and not highly compensated), but for those of you who wish to depart the confines of your blind-hatred, those who want to take responsibility for their won failings rather than blame them on some massive conspiracy, for those who wish to free themselves, I would suggest you read this, and then without “group think” analyze Mr. Leuchter rationally….
Or try this thought experiment (Jew-Albert Einstein liked thought experiments), if proof of the Holocaust was solely based upon a witness with EXACTLY THE SAME CREDENTIALS AS MESSR. LEUCHTER, how would you react? Let me assure you it would be a frenzy, or should I say Jihad (for the Islamists of your group).
Comment by NeverAGAIN! — May 28, 2013 @ 9:06 am
I know all about how Fred Leuchter was discredited and ridiculed to negate his findings. That is old news. Your comment reveals that you are way behind in your knowledge of Holocaust denial. Fred Leuchter has dropped out of sight, in fear of his life.
Try reading the personal website of Germar Rudolf at http://germarrudolf.com/a-rebel/ Try reading some of Germar Rudolf’s books. Germar climbed down into the Krema II gas chamber, the same as Fred Leuchter, and wrote about his findings. He paid for this by spending years in prison in Germany, but he is out now.
Most of my readers are very up-to-date on the Holocaust. Your comments stand out because you are commenting like a Holocaust believer from the dark ages. Holocaust denial is main stream now.
Comment by furtherglory — May 28, 2013 @ 9:37 am
Comment by NeverAGAIN! — May 29, 2013 @ 11:42 am
You need to join a forum where Holocaust believers and Holocaust deniers discuss all the minute points of the Holocaust. Two forums: http://www.rodoh.us/
http://holocaustcontroversies.yuku.com/
You are commenting on a BLOG, but you have written a small book, suitable for a discussion forum. I don’t have the time to go over all of your minute details and refute them, point by point.
You might try writing your own Blog, so you can present your point of view and let others comment. No one has the time to read your excessively long comments.
If you start your own blog, you should tell your grandmother’s story of how she escaped the gas chamber and go on from there.
Comment by furtherglory — May 29, 2013 @ 12:50 pm
The why do you claim, “Note that virtually everything that Fred wrote is what I have been trying to communicate through my blog for over two years” when you admit he was discredited. You were called out on it and only then do you come clean. “Holocaust denial is mainstream now”? On what planet?
Nothing like seeing someone use the internet to publicly humiliate themselves.
Comment by Rich — January 8, 2017 @ 6:57 pm
Testifying in court. Hhmmm…oh dear, if all the holocaust ‘survivors’ testified in court with all their ridiculous lies and contradictory evidence, that would be interesting, wouldn’t it?
Comment by DB — May 28, 2013 @ 11:23 am
I wrote about Fred Leuchter because he was NOT a revisionist before he climbed down into what he thought was a gas chamber. He accepted the job of examining the “gas chamber” because he was the one and only gas chamber consultant in the WORLD. He didn’t need a degree in gas chamber engineering to determine if a gas chamber was authentic. Any ordinary person, with half a brain, could have done the job of gathering the evidence that the lawyers wanted for the defense in a trial in Canada.
If Fred had found that the morgue room in Krema II was really a gas chamber, he would have testified to that in the trial. He knew nothing about the Holocaust, and didn’t care about it one way or the other, when he went into the underground morgue and examined it.
The prosecution in the trial in Canada could have sent their own gas chamber expert into the underground morgue room in Krema II and proved that it was a gas chamber, not a morgue. Why didn’t they?
Comment by furtherglory — May 28, 2013 @ 3:21 pm
Leuchter was unregistered at “The Board of Registration of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors” of Massachusetts…like 95% of the engineers working in Massachusetts at that time (In 1988 there were 55,000 engineers working in Massachusetts and only 5,000 of them were ‘registered engineers’.). What a great finding you’ve just made, NeverAgain!
That trick is very funny when it comes from people who base their entire faith on the works of a political scientist as Raul Hilberg. 😉
Leuchter’s qualifications as a technical expert and inventor are actually quite impressive. He has a bachelor’s degree in history, which he earned at Boston University in 1964. He did post-graduate study in celestial navigation mechanics at the Harvard-Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Since 1965, he has worked as an engineer on projects having to do with electrical, optical, mechanical, navigational and surveying problems. From 1965 through 1970 he was the technical director for a firm in Boston, where he specialized in airborne, opto-electronic, and photographic surveillance equipment. He designed the first low-level, color, stereo-mapping system for use in a helicopter, which has become an airborne standard. In 1970, he formed an independent consulting firm. During his period with this firm, he designed and built the first electronic sextant and developed a unique, light-weight, compact and inexpensive optical drum sector encoder for use with surveying and measuring instruments. He also built the first electronic sextant for the US Navy. He has worked on and designed astro trackers utilized in the on-board guidance systems of ICBM missiles. He designed a computerized transit for surveying use, and several years ago he developed the first low-cost personal telephone monitor.
During the past 14 years, Leuchter has been a consultant to several state governments on equipment used to execute convicted criminals, including hardware for execution by lethal injection, electrocution, gassing and hanging. In the course of this work, he designed a new gas chamber for the state of Missouri, and he designed and constructed the first lethal injection machine for New Jersey. Leuchter has also been a consultant on execution procedures. He has held a research medical license from both state and federal governments, and has supplied the necessary drugs for use in execution support programs. At that time, Leuchter was recognized as the foremost American expert on the design and fabrication of gas chambers and other hardware used to execute criminals in the United States. He has worked on and designed facilities used to kill condemned criminals with hydrogen cyanide gas, the same gas supposedly used to kill many hundreds of thousands of Jews at Auschwitz.
William Armontrout, warden of the Missouri State Penitentiary, testified on this matter during the 1988 “Holocaust Trial” of Ernst Zündel. As warden, Armontrout supervised the state’s execution gas chamber. He testified under oath that he had consulted with Leuchter on the design, maintenance and operation of the Missouri gas chamber, and confirmed that, to the best of his knowledge, “Leuchter is the only such consultant in the United States.”
In 1987, he formed Fred A. Leuchter Associates, a consulting engineering firm specializing in general consulting and the design and construction of prototype hardware. He has been a forensic engineer consultant, and has testified as an expert in courts in the United States and Canada.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p429_Leuchter.html
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v12/v12p421_Weber.html
In other words Leuchter is/was a hundred times more legitimate than Hilberg and Pressac were as far as gas chambers are concerned. 😉
Comment by hermie — May 29, 2013 @ 3:40 am
In 1998, I went on a 1/2 day guided tour of the Auschwitz main camp. This was an official tour, which I purchased through a tour company in New York City. I paid for a private tour for one person. At the end of my half day tour of the main camp, I told my guide that I wanted to see the Birkenau camp. She told me that the New York tour company did not offer a tour of Birkenau because “there is nothing to see there.”
When I told the tour guide that I wanted to see Birkenau in spite of there being “nothing to see there,” she told me that Raul Hilberg had only taken a 1/2 day tour of the main Auschwitz camp before he wrote his book, The Destruction of the European Jews. She added that it was dangerous to walk around the Birkenau camp because it was full of snakes and bees.
But she did hook me up with a Jewish guide who would be willing to escort me to Birkenau. This new guide could not drive, so I had to pay for a driver in addition to paying extra for a tour of Birkenau.
Fred Leuchter braved the snakes and bees at Birkenau, and climbed down into the gas chamber, not knowing if it were full of snakes. He took his life in his hands, literally and figuratively, to check out the gas chamber.
I tried to check my guide’s claim that Hilberg had not seen Birkenau before he wrote his book. I could not find verification of this claim, but I did find this on Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Destruction_of_the_European_Jews
Begin Quote:
Hilberg began his study of the Holocaust leading to The Destruction while stationed in Munich in 1948 for the U.S. Army’s War Documentation Project. He proposed the idea for the work as a PhD. dissertation and was supported in this by his doctoral advisor, Columbia University professor Franz Neumann.
End Quote
Comment by furtherglory — May 29, 2013 @ 8:07 am
FG wrote: “I tried to check my guide’s claim that Hilberg had not seen Birkenau before he wrote his book. I could not find verification of this claim, but I did find this on Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Destruction_of_the_European_Jews”
In 1985 (1st Zündel trial) Hilberg admitted that he had seen Auschwitz-Birkenau only once in his entire life and that it was just for a memorial ceremony. In other words Hilberg wrote a book on something he had never studied himself. That’s what exterminationist ‘research’ is most of the time…
Comment by hermie — May 31, 2013 @ 9:25 am
So you’re saying that the famous Holocaust expert, Raul Hilberg, didn’t wade through the tall grass at Birkenau, taking a chance on being stung by bees or bitten by snakes, and he didn’t climb down into the alleged gas chambers before he wrote about the Jews being gassed at Birkenau? That makes him a REAL Holocaust expert, not an “evil denier” who deserves to be in prison for 5 years.
Comment by furtherglory — May 31, 2013 @ 12:20 pm
That’s exactly what I was saying, deliciously sarcastic friend. 😉
Comment by hermie — June 1, 2013 @ 7:33 pm
You wrote: “William Armontrout, warden of the Missouri State Penitentiary, testified on this matter during the 1988 “Holocaust Trial” of Ernst Zündel. As warden, Armontrout supervised the state’s execution gas chamber. He testified under oath that he had consulted with Leuchter on the design, maintenance and operation of the Missouri gas chamber, and confirmed that, to the best of his knowledge, “Leuchter is the only such consultant in the United States.”
Very few states in the United States used gas chambers at that time. AFIK, there were no gas chambers used in Europe. So Leucter was the only gas chamber consultant in the WORLD. His life and his business were destroyed by the Jews after his testimony at the trial.
Comment by furtherglory — May 29, 2013 @ 8:20 am
FG wrote: “So Leucter was the only gas chamber consultant in the WORLD.”
He would still be if he had concluded that the Auschwitz ‘gas chambers’ had been homicidal gas chambers. He had warned Zündel before leaving for Poland that he would say those rooms were gas chambers if he thought they were. But when he saw those ‘gas chambers’, an expert like him quickly understood those rooms had never been used for homicidal mass gassings and that’s what he told during the 2nd Zündel trial. From that point his brilliant career was over and he wasn’t an expert anymore but an ‘evil denier’ crook.
Comment by hermie — May 31, 2013 @ 9:33 am
“So I imagine most of you who visit this site are of the same mindset (willfully blind, old fashioned Jew hatred, and not highly compensated)”
Ahem, well no actually,
I am a daughter of a Waffen SS soldier and witnessed his flashbacks…so no I cannot deny the Holocaust. Having said that, I also do not buy into the version of the Holocaust that is woven throughout our Western culture. Because I come at this story personally it has enabled me to see through the constructs of the story but I do crave facts and a point of view that is not overly influenced by western ‘guilty bystander’ culture.
I find the seeking of facts in this site refreshing and a relief. I am also impressed with the research in many of the comments, although I do not sympathise with many conclusions and how those facts seem to be used to justify hatred on both ‘sides’.
This website also seems to encourage conversation about the material form both ‘sides’. To me that is about truth seeking…and unlike work, hopefully a bit more truth might set us free.
Comment by Rose Nooteboom — June 8, 2013 @ 7:30 pm
If your father was a Waffen SS soldier, he probably never saw a concentration camp. His “flashbacks” were probably images of what he saw on the battlefield and images of the German people who were treated badly by the Allies.
Go to this page of my website: http://www.scrapbookpages.com/DachauScrapbook/DachauTrials/MalmedyMassacre02A.html where you can see a photo of the half-eaten body of a German soldier who was mutilated by Russian cannibals.
Read about the rape of German women in any of the many books about it: http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2002/may/01/news.features11
Read about the Nemmersdorf Massacre on Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nemmersdorf_massacre
Begin Quote:
Karl Potrek of Königsberg, leader of a Volkssturm company present on the retaking of the village, testified in a 1953 report:
“In the farmyard stood a cart, to which more naked women were nailed through their hands in a cruciform position…Near a large inn, the ‘Roter Krug’, stood a barn and to each of its two doors a naked woman was nailed through the hands, in a crucified posture….In the dwellings we found a total of 72 women, including children, and one old man, 74, all dead….Some babies had their heads bashed in.”[3]
End Quote
I mentioned the Nemmersdorf Massacre on my blog at https://furtherglory.wordpress.com/2012/03/17/the-nemmersdorf-massacre/
Comment by furtherglory — June 9, 2013 @ 6:29 am
Unlike Exterminationists, Revisionist dealt with the technical flaws of the work and improved on it. Holocoasters preferred to make the whole thing an ad-hominem smear campaign.
Comment by Andreas Meyer — February 16, 2017 @ 6:29 am
David Irving, David Cole, Mark Weber and Christian Lindtner are famous “Holocaust deniers” who have, for various reasons, amended or recanted their original positions without really offering any revelatory new evidence for disappearance of European Jewry. They’ve apparently accepted the “Holocaust by bullets” narrative being put forward now by people like the Catholic priest Father Patrick Desbois and the legitimacy of documents indicating millions were starved, worked to death, shot and gassed by the Nazis. I hate to be a party pooper, but Holocaust revisionism as an intellectual “movement” is essentially moribund despite the fact there are more blogs and You Tube videos than there ever were during the heyday of the Zundel trials and the IHR.
Comment by who dares wings — May 26, 2013 @ 2:05 pm
“David Irving, David Cole, Mark Weber and Christian Lindtner are famous “Holocaust deniers” who have, for various reasons, amended or recanted their original positions”
Interesting article written by Robert Faurisson about Mark Weber and why the IHR is dying: https://furtherglory.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/dachaue019.jpg
David Irving has never been a “Holocaust denier”. After reading the Leuchter report in the 1980’s, he stopped to believe in the Auschwitz gas chambers. But he never stopped to believe in the Holocaust by gas at the Reinhardt camps and the Holocaust by bullets in Far Eastern Europe. Irving once said he has never really been interested in the Holocaust. He’s a Third Reich historian, not a Holocaust historian (and even less a “Holocaust denier”). But the media and some exterminationist historians like Deborah Lipstadt labelled him a “Holocaust denier” in spite of that.
Interesting article written by Jürgen Graf about Irving and the Reinhardt camps: http://juergen-graf.vho.org/articles/david-irving-and-the-aktion-reinhardt-camps.html
Comment by hermie — May 26, 2013 @ 7:38 pm
Edit:
Here is the article written by Faurisson on Mark Weber: http://robertfaurisson.blogspot.be/2009/04/mark-weber-must-resign-from-institute.html?m=1
Comment by hermie — May 26, 2013 @ 7:40 pm
I met Mark Weber in person once and I was not impressed. He was not exactly a warm and friendly person, but just the opposite. I heard him give a speech; someone in the audience asked him if he were Jewish. He answered that his sister is Jewish but he is not. So, in other words, he was born of a Jewish mother, but he is not a Jew. I was concerned about his motive for being a revisionist. I was suspicious that he might be infiltrating the revisionist community to do some harm.
Comment by furtherglory — May 27, 2013 @ 6:20 am
I met David Irving in person once and I was very impressed with him. He is a bit conceited but he has a right to be conceited. You are correct that he is a great historian, but not a Holocaust historian. He gave a speech in which he said that he believes that Jews were killed at Treblinka. He certainly didn’t say anything like that during the trial after Lipstadt accused him of being a “Holocaust denier.” I think he just said that because he wants to hang onto his reputation as a historian and sell his books on World War II.
Comment by furtherglory — May 27, 2013 @ 6:32 am
If Weber was born of a jewish mother, he’s a jew himself. Maybe he meant he’s an atheist, but he’s a jew by blood anyway. I didn’t know that. His jewishness could explain a lot of things…
David Irving is a great historian but he should stay away from the Holocaust. Nothing forces him to be interested in the Holocaust. So he should write and talk about the matters he’s an expert in and leave the Holocaust stuff to the real experts in that matter. Irving is way more interesting to read and to listen to when he tells the epic stories of the 3rd Reich than when he tries to credit the holofable in order to regain his lost credibility. When Irving talks about the Holocaust and play the Zionists’ game he harm his own career because the Zionist lobby will label him “a Holocaust denier” anyway. For his own sake he should stop giving water to the Zionist mill and only do what he ‘s excellent in.
Comment by hermie — May 27, 2013 @ 2:53 pm
I googled “mark weber jewish sister” and found this:
http://www.tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and-politics/7721/the-denial-twist-part-iv
Apparently his sister converted. Weber was raised Catholic.
Comment by blake121666 — May 28, 2013 @ 8:26 pm
I only hope you are aware of just how worthy the work you’re doing is – this coming from a former hardline believer like myself.
Comment by s.c — May 26, 2013 @ 10:58 am